Aviation Safety Performance: Can it be measured? Corrective actions and how to avoid the frustration...

Aviation Safety Performance: Can it be measured?

Corrective actions and how to avoid the frustration of Sisyphus

5th FSF Conference Nicosia, Cyprus May 15-16, 2014

ADRIAN CIORANUDirector General

What – Why – When – How

Safety Indicators

Focus: ICAO Annex 14

Economic development

Status quo

Solutions

Safety indicators: High levelQuantitative or qualitative, leading (proactive) or lagging (reactive)

Accidents/serious incidentsStatistics regard commercial ops, aircraft MTOW >2’250kg

Global safety reporting culture (ICAO ADREP)

ICAO USOAP: SARPs implementation

Effective State oversight capability

Source: ICAO, STA10, SKYbrary

ICAO Annex 14 & National Regulations

Accidents: Airports

21% Deficiencies in regulatory oversight

23% Threats related to airport facilities:

Contaminated runways/taxiways: 79%

Inadequate RESA: 7%

Poor signage, faint markings: 7%

Airport perimeter control/fencing: 7%Source: IATA, Safety Report 2012

Source: ICAO State of Global Aviation Safety 2013

Source: ACI Economics Report 2013

Economic development

AiMS Swiss company

International team of experts

Leverage strengths & core activity

Foster technical cooperation

Avoid duplication, unnecessary competition

Innovative solutions

Tangible results

Solutions and profit for States & AirportsCost clarity and cost savings

Simplify oversight

Evaluate compliance (CMA)

Manage corrective/preventive actions

Track progress

Optimize resources

Enable technical cooperation

Increase safety & manage costs

Measure. Correct. Monitor. Achieve.

AiMS.

Aviation Safety Performance: Can it be measured? Corrective actions and how to avoid the frustration...

Documents

Transcript of Aviation Safety Performance: Can it be measured? Corrective actions and how to avoid the frustration...