Autonomous/Automated Automobiles vs. Self-driving Cars/Vehicles vs. Driverless Shuttles/Pods/Podcars

28
CIVITAS FORUM 2016 Sep 28 th 2016 Gdynia, Poland Piotr Marek SMOLNICKI Gdansk University of Technology

Transcript of Autonomous/Automated Automobiles vs. Self-driving Cars/Vehicles vs. Driverless Shuttles/Pods/Podcars

CIVITAS FORUM 2016

Sep 28th 2016

Gdynia, Poland

Piotr Marek SMOLNICKI – Gdansk University of Technology

2

Autonomous/Automated Automobiles

vs.

Self-driving Cars/Vehicles

vs.

Driverless Shuttles/Podcars

Understanding different impacts of each

automated mobility solution on metropolitan

(urban and suburban) spatial structures

CIVITAS Forum 2016 • Sep 28th 2016 • Gdynia • Piotr Marek SMOLNICKI

3

CIVITAS Forum 2016 • Sep 28th 2016 • Gdynia • Piotr Marek SMOLNICKI

AA vs. SV/SC vs. DS/DP – different impacts

Gdynia nowphoto: Author 2014

4

CIVITAS Forum 2016 • Sep 28th 2016 • Gdynia • Piotr Marek SMOLNICKI

AA vs. SV/SC vs. DS/DP – different impacts

Personal Rapid Transit in Gdynia?artist vision: Author 2014

5

AA vs. SV/SC vs. DS/DP – different impacts

But does Gdynia need PRT?

Do other cities need it?

It depends:

• NO – if we consider new expensive infrastructure

• YES – if we consider use of existing infrastructure

• but transport automation brings new opportunities

CIVITAS Forum 2016 • Sep 28th 2016 • Gdynia • Piotr Marek SMOLNICKI

6

AA vs. SV/SC vs. DS/DP – different impacts

What are the conditions right now?

Car-centric development:

• which is justified by promising improvement of personal transport conditions

• but in reality the conditions are getting worse since the car invention

CIVITAS Forum 2016 • Sep 28th 2016 • Gdynia • Piotr Marek SMOLNICKI

7

AA vs. SV/SC vs. DS/DP – different impacts

What paradoxes & non-intuitive laws are related to this problem? Examples:

1. Jevons’ Efficiency Paradox—  in relation to transport is e.g.: electric vehicles

users drive more, thus create bigger environmental impacts (Jevons WS

1866)

2. Braess’ Paradox—  bigger or smaller congestion when, accordingly: adding

new or removing existing part of the road infrastructure (Braess D 1968)

3. Induced Traffic Demand—  the more roads — the bigger traffic (Leeming JJ

1969)

4. Risk Compensation/Peltzman’s Effect—  the more safe you feel — the

bigger risk emerge (Leeming JJ 1969; Peltzman S 1975)

CIVITAS Forum 2016 • Sep 28th 2016 • Gdynia • Piotr Marek SMOLNICKI

8

AA vs. SV/SC vs. DS/DP – different impacts

5. Downs-Thomson Paradox—  investing in individual transport creates

additional traffic by reducing mass transit use (Thomson JM 1972; Downs A

1992)

6. Narrow lane safety—  the narrower lane — the safer road, even without

reducing the capacity (Schwartz S 1988)

7. Lewis-Mogridge Position—  traffic is growing to fulfil road capacity (Lewis D;

Mogridge MJH 1990)

8. Marchetti’s Constant—  the average time travelled is constant for any mode

of transport, due to the different distances passed and scopes operated

(Marchetti C 1994)

CIVITAS Forum 2016 • Sep 28th 2016 • Gdynia • Piotr Marek SMOLNICKI

9

AA vs. SV/SC vs. DS/DP – different impacts

Examples of “traditional” car-centric viewpoints on automation:

• pushing for the creation of dedicated traffic lanes for autonomous

automobiles throughout the 225 km stretch of highway between Seattle and

Vancouver

• ideas of ultra-efficient (scary) automated V2V (vehicle to vehicle) & V2X

(vehicles to infrastructure) crossroads – green light for everybody at once

• free autonomous D2D rides (door to door) to shopping malls outside of the

city centre

CIVITAS Forum 2016 • Sep 28th 2016 • Gdynia • Piotr Marek SMOLNICKI

10

AA vs. SV/SC vs. DS/DP – different impacts

This is why we should distinguish technical & organizational solutions

of automated mobility such as AA-s, SV-s & DS-s

CIVITAS Forum 2016 • Sep 28th 2016 • Gdynia • Piotr Marek SMOLNICKI

11

AA vs. SV/SC vs. DS/DP – different impacts

I. What I understand by Autonomous/Automated Automobiles?

1. It is just an evolution of traditional 1,5 century old model of automobile

2. It still needs the driver (in the meaning of the owner) and steering wheel

3. It does not make any difference between other cars since newer cars have

already safety- and other kind of automation

4. Thus it is just marketing

CIVITAS Forum 2016 • Sep 28th 2016 • Gdynia • Piotr Marek SMOLNICKI

12

AA vs. SV/SC vs. DS/DP – different impacts

Examples for autonomous/automated automobiles:

• Tesla Model S (autopilot software update of an electric but traditional car)

• Mercedes F 015 (AA concept that is still focused on self-ownership or long-

term rent)

• Yanfeng AA (premiere 2017 – user interface presented 2016 in Frankfurt)

• Volvo, Ford, Chrysler, Nissan etc. are preparing their own AAs for the next

2-5 years (all major automotive producers will present AA until around 2020)

CIVITAS Forum 2016 • Sep 28th 2016 • Gdynia • Piotr Marek SMOLNICKI

13

AA vs. SV/SC vs. DS/DP – different impacts

II. What I understand by Self-driving Vehicles/Cars?

1. It is a revolution after 100 years of the same car model

2. It does not need the driver (no driving license needed) nor steering wheel

3. Thus the owner does not need to keep its belonging car with him/her

4. Actually the traveler does not need to own the car – he/she can use it as

todays taxi, ridesharing or car sharing services

CIVITAS Forum 2016 • Sep 28th 2016 • Gdynia • Piotr Marek SMOLNICKI

14

AA vs. SV/SC vs. DS/DP – different impacts

Examples for self-driving vehicles/cars:

• Google has been testing its self-driving car for example in Kirkland,

Washington

• Uber opened the first self-driving fleet in Pittsburgh, USA

• nuTonomy announced a partnership with South East Asia's largest ride-

hailing service, Grab, in order to further expand the reach of fleet of self-

driving vehicles

CIVITAS Forum 2016 • Sep 28th 2016 • Gdynia • Piotr Marek SMOLNICKI

15

AA vs. SV/SC vs. DS/DP – different impacts

III. What I understand by Driverless Shuttles/Pods/Podcars?

1. It fills the on-demand (OD) gap between taxi service and public transit

2. It allows to cover the first/last mile problem

3. It competes with walking and biking

4. But it complement public transit making it cheaper to maintain (no drivers)

CIVITAS Forum 2016 • Sep 28th 2016 • Gdynia • Piotr Marek SMOLNICKI

16

AA vs. SV/SC vs. DS/DP – different impacts

Examples for driverless shuttles/podcars:

• BestMile signs its first commercial project with CarPostal, the company

leading the sector of public transportation in Switzerland. This collaboration

between the EPFL spin-off and the subsidiary of the Swiss Post will allow to

operate driverless shuttles in urban areas

• Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority (LAVTA) introduced two

innovations: partnering with transportation network companies (TNCs),

such as Uber and Lyft, to reach commuters in neighbourhoods big buses

cannot serve, and exploring driverless shuttles to solve first and last mile

issues to connect people to stations

CIVITAS Forum 2016 • Sep 28th 2016 • Gdynia • Piotr Marek SMOLNICKI

17

AA vs. SV/SC vs. DS/DP – different impacts

What future transportation problems do cities have to solve?

CIVITAS Forum 2016 • Sep 28th 2016 • Gdynia • Piotr Marek SMOLNICKI

18

AA vs. SV/SC vs. DS/DP – different impacts

We have stakeholders:

• Chaotic

• Monopolizing

CIVITAS Forum 2016 • Sep 28th 2016 • Gdynia • Piotr Marek SMOLNICKI

19

AA vs. SV/SC vs. DS/DP – different impacts

We need stakeholders:

• Cooperating

• Complementing

CIVITAS Forum 2016 • Sep 28th 2016 • Gdynia • Piotr Marek SMOLNICKI

20

AA vs. SV/SC vs. DS/DP – different impacts

How to solve the problem?

We need to implement Mobility as a Service (MaaS) paradigm

Why?

Because automation is a disruptive innovation that may have significant

negative side effects on functional, physical & socio-economic spatial structures,

as much as on transportation, including personal, group and mass public transit.

CIVITAS Forum 2016 • Sep 28th 2016 • Gdynia • Piotr Marek SMOLNICKI

21

AA vs. SV/SC vs. DS/DP – different impacts

CIVITAS Forum 2016 • Sep 28th 2016 • Gdynia • Piotr Marek SMOLNICKI

What ways do cities can follow? – example of (automated) car-sharing

Source: Author 2016. Car-sharing: The Impact on Metropolitan Spatial Structures

22

AA vs. SV/SC vs. DS/DP – different impacts

CIVITAS Forum 2016 • Sep 28th 2016 • Gdynia • Piotr Marek SMOLNICKI

Examples of shared on-

demand rides on the city

theoretical model:

• Rideshare picks-up 2 or

more passengers on way

• Rideshare prolong it’s

route if its <1,4 length

• Rideshare is

complementing public

transit

Source: Author 2016

Thank you!

Piotr Marek Smolnicki

Contact Details

Gdansk University of Technology

Narutowicza 11/12 Street

80-233 Gdańsk, Poland

[email protected]

http://www.civitas.eu

26

AA vs. SV/SC vs. DS/DP – different impacts

Author’s chosen references

• Smolnicki PM 2016 “Mobility Oriented Development (MOD): Public-Private

Partnership in Urban Parking & Traffic Management with the Use of

Autonomous Automobiles, Car-sharing, Ridesharing Modes of Transport &

Mobility as a Service (MaaS)”. Springer: Happy City: eds Brdulak H, Brdulak A

• Smolnicki PM, Sołtys J 2016 “Car-sharing: The impact on metropolitan spatial

structures”

• Smolnicki PM, Sołtys J 2016 “Driverless Mobility: The Impact on Metropolitan

Spatial Structures”. Elsevier

• Netsch S, Junussova M, Kamrowska-Załuska D, Kiełbińska K, Roszkowska K,

Smolnicki PM 2014 “Rethinking the Water-City Interface: Gdynia and

Waterfront”

CIVITAS Forum 2016 • Sep 28th 2016 • Gdynia • Piotr Marek SMOLNICKI

27

AA vs. SV/SC vs. DS/DP – different impacts

References1. Ackerman, E. (2016). Swiss Considering $3.4 Billion Cargo Tunnel

for Automated Delivery Trucks. Retrieved from http://spectrum.ieee.org/cars-that-think/transportation/infrastructure/swiss-considering-34-billion-cargo-tunnel-for-automated-delivery-trucks/?utm_source=carsthatthink&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=0

2. Alessandrini, A. (2016). CityMobil2 Newsletter: Cities Demonstrating Automated Road Passanger Transport (No. 7). Retrieved from http://www.citymobil2.eu/en/upload/public-docs/CityMobil2%20newsletter%207.pdf

3. Alexander, D., & Abuelsamid, S. (3Q 2015). Autonomous Vehicles: Advanced Driver Assistance Systems and the Evolution of Self-Driving Functionality: Global Market Analysis and Forecasts. Executive Summary (Research Report). Retrieved from Navigant Consulting, Inc. website: http://www.navigantresearch.com

4. Almeida, R., Chin, R. C. C., Huang, A., Karaman, S., & Berlin, J. L. (2016). Reimagine Mobility. Retrieved from http://optimusride.com/

5. Baloh, M., & Parent, M. (2003, December). Modeling and model verification of an intelligent self-balancing two-wheeled vehicle for an autonomous urban transportation system. In The Conference on Computational Intelligence, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems.

6. Berman, B. (2015). Drivers Push Tesla’s Autopilot Beyond Its Abilities: Tesla says its new Autopilot feature is not synonymous with autonomous driving, but some drivers are acting like it is. Retrieved from http://www.technologyreview.com/news/542651/drivers-push-teslas-autopilot-beyond-its-abilities/

7. Bertoncello, M., & Wee, D. (2015). Ten ways autonomous driving could redefine the automotive world. Retrieved from McKinsey & Company website: http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/automotive_and_assembly/ten_wa

ys_autonomous_driving_could_redefine_the_automotive_world

8. Bischoff, J., & Maciejewski, M. (2016). Simulation of City-wide Replacement of Private Cars with Autonomous Taxis in Berlin. Procedia Computer Science, 83, 237–244. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2016.04.121

9. Bridges, R. (2015). Driverless Car Revolution: Buy Mobility, Not Metal(eBook Edition 1.10; Kindle Edition).

10. Campbell, A. (2015). Toward a driverless future with Commissioner Bienkowska. Retrieved from http://www.fiaregion1.com/en/fia_region_1/news/toward-a-driverless-future-with-commissioner-bienkowska.htm

11. COMM/RTD. (2015a). Komisja Europejska : CORDIS : Wiadomości i wydarzenia : Od inteligentnych do świadomych samochodów: podejmowanie wyzwania autonomiczności. Bastiaan Krosse, JeroenPloeg i Almie van Asten z dofinansowanego ze środków UE projektu I-GAME przedstawiają swój projekt i możliwości wdrożenia samochodów bez kierowców. Retrieved from http://cordis.europa.eu/news/rcn/123035_pl.html

12. COMM/RTD. (2015b). Komisja Europejska : CORDIS : Wiadomości i wydarzenia : Bezpieczna i przystępna technologia otwiera drogę do zautomatyzowanego transportu. Retrieved from http://cordis.europa.eu/news/rcn/123057_pl.html

13. COMM/RTD. (2015c). Komisja Europejska : CORDIS : Wiadomości i wydarzenia : Terenowe docieranie się flot bez kierowców. Retrieved from http://cordis.europa.eu/news/rcn/123085_pl.html

14. Davies, A. (2015). Obviously Drivers Are Already Abusing Tesla’s Autopilot. Retrieved from http://www.wired.com/2015/10/obviously-drivers-are-already-abusing-teslas-autopilot/?mbid=social_fb

15. Easymile. Shared transportation for the last mile. Retrieved from http://easymile.com/mobility-solution/

CIVITAS Forum 2016 • Sep 28th 2016 • Gdynia • Piotr Marek SMOLNICKI

28

AA vs. SV/SC vs. DS/DP – different impacts

16. Fagnant, D. J., & Kockelman, K. (2015). Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: Opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 77, 167–181. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2015.04.003

17. Fox, S. (2016). Planning for Density in a Driverless World. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2735148

18. Fraedrich, E., & Lenz, B. (2016a). Societal and Individual Acceptance of Autonomous Driving. In M. Maurer, J. C. Gerdes, B. Lenz, & H. Winner (Eds.), Autonomous Driving (pp. 621–640). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-48847-8_29

19. Fraedrich, E., & Lenz, B. (2016b). Taking a Drive, Hitching a Ride: Autonomous Driving and Car Usage. In M. Maurer, J. C. Gerdes, B. Lenz, & H. Winner (Eds.), Autonomous Driving (pp. 665–685). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-48847-8_31

20. Fraker, G. (2015, November). Technology Disrupting Mobility. MIT Media Lab. Disrupting Mobility Summit, Media Lab Building, Cambridge, MA. Retrieved from https://youtu.be/GJ1w4gO6zqg?list=PLFPx70Od9XB71TyGyWw-MwR-s6fAsKRl0

21. Gao, P., Hensley, R., & Zielke, A. (2014). A road map to the future for the auto industry (McKinsey Quarterly). Retrieved from McKinsey & Company website: http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/manufacturing/a_road_map_to_the_future_for_the_auto_industry

22. GE Look ahead. (2014). 3D printing will disrupt manufacturing: But we will still need today’s model. Retrieved from http://gelookahead.economist.com/3d-printing-will-disrupt-manufacturing-2/

23. Gibbs, S. Could drone-guided robots replace refuse collectors? Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/feb/29/drone-guided-robots-replace-binmen-volvo

24. BestMile. (2015). BestMile has signed its first commercial contract with the major public transport operator in Switzerland | BestMile. Retrieved from https://bestmile.com/2015/11/04/sion/

25. Grush, B., & Niles, J. Getting past the hype: What Gartner’s Technology Hype Cycle teaches us about the autonomous vehicle. thinkinghighways.com, 36–39. Retrieved from http://endofdriving.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/What-Gartner%E2%80%99s-Technology-Hype-Cycle-teaches-us-about-the-autonomous-vehicle.pdf

26. Grush, B., & Niles, J. How Cities can use Autonomous Vehicles to Increase Transit Ridership and Reduce Household Vehicle Ownership.

27. Grush, B. & Niles, J. (2015). Manifesto for the End of Driving. Retrieved from http://endofdriving.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/End-Of-Driving-Manifesto-20150710-Draft-3.pdf

28. Hanley, S. (2016). Autonomous Electric People Pods Coming To European Cities This Year. Retrieved from http://gas2.org/2016/03/20/autonomous-electric-people-pods-coming-to-european-cities-this-year/

29. Hatalska, N. (2016). TrendBook 2016 (Hatalska.com). Gdańsk.

30. Heinrichs, D., & Cyganski, R. (2015). Automated Driving: How It Could Enter Our Cities and How This Might Affect Our Mobility Decisions. disP - The Planning Review, 51(2), 74–79. doi:10.1080/02513625.2015.1064650

31. Hsu, J. (2 Feb2016). Driverless Dutch Bus Takes Passengers on Public Test. Retrieved from http://spectrum.ieee.org/cars-that-think/transportation/self-driving/driverless-dutch-bus-takes-passengers-on-public-test/?utm_source=carsthatthink&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=020316

32. Ingrassia, P., Sage, A., & Shepardson, D. (2016). From Here to Autonomy: How Google is shaping the rules of the driverless road. Retrieved from http://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/autos-driverless/

CIVITAS Forum 2016 • Sep 28th 2016 • Gdynia • Piotr Marek SMOLNICKI

29

AA vs. SV/SC vs. DS/DP – different impacts

33. (2016). Interview with Dimitris Papastergiou Mayor of Trikala (Greece). In CityMobil2 Newsletter. Cities Demonstrating Automated Road Passanger Transport (No. 7).

34. Klein, G. (2014). We Need to Think Bigger About Transit-Oriented Development. Retrieved from http://www.citylab.com/commute/2014/07/we-need-to-think-bigger-about-transit-oriented-development/373838/

35. Lander, E. S., Holdren, J. P., Press, W., Savitz, M., Austin, W. M., Chyba, C.,. . . Predith, A. (2016). Technology and the Future of Cities (Report to the President). Washington D.C. Retrieved from Executive Office of the President; President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) website: http://static1.squarespace.com/static/537a1f91e4b0ccfe943c6bc6/t/56d9fb4101dbaec85ef39fa0/1457126210525/WhiteHouseReport.pdf

36. Levin, M. W., Li, T., Boyles, S. D., & Kockelman, K. A general framework for modeling shared autonomous vehicles. Retrieved from http://www.caee.utexas.edu/prof/kockelman/public_html/TRB16SAVFramework.pdf

37. Mui, C., & Carroll, P. B. (2013). Driverless Cars: Trillions Are Up For Grabs (eBook; Kindle Edition) (Original work published March 2013).

38. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Preliminary Statement of Policy Concerning Automated Vehicles. Retrieved from http://www.nhtsa.gov/staticfiles/rulemaking/pdf/Automated_Vehicles_Policy.pdf

39. Neckermann, L. (2015). The Mobility Revolution: Zero Emissions, Zero Accidents, Zero Ownership (eBook; Kindle Edition): Matador.

40. O’Sullivan, F. (2015). U.K. City Is Designing a Future of Fewer Cars — By Focusing on Its Roads: Densifying Milton Keynes thinks autonomous pods, not trains, are the answer. Retrieved from https://nextcity.org/features/view/driverless-cars-future-cities-milton-keynes

41. O'Toole, R. (2016). Transit is dead. Let’s prepare for the next mobility revolution. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/in-

theory/wp/2016/03/01/transit-is-dead-lets-prepare-for-the-next-mobility-revolution/

42. Peters, A. (04.28.16). Driverless Buses Are Coming To Public-Transit-Phobic Beverly Hills: A planned network of self-driving electric shuttles will pick you up wherever, whenever you want. Retrieved from http://www.fastcoexist.com/3059236/driverless-buses-are-coming-to-public-transit-phobic-beverly-hills

43. Ratti, C., & Claudel, M. (2015). Full speed ahead: How the driverless car could transform cities (Global Infrastructure Initiative). Retrieved from McKinsey & Company website: http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/sustainability/full_speed_ahead_how_the_driverless_car_could_transform_cities

44. Renn, A. M. (2016). Self-driving cars will change more than just traffic. Here’s why. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/in-theory/wp/2016/03/04/self-driving-cars-will-change-more-than-just-traffic-heres-why/

45. S. W. (2015). Why autonomous and self-driving cars are not the same. Retrieved from http://www.economist.com/blogs/economist-explains/2015/07/economist-explains?fsrc=scn%2Ffb%2Fwl%2Fee%2Fst%2Fautonomousselfdrivingcarsexplainer

46. Schwartz, S. I. (2015). Street smart: The rise of cities and the fall of cars (First edition; eBook; Kindle Edition). New York: Public Affairs.

47. Singapore-MIT Alliance for Research and Technology (SMART). Future Urban Mobility (FM) IRG. Retrieved from http://smart.mit.edu/research/future-urban-mobility/future-urban-mobility.html

48. Smolnicki, P. M., & Sołtys, J. (2016). Driverless Mobility: The Impact on Metropolitan Spatial Structures. Manuscript, Gdańsk.

CIVITAS Forum 2016 • Sep 28th 2016 • Gdynia • Piotr Marek SMOLNICKI

30

AA vs. SV/SC vs. DS/DP – different impacts

49. Stupp, C. (2015). Autonomous driving takes back seat as connected car rules prepared. Retrieved from http://www.euractiv.com/sections/infosociety/autonomous-driving-takes-back-seat-prep-work-eu-connected-car-law-gets-under

50. Sullivan, P. (2015). Getting Ready for Driverless Cars: Everything you need to know to invest now in the companies developing the technology that will revolutionize the way we commute (eBook; Kindle Edition).

51. Tachet, R., Santi, P., Sobolevsky, S., Reyes-Castro, L. I., Frazzoli, E., Helbing, D., & Ratti, C. Revisiting street intersections using slot-based systems.

52. Templeton, B. The Future of Mass/Public Transit. Retrieved from http://www.templetons.com/brad/robocars/future-transit.html

53. Templeton, B. (2013). No, the car sharing aspect of robocars isn't as exciting as people hope. Retrieved from http://ideas.4brad.com/no-car-sharing-aspect-robocars-isnt-exciting-people-hope

54. Trulls, E., Murtra, A. C., Pérez‐Ibarz, J., Ferrer, G., Vasquez, D., Mirats‐Tur, J. M., & Sanfeliu, A. (2011). Autonomous navigation for mobile service robots in urban pedestrian environments. Journal of Field Robotics, 28. doi:10.1002/rob.20386

55. Upsetting the Apple car: The established carmakers, not tech firms, will win the race to build the vehicles of the future. From the print edition. (2015). Retrieved from http://www.economist.com/news/business/21644149-established-carmakers-not-tech-firms-will-win-race-build-vehicles

56. Volvo Car Group (Volvo). (2015). US urged to establish nationwide Federal guidelines for autonomous driving. Press Release. Retrieved from https://www.media.volvocars.com/global/en-gb/media/pressreleases/167975/us-urged-to-establish-nationwide-federal-guidelines-for-autonomous-driving

57. Wachenfeld, W., Winner, H., Gerdes, J. C., Lenz, B., Maurer, M., Beiker, S.,. . . Winkle, T. (2016). Use Cases for Autonomous Driving. In M. Maurer, J. C. Gerdes, B. Lenz, & H. Winner (Eds.), Autonomous

Driving (pp. 9–37). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-48847-8_2

58. Wadud, Z. Self-Driving Cars: Will they reduce energy use? (Mobility & Energy Futures Series).

59. Wadud, Z., MacKenzie, D., & Leiby, P. (2016). Help or hindrance?: The travel, energy and carbon impacts of highly automated vehicles. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 86, 1–18. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2015.12.001

60. Wagner, F. (2015). Technologietrends - Was steckt hinter »Industrie4.0«, »IT-Sicherheit« oder »autonomen Systemen«? (Technologievorsprung sichern). Stuttgart. Retrieved from FraunhoferIAO website: http://www.rdm.iao.fraunhofer.de/content/dam/iao/rdm/de/documents/01-Prof_Wagner-Technologietrends.pdf

61. Wallace, E. (2016). Driverless Cars. Retrieved from http://www.star-telegram.com/cars/ed-wallace/article80123152.html

62. Warnecke, W., MacKenzie, D., & Surender, S. (2015, November). The Future of Mobility: Is Personal Car Ownership a Thing of the Past? Jenkins, J. EnergyChat Webinar,

63. Warren, T. (2016). This autonomous, 3D-printed bus starts giving rides in Washington, DC today. Retrieved from http://www.theverge.com/2016/6/16/11952072/local-motors-3d-printed-self-driving-bus-washington-dc-launch

64. Wayner, P. C. (Kindle edition 2015; Printed edition 2015). Future Ride v2: 99 Ways the Self-Driving, Autonomous Car Will Change Everything from Buying Groceries to Teen Romance to Surviving a Hurricane to … Home to Simply Getting From Here to There (Kindle edition; 2 edition). Future Ride: Create Space Independent Publishing Platform (Original work published Jul 8, 2013).

65. Why cars and cities are a bad match. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/in-theory/wp/2016/03/02/buses-and-trains-thats-what-will-solve-congestion/

CIVITAS Forum 2016 • Sep 28th 2016 • Gdynia • Piotr Marek SMOLNICKI