8/12/2019 Author Note to Brief to the Court of Appeals Second Circuit

1/2

AUTHOR NOTEThis Brief could not be submitted (and was not submitted) to the Federal Court of A eals !econdCircuit because of a fraudulent (fraud on the court) sua s onte order of the followin" ultra leftist!o#iet$!talinist % &ud"e anel of the Court of A eals' Chester & !traub Robert * !ac+ and Ra,mond- .ohier -r that dismissed the /laintiff A ellant0s A eal rior the o ortunit, of submittin" theBrief to the Court The Order of aforementioned &ud"es is a clear dis la, of rac+eteerin" acti#it, of

federal &ud"es as associates in the Enter rise headed b, former Attorne, 1eneral of New 2or+ !tateAndrew Cuomo resentl, "o#ernor of New 2or+ !tate runnin" for re$election as "o#ernor in No#ember 3456 with ambition and su ort of 7ar8ist$.eninist olitical "rou s mas9ueradin" asliberal and ro"ressi#e The Order of the aforementioned % &ud"es of the federal Court of A eals isirrational illo"ical and lac+in" sense of an, lucid erson who otherwise would be dia"nosed b, an,

s,chiatrist as sufferin" of aranoid schi:o hrenia The Order inter alia states' ;U on dueconsideration it is hereb, OR*ERE* that the a eal is *ismissed because it lac+s an ar"uable basis inlaw or fact; (ca itali:ation b, the Court) The enclosed Brief of a ellant 7ircea

8/12/2019 Author Note to Brief to the Court of Appeals Second Circuit

2/2

dis ute instead of R@CO rac+eteerin" Another fraud on the court committed b, the cler+ of Court ofA eals was listin" as a defendant A rilanne A"ostino Cler+ of the !u reme Court of N2 A ellate*i#ision !econd *e artment as a &ustice of the !u reme Court !uch fraud is ob#ious as the cler+ ofcourt is not a &ustice of the !u reme Court of N2 (who has absolute immunit,) in contrast to the cler+of the court who lac+s e#en the 9ualified immunit, when erformin" the mandator, ministerialfunction as in this case Another fraud on the court brou"ht to li"ht b, the A ellant0 s motion to the

Court of A eals was the decei#in" and false listin" of -anet ! iridona+os sole com lainant as adefendant in this le"al case Nonetheless ! iridona+os was ne#er named as a defendant in this le"alcase under a eal ne#er ser#ed with the summons or wai#er rather she was sued for breach of contractand fraud in a different le"al case in the *istrict Court @n a cons irac, of rac+eteerin" acts the cler+ ofthe *istrict Court Rub, ra&ic+ listed ! iridona+os in the *istrict Court case under a eal as a;"host; defendant when she was sued This was not an innocent error of the cler+ of court ratherdeliberate inclusion of criminal rac+eteerin" associate ! iridona+os in a case where she is not adefendant onl, with the fraudulent intention that b, her listin" as bein" a defendant the OA1 ( le"alteam to defend the Enter rise headed b, former A1 Andrew Cuomo) would defend her for free (le"ale8 enses are rohibiti#e) Nonetheless the counsel of former A1 of N2 Cuomo in an act ofim ressin" honest, refused to defend ! iridona+os and the Cor oration (Freeboard @nternational @ncowned b, her husband funds she used for ri#ate urchases) for the ob#ious reason that she was notsued in this le"al case Finall, the Court of A eals listed ! iridona+os0 cor oration as a defendanthowe#er Freeboard @nternational @nc failed to a ear b, counsel and subse9uentl, defaulted des itean e8tension b, the Court of A eals in addition to the e8tension "ranted b, the corru t &ud"e of the*istrict Court Nelson ! Roman who b, fraud on the court dismissed the case a"ainst ! iridona+osdes ite that ! iridona+os as a defendant defaulted as a matter of fact and a matter of law b, failure tosubmit an answer to the Com laint or a motion The corru t &ustice in the N2 !tate !u reme Court of

New 2or+ and the federal *istrict Court as well as the Court of A eals ma+e a moc+er, of &ustice ofthe &ustice in U! of America The federal district court in New 2or+ features in the fo,er of itsim ressin" buildin" a "iant statue of -ustice holdin" the balance @t would be more a ro riate to ha#ea statue of Fuehrer Adolf Hitler sha+in" the hands of -ose h !talin as true e8 onents of the &ustice inU! of America The "rounds on which such e"re"ious and criminal acts were erformed in differenttribunals in a su osedl, democratic countr, is the fact that there is a olitical basis Andrew Cuomo isrunnin" for re$election as "o#ernor of N2 !tate with ers ecti#e to be nominated b, the *emocrat/art, to be the ne8t resident of U! of America Ob#iousl, all &ud"es in#ol#ed in the federal courtwere nominated for life b, *emocrat /residents and ha#e all the interest not to discredit a member oftheir art, This le"al case will remain fore#er as a s,mbol of o ression re ression of ci#il and humanri"hts in the U! of America that is re resented in the whole world as a s,mbol of democrac,

reser#ation of constitutional ri"hts of its citi:ens and bastion of freedom democrac, and libert,>hile Con"ress enacted the federal law 5= U!C !ec 5= to combat the rac+eteerin" the federal law 5=U!C !ec 5= c !tate Attorne, 1eneral was enacted s ecificall, to eradicate rac+eteerin" in the court of

&ustice and limit the ower of the state Attorne, 1eneral Nonetheless it is hi"hl, a arent that theE8ecuti#e branch and -udiciar, branch are com letel, i"norin" the laws enacted b, the electedre resentati#es of American eo le The unlimited ower of the court of &ustice i"norin" the laws ofthis countr, is de facto re resentation of !o#ietG!talinist or fascist o ression and re ression ofAmerican citi:ens After all said !o#iet Union Eastern Euro ean countries behind the @ron Curtain aswell as North orea Cuba and theocratic re ressi#e re"imes had and ha#e also a Constitution andlaws in their countries that con#enientl, i"nore1od bless America1od sa#e America