Author-centric thinking - Innovating the experience for scholarly authors

17
Innovating the authorship experience Benjamin Shaw | Director, Global & China

Transcript of Author-centric thinking - Innovating the experience for scholarly authors

Page 1: Author-centric thinking - Innovating the experience for scholarly authors

Innovating the authorship experience

Benjamin Shaw | Director, Global & China

Page 2: Author-centric thinking - Innovating the experience for scholarly authors

PreparationJournal

SelectionWriting Submission

PeerReview

Publication Success

determining likelihood of acceptance

citation management

navigating a submission system in a

second language

writing an outline

comparing journals

assessing relevance to

research topic

understanding comments

long decision timelines

decision to re-submit, or try a different journal

Publicationethics

writing in English formatting to

guidelines

Author challenges on the path to publication success

Page 3: Author-centric thinking - Innovating the experience for scholarly authors

Author-centric thinking

Aims & Scope

Instructions for Authors

Peer review

Submission systems

Language screening & guidelines

Decision timelines

Author

Page 4: Author-centric thinking - Innovating the experience for scholarly authors

Brainstorm Ideas

The dozens or hundreds of A&S in a given field all seem the same

A&S are static Flat text is boring and lacks

nuance

Make a video Aims & Scope Update quarterly, or even after

every issue Clearly state information authors

care about, such as timelines to decision

Problems

Re-think the Aims & Scope

The traditional Aims & Scope is broken:

Solutions

Page 5: Author-centric thinking - Innovating the experience for scholarly authors

Brainstorm Ideas Re-think Instructions for Authors

Instructions are long and onerous

Authors are experts in their field of research, not in formatting in MS Word

Simplify guidelines

Translate into key languages

Problems Solutions

Page 6: Author-centric thinking - Innovating the experience for scholarly authors

Brainstorm Ideas Improve the value of peer review

Long decision times

Unclear comments

Lack of bottom-line

decisions or guidance

from journal editors

Encourage pre-submission

inquiries

Re-invent how peer review

comments are structured

Clearly advise if authors should

submit to a different journal

Problems Solutions

Authors complain about:

Page 7: Author-centric thinking - Innovating the experience for scholarly authors

Brainstorm Ideas Be helpful

Authors are unclear about

policies

Journals reject for language

problems without giving

suggestions on how to solve

them

Authors are unsure what it

takes to get published

Set up an author helpdesk

Refer authors to a list of vetted

language services

Show the anatomy of an

exemplar paper: supporting

evidence required; how

novelty is determined

Problems Solutions

Page 8: Author-centric thinking - Innovating the experience for scholarly authors

Brainstorm Ideas Reach out to authors

Authors from non-traditional

markets face unique challenges

Authors in China and elsewhere

are already talking about your

brand in their own language

Travel to the countries that your

papers come from

Make someone from management

responsible for author experience

Communicate with scientists online in

their own language

Problems Solutions

Page 9: Author-centric thinking - Innovating the experience for scholarly authors

Brainstorm Ideas

Support development of a positive scientific culture

Weak culture of scientific

communication

Inexperience with peer

review

English is a second

language for most authors

Provide educational materials

Make a ‘Journal Club’ kit to encourage

young scientists to read more

Encourage authors from emerging

markets to serve as peer reviewers

Problems Solutions

Page 10: Author-centric thinking - Innovating the experience for scholarly authors

Innovation Case Study:Journal Selector Difficulties during manuscript

preparation

Page 11: Author-centric thinking - Innovating the experience for scholarly authors

Innovation Case Study:Journal Selector Methods used to identify

potential journals

42%

18%

32%

8% Review references

Ask a colleague

Search publisher websites

Other

Page 12: Author-centric thinking - Innovating the experience for scholarly authors

Innovation Case Study:Journal Selector There’s a better way

Research The literature

Match

.

• Frequency: Monthly, with online first• Topics: theoretical and computational methods,

solid and structural mechanics, multi-body system dynamics, constitutive modeling, inelastic and finite deformation response

• IF = 1.831

Match the ‘fingerprint’ of an author’s paper to journal fingerprints

Account for author criteria, e.g., publishing frequency and IF

Page 13: Author-centric thinking - Innovating the experience for scholarly authors

1. Insert English sample textauthor’s abstract, short description, key phrases, or abstract from similar paper

How to use it

Page 14: Author-centric thinking - Innovating the experience for scholarly authors

2. Filter and refine

publication frequency

Impact Factor

revise sample text to refine results

Page 15: Author-centric thinking - Innovating the experience for scholarly authors

3. Narrow the options

match analysis

basic journal information

similar articles published by this journal

Page 16: Author-centric thinking - Innovating the experience for scholarly authors

4. Visit journal websites to make a final decision

Page 17: Author-centric thinking - Innovating the experience for scholarly authors

Follow us on Twitter

@JournalAdvisor@STMChina

Contact me

[email protected]

Downloads and further reading

www.edanzediting.com/STM-China