Avoidance of Aquatic Herbicides by Juvenile Salmonids CA Curran, JM Grassley, LL Conquest, and CE...
-
date post
19-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
1
Transcript of Avoidance of Aquatic Herbicides by Juvenile Salmonids CA Curran, JM Grassley, LL Conquest, and CE...
![Page 1: Avoidance of Aquatic Herbicides by Juvenile Salmonids CA Curran, JM Grassley, LL Conquest, and CE Grue Washington Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062714/56649d3a5503460f94a1492a/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Avoidance of Aquatic Herbicides by Juvenile
Salmonids
CA Curran, JM Grassley, LL Conquest, and CE Grue
Washington Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit
School of Aquatic and Fishery SciencesUniversity of Washington
![Page 2: Avoidance of Aquatic Herbicides by Juvenile Salmonids CA Curran, JM Grassley, LL Conquest, and CE Grue Washington Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062714/56649d3a5503460f94a1492a/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Chemical Regulation Changes Permitting requirements
Chemicals Used Renovate 3 (triclopyr) Reward (diquat) Sonar AS (fluridone)
INTRODUCTION
![Page 3: Avoidance of Aquatic Herbicides by Juvenile Salmonids CA Curran, JM Grassley, LL Conquest, and CE Grue Washington Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062714/56649d3a5503460f94a1492a/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Behavioral Responses and Herbicide Exposure Improve ecological relevance of
toxicity test results Avoidance and attraction
INTRODUCTION
![Page 4: Avoidance of Aquatic Herbicides by Juvenile Salmonids CA Curran, JM Grassley, LL Conquest, and CE Grue Washington Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062714/56649d3a5503460f94a1492a/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Avoidance Test Methods Y-mazes Counter-Current Chambers Laminar Flow Systems
INTRODUCTION
![Page 5: Avoidance of Aquatic Herbicides by Juvenile Salmonids CA Curran, JM Grassley, LL Conquest, and CE Grue Washington Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062714/56649d3a5503460f94a1492a/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
INTRODUCTION
Chemical Clean
Counter-Current Chamber
Chemical Clean
Y-maze
Chemical Clean
Laminar Flow
![Page 6: Avoidance of Aquatic Herbicides by Juvenile Salmonids CA Curran, JM Grassley, LL Conquest, and CE Grue Washington Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062714/56649d3a5503460f94a1492a/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
OBJECTIVE
Do juvenile chinook avoid the herbicides at maximum concentrations and 10 times those concentrations? Renovate 3 (triclopyr): 2.50 and 25.0
ppm Reward (diquat): 1.37 and 13.7 ppm Sonar AS (fluridone): 90 and 900 ppb
![Page 7: Avoidance of Aquatic Herbicides by Juvenile Salmonids CA Curran, JM Grassley, LL Conquest, and CE Grue Washington Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062714/56649d3a5503460f94a1492a/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
METHODS
![Page 8: Avoidance of Aquatic Herbicides by Juvenile Salmonids CA Curran, JM Grassley, LL Conquest, and CE Grue Washington Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062714/56649d3a5503460f94a1492a/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
METHODS
![Page 9: Avoidance of Aquatic Herbicides by Juvenile Salmonids CA Curran, JM Grassley, LL Conquest, and CE Grue Washington Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062714/56649d3a5503460f94a1492a/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
METHODS
![Page 10: Avoidance of Aquatic Herbicides by Juvenile Salmonids CA Curran, JM Grassley, LL Conquest, and CE Grue Washington Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062714/56649d3a5503460f94a1492a/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
45 minute test 0-14 minutes clean water flow 15-30 minutes chemical flow 31-45 minutes clean water flow
Overall design focused on initial response to chemical flow
Digital photos were taken every minute
METHODS
![Page 11: Avoidance of Aquatic Herbicides by Juvenile Salmonids CA Curran, JM Grassley, LL Conquest, and CE Grue Washington Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062714/56649d3a5503460f94a1492a/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
METHODS
![Page 12: Avoidance of Aquatic Herbicides by Juvenile Salmonids CA Curran, JM Grassley, LL Conquest, and CE Grue Washington Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062714/56649d3a5503460f94a1492a/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Scoring method Position as a ratio of tube length, 0
to 1
Inlet Outlet
Mean Fish Position0.50
0.25 0.50 0.75
Minute 14
METHODS
0 1
![Page 13: Avoidance of Aquatic Herbicides by Juvenile Salmonids CA Curran, JM Grassley, LL Conquest, and CE Grue Washington Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062714/56649d3a5503460f94a1492a/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Inlet Outlet
Mean Fish Position0.66
Chemical 0.45 0.60 0.85
Minute 16
Photograph taken each minute (total 45) to calculate mean position
METHODS
![Page 14: Avoidance of Aquatic Herbicides by Juvenile Salmonids CA Curran, JM Grassley, LL Conquest, and CE Grue Washington Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062714/56649d3a5503460f94a1492a/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Data Analysis Paired t-test to compare difference in
mean position by minute blocks 0-14, 15-30, 31-45
Paired t-test to compare difference in slopes of mean positions within minute blocks
Alpha level = 0.10
METHODS
![Page 15: Avoidance of Aquatic Herbicides by Juvenile Salmonids CA Curran, JM Grassley, LL Conquest, and CE Grue Washington Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062714/56649d3a5503460f94a1492a/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
METHODS
0.4
0.5
0.6
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Test Minute
Mea
n P
osit
ion
Avoidance
Clean Flow Period 1
Attraction
Clean Flow Period 3Chemical Flow Period 2
Period 2 Mean Position
Period 1 Mean Position
Theoretical Response - Fast - Assessment by Level
![Page 16: Avoidance of Aquatic Herbicides by Juvenile Salmonids CA Curran, JM Grassley, LL Conquest, and CE Grue Washington Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062714/56649d3a5503460f94a1492a/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
METHODSTheoretical Response - Slow - Assessment by Level
0.4
0.5
0.6
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Test Minute
Mea
n P
osit
ion
Avoidance
Clean Flow Period 1
Attraction
Clean Flow Period 3Chemical Flow Period 2
Period 2 Mean Position
Period 1 Mean Position
![Page 17: Avoidance of Aquatic Herbicides by Juvenile Salmonids CA Curran, JM Grassley, LL Conquest, and CE Grue Washington Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062714/56649d3a5503460f94a1492a/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
METHODSTheoretical Response - Slow - Assessment by Slope
0.4
0.5
0.6
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Test Minute
Mea
n P
osit
ion
Avoidance
Clean Flow Period 1
Attraction
Clean Flow Period 3Chemical Flow Period 2
Period 2 Mean Slope
Period 1 Mean Slope
![Page 18: Avoidance of Aquatic Herbicides by Juvenile Salmonids CA Curran, JM Grassley, LL Conquest, and CE Grue Washington Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062714/56649d3a5503460f94a1492a/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
RESULTS
Calcium Hypochlorite 1.6 ppm
0.300
0.400
0.500
0.600
0.700
0.800
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Test Minute
Mea
n P
osit
ion
Avoidance
Clean Flow Period 1
Attraction
Clean Flow Period 3Chemical Flow Period 2
![Page 19: Avoidance of Aquatic Herbicides by Juvenile Salmonids CA Curran, JM Grassley, LL Conquest, and CE Grue Washington Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062714/56649d3a5503460f94a1492a/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
RESULTS
0.300
0.400
0.500
0.600
0.700
0.800
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Test Minute
Mea
n P
osit
ion
Avoidance
Clean Flow Period 1
Attraction
Clean Flow Period 3Chemical Flow Period 2
Sonar AS 900 ppm
![Page 20: Avoidance of Aquatic Herbicides by Juvenile Salmonids CA Curran, JM Grassley, LL Conquest, and CE Grue Washington Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062714/56649d3a5503460f94a1492a/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
RESULTS
Analysis
Significant?
P-value
Result
1.6 ppm
Slope yes 0.09 Avoidance
1.6 ppm
Position
no 0.12 No Effect
Calcium Hypochlorite
![Page 21: Avoidance of Aquatic Herbicides by Juvenile Salmonids CA Curran, JM Grassley, LL Conquest, and CE Grue Washington Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062714/56649d3a5503460f94a1492a/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
RESULTS
Analysis
Significant?
P-value
Result
2.5 ppm
Slope no 0.50 No Effect
2.5 ppm
Position
no 0.49 No Effect
25 ppm
Slope no 0.77 No Effect
25 ppm
Position
yes 0.07 Attraction
Renovate 3
![Page 22: Avoidance of Aquatic Herbicides by Juvenile Salmonids CA Curran, JM Grassley, LL Conquest, and CE Grue Washington Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062714/56649d3a5503460f94a1492a/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
RESULTS
Analysis
Significant?
P-value
Result
1.37 ppm
Slope no 0.25 No Effect
1.37 ppm
Position
no 0.40 No Effect
13.7 ppm
Slope yes 0.08 Attraction
13.7 ppm
Position
no 0.56 No Effect
Reward
![Page 23: Avoidance of Aquatic Herbicides by Juvenile Salmonids CA Curran, JM Grassley, LL Conquest, and CE Grue Washington Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062714/56649d3a5503460f94a1492a/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
RESULTS
Analysis
Significant?
P-value
Result
90 ppb Slope no 0.40 No Effect
90 ppb Position
no 0.96No Effect
900 ppb
Slope no 0.47 No Effect
900 ppb
Position
no 0.35 No Effect
Sonar AS
![Page 24: Avoidance of Aquatic Herbicides by Juvenile Salmonids CA Curran, JM Grassley, LL Conquest, and CE Grue Washington Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062714/56649d3a5503460f94a1492a/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
CONCLUSIONS
Original methods needed alterations Replication, tube shape, chemical delivery
The apparatus functioned as expected Positive control results
New statistical approach - change in mean position vs categorical tests
Attraction to 10 times the maximum concentration of Renovate and Reward
![Page 25: Avoidance of Aquatic Herbicides by Juvenile Salmonids CA Curran, JM Grassley, LL Conquest, and CE Grue Washington Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062714/56649d3a5503460f94a1492a/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
FUTURE WORK
Examination of olfactory performance following static exposure
Examination of concentrations at time of application and rates of diffusion
Effects of different testing procedures on avoidance/attraction results
![Page 26: Avoidance of Aquatic Herbicides by Juvenile Salmonids CA Curran, JM Grassley, LL Conquest, and CE Grue Washington Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062714/56649d3a5503460f94a1492a/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Funding was provided by Washington State
Department of Ecology, SePro Corporation, and the School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences and the Washington Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit at the University of Washington.
A scholarship from Weed Science Society of America made my participation in this research possible
Facilities provided by USGS’s Marrowstone Marine Station