B Occlusion Exceptions

95
Consequences of not meeting all the requirements. Consequence #1 Bone loss B1

Transcript of B Occlusion Exceptions

Page 1: B Occlusion Exceptions

Consequences of not meeting all the requirements.

Consequence #1Bone loss

B1

Page 2: B Occlusion Exceptions

Some of the reasons for bone loss.• Bone weak / unhealthy. Smoking can impact.• Position of the tooth in the bony dental arch.• Poor oral hygiene.• Low pivot center within the tooth. • Whole tooth moves in the socket. Similar to

rocking post in the ground to loosen it.• Thickened periodontal ligament.• Periodontal pockets deepen and get increased

invasions of micro-organisms.

B2

Page 3: B Occlusion Exceptions

Simple illustration demonstrating how by just taping a post lightly on the side over a long period of time can eventually loosen the post. The same thing can happen to a tooth.

B3

Page 4: B Occlusion Exceptions

Bone loss illustration

Thickened periodontal ligament.

Small lateral forces hitting the tooth from

many different directions, in a tooth

with a low pivot point, may eventually

loosen the tooth.

B4

Page 5: B Occlusion Exceptions

Bone loss cases

Case #1

B5

Page 6: B Occlusion Exceptions

Anterior view. Very shallow bite.B6

Page 7: B Occlusion Exceptions

Right side (reflective). Note tongue thrust & recession #5.

Mirror#5

Tongue thrust

B7

Page 8: B Occlusion Exceptions

1983 FMX. Note bone level around #s 5 and 18.

#5

#18

B8

Page 9: B Occlusion Exceptions

1990. FMX. Note bone level around #s 5 and 18.

Most significant bone loss on these 2 teeth.

#5

#18

B9

Page 10: B Occlusion Exceptions

Bone around #18 in 1983.

#18

B10

Page 11: B Occlusion Exceptions

Bone around #18 in 1990.

B11

Page 12: B Occlusion Exceptions

#18

1983

#18

1990

Bone loss that occurred over 7 years was the result

of traumatic occlusion.

B12

Page 13: B Occlusion Exceptions

Case mounted on semi-adjustable

articulator in Centric Relation.

B13

Page 14: B Occlusion Exceptions

Note posterior contact on #18 during excursion.

#18

B14

Page 15: B Occlusion Exceptions

Close up of contact on #18.B15

Page 16: B Occlusion Exceptions

Bone level on #5 in 1983.

#5

B16

Page 17: B Occlusion Exceptions

Bone level on #5 in 1990.

#5

B17

Page 18: B Occlusion Exceptions

Bone level on #5 in 1983.

#5

Bone level on #5 in 1990.

#5

B18

Page 19: B Occlusion Exceptions

Note contact between #s 5 & 29.

# 5

# 29

B19

Page 20: B Occlusion Exceptions

Reason why maxillary first bicuspids most prone for breakdown.

1) First bicuspid is usually the first tooth that hits, or guides, if there is no cuspid rise.

High cuspid.

2) First bicuspid usually has a weak root structure

3) First bicuspid usually has a proximal concavity that also makes it a weak tooth.

4) Maxillary bone less dense than mandibular bone.

B20

Page 21: B Occlusion Exceptions

High cuspid.

High cuspid.

Drawing somewhat depicting the situation.

Bicuspid rise instead of cuspid rise.

B21

Page 22: B Occlusion Exceptions

Note markings on #s 5 and 15.

#5

#15

B22

Page 23: B Occlusion Exceptions

Note markings on #s 18 and 29.B23

Page 24: B Occlusion Exceptions

Maxillary model equilibrated.B24

It can be determined where a tooth was adjusted and by how much by staining the teeth on

the model first.

Page 25: B Occlusion Exceptions

Mandibular model equilibrated.B25

Page 26: B Occlusion Exceptions

Mandibular flat-planed hard acrylic splint fabricated demonstrating

centric stops (dots) and cuspid rise guidance (green line),

B26

Page 27: B Occlusion Exceptions

Bone loss

Case 2

B27

Page 28: B Occlusion Exceptions

Panoramic radiograph. Note bone loss around #15.

Do not have that extensive bone loss in rest of mouth.

#15

B28

Page 29: B Occlusion Exceptions

Bone loss around #15.B29

Page 30: B Occlusion Exceptions

Mounted case demonstrating interference during excursion.B30

Page 31: B Occlusion Exceptions

Interference cause by contact between #s 15 & 18.

#15

#18

B31

Page 32: B Occlusion Exceptions

Close up of interference.

#15

#18

B32

Page 33: B Occlusion Exceptions

1 mm 3 mm.

Reason for more breakdown around maxillary second molars.

1) Closest tooth to the TMJ fulcrum. Less chance for error - about 1:3 ratio to anterior teeth.

2) Receives strongest force on it because of muscle position.

3) Maxillary bone less dense than mandibular bone.

B33

Page 34: B Occlusion Exceptions

Maxillary lingual cusp tip below the curve of Wilson. Interferes during excursions.

Curve of Wilson

Curve of Wilson

B34

Page 35: B Occlusion Exceptions

Mandibular model equilibrated.B35

Page 36: B Occlusion Exceptions

Maxillary model equilibrated.B36

Page 37: B Occlusion Exceptions

Mounted models equilibrated. Note anterior contact.

Anterior contact.

B37

Page 38: B Occlusion Exceptions

#15

#18

Mounted models equilibrated so as to have anterior contact before

equilibrating in the mouth..

Anterior contact.

Original posterior interference between 15 and 18 during excursion..

Correction of posterior interferences.

Anterior open.

B38

Page 39: B Occlusion Exceptions

Perio chart.

Because of equilibration and

improved oral hygiene, teeth have stabilized and are

healthy.

B39

Progression of disease.

Page 40: B Occlusion Exceptions

Abfractions

Consequence #2

B40

Page 41: B Occlusion Exceptions

Definition of an abfraction

Grippo J. Abfractions: A new classification of hard tissue lesions of teeth. J Esthetic Dent. Jan/Feb 1991:14-18

Due to the stresses resulting from biomechanical loading forces exerted on the teeth (static, as in swallowing and clenching or cyclic, as in chewing) both enamel and dentin can chip or break away. This loss of tooth substance, which shall be termed Abfraction, is dependent on the magnitude, duration, direction, frequency, and location of the forces. These abfractive lesions are caused by flexure and ultimate material fatigue of susceptible teeth at locations away from the point of loading.

B41

Page 42: B Occlusion Exceptions

Lines of stress directed down to apical area.

Lines of stress concentrating in area of cervical

region.

Tooth bends or flexes around

pivot area.

A B

A - Ideal loading on teeth.

B - Traumatic forces.

B42

Page 43: B Occlusion Exceptions

Forces that can be working on teeth at any time.

Green arrow - only non-destructive force.

Blue arrow - lateral force from tongue.

Pivot Point

B43

Page 44: B Occlusion Exceptions

Reasons for abfractions, cervical erosion, clefts, recession.

• Fairly high pivot point.• Root solid in the bone.• Crown flexes.• Enamel rods split and fracture off.• Thinness / health of bone in the area.• Key point: Abnormal lateral forces that

tooth was not designed to withstand flex and eventually fracture off parts of tooth. B44

Page 45: B Occlusion Exceptions

Extracted tooth with abfraction. Note size of abfraction and marked indent. Tooth was unrestorable because of sub gingival depth of defect and patient’s desire not to spend any money on the tooth.

Indent

B45

Page 46: B Occlusion Exceptions

Same tooth prior to extraction. Abfraction TOTALLY SUBGINGIVAL. Tooth brushing could not have caused it!

Same indent

Tongue thrust

B46

Page 47: B Occlusion Exceptions

Abfractions are seen on a daily basis in dental offices today. Abfraction on right was only tooth I could find during research at Smithsonian.

B47

Page 48: B Occlusion Exceptions

Similar to other case but with multiple abfractions. Note tongue thrust.

B48

Page 49: B Occlusion Exceptions

Multiple abfractions. Note different angulations of each defect.Tooth brushing could not have caused these defects. The abfraction was so deep that one tooth actually fractured in half.

B49

Page 50: B Occlusion Exceptions

These abfractions were due to the traumatic lateral forces created by this tongue thrust.B50

Page 51: B Occlusion Exceptions

Abfractions: in summaryAbfractions are due to the traumatic lateral forces created by either a malocclusion or a tongue thrust - or both.

There is a complete presentation and two articles on abfractions elsewhere on this website.

The reason abfractions are rarely found on prehistoric teeth is due to the fact that prehistoric humans did not have any other choice of nurturing their young other than breastfeeding. Breastfeeding was responsible for better occlusions and lack of tongue thrusts in prehistoric times.

B51

Page 52: B Occlusion Exceptions

Flattened occlusions

Consequence #3

B52

Page 53: B Occlusion Exceptions

Flat occlusion.

B53

Page 54: B Occlusion Exceptions

Reason for flattened occlusion.• Root - Crown - Bone - are all solid.• Bruxing is major contributor to flat teeth.• Attrition of the enamel just due to wear over

time.• Chewing of coarse foods.

B54

Page 55: B Occlusion Exceptions

Prehistoric skull illustrating a flat occlusion.B55

Page 56: B Occlusion Exceptions

An example of flat occlusion.B56

Page 57: B Occlusion Exceptions

Another example of flat occlusion. Have a slight reverse curve of Wilson.B57

Page 58: B Occlusion Exceptions

Close-up of previous mouth.B58

Page 59: B Occlusion Exceptions

Tori

Consequence #4

B59

Page 60: B Occlusion Exceptions

Tori Non pathologic outgrowths of bone.

‘compression ionization’

B60

Page 61: B Occlusion Exceptions

Reasons for tori• Similar to a flattened occlusion in that the root, crown

and bone are all solid.• There is ‘compression ionization’ or some form of

stimulation through the bone that causes more bone to be laid down. The bone is laid down as a ‘support system’ to help prevent the teeth from rocking in the bone and causing damage.

• Tori are most prevalent in clenchers, bruxers, worriers, nervous individuals and those who have a driver-type personality.

• They are non-pathologic outgrowths of bone.

B61

Page 62: B Occlusion Exceptions

1998

1994

Same individual.

B62

Example of tori growth over 4 years.

Page 63: B Occlusion Exceptions

1995

2004

Same individual.

(Post whitening.)B63

Example of tori growth over 9 years.

Page 64: B Occlusion Exceptions

Example of mandibular lingual tori.B64

Page 65: B Occlusion Exceptions

Example of mandibular buccal tori.B65

Page 66: B Occlusion Exceptions

Massive buccal and lingual tori.

B66

Page 67: B Occlusion Exceptions

Massive tori take up tongue space. Lady had OSA.

B67

Page 68: B Occlusion Exceptions

Large palatal torus.B68

Page 69: B Occlusion Exceptions

Another massive palatal torus. B69

Page 70: B Occlusion Exceptions

See full presentation on tori elsewhere on this website.

B70

Page 71: B Occlusion Exceptions

Cracked teeth

Consequence #5

B71

Page 72: B Occlusion Exceptions

Fractured teeth are sometimes difficult to see and cracks do not always show up on radiographs.

One diagnostic tool that can sometimes be used is finding

one significant pocket like this around a tooth when

most of the other pockets are within normal limits.

B72

Page 73: B Occlusion Exceptions

Panoramic of 1987.

Bite-wings of 2004.

4 cracked teeth that needed root canals and crowns.B73

Page 74: B Occlusion Exceptions

Heavy bruxing at night caused these deep

grooves. This splint used to be very flat, had no grooves and had fine

cusp tip contacts.

B74

Page 75: B Occlusion Exceptions

Heavy bruxing at night caused these deep

grooves. This splint used to be very flat, had no grooves and

had fine cusp tip contacts.

B75

Page 76: B Occlusion Exceptions

Tight bites

Consequence #6

B76

Page 77: B Occlusion Exceptions

A B

Ideal bite. Tight bite.

Incline (flat) contacts and damaging lines of force.

Point contacts and forces directed down long axis of tooth.

B77

Page 78: B Occlusion Exceptions

Tight bite• Inclines (broader surfaces) of opposing teeth are

in contact. Contacts between teeth are much broader than ‘point contacts’. This may cause flat wear facets.

• Can be due to discrepancy in arch width and/or teeth having incorrect angulation or slant, or missing teeth (which can cause shifting or drifting of teeth).

• Results in forces being directed in the wrong directions within the tooth (black arrows) and not in the direction of the long axis.

B78

Page 79: B Occlusion Exceptions

Heavy ‘wear’ facets and tori are due to tight bite.B79

Page 80: B Occlusion Exceptions

Tight bite. Nearly end-to-end malocclusion.B80

Page 81: B Occlusion Exceptions

Tight bite and tongue thrust (green arrow) caused these abfractions. See next slide.B81

Page 82: B Occlusion Exceptions

Abfractions restored.B82

Page 83: B Occlusion Exceptions

Inward slant of upper anteriors locks bite in causing recession.

B83

Page 84: B Occlusion Exceptions

Mal-alignments

Consequence of

B84

Page 85: B Occlusion Exceptions

Mal-aligned cuspid.

Root tip angled distally.

Longitudinal forces are running in the wrong direction. Should be running in direction of dotted arrow.

Too angled.

B85

Page 86: B Occlusion Exceptions

Too upright.

Mal-aligned cuspid.

Interferes with the “Envelope of Function”.

B86

Should have position of dotted tooth.

Page 87: B Occlusion Exceptions

Mal-positioned cuspid.B87

Page 88: B Occlusion Exceptions

Cuspid too upright.B88

Page 89: B Occlusion Exceptions

Another cuspid that is too upright.B89

Page 90: B Occlusion Exceptions

Cuspid and bicuspid have wrong angulations.B90

Page 91: B Occlusion Exceptions

Cuspid too upright and bicuspid too angled.B91

Page 92: B Occlusion Exceptions

Bicuspid damaged because these was no cuspid rise and bicuspid too angled.B92

Page 93: B Occlusion Exceptions

Recession on bicuspid result of forces generated by excessive lean.B93

Page 94: B Occlusion Exceptions

Post ortho case. Teeth crowded and have bad angulation

B94

Page 95: B Occlusion Exceptions

End of section B

Brian Palmer, D.D.S. Leawood, Kansas December 2004.