Australian Transport Council - Australian Maritime Safety ...
Australian Council for Educational Research Test for Schools Technical... · 3 Foreword This...
Transcript of Australian Council for Educational Research Test for Schools Technical... · 3 Foreword This...
June 2012
PISA-Based Test for Schools
Technical report
Submitted to: Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and
Development (OECD)
Australian Council for Educational Research
Private Bag 55
Camberwell Vic 3124
Phone +61 3 9277 5555
Direct +61 3 9277 5511
ACN: 004 398 145; ABN: 19 004 398 145
3
Foreword
This report, produced by the Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER), describes
the procedures used for the development of assessment instruments for the PISA-Based Test for
Schools, a project of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
In the report there are descriptions of the item development process, including how some items
are subsequently deleted, how items are modified before inclusion in trial testing and the results
of that testing; detailed descriptions of the resulting item characteristics are given. The report
describes how the analysis from trial testing and other information such as framework coverage
were considered to produce the pilot trial assessment for the project, which is being undertaken
in a number of countries in May-June 2012.
While the report describes the specific details of this project, the principles underlying its
implementation are similar to the approach used by ACER generally in its test development.
The report was produced under the guidance of the co-directors of the project, Juliette
Mendelovits and John Cresswell, with substantial contributions from Alla Berezner, Greg
Macaskill and Stephanie Templeton.
4
Table of Contents
Foreword .................................................................................................................................. 3
Chapter 1: Introduction ............................................................................................................. 6
PISA ................................................................................................................................................. 6 PISA-Based Test for Schools .............................................................................................................. 6 Phase 1 .............................................................................................................................................. 7 Phase 2 .............................................................................................................................................. 7 Organisation of this report ............................................................................................................... 7
Chapter 2: Test design and test development ............................................................................. 9
Test Design ........................................................................................................................................ 9 Test Development........................................................................................................................... 11 Field trial and equating study instrument characteristics .............................................................. 15
Chapter 3: Field Operations for the field trial and equating studies ........................................... 22
Recruitment of countries and locales for the field trial and equating studies ............................... 22 Field trial operations in participating countries and groups .......................................................... 23 Coding ............................................................................................................................................. 26
Chapter 4: Preparation of Instruments for the Pilot Trial of the PISA-Based Test for Schools ...... 30
Test Design for the Pilot Trial ......................................................................................................... 30 Selection of Items for the Pilot Trial Cognitive Instruments ........................................................... 31 Blueprints and actual distribution of items and score points by key PISA framework variables ... 31 National adaptation process for the pilot trial ............................................................................... 36 Pilot trial cognitive instrument construction .................................................................................. 36 Pilot trial questionnaire construction ............................................................................................. 37 Preparation of Manuals .................................................................................................................. 40
Chapter 5: Equating Methods and Results ................................................................................ 42
Differential Item Functioning by Gender ........................................................................................ 46 Item-by-country Interaction (Country DIF) ..................................................................................... 51 Test Targeting ................................................................................................................................. 52
Chapter 6: Proposal for replenishment of items ........................................................................ 60
Appendix 1: Audit of items developed for the Phase 1 and Phase 2 FT-ES .................................. 64
Mathematics ................................................................................................................................... 64 Reading ........................................................................................................................................... 74 Science ............................................................................................................................................ 91
Appendix 2: PBT Critical friends.............................................................................................. 110
Appendix 3: Item Characteristics ............................................................................................ 111
Mathematics ................................................................................................................................. 111 Reading ......................................................................................................................................... 125 Science .......................................................................................................................................... 140
Appendix 4: ICC gender performance ..................................................................................... 159
Mathematics ................................................................................................................................. 159 Reading ......................................................................................................................................... 169 Science .......................................................................................................................................... 181
Appendix 5: Pilot trial item pool characteristics ...................................................................... 195
Mathematics ................................................................................................................................. 195
5
Reading ......................................................................................................................................... 198 Science .......................................................................................................................................... 201
6
Chapter 1: Introduction
PISA
1. The OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) is a
collaborative effort among OECD member countries to measure how well 15-year-old students
approaching the end of compulsory schooling are prepared to meet the challenges of today’s
knowledge societies. The assessment is forward-looking: rather than focusing on the extent to
which these students have mastered a specific school curriculum: it looks at their ability to use
their knowledge and skills to meet real-life challenges. This orientation reflects a change in
curricular goals and objectives, which are increasingly concerned with what students can do
with what they learn at school.
2. PISA surveys take place every three years. The first survey took place in 2000
(followed by a further 11 countries in 2002), the second in 2003, the third in 2006, and the
fourth in 2009; the results of these surveys have been published in a series of reports (OECD,
2001, 2003, 2004, 2007, 2010) and a wide range of thematic and technical reports. Further
assessment is taking place in 2012. For each assessment, one of science, reading and
mathematics is chosen as the major domain and given greater emphasis. The remaining two
areas, the minor domains, are assessed less thoroughly.
3. PISA is an age-based survey, assessing 15-year-old students in school in grade
seven or higher. These students are approaching the end of compulsory schooling in most
participating countries, and school enrolment at this level is close to universal in almost all
OECD countries.
4. The PISA assessments take a literacy perspective, which focuses on the extent to
which students can apply the knowledge and skills they have learned and practised at school
when confronted with situations and challenges for which that knowledge may be relevant. That
is, PISA assesses the extent to which students can use their reading skills to understand and
interpret the various kinds of written material that they are likely to meet as they negotiate their
daily lives; the extent to which students can use their mathematical knowledge and skills to
solve various kinds of numerical and spatial challenges and problems; and the extent to which
students can use their scientific knowledge and skills to understand, interpret and resolve
various kinds of scientific situations and challenges.
5. PISA also uses student questionnaires to collect information from students on
various aspects of their home, family and school background, and school questionnaires to
collect information from schools about various aspects of organisation and educational
provision in schools.
PISA-Based Test for Schools
6. Since 2000, a growing number of countries around the world have taken advantage
of the opportunity to participate in PISA. There were 32 countries who participated in PISA
2000; the number has grown to 67 in PISA 2012. Generally, whole countries participate,
although there are some regions, such as Hong Kong, Macao and Shanghai from China, which
participate separately.
7. While this regular pattern of assessment has been taking place, there has been a
growing interest from entities smaller than countries to participate in a test that gives results
with a link to PISA and therefore allows them to make comparisons with PISA. These entities
might be regions, education systems or individual schools. There has also been an interest in
being able to do this assessment outside the normal three-yearly PISA schedule.
8. In response to this the Australian Council for Educational Research, which has been
responsible for the design and implementation of all PISA surveys up to 2012, was contracted to
produce a test that would be comparable to PISA. This test has become known as the PISA-
7
Based Test for Schools, to take account of its emphasis being focused on students in regions or
individual schools.
9. The assessment instrument was created in two phases, each of which will be
described in more detail in Chapter 2: Test design and test development.
Phase 1
10. The first phase was based on the original OECD request for a set of items that
would allow the three main areas of interest (domains) – reading, mathematics and science – to
be assessed in a single two-hour test. This required the creation of 40 minutes of testing time for
each domain.
11. To calculate the characteristics of the items they were placed into a trial program
which also equated the items to existing secure PISA items. This trial test and equating study
took place in four countries: Australia, Ireland, the USA and the UK.
Phase 2
12. The second phase involved developing sufficient additional items to create a test
with 90 minutes of testing time for each of the three domains of reading, mathematics and
science. This expanded item set was also placed into a field trial operation to test its
characteristics. At the same time the new items were equated with items that had been created
for Phase 1.
Organisation of this report
13. This technical report is designed to describe the technical aspects of the project at a
sufficient level of detail to give an understanding of the processes that were undertaken to arrive
at the assessment instrument which is being used in the Pilot Trial of the project.
14. There are six chapters in this report:
Chapter One—Introduction: Overall description of the project
Chapter Two— Test design and test development
a) Test designs of two field trial and equating studies with a few explanatory words
b) Test development
- Quality control measures (panelling, cog labs, critical friend reviews)
- Characteristics of the Phase 1 and Phase 2 Field Trial and Equating Study (FT-
ES) instruments.
Chapter Three—Field operations for the field trial and equating studies
- Country operations
- Coding
Chapter Four— Preparation of instruments for the pilot trial of the PISA-Based Test for
Schools
- Test design
- Selection of items
- Blueprints and achieved characteristics of the cognitive instruments
- National adaptations of the instruments
- Construction of the cognitive and questionnaire instruments
- Preparation of manuals
8
Chapter Five—Equating methods and results
- Differential item functioning by gender
- Item-by-country interaction (country DIF)
- Test targeting
- DPS from PISA showing item distributions for each domain
Chapter Six—recommendation for refreshing the item pool
Appendices: Detailed appendices of results pertaining to the chapters of the report are provided
including an audit of items developed for the Phase 1 and Phase 2 FT-ES (Appendix 1), item
analyses for all items in the pilot trial (Appendix 3), pilot trial item characteristic curves
showing all and gender performance (Appendix 4) and the pilot trial set of items with scale
scores and logit values (Appendix 5).
9
Chapter 2: Test design and test development
15. This chapter describes the test design and test development for Phase 1 and Phase 2
Field Trail and Equating Study (FT-ES) of the PISA-Based Test for Schools.
16. The main purposes of the field trial and equating study were to:
Select items for the PISA-Based Test for Schools from the newly developed item pool;
and
Place newly developed items on the existing PISA scale.
Test Design
Phase 1 FT-ES test design
17. The Phase 1 FT-ES item pool consisted of 194 items where 131 items were newly
developed items and 64 were link items selected from the main PISA assessment. The number
of the new and link items included in each of the domains is shown in Table 1.
Table 1 Number of new and link items in Phase 1 FT-ES
Domain
New
items
Link
items TOTAL
Mathematics 32 16 48
Reading 49 27 76
Science 50 20 70
TOTAL 131 63 194
18. Table 2 presents the Phase 1 FT-ES test design.
Table 2 Booklet design for Phase 1 FT-ES
Booklet 1 M1 M2
Booklet 2 M2 M3
Booklet 3 M3 M4
Booklet 4 M4 M1
Booklet 5 S1 S2
Booklet 6 S2 S3
Booklet 7 S3 S4
Booklet 8 S4 S1
Booklet 9 R1 R2
Booklet 10 R2 R3
Booklet 11 R3 R4
Booklet 12 R4 R5
Booklet 13 R5 R1
19. The Phase 1 FT-ES items were allocated to thirteen clusters (four mathematics
clusters, five reading clusters and four science clusters) with each cluster representing 30
10
minutes of test time. M1 to M4 denote the mathematics clusters, R1 to R5 denote the reading
clusters and S1 to S4 denote the science clusters.
20. Each cluster included a combination of new Phase 1 FT-ES items and link items
selected from the PISA main surveys’ item pool. The number of new items in the Phase 1 field
trial pools was twice as big as the number of link items. The number of items per cluster varies
according to domain, based on timing analysis conducted in PISA field trials and main surveys.
21. The items were presented to students in thirteen one-hour booklets, with each
booklet being composed of two clusters of the same domain. There are four each of
mathematics and science booklets and five reading booklets. Each cluster appears in both first
and second position in the booklets, to neutralise position effect in calibrating the items.
22. Another feature of the Phase 1 FT-ES test design is that each domain cluster
appears with two other clusters of the domain. For example cluster M1 appears with the clusters
M2 and M4. This allows establishing a linkage between single domain booklets for the item
calibration.
Phase 2 FT-ES test design
23. The Phase 2 FT-ES item pool consisted of 226 items where 159 items were newly
developed items and 64 were link items selected from the Phase 1 FT-ES. The number of new
and link items included in each of the domains is shown in Table 3.
Table 3 Number of new and link items in Phase 2 FT-ES
Domain
New
items
Link
items TOTAL
Mathematics 44 18 62
Reading 51 27 78
Science 64 22 86
TOTAL 159 67 226
24. Table 4 presents the Phase 2 FT-ES test design.
11
Table 4 Booklet design for Phase 2 FT-ES
Booklet 14 M5 M6
Booklet 15 M6 M7
Booklet 16 M7 M8
Booklet 17 M8 M9
Booklet 18 M9 M5
Booklet 19 R6 R7
Booklet 20 R7 R8
Booklet 21 R8 R9
Booklet 22 R9 R10
Booklet 23 R10 R6
Booklet 24 S5 S6
Booklet 25 S6 S7
Booklet 26 S7 S8
Booklet 27 S8 S9
Booklet 28 S9 S5
25. The Phase 2 FT-ES items were allocated to fifteen item clusters (five mathematics
clusters, five reading clusters and five science clusters) with each cluster representing 30
minutes of test time. M5 to M9 denote the mathematics clusters, R5 to R10 denote the reading
clusters, and S5 to S9 denote the science clusters.
26. Each clusters included a combination of new Phase 2 FT-ES items and link items
selected from the Phase 1 FT-ES new item pool.
27. The items were presented to students in fifteen one-hour booklets, with each
booklet being composed of two clusters of the same domain. Each cluster appears in both first
and second position in the booklets, to neutralise position effect in calibrating the items.
28. Similarly to the Phase 1 FT-ES test design, each Phase 2 FT-ES cluster appears
with two other clusters from the same domain. For example cluster M5 appears with the clusters
M6 and M9.
Test Development
The test development team
29. All item writers for the PISA-Based Test for Schools were drawn from the teams of
professional test developers in ACER’s Assessment and Reporting research programs. The item
writers formed into three smaller teams, one for each of the domains of mathematics, reading
and science. Each team included individuals who have been involved in test development for
the PISA international surveys. Each domain team was led by a coordinating test developer,
under the overall coordination of one of the project directors. Table 5 shows the number of test
developers for each domain.
12
Table 5 Number of test developers per domain
Domain Number of test
developers
Mathematics 5
Reading 8
Science 7
30. Test development for Phase 1 FT-ES was undertaken from August to December
2010. Test development for Phase 2 FT-ES was undertaken from July to October 2011.
Item development process
31. Items used in the field trial and equating studies, other than the PISA main survey
items used for linking in Phase 1 FT-ES, were for the most part developed specifically for the
PISA-Based Test for Schools. For reading and science, all items were developed exclusively for
the purpose. For mathematics, since there was an overlap in the item development periods for
PISA 2012 and Phase 1 of the PISA-Based Test for Schools project, and several of the ACER
mathematics test developers were working on both projects, some of the ACER-developed
items for PISA-Based Test for Schools mathematics began as part of the larger pool under
consideration for PISA 2012. Some of the ACER-developed items that were NOT selected for
the PISA 2012 Field Trial were reconsidered for the PISA-Based Test for Schools. Ultimately
26 such items were used as part of the PISA-Based Test for Schools.
32. Over the first five cycles of PISA, ACER has established a sound methodology for
developing high quality assessment instruments. Central to this methodology are various
cognitive laboratory methods designed to ensure that the intended cognitive outcomes are
reflected in the items, that the items developed have an appropriate distribution of difficulties,
and that the coding guides are adequate for consistent and accurate coding by expert coders. The
activities described below have been refined over the years since the inception of PISA and
were employed by the item development teams for PISA-Based Test for Schools.
Cognitive laboratory methods
33. Cognitive laboratory methods used for PISA include three types of activities:
cognitive walkthrough, cognitive interview and cognitive comparison studies.
Cognitive walkthrough: After initial development by individual item writers, all items
undergo cognitive walkthrough (sometimes referred to as item panelling, or item
shredding). At this stage, items are given the closest and most detailed possible scrutiny by
professional item writers to ensure that from every conceivable perspective, each item can
achieve its intended purpose. Items routinely undergo significant modification and
improvement following this step.
Cognitive interview: Items are used in small group cognitive interviews, with a test
developer working with four or five 14- to 16-year-olds. Each item is exposed to a small
group of students. “Think aloud” methods are used with individuals as they tackle items.
Cognitive group interviews are also used to further expose fundamental aspects of how
students perceive and react to items. The information gained through these cognitive
interviews provides hard evidence about the cognitive processes involved as students tackle
test items.
Cognitive comparison studies: This third type of cognitive laboratory involves piloting
sets of items with larger numbers of students in schools. Each unit is piloted with a
convenience sample of about 30 students reasonably representative of 15 year-olds in the
country concerned. This enables the relative difficulty of items to be compared (e.g., error
13
percentage, time to complete) and real student responses to be obtained to refine and
illustrate scoring guides.
34. The first two of these cognitive laboratory techniques were employed in the
development of all PISA-Based Test for Schools items. Cognitive comparison studies were used
only for the 26 mathematics items that began life as potential PISA 2012 items.
35. The items that survived the initial cognitive walkthrough and were submitted to
cognitive interview procedures are listed in Appendix 1. Appendix 1 shows the categorisation of
each item according to its major PISA framework variables. It also indicates the origin of each
item and its use in the two field trial and equating study administrations.
36. The number of items developed per domain in Phase 1 is shown in Table 6.
Table 6 New item development for Phase 1
Domain Developed to
cognitive interview
stage
Required for
Phase 1 FT-ES
Required for
two-hour PBT test:
40 minutes per
domain
Mathematics 65 32 16
Reading 113 47 20
Science 94 48 22
Total 270 127 58
37. For the Phase 1 development, the goal was a yield of sufficient items for a two-hour
assessment, with all students administered the same test material, comprising 40 minutes of
testing per domain.
38. For the Phase 2 development, the goal was to develop enough items to augment the
original yield so that the final total yield would be an item pool comprising 90 minutes of
testing per domain. Accordingly, test development for Phase 2 was targeted at developing an
additional 50 minutes of testing per domain.
39. The number of items developed per domain in Phase 2 is shown in Table 7.
Table 7 New item development for Phase 2
Domain Developed to
cognitive interview
stage
Required for
Phase 2 FT-ES
Required for
additional
50 minutes per
domain
Mathematics 96 40 20
Reading 112 50 25
Science 131 64 32
Total 308 154 77
40. It will be seen that the number of items developed to cognitive interview stage was
at least four times the number required for the final yield (a similar ratio to that applied for
PISA, from development to main survey). For both Phase 1 and Phase 2, the aim was to develop
enough items per domain to populate a given amount of testing time (40 minutes and 50
minutes respectively). Note that the calculation of the number of items required for the two-hour
14
PBT test, and hence the numbers of items developed at each preceding stage, was calculated
according to the time estimates for PISA main surveys, which vary according to domain.
Critical friend reviews
41. ACER sought feedback from external domain experts in order to check and refine
the quality of the items to be selected for PBT. Given the central aim of the PBT project to
emulate PISA quality in the test instruments, we approached members of past and current PISA
expert groups, and highly-regarded test developers from the PISA Consortia 2000-2012. All
experts who were approached (two mathematics, three reading and two science experts) agreed
to assist in this task. The critical friends are listed in Appendix 2.
42. Along with the items themselves, the experts were provided with the most recent
versions of the relevant PISA framework; an item feedback spreadsheet listing each item in the
relevant set and tabulating its main framework characteristics; and item feedback guidelines.
43. Modelled on the national centre reviews of items conducted for PISA, feedback was
requested on a number of criteria: curriculum relevance and interest level for 15-year-olds,
authenticity of context, and relevance to preparedness for life. Experts were also asked to
identify any cultural or gender concerns, potential translation issues, problems with the coding
guides or other issues such as the categorisation according to framework variables. Finally they
were asked to give an overall rating on priority for inclusion in the final instrument.
44. The items and supplementary material were uploaded to a designated secure area of
the MyPISA website (https://mypisa.acer.edu.au).
45. The critical review process was implemented in two batches. Items included in
Phase 1 FT-ES were dispatched to the experts in mid-September 2011 and their feedback was
returned by end October 2011. Items included in Phase 2 FT-ES were dispatched in early
January 2012 and the experts returned feedback by early February 2012.
46. While providing invaluable critical reviews, all experts commented on the “PISA-
likeness” and overall high quality of the material.
Item selection and preparation for the field trial and equating studies
Phase 1 item selection
47. The Phase 1 FT-ES instruments comprised, for each domain, sets of new items
developed for the project and a set of secure link items from previous PISA cycles (see Table 1
for the numbers of items in each category per domain).
48. In selecting link items, PISA domain leaders considered framework balance, range
of difficulty and a high level of reliability as prime criteria.
49. For the new items, the PBT test development coordinator for each domain
considered the item pool available and, drawing on evidence from cognitive laboratories, made
a selection for the Phase 1 Field Trial and Equating Study based on the following criteria:
fit to framework, such that the set reflected the target percentage ranges per category as
set out in the framework;
a range of (predicted) difficulty;
a fair and balanced representation of content, including concepts central to the domain;
interest level for 15-year-olds;
likely endurance (able to stand the test of time); and
lack of third party copyright obstacles.
Phase 2 item selection
50. The Phase 2 FT-ES included new items developed for Phase 2 and a set of linking
items that had been developed for and included in Phase 1 FT-ES (see Table 3 for the numbers
of items in each category).
15
51. In selecting the linking items from Phase 1, test developers considered:
the psychometric quality of the items, based on the empirical results of the Phase 1 FT-
ES in Australia, which had been administered, coded and analysed by end of
September 2011;
feedback on the Phase 1 items from critical friends; and
framework balance and range of difficulty.
52. To select the new items that had been developed for Phase 2, the same list of
criteria as that used to select the new items for Phase 1 FT-ES was employed: namely, fit to
framework, a range of difficulty, good representation of content, interest level for 15-year-olds,
likely endurance over time, and permission to use any third party material.
National adaptations
53. Source versions of each unit selected for each of the field trial and equating studies
were finalised at ACER and a Translation and Adaptation Spreadsheet (TAS) for the new items
was prepared for each phase, modelled on PISA TAS.
54. Coordinators at each FT-ES national location – consortium partners in Ireland, the
UK and USA – completed the TAS and returned it to ACER. ACER test development
coordinators for each domain considered each proposed adaptation and conducted an email
discussion with the national centre to resolve any issues. Finally, ACER test developers made a
decision about whether to accept suggested adaptations or not, guided by judgement of what
was necessary/important/allowable to adapt, and what should not be adapted (for example
because the proposed adaptation might make an item more difficult or easier); and guided also
by consistency in decisions across the participating countries. ACER then implemented the
agreed adaptations in national version units. The completed TAS, recording ACER’s decision
on each issue, was returned to the country/national centre for information. ACER test
developers completed the Australian versions.
55. The UK versions of the units were subsequently used as the source versions, in line
with the OECD policy of using British English for PISA source versions. The (UK) source
versions of the units were provided to the international schools that participated in Phase 2.
56. A booklet shell based on the booklet shell used for PISA main surveys was
designed for the PBT field trial and equating studies. Since no student questionnaire was
included in the FT-ES, a very short set of questions about student background was included at
the end of the test booklet, to collect information about the gender, age and grade level of each
participant. The student background page in the booklets for international schools also asked
about the language background of the student. The booklet shell was sent to the national centres
and groups for each Phase, for suggested adaptations. These were implemented by ACER in the
construction of the national materials for the field trial and equating studies.
57. The national versions of the units were assembled into national versions of clusters,
booklets and coding guides, and despatched via secure ftp sites to national centres for printing.
Field trial and equating study instrument characteristics
58. In this section we present the main framework characteristics of the item sets
fielded in each of the two field trial and equating studies. For each domain, tables set out the
number and percentage of items administered in Phase 1 FT-ES and Phase 2 FT-ES according
to variables defined in the relevant framework1. Target percentages from the framework are also
shown.
1 OECD. (2010). PISA 2009 Framework: Key Competencies in Reading, Mathematics and
Science. Paris: OECD.
16
Mathematics
Table 8 Mathematics instruments for field trial and equating studies: Process variable
Variable Phase 1: new items Phase 2: new items Frame-work
Target
N % N % %
Employing 19 59 24 56 55
Formulating 7 22 13 30 25
Interpreting 6 19 6 14 20
Total 32 100 43 100 100
Table 9 Mathematics instruments for field trial and equating studies: Content variable
Variable Phase 1: new items Phase 2: new items Frame-work
Target
N % N % %
Change and relationships
9 28% 10 23% 32
Quantity 8 25% 11 26% 23
Space and shape 6 19% 12 28% 25
Uncertainty and data
9 28% 10 23% 20
Total 32 100 43 100 100
Table 10 Mathematics instruments for field trial and equating studies: Context variable
Variable Phase 1: new items Phase 2: new items Frame-work
Target
N % N % %
Occupational 8 25% 9 21% 23
Personal 4 13% 11 26% 25
Scientific 11 34% 8 19% 27
Societal 9 28% 15 35% 25
Total 32 100 43 100 100
17
Table 11 Mathematics instruments for field trial and equating studies: Item format
variable
Variable Phase 1: new items Phase 2: new items Frame-work
Target
N % N % %
Selected response 14 44% 15 35% 36
Constructed Response Expert
11 34% 9 21% 17
Constructed Response Manual
7 22% 19 44% 47
Total 32 100 43 100 100
18
Reading
Table 12 Reading instruments for field trial and equating studies: Text format variable
Variable Phase 1: new items Phase 2: new items Frame-work
Target
N % N % %
Continuous 35 73% 31 61% 60
Non-continuous 13 27% 15 29% 30
Mixed and multiple
0 0% 5 10% 10
Total 48 100 51 100 100
Table 13 Reading instruments for field trial and equating studies: Text type variable
Variable Phase 1: new items Phase 2: new items Frame-work
Target
N % N % %
Narration 5 10% 15 29% 15
Description 20 42% 10 20% Not specified
Exposition 13 27% 4 8% Not specified
Argumentation 10 21% 11 22% Not specified
Instruction 0 0% 11 22% Not specified
Total 48 100 51 100 100
Table 14 Reading instruments for field trial and equating studies: Situation variable
Variable Phase 1:
new items
Phase 2:
new items
Frame-work
Target
N % N % %
Personal 19 40% 27 53% 28
Public 11 23% 8 16% 28
Occupational 4 8% 5 10% 16
Educational 14 29% 11 22% 28
Total 48 100 51 100 100
19
Table 15 Reading instruments for field trial and equating studies: Aspect variable
Variable Phase 1: new items Phase 2: new items Frame-work
Target
N % N % %
Access and retrieve
13 27% 12 24% 25
Integrate and interpret
22 46% 27 53% 50
Reflect and evaluate
13 27% 12 24% 25
Total 48 100 51 100 100
Table 16 Reading instruments for field trial and equating studies: Item format variable
Variable Phase 1: new items Phase 2: new items Frame-work
Target
N % N % %
Selected response 24 50% 32 63% 55
Constructed response
24 50% 19 37% 45
Total 48 100 51 100 100
20
Science
Table 17 Science instruments for field trial and equating studies: Competency variable
Variable Phase 1: new items Phase 2: new items Frame-work
Target
N % N % %
Explaining phenomena
26 51% 30 47% 41
Using evidence 15 29% 19 30% 36
Identifying issues 10 20% 15 23% 23
Total 51 100 64 100 100
Table 18 Science instruments for field trial and equating studies: Knowledge variable
Variable Phase 1: new items Phase 2: new items Frame-work
Target
N % N % %
Of science 27 53% 32 50% 50
About science 24 47% 32 50% 50
Total 51 100 64 100 100
Table 19 Science instruments for field trial and equating studies: Knowledge of science
variable
Variable Phase 1: new items Phase 2: new items Frame-work
Target
N % N % %
Physical systems 8 30% 9 28% 27
Earth and space systems
7 26% 9 28% 23
Technological systems
3 11% 5 16% 16
Life systems 9 33% 9 28% 34
Total 27 100 32 100 100
21
Table 20 Science instruments for field trial and equating studies: Knowledge about science
variable
Variable Phase 1: new items Phase 2: new items Phase 2: link items from
Phase 1
Frame-work
Target
N % N % N % %
Enquiry 11 46% 15 47% 6 50% 50
Explanations 13 54% 17 53% 6 50% 50
Total 24 100 32 100 12 100 100
Table 21 Science instruments for field trial and equating studies: Item format variable
Variable Phase 1: new items Phase 2: new items Phase 2: link items from
Phase 1
Frame-work
Target
N % N % N % %
Selected response 31 61% 44 69% 12 55% 64
Constructed response
20 39% 20 31% 10 45% 36
Total 51 100 64 100 22 100 100
22
Chapter 3: Field Operations for the field trial and equating studies
59. This chapter describes the conduct of the field trial and equating studies, and the
coding operation for constructed-response items.
Recruitment of countries and locales for the field trial and equating studies
60. The brief for the development of the PISA-Based Test for Schools instrument called
for the items to be fielded in four English-speaking countries. Attracting countries and schools
to take part in the study was a major challenge of this project, and is one of the main reasons for
the elongated timeline. ACER initially approached PISA national centres, partly because of our
confidence that they would ensure security of the PISA materials, and also because of their
familiarity with PISA administration standards such as those pertaining to quality assurance of
printing, distribution and test administration. ACER was only partly successful in recruiting
PISA national centres. One difficulty was that smaller English-testing countries were conscious
of the PISA main survey administration looming in 2012 and understandably did not want to
threaten their capacity to meet sampling requirements for PISA 2012 by over-burdening the
limited pool of schools with further requests for test administration.
61. Eventually, four country centres were recruited for the Phase 1 FT-ES, and three
country centres and a group of international schools (all with English as the language of
instruction) were recruited for the Phase 2 FT-ES.
62. Table 22 and Table 23 show the countries/centres for the two Phases, and the
achieved dates for testing, coding and initial data analysis.
Table 22 Phase 1 Field Trial and Equating Study
Country Responsible institution Testing
dates
Coding Initial data
analysis
Australia ACER May-June 2011
June-July 2011
September 2011
Ireland Educational Research Centre, St Patrick’s College, Dublin (PISA national centre)
November 2011
December 2011
January 2012
UK National Foundation for Educational Research (PISA national centre)
November-December 2011
January 2012 January 2012
USA Westat (PISA international consortium partner)
January 2012 February 2012
February–March 2012
23
Table 23 Phase 2 Field Trial and Equating Study
Country/Location Responsible institution Testing
dates
Coding Initial data
analysis
Australia ACER November-December 2011
January 2012 February–March 2012
UK National Foundation for Educational Research (PISA national centre)
January 2012 February 2012
February–March 2012
USA Westat (PISA international consortium partner)
January 2012 February 2012
February–March 2011
Europe and UAE (international schools)
ACER (staff based in Germany and ACER’s Dubai office)
January 2012 February 2012
February–March 2012
Field trial operations in participating countries and groups
Quality of materials
63. Countries followed the PISA 2012 Field Trial quality assurance procedures for the
printing of test booklets. This included using the same paper and print quality that had been
agreed upon by the PISA Consortium in the 2012 Field Trial.
64. When producing the test materials, ACER ensured that the layout and pagination of
all national versions were equivalent to the source version.
Recruitment of schools
65. Table 24 shows the numbers of schools and students participating in each phase of
the field trial and equating studies, by country or group, as well as some information about the
gender and language background of the students. Participants were asked to complete a very
short background questionnaire at the end of the test booklet. For all administrations, students
were asked to record their gender. For the International Schools administrations only, students
were also asked to record whether the language spoken at home was English or a language other
than English. Discrepancies between the numbers for “All students” and for the gender and
language subgroups are accounted for by students having failed to complete this information.
24
Table 24 Numbers of schools and students by country/group and phase
Country/group Field trial and
equating
study
Number of
schools
participating
Number of students
confirmed by
schools
Number of students participating
All Boys Girls English Other Lang
Australia Phase 1 22 655 576 243 333 Not available
Not available
Australia Phase 2 29 897 749 392 357 Not available
Not available
England Phase 1 11 698 564 288 272 Not available
Not available
England Phase 2 11 829 674 363 311 Not available
Not available
International Schools – Dubai
Phase 2 14 969 816 422 394 184 616
International Schools – Europe
Phase 2 3 124 89 45 44 7 72
Ireland Phase 1 12 Not available 781 346 435 Not available
Not available
USA Phases 1 and 2
12 1859 1412 689 703 Not available
Not available
25
66. The following paragraphs provide more detail about each of the countries and
locales that participated in the Phase 1 and/or Phase 2 FT-ES.
Australia
67. Schools that ACER wished to approach were selected through the standard ACER
sampling process. The sample included schools from all Catholic, Independent and Government
jurisdictions. Permission to approach schools in Catholic and Government jurisdictions was
sought and approved before contacting the schools within these areas.
68. Although schools were to provide about 25 students (one class) to participate, actual
participation numbers were about 10-15% lower than the number of students confirmed from
the schools.
England
69. All the schools recruited for the equating study were from the Academies Enterprise
Trust. AET provided NFER with a list of their academies and these academies were invited to
take part in the study.
70. The response rate to the invitation letter was poor and reminder phone calls were
made in order to boost recruitment and meet the required participation rate. AET helped in the
recruitment of schools.
International schools
Dubai
71. For the Phase 2 FT-ES, only private schools following international curriculums,
with English as the language of instruction, were targeted. The sample from each school
included both genders. To limit the number of schools selected, only large schools were
sampled.
Europe
72. A small number of international schools in Europe participated in Phase 2 field trial
and equating study FT-ES. Only schools in which English is the language of instruction were
included.
Ireland
73. A convenience sample was used for the Phase 1 FT-ES. Schools were selected on
the basis that they were not sampled for the PISA 2012 main survey in Ireland.
74. By using the stratification variables used for the PISA 2012 main survey sample,
Ireland aimed to maintain a balance in terms of gender mix, SES composition and school type.
To limit the number of schools selected, only large schools were sampled.
United States
75. The United States equating study school sample was a self-selected group of
schools in central Iowa. The schools were in districts that formed a consortium organised by an
education advocacy business organisation, the Des Moines Business/Education Alliance.
76. The Business/Education Alliance gathered school participation and contact
information through the districts and passed the information to Westat. Westat then made
contact with the school coordinators at each school.
77. Phase 1 and Phase 2 field trial and equating studies were combined and run
simultaneously in participating schools in the USA.
26
Recruitment of test administrators
78. In Australia and the United Kingdom, test administrators for PISA-Based Test for
Schools had been previously trained for the PISA 2012 field trial. Australia hired qualified
teachers as test administrators and the United Kingdom hired former teachers. Similarly, in
Ireland test administrators were retired school principals or inspectors who had worked for
previous PISA administrations.
79. In the United States, test administrators were hired from the National Assessment of
Educational Progress (NAEP) and had wide experience in conducting student assessments. The
Field Manager for national PISA oversaw the staff.
80. For the international schools field operations, ACER staff located in Europe and
Dubai administered the tests, after training with colleagues from the PISA international or
national project teams.
Administration at the classroom level
81. All countries reported that the test administration went well. For a very small
number of schools in Ireland and Dubai, student discipline was an issue during the test session.
In the United States, some schools did not have adequate space to assess the large number of
students which meant that some sessions needed to be split into small groups or be conducted at
different times of the day.
82. The main issue that countries encountered however was absent students. In
England, some students refused to participate in the test or completed very little of the test
booklet. Test Administrators in Australia coordinated directly with schools to accommodate the
most suitable dates and times in order to minimise disruptions to the normal school timetables
and ensure that there were fewer absent students. In the United States, make-up sessions were
held to ensure that an adequate number of students was tested.
Security arrangements and confidentiality of the test material
83. In all countries, PISA security standards were applied to the PISA-Based Test for
Schools materials. The test administrators directly managed the distribution, administration and
collection of the materials at all times when in the schools and no copying of materials was
permitted. Test administrators ensured that all materials were returned promptly to the national
centres after testing. The national centres then securely delivered all the materials to ACER by
courier for coding.
Coding
Management and sequence of the coding operations
84. All coding of constructed-response items for the two field trial and equating studies
was conducted at ACER’s Melbourne offices. The overall manager of the coding process, and
the test developers who conducted training and quality control during the operation, were ACER
staff with experience in the conduct of coding operations in PISA international and PISA
national (Australia and Dubai /the United Arab Emirates), in 2009 and/or 2012.
85. Because of the concatenated implementation of the field trial and equating studies
across the participating countries and entities, coding was carried out in several stages for both
Phase 1 and Phase 2.
86. Table 25 shows the sequence of coding operations.
27
Table 25 Sequence of coding operations
Phase Participating country / entity Approximate Dates
Phase 1 Australia 16 June – 10 July 2011
Phase 1 Ireland 12 – 16 December 2011
Phase 1 United Kingdom 16 – 27 January 2012
Phase 1 United States 6 – 17 February 2012
Phase 2 Australia 16 – 27 January 2012
Phase 2 United Kingdom 6 – 17 February 2012
Phase 2 United States 6 – 17 February 2012
Phase 2 International Schools (Europe and UAE) 6 – 17 February 2012
Recruitment of coders
87. Coders were recruited from the pool of experienced coders who have worked in
PISA national coding teams for Australian and Dubai / UAE coding operations for each domain.
Many have been part of PISA coding teams since 2000. Coders were typically secondary school
teachers experienced in relevant disciplines who have retired or were on leave. As for PISA
main surveys, mathematics and science coding was undertaken by the same individuals (trained
and experienced mathematics and/or science teachers). Reading coding was undertaken by
secondary English or Humanities teachers.
88. There was a high degree of continuity in the coding teams across the separate
coding operations for Phase 1 and 2. The teams were expanded for the last phase of coding to
ensure rapid processing of the large amount of material. The total numbers of individuals
involved were seven reading coders and 14 mathematics and science coders.
89. Table 26 shows the number of coders per domain for each operation.
28
Table 26 Number of coders for each coding operation, by domain
Phase Participating country / entity Number of coders
Phase 1 Australia 4 reading, 4 mathematics,
4 science
Phase 1 Ireland 3 reading 6 mathematics/science
Phase 1 United Kingdom 6 reading, 8 mathematics/science
Phase 1 United States 6 reading, 8 mathematics/science
Phase 2 Australia 6 reading, 8 mathematics/science
Phase 2 United Kingdom 6 reading, 8 mathematics/science
Phase 2 United States 6 reading, 8 mathematics/science
Phase 2 International Schools (Europe and UAE) 6 reading, 8 mathematics/science
Preparation of coder training material
90. PISA main survey items were used for linking in Phase 1. For these items, coding
workshop material from the main surveys was used for training.
91. For the new material developed for PBT Phase 1 and Phase 2, test developers
selected student responses representing the various codes from the first batches of student
booklets that were returned to ACER from the FT-ES. These samples were reproduced in hard
copy and used in training along with the coding guides for each item, to promote consistency.
For both Phase 1 and Phase 2, initial sample responses used for training were selected from the
Australian student responses, as these were the first batches of student responses available.
Coder training
92. Coder training began with an orientation to the program and the assessment
constructs. Test development leaders for each domain then led the coders through each
constructed response item in a cluster, with discussion of coding guide descriptions and sample
responses. The coders had an opportunity to practise applying the coding guides on “live”
student responses. Test developers monitored consistency and accuracy on these sample
responses and remediated where necessary. In general, training was conducted on two clusters,
and then operational coding proceeded on those clusters.
93. Training was conducted at several points: for each new pool of items (Phase 1 and
Phase 2); whenever new coders were added to the team; and in the form of a short refresher if
there had been a long gap since the last operation.
Coding operation
94. Coders worked at the ACER coding centre in Melbourne, for a maximum of six
hours per day, with breaks every one and a half hours. Coding was conducted by item and by
cluster. Within each coding operation, all coders coded a proportion of the responses for every
constructed-response item, so that a maximum number of coding perspectives for each item was
collected.
29
95. Test development leaders were on call for discussing any substantive issues arising
during the coding operation – for example, unanticipated responses, or inadequate or ambiguous
wording in the coding guides (or in the items themselves). In the case of coding guides, these
were occasionally adjusted during the coding operation, and all previously coded responses
recoded.
Coding quality control
96. Since the field trial and the equating study were conducted as one operation, there
was no opportunity to review and adjust coding guides after the field trial that is available in
PISA itself. To compensate for this, it was decided to code every response twice, as a quality
control measure, with two independent codings. The first coder entered his or her code on a
coding sheet, which was removed before the booklet was given to the second coder. The second
coder entered his or code onto the booklet.
97. Data entry was conducted immediately following the coding, and any discrepancies
between the two codes for each response were highlighted. A member of the relevant coding
team then inspected the discrepancies against the student booklets. Where a straightforward
error was detected (such as the code for “incorrect” having been entered instead of the code for
“missing”), the coder entered the appropriate code as the third and finalised one. Where the
discrepancy indicated a difference of judgement, the response was referred to the lead test
developer, who made a decision as to the appropriate code, and entered it as the third and
finalised code.
98. In the course of the early stages of the coding operation for each phase, and as a
result of discrepancy coding, test developers made some adjustments to the coding guides. In
such cases, all student responses were recoded by the coding team to reflect the revised coding
guide.
99. In addition, lead coders for each domain kept a record of items that had caused
particular coding difficulties, such as frequent inconsistency in judgement. This information was
provided to the test developers, to feed into the subsequent selection of items for the Pilot Trial
Data entry and data cleaning
100. After initial data entry and entry of discrepancy codes by coders or test developers,
the data was delivered to the ACER psychometrics unit. Any invalid codes detected in the data
set were referred to the manager of coding operations for checking and correcting.
30
Chapter 4: Preparation of Instruments for the Pilot Trial of the PISA-Based Test for Schools
101. The aim of the field trial and equating studies described in the previous chapters
was to develop an assessment instrument for the PISA-Based Test for Schools, with similar
characteristics to the PISA main surveys that have been conducted in five administrations since
2000, comprising 90 minutes of testing time for each of the three domains of mathematics,
reading and science.
102. The OECD determined that an important step in the development and
implementation of the PISA-Based Test for Schools was to conduct a pilot trial with invited
schools and networks in May and June of 2012 using the developed assessment instrument.
103. The pilot round was planned with approximately 120–150 schools across three
English-speaking countries, with approximately 75–100 students participating in each school as
the target. In fact, schools in four countries were recruited by the OECD for the pilot trial:
Canada, Scotland, UK (excluding Scotland) and USA.
104. The objectives of the pilot trial were to test and validate elements of the PISA-
Based Test for Schools relating to (A) instrument design parameters; (B) accreditation process
of local test administration service providers and cost parameters; (C) quality assurance and
security procedures, and (D) reporting format of results to participating schools.
105. This chapter describes the test design, and test construction of the assessment
instruments, and preparation of materials including cognitive instruments, questionnaire
instruments and manuals for the pilot trial of the PISA-Based Test for Schools.
Test Design for the Pilot Trial
106. Table 27 sets out the test booklet design for the PISA-Based Test for Schools pilot
trial.
Table 27 Test booklet design
Book Block 1 Block 2 Block 3
1 R1 RSM M1
2 RSM M2 S2
3 M2 M1 R2
4 M1 S2 S1
5 S2 R2 R1
6 R2 S1 RSM
7 S1 R1 M2
107. The pool of items, selected from the new items created for this project and
administered in the field trial and equating studies conducted during 2011 and early 2012,
comprises about 93 minutes of testing time for each of the three domains of mathematics,
reading and science.
108. The design comprises two clusters of items from a single domain for each of
mathematics (M1 and M2), reading (R1 and R2) and science (S1 and S2), and one cluster
including items from all three domains (RSM). The key considerations in developing the test
design were as follows:
31
Each booklet is 120 minutes in length, to match the PISA main survey design and
therefore give PISA-Based Test for Schools students a “PISA-like” test experience.
The clusters in Booklets 1 to 7 are organised so that each cluster appears in three
separate booklets, in the first, second and third block (position). Furthermore, each pair
of clusters appears in one (and only one) booklet and each cluster appears with every
other cluster. This is to balance the effect of booklet position.
109. There was not enough material to create a fully-rotated design with 30-minute
clusters (which are used in the PISA main surveys). It was judged that full rotation of the
clusters and test length were priorities, as these factors will have more impact on test
performance than cluster length. It is anticipated that the mixing of domains in the hybrid cluster
will have little or no impact on test performance. The hybrid cluster comprises about 13–14
minutes of testing time for each domain. It may be noted that this amounts to slightly more test
material than specified in the agreed contract. An extra three to four minutes’ worth of items
was added for each domain to make up the number of minutes needed for the hybrid booklet.
110. The clusters were assembled so that each reflects, to the extent possible, the major
framework variables of the given domain, and so that each includes items of a range of
difficulties, based on estimations derived from analysis of data from the field trial and equating
studies.
Selection of Items for the Pilot Trial Cognitive Instruments
111. In selecting items for the Pilot Trial cognitive instruments, the test development
coordinator for each domain considered the item pool available from the two field trial and
equating studies and made a selection comprising approximately 93 minutes of testing time for
each of mathematics, reading and science.
112. In addition to the criteria that had governed the selection of items for the field trial
and equating studies (see paragraphs 47 to 52), selection for the pilot trial instruments had to
satisfy the following conditions:
The psychometric properties of all selected items had to be satisfactory (a description of
the psychometric analyses and outcomes is provided in Chapter 5: Equating Methods
and Results);
Items that generated coding problems had to be avoided unless those problems could be
properly addressed through modifications to the coding guides; and
Items given high priority ratings in the critical friend reviews were to be preferred, and
items with lower ratings were to be avoided.
113. In addition, the item set for each domain had to satisfy these conditions as far as
possible:
The major framework categories had to be populated as specified in the relevant
assessment framework; and
There had to be an appropriate distribution of item difficulties.
Blueprints and actual distribution of items and score points by key PISA framework variables
114. Table 28 to Table 41 show the targeting of the item set for each domain, and the
actual distribution achieved. In all cases the targets are based on the relevant targets in the PISA
main surveys (2009). The achieved distribution is reported in terms of both items and score
points; the number of score points is greater than the number of items because a small number
of items in each domain are polytomous, yielding two score points.
32
Mathematics
115. For mathematics the target number of items for 95 minutes of testing is about 40
items. Forty items were included in the pilot trial mathematics selection. Of these six items yield
two score points, so the total number of score points is 46.
Table 28 Mathematics instrument for pilot trial: Process variable
Target % Approximate
target no. of items
Actual no. of
items
Actual no. of
score points
Employing 55 22 20 22
Formulating 25 10 11 13
Interpreting 20 8 9 11
Total 100 40 40 46
Table 29 Mathematics instrument for pilot trial: Content variable
Target % Approximate
target no. of items
Actual no. of
items
Actual no. of
score points
Change and relationships 32 13 13 14
Quantity 23 9 9 10
Space and shape 25 10 10 13
Uncertainty and data 20 8 8 9
Total 100 40 40 46
Table 30 Mathematics instrument for pilot trial: Context variable
Target % Approximate
target no. of items
Actual no. of
items
Actual no. of
score points
Occupational 23 9 9 11
Personal 25 10 10 12
Scientific 27 11 11 12
Societal 25 10 10 11
Total 100 40 40 46
33
Table 31 Mathematics instrument for pilot trial: Item Type variable
Target % Approximate
target no. of items
Actual no. of
items
Actual no. of
score points
Constructed Response Expert
17 7 7 12
Constructed Response Manual
47 19 19 19
Complex Multiple Choice 8 3 3 4
Simple Multiple Choice 28 11 11 11
Total 100 40 40 46
Reading
116. For reading the target number of items for 95 minutes of testing was about 47 items.
There is one item that is not scored in the set (scoring of the response to this item,
PR6004Q05A, Museum Park, is combined with the score for PR6004Q05B). This item was
counted in determining the timing of the reading instrument, but is not counted in the following
tabulations; thus the number of items in totals shown below is 46. With three items yielding two
score points each, the total score points are 49.
Table 32 Reading instrument for pilot trial: Aspect variable
Target % Approximate
target no. of items
Actual no. of
items
Actual no. of
score points
Access and retrieve 25 11-13 17 18
Integrate and interpret 50 23-24 18 20
Reflect and evaluate 25 11-13 11 11
Total 100 47 46 49
Table 33 Reading instrument for pilot trial: Text format variable
Target % Approximate
target no. of items
Actual no. of
items
Actual no. of
score points
Continuous 60 28 30 33
Non-continuous 30 14 13 13
Mixed and multiple 10 5 3 3
Total 100 47 46 46
34
Table 34 Reading instrument for pilot trial: Text type variable
Target % Approximate
target no. of items
Actual no. of
items
Actual no. of
score points
Narration 15 7-8 8 9
Description (physical) Not specified
Not specified 15 16
Exposition (conceptual) Not specified
Not specified 8 8
Argumentation Not specified
Not specified 12 13
Instruction Not specified
Not specified 3 3
Total 100 47 46 49
Table 35 Reading instrument for pilot trial: Situation variable
Target % Approximate
target no. of items
Actual no. of
items
Actual no. of
score points
Personal 28 13 19 21
Public 28 13 8 8
Occupational 16 8 7 8
Educational 28 13 12 21
Total 100 47 46 49
Table 36 Reading instrument for pilot trial: Item format variable
Target % Approximate
target no. of items
Actual no. of
items
Actual no. of
score points
Constructed Response Expert
45 21
17 18
Constructed Response Manual
4 4
Complex Multiple Choice 55 26
7 9
Simple Multiple Choice 18 18
Total 100 47 46 49
Science
117. For science the target number of items for 95 minutes of testing was about 54 items.
This number of items was included in the pilot trial science selection, with five of the items
yielding two score points, for a total of 59 score points.
35
Table 37 Science instrument for pilot trial: Competency variable
Target % Approximate
target no. of items
Actual no. of
items
Actual no. of
score points
Explaining phenomena 41 22 22 24
Using evidence 36 20 20 23
Identifying issues 23 12 12 12
Total 100 54 54 59
Table 38 Science instrument for pilot trial: Knowledge variable
Target % Approximate
target no. of items
Actual no. of
items
Actual no. of
score points
Of science 50 27 25 28
About science 50 27 29 31
Total 100 54 54 59
Table 39 Science instrument for pilot trial: Knowledge of science variable
Target % Approximate
target no. of items
Actual no. of
items
Actual no. of
score points
Physical Systems 27 6-7 6 7
Earth and Space Systems 23 5-6 4 4
Technological Systems 16 4 5 7
Living Systems 34 8-9 10 10
Total 100 27 25 28
Table 40 Science instrument for pilot trial: Knowledge about science variable
Target % Approximate
target no. of items
Actual no. of
items
Actual no. of
score points
Enquiry 50 13-14 13 13
Explanations 50 13-14 16 18
Total 100 27 29 31
36
Table 41 Science instrument for pilot trial: Item format variable
Target % Approximate
target no. of items
Actual no. of
items
Actual no. of
score points
Constructed Response Expert
36 18-21
20 24
Constructed Response Manual
0 0
Complex Multiple Choice 64 32-36
16 17
Simple Multiple Choice 18 18
Total 100 54 54 59
National adaptation process for the pilot trial
Unit adaptation
United States and the United Kingdom (excluding Scotland)
118. As many source units were updated after the field trial and equating studies, it was
considered more reliable to adapt the pilot trial source units for national instruments rather than
bring the national versions of the FT-ES units up to date.
119. The FT-ES Test Administration Spreadsheets (TAS) were used to adapt the source
units. The FT-ES national versions of the units were also consulted. All national adaptations
listed in the TAS were verified by the test developers before finalising the United States and the
United Kingdom (excl. Scotland) national versions of the pilot trial units.
Scotland and Canada
120. Scotland and Canada had not participated in the field trial and equating studies. To
allow national adaptations for the pilot trial the centres coordinating were sent an updated TAS
for the pilot trial units and invited to make suggestions for adaptations using similar procedures
to those adopted for adaptations in the field trial and equating studies. Because of tight
schedules, however, there was less opportunity for negotiation. After agreed modifications had
been finalised by ACER test developers, adaptations were made directly to the source units.
121. All national versions of the units were checked by the instrument construction team
as well as the test developers to ensure that the adaptations were correctly implemented.
Booklet shell adaptations
122. The United Kingdom (excl. Scotland) and Scotland did not adapt the booklet shell
from the source version. The booklet shell adaptations that were agreed to for use by the United
States in the equating study were also used in the pilot trial. For Canada, the source booklet
shell was sent to the Canadian national centre for adaptation. No adaptation spreadsheet was
necessary and adaptation proposals from Canada were inserted by ACER directly into the
booklet shell.
Pilot trial cognitive instrument construction
Cluster construction
123. Source clusters were built from the finalised source units. Test developers reviewed
the source clusters to ensure that the pagination and item layout were correct. The national
versions of the clusters were then constructed using the national units and adjusted to match the
source clusters’ layout and pagination.
37
Booklet construction
124. Source booklet construction began after the source and national versions of the
clusters were finalised by the test developers. The source clusters were inserted into the booklet
shell and booklets were checked for pagination, layout, formatting and graphics before being
sent to test developers for the final checks. When the source booklets were finalised, national
versions of the booklets were created using the national clusters. All booklets were checked on-
screen as well as on the printed version. Experience has shown that problems with graphics in
particular, often become apparent only once they are printed.
125. After the Word versions of the booklets were finalised, the booklets were converted
to PDF. The PDF versions of the booklets were printed and compared to the Word versions to
ensure that no errors were introduced during the conversion process.
Additional adaptations to United States and Canadian booklets
126. Source booklets were constructed on A4 size paper. United States and Canadian
booklets needed to be adapted to be printable on Letter size paper. Margins, footers and headers
were adjusted to ensure that the units would fit onto Letter sized paper without affecting the unit
layout.
Pilot trial questionnaire construction
127. The student and school questionnaires for the pilot trial were constructed using the
past PISA questionnaires. The OECD specified the questions that should be included, drawing
on source versions from PISA 2003–2009. Items included in the pilot trial instruments are listed
below.
Source questionnaires
Student questionnaire
SECTION 1: ABOUT YOU
2009-ST01: Grade level
2009-ST02: Study programme
2009-ST03: Age
2009-ST04: Gender
2009-ST05: Pre-primary education attendance
2009-ST06: Starting age for primary education
2009-ST07: Grade repetition
SECTION 2: YOUR FAMILY AND HOME [WITH INTRO TEXT]
2009-ST08: Family structure
2009-ST09: Mother’s main job
2009-ST10: Mother’s education
2009-ST11: Mother’s qualifications
2009-ST12: Mother’s employment status
2009-ST13: Father’s main job
2009-ST14: Father’s education
2009-ST15: Father’s qualifications
2009-ST16: Father’s employment status
2009-ST17: Country of birth for student and parents
2009-ST18: Age at arrival in country of test
2009-ST19: Language spoken at home
2009-ST20: Home resources
2009-ST21: Family wealth
2009-ST22: Books in home
38
SECTION 3: YOUR READING ACTIVITIES [WITH INTRO TEXT]
2009-ST23: Time spent reading for enjoyment
2009-ST24: Enjoyment of reading
2009-ST25: Materials students read for enjoyment
SECTION 4: LEARNING TIME
2009-ST28: Minutes in a class period
2009-ST29: Number of class periods in each subject
2009-ST30: Number of class periods in total
2012-ST55: Hours typically spent out-of-school-time lessons
SECTION 5: YOUR SCHOOL
2012-ST88: Attitude towards school
2012-ST86: Student-teacher relations
SECTION 6: YOUR SCHOOL LESSONS AND SUBJECTS
2009-ST35: Number of students in test language class
2009-ST36: Disciplinary climate in test language lessons
2012-ST81: Disciplinary climate in mathematics lessons
2006-ST36: Importance of doing well in science, mathematics and test language subjects
SECTION 7: YOUR STRATEGIES IN READING AND UNDERSTANDING TEXTS [WITH
INTRO TEXT]
2009-ST41: Metacognition strategies in reading: Understanding and remembering
2009-ST42: Metacognition strategies in reading: Summarising
SECTION 8: YOUR VIEWS ON <BROAD SCIENCE> [WITH INTRO TEXT]
2006-ST16: Enjoyment of science
2006-ST17: Self-efficacy in science
SECTION 9: CAREERS AND <BROAD SCIENCE> [WITH INTRO TEXT]
2006-ST27: School preparation for science-related careers
2006-ST28: Student information on science-related careers
2006-ST29: Future-oriented motivation to learn science
2006-ST35: Instrumental motivation to learn science
SECTION 10: YOUR MATHEMATICS EXPERIENCES
2003-ST30: Interest in, enjoyment of and instrumental motivation in mathematics
2003-ST31: Self-efficacy in mathematics
2003-ST32: Anxiety and self-concept in mathematics
2012-ST77: Teacher support in mathematics lessons
39
School questionnaire
SECTION A: THE STRUCTURE AND ORGANISATION OF THE SCHOOL
2009-SC02: Public or Private
2009-SC03: Funding
2009-SC04: Community
2009-SC05: Schooling
2012-SC23: Students leaving without certificate
2012-SC39: Quality assurance/improvement
SECTION B: THE STUDENT AND TEACHER BODY
2009-SC06: Enrolment
2009-SC07: Grade repetition
2009-SC08: English as second language
2009-SC09: Teaching staff
SECTION C: THE SCHOOL’S RESOURCES
2009-SC10Q01: Number students in grade
2009-SC10Q02: Computers available
2009-SC10Q03: Internet connected
2009-SC11: School capacity hindered
Remove 2009-SC11Q05 and SC11Q06 (library staff and support personal)
Include 2012-SC14Q11 to 2012-SC14Q13 (k to m on infrastructure)
SECTION D: SCHOOL INSTRUCTION, CURRICULUM AND ASSESSMENT
2009-SC12: Ability grouping
2009-SC13: Extracurricular activities
2009-SC14: Activities offered for English-language learners
2012-SC20: Extra mathematics lessons offered
2012-SC21: Purpose of additional mathematics
2009-SC15: Assessment methods
2009-SC16: Purposes of assessment
SECTION E: SCHOOL CLIMATE
2009-SC17: Teacher and student factors hindering school climate
2009-SC18: Parental expectations
SECTION F: SCHOOL POLICIES AND PRACTICES
2009-SC19: Admissions selection
2009-SC20: Transfer of students
2009-SC21: Accountability to parents
2009-SC22: Uses of achievement data
2009-SC23: Monitoring teacher practices
2009-SC24: School responsibilities
2009-SC26: School leadership
2012-SC35: Professional development in mathematics
40
SECTION G: PILOT ADMINISTRATION FEEDBACK
2012-SC50: Pilot Administration Feedback
National questionnaires
128. National versions of the questions were collected from the archived national
materials submitted in past PISA cycles. For questions from PISA 2012, adaptations were based
on the final versions of the PISA 2012 main survey Questionnaire Adaptation Spreadsheets
(QAS) or the PISA 2012 field trial materials in the case of the United Kingdom (excl. Scotland),
for which the main survey adaptations had not yet been finalised.
129. Not all questions were administered by the countries in past cycles. In the cases
where a country did not administer a question in PISA, that question was also removed from the
pilot trial questionnaires.
130. The United States added several national questions to the pilot trial school and
student questionnaires which are routinely added to PISA questionnaires:
USA-2009-ST05: Student is Hispanic or Latino
USA-2009-ST06: Student’s race
USA-2009-ST08: Enrolment in kindergarten
USA-2009-ST10 (sub-question): Grade repetition in kindergarten - sub-question in
international-2009-ST07
USA-2009-ST11: Highest level of school the student expects to complete
USA-2009-SC27: Percentage of students eligible for free- or reduced-price lunch.
Preparation of Manuals
131. Manuals were created to explain the correct procedures with a view to making the
implementation of the pilot study consistent with the implementation of assessments during the
normal PISA cycles. The following manuals were created:
Procedures Manual
School Coordinator’s Manual
Test Administrator’s Manual
132. These PISA-Based Test for Schools manuals were based on procedures being
undertaken for the PISA 2012 survey.
The Procedures Manual
133. The manual is aimed at the main organisers of the PISA-Based Test for Schools and
provides an overview of the procedures to be followed for the implementation of the pilot trial
assessment for the PISA-Based Test for Schools. It provides a brief overview of the rationale
and design of PISA and discusses the evolution of the PISA-Based Test for Schools project.
134. It also provides a description of the main resources needed to implement the test
such as test administrators, school coordinators, coders and a chronological guide as to when
certain activities should be undertaken.
The School Coordinator’s Manual
135. The manual is aimed at the coordinators in those schools that are taking part in the
pilot trial. The manual describes the tasks which should be undertaken by the School
Coordinators before the assessment, during the assessment and after the assessment. The School
Coordinator is the key person who will organise the time and place for the assessment and
notify students and teachers of what is happening. The School Coordinator is the liaison
between the organisers and the participating school.
41
The Test Administrator’s Manual
136. This manual is based very closely on the manual of the same name that was written
for the implementation of the PISA 2012 survey. This was done to ensure that the PISA-Based
Test for Schools is administered in exactly the same way to help maintain comparability
between the two assessments. The Test Administrator’s Manual describes in detail the tasks to
be done before the assessment and the procedures to be followed during the administration of
the assessment, including the exact script that must be read to the students before they start the
assessment. The manual stresses the need for consistent application of the existing set of
procedures used in PISA.
137. The manual also stresses the need for excellent communication between the Test
Administrator and the School Coordinator.
42
Chapter 5: Equating Methods and Results
138. The PISA Based Test for Schools (PBT) data consisted of two phases. The first
phase had PISA link items and new PBT items in an hour-long test of two clusters per booklet.
The test was balanced in that all items appeared in both the first and last half of the test. The
second phase included only PBT items, but some of these also occurred in the first Phase. It was
therefore possible to link together the data into one data matrix through these common items.
139. In this chapter, we report on the psychometric characteristics of the final selection
of items for the pilot trial, totalling 90 minutes of testing time for each domain. Some items
were discarded from the field trial and equating sets because of psychometric problems such as
excessive DIF or poor discrimination. Also some parts of complex multiple-choice items were
found to perform poorly and were omitted, and some partial credit items were collapsed if there
was insufficient differentiation between student abilities on some categories or when an
intermediate category was answered by very few students. To ensure sufficient coverage of
framework areas, some items with good psychometric properties were deleted in favour of items
with inferior psychometric properties, though this did not extend to retaining items with clearly
poor properties. Finally, some high-quality items were set aside because they were excess to
requirements.
140. The table below gives the original number and selected number of items. These
numbers exclude the PISA link items.
Table 42 Numbers of items in original FT-ES pool and in pilot trial selection
Domain Original Pool Selected
Mathematics 75 40
Reading 100 46
Science 114 54
141. The mathematics and science items were put on the current PISA scale (2003 and
2006 respectively) by anchoring the PISA link items at their 2003 and 2006 item parameters.
The reading items were mapped on to the 2000 scale by adjusting the PISA 2009 item
parameters by a linear transformation to the PISA 2000 scale. Details are given below.
142. It was noted that when the three domains were scaled without anchoring, the mean
difficulties of the PISA link items were lower for all three domains for the equating study than
the means for the original PISA items. It was suspected that at least some of this effect was due
to the PISA item parameters being estimated from a two-hour test, with the effect of low
response in particularly the fourth cluster (the last half hour) driving up the estimated
difficulties. When the PISA parameters were re-estimated over the first two clusters only,
effectively replicating the items’ behaviour in an hour-long test as was the Equating study, the
following mean decreases in item difficulties were observed:
Table 43 Reduction in mean item difficulty for one-hour PISA re-estimation
Domain Reduction
Mathematics 0.152
Reading 0.182
Science 0.108
43
143. These corrections were subtracted from the PISA mathematics 2003 and PISA
science 2006 difficulties to give the final link anchors. For reading, the PISA 2009 reading
items were transformed to the PISA 2000 logit scale using
PISA2000L=.883*(PISA2009L+0.85-0.12)+.0552
144. This is based on the transformation for missing gender for achievement scores.
145. The .182 correction was then subtracted from the transformed difficulties.
146. The transformations to put the PBT item parameters obtained from these equating
runs on the PISA point scales are:
Mathematics: PISA2003=100*(PISA2003L+0.1344)/1.2838+500
Reading: PISA2000=100*(PISA2000L-0.5076)/1.1002+500
Science: PISA2006=100*(PISA2006L-0.1797)/1.0724+500
147. Equating errors for the scales were calculated as in PISA 2009, using the link item
parameters from the scaling without anchoring compared to the PISA items. This gave equating
errors of 3.99 for mathematics, 5.94 for reading and 5.97 for science. These are higher in
general than the PISA equating errors, particularly for mathematics, and reflect the smaller data
set on which the equating is based.
148. Item statistics (Itanals) from the final equating run are provided for the selected
pilot trial set of items in Appendix 5, excluding the PISA link items. Table 44 gives the items
and the corresponding number in the files. The PISA link items are indicated with a yellow
background.
44
Table 44 Final Selected Items for Pilot Study
Mathematics Reading Science
1 PM033Q01 1 PR220Q01 1 PS256Q01
2 PM034Q01 2 PR220Q02B 2 PS408Q01
3 PM192Q01T 3 PR220Q04 3 PS408Q03
4 PM411Q01 4 PR404Q03 4 PS408Q04T
5 PM411Q02 5 PR404Q06 5 PS413Q04T
6 PM421Q01 6 PR404Q07T 6 PS413Q05
7 PM421Q02T 7 PR404Q10A 7 PS413Q06
8 PM421Q03 8 PR404Q10B 8 PS425Q02
9 PM462Q01D 9 PR412Q01 9 PS425Q03
10 PM571Q01 10 PR412Q05 10 PS425Q04
11 PM603Q01T 11 PR412Q06T 11 PS425Q05
12 PM603Q02 12 PR412Q08 12 PS428Q01
13 PM828Q01 13 PR424Q02T 13 PS428Q03
14 PM828Q02 14 PR424Q03 14 PS428Q05
15 PM828Q03 15 PR424Q07 15 PS498Q02T
16 PM833Q01T 16 PR437Q01 16 PS498Q03
17 PM5002Q01 17 PR437Q06 17 PS498Q04
18 PM5002Q02 18 PR437Q07 18 PS527Q01T
19 PM5008Q01 19 PR455Q02 19 PS527Q03T
20 PM5010Q01T 20 PR455Q03 20 PS527Q04T
21 PM5010Q02 21 PR455Q04 21 PS7000Q01
22 PM5013Q01 22 PR455Q05T 22 PS7000Q02T
23 PM5013Q03 23 PR456Q01 23 PS7002Q03
24 PM5015Q02 24 PR456Q02 24 PS7002Q04
25 PM5017Q02 25 PR456Q06 25 PS7012Q01
26 PM5017Q03 26 PR466Q02 26 PS7012Q03
27 PM5020Q02 27 PR466Q03T 27 PS7012Q04T
28 PM5021Q01T 28 PR466Q06 28 PS7013Q01
29 PM5021Q02 29 PR6002Q01 29 PS7013Q02
30 PM5026Q01 30 PR6002Q02T 30 PS7014Q01
31 PM5101Q01 31 PR6002Q04 31 PS7014Q03
32 PM5101Q02 32 PR6002Q05 32 PS7017Q01
33 PM5102Q01 33 PR6004Q01 33 PS7017Q04D
34 PM5104Q01 34 PR6004Q05B 34 PS7018Q03
35 PM5107Q01 35 PR6004Q06 35 PS7018Q04T
36 PM5107Q02 36 PR6008Q02 36 PS7020Q03
45
Mathematics Reading Science
37 PM5109Q01 37 PR6008Q04 37 PS7020Q04
38 PM5109Q02 38 PR6008Q05 38 PS7021Q02T
39 PM5110Q01 39 PR6010Q01 39 PS7021Q04T
40 PM5110Q02 40 PR6010Q03 40 PS7201Q01
41 PM5124Q01 41 PR6010Q06 41 PS7201Q02
42 PM5124Q02 42 PR6010Q07 42 PS7201Q03
43 PM5124Q03 43 PR6011Q03 43 PS7205Q02
44 PM5142Q01 44 PR6011Q05 44 PS7208Q01
45 PM5142Q02 45 PR6011Q07 45 PS7208Q02
46 PM5145Q01 46 PR6013Q03 46 PS7211Q01
47 PM5163Q01 47 PR6013Q04 47 PS7211Q02T
48 PM5169Q01 48 PR6013Q06 48 PS7212Q01
49 PM5169Q02 49 PR6013Q08 49 PS7212Q02
50 PM5181Q02 50 PR6014Q03 50 PS7212Q04
51 PM5183Q01 51 PR6014Q06T 51 PS7215Q02
52 PM5183Q02 52 PR6014Q07 52 PS7215Q03
53 PM5185Q01 53 PR6015Q01 53 PS7216Q01
54 PM5185Q02T 54 PR6015Q03 54 PS7216Q03
55 PM5187Q01 55 PR6015Q04 55 PS7217Q01T
56 PM5188Q01 56 PR6015Q06 56 PS7217Q02
57 PR6017Q04 57 PS7220Q01
58 PR6017Q05T 58 PS7220Q02T
59 PR6017Q08 59 PS7220Q03
60 PR6017Q10 60 PS7221Q01
61 PR6017Q11 61 PS7221Q02
62 PR6018Q01T 62 PS7221Q03T
63 PR6018Q03 63 PS7221Q04
64 PR6018Q08 64 PS7222Q01
65 PR6018Q09 65 PS7222Q02T
66 PR6023Q01 66 PS7222Q03T
67 PR6023Q06 67 PS7224Q02T
68 PR6023Q07 68 PS7228Q02
69 PR6023Q08 69 PS7228Q03
70 PR6026Q02T 70 PS7228Q04
71 PR6026Q05T 71 PS7230Q02T
72 PR6027Q01T 72 PS7230Q03T
73 PR6027Q04 73 PS7231Q01T
46
Mathematics Reading Science
74 PR6027Q10 74 PS7231Q04T
Differential Item Functioning by Gender
149. Within the context of Rasch modelling, an item was deemed to exhibit differential
item functioning (DIF) if the response probabilities for that item could not be fully explained by
the ability of the student and a fixed set of difficulty parameters for that item.
150. In DIF analysis the aim was not to find items that have a higher or a lower p-value
for one group than another – since this may result from genuine differences in the proficiency
levels of the two groups. Rather the aim was to identify items that appear to be too difficult or
too easy, after controlling for differences in the average proficiency in the two groups. In the
PBT equating study gender and country DIF were explored. Country DIF is described in the
next section, as the larger number of groups requires a different reporting method than gender
DIF. The DIF analysis was performed using the multi-facet model of ACER ConQuest2. For
gender DIF, an item-by-gender interaction term was added to the standard scaling model.
151. The index of gender DIF was the difference between the estimated item difficulties
by group of interest (gender) adjusted for differences in overall performance between the groups
on all the items. In other words, an item shows gender DIF if boys of the same ability as girls
have different probabilities in responding correctly to this item.
152. Table 45 to Table 47 show the tabular report for gender DIF of mathematics,
reading and science for all the new PBT items, including those not selected. This table presents
the DIF parameters for the girls. The values for the boys are -1 * the parameters for the girls.
Therefore, the difference between the estimates for the girls and the boys is the same as 2 * the
parameters for the girls. DIF values of > 0.20 or < -0.20 are taken to indicate the existence of
DIF and are in bold. A positive value indicates that the item was harder for girls than for boys
having the same ability, a negative value indicates that it was easier for girls than for boys of
matched ability. ICC graphs by Gender are provided in Appendix 4 for the selected items to
illustrate the differences. The item numbers in Appendix 4 match those in Table 44.
2 Adams, R. J., Wu, M. L., & Wilson, M. R. (2012). ACER ConQuest Version 3: Generalised
item response modelling software [computer program]. Camberwell: Australian Council for
Educational Research.
47
Table 45: Gender DIF table for Mathematics
Item ID DIF Item ID DIF Item ID DIF
PM5002Q01 -0.191 PM5021Q01T -0.221 PM5140Q02 0.104
PM5002Q02 -0.21 PM5021Q02 0.172 PM5140Q03 0.277
PM5002Q03D -0.055 PM5022Q01 -0.083 PM5142Q01 0.143
PM5002Q04D -0.046 PM5022Q02D 0.169 PM5142Q02 -0.019
PM5004Q01 -0.143 PM5023Q01 -0.077 PM5145Q01 -0.105
PM5004Q02D 0.112 PM5023Q02 -0.026 PM5145Q02 -0.115
PM5006Q01 -0.002 PM5026Q01 0.191 PM5146Q01 0.04
PM5006Q02D -0.052 PM5101Q01 0.034 PM5146Q02 0.132
PM5007Q01 -0.122 PM5101Q02 -0.207 PM5160Q01 -0.098
PM5007Q02D -0.031 PM5102Q01 0.174 PM5163Q01 -0.158
PM5008Q01 -0.03 PM5104Q01 -0.022 PM5169Q01 0.172
PM5008Q02D 0.034 PM5104Q02 -0.246 PM5169Q02 0.151
PM5010Q01T 0.015 PM5106Q01 0.222 PM5181Q01 0.033
PM5010Q02 0.14 PM5106Q02 0.189 PM5181Q02 -0.03
PM5013Q01 0.045 PM5107Q01 -0.183 PM5183Q01 -0.006
PM5013Q02 0.104 PM5107Q02 0.112 PM5183Q02 0.003
PM5013Q03 -0.184 PM5109Q01 -0.112 PM5185Q01 -0.059
PM5015Q01D 0.059 PM5109Q02 0.075 PM5185Q02T 0.031
PM5015Q02 -0.108 PM5110Q01 0.067 PM5186Q03T 0.314
PM5017Q01 0.057 PM5110Q02 -0.108 PM5187Q01 0.261
PM5017Q02 0.074 PM5121Q01 -0.053 PM5187Q02 0.096
PM5017Q03 0.111 PM5124Q01 -0.093 PM5188Q01 -0.254
PM5020Q01 0.117 PM5124Q02 0.208 PM5188Q02 -0.007
PM5020Q02 0.018 PM5124Q03 -0.014 PM5189Q01 -0.157
PM5020Q03 0.185 PM5140Q01 -0.505 PM5189Q02 0.117
48
Table 46: Gender DIF table for Reading
Item ID DIF Item ID DIF Item ID DIF
PR6002Q01 -0.229 PR6013Q04 -0.103 PR6022Q01 -0.051
PR6002Q02T -0.229 PR6013Q05 0.292 PR6022Q03 -0.095
PR6002Q04 -0.063 PR6013Q06 -0.108 PR6022Q07 -0.077
PR6002Q05 -0.086 PR6013Q08 0.164 PR6022Q08 -0.141
PR6003Q01 -0.162 PR6014Q01 0.067 PR6022Q09 0.068
PR6003Q02 0.153 PR6014Q03 -0.154 PR6023Q01 0.081
PR6003Q04 0.059 PR6014Q06T -0.098 PR6023Q03 -0.094
PR6003Q05 0.226 PR6014Q07 0.021 PR6023Q06 0.063
PR6004Q01 -0.187 PR6015Q01 -0.079 PR6023Q07 0.172
PR6004Q02B -0.096 PR6015Q03 -0.1 PR6023Q08 0.168
PR6004Q03 -0.161 PR6015Q04 -0.139 PR6024Q01 -0.003
PR6004Q05B 0.25 PR6015Q06 -0.407 PR6024Q02 0.064
PR6004Q06 0.084 PR6015Q07 -0.122 PR6024Q04 -0.244
PR6006Q01 0.044 PR6017Q04 0.148 PR6024Q05 -0.24
PR6006Q02 0.077 PR6017Q05T 0.004 PR6024Q06 0.112
PR6006Q05B -0.186 PR6017Q08 0.132 PR6024Q10 -0.066
PR6008Q02 0.19 PR6017Q10 -0.003 PR6025Q01 0.045
PR6008Q03 -0.2 PR6017Q11 -0.069 PR6025Q05 -0.137
PR6008Q04 0.086 PR6018Q01T 0.114 PR6025Q07 0.235
PR6008Q05 -0.067 PR6018Q03 -0.139 PR6025Q08 0.086
PR6008Q06 -0.037 PR6018Q04T -0.066 PR6025Q10 -0.125
PR6010Q01 0.048 PR6018Q06 0.079 PR6026Q02T -0.127
PR6010Q03 0.083 PR6018Q08 -0.041 PR6026Q03 0.246
PR6010Q04 -0.007 PR6018Q09 -0.066 PR6026Q05T 0.28
PR6010Q06 -0.157 PR6019Q02 -0.071 PR6026Q09 -0.123
PR6010Q07 0.248 PR6019Q05 0.275 PR6027Q01T -0.194
PR6011Q01 0.136 PR6019Q07 -0.139 PR6027Q03T -0.198
PR6011Q03 0.015 PR6019Q08 0.01 PR6027Q04 0.195
PR6011Q05 -0.042 PR6019Q09 -0.136 PR6027Q06 0.12
PR6011Q06 0.142 PR6020Q02T 0.028 PR6027Q07 0.118
PR6011Q07 0.277 PR6020Q04 -0.046 PR6027Q10 -0.014
49
Item ID DIF Item ID DIF Item ID DIF
PR6013Q01 -0.053 PR6020Q07 0.014
PR6013Q03 0.254 PR6020Q09 0.19
50
Table 47: Gender DIF table for Science
Item ID DIF Item ID DIF Item ID DIF
PS7000Q01 -0.098 PS7211Q02T -0.271 PS7015Q01T 0.277
PS7000Q02T 0.059 PS7211Q04 -0.162 PS7015Q04 -0.178
PS7000Q04 -0.073 PS7212Q01 -0.193 PS7017Q03 0.114
PS7000Q05 0.296 PS7212Q04 0.149 PS7017Q05T 0.086
PS7002Q03 -0.114 PS7215Q02 0.018 PS7019Q01 0.121
PS7002Q04 -0.047 PS7215Q03 -0.038 PS7019Q02 -0.041
PS7006Q01 -0.117 PS7216Q01 0.051 PS7022Q01T 0.272
PS7006Q02 -0.007 PS7216Q03 -0.112 PS7022Q02D 0.012
PS7008Q01 -0.164 PS7217Q01T 0.03 PS7023Q01T 0.197
PS7008Q02 -0.03 PS7217Q02 0.104 PS7023Q02T 0.091
PS7008Q03 -0.042 PS7217Q03T 0.215 PS7203Q01 -0.239
PS7008Q05 -0.166 PS7218Q02 -0.028 PS7203Q03T 0.019
PS7012Q01 -0.099 PS7218Q03 -0.151 PS7203Q05 0.045
PS7012Q02T 0.05 PS7220Q01 -0.091 PS7205Q03 0.052
PS7012Q03 0.099 PS7220Q02T 0.283 PS7209Q01 0.027
PS7012Q04T 0.251 PS7220Q03 0.101 PS7212Q02 0.055
PS7013Q01 0.073 PS7221Q01 0.217 PS7215Q01 0.15
PS7013Q02 0.066 PS7221Q02 0.027 PS7216Q02T 0.105
PS7014Q01 -0.091 PS7221Q03T 0.322 PS7218Q01T -0.069
PS7014Q03 0.032 PS7221Q04 -0.176 PS7219Q01 -0.053
PS7014Q04 0.172 PS7222Q01 -0.104 PS7219Q02T -0.026
PS7015Q02 -0.192 PS7222Q02T 0.276 PS7219Q03T -0.014
PS7015Q03T 0.057 PS7222Q03T 0.027 PS7219Q04 -0.099
PS7017Q01 0.112 PS7224Q01 -0.004 PS7222Q04T 0.212
PS7017Q04D -0.125 PS7224Q02T -0.309 PS7224Q03 -0.103
PS7018Q03 -0.133 PS7228Q02 -0.243 PS7224Q05 -0.047
PS7018Q04T -0.303 PS7228Q03 -0.281 PS7228Q01 -0.025
PS7020Q03 -0.017 PS7228Q04 0.07 PS7229Q01 -0.118
PS7020Q04 0.005 PS7230Q02T -0.037 PS7229Q02 0.086
PS7021Q02T -0.058 PS7230Q03T 0.05 PS7229Q03T 0.226
PS7021Q04T 0.11 PS7230Q04T 0.167
51
Item ID DIF Item ID DIF Item ID DIF
PS7201Q01 0.093 PS7231Q01T 0.142
PS7201Q02 -0.042 PS7231Q04T 0.167
PS7201Q03 0.019 PS7002Q02T 0.414
PS7205Q02 -0.067 PS7004Q01 0.234
PS7205Q04 -0.402 PS7006Q03 0.045
PS7208Q01 -0.025 PS7009Q01 -0.305
PS7208Q02 -0.082 PS7009Q02T -0.067
PS7208Q03 -0.044 PS7009Q03 0.034
PS7209Q02 -0.358 PS7009Q04 -0.211
PS7209Q03 -0.483 PS7010Q02T 0.05
PS7211Q01 0.264 PS7010Q04 0.076
Item-by-country Interaction (Country DIF)
153. After allowing for the effect of multiple comparisons for comparing country item
parameters against each other, using similar methods as for PISA, items were flagged for
Country DIF if the ratio of the item parameter to the standard error was greater than 5. We show
here only those items that were flagged for Country DIF under this criterion. The items where
DIF was flagged for a country are indicated in bold. Of these items, two were retained in the
pilot trial instrument, PS7012Q01 and PS7221Q02, coverage and otherwise good psychometric
properties being judged more important than large Country DIF.
Table 48: Items exhibiting Country DIF
Phase 1 Items
Item AUS GBR IRL USA
Dif Dif SE Dif Dif SE Dif Dif SE Dif Dif SE
PM5002Q04D 0.838 0.156 -0.415 0.159 -0.357 0.144 -0.065 0.15
PR6008Q03 -0.491 0.222 0.095 0.214 1.017 0.201 -0.62 0.207
PS7012Q01 0.213 0.211 0.996 0.258 -0.951 0.185 -0.258 0.192
Phase 2 Items
AUS GBR IRL USA
Dif Dif SE Dif Dif SE Dif Dif SE Dif Dif SE
PS7205Q04 -1.524 0.25 0.486 0.202 0.31 0.186 0.728 0.194
PS7211Q04 0.184 0.19 -0.445 0.196 -0.761 0.185 1.022 0.198
PS7221Q02 0.693 0.139 -0.701 0.139 0.172 0.126 -0.164 0.131
52
Test Targeting
154. Uni-dimensional scaling with ACER ConQuest was used to illustrate the
distribution of students and items for the equating runs. In Figure 1 to Figure 3 the student
ability distribution is displayed by ‘X’ on the left side of the picture and the item thresholds are
displayed by the item number on the right, with the upper and lower thresholds for 0,1,2 partial
credit items indicated by .1 and .2. The number of students represented by each ‘X’ is
indicated. The PISA link items are indicated in red. There is in general a fair spread of items,
though some parts of the range are a little under-represented, such as the range between -1
and .-2 in science.
53
Figure 1: Mathematics item difficulty and student achievement distributions
54
Figure 2: Reading item difficulty and student achievement distributions
55
Figure 3: Science item difficulty and student achievement distributions
56
155. Note that these maps are calculated using the convention that a student with an
ability at the level of the item would have a 50% chance of answering that question correctly.
For the definition of proficiency levels, it was decided in PISA 2000 that a student in the middle
of a level would correctly answer an item of average difficulty for that level with probability
62.5%, which would imply that the student would answer questions at the bottom of the level
about 80% percent of the time, and those at the top about 50% of the time. We adopt this policy
here as well, and the items’ positions on the PISA scales reflect this. A full discussion of this
issue is given in the PISA 2000 Technical Report.
156. Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6 show the distribution of items in the pilot trial set
for each domain, mapped onto the described proficiency scales for mathematics, reading and
science respectively that are used for reporting PISA main surveys. In these figures, the scale
scores of the items are used, as provided in Appendix 5 in the column “Thresholds”.
57
Mathematics
Level Lower score limit
Number of score points at level
Characteristics of tasks
6 669 20
At Level 6 students can conceptualise, generalise and utilise information based on their investigations and modelling of complex problem situations. They can link different information sources and representations and flexibly translate between them. Students at this level are capable of advanced mathematical thinking and reasoning. These students can apply this insight and understanding along with a mastery of symbolic and formal mathematical operations and relationships to develop new approaches and strategies for attacking novel situations. Students at this level can formulate and precisely communicate their actions and reflections regarding their findings, interpretations, arguments, and the appropriateness of these to the original situations.
5 607 8
At Level 5 students can develop and work with models for complex situations, identifying constraints and specifying assumptions. They can select, compare, and evaluate appropriate problem-solving strategies for dealing with complex problems related to these models. Students at this level can work strategically using broad, well-developed thinking and reasoning skills, appropriately linked representations, symbolic and formal characterisations, and insight pertaining to these situations. They can reflect on their actions and formulate and communicate their interpretations and reasoning.
4 545 8
At Level 4 students can work effectively with explicit models for complex concrete situations that may involve constraints or call for making assumptions. They can select and integrate different representations, including symbolic representations, linking them directly to aspects of real-world situations. Students at this level can utilise well-developed skills and reason flexibly, with some insight, in these contexts. They can construct and communicate explanations and arguments based on their interpretations, arguments and actions.
3 482 7
At Level 3 students can execute clearly described procedures, including those that require sequential decisions. They can select and apply simple problem-solving strategies. Students at this level can interpret and use representations based on different information sources and reason directly from them. They can develop short communications reporting their interpretations, results and reasoning.
2 420 1
At Level 2 students can interpret and recognise situations in contexts that require no more than direct inference. They can extract relevant information from a single source and make use of a single representational mode. Students at this level can employ basic algorithms, formulae, procedures, or conventions. They are capable of direct reasoning and literal interpretations of the results.
1 358 1
At Level 1 students can answer questions involving familiar contexts where all relevant information is present and the questions are clearly defined. They are able to identify information and to carry out routine procedures according to direct instructions in explicit situations. They can perform actions that are obvious and follow immediately from the given stimuli.
Below Level 1
<358
1
(PM5185Q01 threshold at 331.35)
Figure 4: Summary descriptions for the six levels of proficiency in maths and the number
of score points at each level in the pilot trial instrument
58
Reading
Level Lower score limit
Number of score points at level
Characteristics of tasks
6 698 3
Tasks at this level typically require the reader to make multiple inferences, comparisons and contrasts that are both detailed and precise. They require demonstration of a full and detailed understanding of one or more texts and may involve integrating information from more than one text. Tasks may require the reader to deal with unfamiliar ideas, in the presence of prominent competing information, and to generate abstract categories for interpretations. Reflect and evaluate tasks may require the reader to hypothesise about or critically evaluate a complex text on an unfamiliar topic, taking into account multiple criteria or perspectives, and applying sophisticated understandings from beyond the text. A salient condition for access and retrieve tasks at this level is precision of analysis and fine attention to detail that is inconspicuous in the texts.
5 626 4
Tasks at this level that involve retrieving information require the reader to locate and organise several pieces of deeply embedded information, inferring which information in the text is relevant. Reflective tasks require critical evaluation or hypothesis, drawing on specialised knowledge. Both interpretative and reflective tasks require a full and detailed understanding of a text whose content or form is unfamiliar. For all aspects of reading, tasks at this level typically involve dealing with concepts that are contrary to expectations.
4 553 8
Tasks at this level that involve retrieving information require the reader to locate and organise several pieces of embedded information. Some tasks at this level require interpreting the meaning of nuances of language in a section of text by taking into account the text as a whole. Other interpretative tasks require understanding and applying categories in an unfamiliar context. Reflective tasks at this level require readers to use formal or public knowledge to hypothesise about or critically evaluate a text. Readers must demonstrate an accurate understanding of long or complex texts whose content or form may be unfamiliar.
3 480 14
Tasks at this level require the reader to locate, and in some cases recognise the relationship between, several pieces of information that must meet multiple conditions. Interpretative tasks at this level require the reader to integrate several parts of a text in order to identify a main idea, understand a relationship or construe the meaning of a word or phrase. They need to take into account many features in comparing, contrasting or categorising. Often the required information is not prominent or there is much competing information; or there are other obstacles in the text, such as ideas that are contrary to expectation or negatively worded. Reflective tasks at this level may require connections, comparisons, and explanations, or they may require the reader to evaluate a feature of the text. Some reflective tasks require readers to demonstrate a fine understanding of the text in relation to familiar, everyday knowledge. Other tasks do not require detailed text comprehension but require the reader to draw on less common knowledge.
2 407 10
Some tasks at this level require the reader to locate one or more pieces of information, which may need to be inferred and may need to meet several conditions. Others require recognising the main idea in a text, understanding relationships, or construing meaning within a limited part of the text when the information is not prominent and the reader must make low level inferences. Tasks at this level may involve comparisons or contrasts based on a single feature in the text. Typical reflective tasks at this level require readers to make a comparison or several connections between the text and outside knowledge, by drawing on personal experience and attitudes.
1a 335 8
Tasks at this level require the reader: to locate one or more independent pieces of explicitly stated information; to recognise the main theme or author’s purpose in a text about a familiar topic; or to make a simple connection between information in the text and common, everyday knowledge. Typically the required information in the text is prominent and there is little, if any, competing information. The reader is explicitly directed to consider relevant factors in the task and in the text.
1b 262 2
Tasks at this level require the reader to locate a single piece of explicitly stated information in a prominent position in a short, syntactically simple text with a familiar context and text type, such as a narrative or a simple list. The text typically provides support to the reader, such as repetition of information, pictures or familiar symbols. There is minimal competing information. In tasks requiring interpretation the reader may need to make simple connections between adjacent pieces of information.
Figure 5: Summary descriptions for the seven levels of proficiency in reading and the
number of score points at each level in the pilot trial instrument
59
Science
Level Lower score limit
Number of score points at level
Characteristics of tasks
6 708 3
At Level 6, students can consistently identify, explain and apply scientific knowledge and knowledge about science in a variety of complex life situations. They can link different information sources and explanations and use evidence from those sources to justify decisions. They clearly and consistently demonstrate advanced scientific thinking and reasoning, and they demonstrate willingness to use their scientific understanding in support of solutions to unfamiliar scientific and technological situations. Students at this level can use scientific knowledge and develop arguments in support of recommendations and decisions that centre on personal, social or global situations.
5 633 10
At Level 5, students can identify the scientific components of many complex life situations, apply both scientific concepts and knowledge about science to these situations, and can compare, select and evaluate appropriate scientific evidence for responding to life situations. Students at this level can use well-developed inquiry abilities, link knowledge appropriately and bring critical insights to situations. They can construct explanations based on evidence and arguments based on their critical analysis.
4 559 20
At Level 4, students can work effectively with situations and issues that may involve explicit phenomena requiring them to make inferences about the role of science or technology. They can select and integrate explanations from different disciplines of science or technology and link those explanations directly to aspects of life situations. Students at this level can reflect on their actions and they can communicate decisions using scientific knowledge and evidence.
3 484 14
At Level 3, students can identify clearly described scientific issues in a range of contexts. They can select facts and knowledge to explain phenomena and apply simple models or inquiry strategies. Students at this level can interpret and use scientific concepts from different disciplines and can apply them directly. They can develop short statements using facts and make decisions based on scientific knowledge.
2 409 9
At Level 2, students have adequate scientific knowledge to provide possible explanations in familiar contexts or draw conclusions based on simple investigations. They are capable of direct reasoning and making literal interpretations of the results of scientific inquiry or technological problem solving.
1 335 1 At Level 1, students have such a limited scientific knowledge that it can only be applied to a few, familiar situations. They can present scientific explanations that are obvious and follow explicitly from given evidence.
Below Level 1
<335 2
(PS7221Q01 threshold at 246.19 and PS7221Q04 threshold at 296.92)
Figure 6: Summary descriptions for the six levels of proficiency in science and the number
of score points at each level in the pilot trial instrument
60
Chapter 6: Proposal for replenishment of items
157. The contract for the development of the Phase 2 field trial and equating study for
the PISA-Based Test for Schools (PBT) calls for the development of “a proposal for the
replenishment of approximately 50% of the items after the first round of PISA for Schools and
during the initial three-year period. The proposal should consider how the item replenishment
process would maintain adequate and balanced PISA frameworks coverage, item difficulty
distributions, and all trends analysis.” (Contract M11/45, page 12)
158. Replenishment of items is needed to maintain the security of the test, to ensure that
the items in the PISA Based Test are of the highest technical quality, to ensure that the item
pool maintains currency, and possibly to increase the number of items in the item pool. At the
same time, a sufficient number of items should be retained after any replenishment to ensure
robust trend analysis and reporting.
159. We present three different scenarios which describe the possible replenishment of
items within the first three years of implementation of the PISA-Based Test for Schools as a live
assessment – starting late in 2012 after the completion of the pilot trial currently underway.
Scenario 1 – Replenish the item pool incrementally to continue with 90 minutes of
assessment time in each domain
160. In the first scenario the PBT remains as a test which assesses students for a
maximum of 90 minutes in each domain. Table 49 shows a possible design for this to be
achieved over a three year period from end of 2012 to the end of 2015.
Table 49 Item replenishment to replace 50% of the item pool incrementally
Original
Reading
Items
left
Total
New
Reading
items
Total
Reading
items
Original
Maths
Items
left
Total
New
Maths
items
Total
Maths
items
Original
Science
Items
left
Total
New
Science
items
Total
Science
items
Into pilot trial
47
47 40
40 54
54
Mid-2014 35 12 47 30 10 40 41 13 54
End of 2015
23 24 47 20 20 40 27 27 54
161. By mid-2014 it is proposed that there be 12 new items in reading, 10 new items in
mathematics and 13 new items in science.
162. At the end of 2015 it is proposed that there be an additional 12 new items in
reading, 10 new items in mathematics and 14 new items in science.
163. The cluster design of approximately 40 minutes would be retained with this scheme,
with the new items being introduced as replacements within the existing clusters.
164. In this way half of the original pilot trial items will have been replaced by the end of
2015 while retaining sufficient items to allow for a measure of change if a school opts to do the
test at different times.
165. An advantage of this scenario is that the booklet design would remain stable within
the program. A further advantage is that the choice of which items to replace will be
unconstrained in comparison with the second scenario. A disadvantage is that items can be
affected by “the company they keep”, so that changing the composition of clusters by including
61
new items and removing old ones may change the performance of the remaining items, upon
which trend measures will depend.
Scenario 2 – Replenish the item pool by replacing clusters, to continue with 90
minutes of assessment time in each domain
166. In the second scenario the PBT remains as a test which assesses students for a
maximum of 90 minutes in each domain. Unlike in Scenario 1, intact clusters are replaced. In
the current pilot trial test design there are two clusters each of mathematics, reading and science
items, and one mixed cluster including items from all three domains. Therefore, either three-
sevenths of the items would be replaced – a little less than 50% (one of each of the pure
mathematics, reading and science clusters); or four-sevenths of the items will be replaced – a
little more than 50% (one each of mathematics, reading and science, and the mixed cluster). In
either case, the replacement items would be introduced in one change-over. This could be at the
end of 2014 or the end of 2015. Table 50 shows one of the various possibilities: a four cluster
replacement at the end of 2014.
Table 50 Item replenishment to replace at least 50% of the item pool, by cluster
Original
Reading
Items
left
Total
New
Reading
items
Total
Reading
items
Original
Maths
Items
left
Total
New
Maths
items
Total
Maths
items
Original
Science
Items
left
Total
New
Science
items
Total
Science
items
Into pilot trial
47
47 40
40 54
54
End of 2014
20 27 47 17 23 40 23 31 54
167. Under this variation, at the end of 2014 it is proposed that there be 27 new items in
reading, 23 new items in mathematics and 31 new items in science.
168. The cluster design of approximately 40 minutes would be retained with this scheme,
with the new items being introduced as intact replacement clusters.
169. In the version of Scenario 2 shown in Table 50 more than half of the original pilot
trial items will have been replaced by the end of 2014 while retaining sufficient items to allow
for a measure of change if a school opts to do the test at different times.
170. An advantage of this scenario is that the booklet design would remain stable within
the program. A further advantage, in comparison with Scenario 1, is that any effects of item
replenishment would be minimised, since retained items, used for trend measurement, would be
in the same company as in the previous administrations. Conversely, the choice of which items
to replace will be constrained in comparison with Scenario 1, since the decision for Scenario 2
must be made on the basis of whole clusters.
Scenario 3 – Increase the item pool to allow 120 minute testing in each domain
171. The test design in the pilot trial includes just over 90 minutes testing in each of the
three domains of reading, mathematics and science. It is possible, even likely, that some schools
may wish to test in only one domain in a 120-minute assessment – the normal PISA test length.
This would allow the schools to have a greater degree of detail than is possible in the pilot trial,
and could also allow for consideration of subscale reporting.
172. It is proposed in this third scenario, therefore, to increase the number of items so
that 120 minutes of testing per domain is included in the item pool. This scenario also allows for
the replacement of 50% of the original items. Table 51 shows a possible design for this to be
achieved over a three year period from the end of 2012 to the end of 2015.
62
Table 51 Item replenishment to increase the item pool
Original
Reading
Items
left
Total
New
Reading
items
Total
Reading
items
Original
Maths
Items
left
Total
New
Maths
items
Total
Maths
items
Original
Science
Items
left
Total
New
Science
items
Total
Science
items
Into pilot trial
47
47 40
40 54
54
Mid-2014 38 23 61 32 20 52 44 26 70
End of 2015
23 38 61 20 32 52 27 43 70
173. It will be seen that there is an increase to 61 items for reading, 52 for mathematics
and 70 for science. It is proposed that this increase in items occur by mid-2014 so that a 120
minute test is available to schools for the beginning of the Northern Hemisphere school year
2014-5. This would require the creation of 23 new items in reading made up of 9 items to
replace items from the pilot trial and 14 items to increase the time to 120 minutes for reading. It
would require the creation of 20 new items in mathematics made up of 8 items to replace
unsuitable items from the pilot trial and 12 items to increase the time to 120 minutes for
mathematics. It would require the creation of 26 new items in science made up of 12 items to
replace items from the pilot trial and 17 items to increase the time to 120 minutes in science.
174. By the end of 2015, it is proposed to introduce an additional set of replenishment
items, to replace one per domain of the 30 minute clusters assembled in mid-2014. This would
involve including an additional 15 new reading items, 12 new mathematics items and 17 new
science items. Half of the original items from the pilot trial would still be retained in each
domain, as shown in the last row of Table 51.
175. In this way half of the original pilot trial items have been replaced and the number
in the item pool has increased to allow for a 120 minute test in a single domain. This will be
done while retaining sufficient items to allow for a measure of change if a school opts to do the
test at different times.
176. An advantage of Scenario 3 is that it will give schools more flexibility in choosing
whether to administer one or all domains; it will also allow for the possibility of reporting on
subscales, which would enhance the diagnostic potential of the assessment at the school, district
or regional level. It will also bring the PISA-Based Test for Schools closer to the PISA study in
its design.
177. Disadvantages of Scenario 3 are that it is expensive relative to Scenarios 1 and 2
(requiring more item development), and that there may be a disruption of trend in mid-2014
because of the change in booklet design.
Procedure for item creation and equating
178. The procedure adopted for PBT item development, modelled on PISA item
development, will be followed for the creation of all new items for the PBT. This means that
working back from the number of new items desired, four times the number of items will be
created in the first instance, followed by a refinement process including cognitive laboratory
methods to select half of those items.
179. These items will be placed into a field trial in a number of countries, similar to the
process followed for the field trial and equating studies which were implemented for the
creation of the original pilot trial instrument. The possibility of including secure PISA items in
this field trial should also be considered to ensure maintenance of robust equating with PISA.
63
180. Following the field trial half of the items would be selected to be included in the
ongoing PISA-Based Test for Schools. The final selection of items will be made to ensure that
coverage of the PISA Assessment Frameworks and the range of difficulty of the assessment
items is maintained.
181. All three scenarios described offer the opportunity to replace 50% of the items in
the PBT while at the same time ensuring framework coverage.
64
Appendix 1: Audit of items developed for the Phase 1 and Phase 2 FT-ES
Mathematics
Unit Item
Code Unit Name Item Format 2012 Content Context Process Developed for
Equating
Study
PM5000Q01 Large Hadron Collider Simple Multiple Choice Space and shape Scientific Employing Phase 1 No
PM5000Q02 Large Hadron Collider Constructed Response Manual Space and shape Scientific Employing Phase 1 No
PM5000Q03 Large Hadron Collider Constructed Response Manual Quantity Scientific Employing Phase 1 No
PM5001Q01 Traffic Lights Constructed Response Manual Quantity Societal Employing Phase 1 No
PM5001Q02 Traffic Lights Constructed Response Expert Quantity Societal Interpreting Phase 1 No
PM5002Q01 Internet Use Simple Multiple Choice Uncertainty and data Societal Employing Phase 1 Phase 1 & 2
PM5002Q02 Internet Use Simple Multiple Choice Quantity Societal Employing Phase 1 Phase 1 & 2
PM5002Q03 Internet Use Constructed Response Expert Change and relationships Societal Employing Phase 1 Phase 1
PM5002Q04 Internet Use Constructed Response Expert Change and relationships Societal Formulating Phase 1 Phase 1
PM5003Q01 TV News Constructed Response Manual Quantity Occupational Employing Phase 1 No
PM5003Q02 TV News Simple Multiple Choice Quantity Occupational Employing Phase 1 No
PM5004Q01 Watering A Football Pitch
Constructed Response Manual Quantity Occupational Employing Phase 1 Phase 1
PM5004Q02 Watering A Football Pitch Constructed Response Expert Quantity Occupational Interpreting Phase 1 Phase 1
PM5005Q01 Doubling Rules Simple Multiple Choice Change and relationships Societal Employing Phase 1 No
65
Unit Item
Code Unit Name Item Format 2012 Content Context Process Developed for
Equating
Study
PM5005Q02 Doubling Rules Constructed Response Manual
Change and relationships Scientific Employing Phase 1 No
PM5006Q01 Cylinder Lock Simple Multiple Choice Uncertainty and data Societal Employing Phase 1 Phase 1
PM5006Q02 Cylinder Lock Constructed Response Expert Uncertainty and data Scientific Interpreting Phase 1 Phase 1
PM5007Q01 Sun Room Constructed Response Manual Space and shape Societal Employing Phase 1 Phase 1
PM5007Q02 Sun Room Constructed Response Expert Space and shape Societal Employing Phase 1 Phase 1
PM5008Q01 Tiling Pattern Constructed Response Manual Space and shape Societal Employing Phase 1 Phase 1 & 2
PM5008Q02 Tiling Pattern Constructed Response Expert Space and shape Societal Employing Phase 1 Phase 1 & 2
PM5009Q01 Dress Pattern Constructed Response Expert Space and shape Personal Employing Phase 1 No
PM5009Q02 Dress Pattern Constructed Response Expert Space and shape Personal Employing Phase 1 No
PM5010Q01 Climbing Frame Complex Multiple Choice Space and shape Personal Interpreting Phase 1 Phase 1 & 2
PM5010Q02 Climbing Frame Constructed Response Manual Space and shape Personal Formulating Phase 1 Phase 1 & 2
PM5011Q01 Pentagon Knot Constructed Response Manual Space and shape Personal Employing Phase 1 No
PM5011Q02 Pentagon Knot Simple Multiple Choice Space and shape Personal Interpreting Phase 1 No
PM5012Q01 Trucking Business Constructed Response Expert Uncertainty and data Occupational Employing Phase 1 No
PM5012Q02 Trucking Business Constructed Response Expert Uncertainty and data Occupational Employing Phase 1 No
PM5012Q03 Trucking Business Constructed Response Expert Uncertainty and data Occupational Employing Phase 1 No
PM5013Q01 Energy Use Simple Multiple Choice Uncertainty and data Scientific Employing Phase 1 Phase 1 & 2
PM5013Q02 Energy Use Constructed Response Manual Uncertainty and data Scientific Employing Phase 1 Phase 1
PM5013Q03 Energy Use Constructed Response Manual Uncertainty and data Scientific Interpreting Phase 1 Phase 1 & 2
66
Unit Item
Code Unit Name Item Format 2012 Content Context Process Developed for
Equating
Study
PM5014Q01 Truck Constructed Response Manual
Change and relationships Occupational Employing Phase 1 No
PM5014Q02 Truck Simple Multiple Choice Quantity Occupational Employing Phase 1 No
PM5015Q01 Aspect Ratio Constructed Response Expert Quantity Personal Employing originally developed for PISA 2012, revised for PCT Phase 1
PM5015Q02 Aspect Ratio Simple Multiple Choice Change and relationships Personal Employing
originally developed for PISA 2012, revised for PCT Phase 1 & 2
PM5016Q01 Download Simple Multiple Choice Quantity Scientific Employing originally developed for PISA 2012, revised for PCT No
PM5016Q02 Download Constructed Response Manual Quantity Personal Employing
originally developed for PISA 2012, revised for PCT No
PM5017Q01 Weather Forecast Simple Multiple Choice Uncertainty and data Scientific Employing originally developed for PISA 2012, revised for PCT Phase 1
PM5017Q02 Weather Forecast Simple Multiple Choice Uncertainty and data Scientific Interpreting originally developed for PISA 2012, revised for PCT Phase 1 & 2
PM5017Q03 Weather Forecast Constructed Response Expert Uncertainty and data Scientific Formulating originally developed for PISA 2012, revised for PCT Phase 1 & 2
PM5018Q01 Steam Car Record Simple Multiple Choice Quantity Scientific Formulating originally developed for PISA 2012, revised for PCT No
PM5018Q02 Steam Car Record Constructed Response Expert Change and relationships Scientific Formulating
originally developed for PISA 2012, revised for PCT No
PM5019Q01 Angkor Wat Simple Multiple Choice Space and shape Societal Interpreting originally developed for PISA 2012, revised for PCT No
PM5019Q02 Angkor Wat Simple Multiple Choice Space and shape Societal Employing originally developed for PISA 2012, revised for PCT No
PM5019Q03 Angkor Wat Constructed Response Expert Quantity Societal Interpreting originally developed for PISA 2012, revised for PCT No
PM5020Q01 Golden Rectangle Simple Multiple Choice Change and Scientific Employing originally developed for PISA Phase 1
67
Unit Item
Code Unit Name Item Format 2012 Content Context Process Developed for
Equating
Study
relationships 2012, revised for PCT
PM5020Q02 Golden Rectangle Constructed Response Expert Change and relationships Scientific Employing
originally developed for PISA 2012, revised for PCT Phase 1 & 2
PM5020Q03 Golden Rectangle Simple Multiple Choice Change and relationships Scientific Formulating
originally developed for PISA 2012, revised for PCT Phase 1 & 2
PM5021Q01 Freezer Temperatures Complex Multiple Choice Quantity Occupational Interpreting
originally developed for PISA 2012, revised for PCT Phase 1 & 2
PM5021Q02 Freezer Temperatures
Constructed Response Manual Quantity Occupational Employing
originally developed for PISA 2012, revised for PCT Phase 1 & 2
PM5022Q01 Which Formula? Simple Multiple Choice Change and relationships Occupational Formulating
originally developed for PISA 2012, revised for PCT Phase 1 & 2
PM5022Q02 Which Formula? Constructed Response Expert Change and relationships Occupational Formulating
originally developed for PISA 2012, revised for PCT Phase 1 & 2
PM5023Q01 Old Drills Simple Multiple Choice Quantity Occupational Employing originally developed for PISA 2012, revised for PCT Phase 1
PM5023Q02 Old Drills Simple Multiple Choice Quantity Occupational Employing originally developed for PISA 2012, revised for PCT Phase 1
PM5024Q01 Tower Simple Multiple Choice Change and relationships Scientific Employing Phase 1 No
PM5024Q02 Tower Simple Multiple Choice Change and relationships Scientific Employing Phase 1 No
PM5025Q01 Penrose Triangle Constructed Response Manual Space and shape Personal Employing
originally developed for PISA 2012, revised for PCT No
PM5025Q02 Penrose Triangle Constructed Response Manual Space and shape Personal Employing
originally developed for PISA 2012, revised for PCT No
PM5026Q01 Sculpture Constructed Response Expert Change and relationships Scientific Formulating
originally developed for PISA 2012, revised for PCT Phase 1 & 2
PM5026Q02 Sculpture Constructed Response Change and Scientific Employing originally developed for PISA No
68
Unit Item
Code Unit Name Item Format 2012 Content Context Process Developed for
Equating
Study
Manual relationships 2012, revised for PCT
PM5027Q01 Space Station Constructed Response Manual Quantity Scientific Employing
originally developed for PISA 2012, revised for PCT No
PM5027Q02 Space Station Constructed Response Manual
Change and relationships Scientific Formulating
originally developed for PISA 2012, revised for PCT No
PM5027Q03 Space Station Constructed Response Expert Change and relationships Scientific Formulating
originally developed for PISA 2012, revised for PCT No
PM5100Q01 Ladder Simple Multiple Choice Change and relationships Occupational Interpreting Phase 2 No
PM5100Q02 Ladder Constructed Response Manual Space and shape Occupational Employing Phase 2 No
PM5101Q01 Lighthouse Simple Multiple Choice Space and shape Scientific Formulating Phase 2 Phase 2
PM5101Q02 Lighthouse Constructed Response Manual Quantity Scientific Employing Phase 2 Phase 2
PM5102Q01 Tree Trunk Simple Multiple Choice Change and relationships Scientific Employing Phase 2 Phase 2
PM5103Q01 Basketball Squad Simple Multiple Choice Uncertainty and data Societal Employing Phase 2 No
PM5103Q02 Basketball Squad Constructed Response Manual Uncertainty and data Societal Interpreting Phase 2 No
PM5103Q03 Basketball Squad Simple Multiple Choice Uncertainty and data Societal Interpreting Phase 2 No
PM5104Q01 Baby Growth Simple Multiple Choice Uncertainty and data Personal Formulating Phase 2 Phase 2
PM5104Q02 Baby Growth Simple Multiple Choice Uncertainty and data Personal Employing Phase 2 Phase 2
PM5105Q01 Trout Farm Constructed Response Manual Uncertainty and data Occupational Employing Phase 2 No
PM5105Q02 Trout Farm Complex Multiple Choice Uncertainty and data Occupational Interpreting Phase 2 No
PM5106Q01 Free Tickets Simple Multiple Choice Uncertainty and data Societal Formulating Phase 2 Phase 2
69
Unit Item
Code Unit Name Item Format 2012 Content Context Process Developed for
Equating
Study
PM5106Q02 Free Tickets Constructed Response Expert Uncertainty and data Societal Formulating Phase 2 Phase 2
PM5107Q01 Taxi Fares Constructed Response Manual Quantity Societal Employing Phase 2 Phase 2
PM5107Q02 Taxi Fares Constructed Response Expert Quantity Societal Employing Phase 2 Phase 2
PM5108Q01 Tiles Constructed Response Manual Space and shape Occupational Formulating Phase 2 No
PM5108Q02 Tiles Constructed Response Manual Quantity Occupational Employing Phase 2 No
PM5109Q01 Arrowhead Kite Constructed Response Manual Space and shape Personal Employing Phase 2 Phase 2
PM5109Q02 Arrowhead Kite Constructed Response Expert Space and shape Personal Employing Phase 2 Phase 2
PM5110Q01 Fence Constructed Response Manual
Change and relationships Occupational Formulating Phase 2 Phase 2
PM5110Q02 Fence Constructed Response Expert Change and relationships Occupational Formulating Phase 2 Phase 2
PM5120Q01 Rolling Ball Game Constructed Response Manual Quantity Personal Employing Phase 2 No
PM5120Q02 Rolling Ball Game Complex Multiple Choice Change and relationships Personal Formulating Phase 2 No
PM5120Q03 Rolling Ball Game Constructed Response Manual Uncertainty and data Personal Formulating Phase 2 No
PM5121Q01 Leisure Time Simple Multiple Choice Uncertainty and data Societal Formulating Phase 2 Phase 2
PM5121Q02 Leisure Time Complex Multiple Choice Uncertainty and data Societal Interpreting Phase 2 No
PM5122Q01 Picture Frames Simple Multiple Choice Quantity Occupational Employing Phase 2 No
PM5122Q02 Picture Frames Constructed Response Manual Quantity Occupational Formulating Phase 2 No
70
Unit Item
Code Unit Name Item Format 2012 Content Context Process Developed for
Equating
Study
PM5122Q03 Picture Frames Constructed Response Manual
Change and relationships Occupational Employing Phase 2 No
PM5123Q01 Olympic Gold Medals Complex Multiple Choice Uncertainty and data Societal Interpreting Phase 2 No
PM5123Q02 Olympic Gold Medals Simple Multiple Choice Uncertainty and data Societal Employing Phase 2 No
PM5124Q01 Concrete Constructed Response Manual
Change and relationships Occupational Formulating Phase 2 Phase 2
PM5124Q02 Concrete Constructed Response Manual
Change and relationships Occupational Formulating Phase 2 Phase 2
PM5124Q03 Concrete Constructed Response Manual
Change and relationships Occupational Formulating Phase 2 Phase 2
PM5140Q01 Botswana Simple Multiple Choice Space and shape Societal Interpreting Phase 2 Phase 2
PM5140Q02 Botswana Constructed Response Manual Space and shape Societal Formulating Phase 2 Phase 2
PM5140Q03 Botswana Simple Multiple Choice Quantity Societal Employing Phase 2 Phase 2
PM5141Q01 Contours Simple Multiple Choice Space and shape Scientific Interpreting Phase 2 No
PM5141Q02 Contours Constructed Response Manual Quantity Scientific Interpreting Phase 2 No
PM5141Q03 Contours Simple Multiple Choice Change and relationships Scientific Interpreting Phase 2 No
PM5142Q01 Machu Picchu Constructed Response Manual Quantity Societal Interpreting Phase 2 Phase 2
PM5142Q02 Machu Picchu Constructed Response Manual Quantity Societal Employing Phase 2 Phase 2
PM5142Q03 Machu Picchu Simple Multiple Choice Quantity Societal Formulating Phase 2 No
PM5143Q01 Titan Simple Multiple Choice Quantity Scientific Formulating Phase 2 No
PM5143Q02 Titan Simple Multiple Choice Quantity Scientific Employing Phase 2 No
71
Unit Item
Code Unit Name Item Format 2012 Content Context Process Developed for
Equating
Study
PM5143Q03 Titan Constructed Response Manual Quantity Scientific Employing Phase 2 No
PM5144Q01 Can Of Drink Simple Multiple Choice Quantity Societal Employing Phase 2 No
PM5145Q01 Decagon Tiles Constructed Response Manual Space and shape Scientific Employing Phase 2 Phase 2
PM5145Q02 Decagon Tiles Constructed Response Expert Space and shape Scientific Employing Phase 2 Phase 2
PM5146Q01 Iron-On Image Simple Multiple Choice Space and shape Occupational Employing Phase 2 Phase 2
PM5146Q02 Iron-On Image Constructed Response Manual Quantity Occupational Formulating Phase 2 Phase 2
PM5146Q03 Iron-On Image Simple Multiple Choice Quantity Occupational Employing Phase 2 No
PM5147Q01 Road Map Simple Multiple Choice Space and shape Personal Interpreting Phase 2 No
PM5147Q02 Road Map Constructed Response Manual Space and shape Personal Employing Phase 2 No
PM5148Q01 Hedge Simple Multiple Choice Space and shape Occupational Interpreting Phase 2 No
PM5149Q01 Race Track Simple Multiple Choice Space and shape Societal Interpreting Phase 2 No
PM5149Q02 Race Track Complex Multiple Choice Space and shape Societal Interpreting Phase 2 No
PM5150Q01 Eight Sided Dice Simple Multiple Choice Space and shape Occupational Interpreting Phase 2 No
PM5160Q01 Flatback Turtles Simple Multiple Choice Quantity Scientific Employing Phase 2 Phase 2
PM5161Q01 Aeroplane Landing Constructed Response Manual
Change and relationships Occupational Employing Phase 2 No
PM5161Q02 Aeroplane Landing Constructed Response Expert Change and relationships Occupational Interpreting Phase 2 No
PM5162Q01 New Runway Constructed Response Manual Quantity Occupational Employing Phase 2 No
PM5163Q01 Hair Gel Constructed Response Manual Quantity Personal Employing Phase 2 Phase 2
72
Unit Item
Code Unit Name Item Format 2012 Content Context Process Developed for
Equating
Study
PM5164Q01 Gas Cylinders Constructed Response Manual Quantity Occupational Employing Phase 2 No
PM5165Q01 Internet Advertising Constructed Response Manual
Change and relationships Occupational Employing Phase 2 No
PM5165Q02 Internet Advertising Constructed Response Manual
Change and relationships Occupational Formulating Phase 2 No
PM5166Q01 Silk Scarves Constructed Response Manual Space and shape Personal Employing Phase 2 No
PM5167Q01 Digital Music Constructed Response Manual Uncertainty and data Personal Employing Phase 2 No
PM5168Q01 Flag Of Zedland Constructed Response Manual Space and shape Societal Employing Phase 2 No
PM5168Q02 Flag Of Zedland Constructed Response Manual Quantity Societal Employing Phase 2 No
PM5168Q03 Flag Of Zedland Complex Multiple Choice Space and shape Societal Employing Phase 2 No
PM5169Q01 Shoe Sizes Constructed Response Manual
Change and relationships Personal Employing Phase 2 Phase 2
PM5169Q02 Shoe Sizes Constructed Response Manual
Change and relationships Personal Employing Phase 2 Phase 2
PM5181Q01 Pendulum Constructed Response Manual Uncertainty and data Scientific Employing Phase 2 Phase 2
PM5181Q02 Pendulum Constructed Response Manual
Change and relationships Scientific Employing Phase 2 Phase 2
PM5182Q01 Network Growth Simple Multiple Choice Quantity Societal Employing Phase 2 No
PM5182Q02 Network Growth Constructed Response Expert Quantity Societal Formulating Phase 2 No
PM5183Q01 House Frame Constructed Response Expert Space and shape Occupational Interpreting Phase 2 Phase 2
PM5183Q02 House Frame Simple Multiple Choice Space and shape Occupational Formulating Phase 2 Phase 2
73
Unit Item
Code Unit Name Item Format 2012 Content Context Process Developed for
Equating
Study
PM5184Q01 Networking Statistics Constructed Response Expert Uncertainty and data Societal Employing Phase 2 No
PM5184Q02 Networking Statistics Complex Multiple Choice Uncertainty and data Societal Interpreting Phase 2 No
PM5185Q01 Jeans Sizes Simple Multiple Choice Uncertainty and data Societal Interpreting Phase 2 Phase 2
PM5185Q02 Jeans Sizes Complex Multiple Choice Change and relationships Societal Interpreting Phase 2 Phase 2
PM5186Q01 Age Of Mothers Simple Multiple Choice Uncertainty and data Societal Interpreting Phase 2 No
PM5186Q02 Age Of Mothers Simple Multiple Choice Uncertainty and data Societal Interpreting Phase 2 No
PM5186Q03 Age Of Mothers Complex Multiple Choice Uncertainty and data Societal Employing Phase 2 Phase 2
PM5186Q04 Age Of Mothers Constructed Response Manual Uncertainty and data Societal Interpreting Phase 2 No
PM5187Q01 Jaden’s House Simple Multiple Choice Space and shape Personal Interpreting Phase 2 Phase 2
PM5187Q02 Jaden’s House Constructed Response Expert Space and shape Personal Employing Phase 2 Phase 2
PM5188Q01 Car Speed Constructed Response Manual Uncertainty and data Societal Employing Phase 2 Phase 2
PM5188Q02 Car Speed Constructed Response Manual Uncertainty and data Societal Employing Phase 2 Phase 2
PM5189Q01 Fill A Room Competition Constructed Response Expert Quantity Personal Employing Phase 2 Phase 2
PM5189Q02 Fill A Room Competition Constructed Response Expert Quantity Personal Employing Phase 2 Phase 2
PM5191Q01 Word Length Constructed Response Manual Uncertainty and data Societal Interpreting Phase 2 No
PM5191Q02 Word Length Complex Multiple Choice Uncertainty and data Societal Interpreting Phase 2 No
74
Reading
Unit Item
Code Unit Name Item Format 2012 Situation Text Format Text Type Aspect
Developed
for
Equating
Study
PR6000Q01 Honeybee Simple Multiple Choice Educational Mixed Description Access and retrieve Phase 1 No
PR6000Q02 Honeybee Complex Multiple Choice Educational Mixed Description Access and retrieve Phase 1 No
PR6000Q03A Honeybee Simple Multiple Choice Educational Mixed Description Integrate and interpret Phase 1 No
PR6000Q03B Honeybee Constructed Response Expert Educational Mixed Description Reflect and evaluate Phase 1 No
PR6000Q04 Honeybee Constructed Response Expert Educational Mixed Description Integrate and interpret Phase 1 No
PR6000Q05 Honeybee Constructed Response Expert Educational Mixed Description Reflect and evaluate Phase 1 No
PR6001Q01 Longer Life Simple Multiple Choice Personal Continuous Exposition Integrate and interpret Phase 1 No
PR6001Q02 Longer Life Constructed Response Expert Personal Continuous Exposition Reflect and evaluate Phase 1 No
PR6001Q02X Longer Life Constructed Response Expert Personal Continuous Exposition Reflect and evaluate Phase 1 No
PR6001Q03 Longer Life Simple Multiple Choice Personal Continuous Exposition Integrate and interpret Phase 1 No
PR6001Q04 Longer Life Constructed Response Expert Personal Continuous Exposition Integrate and interpret Phase 1 No
PR6001Q05 Longer Life Constructed Response Expert Personal Continuous Exposition Integrate and interpret Phase 1 No
PR6002Q01 Egyptian Mummies Simple Multiple Choice Educational Continuous Exposition Integrate and interpret Phase 1 Phase 1
75
Unit Item
Code Unit Name Item Format 2012 Situation Text Format Text Type Aspect
Developed
for
Equating
Study
PR6002Q02 Egyptian Mummies Complex Multiple Choice Educational Continuous Exposition Access and retrieve Phase 1 Phase 1
PR6002Q03 Egyptian Mummies Complex Multiple Choice Educational Continuous Exposition Integrate and interpret Phase 1 No
PR6002Q04 Egyptian Mummies Constructed Response Expert Educational Continuous Exposition Access and retrieve Phase 1 Phase 1
PR6002Q05 Egyptian Mummies Simple Multiple Choice Educational Continuous Exposition Integrate and interpret Phase 1 Phase 1
PR6002Q06 Egyptian Mummies Simple Multiple Choice Educational Continuous Exposition Reflect and evaluate Phase 1 No
PR6002Q07 Egyptian Mummies Constructed Response Expert Educational Continuous Exposition Reflect and evaluate Phase 1 No
PR6003Q01 Indian Mystic Simple Multiple Choice Personal Continuous Argumentation Integrate and interpret Phase 1 Phase 1
PR6003Q02 Indian Mystic Constructed Response Expert Personal Continuous Argumentation Integrate and interpret Phase 1 Phase 1 & 2
PR6003Q03 Indian Mystic Simple Multiple Choice Personal Continuous Argumentation Reflect and evaluate Phase 1 No
PR6003Q04 Indian Mystic Simple Multiple Choice Personal Continuous Argumentation Integrate and interpret Phase 1 Phase 1 & 2
PR6003Q05 Indian Mystic Constructed Response Expert Personal Continuous Argumentation Reflect and evaluate Phase 1 Phase 1 & 2
PR6003Q06 Indian Mystic Simple Multiple Choice Personal Continuous Argumentation Integrate and interpret Phase 1 No
PR6003Q07 Indian Mystic Simple Multiple Choice Personal Continuous Argumentation Reflect and evaluate Phase 1 No
PR6004Q01 Museum Park Constructed Response Manual Public Non-continuous Description
Access and retrieve Phase 1 Phase 1 & 2
76
Unit Item
Code Unit Name Item Format 2012 Situation Text Format Text Type Aspect
Developed
for
Equating
Study
PR6004Q02A Museum Park Constructed Response Manual Public Non-continuous Description
Integrate and interpret Phase 1 Phase 1
PR6004Q02B Museum Park Constructed Response Expert Public Non-continuous Description Integrate and interpret Phase 1 Phase 1
PR6004Q03 Museum Park Simple Multiple Choice Public Non-continuous Description Access and retrieve Phase 1 Phase 1 & 2
PR6004Q04 Museum Park Simple Multiple Choice Public Non-continuous Description Access and retrieve Phase 1 No
PR6004Q05A Museum Park Not scored
Phase 1 Phase 1 & 2
PR6004Q05B Museum Park Constructed Response Expert Public Non-continuous Description Reflect and evaluate Phase 1 Phase 1 & 2
PR6004Q06 Museum Park Simple Multiple Choice Public Non-continuous Description Access and retrieve Phase 1 Phase 1 & 2
PR6005Q01 Eye Direction and Lying Simple Multiple Choice Personal Mixed Description
Integrate and interpret Phase 1 No
PR6005Q02 Eye Direction and Lying Simple Multiple Choice Personal Mixed Description
Access and retrieve Phase 1 No
PR6005Q03 Eye Direction and Lying
Constructed Response Manual Personal Mixed Description
Integrate and interpret Phase 1 No
PR6005Q04 Eye Direction and Lying Simple Multiple Choice Personal Mixed Description
Access and retrieve Phase 1 No
PR6005Q05 Eye Direction and Lying Simple Multiple Choice Personal Mixed Description
Integrate and interpret Phase 1 No
PR6005Q06 Eye Direction and Lying Constructed Response Expert Personal Mixed Description
Reflect and evaluate Phase 1 No
PR6005Q07 Eye Direction and Lying Constructed Response Expert Personal Mixed Description
Reflect and evaluate Phase 1 No
77
Unit Item
Code Unit Name Item Format 2012 Situation Text Format Text Type Aspect
Developed
for
Equating
Study
PR6006Q01 Free Simple Multiple Choice Personal Continuous Exposition Integrate and interpret Phase 1 Phase 1
PR6006Q01X Free Simple Multiple Choice Personal Continuous Exposition Integrate and interpret Phase 1 No
PR6006Q02 Free Constructed Response Expert Personal Continuous Exposition Reflect and evaluate Phase 1 Phase 1
PR6006Q04 Free Simple Multiple Choice Personal Continuous Exposition Integrate and interpret Phase 1 No
PR6006Q05A Free Simple Multiple Choice Personal Continuous Exposition Reflect and evaluate Phase 1 Phase 1
PR6006Q05B Free Constructed Response Expert Personal Continuous Exposition Reflect and evaluate Phase 1 Phase 1
PR6006Q05X Free Constructed Response Expert Personal Continuous Exposition Integrate and interpret Phase 1 No
PR6006Q06 Free Constructed Response Expert Personal Continuous Exposition Reflect and evaluate Phase 1 No
PR6008Q01 Mobile Phones Simple Multiple Choice Public Non-continuous Description Integrate and interpret Phase 1 No
PR6008Q02 Mobile Phones Constructed Response Manual Public Non-continuous Description
Access and retrieve Phase 1 Phase 1 & 2
PR6008Q03 Mobile Phones Simple Multiple Choice Public Non-continuous Description Integrate and interpret Phase 1 Phase 1 & 2
PR6008Q04 Mobile Phones Constructed Response Expert Public Non-continuous Description Reflect and evaluate Phase 1 Phase 1 & 2
PR6008Q05 Mobile Phones Constructed Response Manual Public Non-continuous Description
Access and retrieve Phase 1 Phase 1 & 2
PR6008Q06 Mobile Phones Constructed Response Expert Public Non-continuous Description Integrate and interpret Phase 1 Phase 1 & 2
78
Unit Item
Code Unit Name Item Format 2012 Situation Text Format Text Type Aspect
Developed
for
Equating
Study
PR6009Q01 Tennis Grunts Simple Multiple Choice Personal Continuous Exposition Integrate and interpret Phase 1 no
PR6009Q02 Tennis Grunts Simple Multiple Choice Personal Continuous Exposition Integrate and interpret Phase 1 no
PR6009Q03 Tennis Grunts Simple Multiple Choice Personal Continuous Exposition Integrate and interpret Phase 1 no
PR6009Q04 Tennis Grunts Simple Multiple Choice Personal Continuous Exposition Access and retrieve Phase 1 no
PR6009Q05 Tennis Grunts Simple Multiple Choice Personal Continuous Exposition Integrate and interpret Phase 1 no
PR6009Q06 Tennis Grunts Constructed Response Expert Personal Continuous Exposition Reflect and evaluate Phase 1 no
PR6009Q07 Tennis Grunts Constructed Response Expert Personal Continuous Exposition Reflect and evaluate Phase 1 no
PR6009Q08 Tennis Grunts Constructed Response Expert Personal Continuous Exposition Reflect and evaluate Phase 1 no
PR6010Q01 Exploration Today Simple Multiple Choice Educational Continuous Exposition Access and retrieve Phase 1 Phase 1 & 2
PR6010Q02 Exploration Today Simple Multiple Choice Educational Continuous Exposition Integrate and interpret Phase 1 no
PR6010Q03 Exploration Today Constructed Response Expert Educational Continuous Exposition Integrate and interpret Phase 1 Phase 1 & 2
PR6010Q04 Exploration Today Simple Multiple Choice Educational Continuous Exposition Integrate and interpret Phase 1 Phase 1 & 2
PR6010Q05 Exploration Today Constructed Response Expert Educational Continuous Exposition Integrate and interpret Phase 1 no
PR6010Q06 Exploration Today Simple Multiple Choice Educational Continuous Exposition Integrate and interpret Phase 1 Phase 1 & 2
79
Unit Item
Code Unit Name Item Format 2012 Situation Text Format Text Type Aspect
Developed
for
Equating
Study
PR6010Q07 Exploration Today Constructed Response Expert Educational Continuous Exposition Reflect and evaluate Phase 1 Phase 1 & 2
PR6010Q07X Exploration Today Simple Multiple Choice Educational Continuous Exposition Integrate and interpret Phase 1 no
PR6011Q01 Returning Simple Multiple Choice Personal Continuous Narration Access and retrieve Phase 1 Phase 1
PR6011Q02 Returning Simple Multiple Choice Personal Continuous Narration Integrate and interpret Phase 1 No
PR6011Q03 Returning Simple Multiple Choice Personal Continuous Narration Integrate and interpret Phase 1 Phase 1
PR6011Q04 Returning Simple Multiple Choice Personal Continuous Narration Integrate and interpret Phase 1 No
PR6011Q05 Returning Constructed Response Expert Personal Continuous Narration Integrate and interpret Phase 1 Phase 1
PR6011Q06 Returning Constructed Response Expert Personal Continuous Narration Integrate and interpret Phase 1 Phase 1
PR6011Q07 Returning Constructed Response Expert Personal Continuous Narration Integrate and interpret Phase 1 Phase 1
PR6012Q01 On The Island Simple Multiple Choice Personal Continuous Narration Integrate and interpret Phase 1 No
PR6012Q02 On The Island Simple Multiple Choice Personal Continuous Narration Integrate and interpret Phase 1 No
PR6012Q03 On The Island Constructed Response Expert Personal Continuous Narration Integrate and interpret Phase 1 No
PR6012Q04 On The Island Simple Multiple Choice Personal Continuous Narration Integrate and interpret Phase 1 No
PR6012Q05 On The Island Simple Multiple Choice Personal Continuous Narration Integrate and interpret Phase 1 No
80
Unit Item
Code Unit Name Item Format 2012 Situation Text Format Text Type Aspect
Developed
for
Equating
Study
PR6012Q06 On The Island Simple Multiple Choice Personal Continuous Narration Integrate and interpret Phase 1 No
PR6012Q07 On The Island Simple Multiple Choice Personal Continuous Narration Integrate and interpret Phase 1 No
PR6012Q08 On The Island Simple Multiple Choice Personal Continuous Narration Integrate and interpret Phase 1 No
PR6012Q09 On The Island Simple Multiple Choice Personal Continuous Narration Integrate and interpret Phase 1 No
PR6012Q10 On The Island Simple Multiple Choice Personal Continuous Narration Reflect and evaluate Phase 1 No
PR6012Q11 On The Island Constructed Response Expert Personal Continuous Narration Integrate and interpret Phase 1 No
PR6013Q01 About Cats Simple Multiple Choice Personal Continuous Argumentation Integrate and interpret Phase 1 Phase 1 & 2
PR6013Q02 About Cats Simple Multiple Choice Personal Continuous Argumentation Integrate and interpret Phase 1 No
PR6013Q03 About Cats Constructed Response Expert Personal Continuous Argumentation Integrate and interpret Phase 1 Phase 1 & 2
PR6013Q04 About Cats Simple Multiple Choice Personal Continuous Argumentation Access and retrieve Phase 1 Phase 1 & 2
PR6013Q05 About Cats Constructed Response Expert Personal Continuous Argumentation Integrate and interpret Phase 1 Phase 1 & 2
PR6013Q06 About Cats Simple Multiple Choice Personal Continuous Argumentation Reflect and evaluate Phase 1 Phase 1 & 2
PR6013Q07 About Cats Constructed Response Expert Personal Continuous Argumentation Reflect and evaluate Phase 1 No
PR6013Q08 About Cats Constructed Response Expert Personal Continuous Argumentation Reflect and evaluate Phase 1 Phase 1
81
Unit Item
Code Unit Name Item Format 2012 Situation Text Format Text Type Aspect
Developed
for
Equating
Study
PR6013Q09 About Cats Simple Multiple Choice Personal Continuous Argumentation Integrate and interpret Phase 1 No
PR6013Q10 About Cats Simple Multiple Choice Personal Continuous Argumentation Integrate and interpret Phase 1 No
PR6014Q01 The Job of an Air Traffic Controller Simple Multiple Choice Occupational Continuous Description
Integrate and interpret Phase 1 Phase 1
PR6014Q02 The Job of an Air Traffic Controller Simple Multiple Choice Occupational Continuous Description
Integrate and interpret Phase 1 No
PR6014Q03 The Job of an Air Traffic Controller Simple Multiple Choice Occupational Continuous Description
Reflect and evaluate Phase 1 Phase 1
PR6014Q04 The Job of an Air Traffic Controller Simple Multiple Choice Occupational Continuous Description
Integrate and interpret Phase 1 No
PR6014Q05 The Job of an Air Traffic Controller Constructed Response Expert Occupational Continuous Description
Integrate and interpret Phase 1 No
PR6014Q06 The Job of an Air Traffic Controller Complex Multiple Choice Occupational Continuous Description
Access and retrieve Phase 1 Phase 1
PR6014Q06X The Job of an Air Traffic Controller Constructed Response Expert Occupational Continuous Description
Reflect and evaluate Phase 1 No
PR6014Q07 The Job of an Air Traffic Controller Constructed Response Expert Occupational Continuous Description
Reflect and evaluate Phase 1 Phase 1
PR6015Q01 Kenya Tourism and Conservation Simple Multiple Choice Educational Continuous Description
Reflect and evaluate Phase 1 Phase 1
PR6015Q02 Kenya Tourism and Conservation Simple Multiple Choice Educational Non-continuous Description
Integrate and interpret Phase 1 No
PR6015Q03 Kenya Tourism and Conservation Constructed Response Expert Educational Continuous Description
Integrate and interpret Phase 1 Phase 1 & 2
PR6015Q04 Kenya Tourism and Conservation
Constructed Response Manual Educational Continuous Description
Access and retrieve Phase 1 Phase 1 & 2
82
Unit Item
Code Unit Name Item Format 2012 Situation Text Format Text Type Aspect
Developed
for
Equating
Study
PR6015Q05 Kenya Tourism and Conservation
Constructed Response Manual Educational Non-continuous Description
Access and retrieve Phase 1 No
PR6015Q06 Kenya Tourism and Conservation Simple Multiple Choice Educational Non-continuous Description
Access and retrieve Phase 1 Phase 1 & 2
PR6015Q07 Kenya Tourism and Conservation Simple Multiple Choice Educational Non-continuous Description
Reflect and evaluate Phase 1 Phase 1 & 2
PR6015Q08 Kenya Tourism and Conservation Simple Multiple Choice Educational Mixed Description
Reflect and evaluate Phase 1 No
PR6017Q01 The Two Campaigns Constructed Response Expert Personal Continuous Narration Access and retrieve Phase 2 No
PR6017Q02 The Two Campaigns Constructed Response Expert Personal Continuous Narration Reflect and evaluate Phase 2 No
PR6017Q03 The Two Campaigns Simple Multiple Choice Personal Continuous Narration Integrate and interpret Phase 2 No
PR6017Q04 The Two Campaigns Simple Multiple Choice Personal Continuous Narration Integrate and interpret Phase 2 Phase 2
PR6017Q05 The Two Campaigns Complex Multiple Choice Personal Continuous Narration Integrate and interpret Phase 2 Phase 2
PR6017Q06 The Two Campaigns Constructed Response Expert Personal Continuous Narration Access and retrieve Phase 2 No
PR6017Q07 The Two Campaigns Simple Multiple Choice Personal Continuous Narration Integrate and interpret Phase 2 No
PR6017Q08 The Two Campaigns Constructed Response Expert Personal Continuous Narration Integrate and interpret Phase 2 Phase 2
PR6017Q09 The Two Campaigns Simple Multiple Choice Personal Continuous Narration Integrate and interpret Phase 2 No
PR6017Q10 The Two Campaigns Simple Multiple Choice Personal Continuous Narration Access and retrieve Phase 2 Phase 2
83
Unit Item
Code Unit Name Item Format 2012 Situation Text Format Text Type Aspect
Developed
for
Equating
Study
PR6017Q11 The Two Campaigns Simple Multiple Choice Personal Continuous Narration Integrate and interpret Phase 2 Phase 2
PR6017Q12 The Two Campaigns Simple Multiple Choice Personal Continuous Narration Integrate and interpret Phase 2 No
PR6018Q01 Aski Gym Youth Programme Complex Multiple Choice Personal Continuous Argumentation
Access and retrieve Phase 2 Phase 2
PR6018Q02 Aski Gym Youth Programme Simple Multiple Choice Personal Continuous Argumentation
Access and retrieve Phase 2 No
PR6018Q03 Aski Gym Youth Programme Constructed Response Expert Personal Continuous Argumentation
Integrate and interpret Phase 2 Phase 2
PR6018Q04 Aski Gym Youth Programme Complex Multiple Choice Personal Continuous Argumentation
Access and retrieve Phase 2 Phase 2
PR6018Q05 Aski Gym Youth Programme Constructed Response Expert Personal Continuous Argumentation
Integrate and interpret Phase 2 No
PR6018Q06 Aski Gym Youth Programme Constructed Response Expert Personal Mixed Argumentation
Integrate and interpret Phase 2 Phase 2
PR6018Q07 Aski Gym Youth Programme Constructed Response Expert Personal Continuous Argumentation
Reflect and evaluate Phase 2 No
PR6018Q08 Aski Gym Youth Programme Constructed Response Expert Personal Continuous Argumentation
Integrate and interpret Phase 2 Phase 2
PR6018Q09 Aski Gym Youth Programme Constructed Response Expert Personal Mixed Argumentation
Reflect and evaluate Phase 2 Phase 2
PR6019Q01 Writing a Travel Article Simple Multiple Choice Educational Continuous Instruction
Integrate and interpret Phase 2 No
PR6019Q02 Writing a Travel Article Simple Multiple Choice Educational Continuous Instruction
Integrate and interpret Phase 2 Phase 2
PR6019Q03 Writing a Travel Article Simple Multiple Choice Educational Continuous Instruction
Integrate and interpret Phase 2 No
84
Unit Item
Code Unit Name Item Format 2012 Situation Text Format Text Type Aspect
Developed
for
Equating
Study
PR6019Q04 Writing a Travel Article Complex Multiple Choice Educational Continuous Instruction
Access and retrieve Phase 2 No
PR6019Q05 Writing a Travel Article Simple Multiple Choice Educational Continuous Instruction
Reflect and evaluate Phase 2 Phase 2
PR6019Q06 Writing a Travel Article Simple Multiple Choice Educational Continuous Instruction
Integrate and interpret Phase 2 No
PR6019Q07 Writing a Travel Article Simple Multiple Choice Educational Continuous Instruction
Integrate and interpret Phase 2 Phase 2
PR6019Q08 Writing a Travel Article Simple Multiple Choice Educational Continuous Instruction
Integrate and interpret Phase 2 Phase 2
PR6019Q09 Writing a Travel Article Constructed Response Expert Educational Continuous Instruction
Reflect and evaluate Phase 2 Phase 2
PR6020Q01 Well-being in the United States Simple Multiple Choice Public Non-continuous Exposition
Integrate and interpret Phase 2 No
PR6020Q02 Well-being in the United States Complex Multiple Choice Public Non-continuous Exposition
Integrate and interpret Phase 2 Phase 2
PR6020Q03 Well-being in the United States Constructed Response Expert Public Non-continuous Exposition
Integrate and interpret Phase 2 No
PR6020Q04 Well-being in the United States Simple Multiple Choice Public Non-continuous Exposition
Integrate and interpret Phase 2 Phase 2
PR6020Q05 Well-being in the United States Simple Multiple Choice Public Non-continuous Exposition
Integrate and interpret Phase 2 No
PR6020Q06 Well-being in the United States Simple Multiple Choice Public Non-continuous Exposition
Reflect and evaluate Phase 2 No
PR6020Q07 Well-being in the United States Constructed Response Expert Public Non-continuous Exposition
Reflect and evaluate Phase 2 Phase 2
PR6020Q08 Well-being in the United States Simple Multiple Choice Public Non-continuous Exposition
Integrate and interpret Phase 2 No
85
Unit Item
Code Unit Name Item Format 2012 Situation Text Format Text Type Aspect
Developed
for
Equating
Study
PR6020Q09 Well-being in the United States Constructed Response Expert Public Non-continuous Exposition
Integrate and interpret Phase 2 Phase 2
PR6020Q10 Well-being in the United States Constructed Response Expert Public Non-continuous Exposition
Reflect and evaluate Phase 2 No
PR6021Q01 Greek and Chinese Science Simple Multiple Choice Educational Continuous Argumentation
Integrate and interpret Phase 2 No
PR6021Q02 Greek and Chinese Science Simple Multiple Choice Educational Continuous Argumentation
Integrate and interpret Phase 2 No
PR6021Q03 Greek and Chinese Science Constructed Response Expert Educational Continuous Argumentation
Integrate and interpret Phase 2 No
PR6021Q04 Greek and Chinese Science Simple Multiple Choice Educational Continuous Argumentation
Reflect and evaluate Phase 2 No
PR6021Q05 Greek and Chinese Science Simple Multiple Choice Educational Continuous Argumentation
Integrate and interpret Phase 2 No
PR6021Q06 Greek and Chinese Science Simple Multiple Choice Educational Continuous Argumentation
Integrate and interpret Phase 2 No
PR6021Q07 Greek and Chinese Science Simple Multiple Choice Educational Continuous Argumentation
Integrate and interpret Phase 2 No
PR6021Q08 Greek and Chinese Science Constructed Response Expert Educational Continuous Argumentation
Reflect and evaluate Phase 2 No
PR6021Q09 Greek and Chinese Science Simple Multiple Choice Educational Continuous Argumentation
Access and retrieve Phase 2 No
PR6021Q10 Greek and Chinese Science Simple Multiple Choice Educational Continuous Argumentation
Integrate and interpret Phase 2 No
PR6022Q01 Lost at Sea Simple Multiple Choice Personal Continuous Narration Access and retrieve Phase 2 Phase 2
PR6022Q02 Lost at Sea Simple Multiple Choice Personal Continuous Narration Integrate and interpret Phase 2 No
86
Unit Item
Code Unit Name Item Format 2012 Situation Text Format Text Type Aspect
Developed
for
Equating
Study
PR6022Q03 Lost at Sea Simple Multiple Choice Personal Continuous Narration Access and retrieve Phase 2 Phase 2
PR6022Q04 Lost at Sea Constructed Response Expert Personal Continuous Narration Integrate and interpret Phase 2 No
PR6022Q05 Lost at Sea Constructed Response Expert Personal Continuous Narration Integrate and interpret Phase 2 No
PR6022Q06 Lost at Sea Constructed Response Expert Personal Continuous Narration Integrate and interpret Phase 2 No
PR6022Q07 Lost at Sea Constructed Response Expert Personal Continuous Narration Reflect and evaluate Phase 2 Phase 2
PR6022Q08 Lost at Sea Simple Multiple Choice Personal Continuous Narration Integrate and interpret Phase 2 Phase 2
PR6022Q09 Lost at Sea Simple Multiple Choice Personal Continuous Narration Reflect and evaluate Phase 2 Phase 2
PR6022Q10 Lost at Sea Simple Multiple Choice Personal Continuous Narration Access and retrieve Phase 2 No
PR6023Q01 Trial by Teen Simple Multiple Choice Occupational Mixed Argumentation Reflect and evaluate Phase 2 Phase 2
PR6023Q02 Trial by Teen Constructed Response Expert Occupational Mixed Argumentation Access and retrieve Phase 2 No
PR6023Q03 Trial by Teen Constructed Response Expert Occupational Mixed Argumentation Integrate and interpret Phase 2 Phase 2
PR6023Q04 Trial by Teen Simple Multiple Choice Occupational Mixed Argumentation Integrate and interpret Phase 2 No
PR6023Q05 Trial by Teen Constructed Response Expert Occupational Mixed Argumentation Access and retrieve Phase 2 No
PR6023Q06 Trial by Teen Simple Multiple Choice Occupational Continuous Argumentation Integrate and interpret Phase 2 Phase 2
87
Unit Item
Code Unit Name Item Format 2012 Situation Text Format Text Type Aspect
Developed
for
Equating
Study
PR6023Q07 Trial by Teen Simple Multiple Choice Occupational Mixed Argumentation Integrate and interpret Phase 2 Phase 2
PR6023Q08 Trial by Teen Constructed Response Expert Occupational Non-continuous Argumentation Reflect and evaluate Phase 2 Phase 2
PR6023Q09 Trial by Teen Simple Multiple Choice Occupational Mixed Argumentation Integrate and interpret Phase 2 No
PR6023Q10 Trial by Teen Simple Multiple Choice Occupational Mixed Argumentation Integrate and interpret Phase 2 No
PR6024Q01 The Sculpture Simple Multiple Choice Educational Continuous Description Access and retrieve Phase 2 Phase 2
PR6024Q02 The Sculpture Simple Multiple Choice Educational Continuous Description Integrate and interpret Phase 2 Phase 2
PR6024Q03 The Sculpture Simple Multiple Choice Educational Continuous Description Access and retrieve Phase 2 No
PR6024Q04 The Sculpture Constructed Response Expert Educational Continuous Description Reflect and evaluate Phase 2 Phase 2
PR6024Q05 The Sculpture Constructed Response Expert Educational Continuous Description Reflect and evaluate Phase 2 Phase 2
PR6024Q06 The Sculpture Constructed Response Expert Educational Continuous Description Integrate and interpret Phase 2 Phase 2
PR6024Q07 The Sculpture Simple Multiple Choice Educational Continuous Description Integrate and interpret Phase 2 No
PR6024Q08 The Sculpture Simple Multiple Choice Educational Continuous Description Integrate and interpret Phase 2 No
PR6024Q09 The Sculpture Constructed Response Expert Educational Continuous Description Reflect and evaluate Phase 2 No
PR6024Q10 The Sculpture Simple Multiple Choice Educational Continuous Description Integrate and interpret Phase 2 Phase 2
88
Unit Item
Code Unit Name Item Format 2012 Situation Text Format Text Type Aspect
Developed
for
Equating
Study
PR6025Q01 Welcome to America Simple Multiple Choice Personal Continuous Narration Integrate and interpret Phase 2 Phase 2
PR6025Q02 Welcome to America Simple Multiple Choice Personal Continuous Narration Reflect and evaluate Phase 2 No
PR6025Q03 Welcome to America Constructed Response Expert Personal Continuous Narration Integrate and interpret Phase 2 No
PR6025Q04 Welcome to America Simple Multiple Choice Personal Continuous Narration Integrate and interpret Phase 2 No
PR6025Q05 Welcome to America Simple Multiple Choice Personal Continuous Narration Integrate and interpret Phase 2 Phase 2
PR6025Q06 Welcome to America Simple Multiple Choice Personal Continuous Narration Integrate and interpret Phase 2 No
PR6025Q07 Welcome to America Constructed Response Expert Personal Continuous Narration Integrate and interpret Phase 2 Phase 2
PR6025Q08 Welcome to America Constructed Response Expert Personal Continuous Narration Integrate and interpret Phase 2 Phase 2
PR6025Q09 Welcome to America Simple Multiple Choice Personal Continuous Narration Integrate and interpret Phase 2 No
PR6025Q10 Welcome to America Simple Multiple Choice Personal Continuous Narration Reflect and evaluate Phase 2 Phase 2
PR6025Q11 Welcome to America Simple Multiple Choice Personal Continuous Narration Integrate and interpret Phase 2 No
PR6025Q12 Welcome to America Constructed Response Expert Personal Continuous Narration Reflect and evaluate Phase 2 No
PR6026Q01 Bus Timetable Simple Multiple Choice Public Non-continuous Description Access and retrieve Phase 2 No
PR6026Q02 Bus Timetable Complex Multiple Choice Public Non-continuous Description Access and retrieve Phase 2 Phase 2
89
Unit Item
Code Unit Name Item Format 2012 Situation Text Format Text Type Aspect
Developed
for
Equating
Study
PR6026Q03 Bus Timetable Constructed Response Expert Public Non-continuous Description Access and retrieve Phase 2 Phase 2
PR6026Q04 Bus Timetable Complex Multiple Choice Public Non-continuous Description Access and retrieve Phase 2 No
PR6026Q05 Bus Timetable Complex Multiple Choice Public Non-continuous Description Access and retrieve Phase 2 Phase 2
PR6026Q06 Bus Timetable Constructed Response Expert Public Non-continuous Description Access and retrieve Phase 2 No
PR6026Q07 Bus Timetable Simple Multiple Choice Public Non-continuous Description Access and retrieve Phase 2 No
PR6026Q08 Bus Timetable Constructed Response Expert Public Non-continuous Description Integrate and interpret Phase 2 No
PR6026Q09 Bus Timetable Constructed Response Expert Public Non-continuous Description Reflect and evaluate Phase 2 Phase 2
PR6026Q10 Bus Timetable Constructed Response Expert Public Non-continuous Description Integrate and interpret Phase 2 No
PR6027Q01 Underground Cooking Complex Multiple Choice Personal Non-continuous Instruction
Access and retrieve Phase 2 Phase 2
PR6027Q02 Underground Cooking Simple Multiple Choice Personal Non-continuous Instruction
Access and retrieve Phase 2 No
PR6027Q03 Underground Cooking Complex Multiple Choice Personal Non-continuous Instruction
Integrate and interpret Phase 2 Phase 2
PR6027Q04 Underground Cooking Simple Multiple Choice Personal Non-continuous Instruction
Access and retrieve Phase 2 Phase 2
PR6027Q05 Underground Cooking Constructed Response Expert Personal Non-continuous Instruction
Reflect and evaluate Phase 2 No
PR6027Q06 Underground Cooking Simple Multiple Choice Personal Non-continuous Instruction
Integrate and interpret Phase 2 Phase 2
90
Unit Item
Code Unit Name Item Format 2012 Situation Text Format Text Type Aspect
Developed
for
Equating
Study
PR6027Q07 Underground Cooking Simple Multiple Choice Personal Non-continuous Instruction
Access and retrieve Phase 2 Phase 2
PR6027Q08 Underground Cooking Constructed Response Expert Personal Non-continuous Instruction
Access and retrieve Phase 2 No
PR6027Q09 Underground Cooking Constructed Response Expert Personal Non-continuous Instruction
Reflect and evaluate Phase 2 No
PR6027Q10 Underground Cooking Constructed Response Expert Personal Non-continuous Instruction
Integrate and interpret Phase 2 Phase 2
91
Science
Unit Item
Code Unit Name Item Format 2012 Application Area
Context
setting
area Competency
Knowledge
Of Science
Knowledge
About
Science
Developed
for
Equating
Study
PS7000Q01 Oily birds Simple Multiple Choice Environment Social
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Physical systems N.A. Phase 1
Phase 1 & 2
PS7000Q02 Oily birds Complex Multiple Choice Environment Social
Using scientific evidence N.A.
Scientific enquiry Phase 1
Phase 1 & 2
PS7000Q03 Oily birds Simple Multiple Choice
Frontiers of science and technology Social
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Physical systems N.A. Phase 1 No
PS7000Q04 Oily birds Constructed Response Expert Environment Social
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Physical systems N.A. Phase 1
Phase 1 & 2
PS7000Q05 Oily birds Constructed Response Expert Environment Social
Identifying scientific issues N.A.
Scientific enquiry Phase 1 Phase 1
PS7000Q06 Oily birds Simple Multiple Choice Environment Social
Using scientific evidence N.A.
Scientific explanations Phase 1 No
PS7001Q01 Washing clothes Constructed Response Expert
Frontiers of science and technology Social
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Technological systems N.A. Phase 1 No
PS7001Q02 Washing clothes Constructed Response Expert
Frontiers of science and technology Social
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Physical systems N.A. Phase 1 No
PS7001Q03 Washing clothes Simple Multiple Choice
Frontiers of science and technology Global
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Physical systems N.A. Phase 1 No
PS7002Q01 Cooking Simple Multiple Choice Natural resources Personal
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Physical systems N.A. Phase 1 No
PS7002Q02 Cooking Complex Multiple Choice Natural resources Global
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Physical systems N.A. Phase 1 Phase 1
PS7002Q03 Cooking Constructed Response Expert Environment Global
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Earth and Space systems N.A. Phase 1
Phase 1 & 2
92
Unit Item
Code Unit Name Item Format 2012 Application Area
Context
setting
area Competency
Knowledge
Of Science
Knowledge
About
Science
Developed
for
Equating
Study
PS7002Q04 Cooking Simple Multiple Choice Natural resources Social
Using scientific evidence N.A.
Scientific explanations Phase 1
Phase 1 & 2
PS7002Q05 Cooking Simple Multiple Choice Natural resources Social
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Physical systems N.A. Phase 1 No
PS7004Q01 Mortality rates Constructed Response Manual Health Global
Using scientific evidence N.A.
Scientific explanations Phase 1 Phase 1
PS7004Q02 Mortality rates Simple Multiple Choice Health Social
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Living systems N.A. Phase 1 No
PS7004Q03 Mortality rates Constructed Response Expert Health Social
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Living systems N.A. Phase 1 No
PS7005Q01 Lungs over gills Complex Multiple Choice
Frontiers of science and technology Global
Using scientific evidence N.A.
Scientific explanations Phase 1 No
PS7005Q02 Lungs over gills Simple Multiple Choice
Frontiers of science and technology Personal
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Living systems N.A. Phase 1 No
PS7006Q01 Osteoporosis Constructed Response Expert Health Personal
Using scientific evidence N.A.
Scientific explanations Phase 1
Phase 1 & 2
PS7006Q02 Osteoporosis Constructed Response Expert Health Personal
Using scientific evidence N.A.
Scientific explanations Phase 1
Phase 1 & 2
PS7006Q03 Osteoporosis Simple Multiple Choice Health Global
Using scientific evidence N.A.
Scientific explanations Phase 1 Phase 1
PS7007Q01 Extreme survival Simple Multiple Choice Health Social
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Physical systems N.A. Phase 1 No
PS7007Q02 Extreme survival Simple Multiple Choice Health Social
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Physical systems N.A. Phase 1 No
PS7007Q03 Extreme survival Constructed Response Expert Health Global
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Physical systems N.A. Phase 1 No
93
Unit Item
Code Unit Name Item Format 2012 Application Area
Context
setting
area Competency
Knowledge
Of Science
Knowledge
About
Science
Developed
for
Equating
Study
PS7007Q04 Extreme survival Simple Multiple Choice Natural resources Global
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Physical systems N.A. Phase 1 No
PS7007Q05 Extreme survival Simple Multiple Choice Hazard Global
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Living systems N.A. Phase 1 No
PS7008Q01 Reverse osmosis Simple Multiple Choice
Frontiers of science and technology Social
Using scientific evidence N.A.
Scientific explanations Phase 1 Phase 1
PS7008Q02 Reverse osmosis Simple Multiple Choice
Frontiers of science and technology Global
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Physical systems N.A. Phase 1 Phase 1
PS7008Q03 Reverse osmosis Constructed Response Expert
Frontiers of science and technology Social
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Physical systems N.A. Phase 1 Phase 1
PS7008Q04 Reverse osmosis Simple Multiple Choice
Frontiers of science and technology Social
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Physical systems N.A. Phase 1 No
PS7008Q05 Reverse osmosis Constructed Response Expert environment Global
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Technological systems N.A. Phase 1 Phase 1
PS7009Q01 Fish and tides Simple Multiple Choice
Frontiers of science and technology Global
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Earth and Space systems N.A. Phase 1 Phase 1
PS7009Q02 Fish and tides Complex Multiple Choice
Frontiers of science and technology Personal
Using scientific evidence N.A.
Scientific explanations Phase 1 Phase 1
PS7009Q03 Fish and tides Constructed Response Expert Natural resources Social
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Earth and Space systems N.A. Phase 1 Phase 1
PS7009Q04 Fish and tides Constructed Response Expert Natural resources Social
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Earth and Space systems N.A. Phase 1 Phase 1
PS7010Q01 Elephant species Simple Multiple Choice Environment Global
Using scientific evidence N.A.
Scientific explanations Phase 1 No
94
Unit Item
Code Unit Name Item Format 2012 Application Area
Context
setting
area Competency
Knowledge
Of Science
Knowledge
About
Science
Developed
for
Equating
Study
PS7010Q02 Elephant species Complex Multiple Choice Environment Global
Using scientific evidence N.A.
Scientific explanations Phase 1 Phase 1
PS7010Q03 Elephant species Constructed Response Expert Environment Social
Identifying scientific issues N.A.
Scientific enquiry Phase 1 No
PS7010Q04(a) Elephant species Simple Multiple Choice Environment Global
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Living systems N.A. Phase 1 Phase 1
PS7010Q04(b) Elephant species Constructed Response Expert Environment Global
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Living systems N.A. Phase 1 Phase 1
PS7010Q05(a) Elephant species Constructed Response Expert Environment Global
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Living systems N.A. Phase 1 No
PS7010Q05(b) Elephant species Constructed Response Expert Environment Global
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Living systems N.A. Phase 1 No
PS7012Q01 First aid Simple Multiple Choice Health Personal
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Living systems N.A. Phase 1
Phase 1 & 2
PS7012Q02 First aid Complex Multiple Choice Health Personal
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Physical systems N.A. Phase 1
Phase 1 & 2
PS7012Q03 First Aid Constructed Response Expert Health Personal
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Living systems N.A. Phase 1
Phase 1 & 2
PS7012Q04 First aid Complex Multiple Choice Health Personal
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Living systems N.A. Phase 1 Phase 1
PS7013Q01 Ocean currents Simple Multiple Choice
Frontiers of science and technology Global
Using scientific evidence N.A.
Scientific explanations Phase 1
Phase 1 & 2
PS7013Q02 Ocean currents Constructed Response Expert Hazard Social
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Earth and Space systems N.A. Phase 1
Phase 1 & 2
PS7013Q03 Ocean currents Complex Multiple Choice
Frontiers of science and technology Personal
Identifying scientific issues N.A.
Scientific enquiry Phase 1 No
95
Unit Item
Code Unit Name Item Format 2012 Application Area
Context
setting
area Competency
Knowledge
Of Science
Knowledge
About
Science
Developed
for
Equating
Study
PS7013Q04 Ocean currents Simple Multiple Choice
Frontiers of science and technology Global
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Earth and Space systems N.A. Phase 1 No
PS7014Q01 Oil spills Constructed Response Expert Hazard Social
Using scientific evidence
Technological systems N.A. Phase 1
Phase 1 & 2
PS7014Q02 Oil spills Complex Multiple Choice Hazard Global
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Living systems N.A. Phase 1 No
PS7014Q03 Oil spills Constructed Response Expert Health Social
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Living systems N.A. Phase 1
Phase 1 & 2
PS7014Q04 Oil spills Constructed Response Expert Environment Personal
Identifying scientific issues N.A.
Scientific enquiry Phase 1
Phase 1 & 2
PS7014Q05 Oil spills Simple Multiple Choice
Frontiers of science and technology Global
Identifying scientific issues
Technological systems N.A. Phase 1 No
PS7014Q06 Oil spills Simple Multiple Choice Hazard Social
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Earth and Space systems N.A. Phase 1 No
PS7015Q01 Cassowaries Complex Multiple Choice Environment Social
Using scientific evidence N.A.
Scientific explanations Phase 1 Phase 1
PS7015Q02 Cassowaries Constructed Response Expert Environment Social
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Living systems N.A. Phase 1 Phase 1
PS7015Q03 Cassowaries Complex Multiple Choice Environment Social
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Living systems N.A. Phase 1 Phase 1
PS7015Q04 Cassowaries Simple Multiple Choice Environment Social
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Living systems N.A. Phase 1 Phase 1
PS7016Q01(a) Oil Leak Simple Multiple Choice Environment Social
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Physical systems N.A. Phase 1 No
96
Unit Item
Code Unit Name Item Format 2012 Application Area
Context
setting
area Competency
Knowledge
Of Science
Knowledge
About
Science
Developed
for
Equating
Study
PS7016Q01(b) Oil Leak Constructed Response Expert Environment Social
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Physical systems N.A. Phase 1 No
PS7016Q02 Oil Leak Simple Multiple Choice Environment Social
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Living systems N.A. Phase 1 No
PS7016Q03 Oil Leak Simple Multiple Choice Environment Social
Identifying scientific issues N.A.
Scientific enquiry Phase 1 No
PS7016Q04(a) Oil Leak Simple Multiple Choice Environment Social
Using scientific evidence N.A.
Scientific explanations Phase 1 No
PS7016Q04(b) Oil Leak Constructed Response Expert Environment Social
Using scientific evidence N.A.
Scientific explanations Phase 1 No
PS7017Q01 Galileo's clock Simple Multiple Choice
Frontiers of science and technology Personal
Identifying scientific issues N.A.
Scientific enquiry Phase 1 Phase 1
PS7017Q02 Galileo's clock Simple Multiple Choice
Frontiers of science and technology Personal
Identifying scientific issues N.A.
Scientific enquiry Phase 1 No
PS7017Q03 Galileo's clock Simple Multiple Choice
Frontiers of science and technology Personal
Identifying scientific issues N.A.
Scientific enquiry Phase 1
Phase 1 & 2
PS7017Q04 Galileo's clock Constructed Response Expert
Frontiers of science and technology Personal
Identifying scientific issues N.A.
Scientific enquiry Phase 1
Phase 1 & 2
PS7017Q05 Galileo's clock Complex Multiple Choice
Frontiers of science and technology Social
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Technological systems N.A. Phase 1 Phase 1
PS7018Q01 Watering cattle Simple Multiple Choice
Frontiers of science and technology Social
Using scientific evidence
Technological systems N.A. Phase 1 No
PS7018Q02 Watering cattle Simple Multiple Choice
Frontiers of science and technology Personal
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Physical systems N.A. Phase 1 No
PS7018Q03 Watering cattle Simple Multiple Choice
Frontiers of science and technology Personal
Using scientific evidence N.A.
Scientific explanations Phase 1
Phase 1 & 2
97
Unit Item
Code Unit Name Item Format 2012 Application Area
Context
setting
area Competency
Knowledge
Of Science
Knowledge
About
Science
Developed
for
Equating
Study
PS7018Q04 Watering cattle Complex Multiple Choice
Frontiers of science and technology Personal
Using scientific evidence N.A.
Scientific explanations Phase 1 Phase 1
PS7019Q01 Blood fats Simple Multiple Choice Health Social
Identifying scientific issues N.A.
Scientific enquiry Phase 1 Phase 1
PS7019Q02 Blood fats Simple Multiple Choice Health Social
Identifying scientific issues N.A.
Scientific enquiry Phase 1 Phase 1
PS7019Q03 Blood fats Complex Multiple Choice Health Social
Using scientific evidence N.A.
Scientific explanations Phase 1 No
PS7019Q04 Blood fats Simple Multiple Choice Health Personal
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Living systems N.A. Phase 1 No
PS7020Q01 Stone pots Complex Multiple Choice Natural resources Social
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Earth and Space systems N.A. Phase 1 No
PS7020Q02 Stone pots Simple Multiple Choice Natural resources Social
Using scientific evidence
Technological systems N.A. Phase 1 No
PS7020Q03 Stone pots Simple Multiple Choice Natural resources Social
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Physical systems N.A. Phase 1
Phase 1 & 2
PS7020Q04 Stone pots Constructed Response Expert Natural resources Social
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Physical systems N.A. Phase 1 Phase 1
PS7021Q01 Sterilised milk Simple Multiple Choice Health Social
Identifying scientific issues N.A.
Scientific enquiry Phase 1 No
PS7021Q02 Sterilised milk Complex Multiple Choice Health Social
Identifying scientific issues N.A.
Scientific enquiry Phase 1
Phase 1 & 2
PS7021Q03 Sterilised milk Simple Multiple Choice Health Personal
Identifying scientific issues N.A.
Scientific enquiry Phase 1 No
PS7021Q04 Sterilised milk Complex Multiple Choice
Environment Social
Identifying scientific issues N.A.
Scientific enquiry Phase 1
Phase 1 & 2
98
Unit Item
Code Unit Name Item Format 2012 Application Area
Context
setting
area Competency
Knowledge
Of Science
Knowledge
About
Science
Developed
for
Equating
Study
PS7022Q01 Flood hazard Complex Multiple Choice Hazard Global
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Earth and Space systems N.A. Phase 1 Phase 1
PS7022Q02 Flood hazard Constructed Response Expert Hazard Global
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Earth and Space systems N.A. Phase 1 Phase 1
PS7022Q03 Flood hazard Constructed Response Expert Hazard Social
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Earth and Space systems N.A. Phase 1 No
PS7023Q01 Cholera Complex Multiple Choice Health Social
Using scientific evidence N.A.
Scientific explanations Phase 1
Phase 1 & 2
PS7023Q02 Cholera Complex Multiple Choice Health Personal
Identifying scientific issues N.A.
Scientific enquiry Phase 1 Phase 1
PS7023Q03 Cholera Simple Multiple Choice Health Social
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Living systems N.A. Phase 1 No
PS7201Q01 Water Purification
Constructed Response Expert
Hazard Social Using scientific evidence N.A.
Scientific explanations Phase 2 Phase 2
PS7201Q02 Water Purification
Simple Multiple Choice
Health Social Identifying scientific issues N.A.
Scientific enquiry Phase 2 Phase 2
PS7201Q03 Water Purification
Constructed Response Expert
Hazard Social Using scientific evidence N.A.
Scientific explanations Phase 2 Phase 2
PS7202Q01 Crystal radios
Complex Multiple Choice Hazard Personal
Identifying scientific issues N.A.
Scientific enquiry Phase 2 No
PS7202Q02 Crystal radios
Constructed Response Expert
Frontiers of science and technology Personal
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Physical systems N.A. Phase 2 No
PS7202Q03 Crystal radios
Simple Multiple Choice
Frontiers of science and technology Global
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Physical systems N.A. Phase 2 No
99
Unit Item
Code Unit Name Item Format 2012 Application Area
Context
setting
area Competency
Knowledge
Of Science
Knowledge
About
Science
Developed
for
Equating
Study
PS7202Q04 Crystal radios
Complex Multiple Choice
Frontiers of science and technology Personal
Using scientific evidence N.A.
Scientific explanations Phase 2 No
PS7202Q05 Crystal radios
Complex Multiple Choice
Frontiers of science and technology Personal
Identifying scientific issues N.A.
Scientific enquiry Phase 2 No
PS7202Q06 Crystal radios
Constructed Response Expert Hazard Personal
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Physical systems N.A. Phase 2 No
PS7203Q01 Living on Mars Constructed Response Expert
Frontiers of science and technology
Global Using scientific evidence N.A.
Scientific explanations Phase 2 Phase 2
PS7203Q02 Living on Mars Complex Multiple Choice
Frontiers of science and technology Personal
Using scientific evidence N.A.
Scientific explanations Phase 2 No
PS7203Q03 Living on Mars
Complex Multiple Choice
Frontiers of science and technology
Global Explaining phenomena scientifically
Earth and Space systems N.A. Phase 2 Phase 2
PS7203Q04 Living on Mars Constructed Response Expert Health Personal
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Living systems N.A. Phase 2 No
PS7203Q05 Living on Mars Simple Multiple Choice
Frontiers of science and technology
Global Using scientific evidence N.A.
Scientific explanations Phase 2 Phase 2
PS7203Q06 Living on Mars Simple Multiple Choice
Frontiers of science and technology Global
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Living systems N.A. Phase 2 No
PS7204Q01 Mobile phones Constructed Response Expert Hazard Personal
Using scientific evidence N.A.
Scientific explanations Phase 2 No
PS7204Q02 Mobile phones Simple Multiple Choice Health Social
Using scientific evidence N.A.
Scientific explanations Phase 2 No
PS7204Q03 Mobile phones Simple Multiple Choice Health Social
Identifying scientific issues N.A.
Scientific enquiry Phase 2 No
PS7204Q04 Mobile phones Constructed Response Expert
Frontiers of science and technology Social
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Technological systems N.A. Phase 2 No
100
Unit Item
Code Unit Name Item Format 2012 Application Area
Context
setting
area Competency
Knowledge
Of Science
Knowledge
About
Science
Developed
for
Equating
Study
PS7204Q05 Mobile phones Complex Multiple Choice Hazard Social
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Physical systems N.A. Phase 2 No
PS7205Q01 Plate Tectonics
Constructed Response Manual
Frontiers of science and technology Global
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Earth and Space systems N.A. Phase 2 No
PS7205Q02 Plate Tectonics
Simple Multiple Choice
Hazard Global Using scientific evidence
Earth and Space systems N.A. Phase 2 Phase 2
PS7205Q03 Plate Tectonics Simple Multiple Choice
Frontiers of science and technology
Global Identifying scientific issues N.A.
Scientific enquiry Phase 2 Phase 2
PS7205Q04 Plate Tectonics
Constructed Response Expert
Hazard Global Explaining phenomena scientifically
Earth and Space systems N.A. Phase 2 Phase 2
PS7205Q05 Plate Tectonics
Simple Multiple Choice
Hazard Global Explaining phenomena scientifically
Earth and Space systems N.A. Phase 2 No
PS7205Q06 Plate Tectonics Complex Multiple Choice
Frontiers of science and technology Global
Using scientific evidence N.A.
Scientific explanations Phase 2 No
PS7206Q01 Nuclear power
Simple Multiple Choice
Frontiers of science and technology Social
Using scientific evidence N.A.
Scientific explanations Phase 2 No
PS7206Q02 Nuclear power
Complex Multiple Choice Natural resources Social
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Physical systems N.A. Phase 2 No
PS7206Q03 Nuclear power
Simple Multiple Choice Hazard Social
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Physical systems N.A. Phase 2 No
PS7206Q04 Nuclear power
Constructed Response Expert
Hazard Global Explaining phenomena scientifically
Earth and Space systems N.A. Phase 2 No
101
Unit Item
Code Unit Name Item Format 2012 Application Area
Context
setting
area Competency
Knowledge
Of Science
Knowledge
About
Science
Developed
for
Equating
Study
PS7207Q01 Alkaline water
Complex Multiple Choice Health Personal
Using scientific evidence N.A.
Scientific explanations Phase 2 No
PS7207Q02 Alkaline water
Complex Multiple Choice Health Personal
Using scientific evidence N.A.
Scientific explanations Phase 2 No
PS7207Q03 Alkaline water
Simple Multiple Choice Health Personal
Using scientific evidence N.A.
Scientific explanations Phase 2 No
PS7207Q04 Alkaline water
Complex Multiple Choice Health Personal
Identifying scientific issues N.A.
Scientific enquiry Phase 2 No
PS7207Q05 Alkaline water
Constructed Response Expert Health Personal
Identifying scientific issues N.A.
Scientific enquiry Phase 2 No
PS7208Q01 Identifying Substances
Simple Multiple Choice
Frontiers of science and technology
Personal Using scientific evidence
Physical systems N.A. Phase 2 Phase 2
PS7208Q02 Identifying Substances
Constructed Response Expert
Frontiers of science and technology
Personal Identifying scientific issues N.A.
Scientific enquiry Phase 2 Phase 2
PS7208Q03 Identifying Substances
Constructed Response Expert
Frontiers of science and technology
Personal Using scientific evidence N.A.
Scientific explanations Phase 2 Phase 2
PS7208Q04 Identifying Substances
Complex Multiple Choice
Frontiers of science and technology Personal
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Physical systems N.A. Phase 2 No
PS7209Q01 Floating Simple Multiple Choice
Frontiers of science and technology
Social Explaining phenomena scientifically
Physical systems N.A. Phase 2 Phase 2
PS7209Q02 Floating Constructed Response Manual
Frontiers of science and technology
Global Explaining phenomena scientifically
Physical systems N.A. Phase 2 Phase 2
PS7209Q03 Floating Constructed Response Expert
Frontiers of science and technology
Personal Explaining phenomena scientifically
Physical systems N.A. Phase 2 Phase 2
PS7209Q04 Floating Constructed Response Expert
Frontiers of science and technology Personal
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Physical systems N.A. Phase 2 No
102
Unit Item
Code Unit Name Item Format 2012 Application Area
Context
setting
area Competency
Knowledge
Of Science
Knowledge
About
Science
Developed
for
Equating
Study
PS7210Q01 MP3 Constructed Response Expert
Frontiers of science and technology Personal
Using scientific evidence
Technological systems N.A. Phase 2 No
PS7210Q02 MP3 Simple Multiple Choice
Frontiers of science and technology Personal
Using scientific evidence N.A.
Scientific explanations Phase 2 No
PS7210Q03 MP3 Constructed Response Expert
Frontiers of science and technology Personal
Using scientific evidence N.A.
Scientific explanations Phase 2 No
PS7210Q04 MP3 Constructed Response Expert
Frontiers of science and technology Personal
Using scientific evidence N.A.
Scientific explanations Phase 2 No
PS7210Q05 MP3 Constructed Response Expert
Frontiers of science and technology Personal
Identifying scientific issues N.A.
Scientific enquiry Phase 2 No
PS7210Q06 MP3 Constructed Response Expert
Frontiers of science and technology Personal
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Technological systems N.A. Phase 2 No
PS7211Q01 Ceramics
Constructed Response Expert
Natural resources Global Explaining phenomena scientifically
Physical systems N.A. Phase 2 Phase 2
PS7211Q02 Ceramics
Complex Multiple Choice
Frontiers of science and technology
Social Using scientific evidence N.A.
Scientific explanations Phase 2 Phase 2
PS7211Q03 Ceramics
Constructed Response Expert
Frontiers of science and technology Social
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Physical systems N.A. Phase 2 No
PS7211Q04 Ceramics
Constructed Response Expert
Frontiers of science and technology
Social Identifying scientific issues N.A.
Scientific enquiry Phase 2 Phase 2
PS7212Q01 Nitrogen in Rocks
Constructed Response Expert
Natural resources Global Explaining phenomena scientifically
Living systems N.A. Phase 2 Phase 2
PS7212Q02
Nitrogen in Rocks
Simple Multiple Choice
Natural resources Global Explaining phenomena scientifically
Earth and Space systems N.A. Phase 2 Phase 2
PS7212Q03 Nitrogen in Rocks
Simple Multiple Choice Natural resources Global
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Living systems N.A. Phase 2 No
103
Unit Item
Code Unit Name Item Format 2012 Application Area
Context
setting
area Competency
Knowledge
Of Science
Knowledge
About
Science
Developed
for
Equating
Study
PS7212Q04 Nitrogen in Rocks
Constructed Response Expert
Natural resources Global Identifying scientific issues N.A.
Scientific enquiry Phase 2 Phase 2
PS7213Q01 Fuel cells
Simple Multiple Choice
Frontiers of science and technology Global
Using scientific evidence N.A.
Scientific explanations Phase 2 No
PS7213Q02 Fuel cells
Simple Multiple Choice
Frontiers of science and technology Global
Using scientific evidence N.A.
Scientific explanations Phase 2 No
PS7213Q03 Fuel cells
Complex Multiple Choice Environment Global
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Physical systems N.A. Phase 2 No
PS7213Q04 Fuel cells
Constructed Response Expert
Frontiers of science and technology Social
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Physical systems N.A. Phase 2 No
PS7213Q05 Fuel cells
Constructed Response Expert
Frontiers of science and technology Global
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Physical systems N.A. Phase 2 No
PS7214Q01 Malaria
Simple Multiple Choice Health Social
Using scientific evidence N.A.
Scientific explanations Phase 2 No
PS7214Q02 Malaria
Complex Multiple Choice Health Social
Using scientific evidence N.A.
Scientific explanations Phase 2 No
PS7214Q03 Malaria
Constructed Response Expert Environment Global
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Living systems N.A. Phase 2 No
PS7214Q04 Malaria
Constructed Response Expert Health Social
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Technological systems N.A. Phase 2 No
PS7215Q01 Blood Clotting
Simple Multiple Choice
Health Personal Using scientific evidence N.A.
Scientific explanations Phase 2 Phase 2
PS7215Q02 Blood Clotting
Constructed Response Expert
Health Personal Explaining phenomena scientifically
Living systems N.A. Phase 2 Phase 2
PS7215Q03 Blood Clotting
Constructed Response Expert
Health Social Explaining phenomena scientifically
Living systems N.A. Phase 2 Phase 2
104
Unit Item
Code Unit Name Item Format 2012 Application Area
Context
setting
area Competency
Knowledge
Of Science
Knowledge
About
Science
Developed
for
Equating
Study
PS7216Q01 Fish Management
Simple Multiple Choice
Natural resources Global Explaining phenomena scientifically
Living systems N.A. Phase 2 Phase 2
PS7216Q02 Fish Management
Complex Multiple Choice
Natural resources Global Identifying scientific issues N.A.
Scientific enquiry Phase 2 Phase 2
PS7216Q03 Fish Management
Constructed Response Expert
Natural resources Global Using scientific evidence N.A.
Scientific explanations Phase 2 Phase 2
PS7217Q01 Ocean Debris
Complex Multiple Choice
Environment Social Explaining phenomena scientifically
Technological systems N.A. Phase 2 Phase 2
PS7217Q02 Ocean Debris
Constructed Response Expert
Environment Global Explaining phenomena scientifically
Physical systems N.A. Phase 2 Phase 2
PS7217Q03 Ocean Debris
Complex Multiple Choice
Environment Global Explaining phenomena scientifically
Earth and Space systems N.A. Phase 2 Phase 2
PS7217Q04 Ocean Debris
Simple Multiple Choice
Environment Global Explaining phenomena scientifically
Earth and Space systems N.A. Phase 2 No
PS7218Q01 Underground Cooling
Complex Multiple Choice
Hazard Social Explaining phenomena scientifically
Physical systems N.A. Phase 2 Phase 2
PS7218Q02 Underground Cooling
Constructed Response Expert
Hazard Social Explaining phenomena scientifically
Physical systems N.A. Phase 2 Phase 2
PS7218Q03 Underground Cooling
Simple Multiple Choice
Frontiers of science and technology
Social Explaining phenomena scientifically
Technological systems N.A. Phase 2 Phase 2
PS7218Q04 Underground Cooling
Simple Multiple Choice
Frontiers of science and technology Social
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Technological systems N.A. Phase 2 No
PS7219Q01 Hydroponics
Simple Multiple Choice
Natural resources Social Explaining phenomena scientifically
Living systems N.A. Phase 2 Phase 2
105
Unit Item
Code Unit Name Item Format 2012 Application Area
Context
setting
area Competency
Knowledge
Of Science
Knowledge
About
Science
Developed
for
Equating
Study
PS7219Q02 Hydroponics
Complex Multiple Choice
Natural resources Social Explaining phenomena scientifically
Living systems N.A. Phase 2 Phase 2
PS7219Q03 Hydroponics
Complex Multiple Choice
Natural resources Social Identifying scientific issues N.A.
Scientific enquiry Phase 2 Phase 2
PS7219Q04 Hydroponics
Simple Multiple Choice
Environment Social Explaining phenomena scientifically
Living systems N.A. Phase 2 Phase 2
PS7220Q01 Natural Gas
Simple Multiple Choice
Hazard Social Explaining phenomena scientifically
Technological systems N.A. Phase 2 Phase 2
PS7220Q02 Natural Gas
Complex Multiple Choice
Environment Social Identifying scientific issues N.A.
Scientific enquiry Phase 2 Phase 2
PS7220Q03 Natural Gas
Simple Multiple Choice
Natural resources Social Identifying scientific issues N.A.
Scientific enquiry Phase 2 Phase 2
PS7221Q01 Clean Drinking Water
Simple Multiple Choice
Health Personal Explaining phenomena scientifically
Living systems N.A. Phase 2 Phase 2
PS7221Q02 Clean Drinking Water
Constructed Response Expert
Frontiers of science and technology
Social Explaining phenomena scientifically
Technological systems N.A. Phase 2 Phase 2
PS7221Q03 Clean Drinking Water
Complex Multiple Choice
Health Personal Explaining phenomena scientifically
Technological systems N.A. Phase 2 Phase 2
PS7221Q04 Clean Drinking Water
Simple Multiple Choice
Health Social Explaining phenomena scientifically
Living systems N.A. Phase 2 Phase 2
PS7221Q05 Clean Drinking Water
Complex Multiple Choice Health Social
Identifying scientific issues
Technological systems N.A. Phase 2 No
PS7222Q01 Texan Summer Simple Multiple Choice
Environment Social Identifying scientific issues N.A.
Scientific enquiry Phase 2 Phase 2
PS7222Q02 Texan Summer Complex Multiple Choice
Environment Global Using scientific evidence N.A.
Scientific explanations Phase 2 Phase 2
106
Unit Item
Code Unit Name Item Format 2012 Application Area
Context
setting
area Competency
Knowledge
Of Science
Knowledge
About
Science
Developed
for
Equating
Study
PS7222Q03 Texan Summer Complex Multiple Choice
Environment Global Using scientific evidence N.A.
Scientific explanations Phase 2 Phase 2
PS7222Q04 Texan Summer
Complex Multiple Choice
Environment Global Explaining phenomena scientifically
Earth and Space systems N.A. Phase 2 Phase 2
PS7223Q01 Car Tyres Simple Multiple Choice
Frontiers of science and technology Global
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Physical systems N.A. Phase 2 No
PS7223Q02 Car Tyres Constructed Response Expert
Frontiers of science and technology Global
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Physical systems N.A. Phase 2 No
PS7223Q03 Car Tyres Constructed Response Expert
Frontiers of science and technology Global
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Physical systems N.A. Phase 2 No
PS7224Q01 Moon Rock Simple Multiple Choice
Frontiers of science and technology
Global Using scientific evidence N.A.
Scientific explanations Phase 2 Phase 2
PS7224Q02 Moon Rock Complex Multiple Choice
Frontiers of science and technology
Global Using scientific evidence N.A.
Scientific explanations Phase 2 Phase 2
PS7224Q03 Moon Rock
Simple Multiple Choice
Natural resources Global Explaining phenomena scientifically
Earth and Space systems N.A. Phase 2 Phase 2
PS7224Q04 Moon Rock
Simple Multiple Choice
Frontiers of science and technology Global
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Earth and Space systems N.A. Phase 2 No
PS7224Q05 Moon Rock Simple Multiple Choice
Natural resources Global Identifying scientific issues N.A.
Scientific enquiry Phase 2 Phase 2
PS7225Q01 BRICKS Constructed Response Expert Natural resources Social
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Physical systems N.A. Phase 2 No
PS7225Q02 BRICKS Complex Multiple Choice Natural resources Social
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Physical systems N.A. Phase 2 No
107
Unit Item
Code Unit Name Item Format 2012 Application Area
Context
setting
area Competency
Knowledge
Of Science
Knowledge
About
Science
Developed
for
Equating
Study
PS7225Q03 BRICKS Simple Multiple Choice
Frontiers of science and technology Global
Using scientific evidence N.A.
Scientific enquiry Phase 2 No
PS7228Q01 C-Dating Simple Multiple Choice
Frontiers of science and technology
Social Identifying scientific issues N.A.
Scientific enquiry Phase 2 Phase 2
PS7228Q02 C-Dating Constructed Response Expert
Frontiers of science and technology
Global Using scientific evidence N.A.
Scientific explanations Phase 2 Phase 2
PS7228Q03 C-Dating Constructed Response Expert
Frontiers of science and technology
Global Using scientific evidence N.A.
Scientific explanations Phase 2 Phase 2
PS7228Q04 C-Dating Simple Multiple Choice
Frontiers of science and technology
Personal Using scientific evidence N.A.
Scientific explanations Phase 2 Phase 2
PS7228Q05 C-Dating Constructed Response Expert
Frontiers of science and technology Global
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Physical systems N.A. Phase 2 No
PS7228Q06 C-Dating Simple Multiple Choice
Frontiers of science and technology Global
Using scientific evidence N.A.
Scientific enquiry Phase 2 No
PS7229Q01 Exploring the Ocean
Simple Multiple Choice
Frontiers of science and technology
Global Explaining phenomena scientifically
Physical systems N.A. Phase 2 Phase 2
PS7229Q02 Exploring the Ocean
Simple Multiple Choice
Environment Global Explaining phenomena scientifically
Earth and Space systems N.A. Phase 2 Phase 2
PS7229Q03 Exploring the Ocean
Complex Multiple Choice
Hazard Global Explaining phenomena scientifically
Earth and Space systems N.A. Phase 2 Phase 2
PS7230Q01 Pesticides Complex Multiple
Choice Hazard Social Using scientific evidence N.A.
Scientific explanations Phase 2 No
PS7230Q02 Pesticides Complex Multiple
Choice Hazard Social
Using scientific evidence N.A.
Scientific explanations Phase 2 Phase 2
108
Unit Item
Code Unit Name Item Format 2012 Application Area
Context
setting
area Competency
Knowledge
Of Science
Knowledge
About
Science
Developed
for
Equating
Study
PS7230Q03 Pesticides Complex Multiple
Choice Hazard Social
Identifying scientific issues N.A.
Scientific enquiry Phase 2 Phase 2
PS7230Q04 Pesticides Complex Multiple
Choice Natural resources Social
Identifying scientific issues N.A.
Scientific enquiry Phase 2 Phase 2
PS7230Q05 Pesticides Complex Multiple
Choice Natural resources Social Explaining phenomena scientifically
Living systems N.A. Phase 2 No
PS7231Q01 Pollen Allergy Complex Multiple Choice
Health Social Using scientific evidence N.A.
Scientific explanations Phase 2 Phase 2
PS7231Q02 Pollen Allergy Simple Multiple Choice Health Social
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Living systems N.A. Phase 2 No
PS7231Q03 Pollen Allergy Simple Multiple Choice Health Social
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Technological systems N.A. Phase 2 No
PS7231Q04 Pollen Allergy Complex Multiple Choice
Health Social Identifying scientific issues N.A.
Scientific enquiry Phase 2 Phase 2
PS7232Q01 Water-logged soil
Complex Multiple Choice
Natural resources Personal Identifying scientific issues N.A.
Scientific enquiry Phase 2 No
PS7232Q02 Water-logged soil
Complex Multiple Choice
Natural resources Social
Using scientific evidence N.A.
Scientific enquiry Phase 2 No
PS7232Q03 Water-logged soil
Complex Multiple Choice
Natural resources Social Explaining phenomena scientifically N.A.
Scientific explanations Phase 2 No
PS7233Q01 Sunlight Simple Multiple Choice
Frontiers of science and technology Global
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Physical systems N.A. Phase 2 No
PS7233Q02 Sunlight Complex Multiple Choice Hazard Social
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Physical systems N.A. Phase 2 No
PS7233Q03 Sunlight
Simple Multiple Choice
Frontiers of science and technology Global
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Earth and Space systems N.A. Phase 2 No
109
110
Appendix 2: PBT Critical friends
Name Domain Role in PISA
Rodger Bybee Science Chair Science Expert Group, PISA 2006-9; Critical Friend for science, 2012
John Dossey Mathematics Mathematics Expert Group member, PISA 2000-2012, Problem Solving Expert Group member, PISA 2003-2012
Irwin Kirsch Reading Chair Reading Expert Group, PISA 2000-2009; Educational Testing Service (ETS) – PISA Consortium member 2000-2006, Critical Friend for reading, 2012
Stan Jones Reading Reading Expert Group member, PISA 2000; Financial Literacy Expert Group member, PISA 2012
Kees Lagerwaard Mathematics Mathematics test developer, PISA 2000-2012, CitoGroup – PISA Consortium member 2000-2006)
Rolf Olsen Science Science test development coordinator, Institutt for Lærerutdanning og Skoleutvikling (ILS) – PISA Consortium member 2000-2012, mathematics test developer, PISA 2012
Jean-Francois Rouet Reading Reading Expert Group member, PISA 2009; Critical Friend for reading, 2012.
111
Appendix 3: Item Characteristics
Mathematics
Item 17
item:17 (PM5002Q01 )
Cases for this item 843 Item-Rest Cor. 0.46 Item-Total Cor. 0.56
Item Threshold(s): -1.17 Weighted MNSQ 0.92
Item Delta(s): -1.17
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
1 0 220 26.1 -0.39 -12.37 0.000 -1.240 1.070
2 0 38 4.51 -0.11 -3.22 0.001 -1.080 0.820
3 1 549 65.12 0.46 14.98 0.000 0.150 1.090
4 0 32 3.8 -0.1 -2.85 0.004 -0.970 1.010
8 0 1 0.12 0.01 0.17 0.863 -0.820 0.000
9 0 1 0.12 -0.06 -1.76 0.079 -2.430 0.000
r 0 2 0.24 -0.06 -1.78 0.075 -1.460 0.780
Item 18
item:18 (PM5002Q02 )
Cases for this item 843 Item-Rest Cor. 0.40 Item-Total Cor. 0.51
Item Threshold(s): -0.04 Weighted MNSQ 1.03
Item Delta(s): -0.04
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
1 0 84 9.96 -0.07 -1.96 0.050 -0.600 1.270
2 0 164 19.45 -0.06 -1.75 0.080 -0.560 1.020
3 1 371 44.01 0.4 12.65 0.000 0.310 1.140
4 0 175 20.76 -0.28 -8.5 0.000 -1.040 1.040
5 0 32 3.8 -0.15 -4.36 0.000 -1.100 0.890
8 0 2 0.24 -0.04 -1.02 0.308 -1.810 1.150
9 0 13 1.54 -0.06 -1.69 0.092 -1.000 1.330
r 0 2 0.24 -0.06 -1.86 0.063 -1.460 0.780
112
Item 19
item:19 (PM5008Q01 )
Cases for this item 846 Item-Rest Cor. 0.51 Item-Total Cor. 0.60
Item Threshold(s): 0.91 Weighted MNSQ 0.89
Item Delta(s): 0.91
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 562 66.43 -0.4 -12.5 0.000 -0.630 1.100
1 1 244 28.84 0.51 17.4 0.000 0.820 1.030
9 0 38 4.49 -0.21 -6.12 0.000 -1.360 1.200
r 0 2 0.24 -0.07 -2.01 0.045 -1.460 0.780
Item 20
item:20 (PM5010Q01T )
Cases for this item 829 Item-Rest Cor. 0.39 Item-Total Cor. 0.53
Item Threshold(s): -2.14 1.58 Weighted MNSQ 1.09
Item Delta(s): -2.11 1.56
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 19 2.29 -0.11 -3.22 0.001 -1.380 0.970
1 0 118 14.23 -0.19 -5.57 0.000 -1.210 1.150
2 1 530 63.93 -0.04 -1.26 0.210 -0.370 1.060
3 2 140 16.89 0.34 10.43 0.000 0.710 1.120
9 0 17 2.05 -0.13 -3.67 0.000 -1.650 1.260
r 0 5 0.6 -0.07 -2.11 0.035 -2.020 1.050
Item 21
item:21 (PM5010Q02 )
Cases for this item 829 Item-Rest Cor. 0.36 Item-Total Cor. 0.48
Item Threshold(s): 0.58 Weighted MNSQ 1.05
Item Delta(s): 0.58
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 495 59.71 -0.23 -6.71 0.000 -0.640 1.110
1 1 270 32.57 0.36 11.11 0.000 0.380 1.140
9 0 56 6.76 -0.19 -5.63 0.000 -1.280 1.060
r 0 8 0.97 -0.09 -2.7 0.007 -1.710 1.400
113
Item 22
item:22 (PM5013Q01 )
Cases for this item 840 Item-Rest Cor. 0.41 Item-Total Cor. 0.51
Item Threshold(s): -0.71 Weighted MNSQ 1.03
Item Delta(s): -0.72
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
1 0 216 25.71 -0.22 -6.64 0.000 -0.930 1.050
2 1 475 56.55 0.41 13.08 0.000 0.120 1.140
3 0 64 7.62 -0.2 -6.02 0.000 -1.390 0.940
4 0 66 7.86 -0.12 -3.51 0.000 -0.980 1.060
8 0 1 0.12 -0.03 -0.96 0.338 -1.090 0.000
9 0 15 1.79 -0.1 -2.94 0.003 -1.220 0.680
r 0 3 0.36 -0.09 -2.68 0.008 -1.380 0.940
Item 23
item:23 (PM5013Q03 )
Cases for this item 840 Item-Rest Cor. 0.52 Item-Total Cor. 0.59
Item Threshold(s): 0.51 Weighted MNSQ 0.92
Item Delta(s): 0.51
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 484 57.62 -0.37 -11.46 0.000 -0.790 1.060
1 1 282 33.57 0.52 17.5 0.000 0.520 1.070
9 0 71 8.45 -0.2 -6.02 0.000 -1.120 0.960
r 0 3 0.36 -0.1 -2.8 0.005 -1.380 0.940
Item 24
item:24 (PM5015Q02 )
Cases for this item 836 Item-Rest Cor. 0.34 Item-Total Cor. 0.47
Item Threshold(s): 0.30 Weighted MNSQ 1.05
Item Delta(s): 0.30
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
1 0 95 11.36 -0.11 -3.32 0.001 -0.800 1.040
2 0 111 13.28 -0.08 -2.21 0.027 -0.550 1.180
3 0 268 32.06 -0.18 -5.43 0.000 -0.790 1.050
4 1 312 37.32 0.34 10.53 0.000 0.310 1.110
8 0 2 0.24 -0.02 -0.69 0.492 -0.810 0.290
9 0 33 3.95 -0.05 -1.31 0.191 -0.800 1.100
r 0 15 1.79 -0.05 -1.58 0.114 -1.180 0.980
114
Item 25
item:25 (PM5017Q02 )
Cases for this item 855 Item-Rest Cor. 0.28 Item-Total Cor. 0.39
Item Threshold(s): -0.60 Weighted MNSQ 1.17
Item Delta(s): -0.60
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
1 0 23 2.69 -0.07 -2.06 0.040 -1.030 1.010
2 1 476 55.67 0.28 8.65 0.000 0.120 1.180
3 0 223 26.08 -0.09 -2.56 0.011 -0.590 1.200
4 0 120 14.04 -0.21 -6.35 0.000 -1.120 1.170
8 0 2 0.23 -0.02 -0.69 0.490 -1.400 0.560
9 0 5 0.58 -0.06 -1.64 0.102 -1.590 1.360
r 0 6 0.7 -0.15 -4.35 0.000 -2.080 0.840
Item 26
item:26 (PM5017Q03 )
Cases for this item 856 Item-Rest Cor. 0.44 Item-Total Cor. 0.58
Item Threshold(s): -1.95 -1.40 Weighted MNSQ 1.07
Item Delta(s): -1.10 -2.25
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 87 10.16 -0.34 -10.45 0.000 -1.790 0.800
1 1 100 11.68 -0.07 -1.97 0.049 -0.590 1.110
2 2 625 73.01 0.39 12.48 0.000 0.070 1.130
9 0 38 4.44 -0.19 -5.75 0.000 -1.820 0.940
r 0 6 0.7 -0.13 -3.93 0.000 -2.080 0.840
Item 27
item:27 (PM5020Q02 )
Cases for this item 833 Item-Rest Cor. 0.48 Item-Total Cor. 0.56
Item Threshold(s): 1.33 Weighted MNSQ 0.89
Item Delta(s): 1.33
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 460 55.22 -0.12 -3.55 0.000 -0.570 1.090
1 1 175 21.01 0.48 15.71 0.000 0.820 0.950
9 0 189 22.69 -0.29 -8.87 0.000 -1.020 1.030
r 0 9 1.08 -0.11 -3.08 0.002 -1.410 1.020
115
Item 28
item:28 (PM5021Q01T )
Cases for this item 854 Item-Rest Cor. 0.38 Item-Total Cor. 0.46
Item Threshold(s): -1.94 Weighted MNSQ 0.99
Item Delta(s): -1.94
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 8 0.94 -0.07 -2.01 0.044 -1.100 1.300
1 0 13 1.52 -0.12 -3.54 0.000 -1.720 0.780
2 0 75 8.78 -0.23 -7.01 0.000 -1.380 1.150
3 0 83 9.72 -0.21 -6.15 0.000 -1.200 0.990
4 1 668 78.22 0.38 12.16 0.000 -0.010 1.190
9 0 3 0.35 -0.04 -1.09 0.278 -1.140 0.610
r 0 4 0.47 -0.12 -3.47 0.001 -2.160 0.790
Item 29
item:29 (PM5021Q02 )
Cases for this item 856 Item-Rest Cor. 0.40 Item-Total Cor. 0.49
Item Threshold(s): -0.35 Weighted MNSQ 1.05
Item Delta(s): -0.35
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 412 48.13 -0.37 -11.82 0.000 -0.860 1.120
1 1 437 51.05 0.4 12.78 0.000 0.260 1.170
9 0 3 0.35 -0.08 -2.27 0.023 -1.970 1.690
r 0 4 0.47 -0.12 -3.64 0.000 -2.160 0.790
Item 30
item:30 (PM5026Q01 )
Cases for this item 836 Item-Rest Cor. 0.37 Item-Total Cor. 0.45
Item Threshold(s): 2.37 Weighted MNSQ 0.92
Item Delta(s): 2.37
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 688 82.3 -0.23 -6.76 0.000 -0.490 1.120
1 1 84 10.05 0.37 11.47 0.000 1.100 0.860
9 0 58 6.94 -0.07 -2.08 0.037 -0.760 1.220
r 0 6 0.72 -0.07 -1.98 0.048 -1.110 1.090
116
Item 31
item:31 (PM5101Q01 )
Cases for this item 420 Item-Rest Cor. 0.32 Item-Total Cor. 0.44
Item Threshold(s): 0.61 Weighted MNSQ 1.09
Item Delta(s): 0.61
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
1 0 51 12.14 -0.14 -2.95 0.003 -0.710 1.190
2 0 97 23.1 -0.1 -2 0.046 -0.460 1.110
3 0 99 23.57 -0.09 -1.94 0.053 -0.570 1.300
4 1 147 35 0.32 6.98 0.000 0.470 1.100
8 0 1 0.24 0.03 0.69 0.492 0.390 0.000
9 0 15 3.57 -0.07 -1.48 0.139 -0.780 1.260
r 0 10 2.38 -0.1 -1.95 0.051 -1.210 1.410
Item 32
item:32 (PM5101Q02 )
Cases for this item 419 Item-Rest Cor. 0.40 Item-Total Cor. 0.50
Item Threshold(s): 0.98 Weighted MNSQ 0.96
Item Delta(s): 0.98
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 257 61.34 -0.24 -5.02 0.000 -0.540 1.190
1 1 119 28.4 0.4 8.8 0.000 0.740 0.930
9 0 28 6.68 -0.19 -3.91 0.000 -1.040 1.080
r 0 15 3.58 -0.08 -1.67 0.095 -0.890 1.380
Item 33
item:33 (PM5102Q01 )
Cases for this item 423 Item-Rest Cor. 0.18 Item-Total Cor. 0.28
Item Threshold(s): 2.74 Weighted MNSQ 1.05
Item Delta(s): 2.74
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
1 0 194 45.86 -0.08 -1.65 0.099 -0.250 1.060
2 0 77 18.2 -0.06 -1.29 0.197 -0.330 1.210
3 0 105 24.82 0.05 1.02 0.307 -0.080 1.290
4 1 37 8.75 0.18 3.84 0.000 0.790 1.080
9 0 7 1.65 0.01 0.1 0.918 -0.090 1.550
r 0 3 0.71 -0.12 -2.4 0.017 -2.640 0.460
117
Item 34
item:34 (PM5104Q01 )
Cases for this item 440 Item-Rest Cor. 0.36 Item-Total Cor. 0.43
Item Threshold(s): -1.79 Weighted MNSQ 1.01
Item Delta(s): -1.79
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
1 1 343 77.95 0.36 8.05 0.000 0.110 1.180
2 0 63 14.32 -0.28 -6.13 0.000 -1.240 1.040
3 0 16 3.64 -0.08 -1.62 0.106 -0.890 0.970
4 0 17 3.86 -0.17 -3.7 0.000 -1.410 1.140
9 0 1 0.23 -0.05 -1.04 0.297 -1.040 0.000
Item 35
item:35 (PM5107Q01 )
Cases for this item 427 Item-Rest Cor. 0.45 Item-Total Cor. 0.53
Item Threshold(s): 0.39 Weighted MNSQ 0.97
Item Delta(s): 0.39
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 246 57.61 -0.37 -8.17 0.000 -0.660 1.120
1 1 167 39.11 0.45 10.37 0.000 0.580 1.100
9 0 11 2.58 -0.16 -3.26 0.001 -1.180 0.920
r 0 3 0.7 -0.15 -3.12 0.002 -2.290 0.380
Item 36
item:36 (PM5107Q02 )
Cases for this item 427 Item-Rest Cor. 0.49 Item-Total Cor. 0.59
Item Threshold(s): 1.17 1.67 Weighted MNSQ 0.95
Item Delta(s): 2.10 0.75
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 260 60.89 -0.16 -3.43 0.001 -0.450 1.110
1 1 42 9.84 0.25 5.28 0.000 0.790 0.870
2 2 52 12.18 0.39 8.82 0.000 1.380 0.970
9 0 70 16.39 -0.3 -6.38 0.000 -0.970 0.900
r 0 3 0.7 -0.16 -3.24 0.001 -2.290 0.380
118
Item 37
item:37 (PM5109Q01 )
Cases for this item 440 Item-Rest Cor. 0.43 Item-Total Cor. 0.51
Item Threshold(s): 0.48 Weighted MNSQ 0.99
Item Delta(s): 0.48
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 252 57.27 -0.38 -8.47 0.000 -0.650 1.120
1 1 166 37.73 0.43 10 0.000 0.620 1.130
9 0 22 5 -0.11 -2.27 0.024 -0.890 0.770
Item 38
item:38 (PM5109Q02 )
Cases for this item 440 Item-Rest Cor. 0.36 Item-Total Cor. 0.47
Item Threshold(s): 1.78 1.91 Weighted MNSQ 1.08
Item Delta(s): 3.87 -0.19
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 261 59.32 -0.12 -2.58 0.010 -0.340 1.140
1 1 10 2.27 0.13 2.66 0.008 1.160 0.890
2 2 40 9.09 0.34 7.49 0.000 1.500 1.020
9 0 127 28.86 -0.11 -2.28 0.023 -0.460 1.180
r 0 2 0.45 -0.1 -2.03 0.043 -1.690 0.380
Item 39
item:39 (PM5110Q01 )
Cases for this item 434 Item-Rest Cor. 0.37 Item-Total Cor. 0.48
Item Threshold(s): -0.22 Weighted MNSQ 1.07
Item Delta(s): -0.22
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 207 47.7 -0.34 -7.44 0.000 -0.700 1.090
1 1 221 50.92 0.37 8.23 0.000 0.450 1.140
9 0 3 0.69 -0.09 -1.84 0.066 -1.740 1.690
r 0 3 0.69 -0.1 -2.14 0.033 -1.500 0.550
119
Item 40
item:40 (PM5110Q02 )
Cases for this item 434 Item-Rest Cor. 0.49 Item-Total Cor. 0.63
Item Threshold(s): 1.13 1.72 Weighted MNSQ 0.97
Item Delta(s): 1.94 0.91
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 284 65.44 -0.29 -6.39 0.000 -0.470 1.120
1 1 49 11.29 0.18 3.78 0.000 0.620 0.810
2 2 54 12.44 0.42 9.59 0.000 1.400 0.910
9 0 44 10.14 -0.15 -3.2 0.001 -0.560 1.200
r 0 3 0.69 -0.11 -2.32 0.021 -1.500 0.550
Item 41
item:41 (PM5124Q01 )
Cases for this item 440 Item-Rest Cor. 0.48 Item-Total Cor. 0.55
Item Threshold(s): -0.99 Weighted MNSQ 0.94
Item Delta(s): -0.99
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 146 33.18 -0.45 -10.44 0.000 -1.020 1.060
1 1 286 65 0.48 11.4 0.000 0.290 1.120
9 0 5 1.14 -0.07 -1.57 0.117 -1.160 0.970
r 0 3 0.68 -0.12 -2.6 0.010 -2.230 0.980
Item 42
item:42 (PM5124Q02 )
Cases for this item 440 Item-Rest Cor. 0.54 Item-Total Cor. 0.61
Item Threshold(s): -0.24 Weighted MNSQ 0.90
Item Delta(s): -0.24
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 182 41.36 -0.4 -9.07 0.000 -0.780 1.020
1 1 225 51.14 0.54 13.27 0.000 0.480 1.100
9 0 30 6.82 -0.24 -5.25 0.000 -1.310 1.080
r 0 3 0.68 -0.13 -2.67 0.008 -2.230 0.980
120
Item 43
item:43 (PM5124Q03 )
Cases for this item 440 Item-Rest Cor. 0.41 Item-Total Cor. 0.50
Item Threshold(s): 0.12 Weighted MNSQ 1.03
Item Delta(s): 0.12
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 217 49.32 -0.29 -6.4 0.000 -0.620 1.070
1 1 193 43.86 0.41 9.46 0.000 0.490 1.160
9 0 21 4.77 -0.17 -3.55 0.000 -1.070 1.260
r 0 9 2.05 -0.16 -3.39 0.001 -1.710 1.150
Item 44
item:44 (PM5142Q01 )
Cases for this item 423 Item-Rest Cor. 0.26 Item-Total Cor. 0.34
Item Threshold(s): -3.50 Weighted MNSQ 0.98
Item Delta(s): -3.50
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 23 5.44 -0.24 -4.98 0.000 -1.430 0.890
1 1 396 93.62 0.26 5.5 0.000 -0.060 1.170
9 0 3 0.71 -0.08 -1.7 0.090 -1.170 1.440
r 0 1 0.24 -0.06 -1.2 0.232 -3.010 0.000
Item 45
item:45 (PM5142Q02 )
Cases for this item 423 Item-Rest Cor. 0.38 Item-Total Cor. 0.51
Item Threshold(s): -1.33 Weighted MNSQ 0.98
Item Delta(s): -1.33
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 117 27.66 -0.36 -7.93 0.000 -1.040 1.150
1 1 302 71.39 0.38 8.45 0.000 0.220 1.010
9 0 3 0.71 -0.09 -1.92 0.056 -1.170 1.440
r 0 1 0.24 -0.06 -1.34 0.182 -3.010 0.000
121
Item 46
item:46 (PM5145Q01 )
Cases for this item 427 Item-Rest Cor. 0.46 Item-Total Cor. 0.53
Item Threshold(s): 1.45 Weighted MNSQ 0.89
Item Delta(s): 1.45
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 266 62.3 -0.24 -4.99 0.000 -0.480 1.130
1 1 93 21.78 0.46 10.74 0.000 1.020 1.040
9 0 65 15.22 -0.18 -3.74 0.000 -0.700 1.050
r 0 3 0.7 -0.15 -3.17 0.002 -2.290 0.380
Item 47
item:47 (PM5163Q01 )
Cases for this item 440 Item-Rest Cor. 0.53 Item-Total Cor. 0.60
Item Threshold(s): -0.72 Weighted MNSQ 0.88
Item Delta(s): -0.72
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 162 36.82 -0.49 -11.79 0.000 -1.030 1.060
1 1 265 60.23 0.53 13.14 0.000 0.380 1.090
9 0 13 2.95 -0.14 -2.94 0.003 -1.120 0.560
Item 48
item:48 (PM5169Q01 )
Cases for this item 420 Item-Rest Cor. 0.54 Item-Total Cor. 0.63
Item Threshold(s): -1.21 Weighted MNSQ 0.85
Item Delta(s): -1.21
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 108 25.71 -0.44 -10.08 0.000 -1.230 1.100
1 1 290 69.05 0.54 12.95 0.000 0.260 1.060
9 0 21 5 -0.22 -4.72 0.000 -1.500 0.900
r 0 1 0.24 -0.1 -2.16 0.032 -2.450 0.000
Item 49
item:49 (PM5169Q02 )
Cases for this item 420 Item-Rest Cor. 0.55 Item-Total Cor. 0.65
Item Threshold(s): -0.11 Weighted MNSQ 0.87
Item Delta(s): -0.11
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 175 41.67 -0.39 -8.54 0.000 -0.870 1.070
122
1 1 206 49.05 0.55 13.53 0.000 0.530 1.030
9 0 38 9.05 -0.28 -5.98 0.000 -1.240 0.990
r 0 1 0.24 -0.11 -2.24 0.026 -2.450 0.000
Item 50
item:50 (PM5181Q02 )
Cases for this item 434 Item-Rest Cor. 0.57 Item-Total Cor. 0.65
Item Threshold(s): 0.85 Weighted MNSQ 0.83
Item Delta(s): 0.85
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 202 46.54 -0.27 -5.83 0.000 -0.570 1.060
1 1 137 31.57 0.57 14.23 0.000 0.990 0.930
9 0 93 21.43 -0.29 -6.39 0.000 -0.780 1.010
r 0 2 0.46 -0.11 -2.26 0.024 -1.460 0.780
Item 51
item:51 (PM5183Q01 )
Cases for this item 427 Item-Rest Cor. 0.51 Item-Total Cor. 0.64
Item Threshold(s): -1.59 -0.87 Weighted MNSQ 1.04
Item Delta(s): -0.91 -1.55
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 49 11.48 -0.33 -7.1 0.000 -1.640 1.080
1 1 69 16.16 -0.2 -4.2 0.000 -0.760 1.000
2 2 274 64.17 0.5 12.03 0.000 0.330 1.030
9 0 32 7.49 -0.2 -4.24 0.000 -1.200 1.060
r 0 3 0.7 -0.14 -2.83 0.005 -2.290 0.380
Item 52
item:52 (PM5183Q02 )
Cases for this item 427 Item-Rest Cor. 0.42 Item-Total Cor. 0.51
Item Threshold(s): -0.26 Weighted MNSQ 1.00
Item Delta(s): -0.26
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
1 0 80 18.74 -0.15 -3.18 0.002 -0.630 0.970
2 0 32 7.49 -0.13 -2.69 0.007 -0.920 1.040
3 0 81 18.97 -0.21 -4.37 0.000 -0.790 1.180
4 1 218 51.05 0.42 9.62 0.000 0.370 1.170
8 0 1 0.23 0.07 1.5 0.134 1.680 0.000
9 0 9 2.11 -0.15 -3.16 0.002 -1.410 1.210
123
r 0 6 1.41 -0.15 -3.2 0.001 -1.950 0.570
Item 53
item:53 (PM5185Q01 )
Cases for this item 427 Item-Rest Cor. 0.19 Item-Total Cor. 0.23
Item Threshold(s): -4.02 Weighted MNSQ 1.02
Item Delta(s): -4.02
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
1 0 8 1.87 -0.12 -2.4 0.017 -1.600 1.470
2 0 5 1.17 -0.13 -2.77 0.006 -1.650 1.050
3 0 4 0.94 -0.04 -0.81 0.416 -0.600 1.730
4 1 409 95.78 0.19 4.04 0.000 -0.150 1.250
r 0 1 0.23 -0.1 -2.09 0.037 -2.450 0.000
Item 54
item:54 (PM5185Q02T )
Cases for this item 427 Item-Rest Cor. 0.35 Item-Total Cor. 0.44
Item Threshold(s): -1.28 Weighted MNSQ 1.06
Item Delta(s): -1.28
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 2 0.47 -0.09 -1.77 0.077 -0.820 0.060
1 0 20 4.68 -0.16 -3.28 0.001 -1.230 1.110
2 0 106 24.82 -0.27 -5.84 0.000 -0.930 1.210
3 1 298 69.79 0.35 7.77 0.000 0.140 1.160
r 0 1 0.23 -0.11 -2.22 0.027 -2.450 0.000
Item 55
item:55 (PM5187Q01 )
Cases for this item 423 Item-Rest Cor. 0.16 Item-Total Cor. 0.29
Item Threshold(s): 1.55 Weighted MNSQ 1.15
Item Delta(s): 1.55
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
1 0 107 25.3 -0.03 -0.64 0.525 -0.280 1.180
2 1 88 20.8 0.16 3.4 0.001 0.470 1.050
3 0 148 34.99 0.05 1.05 0.293 -0.080 1.130
4 0 73 17.26 -0.14 -2.97 0.003 -0.650 1.180
9 0 3 0.71 -0.12 -2.55 0.011 -1.890 0.770
r 0 4 0.95 -0.13 -2.76 0.006 -2.200 0.940
124
Item 56
item:56 (PM5188Q01 )
Cases for this item 423 Item-Rest Cor. 0.34 Item-Total Cor. 0.47
Item Threshold(s): -1.39 Weighted MNSQ 1.05
Item Delta(s): -1.39
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 111 26.24 -0.28 -6.08 0.000 -0.860 1.130
1 1 303 71.63 0.34 7.35 0.000 0.170 1.080
9 0 2 0.47 -0.05 -1.09 0.278 -1.420 0.530
r 0 7 1.65 -0.18 -3.82 0.000 -2.140 0.700
125
Reading
Item 29
item:29 (PR6002Q01 )
Cases for this item 385 Item-Rest Cor. 0.24 Item-Total Cor. 0.33
Item Threshold(s): 0.83 Weighted MNSQ 1.16
Item Delta(s): 0.84
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
1 0 136 35.32 -0.1 -2.04 0.042 0.060 1.080
2 1 160 41.56 0.24 4.93 0.000 0.860 1.060
3 0 41 10.65 -0.11 -2.2 0.029 0.030 1.020
4 0 40 10.39 -0.03 -0.67 0.503 0.150 1.290
9 0 8 2.08 -0.18 -3.62 0.000 -1.160 1.410
Item 30
item:30 (PR6002Q02T )
Cases for this item 385 Item-Rest Cor. 0.27 Item-Total Cor. 0.35
Item Threshold(s): 1.49 Weighted MNSQ 1.10
Item Delta(s): 1.49
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 5 1.3 -0.08 -1.62 0.106 -0.560 0.710
1 0 42 10.91 -0.28 -5.65 0.000 -0.470 1.090
2 0 65 16.88 -0.12 -2.39 0.017 0.070 1.190
3 0 156 40.52 0.05 0.97 0.331 0.340 1.130
4 1 114 29.61 0.27 5.54 0.000 0.970 0.990
9 0 3 0.78 -0.08 -1.63 0.103 -0.450 0.450
Item 31
item:31 (PR6002Q04 )
Cases for this item 383 Item-Rest Cor. 0.57 Item-Total Cor. 0.63
Item Threshold(s): -0.27 Weighted MNSQ 0.84
Item Delta(s): -0.27
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 92 24.02 -0.31 -6.37 0.000 -0.220 1.050
1 1 241 62.92 0.57 13.57 0.000 0.850 0.930
9 0 50 13.05 -0.43 -9.17 0.000 -0.840 1.130
126
Item 32
item:32 (PR6002Q05 )
Cases for this item 384 Item-Rest Cor. 0.38 Item-Total Cor. 0.46
Item Threshold(s): 0.23 Weighted MNSQ 1.04
Item Delta(s): 0.23
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
1 0 43 11.2 -0.33 -6.74 0.000 -0.690 0.950
2 0 80 20.83 -0.03 -0.49 0.623 0.210 1.020
3 1 205 53.39 0.38 8.03 0.000 0.810 1.080
4 0 40 10.42 -0.15 -3.03 0.003 0.000 1.050
9 0 16 4.17 -0.15 -2.95 0.003 -0.540 1.230
Item 33
item:33 (PR6004Q01 )
Cases for this item 766 Item-Rest Cor. 0.43 Item-Total Cor. 0.51
Item Threshold(s): -1.14 Weighted MNSQ 0.93
Item Delta(s): -1.14
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 135 17.62 -0.34 -9.94 0.000 -0.570 1.070
1 1 591 77.15 0.43 13.07 0.000 0.670 1.040
9 0 40 5.22 -0.23 -6.45 0.000 -0.850 1.100
Item 34
item:34 (PR6004Q05B )
Cases for this item 755 Item-Rest Cor. 0.34 Item-Total Cor. 0.43
Item Threshold(s): -1.50 Weighted MNSQ 1.00
Item Delta(s): -1.50
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 109 14.44 -0.26 -7.32 0.000 -0.510 1.080
1 1 619 81.99 0.34 9.91 0.000 0.580 1.090
9 0 27 3.58 -0.21 -6.03 0.000 -0.760 1.320
127
Item 35
item:35 (PR6004Q06 )
Cases for this item 766 Item-Rest Cor. 0.38 Item-Total Cor. 0.44
Item Threshold(s): -2.37 Weighted MNSQ 0.90
Item Delta(s): -2.37
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
1 0 9 1.17 -0.12 -3.27 0.001 -0.760 1.120
2 0 28 3.66 -0.27 -7.66 0.000 -1.340 0.860
3 0 30 3.92 -0.22 -6.26 0.000 -1.050 0.950
4 1 693 90.47 0.38 11.28 0.000 0.530 1.100
9 0 6 0.78 -0.06 -1.67 0.095 -0.490 0.590
Item 36
item:36 (PR6008Q02 )
Cases for this item 756 Item-Rest Cor. 0.36 Item-Total Cor. 0.47
Item Threshold(s): 0.84 Weighted MNSQ 1.01
Item Delta(s): 0.84
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 409 54.1 -0.26 -7.5 0.000 0.090 0.980
1 1 314 41.53 0.37 10.81 0.000 1.040 0.970
9 0 33 4.37 -0.24 -6.81 0.000 -0.620 1.230
Item 37
item:37 (PR6008Q04 )
Cases for this item 754 Item-Rest Cor. 0.42 Item-Total Cor. 0.49
Item Threshold(s): -1.56 Weighted MNSQ 0.90
Item Delta(s): -1.56
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 75 9.95 -0.28 -7.91 0.000 -0.490 0.960
1 1 630 83.55 0.42 12.68 0.000 0.670 1.000
9 0 49 6.5 -0.29 -8.46 0.000 -0.830 1.060
128
Item 38
item:38 (PR6008Q05 )
Cases for this item 755 Item-Rest Cor. 0.35 Item-Total Cor. 0.46
Item Threshold(s): 0.06 Weighted MNSQ 1.05
Item Delta(s): 0.06
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 264 34.97 -0.2 -5.53 0.000 0.040 1.020
1 1 432 57.22 0.36 10.43 0.000 0.860 0.970
9 0 59 7.81 -0.3 -8.75 0.000 -0.630 1.120
Item 39
item:39 (PR6010Q01 )
Cases for this item 766 Item-Rest Cor. 0.34 Item-Total Cor. 0.46
Item Threshold(s): 0.22 Weighted MNSQ 1.05
Item Delta(s): 0.22
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
1 0 119 15.54 -0.22 -6.35 0.000 -0.240 0.970
2 1 419 54.7 0.33 9.74 0.000 0.900 1.060
3 0 135 17.62 -0.03 -0.79 0.431 0.170 1.060
4 0 80 10.44 -0.21 -5.85 0.000 -0.380 1.050
9 0 13 1.7 -0.08 -2.17 0.030 -0.360 1.370
Item 40
item:40 (PR6010Q03 )
Cases for this item 759 Item-Rest Cor. 0.32 Item-Total Cor. 0.40
Item Threshold(s): 2.78 Weighted MNSQ 1.00
Item Delta(s): 2.78
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 624 82.21 -0.19 -5.28 0.000 0.320 1.130
1 1 99 13.04 0.31 9.03 0.000 1.450 0.960
9 0 36 4.74 -0.16 -4.32 0.000 -0.320 1.010
129
Item 41
item:41 (PR6010Q06 )
Cases for this item 761 Item-Rest Cor. 0.36 Item-Total Cor. 0.48
Item Threshold(s): 0.49 Weighted MNSQ 1.03
Item Delta(s): 0.49
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
1 0 36 4.73 -0.19 -5.27 0.000 -0.630 1.190
2 0 195 25.62 -0 -0.01 0.991 0.330 1.020
3 1 374 49.15 0.36 10.68 0.000 0.940 1.080
4 0 143 18.79 -0.31 -9.04 0.000 -0.350 0.860
8 0 2 0.26 -0.04 -1.19 0.236 -0.550 1.600
9 0 11 1.45 -0.14 -3.89 0.000 -0.780 1.330
Item 42
item:42 (PR6010Q07 )
Cases for this item 755 Item-Rest Cor. 0.49 Item-Total Cor. 0.57
Item Threshold(s): 1.50 Weighted MNSQ 0.90
Item Delta(s): 1.50
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 462 61.19 -0.38 -11.11 0.000 0.060 1.060
1 1 228 30.2 0.49 15.38 0.000 1.310 0.900
9 0 65 8.61 -0.15 -4.11 0.000 -0.100 1.050
Item 43
item:43 (PR6011Q03 )
Cases for this item 372 Item-Rest Cor. 0.33 Item-Total Cor. 0.43
Item Threshold(s): 0.23 Weighted MNSQ 1.12
Item Delta(s): 0.23
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
1 0 94 25.27 -0.09 -1.73 0.085 0.120 0.990
2 0 49 13.17 -0.2 -3.89 0.000 -0.220 1.000
3 1 196 52.69 0.33 6.75 0.000 0.800 1.130
4 0 26 6.99 -0.19 -3.64 0.000 -0.460 1.090
9 0 7 1.88 -0.09 -1.71 0.088 -0.560 1.150
130
Item 44
item:44 (PR6011Q05 )
Cases for this item 364 Item-Rest Cor. 0.24 Item-Total Cor. 0.32
Item Threshold(s): 2.30 Weighted MNSQ 1.07
Item Delta(s): 2.30
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 276 75.82 -0.09 -1.76 0.080 0.260 1.130
1 1 62 17.03 0.24 4.79 0.000 1.120 1.090
9 0 26 7.14 -0.2 -3.95 0.000 -0.380 0.930
Item 45
item:45 (PR6011Q07 )
Cases for this item 363 Item-Rest Cor. 0.44 Item-Total Cor. 0.52
Item Threshold(s): -1.06 Weighted MNSQ 0.90
Item Delta(s): -1.06
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 73 20.11 -0.36 -7.37 0.000 -0.510 0.930
1 1 274 75.48 0.44 9.32 0.000 0.680 1.070
9 0 16 4.41 -0.22 -4.21 0.000 -0.970 0.780
Item 46
item:46 (PR6013Q03 )
Cases for this item 740 Item-Rest Cor. 0.46 Item-Total Cor. 0.57
Item Threshold(s): 1.13 Weighted MNSQ 0.91
Item Delta(s): 1.13
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 384 51.89 -0.28 -7.94 0.000 -0.030 1.060
1 1 264 35.68 0.46 14.04 0.000 1.210 0.970
9 0 92 12.43 -0.24 -6.77 0.000 -0.380 0.970
Item 47
item:47 (PR6013Q04 )
Cases for this item 742 Item-Rest Cor. 0.36 Item-Total Cor. 0.47
Item Threshold(s): 0.93 Weighted MNSQ 1.03
Item Delta(s): 0.93
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
1 0 78 10.51 -0.14 -3.78 0.000 -0.130 1.290
2 0 217 29.25 -0.2 -5.5 0.000 -0.080 1.050
131
3 1 294 39.62 0.36 10.47 0.000 0.960 1.110
4 0 144 19.41 -0.09 -2.54 0.011 0.180 1.010
8 0 3 0.4 0.01 0.14 0.889 -0.400 0.690
9 0 6 0.81 -0.08 -2.12 0.034 -0.330 1.930
Item 48
item:48 (PR6013Q06 )
Cases for this item 735 Item-Rest Cor. 0.45 Item-Total Cor. 0.56
Item Threshold(s): -0.06 Weighted MNSQ 0.94
Item Delta(s): -0.06
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
1 1 433 58.91 0.45 13.52 0.000 0.880 1.050
2 0 109 14.83 -0.11 -3.01 0.003 -0.110 1.050
3 0 112 15.24 -0.33 -9.5 0.000 -0.550 1.010
4 0 67 9.12 -0.18 -5.09 0.000 -0.320 0.840
8 0 4 0.54 0.01 0.37 0.710 0.270 1.370
9 0 10 1.36 -0.08 -2.21 0.028 -0.460 1.400
Item 49
item:49 (PR6013Q08 )
Cases for this item 353 Item-Rest Cor. 0.33 Item-Total Cor. 0.43
Item Threshold(s): 0.63 Weighted MNSQ 1.04
Item Delta(s): 0.63
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 157 44.48 -0.17 -3.19 0.002 0.080 1.090
1 1 160 45.33 0.33 6.59 0.000 0.950 1.040
9 0 36 10.2 -0.27 -5.26 0.000 -0.590 0.780
Item 50
item:50 (PR6014Q03 )
Cases for this item 378 Item-Rest Cor. 0.16 Item-Total Cor. 0.24
Item Threshold(s): -0.90 Weighted MNSQ 1.23
Item Delta(s): -0.90
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
1 1 280 74.07 0.16 3.22 0.001 0.580 1.050
2 0 11 2.91 -0.15 -3.04 0.003 -0.550 1.280
3 0 56 14.81 0.01 0.2 0.840 0.200 1.250
4 0 27 7.14 -0.15 -2.91 0.004 -0.380 1.190
132
8 0 2 0.53 -0.04 -0.79 0.428 -0.880 0.810
9 0 2 0.53 -0.11 -2.24 0.025 -1.800 1.490
Item 51
item:51 (PR6014Q06T )
Cases for this item 378 Item-Rest Cor. 0.45 Item-Total Cor. 0.56
Item Threshold(s): 0.20 1.94 Weighted MNSQ 1.08
Item Delta(s): 0.39 1.74
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 8 2.12 -0.2 -3.95 0.000 -1.260 1.100
1 0 14 3.7 -0.24 -4.84 0.000 -1.110 0.970
2 0 57 15.08 -0.33 -6.8 0.000 -0.460 1.040
3 0 86 22.75 -0.05 -0.96 0.337 0.250 0.990
4 1 141 37.3 0.2 3.86 0.000 0.640 0.890
5 2 71 18.78 0.31 6.39 0.000 1.320 0.920
9 0 1 0.26 -0.06 -1.15 0.250 -1.450 0.000
Item 52
item:52 (PR6014Q07 )
Cases for this item 375 Item-Rest Cor. 0.46 Item-Total Cor. 0.53
Item Threshold(s): 0.26 Weighted MNSQ 0.94
Item Delta(s): 0.26
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 159 42.4 -0.37 -7.67 0.000 -0.080 1.050
1 1 200 53.33 0.46 10.12 0.000 0.910 0.960
9 0 16 4.27 -0.24 -4.84 0.000 -1.080 1.120
Item 53
item:53 (PR6015Q01 )
Cases for this item 378 Item-Rest Cor. 0.32 Item-Total Cor. 0.40
Item Threshold(s): -0.44 Weighted MNSQ 1.10
Item Delta(s): -0.44
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
1 0 10 2.65 -0.16 -3.08 0.002 -0.610 0.840
2 0 20 5.29 -0.26 -5.24 0.000 -0.890 1.000
3 1 252 66.67 0.32 6.59 0.000 0.710 1.060
4 0 91 24.07 -0.13 -2.59 0.010 0.050 1.080
8 0 1 0.26 -0.03 -0.49 0.622 -0.400 0.000
133
9 0 4 1.06 -0.1 -1.97 0.050 -0.550 0.400
Item 54
item:54 (PR6015Q03 )
Cases for this item 769 Item-Rest Cor. 0.28 Item-Total Cor. 0.37
Item Threshold(s): 2.60 Weighted MNSQ 1.02
Item Delta(s): 2.60
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 626 81.4 -0.1 -2.67 0.008 0.330 1.050
1 1 113 14.69 0.28 8.01 0.000 1.360 0.940
9 0 30 3.9 -0.31 -9.19 0.000 -1.120 1.010
Item 55
item:55 (PR6015Q04 )
Cases for this item 766 Item-Rest Cor. 0.51 Item-Total Cor. 0.60
Item Threshold(s): 0.67 Weighted MNSQ 0.91
Item Delta(s): 0.67
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 383 50 -0.4 -12.04 0.000 -0.060 0.960
1 1 348 45.43 0.51 16.6 0.000 1.090 0.900
9 0 35 4.57 -0.27 -7.8 0.000 -0.900 1.300
Item 56
item:56 (PR6015Q06 )
Cases for this item 768 Item-Rest Cor. 0.31 Item-Total Cor. 0.40
Item Threshold(s): -1.45 Weighted MNSQ 1.02
Item Delta(s): -1.45
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
1 0 38 4.95 -0.19 -5.32 0.000 -0.590 1.200
2 0 49 6.38 -0.11 -3.11 0.002 -0.280 1.130
3 1 630 82.03 0.31 8.97 0.000 0.610 1.060
4 0 43 5.6 -0.19 -5.31 0.000 -0.430 1.020
8 0 1 0.13 -0.05 -1.3 0.193 -0.250 0.000
9 0 7 0.91 -0.05 -1.49 0.138 -0.460 0.710
134
Item 57
item:57 (PR6017Q04 )
Cases for this item 378 Item-Rest Cor. 0.35 Item-Total Cor. 0.45
Item Threshold(s): -0.88 Weighted MNSQ 1.03
Item Delta(s): -0.88
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
1 0 40 10.58 -0.12 -2.3 0.022 0.080 0.910
2 1 286 75.66 0.35 7.2 0.000 0.790 1.000
3 0 17 4.5 -0.18 -3.5 0.001 -0.340 1.050
4 0 24 6.35 -0.23 -4.55 0.000 -0.380 0.940
8 0 1 0.26 -0.02 -0.45 0.653 -1.140 0.000
9 0 10 2.65 -0.12 -2.36 0.019 -0.180 1.160
Item 58
item:58 (PR6017Q05T )
Cases for this item 373 Item-Rest Cor. 0.45 Item-Total Cor. 0.62
Item Threshold(s): -0.47 0.76 Weighted MNSQ 1.08
Item Delta(s): -0.12 0.42
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 21 5.63 -0.3 -6.13 0.000 -0.640 0.920
1 0 78 20.91 -0.29 -5.82 0.000 -0.210 0.790
2 1 113 30.29 0.01 0.21 0.830 0.500 0.930
3 2 161 43.16 0.37 7.63 0.000 1.150 0.910
Item 59
item:59 (PR6017Q08 )
Cases for this item 373 Item-Rest Cor. 0.41 Item-Total Cor. 0.51
Item Threshold(s): -0.37 Weighted MNSQ 0.96
Item Delta(s): -0.37
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 95 25.47 -0.3 -6 0.000 -0.100 0.930
1 1 251 67.29 0.41 8.55 0.000 0.910 0.960
9 0 27 7.24 -0.24 -4.66 0.000 -0.200 1.100
135
Item 60
item:60 (PR6017Q10 )
Cases for this item 370 Item-Rest Cor. 0.33 Item-Total Cor. 0.45
Item Threshold(s): 0.01 Weighted MNSQ 1.04
Item Delta(s): 0.01
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
1 0 38 10.27 -0.19 -3.62 0.000 -0.130 0.810
2 1 223 60.27 0.33 6.79 0.000 0.920 1.030
3 0 20 5.41 -0.25 -4.95 0.000 -0.440 0.970
4 0 86 23.24 -0.11 -2.09 0.037 0.270 0.910
9 0 3 0.81 -0.05 -0.98 0.326 -0.220 0.390
Item 61
item:61 (PR6017Q11 )
Cases for this item 370 Item-Rest Cor. 0.20 Item-Total Cor. 0.34
Item Threshold(s): 0.56 Weighted MNSQ 1.15
Item Delta(s): 0.56
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
1 0 94 25.41 -0.12 -2.41 0.016 0.260 0.980
2 1 183 49.46 0.2 3.99 0.000 0.920 1.030
3 0 67 18.11 -0.07 -1.39 0.166 0.300 1.020
4 0 24 6.49 -0.03 -0.63 0.529 0.190 0.980
9 0 2 0.54 -0.16 -3.08 0.002 -1.070 1.840
Item 62
item:62 (PR6018Q01T )
Cases for this item 392 Item-Rest Cor. 0.41 Item-Total Cor. 0.52
Item Threshold(s): -1.05 Weighted MNSQ 0.96
Item Delta(s): -1.05
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 10 2.55 -0.15 -3.05 0.002 -0.760 0.870
1 0 9 2.3 -0.18 -3.53 0.000 -0.810 0.620
2 0 26 6.63 -0.32 -6.63 0.000 -0.960 1.090
3 0 46 11.73 -0.13 -2.54 0.011 -0.130 1.160
4 1 299 76.28 0.41 8.91 0.000 0.700 1.040
9 0 2 0.51 -0.06 -1.16 0.247 -1.510 2.160
136
Item 63
item:63 (PR6018Q03 )
Cases for this item 392 Item-Rest Cor. 0.35 Item-Total Cor. 0.48
Item Threshold(s): 1.50 Weighted MNSQ 1.00
Item Delta(s): 1.50
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 267 68.11 -0.33 -6.79 0.000 0.100 1.110
1 1 119 30.36 0.35 7.34 0.000 1.160 0.960
9 0 6 1.53 -0.07 -1.4 0.161 -0.440 1.780
Item 64
item:64 (PR6018Q08 )
Cases for this item 392 Item-Rest Cor. 0.57 Item-Total Cor. 0.73
Item Threshold(s): -1.20 -0.08 Weighted MNSQ 0.95
Item Delta(s): -0.80 -0.47
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 53 13.52 -0.42 -9.14 0.000 -0.860 0.960
1 1 91 23.21 -0.16 -3.24 0.001 -0.030 0.960
2 2 237 60.46 0.51 11.72 0.000 0.940 0.930
9 0 11 2.81 -0.23 -4.62 0.000 -1.190 1.250
Item 65
item:65 (PR6018Q09 )
Cases for this item 392 Item-Rest Cor. 0.49 Item-Total Cor. 0.61
Item Threshold(s): 0.13 Weighted MNSQ 0.93
Item Delta(s): 0.13
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 156 39.8 -0.4 -8.52 0.000 -0.250 1.040
1 1 220 56.12 0.49 10.98 0.000 0.960 0.950
9 0 16 4.08 -0.24 -4.86 0.000 -0.680 1.360
Item 66
item:66 (PR6023Q01 )
Cases for this item 390 Item-Rest Cor. 0.31 Item-Total Cor. 0.43
Item Threshold(s): -0.62 Weighted MNSQ 1.07
Item Delta(s): -0.62
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
1 0 36 9.23 -0.18 -3.54 0.000 -0.170 0.830
137
2 1 277 71.03 0.31 6.53 0.000 0.790 1.020
3 0 22 5.64 -0.19 -3.81 0.000 -0.290 0.830
4 0 49 12.56 -0.14 -2.76 0.006 0.000 1.080
8 0 1 0.26 0.03 0.55 0.580 0.710 0.000
9 0 5 1.28 -0.03 -0.56 0.573 0.020 1.300
Item 67
item:67 (PR6023Q06 )
Cases for this item 389 Item-Rest Cor. 0.35 Item-Total Cor. 0.45
Item Threshold(s): -1.34 Weighted MNSQ 0.98
Item Delta(s): -1.34
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
1 0 7 1.8 -0.09 -1.7 0.090 -0.280 0.360
2 0 23 5.91 -0.25 -5.08 0.000 -0.650 0.900
3 1 318 81.75 0.35 7.4 0.000 0.750 1.000
4 0 33 8.48 -0.17 -3.33 0.001 -0.220 0.940
9 0 8 2.06 -0.13 -2.67 0.008 -0.510 1.060
Item 68
item:68 (PR6023Q07 )
Cases for this item 389 Item-Rest Cor. 0.52 Item-Total Cor. 0.61
Item Threshold(s): -0.44 Weighted MNSQ 0.87
Item Delta(s): -0.44
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
1 0 9 2.31 -0.14 -2.82 0.005 -0.270 0.680
2 0 11 2.83 -0.15 -3.01 0.003 -0.640 0.780
3 0 43 11.05 -0.34 -7.02 0.000 -0.460 0.830
4 0 54 13.88 -0.24 -4.9 0.000 -0.120 0.800
5 1 264 67.87 0.53 12.22 0.000 0.940 0.940
8 0 1 0.26 0.01 0.27 0.786 -0.390 0.000
9 0 7 1.8 -0.09 -1.74 0.082 -0.250 1.250
138
Item 69
item:69 (PR6023Q08 )
Cases for this item 389 Item-Rest Cor. 0.45 Item-Total Cor. 0.54
Item Threshold(s): -1.02 Weighted MNSQ 0.90
Item Delta(s): -1.02
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 78 20.05 -0.39 -8.23 0.000 -0.360 0.900
1 1 301 77.38 0.45 9.9 0.000 0.810 0.970
9 0 10 2.57 -0.21 -4.25 0.000 -0.710 0.850
Item 70
item:70 (PR6026Q02T )
Cases for this item 393 Item-Rest Cor. 0.26 Item-Total Cor. 0.41
Item Threshold(s): 0.56 Weighted MNSQ 1.12
Item Delta(s): 0.56
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 8 2.04 -0.04 -0.86 0.389 0.020 1.690
1 0 94 23.92 -0.16 -3.2 0.001 -0.010 0.930
2 0 91 23.16 -0.06 -1.1 0.274 0.170 1.040
3 1 187 47.58 0.26 5.32 0.000 0.860 1.100
8 0 1 0.25 -0.04 -0.84 0.400 -1.020 0.000
9 0 12 3.05 -0.17 -3.49 0.001 -0.580 0.830
Item 71
item:71 (PR6026Q05T )
Cases for this item 373 Item-Rest Cor. 0.25 Item-Total Cor. 0.39
Item Threshold(s): 1.17 Weighted MNSQ 1.10
Item Delta(s): 1.17
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 38 10.19 -0.21 -4.12 0.000 -0.180 1.230
1 0 57 15.28 -0.04 -0.81 0.419 0.210 0.960
2 0 136 36.46 -0.09 -1.67 0.096 0.170 1.040
3 1 135 36.19 0.25 4.98 0.000 1.000 1.020
9 0 7 1.88 -0 -0.07 0.944 0.430 0.740
139
Item 72
item:72 (PR6027Q01T )
Cases for this item 387 Item-Rest Cor. 0.28 Item-Total Cor. 0.43
Item Threshold(s): -0.24 Weighted MNSQ 1.11
Item Delta(s): -0.24
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 8 2.07 -0.14 -2.75 0.006 -1.090 0.810
1 0 30 7.75 -0.1 -1.94 0.053 -0.280 1.180
2 0 108 27.91 -0.19 -3.72 0.000 -0.180 1.190
3 1 239 61.76 0.28 5.61 0.000 0.700 1.120
9 0 2 0.52 -0.06 -1.14 0.257 -0.360 1.070
Item 73
item:73 (PR6027Q04 )
Cases for this item 387 Item-Rest Cor. 0.41 Item-Total Cor. 0.51
Item Threshold(s): -1.88 Weighted MNSQ 0.91
Item Delta(s): -1.88
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
1 1 332 85.79 0.41 8.79 0.000 0.570 1.110
2 0 19 4.91 -0.27 -5.53 0.000 -1.050 0.980
3 0 19 4.91 -0.18 -3.59 0.000 -0.780 1.040
4 0 15 3.88 -0.2 -4.09 0.000 -1.330 0.870
9 0 2 0.52 -0.08 -1.59 0.113 -1.630 1.540
Item 74
item:74 (PR6027Q10 )
Cases for this item 387 Item-Rest Cor. 0.32 Item-Total Cor. 0.47
Item Threshold(s): 0.41 Weighted MNSQ 1.06
Item Delta(s): 0.41
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 168 43.41 -0.22 -4.43 0.000 -0.070 1.160
1 1 191 49.35 0.32 6.62 0.000 0.830 1.120
9 0 28 7.24 -0.2 -3.9 0.000 -0.600 1.000
140
Science
Item 21
item:21 (PS7000Q01 )
Cases for this item 827 Item-Rest Cor. 0.24 Item-Total Cor. 0.35
Item Threshold(s): 0.87 Weighted MNSQ 1.06
Item Delta(s): 0.87
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
1 0 38 4.59 -0.14 -4 0.000 -0.330 0.820
2 1 279 33.74 0.24 7.1 0.000 0.430 0.860
3 0 207 25.03 -0.15 -4.25 0.000 -0.190 0.800
4 0 289 34.95 0 0.12 0.902 -0.040 0.800
8 0 3 0.36 -0.03 -0.75 0.453 -0.420 1.040
9 0 4 0.48 -0.07 -2.11 0.036 -1.280 1.760
r 0 7 0.85 -0.18 -5.27 0.000 -1.500 0.770
Item 22
item:22 (PS7000Q02T )
Cases for this item 828 Item-Rest Cor. 0.32 Item-Total Cor. 0.41
Item Threshold(s): -1.27 Weighted MNSQ 0.98
Item Delta(s): -1.27
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 7 0.85 -0.07 -1.89 0.059 -0.650 1.390
1 0 41 4.95 -0.2 -5.97 0.000 -0.730 0.800
2 0 138 16.67 -0.17 -5.08 0.000 -0.430 0.820
3 1 630 76.09 0.32 9.62 0.000 0.240 0.800
9 0 5 0.6 -0.06 -1.75 0.081 -0.850 1.190
r 0 7 0.85 -0.17 -4.99 0.000 -1.500 0.770
Item 23
item:23 (PS7002Q03 )
Cases for this item 834 Item-Rest Cor. 0.35 Item-Total Cor. 0.44
Item Threshold(s): 1.34 Weighted MNSQ 0.97
Item Delta(s): 1.35
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 522 62.59 -0.09 -2.51 0.012 0.010 0.810
1 1 215 25.78 0.35 10.83 0.000 0.660 0.760
9 0 90 10.79 -0.31 -9.42 0.000 -0.670 0.790
r 0 7 0.84 -0.17 -4.95 0.000 -1.780 0.850
141
Item 24
item:24 (PS7002Q04 )
Cases for this item 834 Item-Rest Cor. 0.34 Item-Total Cor. 0.43
Item Threshold(s): -1.11 Weighted MNSQ 0.97
Item Delta(s): -1.11
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
1 0 107 12.83 -0.23 -6.75 0.000 -0.580 0.790
2 0 33 3.96 -0.18 -5.13 0.000 -0.640 0.770
3 1 617 73.98 0.34 10.43 0.000 0.300 0.810
4 0 64 7.67 -0.06 -1.8 0.072 -0.210 0.950
8 0 3 0.36 -0.04 -1.03 0.301 -0.590 0.510
9 0 5 0.6 -0.12 -3.58 0.000 -1.290 0.690
r 0 5 0.6 -0.14 -4.01 0.000 -1.950 0.740
Item 25
item:25 (PS7012Q01 )
Cases for this item 808 Item-Rest Cor. 0.26 Item-Total Cor. 0.37
Item Threshold(s): 0.77 Weighted MNSQ 1.05
Item Delta(s): 0.77
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
1 0 109 13.49 -0.01 -0.23 0.818 -0.010 0.850
2 1 290 35.89 0.26 7.79 0.000 0.490 0.860
3 0 252 31.19 -0.18 -5.12 0.000 -0.200 0.850
4 0 144 17.82 -0.07 -2.07 0.039 -0.060 0.790
8 0 2 0.25 -0.02 -0.5 0.619 -0.380 0.110
9 0 7 0.87 -0.05 -1.55 0.121 -0.690 0.530
r 0 4 0.5 -0.12 -3.38 0.001 -2.320 0.620
Item 26
item:26 (PS7012Q03 )
Cases for this item 808 Item-Rest Cor. 0.45 Item-Total Cor. 0.54
Item Threshold(s): -0.19 Weighted MNSQ 0.90
Item Delta(s): -0.19
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 268 33.17 -0.24 -7.12 0.000 -0.310 0.760
1 1 452 55.94 0.45 14.21 0.000 0.500 0.760
9 0 83 10.27 -0.32 -9.6 0.000 -0.770 0.760
r 0 5 0.62 -0.13 -3.85 0.000 -2.180 0.620
142
Item 27
item:27 (PS7012Q04T )
Cases for this item 406 Item-Rest Cor. 0.20 Item-Total Cor. 0.30
Item Threshold(s): -0.77 Weighted MNSQ 1.12
Item Delta(s): -0.77
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 2 0.49 -0.1 -1.94 0.053 -1.770 0.650
1 0 21 5.17 -0.14 -2.94 0.003 -0.570 0.880
2 0 110 27.09 -0.09 -1.89 0.060 -0.250 0.840
3 1 270 66.5 0.2 4.04 0.000 0.190 0.920
9 0 1 0.25 -0.09 -1.73 0.084 -1.500 0.000
r 0 2 0.49 -0.12 -2.46 0.014 -2.620 0.050
Item 28
item:28 (PS7013Q01 )
Cases for this item 828 Item-Rest Cor. 0.35 Item-Total Cor. 0.45
Item Threshold(s): -0.65 Weighted MNSQ 0.98
Item Delta(s): -0.65
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
1 0 112 13.53 -0.06 -1.82 0.070 -0.210 0.830
2 0 93 11.23 -0.24 -7.23 0.000 -0.630 0.750
3 0 62 7.49 -0.11 -3.27 0.001 -0.230 0.820
4 1 538 64.98 0.35 10.86 0.000 0.310 0.780
8 0 3 0.36 -0.04 -1.22 0.223 -0.260 0.500
9 0 12 1.45 -0.17 -4.9 0.000 -1.360 0.880
r 0 8 0.97 -0.18 -5.25 0.000 -1.440 0.740
Item 29
item:29 (PS7013Q02 )
Cases for this item 828 Item-Rest Cor. 0.40 Item-Total Cor. 0.50
Item Threshold(s): -0.61 Weighted MNSQ 0.95
Item Delta(s): -0.61
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 203 24.52 -0.19 -5.41 0.000 -0.320 0.770
1 1 533 64.37 0.4 12.68 0.000 0.340 0.780
9 0 84 10.14 -0.32 -9.64 0.000 -0.770 0.800
r 0 8 0.97 -0.18 -5.28 0.000 -1.440 0.740
143
Item 30
item:30 (PS7014Q01 )
Cases for this item 816 Item-Rest Cor. 0.39 Item-Total Cor. 0.55
Item Threshold(s): -1.03 -0.03 Weighted MNSQ 1.05
Item Delta(s): -0.57 -0.49
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 147 18.01 -0.27 -8.06 0.000 -0.590 0.770
1 1 215 26.35 -0.1 -2.84 0.005 -0.070 0.760
2 2 432 52.94 0.36 10.97 0.000 0.470 0.720
9 0 18 2.21 -0.17 -4.79 0.000 -0.930 0.630
r 0 4 0.49 -0.1 -2.72 0.007 -1.390 0.810
Item 31
item:31 (PS7014Q03 )
Cases for this item 816 Item-Rest Cor. 0.24 Item-Total Cor. 0.35
Item Threshold(s): 0.87 Weighted MNSQ 1.04
Item Delta(s): 0.87
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 451 55.27 -0.03 -0.76 0.448 0.030 0.800
1 1 279 34.19 0.24 7.14 0.000 0.450 0.770
9 0 82 10.05 -0.31 -9.46 0.000 -0.670 0.800
r 0 4 0.49 -0.11 -3.05 0.002 -1.390 0.810
Item 32
item:32 (PS7017Q01 )
Cases for this item 406 Item-Rest Cor. 0.32 Item-Total Cor. 0.43
Item Threshold(s): 0.32 Weighted MNSQ 1.03
Item Delta(s): 0.32
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
1 0 74 18.23 -0.11 -2.32 0.021 -0.250 0.760
2 0 70 17.24 -0.02 -0.36 0.722 -0.150 0.930
3 0 61 15.02 -0.14 -2.93 0.004 -0.400 0.790
4 1 178 43.84 0.32 6.88 0.000 0.430 0.860
8 0 5 1.23 -0.01 -0.15 0.881 -0.060 1.110
9 0 13 3.2 -0.21 -4.23 0.000 -0.950 0.670
r 0 5 1.23 -0.19 -3.91 0.000 -1.950 0.740
144
Item 33
item:33 (PS7017Q04D )
Cases for this item 801 Item-Rest Cor. 0.33 Item-Total Cor. 0.41
Item Threshold(s): 1.74 Weighted MNSQ 0.96
Item Delta(s): 1.74
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
9 0 136 16.98 -0.18 -5.1 0.000 -0.390 0.910
A 0 496 61.92 -0.07 -2.06 0.039 -0.020 0.810
G 1 131 16.35 0.28 8.21 0.000 0.750 0.800
H 1 24 3 0.15 4.42 0.000 1.110 0.600
r 0 14 1.75 -0.21 -6.07 0.000 -1.300 0.830
Item 34
item:34 (PS7018Q03 )
Cases for this item 802 Item-Rest Cor. 0.16 Item-Total Cor. 0.27
Item Threshold(s): 1.16 Weighted MNSQ 1.08
Item Delta(s): 1.16
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
1 0 148 18.45 0.01 0.15 0.882 -0.020 0.830
2 1 227 28.3 0.16 4.62 0.000 0.450 0.880
3 0 314 39.15 -0.05 -1.4 0.160 0.040 0.770
4 0 80 9.98 -0.05 -1.5 0.133 -0.120 0.910
8 0 5 0.62 0.02 0.51 0.612 -0.060 1.530
9 0 18 2.24 -0.15 -4.35 0.000 -0.660 0.880
r 0 10 1.25 -0.12 -3.44 0.001 -0.800 1.200
Item 35
item:35 (PS7018Q04T )
Cases for this item 400 Item-Rest Cor. 0.29 Item-Total Cor. 0.44
Item Threshold(s): 0.83 1.19 Weighted MNSQ 0.99
Item Delta(s): 2.04 -0.02
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 26 6.5 -0.06 -1.24 0.217 -0.170 0.600
1 0 81 20.25 -0.11 -2.22 0.027 -0.230 0.810
2 0 146 36.5 -0.07 -1.44 0.152 -0.110 0.820
3 1 78 19.5 0.13 2.54 0.011 0.310 0.890
4 2 54 13.5 0.23 4.66 0.000 0.660 0.850
9 0 5 1.25 -0.08 -1.54 0.124 -0.410 1.060
145
r 0 10 2.5 -0.16 -3.24 0.001 -0.480 0.970
Item 36
item:36 (PS7020Q03 )
Cases for this item 792 Item-Rest Cor. 0.34 Item-Total Cor. 0.44
Item Threshold(s): -0.35 Weighted MNSQ 0.99
Item Delta(s): -0.35
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
1 0 18 2.27 -0.14 -4.08 0.000 -0.760 0.720
2 1 469 59.22 0.34 10.28 0.000 0.370 0.850
3 0 65 8.21 -0.21 -5.94 0.000 -0.550 0.610
4 0 215 27.15 -0.15 -4.12 0.000 -0.230 0.900
8 0 14 1.77 -0.04 -1.22 0.224 0.000 0.960
9 0 5 0.63 -0.09 -2.44 0.015 -0.920 0.950
r 0 6 0.76 -0.16 -4.45 0.000 -1.180 0.800
Item 37
item:37 (PS7020Q04 )
Cases for this item 397 Item-Rest Cor. 0.55 Item-Total Cor. 0.63
Item Threshold(s): 0.69 Weighted MNSQ 0.84
Item Delta(s): 0.69
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 212 53.4 -0.35 -7.31 0.000 -0.280 0.810
1 1 147 37.03 0.55 13.24 0.000 0.730 0.730
9 0 36 9.07 -0.3 -6.28 0.000 -0.810 0.790
r 0 2 0.5 -0.13 -2.52 0.012 -0.870 1.660
Item 38
item:38 (PS7021Q02T )
Cases for this item 828 Item-Rest Cor. 0.23 Item-Total Cor. 0.34
Item Threshold(s): 0.89 Weighted MNSQ 1.04
Item Delta(s): 0.89
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 30 3.62 -0.17 -4.83 0.000 -0.680 0.850
1 0 114 13.77 -0.24 -6.96 0.000 -0.360 0.780
2 0 394 47.58 0.02 0.5 0.619 0.060 0.820
3 1 283 34.18 0.23 6.93 0.000 0.450 0.820
9 0 6 0.72 -0.08 -2.19 0.029 -0.280 0.960
r 0 1 0.12 -0.04 -1.07 0.283 -1.510 0.000
146
Item 39
item:39 (PS7021Q04T )
Cases for this item 828 Item-Rest Cor. 0.31 Item-Total Cor. 0.42
Item Threshold(s): 0.56 Weighted MNSQ 1.00
Item Delta(s): 0.56
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 64 7.73 -0.19 -5.66 0.000 -0.420 0.880
1 0 166 20.05 -0.2 -5.92 0.000 -0.290 0.850
2 0 252 30.43 -0.02 -0.67 0.506 0.000 0.840
3 1 337 40.7 0.31 9.37 0.000 0.490 0.720
9 0 6 0.72 -0.06 -1.71 0.087 -0.230 0.890
r 0 3 0.36 -0.07 -2 0.046 -1.100 0.700
Item 40
item:40 (PS7201Q01 )
Cases for this item 402 Item-Rest Cor. 0.44 Item-Total Cor. 0.53
Item Threshold(s): 0.15 Weighted MNSQ 0.91
Item Delta(s): 0.15
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 153 38.06 -0.22 -4.52 0.000 -0.160 0.750
1 1 200 49.75 0.44 9.68 0.000 0.610 0.730
9 0 47 11.69 -0.32 -6.77 0.000 -0.570 0.650
r 0 2 0.5 -0.11 -2.2 0.029 -2.030 0.890
Item 41
item:41 (PS7201Q02 )
Cases for this item 402 Item-Rest Cor. 0.42 Item-Total Cor. 0.51
Item Threshold(s): -0.54 Weighted MNSQ 0.93
Item Delta(s): -0.54
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
1 0 67 16.67 -0.21 -4.29 0.000 -0.180 0.780
2 0 29 7.21 -0.13 -2.65 0.008 -0.310 0.670
3 1 258 64.18 0.41 9.11 0.000 0.450 0.770
4 0 29 7.21 -0.15 -3.04 0.003 -0.430 0.680
8 0 3 0.75 -0.08 -1.64 0.103 -0.700 0.500
9 0 14 3.48 -0.18 -3.68 0.000 -0.800 0.770
r 0 2 0.5 -0.11 -2.13 0.034 -2.030 0.890
147
Item 42
item:42 (PS7201Q03 )
Cases for this item 402 Item-Rest Cor. 0.28 Item-Total Cor. 0.35
Item Threshold(s): 2.40 Weighted MNSQ 0.98
Item Delta(s): 2.40
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 290 72.14 0.01 0.27 0.787 0.160 0.840
1 1 48 11.94 0.28 5.82 0.000 0.880 0.690
9 0 63 15.67 -0.25 -5.23 0.000 -0.310 0.690
r 0 1 0.25 -0.1 -1.92 0.056 -2.660 0.000
Item 43
item:43 (PS7205Q02 )
Cases for this item 416 Item-Rest Cor. 0.14 Item-Total Cor. 0.26
Item Threshold(s): 0.10 Weighted MNSQ 1.12
Item Delta(s): 0.10
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
1 0 14 3.37 -0.07 -1.35 0.179 -0.090 0.750
2 0 27 6.49 -0.13 -2.67 0.008 -0.250 0.840
3 1 215 51.68 0.14 2.96 0.003 0.330 0.770
4 0 156 37.5 -0.01 -0.25 0.803 0.070 0.810
9 0 3 0.72 -0.18 -3.74 0.000 -1.900 1.080
r 0 1 0.24 -0.14 -2.83 0.005 -2.250 0.000
Item 44
item:44 (PS7208Q01 )
Cases for this item 402 Item-Rest Cor. 0.35 Item-Total Cor. 0.45
Item Threshold(s): -0.10 Weighted MNSQ 0.97
Item Delta(s): -0.10
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
1 0 67 16.67 -0.1 -1.95 0.052 0.010 0.730
2 0 72 17.91 -0.24 -4.98 0.000 -0.350 0.720
3 1 222 55.22 0.35 7.52 0.000 0.470 0.820
4 0 32 7.96 -0.12 -2.52 0.012 -0.300 0.710
9 0 6 1.49 -0 -0.06 0.950 0.120 0.550
r 0 3 0.75 -0.14 -2.84 0.005 -1.890 0.670
148
Item 45
item:45 (PS7208Q02 )
Cases for this item 402 Item-Rest Cor. 0.24 Item-Total Cor. 0.34
Item Threshold(s): 0.96 Weighted MNSQ 1.03
Item Delta(s): 0.96
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 181 45.02 0.02 0.38 0.706 0.120 0.800
1 1 132 32.84 0.24 4.87 0.000 0.570 0.780
9 0 85 21.14 -0.26 -5.48 0.000 -0.300 0.780
r 0 4 1 -0.13 -2.57 0.011 -1.440 1.050
Item 46
item:46 (PS7211Q01 )
Cases for this item 419 Item-Rest Cor. 0.28 Item-Total Cor. 0.37
Item Threshold(s): 1.43 Weighted MNSQ 0.99
Item Delta(s): 1.43
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 287 68.5 -0.06 -1.19 0.233 0.030 0.820
1 1 103 24.58 0.28 5.91 0.000 0.580 0.700
9 0 21 5.01 -0.27 -5.83 0.000 -0.720 1.050
r 0 8 1.91 -0.24 -5.03 0.000 -1.300 0.680
Item 47
item:47 (PS7211Q02T )
Cases for this item 419 Item-Rest Cor. 0.33 Item-Total Cor. 0.44
Item Threshold(s): 0.45 Weighted MNSQ 0.99
Item Delta(s): 0.45
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 10 2.39 -0.13 -2.76 0.006 -0.690 0.910
1 0 59 14.08 -0.27 -5.7 0.000 -0.430 0.740
2 0 161 38.42 -0.03 -0.69 0.489 0.000 0.830
3 1 181 43.2 0.33 7.09 0.000 0.480 0.770
r 0 8 1.91 -0.24 -4.94 0.000 -1.300 0.680
149
Item 48
item:48 (PS7212Q01 )
Cases for this item 395 Item-Rest Cor. 0.24 Item-Total Cor. 0.36
Item Threshold(s): 0.33 Weighted MNSQ 1.07
Item Delta(s): 0.33
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 189 47.85 -0.07 -1.47 0.142 -0.040 0.860
1 1 179 45.32 0.24 4.91 0.000 0.420 0.810
9 0 20 5.06 -0.26 -5.28 0.000 -0.830 0.770
r 0 7 1.77 -0.2 -4.03 0.000 -0.810 0.710
Item 49
item:49 (PS7212Q02 )
Cases for this item 395 Item-Rest Cor. 0.19 Item-Total Cor. 0.31
Item Threshold(s): 0.44 Weighted MNSQ 1.11
Item Delta(s): 0.44
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
1 0 44 11.14 -0.2 -4.06 0.000 -0.400 0.720
2 1 170 43.04 0.19 3.76 0.000 0.380 0.850
3 0 51 12.91 -0.01 -0.13 0.900 0.190 0.900
4 0 116 29.37 0.04 0.73 0.465 0.020 0.800
8 0 1 0.25 -0.05 -1 0.319 -1.020 0.000
9 0 6 1.52 -0.12 -2.47 0.014 -1.370 1.240
r 0 7 1.77 -0.2 -4.02 0.000 -0.810 0.710
Item 50
item:50 (PS7212Q04 )
Cases for this item 395 Item-Rest Cor. 0.25 Item-Total Cor. 0.31
Item Threshold(s): 2.89 Weighted MNSQ 0.97
Item Delta(s): 2.89
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 251 63.54 0.16 3.24 0.001 0.160 0.810
1 1 31 7.85 0.25 5.07 0.000 1.070 0.660
9 0 103 26.08 -0.25 -5.19 0.000 -0.200 0.940
r 0 10 2.53 -0.21 -4.27 0.000 -0.700 0.630
150
Item 51
item:51 (PS7215Q02 )
Cases for this item 428 Item-Rest Cor. 0.44 Item-Total Cor. 0.53
Item Threshold(s): 1.33 Weighted MNSQ 0.89
Item Delta(s): 1.33
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 237 55.37 -0.14 -3.02 0.003 0.030 0.770
1 1 115 26.87 0.44 10.14 0.000 0.800 0.630
9 0 69 16.12 -0.26 -5.64 0.000 -0.310 0.860
r 0 7 1.64 -0.21 -4.41 0.000 -0.840 0.800
Item 52
item:52 (PS7215Q03 )
Cases for this item 428 Item-Rest Cor. 0.20 Item-Total Cor. 0.32
Item Threshold(s): 0.94 Weighted MNSQ 1.05
Item Delta(s): 0.94
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 244 57.01 0.01 0.15 0.884 0.100 0.800
1 1 142 33.18 0.2 4.26 0.000 0.480 0.780
9 0 17 3.97 -0.15 -3.24 0.001 -0.420 1.050
r 0 25 5.84 -0.29 -6.29 0.000 -0.610 0.760
Item 53
item:53 (PS7216Q01 )
Cases for this item 419 Item-Rest Cor. 0.36 Item-Total Cor. 0.47
Item Threshold(s): -0.18 Weighted MNSQ 0.98
Item Delta(s): -0.18
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
1 0 16 3.82 -0.15 -3.2 0.001 -0.550 0.650
2 0 105 25.06 -0.13 -2.75 0.006 -0.160 0.850
3 0 50 11.93 -0.2 -4.17 0.000 -0.370 0.720
4 1 237 56.56 0.36 8 0.000 0.410 0.770
8 0 1 0.24 -0.03 -0.57 0.567 -0.120 0.000
9 0 4 0.95 -0 -0.08 0.937 -0.590 2.010
r 0 6 1.43 -0.23 -4.73 0.000 -1.390 0.780
151
Item 54
item:54 (PS7216Q03 )
Cases for this item 419 Item-Rest Cor. 0.38 Item-Total Cor. 0.53
Item Threshold(s): 0.51 1.67 Weighted MNSQ 1.05
Item Delta(s): 0.88 1.29
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 216 51.55 -0.22 -4.57 0.000 -0.130 0.760
1 1 113 26.97 0.2 4.16 0.000 0.350 0.780
2 2 62 14.8 0.27 5.76 0.000 0.900 0.660
9 0 22 5.25 -0.22 -4.51 0.000 -0.680 0.920
r 0 6 1.43 -0.23 -4.91 0.000 -1.390 0.780
Item 55
item:55 (PS7217Q01T )
Cases for this item 402 Item-Rest Cor. 0.40 Item-Total Cor. 0.49
Item Threshold(s): -0.63 Weighted MNSQ 0.93
Item Delta(s): -0.63
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 2 0.5 -0.1 -2 0.047 -1.000 0.530
1 0 17 4.23 -0.18 -3.72 0.000 -0.490 0.790
2 0 26 6.47 -0.3 -6.21 0.000 -0.830 0.680
3 0 19 4.73 -0.14 -2.92 0.004 -0.360 0.550
4 0 69 17.16 -0.08 -1.57 0.117 -0.110 0.740
5 1 266 66.17 0.4 8.65 0.000 0.440 0.770
9 0 2 0.5 -0.09 -1.8 0.073 -1.120 0.710
r 0 1 0.25 -0.09 -1.83 0.069 -2.660 0.000
Item 56
item:56 (PS7217Q02 )
Cases for this item 402 Item-Rest Cor. 0.42 Item-Total Cor. 0.56
Item Threshold(s): -0.04 1.67 Weighted MNSQ 0.96
Item Delta(s): 0.15 1.47
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 97 24.13 -0.17 -3.42 0.001 -0.220 0.700
1 1 158 39.3 0.25 5.11 0.000 0.450 0.780
2 2 65 16.17 0.24 5.04 0.000 0.820 0.680
9 0 81 20.15 -0.33 -7.09 0.000 -0.420 0.680
r 0 1 0.25 -0.09 -1.88 0.061 -2.660 0.000
152
Item 57
item:57 (PS7220Q01 )
Cases for this item 427 Item-Rest Cor. 0.43 Item-Total Cor. 0.52
Item Threshold(s): -1.02 Weighted MNSQ 0.94
Item Delta(s): -1.02
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
1 1 315 73.77 0.43 9.77 0.000 0.390 0.790
2 0 34 7.96 -0.2 -4.19 0.000 -0.320 0.590
3 0 35 8.2 -0.14 -3 0.003 -0.330 0.730
4 0 28 6.56 -0.18 -3.73 0.000 -0.440 0.650
8 0 2 0.47 -0.08 -1.75 0.080 -1.070 0.470
9 0 9 2.11 -0.23 -4.85 0.000 -1.190 0.690
r 0 4 0.94 -0.13 -2.64 0.009 -0.930 1.040
Item 58
item:58 (PS7220Q02T )
Cases for this item 428 Item-Rest Cor. 0.22 Item-Total Cor. 0.34
Item Threshold(s): -0.37 Weighted MNSQ 1.07
Item Delta(s): -0.37
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 43 10.05 -0.22 -4.71 0.000 -0.430 0.760
1 0 111 25.93 -0.05 -0.99 0.322 -0.040 0.760
2 1 263 61.45 0.22 4.76 0.000 0.380 0.810
9 0 6 1.4 -0.04 -0.92 0.359 -0.300 1.420
r 0 5 1.17 -0.15 -3.13 0.002 -0.910 0.910
Item 59
item:59 (PS7220Q03 )
Cases for this item 428 Item-Rest Cor. 0.32 Item-Total Cor. 0.44
Item Threshold(s): 0.26 Weighted MNSQ 1.00
Item Delta(s): 0.26
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
1 0 77 17.99 -0.03 -0.72 0.475 0.030 0.900
2 0 80 18.69 -0.14 -2.89 0.004 -0.130 0.680
3 0 49 11.45 -0.19 -4.08 0.000 -0.270 0.750
4 1 207 48.36 0.33 7.09 0.000 0.490 0.770
8 0 5 1.17 0.01 0.28 0.783 0.080 0.890
9 0 5 1.17 -0.17 -3.5 0.001 -1.040 1.030
153
r 0 5 1.17 -0.16 -3.26 0.001 -0.910 0.910
Item 60
item:60 (PS7221Q01 )
Cases for this item 416 Item-Rest Cor. 0.22 Item-Total Cor. 0.28
Item Threshold(s): -3.05 Weighted MNSQ 0.99
Item Delta(s): -3.05
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
1 0 4 0.96 -0.04 -0.84 0.404 -0.120 0.740
2 0 9 2.16 -0.12 -2.41 0.016 -0.500 0.940
3 1 394 94.71 0.23 4.7 0.000 0.210 0.800
4 0 5 1.2 -0.07 -1.45 0.149 -0.640 0.970
8 0 1 0.24 -0.12 -2.46 0.014 -2.050 0.000
9 0 2 0.48 -0.13 -2.74 0.006 -1.660 1.410
r 0 1 0.24 -0.13 -2.69 0.007 -2.250 0.000
Item 61
item:61 (PS7221Q02 )
Cases for this item 416 Item-Rest Cor. 0.35 Item-Total Cor. 0.51
Item Threshold(s): -0.23 1.24 Weighted MNSQ 1.04
Item Delta(s): 0.03 0.98
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 151 36.3 -0.23 -4.8 0.000 -0.170 0.740
1 1 157 37.74 0.02 0.49 0.624 0.210 0.710
2 2 98 23.56 0.31 6.66 0.000 0.710 0.730
9 0 9 2.16 -0.18 -3.73 0.000 -1.020 1.280
r 0 1 0.24 -0.14 -2.93 0.004 -2.250 0.000
Item 62
item:62 (PS7221Q03T )
Cases for this item 416 Item-Rest Cor. 0.32 Item-Total Cor. 0.43
Item Threshold(s): 0.01 Weighted MNSQ 1.01
Item Delta(s): 0.01
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 3 0.72 -0.04 -0.79 0.432 0.300 1.490
1 0 44 10.58 -0.32 -6.97 0.000 -0.520 0.750
2 0 145 34.86 -0.1 -2.08 0.038 -0.040 0.840
3 1 223 53.61 0.32 6.81 0.000 0.430 0.720
r 0 1 0.24 -0.14 -2.89 0.004 -2.250 0.000
154
Item 63
item:63 (PS7221Q04 )
Cases for this item 416 Item-Rest Cor. 0.24 Item-Total Cor. 0.30
Item Threshold(s): -2.51 Weighted MNSQ 0.96
Item Delta(s): -2.51
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
1 0 4 0.96 0.01 0.28 0.777 0.280 0.900
2 1 381 91.59 0.24 4.96 0.000 0.220 0.790
3 0 1 0.24 -0.09 -1.91 0.057 -1.740 0.000
4 0 24 5.77 -0.19 -3.85 0.000 -0.580 0.970
8 0 2 0.48 0.01 0.11 0.915 0.620 0.160
9 0 3 0.72 -0.15 -3.19 0.002 -1.090 1.140
r 0 1 0.24 -0.13 -2.72 0.007 -2.250 0.000
Item 64
item:64 (PS7222Q01 )
Cases for this item 419 Item-Rest Cor. 0.35 Item-Total Cor. 0.43
Item Threshold(s): -1.94 Weighted MNSQ 0.97
Item Delta(s): -1.94
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
1 0 18 4.3 -0.12 -2.51 0.013 -0.570 0.770
2 0 9 2.15 -0.19 -3.92 0.000 -1.130 0.660
3 0 25 5.97 -0.2 -4.15 0.000 -0.700 0.730
4 1 358 85.44 0.35 7.75 0.000 0.250 0.810
8 0 2 0.48 0.01 0.18 0.857 0.100 0.780
9 0 3 0.72 -0.11 -2.16 0.031 -1.230 1.660
r 0 4 0.95 -0.18 -3.77 0.000 -1.230 0.560
Item 65
item:65 (PS7222Q02T )
Cases for this item 419 Item-Rest Cor. 0.24 Item-Total Cor. 0.34
Item Threshold(s): 1.07 Weighted MNSQ 1.04
Item Delta(s): 1.07
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 19 4.53 -0.16 -3.31 0.001 -0.490 0.670
1 0 78 18.62 -0.11 -2.33 0.020 -0.130 0.900
2 0 185 44.15 -0.01 -0.14 0.892 0.030 0.850
3 1 130 31.03 0.24 4.98 0.000 0.510 0.740
155
9 0 3 0.72 -0.12 -2.4 0.017 -1.060 1.380
r 0 4 0.95 -0.2 -4.07 0.000 -1.230 0.560
Item 66
item:66 (PS7222Q03T )
Cases for this item 419 Item-Rest Cor. 0.32 Item-Total Cor. 0.43
Item Threshold(s): -0.35 Weighted MNSQ 1.02
Item Delta(s): -0.35
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 44 10.5 -0.2 -4.12 0.000 -0.360 0.750
1 0 109 26.01 -0.15 -3.11 0.002 -0.160 0.800
2 1 252 60.14 0.32 6.93 0.000 0.340 0.840
9 0 9 2.15 -0.05 -1.02 0.308 -0.300 0.730
r 0 5 1.19 -0.22 -4.52 0.000 -1.510 0.800
Item 67
item:67 (PS7224Q02T )
Cases for this item 402 Item-Rest Cor. 0.29 Item-Total Cor. 0.37
Item Threshold(s): 1.91 Weighted MNSQ 0.96
Item Delta(s): 1.91
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 44 10.95 -0.16 -3.23 0.001 -0.210 0.730
1 0 80 19.9 -0.16 -3.21 0.001 -0.070 0.810
2 0 201 50 0.06 1.1 0.271 0.170 0.790
3 1 70 17.41 0.29 5.98 0.000 0.780 0.830
9 0 3 0.75 -0.12 -2.35 0.019 -0.720 0.710
r 0 4 1 -0.13 -2.65 0.008 -1.440 1.050
Item 68
item:68 (PS7228Q02 )
Cases for this item 395 Item-Rest Cor. 0.37 Item-Total Cor. 0.47
Item Threshold(s): 0.88 Weighted MNSQ 0.98
Item Delta(s): 0.89
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 235 59.49 -0.2 -4.06 0.000 -0.070 0.870
1 1 135 34.18 0.37 7.91 0.000 0.590 0.750
9 0 19 4.81 -0.24 -4.84 0.000 -0.620 0.600
r 0 6 1.52 -0.22 -4.4 0.000 -0.980 0.600
156
Item 69
item:69 (PS7228Q03 )
Cases for this item 395 Item-Rest Cor. 0.49 Item-Total Cor. 0.57
Item Threshold(s): 0.85 Weighted MNSQ 0.88
Item Delta(s): 0.85
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 194 49.11 -0.2 -3.99 0.000 -0.090 0.800
1 1 138 34.94 0.49 11 0.000 0.670 0.730
9 0 57 14.43 -0.3 -6.26 0.000 -0.410 0.880
r 0 6 1.52 -0.22 -4.46 0.000 -0.980 0.600
Item 70
item:70 (PS7228Q04 )
Cases for this item 395 Item-Rest Cor. 0.32 Item-Total Cor. 0.43
Item Threshold(s): 0.53 Weighted MNSQ 1.02
Item Delta(s): 0.53
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
1 0 37 9.37 -0.15 -2.93 0.004 -0.230 0.590
2 1 163 41.27 0.32 6.62 0.000 0.520 0.820
3 0 127 32.15 0.01 0.17 0.864 -0.010 0.850
4 0 46 11.65 -0.2 -4.03 0.000 -0.320 0.770
8 0 2 0.51 0 0.05 0.960 0.240 0.980
9 0 14 3.54 -0.15 -2.97 0.003 -0.730 1.110
r 0 6 1.52 -0.21 -4.33 0.000 -0.980 0.600
Item 71
item:71 (PS7230Q02T )
Cases for this item 416 Item-Rest Cor. 0.31 Item-Total Cor. 0.41
Item Threshold(s): -0.45 Weighted MNSQ 1.01
Item Delta(s): -0.45
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 31 7.45 -0.12 -2.48 0.013 -0.170 0.870
1 0 119 28.61 -0.22 -4.67 0.000 -0.200 0.750
2 1 263 63.22 0.31 6.64 0.000 0.380 0.770
r 0 3 0.72 -0.2 -4.09 0.000 -1.860 1.050
157
Item 72
item:72 (PS7230Q03T )
Cases for this item 416 Item-Rest Cor. 0.23 Item-Total Cor. 0.33
Item Threshold(s): 1.41 Weighted MNSQ 1.01
Item Delta(s): 1.41
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 1 0.24 -0.06 -1.25 0.213 -0.690 0.000
1 0 42 10.1 -0.17 -3.54 0.000 -0.220 0.870
2 0 110 26.44 -0.12 -2.39 0.017 -0.060 0.720
3 0 152 36.54 0.05 0.99 0.320 0.160 0.760
4 1 105 25.24 0.23 4.79 0.000 0.610 0.800
9 0 3 0.72 0 0.04 0.965 0.020 0.280
r 0 3 0.72 -0.2 -4.21 0.000 -1.860 1.050
Item 73
item:73 (PS7231Q01T )
Cases for this item 416 Item-Rest Cor. 0.02 Item-Total Cor. 0.14
Item Threshold(s): 0.78 Weighted MNSQ 1.17
Item Delta(s): 0.78
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 10 2.4 -0.09 -1.91 0.056 -0.270 0.400
1 0 52 12.5 -0.29 -6.23 0.000 -0.490 0.790
2 1 154 37.02 0.02 0.48 0.628 0.320 0.750
3 0 198 47.6 0.22 4.68 0.000 0.250 0.810
r 0 2 0.48 -0.18 -3.7 0.000 -2.450 0.290
Item 74
item:74 (PS7231Q04T )
Cases for this item 416 Item-Rest Cor. 0.29 Item-Total Cor. 0.40
Item Threshold(s): 0.66 Weighted MNSQ 1.00
Item Delta(s): 0.66
Label Score Count % of tot Pt Bis t sig. p PV1Avg:1 PV1SD:1
0 0 21 5.05 -0.19 -3.96 0.000 -0.490 0.900
1 0 70 16.83 -0.07 -1.34 0.182 0.010 0.690
2 0 157 37.74 -0.12 -2.44 0.015 -0.050 0.830
3 1 165 39.66 0.29 6.14 0.000 0.540 0.690
9 0 1 0.24 -0.09 -1.81 0.071 -0.670 0.000
r 0 2 0.48 -0.18 -3.81 0.000 -2.450 0.290
158
159
Appendix 4: ICC gender performance
Mathematics
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
Reading
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
Science
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
Appendix 5: Pilot trial item pool characteristics
Mathematics
Unit Item
Code Unit Name Content Context Process Cluster Delta tau1 tau2 Thresholds
PM5002Q01 Internet Use Uncertainty and data Societal Employing RSM -0.06
553.34
PM5002Q02 Internet Use Quantity Societal Employing RSM 0.63
641.52
PM5008Q01 Tiling Pattern Space and shape Societal Employing PM1 -0.90
715.52
PM5010Q01T Climbing Frame Space and shape Personal Interpreting RSM 1.07 -1.84 1.84 477.79 767.55
PM5010Q02 Climbing Frame Space and shape Personal Formulating RSM 0.26
689.81
PM5013Q01 Energy Use Uncertainty and data Scientific Employing PM2 -0.44
588.79
PM5013Q03 Energy Use Uncertainty and data Scientific Interpreting PM 2 2.60
684.44
PM5015Q02 Aspect Ratio Change and relationships Personal Employing PM 1 0.67
667.61
PM5017Q02 Weather Forecast Uncertainty and data Scientific Interpreting PM 1 -1.45
598.05
PM5017Q03 Weather Forecast Uncertainty and data Scientific Formulating PM 1 -0.88 0.57 -0.57 492.59 535.43
PM5020Q02 Golden Rectangle Change and relationships Scientific Employing RSM 0.15
747.69
PM5021Q01T Freezer Temperatures Quantity Occupational Interpreting PM 2 -0.37
493.13
PM5021Q02 Freezer Temperatures Quantity Occupational Employing PM 2 0.01
617.53
PM5026Q01 Sculpture Change and relationships Scientific Formulating PM 2 0.56
829.17
PM5101Q01 Lighthouse Space and shape Scientific Formulating PM 2 -1.05
691.84
PM5101Q02 Lighthouse Quantity Scientific Employing PM 2 1.50
720.58
PM5102Q01 Tree Trunk Change and relationships Scientific Employing PM 1 -0.64
858.06
PM5104Q01 Baby Growth Uncertainty and data Personal Formulating PM 2 0.13
504.74
196
Unit Item
Code Unit Name Content Context Process Cluster Delta tau1 tau2 Thresholds
PM5107Q01 Taxi Fares Quantity Societal Employing PM 2 -0.62
674.86
PM5107Q02 Taxi Fares Quantity Societal Employing PM 2 -1.34 0.67 -0.67 735.62 774.56
PM5109Q01 Arrowhead Kite Space and shape Personal Employing PM 1 -0.44
681.87
PM5109Q02 Arrowhead Kite Space and shape Personal Employing PM 1 -1.02 2.03 -2.03 783.13 793.26
PM5110Q01 Fence Change and relationships Occupational Formulating PM 1 0.56
627.26
PM5110Q02 Fence Change and relationships Occupational Formulating PM 1 1.17 0.51 -0.51 732.50 778.46
PM5124Q01 Concrete Change and relationships Occupational Formulating PM 2 -0.24
567.05
PM5124Q02 Concrete Change and relationships Occupational Formulating PM 2 -1.88
625.63
PM5124Q03 Concrete Change and relationships Occupational Formulating PM 2 0.41
653.98
PM5142Q01 Machu Picchu Quantity Societal Interpreting PM 1 -3.50
372.16
PM5142Q02 Machu Picchu Quantity Societal Employing PM 1 -1.33
540.72
PM5145Q01 Decagon Tiles Space and shape Scientific Employing PM 2 1.45
757.74
PM5163Q01 Hair Gel Quantity Personal Employing PM 1 -0.72
588.71
PM5169Q01 Shoe Sizes Change and relationships Personal Employing PM 1 -1.21
550.38
PM5169Q02 Shoe Sizes Change and relationships Personal Employing PM 1 -0.11
635.99
PM5181Q02 Pendulum Change and relationships Scientific Employing PM 2 0.85
710.61
PM5183Q01 House Frame Space and shape Occupational Interpreting PM 2 -1.23 0.32 -0.32 520.63 576.71
PM5183Q02 House Frame Space and shape Occupational Formulating PM 2 -0.26
624.54
PM5185Q01 Jeans Sizes Uncertainty and data Societal Interpreting PM 1 -4.02
331.35
PM5185Q02T Jeans Sizes Change and relationships Societal Interpreting PM 1 -1.28
545.16
PM5187Q01 Jaden’s House Space and shape Personal Interpreting PM 1 1.55
765.53
197
Unit Item
Code Unit Name Content Context Process Cluster Delta tau1 tau2 Thresholds
PM5188Q01 Car Speed Uncertainty and data Societal Employing RSM -1.39
536.28
198
Reading
Unit Item
Code Unit Name Aspect
Text
Format Situation Cluster Delta tau1 tau2 Thresholds
PR6002Q01 Egyptian Mummies Integrate and interpret Continuous Educational PR 2 0.84
576.19
PR6002Q02T Egyptian Mummies Access and retrieve Continuous Educational PR 2 1.49
635.36
PR6002Q04 Egyptian Mummies Access and retrieve Continuous Educational PR 2 -0.27
475.57
PR6002Q05 Egyptian Mummies Integrate and interpret Continuous Educational PR 2 0.23
521.47
PR6004Q01 Museum Park Access and retrieve
Non-continuous Public PR 1 -1.14
396.77
PR6004Q05B Museum Park Reflect and evaluate
Non-continuous Public PR 1 -1.50
363.59
PR6004Q06 Museum Park Access and retrieve
Non-continuous Public PR 1 -2.37
284.97
PR6008Q02 Mobile Phones Access and retrieve
Non-continuous Public PR 2 0.84
576.64
PR6008Q04 Mobile Phones Reflect and evaluate
Non-continuous Public PM 2 -1.56
358.14
PR6008Q05 Mobile Phones Access and retrieve
Non-continuous Public PR 2 0.06
505.47
PR6010Q01 Exploration Today Access and retrieve Continuous Educational PR 2 0.22
519.93
PR6010Q03 Exploration Today Integrate and interpret Continuous Educational PR 2 2.78
752.61
PR6010Q06 Exploration Today Integrate and interpret Continuous Educational PR 2 0.50
545.29
PR6010Q07 Exploration Today Reflect and evaluate Continuous Educational PR 2 1.50
636.54
PR6011Q03 Returning Integrate and interpret Continuous Personal PR 2 0.23
520.74
PR6011Q05 Returning Integrate and interpret Continuous Personal PR 2 2.30
709.62
PR6011Q07 Returning Integrate and interpret Continuous Personal PR 2 -1.06
403.77
199
Unit Item
Code Unit Name Aspect
Text
Format Situation Cluster Delta tau1 tau2 Thresholds
PR6013Q03 About Cats Integrate and interpret Continuous Personal PR 1 1.13
603.00
PR6013Q04 About Cats Access and retrieve Continuous Personal PR 1 0.93
584.55
PR6013Q06 About Cats Reflect and evaluate Continuous Personal PR 1 -0.06
494.57
PR6013Q08 About Cats Reflect and evaluate Continuous Personal PR 1 0.63
557.74
PR6014Q03
The Job of an Air Traffic Controller Reflect and evaluate Continuous Occupational PR 2 -0.90
418.58
PR6014Q06T
The Job of an Air Traffic Controller Access and retrieve Continuous Occupational PR 2 1.07 -0.68 0.68 518.47 676.62
PR6014Q07 The Job of an Air Traffic Controller Reflect and evaluate Continuous Occupational PR 2 0.26
524.02
PR6015Q01
Kenya Tourism and Conservation Reflect and evaluate Continuous Educational RSM -0.44
459.94
PR6015Q03
Kenya Tourism and Conservation Integrate and interpret Continuous Educational RSM 2.60
736.25
PR6015Q04
Kenya Tourism and Conservation Access and retrieve Continuous Educational RSM 0.67
561.19
PR6015Q06
Kenya Tourism and Conservation Access and retrieve
Non-continuous Educational RSM -1.45
368.86
PR6017Q04 The Two Campaigns Integrate and interpret Continuous Personal PR 1 -0.88
420.49
PR6017Q05T The Two Campaigns Integrate and interpret Continuous Personal PR 1 0.15 -0.27 0.27 457.57 569.37
PR6017Q08 The Two Campaigns Integrate and interpret Continuous Personal PR 1 -0.37
466.84
PR6017Q10 The Two Campaigns Access and retrieve Continuous Personal PR 1 0.01
501.57
PR6017Q11 The Two Campaigns Integrate and interpret Continuous Personal PR 1 0.56
550.92
PR6018Q01T Aski Gym Youth Programme Access and retrieve Continuous Personal PR 1 -1.05
405.13
200
Unit Item
Code Unit Name Aspect
Text
Format Situation Cluster Delta tau1 tau2 Thresholds
PR6018Q03 Aski Gym Youth Programme Integrate and interpret Continuous Personal PR 1 1.50
636.81
PR6018Q08 Aski Gym Youth Programme Integrate and interpret Continuous Personal PR 1 -0.64 -0.16 0.16 391.22 493.02
PR6018Q09 Aski Gym Youth Programme Reflect and evaluate Mixed Personal PR 1 0.13
511.93
PR6023Q01 Trial by Teen Reflect and evaluate Mixed Occupational PR 2 -0.62
443.76
PR6023Q06 Trial by Teen Integrate and interpret Continuous Occupational PR 2 -1.34
378.50
PR6023Q07 Trial by Teen Integrate and interpret Mixed Occupational PR 2 -0.44
460.57
PR6023Q08 Trial by Teen Reflect and evaluate
Non-continuous Occupational PR 2 -1.02
407.49
PR6026Q02T Bus Timetable Access and retrieve
Non-continuous Public PR 1 0.56
551.19
PR6026Q05T Bus Timetable Access and retrieve
Non-continuous Public PR 1 1.17
606.27
PR6027Q01T Underground Cooking Access and retrieve
Non-continuous Personal RSM -0.24
478.21
PR6027Q04 Underground Cooking Access and retrieve
Non-continuous Personal RSM -1.88
329.23
PR6027Q10 Underground Cooking Integrate and interpret
Non-continuous Personal RSM 0.41
537.47
201
Science
Unit Item
Code Unit Name Competency Application Area
Context
setting area Cluster Delta tau1 tau2 Thresholds
PS7000Q01 Oily birds Explaining phenomena scientifically Environment Social RSM 0.87
611.91
PS7000Q02T Oily birds Using scientific evidence Environment Social RSM -1.27
412.36
PS7002Q03 Cooking
Explaining phenomena scientifically Environment Global RSM 1.35
656.30
PS7002Q04 Cooking Using scientific evidence Natural resources Social RSM -1.11
427.65
PS7012Q01 First aid
Explaining phenomena scientifically Health Personal PS 1 0.77
602.77
PS7012Q03 First Aid
Explaining phenomena scientifically Health Personal PS 1 -0.19
512.97
PS7012Q04T First aid
Explaining phenomena scientifically Health Personal PS 1 -0.77
458.70
PS7013Q01 Ocean currents Using scientific evidence
Frontiers of science and technology Global PS 1 -0.65
470.64
PS7013Q02 Ocean currents
Explaining phenomena scientifically Hazard Social PS 1 -0.62
473.53
PS7014Q01 Oil spills Using scientific evidence Hazard Social PS 1 -0.53 -0.04 0.04 434.83 528.08
PS7014Q03 Oil spills Explaining phenomena scientifically Health Social PS 1 0.87
611.63
PS7017Q01 Galileo's clock Identifying scientific issues
Frontiers of science and technology Personal PS 2 0.33
561.18
PS7017Q04D Galileo's clock Identifying scientific issues
Frontiers of science and technology Personal PS 2 1.74
692.66
PS7018Q03 Watering cattle Using scientific evidence
Frontiers of science and technology Personal PS 1 1.16
638.58
202
Unit Item
Code Unit Name Competency Application Area
Context
setting area Cluster Delta tau1 tau2 Thresholds
PS7018Q04T Watering cattle Using scientific evidence Frontiers of science and technology Personal PS 1 1.01 1.03 -1.03 608.27 641.84
PS7020Q03 Stone pots Explaining phenomena scientifically Natural resources Social PS 2 -0.35
498.24
PS7020Q04 Stone pots
Explaining phenomena scientifically Natural resources Social PS 2 0.69
595.41
PS7021Q02T Sterilised milk Identifying scientific issues Health Social RSM 0.89
613.50
PS7021Q04T Sterilised milk Identifying scientific issues Environment Social RSM 0.56
583.28
PS7201Q01 Water Purification Using scientific evidence Hazard Social PS 1 0.15
545.14
PS7201Q02 Water Purification Identifying scientific issues Health Social PS 1 -0.54
480.80
PS7201Q03 Water Purification Using scientific evidence Hazard Social PS 1 2.40
754.30
PS7205Q02 Plate Tectonics Using scientific evidence Hazard Global PS 2 0.10
540.20
PS7208Q01
Identifying Substances Using scientific evidence Frontiers of science and technology
Personal PS 1 -0.11
521.09
PS7208Q02
Identifying Substances Identifying scientific issues Frontiers of science and technology
Personal PS 1 0.96
620.77
PS7211Q01
Ceramics Explaining phenomena scientifically
Natural resources Global PS 1 1.43
664.41
PS7211Q02T
Ceramics Using scientific evidence Frontiers of science and technology
Social PS 1 0.45
572.75
PS7212Q01
Nitrogen in Rocks Explaining phenomena scientifically
Natural resources Global PS 2 0.33
561.56
PS7212Q02
Nitrogen in Rocks Explaining phenomena scientifically
Natural resources Global PS 2 0.44
571.81
PS7212Q04 Nitrogen in Rocks Identifying scientific issues Natural resources Global PS 2 2.89
799.99
203
Unit Item
Code Unit Name Competency Application Area
Context
setting area Cluster Delta tau1 tau2 Thresholds
PS7215Q02 Blood Clotting
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Health Personal PS 2 1.33
654.99
PS7215Q03
Blood Clotting Explaining phenomena scientifically
Health Social PS 2 0.94
618.72
PS7216Q01
Fish Management Explaining phenomena scientifically
Natural resources Global RSM -0.18
514.09
PS7216Q03 Fish Management Using scientific evidence Natural resources Global RSM 1.09 -0.21 0.21 578.43 686.60
PS7217Q01T Ocean Debris
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Environment Social PS 1 -0.63
471.94
PS7217Q02
Ocean Debris Explaining phenomena scientifically
Environment Global PS 1 0.81 -0.66 0.66 527.15 686.60
PS7220Q01 Natural Gas
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Hazard Social PS 1 -1.02
435.58
PS7220Q02T Natural Gas Identifying scientific issues Environment Social PS 1 -0.37
496.84
PS7220Q03 Natural Gas Identifying scientific issues Natural resources Social PS 1 0.26
554.84
PS7221Q01
Clean Drinking Water Explaining phenomena scientifically
Health Personal PS 2 -3.05
246.19
PS7221Q02
Clean Drinking Water Explaining phenomena scientifically
Frontiers of science and technology
Social PS 2 0.50 -0.47 0.47 509.43 646.51
PS7221Q03T Clean Drinking Water
Explaining phenomena scientifically
Health Personal PS 2 0.01
532.00
PS7221Q04
Clean Drinking Water Explaining phenomena scientifically
Health Social PS 2 -2.51
296.92
PS7222Q01 Texan Summer Identifying scientific issues Environment Social PS 2 -1.94
350.35
PS7222Q02T Texan Summer Using scientific evidence Environment Global PS 2 1.07
630.93
PS7222Q03T Texan Summer Using scientific evidence Environment Global PS 2 -0.35
498.33
204
Unit Item
Code Unit Name Competency Application Area
Context
setting area Cluster Delta tau1 tau2 Thresholds
PS7224Q02T Moon Rock Using scientific evidence
Frontiers of science and technology
Global PS 2 1.91
709.08
PS7228Q02 C-Dating
Using scientific evidence Frontiers of science and technology
Global PS 2 0.89
613.40
PS7228Q03 C-Dating
Using scientific evidence Frontiers of science and technology
Global PS 2 0.85
609.77
PS7228Q04 C-Dating
Using scientific evidence Frontiers of science and technology
Personal PS 2 0.53
580.30
PS7230Q02T Pesticides Using scientific evidence Hazard Social PS 1 -0.45
488.73
PS7230Q03T Pesticides Identifying scientific issues Hazard Social PS 1 1.41
661.98
PS7231Q01T Pollen Allergy Using scientific evidence Health Social PS 2 0.78
603.89
PS7231Q04T Pollen Allergy Identifying scientific issues Health Social PS 2 0.66
591.96