Automated Transactions v. Community Bank of Bergen County

download Automated Transactions v. Community Bank of Bergen County

of 40

Transcript of Automated Transactions v. Community Bank of Bergen County

  • 7/28/2019 Automated Transactions v. Community Bank of Bergen County

    1/40

    Daniel A. SuckermanTannenbaum HelpemSyracuse & Hirschtritt LLP900 Third A venueNew York, New York 10022(212) 508-6700Attorney for PlaintiffAutomated Transactions LLC

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THEDISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY-------------------------------------------------------------------------- )(

    AUTOMATED TRANSACTIONS LLC,Plaintiff,- v.-

    COMMUNITY BANK OF BERGEN COUNTY,Defendant.

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ) (

    COMPLAINT

    Civil Action No.___

    COMPLAINT ANDDEMAND FOR JURY

    TRIAL.

    Plaintiff Automated Transactions LLC ("Automated Transactions") alleges as follows:PARTIES

    1. Automated Transactions is a limited liability company organized and ellistingunder the laws of the state ofDelaware, having a principal place ofbusiness at 2711 CentervilleRoad, Suite 400, Wilmington, DE 19808.

    2. Upon information and belief, Community Bank ofBergen County ("Community'')is a state or federally chartered savings bank with a principal place of business at 125 WestPleasant Avenue, Maywood, NJ 7607.

    975858

    Case 2:33-av-00001 Document 17280 Filed 02/15/13 Page 1 of 40 PageID: 395231

  • 7/28/2019 Automated Transactions v. Community Bank of Bergen County

    2/40

    NATURE OF ACTION3. This is an action for patent infringement pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 101, et. seq.

    JURISDICTION AND VENUE

    4. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter ofthis action pursuant to 28U.S.C. 1331 and 1338.

    5. Venue is proper in this judicial district under 28 U.S.C. 1391 and 1400(b). FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF

    6. On August 18,2009, U.S. Patent No. 7,575,158 (the '"158 patent") was duly andlegally issued to David M. Barcelou. A true and correct copy of the '158 patent is attached heretoas Exhibit A.

    7. By license, Automated Transactions is the exclusive licensee of the '158 patentwith the right to sue for past and future infringement and collect damages therefore in its ownname.

    8. The '158 patentdiscloses and claims, among other things, integrated banking andtransaction machines. Claims 1-3, 11-13 and 15 state as follows:

    I. An integrated banking and transaction machine for use by aconsumer to purchase access to retail ATM services, comprising:an automated teller machine;a user interface to the automated teller machine;means for identifying the user to the automated teller machine,further comprising a smart card/magnetic stripe reader/encoder anda sensor;an Internet interface to an Internet connection to the automatedteller machine that uses encryption services and security services to

    2

    Case 2:33-av-00001 Document 17280 Filed 02/15/13 Page 2 of 40 PageID: 395232

  • 7/28/2019 Automated Transactions v. Community Bank of Bergen County

    3/40

    provide the user access to the user interface and retail ATMservice; andaccess to the automated teller machine user interface whereuponthe consumer may selectively dispense currency using theintegrated banking and transaction machine providing the retailATM service;wherein the consumer can purchase access to the retail ATMservice through use of the user interface and Internet servicesconnections.2. The integrated banking and transaction machine according to claim1, further comprising means for consummating the purchase withcash.3. The integrated banking and transaction machine according to claim1, further comprising means for consummating the purchase withbills.11. The integrated banking and transaction machine according toclaim 1, further comprising means for consummating the purchasewith a credit card.12. The integrated banking and transaction machine according toclaim 1, further comprising means for consummating the purchasewith a debit card.13. The integrated banking and transaction machine according toclaim 1, further comprising means for consummating the purchasewith a stored value card.15. The integrated banking and transaction machine according toclaim 1, further comprising means for consummating the purchasewith an identification card

    9. Community is using ATMs within this judicial district which incorporate everyelement of the above claims or substantial equivalents thereof Therefore, Community is directlyor indirectly infringing at least the above claims of the '158 patent, either literally or under thedoctrine of equivalents, and is liable for infringement of the '158 patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C.271.

    3

    Case 2:33-av-00001 Document 17280 Filed 02/15/13 Page 3 of 40 PageID: 395233

  • 7/28/2019 Automated Transactions v. Community Bank of Bergen County

    4/40

    10. Community was made aware of the '158 patent and Community's infringementthereofby a letter sent to the Bank on about February 15, 2013 addressed to Peter A. Michelotti,President.

    11. Community also provides the above A TMs for use by customers and others withinthis judicial district, and provides those customers and others with detailed explanations,instructions and information as to arrangements, applications and uses ofthese ATMs thatpromote and demonstrate how to use these ATMs in an infringing manner. These acts constituteinducement to infringe the above claims of the '158 patent, either literally or under the doctrineof equivalents, whenever a customer uses one of the above ATMs to purchase access to retailATM services through the use of the user interface and Internet service connections. Communityis therefore liable for inducing infringement of the '158 patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 271.

    12. Community's actions in infringing the '158 patent have been, and continue to be,willful, deliberate and/or in conscious disregard to the rights ofAutomated Transactions, makingthis an exceptional case within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. 285.

    13. Community's infringement ofthe '158 patent has caused and continues to causeirreparable harm to Automated Transactions in an amount to be proven at trial. The infringementof the '158 patent by Community will continue unless enjoined by this Court.

    SECOND CLAIM FORRELIEF

    14. On October 6, 2009, U.S. Patent No. 7,597,248 (the '"248 patent") was duly andlegally issued to David M. Barcelou. A true and correct copy of the '248 patent is attached heretoas Exhibit B.

    4

    Case 2:33-av-00001 Document 17280 Filed 02/15/13 Page 4 of 40 PageID: 395234

  • 7/28/2019 Automated Transactions v. Community Bank of Bergen County

    5/40

    15. By license, Automated Transactions is the exclusive licensee of the '248 patentwith the right to sue for past and future infringement and collect damages therefore in its ownname.

    16. The '248 patent discloses and claims, among other things, integrated banking andtransaction machines. Claims 1-3, 5, 11-13 and 15 state as follows:

    1. An integrated banking and transaction machine for use by aconsumer to purchase access to retail ATM services, comprising:an automated teller machine; a user interface to the automated teller machine;means for identifying the user to the automated teller machine,further comprising a smart card/magnetic stripe reader/encoder anda sensor;network services to financial network connections to the automatedteller machine that uses encryption services and security services toprovide the user access to the user interface and retail ATMservice; andaccess to the automated teller machine user interface whereuponthe consumer may selectively dispense cash using the integratedbanking and transaction machine providing the retail ATM service;wherein the consumer can purchase access to the retail ATMservice through use ofthe user interface and fmancial networkconnections.2. The integrated banking and transaction machine according to claim1, further comprising means for consunnnating the purchase withcash.3. The integrated banking and transaction machine according to claim1, further comprising means for consunnnating the purchase withbills.5. The integrated banking and transaction machine according to claim1, further comprising means for consunnnating the purchase withcurrency.

    5

    Case 2:33-av-00001 Document 17280 Filed 02/15/13 Page 5 of 40 PageID: 395235

  • 7/28/2019 Automated Transactions v. Community Bank of Bergen County

    6/40

    11. The integrated banking and transaction machine according toclaim 1, further comprising means for consummating the purchasewith a credit card.

    12. The integrated banking and transaction machine according toclaim 1, further comprising means for consummating the purchasewith a debit card.13. The integrated banking and transaction machine according toclaim 1, further comprising means for consummating the purchasewith a stored value card.15. The integrate;d banking and transaction machine according toclaim 1, further comprising means for consummating the purchasewith an identification card.

    17. Community is using ATMs within this judicial district which incorporate everyelement of the above claims or substantial equivalents thereof. Therefore, Community is directlyor indirectly infringing at least the above claims of the '248 patent, either literally or under thedoctrine of equivalents, and is liable for inmngement of the '248 patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C.271.

    18. Community was made aware of the '248 patent and Community's infringementthereof by a letter sent to the Bank on about February 15, 2013 addressed to Peter A. Michelotti,President.

    19. Community also provides the above ATMs for use by customers and others withinthis judicial district, and provides those customers and others with detailed explanations,instructions and information as to arrangements, applications and uses of these ATMs thatpromote and demonstrate how to use these ATMs in an infringing marmer. These acts constituteinducement to infringe the above claims of the '248 patent, either literally or under the doctrineof equivalents, whenever a customer uses one of the above A TMs to purchase access to retail

    6

    Case 2:33-av-00001 Document 17280 Filed 02/15/13 Page 6 of 40 PageID: 395236

  • 7/28/2019 Automated Transactions v. Community Bank of Bergen County

    7/40

    ATM services through the use of the user interface and financial network connections.Connnunity is therefore liable for inducing infringement of the '248 patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C.271.

    20. Connnunity's actions in infringing the '248 patent have been, and continue to be,willful, deliberate ami/or in conscious disregard to the rights ofAutomated Transactions, makingthis an exceptional case within the meaning of35 U.S.C. 285.

    21. Connnunity's infringement of the '248 patent has caused and continues to causeirreparable harm to Automated Transactions in an amount to be proven at trial. The infringement

    of the '248 patent by Connnunity will continue unless enjoined by this Court.THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF

    22. On October 13, 2009, U.S. Patent No. 7,600,677 (the "'677 patent") was duly andlegally issued to David M. Barcelou. A true and correct copy of the '677 patent is attached heretoas Exhibit C.

    23. By license, Automated Transactions is the exclusive licensee of the '677 patentwith the right to sue for past and future infringement and collect damages therefore in its ownname.

    24. The '677 patent discloses and claims, among other things, integrated banking andtransaction machines. Claims 1-3, 5, 11-13 and 15 state as follows:

    1. An integrated banking and transaction machine for use by aconsumer to purchase access to retail ATM services, comprising:an automated teller machine;a user interface to the automated teller machine;

    7

    Case 2:33-av-00001 Document 17280 Filed 02/15/13 Page 7 of 40 PageID: 395237

  • 7/28/2019 Automated Transactions v. Community Bank of Bergen County

    8/40

    means for identif'ying the user to the automated teller machine,further comprising a smart card/magnetic stripe reader/encoder anda sensor;an Internet interface to the World Wide Web to the automatedteller machine that uses encryption services and security services toprovide the user access to the user interface and retail ATMservice; andaccess to the automated teller machine user interface whereuponthe consumer may selectively dispense currency using theintegrated banking and transaction machine providing the retailATM service;wherein the consumer can purchase access to the retail ATMservice through use of the user interface and World Wide Webconnections.2. The integrated banking and transaction machine according to claim1, further comprising means for consummating the purchase withcash.3. The integrated banking and transaction machine according to claim1, further comprising means for consummating the purchase withbills.5. The integrated banking and transaction machine according to claim1, further comprising means for consummating the purchase withcurrency.11. The integrated banking and transaction machine according toclaim 1, further comprising means for consummating the purchasewith a credit card.12. The integrated banking and transaction machine according toclaim 1, further comprising means for consummating the purchasewith a debit card.13. The integrated banking and transaction machine according toclaim 1, further comprising means for consummating the purchasewith a stored value card.15.The integrated banking and transaction machine according toclaim 1, further comprising means for consummating the purchasewith an identification card.

    8

    Case 2:33-av-00001 Document 17280 Filed 02/15/13 Page 8 of 40 PageID: 395238

  • 7/28/2019 Automated Transactions v. Community Bank of Bergen County

    9/40

    25. Community is using ATMs within this judicial district which incorporate everyelement of the above claims or substantial equivalents thereof. Therefore, Community is directly

    or indirectly infringing at least the above claims of the '677 patent, either literally or under thedoctrine of equivalents, and is liable for infringement of the '677 patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C.271.

    26. Community was made aware of the '677 patent and Community's infringementthereofby a letter sent to the Bank on about February 15,2013 addressed to Peter A. Michelotti,President.

    27. Community also provides the above ATMs for use by customers and others withinthis judicial district, and provides those customers and others with detailed explanations,instructions and information as to arrangements, applications and uses of these ATMs thatpromote and demonstrate how to use these ATMs in an infringing manner. These acts constituteinducement to infringe the above claims of the '677 patent, either literally or under the doctrineof equivalents, whenever a customer uses one of the above ATMs to purchase access to retailATM services through the use of the user interface and World Wide Web connections.Community is therefore liable for inducing infringement of the '677 patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C.271.

    28. Community's actions in infringing the '677 patent have been, and continue to be,willful, deliberate and/or in conscious disregard to the rights ofAutomated Transactions, makingthis an exceptional case within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. 285.

    9

    Case 2:33-av-00001 Document 17280 Filed 02/15/13 Page 9 of 40 PageID: 395239

  • 7/28/2019 Automated Transactions v. Community Bank of Bergen County

    10/40

    29. Community's infringement of the '677 patent has caused and continues to causeirreparable harm to Automated Transactions in an amount to be proven at trial. The infringementof he '677 patent by Community will continue unless enjoined by this Court.

    FOURTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF

    30. On April20, 2010, U.S. Patent No. 7,699,220 (the "'220 patent") was duly andlegally issued to David M. Barcelou. A true and correct copy of the '220 patent is attached heretoas Exhibit D.

    31. By license, Automated Transactions is the exclusive licensee of the '220 patentwith the right to sue for past and future infringement and collect damages therefore in its ownname.

    32. The '220 patent discloses and claims, among other things, integrated banking andtransaction machines. Claims 1-3,41-43,48, 50 and 88 state as follows:

    1. An automated retail terminal for use by a consumer to purchasefrom a banking or commercial ATM provider, cash access services,comprising:an automated teller machine;an Internet interface to the automated teller machine for providingthe user with services for immediately realizing access todispensable currency;a user interface to the automated teller machine;means for identifying the user to the automated teller machine;network services to the automated teller machine that includeencryption services, security services and at least one ATMnetwork connection;and means for selectively dispensing at least one form ofdispensable currency using the automated teller machine videocommand or control touchscreen;

    10

    Case 2:33-av-00001 Document 17280 Filed 02/15/13 Page 10 of 40 PageID: 395240

  • 7/28/2019 Automated Transactions v. Community Bank of Bergen County

    11/40

    where the consumer may purchase cash access services through theuse of the user interface and the ATM network connection, incombination with Intranet services, Internet services or the WorldWide Web on the Internet.2. The automated retail terminal according to claim 1, furthercomprising means for accepting cash, checks or removable mediadeposits.3. The automated retail terminal according to claim 1, furthercomprising means for check cashing by use of coins, cash or encodingdevices.41. The automated retail terminal for use by a consumer to purchasefrom a banking or commercial ATM provider cash access servicesaccording to claim I, where, the consumer may consummate thepurchase by means of the use of a credit card.42. The automated retail terminal for use by a consumer to purchasefrom a banking or commercial ATM provider cash access servicesaccording to claim 1, where, the consumer may consummate thepurchase by means of the use of a debit card.43. The automated retail terminal for use by a consumer to purchasefrom a banking or commercial ATM provider cash access servicesaccording to claim 1, where, the consumer may consummate thepurchase by means of the use of a stored value card.48. The automated retail terminal foruse by a consumer topurchase from a banking or commercial ATM provider cash accessservices according to claim 1, where, the consumer may consummatethe purchase by means of the use of an identification card.50. The automated retail terminal for use by a consumer topurchase from a banking or commercial ATM provider cash accessservices according to claim 1, where, the consumer may consummatethe purchase by means of the use of a check cashing service.88. Integrated banking and transaction apparatus for use by aconsumer, comprising:an automated teller machine; and

    11

    Case 2:33-av-00001 Document 17280 Filed 02/15/13 Page 11 of 40 PageID: 395241

  • 7/28/2019 Automated Transactions v. Community Bank of Bergen County

    12/40

    means for providing a retail transaction to the consumer through anInternet interface and an Intranet service to the automated tellermachine.

    33. Community is using ATMs within this judicial district which incorporate everyelement of the above claims or substantial equivalents thereof. Therefore, Community is directlyor indirectly infringing at least the above claims of the '220 patent, either literally or under thedoctrine of equivalents, and is liable for infringement of the '220 patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C.271.

    34. Community wasmade aware of the '220 patent and Community's infringementthereofby a letter sent to the Bank on about February 15, 2013 addressed to Peter A. Michelotti,President.

    35. Community also provides the above ATMs for use by customers and others withinthis judicial district, and provides those customers and others with detailed explanations,instructions and information as to arrangements, applications and uses of these A TMs thatpromote and demonstrate how to use these ATMs in an infringing manner. These acts constituteinducement to infringe the above claims of the '220 patent, either literally or under the doctrineof equivalents, whenever a customer uses one of the above ATMs to purchase access to retailATM services through the use of the user interface and Internet service connections. Communityis therefore liable for inducing infringement of the '220 patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 271.

    36. Community's actions in infringing the '220 patent have been, and continue to be,willful, deliberate and/or in conscious disregard to the rights ofAutomated Transactions, makingthis an exceptional case within the meaning of35 U.S.C. 285.

    12

    Case 2:33-av-00001 Document 17280 Filed 02/15/13 Page 12 of 40 PageID: 395242

  • 7/28/2019 Automated Transactions v. Community Bank of Bergen County

    13/40

    37. Community's infringement of the '220 patent has caused and continues to causeirreparable harm to Automated Transactions in an amount to be proven at trial. The infringementof the '220 patent by Community will continue unless enjoined by this Court.

    FIFTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF

    38. On August 11, 2009, U.S. Patent No. 7,571,850 (the "'850 patent") was duly andlegally issued to David M. Barcelou. A true and correct copy of the '850 patent is attached heretoas Exhibit E.

    39. By license, Automated Transactions is the exclusive licensee of the '850 patentwith the right to sue for past and future infringement and collect damages therefore in its ownname.

    40. The '850 patent discloses and claims, among other things, integrated banking andtransaction machines. Claims 1-3, 11-13 and 15 state as follows:

    1. An integrated banking and transaction machine for use by aconsumer to purchase access to retail ATM services, comprising:an automated teller machine;a user interface to the automated teller machine; means foridentifying the user to the automated teller machine, furthercomprising a smart card/magnetic stripe reader/encoder and asensor;an Internet interface to an Intranet connection to the automatedteller machine that uses encryption services and security services toprovide the user access to the user interface and retail ATMservice;and access to the automated teller machine user interfacewhereupon the consumer may selectively dispense encodable creditusing the integrated banking and transaction machine providing theretail ATM service;wherein the consumer can purchase access to the retail ATMservice through use of the user interface, Intranet and Internetconnections.

    13

    Case 2:33-av-00001 Document 17280 Filed 02/15/13 Page 13 of 40 PageID: 395243

  • 7/28/2019 Automated Transactions v. Community Bank of Bergen County

    14/40

    2. The integrated banking and transaction machine according toclaim 1, further comprising means for consummating the purchasewith cash.

    3. The integrated banking and transaction machine according toclaim 1, further comprising means for consummating the purchasewith bills.11. The integrated banking and transaction machine according toclaim 1, further comprising means for consummating the purchasewith a credit card.12. The integrated banking and transaction machine according toclaim 1, further comprising means for consummating the purchasewith a debit card.13. The integrated banking and transaction machine according toclaim 1, further comprising means for consummating the purchasewith a stored value card.15. The integrated banking and transaction machine according toclaim 1, further comprising means for consummating the purchasewith an identification card.

    41. Community is using ATMs within this judicial district which incorporate everyelement of the above claims or substantial equivalents thereof. Therefore, Community is directlyor indirectly infringing at least the above claims of the '850 patent, either literally or under thedoctrine of equivalents, and is liable for infringement of the '850 patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C.271.

    42. Community was made aware of the '850 patent and Community's infringementthereofby a letter sent to the Bank on about February 15, 2013 addressed to Peter A. Michelotti,President.

    43. Community also provides the above ATMs for use by customers and others withinthis judicial district, and provides those customers and others with detailed explanations,

    14

    Case 2:33-av-00001 Document 17280 Filed 02/15/13 Page 14 of 40 PageID: 395244

  • 7/28/2019 Automated Transactions v. Community Bank of Bergen County

    15/40

    instructions and information as to arrangements, applications and uses of these ATMs thatpromote and demonstrate how to use these ATMs in an infringing manner. These acts constituteinducement to infringe the above claims of the '850 patent, either literally or under the doctrineof equivalents, whenever a customer uses one of the above ATMs to purchase access to retailATM services through the use of the user interface, Intranet and Internet service connections.Community is therefore liable for inducing infringement of the '850 patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C.271.

    44. Community's actions in infringing the '850 patent have been, and continue to be,willful, deliberate and/or in conscious disregard to the rights ofAutomated Transactions, makingthis an exceptional case within the meaning of35 U.S.C. 285.

    45. Community's infringement of the '850 patent has caused and continues to causeirreparable harm to Automated Transactions in an amount to be proven at trial. The infringementof the '850 patent by Community will continue unless enjoined by this Court.

    SIXTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF

    46. On September 22,2009, U.S. Patent No. 7,591,420 (the '"420 patent") was dulyand legally issued to David M. Barcelou. A true and correct copy of the '420 patent is attachedhereto as Exhibit F.

    47. By license, Automated Transactions is the exclusive licensee of the '420 patentwith the right to sue for past and future infringement and collect damages therefore in its ownname.

    48. The '420 patent discloses and claims, among other things, integrated banking andtransaction machines. Claims 1-3, 11-13 and 15 state as follows:

    15

    Case 2:33-av-00001 Document 17280 Filed 02/15/13 Page 15 of 40 PageID: 395245

  • 7/28/2019 Automated Transactions v. Community Bank of Bergen County

    16/40

    1. An integrated banking and transaction machine for use by aconsumer to purchase access to retail ATM services, comprising:an automated teller machine;a user interface to the automated teller machine;means for identifying the user to the automated teller machine,further comprising a smart card/magnetic stripe reader/encoder anda sensor;an Internet interface to an Intranet connection to the automatedteller machine that uses encryption services and security services toprovide the user access to the user interface and retail ATMservice;and access to the automated teller machine user interfacewhereupon the consumer may selectively dispense encodablecurrency using the integrated banking and transaction machineproviding the retail ATM service;wherein the consumer can purchase access to the retail ATMservice through use of the user interface, Intranet and Internetconnections.2. The integrated banking and transaction machine according toclaim I, further comprising means for consummating the purchasewith cash.3. The integrated banking and transaction machine according toclaim I, further comprising means for consummating the purchasewith bills.11. The integrated banking and transaction machine according toclaim I, further comprising means for consummating the purchasewith a credit card.12. The integrated banking and transaction machine according toclaim I, further comprising means for consummating the purchasewith a debit card.13. The integrated banking and transaction machine according toclaim 1, further comprising means for consummating the purchasewith a stored value card.

    16

    Case 2:33-av-00001 Document 17280 Filed 02/15/13 Page 16 of 40 PageID: 395246

  • 7/28/2019 Automated Transactions v. Community Bank of Bergen County

    17/40

    15. The integrated banking and transaction machine according toclaim 1, further comprising means for consummating the purchasewith an identification card.

    49. Community is using ATMs within this judicial district which incorporate everyelement of the above claims or substantial equivalents thereof. Therefore, Community is directlyor indirectly infringing at least the above claims of the '420 patent, either literally or under thedoctrine of equivalents, and is liable for infringement of the '420 patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C.271.

    50. Community was made aware of the '420 patent and Community's infringementthereof by a letter sent to the Bank on about February 15, 2013 addressed to Peter A. Michelotti,President.

    51. Community also provides the above ATMs for use by customers and others withinthis judicial district, and provides those customers and others with detailed explanations,instructions and information as to arrangements, applications and uses of hese ATMs thatpromote and demonstrate how to use these ATMs in an infringing manner. These acts constituteinducement to infringe the above claims of the '420 patent, either literally or under the doctrineof equivalents, whenever a customer uses one of the above A TMs to purchase access to retailATM services through the use of the user interface, Intranet and Internet service connections.Community is therefore liable for inducing infringement of the '420 patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C.271.

    52. Community's actions in infringing the '420 patent have been, and continue to be,willful, deliberate and/or in conscious disregard to the rights ofAutomated Transactions, makingthis an exceptional case within the meaning of35 U.S.C. 285.

    17

    Case 2:33-av-00001 Document 17280 Filed 02/15/13 Page 17 of 40 PageID: 395247

  • 7/28/2019 Automated Transactions v. Community Bank of Bergen County

    18/40

    53. Community's infringement of the '420 patent has caused and continues to causeirreparable harm to Automated Transactions in an amount to be proven at trial. The infringementof the '420 patent by Community will continue unless enjoined by this Court.

    SEVENTH CLAIM FORRELIEF54. On October 6, 2009, U.S. Patent No. 7,597,251 (the '"251 patent") was duly and

    legally issued to David M. Barcelou. A true and correct copy of the '251 patent is attached heretoas Exhibit G.

    55. By license, Automated Transactions is the exclusive licensee of the '251 patentwith the right to sue for past and future infringement and collect damages therefore in its ownname.

    56. The '251 patent discloses and claims, among other things, integrated banking andtransaction machines. Claims 1 ~ 3 , 11-13 and 15 state as follows:

    1. An integrated banking and transaction machine for use by aconsumer to purchase access to retail ATM services, comprising:an automated teller machine;a user interface to the automated teller machine;means for identifying the user to the automated teller machine,further comprising a smart card/magnetic stripe reader/encoder anda sensor;network services to wireless network connections to the automatedteller machine that use encryption services and security services toprovide the user access to the user interface and retail ATMservtce;and access to the automated teller machine user interfacewhereupon the consumer may selectively dispense cash using theintegrated banking and transaction machine providing the retailATM service;

    18

    Case 2:33-av-00001 Document 17280 Filed 02/15/13 Page 18 of 40 PageID: 395248

  • 7/28/2019 Automated Transactions v. Community Bank of Bergen County

    19/40

    wherein the consumer can purchase access to the retail ATMservice through use of the user interface and wireless networkconnections.2. The integrated banking and transaction machine according toclaim 1, further comprising means for consurrnnating the purchasewith cash.3. The integrated banking and transaction machine according toclaim 1, further comprising means for consummating the purchasewith bills.II. The integrated banking and transaction machine according toclaim 1, further comprising means for consurrnnating the purchasewith a credit card.12. The integrated banking and transaction machine according toclaim 1, further comprising means for consummating the purchasewith a debit card.13. The integrated banking and transaction machine according toclaim I, further comprising means for consurrnnating the purchasewith a stored value card.15. The integrated banking and transaction machine according toclaim 1, further comprising means for consummating the purchasewith an identification card.

    57. Community is using ATMs within this judicial district which incorporate everyelement of the above claims or substantial equivalents thereof. Therefore, Community is directlyor indirectly infringing at least the above claims of the '251 patent, either literally or under thedoctrine of equivalents, and is liable for infringement of the '251 patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C.271.

    58. Community wasmade aware of the '251 patent and Community's infringementthereofby a letter sent to the Bank on about February 15, 2013 addressed to Peter A. Michelotti,President.

    19

    Case 2:33-av-00001 Document 17280 Filed 02/15/13 Page 19 of 40 PageID: 395249

  • 7/28/2019 Automated Transactions v. Community Bank of Bergen County

    20/40

    59. Community also provides the above ATMs for use by customers and others withinthis judicial district, and provides those customers and others with detailed explanations,instructions and information as to arrangements, applications and uses of these ATMs thatpromote and demonstrate how to use these ATMs in an infringing manner. These acts constituteinducement to infringe the above claims of the '251 patent, either literally or under the doctrineof equivalents, whenever a customer uses one of the above ATMs to purchase access to retailATM services through the use of the user interface and wireless network connections.Community is therefore liable for inducing infringement of the '251 patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C.271.

    60. Community's actions in infringing the '251 patent have been, and continue to be,willful, deliberate and/or in conscious disregard to the rights of Automated Transactions, makingthis an exceptional case within the meaning of35 U.S.C. 285.

    61. Community's infringement of the '251 patent has caused and continues to causeirreparable harm to Automated Transactions in an amount to be proven at trial. The infringementof the '251 patent by Community will continue unless enjoined by this Court.

    EIGHTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF

    62. On November 17, 2009, U.S. Patent No. 7,617,973 (the '"973 patent") was dulyand legally issued to David M. Barcelou. A true and correct copy of the '973 patent is attachedhereto as Exhibit H.

    63. By license, Automated Transactions is the exclusive licensee of the '973 patentwith the right to sue for past and future infringement and collect damages therefore in its ownname.

    20

    Case 2:33-av-00001 Document 17280 Filed 02/15/13 Page 20 of 40 PageID: 395250

  • 7/28/2019 Automated Transactions v. Community Bank of Bergen County

    21/40

    64. The '973 patent discloses and claims, among other things, integrated banking andtransaction machines. Claims 1-3, 11-13 and 15 state as follows:

    1. An integrated banking and transaction machine for use by aconsumer to purchase access to retail ATM services, comprising:an automated teller machine;a user interface to the automated teller machine;means for identifying the user to the automated teller machine,further comprising a smart card/magnetic stripe reader/encoder anda sensor;network services to Intranet services connections to the automatedteller machine that use encryption services and security services toprovide the user access to the user interface and retail ATMservice;and access to the automated teller machine user interfacewhereupon the consumer may selectively dispense currency usingthe integrated banking and transaction machine providing the retailATM service;wherein the consumer can purchase access to the retail ATMservice through use of the user interface and Intranet servicesconnections.2. The integrated banking and transaction machine according toclaim I, further comprising means for consnnnnating the purchasewith cash.3. The integrated banking and transaction machine according toclaim 1, further comprising means for consnnnnating the purchasewith bills.11. The integrated banking and transaction machine according toclaim 1, further comprising means for consnnnnating the purchasewith a credit card.12. The integrated banking and transaction machine according toclaim 1, further comprising means for consnnnnating the purchasewith a debit card.

    21

    Case 2:33-av-00001 Document 17280 Filed 02/15/13 Page 21 of 40 PageID: 395251

  • 7/28/2019 Automated Transactions v. Community Bank of Bergen County

    22/40

    13. The integrated banking and transaction machine according toclaim 1, further comprising means for consummating the purchasewith a stored value card.15. The integrated banking and transaction machine according toclaim 1, further comprising means for consummating the purchasewith an identification card.

    65. Community is using ATMs within this judicial district which incorporate everyelement of the above claims or substantial equivalents thereof. Therefore, Community is directlyor indirectly infringing at least the above claims of the '973 patent, either literally or under thedoctrine of equivalents, and is liable for infringement of the '973 patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C.271.

    66. Community was made aware of the '973 patent and Community's infringementthereofby a letter sent to the Bank on about February 15, 2013 addressed to Peter A. Michelotti,President.

    67. Community also provides the above ATMs for use by customers and others withinthis judicial district, and provides those customers and others with detailed explanations,instructions and information as to arrangements, applications and uses of these ATMs thatpromote and demonstrate how to use these ATMs in an infringing manner. These acts constituteinducement to infringe the above claims of the '973 patent, either literally or under the doctrineof equivalents, whenever a customer uses one of the above ATMs to purchase access to retailATM services through the use of network services. Community is therefore liable for inducinginfringement of the '973 patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 271.

    68. Community's actions in infringing the '973 patent have been, and continue to be,willful, deliberate and/or in conscious disregard to the rights ofAutomated Transactions, makingthis an exceptional case within the meaning of35 U.S.C. 285.

    22

    Case 2:33-av-00001 Document 17280 Filed 02/15/13 Page 22 of 40 PageID: 395252

  • 7/28/2019 Automated Transactions v. Community Bank of Bergen County

    23/40

    69. Community's infringement of the '973 patent has caused and continues to causeirreparable harm to Automated Transactions in an amount to be proven at trial. The infringementof the '973 patent by Community will continue unless enjoined by this Court.

    NINTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF

    70. On November 24,2009, U.S. Patent No. 7,621,444 (the '"444 patent") was dulyand legally issued to David M. Barcelou. A true and correct copy of the '444 patent is attachedhereto as Exhibit I.

    71. By license, Automated Transactions is the exclusive licensee of the '444 patentwith the right to sue for past and future infringement and collect damages therefore in its ownname.

    72. The '444 patent discloses and claims, among other things, integrated banking andtransaction machines. Claims 1-3, 11-13 and 15 state as follows:

    1. An integrated banking and transaction machine for use by aconsumer to purchase access to retail ATM services, comprising:an automated teller machine;a user interface to the automated teller machine;and means for identifying the user to the automated teller machine,further comprising a smart card/magnetic stripe reader/encoder anda sensor;network services to banking network connections to the automatedteller machine that use encryption services and security services toprovide the user access to the user interface and retail ATMservice;and access to the automated teller machine user interfacewhereupon the consumer may selectively dispense cash using theintegrated banking and transaction machine providing the retailATM service;

    23

    Case 2:33-av-00001 Document 17280 Filed 02/15/13 Page 23 of 40 PageID: 395253

  • 7/28/2019 Automated Transactions v. Community Bank of Bergen County

    24/40

    wherein the consumer can purchase access to the retail ATMservice through use of the user interface and banking networkconnections.2. The integrated banking and transaction machine according toclaim 1, further comprising means for consummating the purchasewith cash.3. The integrated banking and transaction machine according toclaim 1, further comprising means for consummating the purchasewith bills.11. The integrated banking and transaction machine according toclaim I, further comprising means for consummating the purchasewith a credit card.12. The integrated banking and transaction machine according toclaim 1, further comprising means for consummating the purchasewith a debit card.13. The integrated banking and transaction machine according toclaim 1, further comprising means for consummating the purchasewith a stored value card.15. The integrated banking and transaction machine according toclaim 1, further comprising means for consummating the purchasewith an identification card.

    73. Community is using ATMs within this judicial district which incorporate everyelement of the above claims or substantial equivalents thereof. Therefore, Community is directlyor indirectly infringing at least the above claims of the '444 patent, either literally or under thedoctrine of equivalents, and is liable for infringement of the '444 patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C.271.

    74. Community was made aware of the '444 patent and Community's infringementthereofby a letter sent to the Bank on about February 15, 2013 addressed to Peter A. Michelotti,President.

    24

    Case 2:33-av-00001 Document 17280 Filed 02/15/13 Page 24 of 40 PageID: 395254

  • 7/28/2019 Automated Transactions v. Community Bank of Bergen County

    25/40

    75. Community also provides the above ATMs for use by customers and others withinthis judicial district, and provides those customers and others with detailed explanations,instructions and information as to arrangements, applications and uses of these ATMs thatpromote and demonstrate how to use these ATMs in an infringing manner. These acts constituteinducement to infringe the above claims of the '444 patent, either literally or under the doctrineof equivalents, whenever a customer uses one of the above ATMs to purchase access to retailATM services through the use ofnetwork services. Community is therefore liable for inducinginfringement of the '444 patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 271.

    76. Community's actions in infringing the '444 patent have been, and continue to be,willful, deliberate and/or in conscious disregard to the rights ofAutomated Transactions, makingthis an exceptional case within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. 285.

    77. Community's infringement of the '444 patent has caused and continues to causeirreparable harm to Automated Transactions in an amount to be proven at trial. The infringementof the '444 patent by Community will continue unless enjoined by this Court.

    TENTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF

    78. On September 14,2010, U.S. Patent No. 7,793,830 (the "'830 patent") was dulyand legally issued to David M. Barcelou. A true and correct copy of the '830 patent is attachedhereto as Exhibit J.

    79. By license, Automated Transactions is the exclusive licensee of the '830 patentwith the right to sue for past and future infringement and collect damages therefore in its ownname.

    80. The '830 patent discloses and claims, among other things, integrated banking andtransaction machines. Claims 1-3, 11-13 and 15 state as follows:

    25

    Case 2:33-av-00001 Document 17280 Filed 02/15/13 Page 25 of 40 PageID: 395255

  • 7/28/2019 Automated Transactions v. Community Bank of Bergen County

    26/40

    1. An integrated banking and transaction machine for use by aconsumer to purchase access to retail ATM services, comprising:an automated teller machine;a user interface to the automated teller machine;means for identifYing the user to the automated teller machine,further comprising a smart card/magnetic stripe reader/encoder anda sensor;an Internet interface to the automated teller machine that usesencryption services and security services to provide the user accessto the user interface and retail ATM service;and access to the automated teller machine user interfacewhereupon the consumer may selectively dispense currency usingthe integrated banking and transaction machine providing the retailATM service;wherein the consumer can purchase access to the retail ATMservice through use of the user interface and the Internet interface.2. The integrated banking and transaction machine according toclaim 1, further comprising means for consummating the purchasewith cash.3. The integrated banking and transaction machine according toclaim 1, further comprising means for consummating the purchasewith bills.11. The integrated banking and transaction machine according toclaim 1, further comprising means for consummating the purchasewith a credit card.12. The integrated banking and transaction machine according toclaim I, further comprising means for consummating the purchasewith a debit card.13. The integrated banking and transaction machine according toclaim I, further comprising means for consummating the purchasewith a stored value card.15. The integrated banking and transaction machine according toclaim 1, further comprisingmeans for consummating the purchasewith an identification card.

    26

    Case 2:33-av-00001 Document 17280 Filed 02/15/13 Page 26 of 40 PageID: 395256

  • 7/28/2019 Automated Transactions v. Community Bank of Bergen County

    27/40

    81. Community is using ATMs within this judicial district which incorporate everyelement of the above claims or substantial equivalents thereof Therefore, Community is directlyor indirectly infringing at least the above claims of the '830 patent, either literally or under thedoctrine of equivalents, and is liable for infringement of the '830 patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C.271.

    82. Community was made aware of the '830 patent and Community's infringementthereofby a letter sent to the Bank on about February 15,2013 addressed to Peter A. Michelotti,President.

    83. Community also provides the above ATMs for use by customers and others withinthis judicial district, and provides those customers and others with detailed explanations,instructions and information as to arrangements, applications and uses of these ATMs thatpromote and demonstrate how to use these ATMs in an infringing manner. These acts constituteinducement to infringe the above claims of the '830 patent, either literally or under the doctrineof equivalents, whenever a customer uses one of the above ATMs to purchase access to retailATM services through the use of the user interface and Internet service connections. Communityis therefore liable for inducing infringement of the '830 patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 271.

    84. Community's actions in infringing the '830 patent have been, and continue to be,willful, deliberate and/or in conscious disregard to the rights ofAutomated Transactions, makingthis an exceptional case within the meaning of35 U.S.C. 285.

    85. Community's infringement of the '830 patent has caused and continues to causeirreparable harm to Automated Transactions in an amount to be proven at trial. The infringementof the '830 patent by Community will continue unless enjoined by this Court.

    27

    Case 2:33-av-00001 Document 17280 Filed 02/15/13 Page 27 of 40 PageID: 395257

  • 7/28/2019 Automated Transactions v. Community Bank of Bergen County

    28/40

    ELEVENTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF

    86. On September 28,2010, U.S. Patent No. 7,802,718 (the '"718 patent") was dulyand legally issued to David M. Barcelou. A true and correct copy of the '718 patent is attachedhereto as Exhibit K.

    87. By license, Automated Transactions is the exclusive licensee of the '718 patentwith the right to sue for past and future infringement and collect damages therefore in its ownname.

    88. The '718 patent discloses and claims, among other things, integrated banking andtransaction machines. Claims 1-3, 11-13 and 15 state as follows:

    1. An integrated banking and transaction machine for use by aconsumer to purchase access to retail automated teller machineservices, comprising: an automated teller machine;a user interface to the automated teller machine;an identification device for identifying the user to the automatedteller machine, further comprising a smart card/magnetic stripereader/encoder and a sensor; an Internet interface to an Intranet connection to the automatedteller machine that uses encryption services and security services toprovide the user access to the user interface and retail automatedteller machine service;and access to the automated teller machine user interfacewhereupon the consumer may selectively dispense bills and/orcoins using the integrated banking and transaction machineproviding the retail automated teller machine service;wherein the consumer can purchase access to the retail automatedteller machine service through use of the user interface, Intranetand Internet connections.2. The integrated banking and transaction machine according toclaim 1, further comprising means for consummating the purchasewith cash.

    28

    Case 2:33-av-00001 Document 17280 Filed 02/15/13 Page 28 of 40 PageID: 395258

  • 7/28/2019 Automated Transactions v. Community Bank of Bergen County

    29/40

    3. The integrated banking and transaction machine according toclaim 1, further comprising means for consummating the purchasewith bills.

    11. The integrated banking and transaction machine according toclaim 1, further comprising means for consummating the purchasewith a credit card.12. The integrated banking and transaction machine according toclaim 1, further comprising means for consummating the purchasewith a debit card.13. The integrated banking and transaction machine according toclaim 1, further comprising means for consummating the purchasewith a stored value card.15. The integrated banking and transaction machine according toclaim 1, further comprising means for consummating the purchasewith an identification card.

    89. Community is using ATMs within this judicial district which incorporate everyelement ofthe above claims or substantial equivalents thereof. Therefore, Community is directlyor indirectly infringing at least the above claims of the '718 patent, either literally or under thedoctrine of equivalents, and is liable for infringement of the '718 patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C.271.

    90. Community was made aware of the '718 patent and Community 's infringementthereofby a letter sent to the Bank on about February 15, 2013 addressed to Peter A. Michelotti,President.

    91. Community also provides the above ATMs for use by customers and others withinthis judicial district, and provides those customers and others with detailed explanations,instructions and information as to arrangements, applications and. uses of these ATMs thatpromote and demonstrate how to use these ATMs in an infringing manner. These acts constitute

    29

    Case 2:33-av-00001 Document 17280 Filed 02/15/13 Page 29 of 40 PageID: 395259

  • 7/28/2019 Automated Transactions v. Community Bank of Bergen County

    30/40

    inducement to infringe the above claims of the '718 patent, either literally or under the doctrineof equivalents, whenever a customer uses one of the above ATMs to purchase access to retailATM services through the use of the user interface, Intranet and Internet service connections.Community is therefore liable for inducing infringement of the '718 patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C.271.

    92. Community's actions in infringing the '718 patent have been, and continue to be,willful, deliberate and/or in conscious disregard to the rights ofAutomated Transactions, makingthis an exceptional case within the meaning of35 U.S.C. 285.

    93. Community's infringement of the '718 patent has caused and continues to causeirreparable harm to Automated Transactions in an amount to be proven at trial. The infringementof the '718 patent by Community will continue unless enjoined by this Court.

    TWELTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF

    94. On November 23, 2010, U.S. Patent No. 7,837,101 (the "'101 patent") was dulyand legally issued to David M. Barcelou. A true and correct copy of the '101 patent is attachedhereto as Exhibit L.

    95. By license, Automated Transactions is the exclusive licensee of the '101 patentwith the right to sue for past and future infringement and collect damages therefore in its ownname.

    96. The '101 patent discloses and claims, among other things, integrated banking andtransaction machines. Claims 1-3, 11-13 and 15 state as follows:

    1. An integrated banking and transaction machine for use by aconsumer to purchase access to retail automated teller machineservices, comprising: an automated teller machine;a user interface to the automated teller machine;

    30

    Case 2:33-av-00001 Document 17280 Filed 02/15/13 Page 30 of 40 PageID: 395260

  • 7/28/2019 Automated Transactions v. Community Bank of Bergen County

    31/40

    means for identifYing the user to the automated teller machine,further comprising a smart card/magnetic stripe reader/encoder anda sensor;network services to satellite network connections to the automatedteller machine that use encryption services and security services toprovide the user access to the user interface and retail ATMservice;and access to the automated teller machine user interfacewhereupon the consumer may selectively dispense cash using theintegrated banking and transaction machine providing the retailATM service;wherein the consumer can purchase access to the retail automatedteller machine service through use of the user interface and satellitenetwork connections.2. The integrated banking and transaction machine according toclaim I, further comprising means for consururnating the purchasewith cash.3. The integrated banking and transaction machine according toclaini 1, further comprising means for consururnating the purchasewith bills.11. The integrated banking and transaction machine according toclaim 1, further comprising means for consummating the purchasewith a credit card.12. The integrated banking and transaction machine according toclaini 1, further comprising means for consummating the purchasewith a debit card.13. The integrated banking and transaction machine according toclaim 1, further comprising means for consururnating the purchasewith a stored value card.15. The integrated banking and transaction machine according toclaim 1, further comprising means for consummating the purchasewith an identification card.

    97. Community is using ATMs within this judicial district which incorporate everyelement of the above claims or substantial equivalents thereof. Therefore, Community is directly

    31

    Case 2:33-av-00001 Document 17280 Filed 02/15/13 Page 31 of 40 PageID: 395261

  • 7/28/2019 Automated Transactions v. Community Bank of Bergen County

    32/40

    or indirectly infringing at least the above claims of the '1 01 patent, either literally or under thedoctrine of equivalents, and is liable for infringement of the '101 patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C.271.

    98. Community was made aware of the '101 patent and Community's infringementthereofby a letter sent to the Bank on about February 15,2013 addressed to Peter A. Michelotti,President.

    99. Community also provides the above ATMs for use by customers and others withinthis judicial district, and provides those customers and others with detailed explanations,instructions and information as to arrangements, applications and uses of these ATMs thatpromote and demonstrate how to use these ATMs in an infringing manner. These acts constituteinducement to infringe the above claims of the '101 patent, either literally or under the doctrineof equivalents, whenever a customer uses one of the above ATMs to purchase access to retailATM services through the use of network services. Community is therefore liable for inducinginfringement of the '101 patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 271.

    100. Community's actions in infringing the '1 01 patent have been, and continue to be,willful, deliberate and/or in conscious disregard to the rights ofAutomated Transactions, makingthis an exceptional case within the meaning of35 U.S.C. 285.

    101. Community's infringement of the '1 01 patent has caused and continues to causeirreparable harm to Automated Transactions in an amount to be proven at trial. The infringementof the '101 patent by Community will continue unless enjoined by this Court.

    32

    Case 2:33-av-00001 Document 17280 Filed 02/15/13 Page 32 of 40 PageID: 395262

  • 7/28/2019 Automated Transactions v. Community Bank of Bergen County

    33/40

    PRAYER FOR RELIEFWHEREFORE, Automated Transactions prays for judgment against Community asfollows:

    1) Declaring Community has infringed United States Patent No. 7,575,158;

    2) Permanently enjoining Community, its officers, directors, agents, subsidiaries andemployees, and those in privity or in active concert with tern, from furtheractivities that constitute infringement, contributory infringement and/or inducinginfringement of United States Patent No. 7,575, 158;

    3) Awarding lost profits or a reasonable royalty and other damages arising fromCommunity's infringement of United States Patent No. 7,575,158 including trebledamages, to Automated Transactions, together with prejudgment and post-judgment interest, in an amount according to proof;

    4) This case be declared an "exceptional case" within the meaning of35 U.S.C. 285and awarding treble damages and reasonable attorneys' fees to AutomatedTransactions;

    5) Declaring Community has infringed United States Patent No. 7,597,248;

    6) Permanently enjoining Community, its officers, directors, agents, subsidiaries andemployees, and those in privity or in active concert with them, from furtheractivities that constitute infringement, contributory infringement and/or inducinginfringement of United States Patent No. 7,597,248.

    7) Awarding lost profits or a reasonable royalty and other damages arising fromCommunity's infringement of United States Patent No. 7,597,248 including treble

    33

    Case 2:33-av-00001 Document 17280 Filed 02/15/13 Page 33 of 40 PageID: 395263

  • 7/28/2019 Automated Transactions v. Community Bank of Bergen County

    34/40

    damages, to Automated Transactions, together with prejudgment and post-judgment interest, in an amount according to proof;

    8) This case be declared an "exceptional case" within the meaning of35 U.S.C. 285and awarding treble damages and reasonable attorneys' fees to AutomatedTransactions;

    9) Declaring Community has infringed United States Patent No. 7,600,677;

    10) Permanently enjoining Community, its officers, directors, agents, subsidiaries and

    employees, and those in privity or in active concert with them, from furtheractivities that constitute infringement, contributory infringement and/or inducinginfringement of United States Patent No. 7,600,677.

    11) Awarding lost profits or a reasonable royalty and other damages arising fromCommunity's infringement of United States Patent No. 7,600,677 including trebledamages, to Automated Transactions, together with prejudgment and post-judgment interest, in an amount according to proof;

    12) This case be declared an "exceptional case" within the meaning of35 U.S.C. 285and awarding treble damages and reasonable attorneys' fees to AutomatedTransactions;

    13)Declaring Community has infringed United States Patent No. 7,699,220;

    14) Permanently enjoining Community, its officers, directors, agents, subsidiaries andemployees, and those in privity or in active concert with them, from furtheractivities that constitute infringement, contributory infringement and/or inducing

    34

    Case 2:33-av-00001 Document 17280 Filed 02/15/13 Page 34 of 40 PageID: 395264

  • 7/28/2019 Automated Transactions v. Community Bank of Bergen County

    35/40

    infringement of United States Patent No. 7,699,220.

    15) Awarding lost profits or a reasonable royalty and other damages arising fromCommunity's infringement of United States Patent No. 7,699,220 including trebledamages, to Automated Transactions, together with prejudgment and post-judgment interest; in an amount according to proof;

    16) This case be declared an "exceptional case" within the meaning of35 U.S.C. 285and awarding treble damages and reasonable attorneys' fees to AutomatedTransactions.

    17)Declaring Community has infringed United States Patent No. 7,571,850;

    18) Permanently enjoining Community, its officers, directors, agents, subsidiaries andemployees, and those in privity or in active concert with them, from furtheractivities that constitute infringement, contributory infringement and/or inducinginfringement of United States Patent No. 7,571,850.

    19) Awarding lost profits or a reasonable royalty and other damages arising fromCommunity's infringement of United States Patent No. 7,571,850 including trebledamages, to Automated Transactions, together with prejudgment and post-judgment interest, in an amount according to proof;

    20) This case be declared an "exceptional case" within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. 285and awarding treble damages and reasonable attorneys' fees to AutomatedTransactions.

    21)Declaring Community has infringed United States Patent No. 7,591,420;

    35

    Case 2:33-av-00001 Document 17280 Filed 02/15/13 Page 35 of 40 PageID: 395265

  • 7/28/2019 Automated Transactions v. Community Bank of Bergen County

    36/40

    22) Permanently enjoining Community, its officers, directors, agents, subsidiaries andemployees, and those in privity or in active concert with them, from furtheractivities that constitute infringement, contributory infringement and/or inducinginfringement ofUnited States Patent No. 7,591,420.

    23) Awarding lost profits or a reasonable royalty and other damages arising fromCommunity's infringement of United States Patent No. 7,591,420 including trebledamages, to Automated Transactions, together with prejudgment and post-judgment interest, in an amount according to proof;

    24) This case be declared an "exceptional case" within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. 285and awarding treble damages and reasonable attorneys' fees to AutomatedTransactions.

    25)Declaring Community has infringed United States Patent No. 7,597,251;

    26) Permanently enjoining Community, its officers, directors, agents, subsidiaries andemployees, and those in privity or in active concert with them, from furtheractivities that constitute infringement, contributory infringement and/or inducinginfringement ofUnited States Patent No. 7,597,251.

    27) Awarding lost profits or a reasonable royalty and other damages arising fromCommunity's infringement ofUnited States Patent No. 7,597,251 including trebledamages, to Automated Transactions, together with prejudgment and post-judgment interest, in an amount according to proof;

    28)This case be declared an "exceptional case" within the meaning of35 U.S.C. 285and awarding treble damages and reasonable attorneys' fees to Automated

    36

    Case 2:33-av-00001 Document 17280 Filed 02/15/13 Page 36 of 40 PageID: 395266

  • 7/28/2019 Automated Transactions v. Community Bank of Bergen County

    37/40

    Transactions.

    29)Declaring Community has infringed United States Patent No. 7,617,973;

    30) Permanently enjoining Community, its officers, directors, agents, subsidiaries andemployees, and those in privity or in active concert with them, from furtheractivities that constitute infringement, contributory infringement and/or inducinginfringement of United States Patent No. 7,617,973.

    31) Awarding lost profits or a reasonable royalty and other damages arising fromCommunity's infringement of United States Patent No. 7,617,973 including trebledamages, to Automated Transactions, together with prejudgment and postjudgment interest, in an amount according to proof;

    32) This case be declared an "exceptional case" within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. 285and awarding treble damages and reasonable attorneys' fees to AutomatedTransactions.

    33)Declaring Community has infringed United States Patent No. 7,621,444;

    34) Permanently enjoining Community, its officers, directors, agents, subsidiaries andemployees, and those in privity or in active concert with them, from furtheractivities that constitute infringement, contributory infringement and/or inducinginfringement of United States Patent No. 7,621,444.

    35) Awarding lost profits or a reasonable royalty and other damages arising fromCommunity's infringement of United States Patent No. 7,621,444 including trebledamages, to Automated Transactions, together with prejudgment and post-

    37

    Case 2:33-av-00001 Document 17280 Filed 02/15/13 Page 37 of 40 PageID: 395267

  • 7/28/2019 Automated Transactions v. Community Bank of Bergen County

    38/40

    judgment interest, in an amount according to proof;

    36) This case be declared an "exceptional case" within the meaning of35 U.S.C. 285and awarding treble damages and reasonable attorneys' fees to AutomatedTransactions.

    37)Declaring Community has infringed United States Patent No. 7,793,830;

    38) Permanently enjoining Community, its officers, directors, agents, subsidiaries andemployees, and those in privity or in active concert with them, from furtheractivities that constitute infringement, contributory infringement and/or inducinginfringement of United States Patent No. 7,793,830.

    39) Awarding lost profits or a reasonable royalty and other damages arising fromCommunity's infringement of United States Patent No. 7,793,830 including trebledamages, to Automated Transactions, together with prejudgment and post-judgment interest, in an amount according to proof;

    40) This case be declared an "exceptional case" within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. 285and awarding treble damages and reasonable attorneys' fees to AutomatedTransactions.

    41)Declaring Community has infringed United States Patent No. 7,802,718;

    42) Permanently enjoining Community, its officers, directors, agents, subsidiaries andemployees, and those in privity or in active concert with them, from furtheractivities that constitute infringement, contributory infringement and/or inducinginfringement of United States Patent No. 7,802,718.

    38

    Case 2:33-av-00001 Document 17280 Filed 02/15/13 Page 38 of 40 PageID: 395268

  • 7/28/2019 Automated Transactions v. Community Bank of Bergen County

    39/40

    43) Awarding lost profits or a reasonable royalty and other damages arising fromCommunity's infringement ofUnited States Patent No. 7,802,718 including trebledamages, to Automated Transactions, together with prejudgment and post-judgment interest, in an amount according to proof;

    44) This case be declared an "exceptional case" within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. 285and awarding treble damages and reasonable attorneys' fees to AutomatedTransactions.

    45)Declaring Community has infringed United States Patent No. 7,837,10 I;

    46) Permanently enjoining Community, its officers, directors, agents, subsidiaries andemployees, and those in privity or in active concert with them, from furtheractivities that constitute infringement, contributory infringement and/or inducinginfringement ofUnited States Patent No. 7,837, 101.

    47) Awarding lost profits or a reasonable royalty and other damages arising fromCommunity's infr ingement ofUnited States Patent No. 7,837,101 includingtreble damages, to Automated Transactions, together with prejudgment andpost-judgment interest, in an amount according to proof;

    48) This case be declared an "exceptional case" within the meaning of35 U.S.C. 285and awarding treble damages and reasonable attorneys' fees to AutomatedTransactions.

    49) Awarding Automated Transactions suchother and further relief as the Courtdeems just and proper.

    39

    Case 2:33-av-00001 Document 17280 Filed 02/15/13 Page 39 of 40 PageID: 395269

  • 7/28/2019 Automated Transactions v. Community Bank of Bergen County

    40/40

    DEMAND FOR JURY TRIALPlaintiff requests a trial by jury of all issues.

    Dated: February 15, 2013

    Respectfully submitted,AUTOMATED TRANSACTIONS LLCBy its attorneys,

    By: s/ Daniel A. SuckermanDaniel A. SuckermanTannenbaum HelpemSyracuse & Hirschtritt LLP900 Third A venueNew York, New York 10022(212) 508-6700Of Counsel:Albert L. Jacobs, Jr.Gerard F. DiebnerJohn Murray

    Case 2:33-av-00001 Document 17280 Filed 02/15/13 Page 40 of 40 PageID: 395270