Azimuth ambiguity resolution from dBz/dz
description
Transcript of Azimuth ambiguity resolution from dBz/dz
![Page 1: Azimuth ambiguity resolution from dBz/dz](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051316/56815a8e550346895dc80442/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
2006/4/17-20 Extended 17th SOT meeting
Azimuth ambiguity resolution Azimuth ambiguity resolution from dBz/dzfrom dBz/dz
M. Kubo (ISAS/JAXA), K. Shimada (University of Tokyo),
K. Ichimoto, S. Tsuneta (NAOJ)and
SOT-team
![Page 2: Azimuth ambiguity resolution from dBz/dz](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051316/56815a8e550346895dc80442/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2006/4/17-20 Extended 17th SOT meeting
If we can know sign of dBz/dz, the azimuth angle is determined.
We calculate the sign of dBz/dz by using(1) two different photospheric line profiles (Fe I 6301.5Å and Fe I 6302.5Å)(2) line-core and wing of one photospheric line profile (Fe I 6301. 5Å)
Azimuth ambiguityAzimuth ambiguity
• Resolution of azimuth ambiguity is very important for- determination of magnetic field structure.- calculation of shear angle, current density, and helicity.
• We try to resolve the azimuth ambiguity from only B = 0 with no assumption (L. Wu & G. Ai, 1990, ACTA). Magnetic fields must satisfy B = 0 .
0dzdB
dydB
dxdBB zyx
dBz/dz < 0 dBz/dz > 0
Bx, By Bx, By
![Page 3: Azimuth ambiguity resolution from dBz/dz](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051316/56815a8e550346895dc80442/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
2006/4/17-20 Extended 17th SOT meeting
dBz/dz from two different line profiles
• We obtain two Bz values using Fe I 6301.5Å and Fe I 6302.5Å lines.
- SOT/SP obtains full stokes profiles of Fe I 6301.5Å and Fe I 6302.5Å.
• Milne-Eddington inversion code is applied for each line to derive the magnetic field strengths with different height.
• Formation height of Fe I 6301.5Å is slightly higher than that of Fe I 6302.5Å.
Bz (6301.5Å) - Bz (6302.5Å) >0 dBz/dz > 0
Bz (6301.5Å) - Bz (6302.5Å) <0 dBz/dz < 0
Stokes V profile
![Page 4: Azimuth ambiguity resolution from dBz/dz](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051316/56815a8e550346895dc80442/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
2006/4/17-20 Extended 17th SOT meeting
Test CaseTest Case
case #field strength(@160km) [Gauss] 250 – 3000 (250 step) 12inclination angle [degree] 15, 45, 80 3azimuth angle [degree] 0 1filling factor 1 1Doppler shift 0 1dBz/dz 2Total 72
• We use Holweger & Muller model atmosphere to make synthesized Stoke profiles.
• Field strength has height gradient (dB/d = 300), and inclination does not vary with height.
• We examine 36 cases for dBz/dz >0 and 36 cases for dBz/dz <0.
inclination: 0 = vertical to the solar surface, 90 = horizontal to the solar surface
![Page 5: Azimuth ambiguity resolution from dBz/dz](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051316/56815a8e550346895dc80442/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
2006/4/17-20 Extended 17th SOT meeting
dBz/dz > 0
Result1Result1
input parameters: ◇: = 10 [deg] △: = 45 [deg] ×: = 80 [deg] red: dBz/dz > 0 blue: dBz/dz < 0 dBz/dz < 0
(Filling factor are fixed to 1 in this case.)
• A percentage of correct answers for both dBz/dz is 39 % (14/36).
• When filling factor becomes a free parameter, the percentage increases to 67% .
• The percentage of correct answers are not improved when thermodynamic parameters are fixed to values derived from both lines or when weight of Stokes-V increases in the ME inversion.
![Page 6: Azimuth ambiguity resolution from dBz/dz](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051316/56815a8e550346895dc80442/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
2006/4/17-20 Extended 17th SOT meeting
dBz/dz > 0
Result1Result1
dBz/dz < 0
(Filling factor are fixed to 1 in this case.)
input parameters: ◇: = 10 [deg] △: = 45 [deg] ×: = 80 [deg] red: dBz/dz > 0 blue: dBz/dz < 0
• A percentage of correct answers for both dBz/dz is 39 % (14/36).
• When filling factor becomes a free parameter, the percentage increases to 67% .
• The percentage of correct answers are not improved when thermodynamic parameters are fixed to values derived from both lines or when weight of Stokes-V increases in the ME inversion.
![Page 7: Azimuth ambiguity resolution from dBz/dz](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051316/56815a8e550346895dc80442/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
2006/4/17-20 Extended 17th SOT meeting
Difference of response function between line-core and wingDifference of response function between line-core and wing• We investigate difference between two Bz values derived from Stokes profiles around line core and wing.
• The line core profile represents magnetic fields in the upper atmosphere in comparison with magnetic fields derived from the wing.
Bz (line core) - Bz (wing) > 0 dBz/dz > 0 Bz (line core) - Bz (wing) < 0 dBz/dz < 0
• The line core is defined as line center 70 mÅ. The wing is defined as -300mÅ to -70 mÅ.
• We use Fe I 6301.5Å, because a response function of Stokes V to Bz for Fe I 6301.5Å is sharper than that of Fe I 6302.5Å.
Response function of Stokes-V to Bz
Line center: 6301.5Å
Stokes V profile (6301.5Å)
![Page 8: Azimuth ambiguity resolution from dBz/dz](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051316/56815a8e550346895dc80442/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
2006/4/17-20 Extended 17th SOT meeting
dBz/dz > 0
Result2Result2• A percentage of correct answers for both dBz/dz is 86 % (31/36), and it increase to 97% (29/30) for field strength > 500 Gauss.
• We may have to change wavelength sampling for line-core and wing with a width of Zeeman splitting.
dBz/dz < 0
(Filling factor and Doppler shift are fixed to 1 and 0 respectively in this case.)
input parameters: ◇: = 10 [deg] △: = 45 [deg] ×: = 80 [deg] red: dBz/dz > 0 blue: dBz/dz < 0
![Page 9: Azimuth ambiguity resolution from dBz/dz](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051316/56815a8e550346895dc80442/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
2006/4/17-20 Extended 17th SOT meeting
Summary and Future WorksSummary and Future Works
• Difference between the response functions of Stokes V for line-core and wing would be useful for calculating the sign of dBz/dz.
- We have to test this method for (1) many cases with various parameters (Doppler, filling factor..) (2) profiles including noise (3) observed Stokes profile
• We like to find the best way to calculate the sign of dBz/dz.
- We will try to derive the sign of dBz/dz by using (1) Neural network (2) PCA (3) Inversion with height gradient (4) etc
![Page 10: Azimuth ambiguity resolution from dBz/dz](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051316/56815a8e550346895dc80442/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
2006/4/17-20 Extended 17th SOT meeting
![Page 11: Azimuth ambiguity resolution from dBz/dz](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051316/56815a8e550346895dc80442/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
2006/4/17-20 Extended 17th SOT meeting
Stokes V profiles fitted for line core and wingStokes V profiles fitted for line core and wing
Input parameter Result
Field strength[Gauss]
Inclination[degree]
dBz/dz
A 2000 10 + OK
B 2250 10 + NG
C 2250 10 – OK
wingline coreinput
A
CB
![Page 12: Azimuth ambiguity resolution from dBz/dz](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051316/56815a8e550346895dc80442/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
2006/4/17-20 Extended 17th SOT meeting
Response function of Stokes-V to Bz, FeI6302.5A
![Page 13: Azimuth ambiguity resolution from dBz/dz](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051316/56815a8e550346895dc80442/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
2006/4/17-20 Extended 17th SOT meeting
Response function of Stokes-V to Bz, FeI6301.5A
![Page 14: Azimuth ambiguity resolution from dBz/dz](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051316/56815a8e550346895dc80442/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
2006/4/17-20 Extended 17th SOT meeting
= -168 ~ +168mA
![Page 15: Azimuth ambiguity resolution from dBz/dz](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051316/56815a8e550346895dc80442/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
2006/4/17-20 Extended 17th SOT meeting
6301.5A
6302.5A
![Page 16: Azimuth ambiguity resolution from dBz/dz](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051316/56815a8e550346895dc80442/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
2006/4/17-20 Extended 17th SOT meeting
Residual of ME fit
FeI6302.5ABt=100G