Automated Traffic Enforcement (ATE) on the Primary Highway System

11
Automated Traffic Enforcement (ATE) on the Primary Highway System

description

Automated Traffic Enforcement (ATE) on the Primary Highway System. ATEs in Iowa. Davenport …………….RLR & Speed Cedar Rapids…………RLR & Speed Des Moines…………… RLR & Speed Sioux City……………..RLR & Speed Muscatine……………...RLR & Speed Council Bluffs………….RLR Clive…………………...RLR - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Automated Traffic Enforcement (ATE) on the Primary Highway System

Page 1: Automated Traffic Enforcement (ATE) on the Primary Highway System

Automated Traffic Enforcement (ATE) on the Primary Highway System

Page 2: Automated Traffic Enforcement (ATE) on the Primary Highway System

ATEs in Iowa• Davenport…………….RLR & Speed• Cedar Rapids………… RLR & Speed• Des Moines…………… RLR & Speed• Sioux City…………….. RLR & Speed• Muscatine……………...RLR & Speed• Council Bluffs…………. RLR• Clive…………………...RLR • Ft. Dodge……………...Speed• Windsor Heights………Speed• Polk County……………Speed

Page 3: Automated Traffic Enforcement (ATE) on the Primary Highway System

Why is DOT Involved?• Iowa Code 307.2 • DOT responsible for planning, development, regulation and

improvement of transportation in the state.

• Iowa is the only state:• Local Jurisdiction can get ATEs by simple majority vote• Permanent speed cameras on the interstate

• ATEs can be Effective if Used in the Right Places• But…Research is mixed

• Public Trust

• Expensive from a Societal Perspective

Page 4: Automated Traffic Enforcement (ATE) on the Primary Highway System
Page 5: Automated Traffic Enforcement (ATE) on the Primary Highway System

History

• DOT Published ATE Guidelines - June 2012• Met with and Gathered Input from Cities - Sept 2012

• Published in Iowa Administrative Bulletin - Oct 2013• Rules Committee @ Capital - Oct 2013• Public Hearing & Written Comments - Oct/Nov

2013• Iowa DOT Commission – Approved - Dec 2013• Rules Committee @ Capital - Feb 2014• Adopted - Feb 2014

Page 6: Automated Traffic Enforcement (ATE) on the Primary Highway System

General Principals1. Primary Highway System only2. Only considered after other engineering and

enforcement solutions have been explored and implemented

3. Should not be used as a long term solution4. Fixed and mobile systems5. Limited use on the interstates6. Only used in high-crash, high-risk or school zones7. DOT Provide Objective Oversight

DOT – no authority to own/operate any ATE systems DOT – shall not receive any $

Page 7: Automated Traffic Enforcement (ATE) on the Primary Highway System

Justification Report(new installations only)

• Conduct an Engineering Safety Assessment

• Determine Critical Traffic Safety Issue(s)• Develop list of Countermeasures• Implement some Countermeasures

• Low cost, least intrusive/controversial• Why ATE is needed

Page 8: Automated Traffic Enforcement (ATE) on the Primary Highway System
Page 9: Automated Traffic Enforcement (ATE) on the Primary Highway System

Minimum Requirements• Signage• Calibration• Safe Environment for Motorists

• Do not impede or interfere with free flow traffic• Do not create visual obstruction• Not placed within 15 ft. of an interstate (unless

shielded)• Not within 2 ft. of back of curb• Not placed in a work zone• Not placed close to a speed zone change

• Traditional Enforcement – continue

Page 10: Automated Traffic Enforcement (ATE) on the Primary Highway System

Annual Report• Crashes – Before and After• Impact of ATE on Speeds or Red-Light Running• Number of Citations• Anything else to show they are effective• Provide by May 1 of following year

DOT Review of Annual ReportDOT will evaluate Annual Report to determine continued need, modification, etc. for ATE system

• Are the systems effective?• Are they in compliance with these

rules?• Consider other safety

countermeasures?

Page 11: Automated Traffic Enforcement (ATE) on the Primary Highway System