AVS 2002 Nov 3 - Nov 8, 2002 Denver, Colorado INTEGRATED MODELING OF ETCHING, CLEANING AND BARRIER...
-
date post
22-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
1
Transcript of AVS 2002 Nov 3 - Nov 8, 2002 Denver, Colorado INTEGRATED MODELING OF ETCHING, CLEANING AND BARRIER...
AVS 2002Nov 3 - Nov 8, 2002Denver, Colorado
INTEGRATED MODELING OF ETCHING, CLEANING AND BARRIER COATING PVD FOR POROUS AND
CONVENTIONAL SIO2 IN FLUOROCARBON BASED
CHEMISTRIES*
Arvind Sankaran1 and Mark J. Kushner2
1Department of Chemical Engineering2Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
University of Illinois, Urbana,
IL 61801, USAemail: [email protected]
http://uigelz.ece.uiuc.edu
*Work supported by SRC, NSF and SEMATECH
University of IllinoisOptical and Discharge Physics
AGENDA
Low dielectric constant materials
Surface reaction mechanism and validation Fluorocarbon etching of SiO2/Si
Ar/O2 etching of organic polymer
High aspect ratio etching of porous and non porous SiO2
Integrated Modeling: Ar/O2 strip of polymer and IMPVD
Concluding Remarks
AVS03_AS_02
University of IllinoisOptical and Discharge Physics
LOW DIELECTRIC CONSTANT MATERIALS
The increase in the signal propagation times due to RC delay has brought the focus onto low dielectric constant (low-k) materials (inorganic and organic)
AVS03_AS_03
Inorganics such as porous silica (PS) are etched using fluorocarbon chemistries; organics are etched using oxygen chemistries.
University of IllinoisOptical and Discharge Physics
GOAL FOR INTEGRATED MODELING
Plasma processing involves an integrated sequence of steps, each of which depends on the quality of the previous steps.
CFDRC_0503_05
University of IllinoisOptical and Discharge Physics
SURFACE REACTION MECHANISM - ETCH
CFx and CxFy radicals are the precursors to the passivation layer which regulates delivery of precursors and activation energy.
Chemisorption of CFx produces a complex at the oxide-polymer interface. 2-step ion activated (through polymer layer) etching of the complex consumes the polymer.
AVS03_AS_05
CFx Ion+
I*, CF2
SiO2CxFy SiOCFy
CxFy
Ion+
CO2Ion+
CO2
Polymer
SiF3
Ion+,FSiF3
CFx
Polymer
F
SiF SiF2 SiF3
Ion+,F
SiF3
SiO2
Plasma
Si
CxFy
Plasma
PassivationLayer
CxFyPassivation
Layer
Activation scales as 1/L and the L scales as 1/bias.
In Si etching, CFx is not consumed, resulting in thicker polymer layers.
Si reacts with F to release SiFx.
University of IllinoisOptical and Discharge Physics
SURFACE REACTION MECHANISMS - STRIP
AVS03_AS_06
Ar/O2 is typically used for polymer stripping after fluorocarbon etching and resist removal.
Little polymer removal is observed in absence of ion bombardment suggesting ion activation.
)()()(*
)(*)()(
gCOFgIsP
sPgOsP
x
For SiO2 etching in mixtures such C4F8/O2, the fluorocarbon polymer is treated as an organic. Resists are treated similarly.
University of IllinoisOptical and Discharge Physics
MONTE CARLO FEATURE PROFILE MODEL (MCFPM)
The MCFPM predicts time and spatially dependent profiles using energy and angularly resolved neutral and ion fluxes obtained from equipment scale models.
Arbitrary chemical reaction mechanisms may be implemented, including thermal and ion assisted, sputtering, deposition and surface diffusion.
Energy and angular dependent processes are implemented using parametric forms.
INTELTALK_AS_17
Mesh centered identity of materials allows “burial”, overlayers and transmission of energy through materials.
University of IllinoisOptical and Discharge Physics
MODELING OF POROUS SILICA
MCFPM may include “two phase” materials characterized by porosity and average pore radius.
Pores are incorporated at random locations with a Gaussian pore size distribution. Pores are placed until the desired porosity is achieved with/without interconnects.
AVS03_AS_07
deviation standard:
radius pore average:
)(
0
)(
)(2
20
r
r
erP r
rr
Interconnected structures can be addressed.
University of IllinoisOptical and Discharge Physics
TYPICAL PROCESS CONDITIONS
Process conditions Power: 600 W Pressure: 20 mTorr rf self-bias: 0-150 V C4F8 flow rate: 40 sccm
The fluxes and energy distributions are obtained using the HPEM.
AVS03_AS_08
0 1 2 3 4 5 60123456 F + (1 0 1 7 )
C F 2+ (1 0 1 7 )C F3 + (1 0 1 6 )
02468 F (1 0 1 7 )
C F 2 (1 0 1 7 ) H (1 0 1 8 )C F (1 01 7 )
R a d iu s (cm )
Ion Fluxes (cm-2 s-1 )
Neutral Fluxes (cm-2 s-1 )
0 5 105100
5
10
15 Coils
SubstrateWafer
Feed ring
Pump port
Radius (cm)
Hei
ght (
cm)
University of IllinoisOptical and Discharge Physics
BASE CASE ION AND NEUTRAL FLUXES
Self-bias = - 120 V. Decrease in neutral and ion fluxes along the radius have compensating effects.
AVS03_AS_09
Ions have a narrow energy and angular distribution, in contrast to neutrals.
0 1 2 3 4 5 60
1
2
3
4
5
6
7F ( 1 0 1 5 )
C F 2 ( 1 0 1 7 )
C F ( 1 0 1 6 )
R a d i u s ( c m )
Ne
utr
al
Flu
xe
s (
cm
-2s
-1)
C 2 F 4 ( 1 0 1 7 )
C 2 F 3 ( 1 0 1 6 )
0 1 2 3 4 5 60
1
2
3
4
5
6
C F + (1 0 1 4 )
C F 2+ (1 0 1 5 )
C F 3+ (1 0 1 4 )
R a d i u s ( c m )
Ion
Flu
xe
s (
cm
-2s
-1)
C 2 F 4+ ( 1 0 1 5 )
University of IllinoisOptical and Discharge Physics
VALIDATION OF REACTION MECHANISM: C4F8
The mechanism was validated with experiments by Oehrlein et al using C4F8, C4F8/Ar and C4F8/O2.1
Threshold for SiO2 etching was well captured at self-bias -40 V. Polymer formation is dominant until the threshold bias
As polymer thins at higher biases, the etching proceeds.
AVS03_AS_10
1 Li et al, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 20, 2052, 2002.
0 50 100 150 2000
100
200
300
400
500
600
Model - MExperiment - E
SiO2 - E
SiO2 - M
Self Bias (-V)
Etc
h R
ate
(nm
/min
)
C4F8
University of IllinoisOptical and Discharge Physics
VALIDATION: C4F8/Ar and C4F8/O2
Larger ionization rates result in larger ion fluxes in Ar/C4F8 mixtures. This increases etch rates.
With high Ar, the polymer layers thins to submonolayers due to less deposition and more sputtering and so lowers etch rates.
O2 etches polymer and reduces its thickness. Etch rate has a maximum with O2, similar to Ar addition.
AVS03_AS_11
0 20 40 60 80 1000
100
200
300
C4F8/O2
SiO2 - E
SiO2 - M
Etc
h R
ate
(nm
/min
)
O Content (%)2
0 20 40 60 80 1000
100
200
300
400
500
C4F8/Ar
SiO2 - E
SiO2 - M
Etc
h R
ate
(nm
/min
)
Ar Content (%)
University of IllinoisOptical and Discharge Physics
PROFILE COMPARISON: MERIE REACTOR
AVS03_AS_12
Process conditions Power: 1500 W CCP Pressure: 40 mTorr Ar/O2/C4F8: 200/5/10 sccm
V. Bakshi, Sematech
CF2Density
MERIE Reactor Experiment Model
University of IllinoisOptical and Discharge Physics
VALIDATION OF POROUS SiO2 ETCH MODEL
Two porous substrates 2 nm pore radius, 30% porosity 10 nm pore radius, 58% porosity
Process conditions Power: 1400 W (13.56 MHz) Pressure: 10 mTorr rf self-bias: 0-150 V 40 sccm CHF3
Etch rates of P-SiO2 are higher than for NP-SiO2 due to lower mass densities of P-SiO2.
AVS03_AS_13
Exp: Oehrlein et al, J. Vac. Sci.Technol. A 18, 2742 (2000)
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 1400
100
200
300
400
500
6000
100
200
300
400
500
600
Self Bias (-V)
E-PSM-PS
2 nm, 30%Et
ch R
ate (n
m/mi
n)
E-PSM-PS
10 nm, 58%
Etch
Rate
(nm/
min)
= Porous= Solid SiO2
PSSS
= Experiment= Model
EM
CHF3
CHF3
E-SS
M-SS
E-SSM-SS
University of IllinoisOptical and Discharge Physics
WHAT CHANGES WITH POROUS SiO2?
The “opening” of pores during etching of P-SiO2 results in the filling of the voids with polymer, creating thicker layers.
Ions which would have otherwise hit at grazing or normal angle now intersect with more optimum angle.
INTELTALK_AS_30
An important parameter is L/a (polymer thickness / pore
radius).
Adapted: Standaert, JVSTA 18, 2742 (2000)
University of IllinoisOptical and Discharge Physics
EFFECT OF PORE RADIUS ON HAR TRENCHES
AVS03_AS_15
With increase in pore radius, L/a decreases causing a decrease in etch rates.
Thicker polymer layers eventually lead to mass corrected etch rates falling below NP-SiO2. There is little variation in the taper.
4 6 8 10 12 14 160
200
300
400
500
ER - PS
ER - SS
CER - PS
50%
Pore Radius (nm)
Etc
h D
epth
(nm
)
CHF3
4 nm 16 nm10 nm
University of IllinoisOptical and Discharge Physics
HAR PROFILES: INTERCONNECTED PORES
INTELTALK_AS_40
60% 100%0%
Interconnectivity
University of IllinoisOptical and Discharge Physics
EFFECT OF PORE RADIUS ON CLEANING
AVS03_AS_17
Larger pores are harder to clean due to the view angle of ion fluxes.
Unfavorable view angles lead to a smaller delivery of activation energy, hence lower activated polymer sites.
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.00.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
16
4 nm
710
13
Time (Arb Units)
Frac
tion
of R
esid
ual P
olym
er
4 nm 16 nm
ANIMATION SLIDE
Ar/O2=99/1, 40 sccm, 600 W, 4 mTorr
University of IllinoisOptical and Discharge Physics
CLEANING INTERCONNECTED PORES
CHEME_AS_19
Cleaning is inefficient with interconnected pores.
Higher interconnectivity leads to larger shadowing of ions.
60% 100%0%
ANIMATION SLIDE
Interconnectivity Ar/O2=99/1, 40 sccm,
600 W, 4 mTorr
University of IllinoisOptical and Discharge Physics
EFFECT OF ASPECT RATIO ON STRIPPING
AVS03_AS_19
Cleaning decreases with increasing aspect ratios.
Pores at the top of the trench are stripped better due to direct ions (view angle).
Pores near the bottom see ions reflected from the bottom of the trench and are cleaned better.
3
5
1
ANIMATION SLIDE
Aspect Ratio
Ar/O2=99/1, 40 sccm, 600 W, 4 mTorr
4 nm 16 nmNP 10 nm
University of IllinoisOptical and Discharge Physics
EFFECT OF PORE RADIUS ON Cu DEPOSITION
AVS03_AS_20
Surrogate study for seed layer deposition and barrier coating.
Larger pores require longer deposition times for conformal coverage.
This produces thicker bottom and open field films.
Voids are created or initiated by larger pores.
University of IllinoisOptical and Discharge Physics
EFFECT OF INTERCONNECTIVITY ON Cu IMPVD
AVS03_AS_21
Interconnected pores need to be sealed to avoid pin-hole formation.
Pore sealing by Cu IMPVD ineffective at larger interconnectivities.
Thicker layers to seal pores produces trench narrowing, which can lead to pinch off.
30% 100%0% 60%
Interconnectivity
University of IllinoisOptical and Discharge Physics
CONCLUSIONS
Etching of PS obeys scaling laws as that of SS. Etch rate increases for smaller pores and slows for larger pores (at high porosities).
L/a determines etch rate variation of P-SiO2. Polymer filling increases the net thickness.
Stripping is inefficient for interconnected pore networks and for larger pores due to the unfavorable view angles for the ion fluxes. Low aspect ratio pores are better cleaned.
Cu IMPVD is non-conformal for closed pore networks with larger pores. Pin-hole formation and trench narrowing is seen for interconnected networks.
AVS03_AS_22