B-acute leukemic lymphoblasts versus hematogones: the wolf in sheep's...
Transcript of B-acute leukemic lymphoblasts versus hematogones: the wolf in sheep's...
![Page 1: B-acute leukemic lymphoblasts versus hematogones: the wolf in sheep's clothing](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022072110/575095a01a28abbf6bc3729c/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
COMMENTARY
B-acute leukemic lymphoblasts versus hematogones: the wolf in sheep’sclothing?
ANNA KALFF & SURENDER JUNEJA
Department of Diagnostic Haematology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Melbourne, Australia
Hematogones are normally occurring, immature B-
lineage cells which resemble malignant lymphoblasts
morphologically and by expression of immature B-
cell phenotype. These B-cell precursors are found in
small numbers in most marrow specimens, however
are reported to be present in larger numbers in
healthy infants and young children and may be
particularly prominent in the regeneration phase
following chemotherapy or bone marrow transplan-
tation (sometimes constituting 5% to more than 50%
of cells) [1].
Distinction of hematogone-rich lymphoid re-
generation from B-acute leukemic lymphoblasts
(B-ALL) is critical – precise identification of hema-
togones and leukemic blasts increases sensitivity of
minimal residual disease (MRD) detection and may
aid in development of more definitive therapeutic
targeting.
Hematogones have an extremely high phenotypic
stability unaffected by disease or therapy, or to their
coexistence with leukemic cells; in a recently
published study by Babusikova et al. [2] the pattern
of sequence and intensity of antigen expression was
virtually identical in all cases (669 patient samples) –
see Table I. Three stages of hematogone maturation
have been described – types 1, 2 and 3, with
characterised varying expression of antigens and
side scatter as demonstrated in Figure 1.
In contrast to this stability, neoplastic lympho-
blasts demonstrate multiple immunophenotypic
aberrancies [3], including maturational arrest (uni-
form expression of TdT and/or CD34), immuno-
phenotypic asynchrony (co-expression of early and
late antigens normally mutually exclusive in hema-
togones), over-expression or under-expression of
normally expressed antigens and frequent expression
of cross-lineage antigens (e.g. CD19 and CD33).
Despite these distinguishing phenotypic features,
and topographic differences like interstitial disper-
sion without significant clustering in the bone
marrow trephine biopsy [4], there may remain
significant overlap between hematogones and leuke-
mic lymphoblasts resulting in the challenging situa-
tion of distinguishing between these cell types. It is
the type 1, or immature hematogones that most often
pose the greatest challenge of distinguishing between
benign regenerative change from B-leukemic blasts.
Type 1 hematogones are TdTþ, CD34þ and
demonstrate low CD45 expression, all similar to B
lymphoblasts. These similarities can make assess-
ment of patients for MRD following chemotherapy/
bone marrow transplantation or diagnosis of
early relapse with small volume disease difficult to
interpret.
Sevilla [5], report in this issue of Leukemia and
Lymphoma the reproducible spectrum of expression
of cytoplasmic IgM in the context of the three
currently recognised maturational stages of hemato-
gones, highlighting the complementary role this
marker may have in further distinguishing between
these benign cells and the leukemic B-lymphoblasts.
They have demonstrated that as hematogones
mature, they acquire cytoplasmic IgM in conjunction
with brighter expression of CD19, decreased expres-
sion of CD10 and loss of TdT and CD34. This
acquisition of cytoplasmic IgM was found to occur
early during the transition to the intermediate
stage (type 2 hematogones). Cytoplasmic IgM is
expressed on lymphoblasts in the most mature
precursor B differentiation stage (pre-B ALL), and
Correspondence: Anna Kalff, Department of Diagnostic Haematology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Melbourne, Australia.
E-mail: [email protected]
Leukemia & Lymphoma, April 2009; 50(4): 523–524
ISSN 1042-8194 print/ISSN 1029-2403 online � 2009 Informa Healthcare USA, Inc.
DOI: 10.1080/10428190902725839
Leu
k L
ymph
oma
Dow
nloa
ded
from
info
rmah
ealth
care
.com
by
Uni
vers
ity o
f M
inne
sota
on
09/2
5/13
For
pers
onal
use
onl
y.
![Page 2: B-acute leukemic lymphoblasts versus hematogones: the wolf in sheep's clothing](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022072110/575095a01a28abbf6bc3729c/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
is generally not expressed on pro-B or common-B
lymphoblasts [6].
The caveat to this, however, is the well described
phenomenon of ‘phenotypic switch’ in relapsed
leukemic blasts, particularly, in B-ALL. Essentially,
all cases of B-ALL demonstrate multiple immuno-
phenotypic aberrancies relative to their normal
counterpart (hematogones) and stability of these
aberrancies has relevance to follow-up MRD analy-
sis. Loss or gain of aberrancy occurs in a high
proportion of patients (70% and 60%, respectively)
[3] with B-ALL. The analysis of cytoplasmic IgM
was not performed in this larger analysis by Chen
et al. [3] and the sample size (n¼ 25) in this current
study by Sevilla [5], did not permit such analysis.
So, the reproducible expression of cytoplasmic
IgM on hematogones becomes an additional anti-
genic marker to aid in the distinction of hematogones
from leukemic blasts. However, the problem of
phenotypic switch still remains, and results should
never be interpreted in isolation, but in conjunction
with other parameters – such as morphologic features
and molecular studies.
Declaration of interest: The authors report no
conflicts of interest. The authors alone are respon-
sible for the content and writing of the article.
References
1. McKenna RW, Washington LT, Acquino DB, Picker LJ,
Kroft SH. Immunophenotypic analysis of hematogones (B-
lymphocyte precursors) in 662 consecutive bone marrow
specimens by 4-color flow cytometry. Blood 2001;98:2498–
2507.
2. Babusikova O, Zeleznikova T, Kirschnerova G, Kankuri E.
Hematogones in acute leukemia during and after therapy. Leuk
Lymphoma 2008;49:1935–1944.
3. Chen W, Karandikar NJ, McKenna RW, Kroft SH. Stability of
leukemia-associated immunophenotypes in precursor B-lym-
phoblastic leukemia/lymphoma: a single institution experience.
Am J Clin Pathol 2007;127:39–46.
4. Rimsza LM, Larson RS, Winter SS, Foucar K, Chong YY,
Garner KW, Leith CP. Benign hematogone-rich lymphoid
proliferations can be distinguished from B-lineage acute
lymphoblastic leukemia by integration of morphology, immu-
nophenotype, adhesion molecule expression, and architectural
features. Am J Clin Pathol 2000;114:66–75.
5. Sevilla DW, Emmons FN, Bai X, Colovai A, Bhagat G, Alobeid
B. The pattern of cytoplasmic IgM expression in the context of
the three currently recognised maturational stages of hemato-
gones. Leuk Lymphoma 2009;50:642–644.
6. WHO classification of tumours of haematopoietic tissue and
lymphoid tissues. Swerdlow SH CE, Harris NL, Pileri SA,
Stein H, Thiele J, Vardiman JW, editor. Lyon, France:
International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC); 2008.
Table I. Antigen expression of B-leukemic lymphoblasts and all
three maturational stages of hematogones.
B-leukemic
lymphoblasts
Hematogones
1 2 3
CD10 þ/7 Bright þ þCD19 þ/7 þ þ þþCD20 þ/7 7 þ Bright
CD22 þ/7 þ þ þCD34 þ/7 þ 7 7CD38 þ þ þ þCD45 Low Low þ Bright
nTdT þ þ 7 7Cytoplasmic IgM + 7 þ þþ
Adapted from Babusikova et al. [2].
Figure 1. CD45 versus side scatter flow cytometric histogram.
Demonstrates varying expression of CD45 and side scatter and the
changes with maturation from the most immature hematogones –
type 1 (HG1 pink) [low CD45 and low side scatter], through to
type 2 (HG2 green) and to the most mature – type 3 (HG3 red).
A normal lymphoid gate is also demonstrated (blue).
524 A. Kalff & S. Juneja
Leu
k L
ymph
oma
Dow
nloa
ded
from
info
rmah
ealth
care
.com
by
Uni
vers
ity o
f M
inne
sota
on
09/2
5/13
For
pers
onal
use
onl
y.