Aviation psychology by dr. clint balog
-
Upload
erauwebinars -
Category
Education
-
view
514 -
download
2
Transcript of Aviation psychology by dr. clint balog
Mid Day tomorrow come to our Webinar!
“Aviation Psychology”
The Webinar will begin at
Noon Eastern Time (USA)
(5 p.m. UTC/GMT)
worldwide.erau.edu/newsroom/free-webinars.html
A few session pointers
• We will use the text chat for questions• You can interact with icons• You control the size of your screen• Emails will be provided at the end• A link to the recording will be emailed to you
Today’s Agenda
• Introductions• Presentation by Dr. Clint Balog• Questions and Answers• The Master of Science in Human Factors• Upcoming Webinars
Dr. Clint Balog
• Asst. Professor, ERAU-Worldwide• Chair of M.S. Human Factors• Aviation professional for 37 years• 8,000 flight hours in fixed wing and
rotorcraft• Ph.D. in Psychology—specializing in
cognitive science, human factors and human performance
• Lives in Western Montana
What is Aviation Psychology?
6
• The application of the principles andconstructs of human psychology to the fieldof aviation.
What is Aviation Psychology?
7
• The application of the principles andconstructs of human psychology to the fieldof aviation.
• One of numerous sub-fields of Aviation Human Factors
Purpose
10
• To develop a detailed, holistic understandingof professional PICs’ experiences of extended, extreme in-flight emergencies which were successfully overcome.
Focus
11
• Cognitive processes in general, and risk assessment, problem solving, anddecision making processes specifically.
Research Question
12
• “How do professional pilots-in-command(PICs) describe the cognitive processes theyemployed in successfully overcoming extended, extreme in-flight emergencies?”
What is Cognitive Psychology?
13
• The study of how people perceive, learn,remember, and think about information(Sternberg & Sternberg, 2012).
What is Cognitive Psychology?
14
• The study of how people perceive, learn,remember, and think about information(Sternberg & Sternberg, 2012).
• Explores the operation of mental processes related to perceiving, attending, thinking, language, and memory mainly through inferences from behavior (VandenBos, 2007, p. 190).
Participant Demographics
19
• Operational experience ranged from very low to very high.
• Single engine piston to multiengine heavy commercial turbojet/turbofan aircraft.
Participant Demographics
20
• Operational experience ranged from very low to very high.
• Single engine piston to multiengine heavy commercial turbojet/turbofan aircraft.
• Emergencies = two each military, corporate, commercial, and private operations.
Results
21
• Eight emergencies resulted in the employment of over 40 definitively identifiable cognitive processes, both simpleand complex.
Results
22
• Eight emergencies resulted in the employment of over 40 definitively identifiable cognitive processes, both simpleand complex.
• Cognitive processing occurred in four generally discernible stages with definable characteristics.
Results
24
• Four stages composed of variations inthree characteristics of the emergency:
1. Pilot’s state of physiological/emotional arousal.
Results
25
• Four stages composed of variations inthree characteristics of the emergency:
1. Pilot’s state of physiological/emotional arousal.
2. Rate of evolution of the emergency.
Results
26
• Four stages composed of variations inthree characteristics of the emergency:
1. Pilot’s state of physiological/emotional arousal.
2. Rate of evolution of the emergency.3. Understanding of immediate operational
needs/impacts of the emergency.
Results
28
• Fours stages intermix based uponcharacteristics of the emergency at anypoint in time.
• Despite differing circumstances, all thepilots studied similarly employed cognitivephases methodically, logically, and in anorganized and generally disciplined manner.
.
Results
30
• A very complex web of both simple and complex cognitive processes were required.
• Decision-making was the principle higher order cognitive process employed; all othercognitive processes (simple and complex) supported of decision-making.
.
Results
32
• The overall process of overcoming these emergencies was, to an extent, error-tolerant.
• The ability to prioritize andcompartmentalize actions proved beneficial,possibly critical.
Results
33
• There were observable levels of both psychological and physiological arousal that proved beneficial that appeared tohave both upper and lower bounds.
Results
34
• There were observable levels of both psychological and physiological arousal that proved beneficial that appeared tohave both upper and lower bounds.
• The pilot’s ability to supplement his ownknowledge with knowledge from outsidethe cockpit proved highly beneficial.
Results
36
• All forms of memory were involved.
• Both bottom-up and top-down processingwere involved.
Results
37
• All forms of memory were involved.
• Both bottom-up and top-down processingwere involved.
• Greater levels of experience and trainingproved very beneficial.
Results
38
• Codifed, associative, and analytic decision models were employed autonomouslybased upon efficiency.
Results
39
• Codifed, associative, and analytic decision models were employed autonomouslybased upon efficiency.
• Multiple forms of risk assessment (riskhomeostasis, zero risk theory, threat avoidance model) were employed autonomously.
Discussion of the Results
40
• Provides insight as to where to focusattention for future research in order tomost efficiently and effectively improvepilot cognitive functioning.
Discussion of the Results
41
• Error-tolerant nature provides optimismthat the ultimate desired results arerealistically achievable across a relativelywide spectrum of pilots.
Discussion of the Results
42
• Provide insight into possible immediate actions to be taken to improve pilotabilities in overcoming these emergencies.
References
43
VandenBos, G. (Ed.). (2007). APA dictionary of psychology (1st ed.). Washington,DC: American Psychological Association.
Sternberg, R. & Sternberg, K. (2012). Cognitive Psychology (6th ed.).Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
Goal
46
Develop graduates qualified to enter the human factors area who are able to support the changing needs of industriesrequiring improved operational efficiency and safety by identifying applications of theory, cultivating innovation, providing leadership and management, and solving challenges associated with all aspects human factors of aviation operations.
Courses
47
• Human Cognition (theory)• Human Performance, Limitation, and Error• Virtual Environments, Simulation, and Robotics• Ergonomics and Biomechanics• Aviation Psychology• Aerospace Physiology• Industrial Applications in Aerospace (operational application)• Crew Platform Automation, Design, and Integration• Cognitive Systems Engineering• Systems Psychology• Human Factors in Complex Systems (operational design)
Description
48
Two Options:
The MSHF will require:• 36 credit hours for the capstone option• 30 credit hours for the thesis option• Will be delivered using all modalities offered by WW.
Two Specializations:
• Aerospace (Operations)• Systems Engineering (Design/Development)
More Information
49
For more information about any of the topics covered in this Webinar, including a copy of the full research report, or information about the ERAU-WW MSHF degree contact Dr. Balog at:
Upcoming Webinars:
• Apr. 14 How to Make Safety Work in Your Company
• May 12 Unmanned Aerospace Systems (UAS)• Jun. 9 Interviewing to Get the Job
worldwide.erau.edu/newsroom/free-webinars.html
Todays Presentation: Dr. Clint Balog
For questions about the webinar series: Bill Gibbs, Webinar Series Coordinator