Austman Et Al 2010 Fraser Lakes Zone B Thermobarometry
-
Upload
christine-mckechnie -
Category
Documents
-
view
202 -
download
2
Transcript of Austman Et Al 2010 Fraser Lakes Zone B Thermobarometry
Fraser Lakes Zone B mineralized granitic pegmatites and their pelitic hosts: Mineral chemis-
try, stoichiometry, and geothermobarometry
AUSTMAN, Christine L.1
, ANNESLEY, Irvine R.1,2
, and ANSDELL, Kevin M.1
(1) Department of Geological Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK Canada S7N 5E2 (E-mail: [email protected]);
(2) JNR Resources Inc., Saskatoon, SK, Canada S7K 0G6
References Andersen, D.J., and Lindsley, D.H., 1985. New (and final!) models for the Ti-magnetite/ilmenite geothermometer and oxygen barometer: Abstract AGU 1985 Spring Meeting Eos Transactions. American Geophysical Union 66 (18), 416.
Annesley, I.R., Madore, C. and Portella, P., 2005, Geology and thermotectonic evolution of the western margin of the Trans-Hudson Orogen: evidence from the eastern sub-Athabasca basement, Saskatchewan: Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 42, 573-597.
Annesley, I., Cutford, C., Billard, D., Kusmirski, R., Wasyliuk, K., Bogdan, T., Sweet, K., and Ludwig, C., 2009, Fraser Lakes Zones A and B, Way Lake Project, Saskatchewan: Geological, geophysical, and geochemical characteristics of basement-hosted mineralization: Proceedings of the 24th International Applied Geochemistry
Symposium (IAGS), Fredericton, NB. Conference Abstract Vol.1. p. 409-414.
Annesley, I.R., Creighton, S., Mercadier, J., Bonli, T., and Austman, C.L., 2010, Composition and U-Th-Pb chemical ages of uranium and thorium mineralization at Fraser Lakes, northern Saskatchewan, Canada: GeoCanada 2010, Calgary, Canada, May 2010, Extended Abstract.
Austman, C.L., Ansdell, K.M., and Annesley, I.R., 2009, Granitic pegmatite- and leucogranite-hosted uranium mineralization adjacent to the Athabasca Basin, Saskatchewan, Canada: A different target for uranium exploration: Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 41, No. 7, p. 83.
Austman, C.L., Ansdell, K.M., and Annesley, I.R., 2010a, Petrography and geochemistry of granitic pegmatite and leucogranite- hosted uranium & thorium mineralization: Fraser Lakes Zone B, northern Saskatchewan, Canada: GeoCanada 2010, Calgary, Canada, May 2010, Extended Abstract.
Austman, C.L., Ansdell, K.M., and Annesley, I.R., 2010b, Mineralogy, geochemistry and economic potential of granitic pegmatite- and leucogranite-hosted uranium, thorium and REE mineralization adjacent to the Athabasca Basin, Saskatchewan, Canada: SEG 2010, Keystone, CO, USA, October 2010, Extended Abstract.
Berman, R.G., 1988, Internally-Consistent Thermodynamic Data for Minerals in the System Na2O-K2O-CaO-MgO-FeO-Fe2O3-Al2O3-SiO2-TiO2-H2O-CO2: J. Petrology, 29, 445-522.
Elkins, L.T., and Grove, T.L., 1990, Ternary feldspar experiments and thermodynamic models: Amer. Min., 75, 544-559
Eric, S., Logar, M., Milovanovic, D., Babic, D., and Adnadeic, B.,2009, Ti-in-biotite geothermometry in non-graphitic, peraluminous metapelites from Crni vrh and Resavski humovi (Central Serbia): Geologica Carpathica, 60, 3-14.
Ganguly, J., Cheng, W. and Tirone, M. (1996) Thermodynamics of aluminosilicate garnet solid solution: new experimental data, an optimized model, and thermometric applications. Contrib.. Mineral. Petrol., 126, 137-151 (pdf file)
Ganguly, J., 2010, Index of /~ganguly/pub/P-T_Calc: Viewed: November 15, 2010, <http://geo.arizona.edu/~ganguly/pub/P-T_Calc/>
Ghiorso, M.S., and Evans, B.W., 2008, Thermodynamics of rhombohedral oxide solid solutions and a revision of the Fe-Ti two-oxide geothermometer and oxygen-barometer: Amer. Jour. Sci., 308, 957–1039.
Henry, D. J., Guidotti, C.V., and Thomson, J.A., 2005, The Ti-saturation surface for low-to-medium pressure metapelitic biotites: Implications for geothermometry and Ti-substitution mechanisms: Amer. Min., 90, 316-328.
JNR Resources Inc., 2010, —Home Page—Nov. 20, 2010: JNR Resources Inc., Saskatoon, SK Canada, <http://www.jnrresources.com>, Last accessed: Nov. 20, 2010.
Ko, C.B., 1971, Geological Report on Dynamic Petroleums Products Ltd . CBS 1837, Sask. N.T.S.: 74H-2-SW, Assessment Report, Great Plains Development Company of Canada, Ltd., 1-23.
Koziol, A.M., and Newton, R.C., 1988, Redetermination of the anorthite breakdown reaction and improvement of the plagioclase-garnet-Al2SiO5-quartz geobarometer: Amer. Min., 73, 216-233.
Kretz, R., 1983, Symbols for rock-forming minerals: American Mineralogist, 68, 277-279.
Lentz, D. 1992, Petrogenesis of U-, Th-, Mo- and REE-bearing Pegmatites, Skarns, and Veins in the Central Metasedimentary Belt of the Grenville Province, Ontario and Quebec. Ph.D. thesis, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario.
Lepage, L, 2003, ILMAT: an Excel worksheet for ilmenite–magnetite geothermometry and geobarometry: Comp. and Geosci., 29, 673-678.
O’Neill, H. St.C., and Pownceby, M. L., 1993, Thermodynamic data from redox reactions at high temperatures. I. An experimental and theoretical assessment of the electro-chemical method using stabilized zirconia electrolytes, with revised values for the Fe-―FeO‖, Co-CoO, Ni-NiO, and Cu-Cu2O oxygen buffers, and new data for the
W-WO2 buffer: Cont. to Min. and Pet., 114, 296–314.
Ray, G.E., 1980, Geology of the Parker Lake-Nelson Lake Vicinity: Map 190A to accompany Sask. Geol. Surv. Rept. No. 190.
Tindle, A.G., 2010, Andy Tindle - Free Software (Mineral Recalculation Software): Available from: <http://www.open.ac.uk/earth-research/tindle/AGTWebPages/AGTSoft.html>, Last accessed: November 19, 2010
Acknowledgements The authors acknowledge the financial support of JNR Resources Inc., NSERC (Discovery Grant to Ansdell) and the University of Saskatchewan (Department Heads Research Grant to Ansdell and Graduate Scholarship to Austman). Thanks to Blaine Novakovski for preparing the thin sections, to Kimberly Bradley from JNR Re-
sources Inc. for her assistance with petrography, and Steven Creighton for his assistance with the electron microprobe work.
Purpose: to obtain estimates of the pressures and temperatures of regional metamorphism in the area
and determine the relationship of regional metamorphism to pegmatite intrusion.
Conclusions The host rocks to the Fraser Lakes granitic pegmatite-hosted U-Th-REE
mineralization underwent regional metamorphism up to lower granulite
facies, based on the presence of key indicator minerals including spinel,
sillimanite, and cordierite in the pelitic gneisses, and orthopyroxene in the
Archean orthogneisses
Relict kyanite in the pelitic gneisses indicates that the rock experienced
conditions that enabled it to form during the prograde part of its P-T path
The maximum pressure that the pelitic gneisses experienced during
metamorphism was up to ~7.6 kbar at temperatures of up to ~ 760 °C
Pegmatite crystallization began at 750 - 830 °C with the oxide minerals, and
feldspars and quartz crystallizing later at lower temperatures (>500 °C for
similar pegmatites in the Grenville Province (Lentz 1992))
Similarity of pegmatite intrusion temperatures to maximum metamorphic
temperatures agrees with other evidence (Austman et al. 2009, 2010 a, b)
that the mineralized granitic pegmatites formed by partial melting of pelitic
gneisses ± orthogneisses during regional metamorphism
Future work will include additional microprobe analyses of pegmatites
(biotite, magnetite-ilmenite, feldspar) and pelitic gneisses (cordierite, spinel,
garnet, biotite) in order to further constrain pressures and temperatures of
regional metamorphism and pegmatite crystallization
Location of the study area
Regional Geology
Area is underlain by Archean orthogneisses,
Wollaston Group metasedimentary rocks (pelitic
gneisses ± graphite, psammopelitic gneisses, and
calc-silicate gneisses), and Hudsonian intrusives
(Fig. 2) that were complexly deformed and
metamorphosed during the Trans-Hudson
Orogen ~1.8 Ga (Annesley et al. 2009)
Two mineralized zones, A and B (see Fig. 2), are
hosted by NE-plunging regional fold structures
adjacent to a 65 km long folded electromagnetic
(EM) conductor (Annesley et al. 2009)
At Zone B, the uranium and thorium
mineralization is located in a ~500 m x 1500 m
area NW of the Fraser Lakes in an antiformal
fold nose cross-cut by E-W ductile-brittle and
NNW- and NNE-trending brittle structures (Fig. 2,
3, Annesley et al. 2009)
Multiple generations of pegmatites including
syn-tectonic (subcordant to gneissosity, often
radioactive) and post-tectonic (discordant, non-
mineralized) pegmatites intrude the Archean-
Wollaston Group contact (Austman et al. 2009)
Pegmatites in the western part of the fold nose are
U and Th-enriched (Th/U ~1; up to 0.242% U3O8 with
0.254% ThO2 over 0.5 m in drill core), while those in
the eastern part are Th + LREE-enriched with vari-
able U (Th/U ~ 2-20; up to 0.109% ThO2 with 0.013%
U3O8 over 7.0 m in drill core) (JNR Resources Inc.,
2010)
The presence of migmatites, melt-textures in thin
section, geochemical trends between the pegmatites and
pelitic gneisses, and initial U-Th-Pb chemical age
dating of the pegmatites (1795 ± 15 Ma, Annesley et al.
(2010)) suggests that the pegmatites formed by partial
melting of pelitic gneisses ± Archean orthogneisses in
the middle to lower crust during the Trans-Hudson
Orogen (Austman et al. 2009, 2010 a, b)
Methodology Several samples of Fraser Lakes Zone B drill core and outcrop were prepared for petrological studies. Of these samples, one
granitic pegmatite (WYL-10-61-190.3) and two pelitic gneiss thin sections (WYL-09-49-36.1; WYL-09-37.5) were
selected for initial electron microprobe analysis and conventional geothermobarometry. All microprobe analyses were com-
pleted at Saskatchewan Research Council’s Geoanalytical Laboratories using a Cameca SX-100 electron microprobe. Pres-
sure and temperature constraints are given by a combination of mineral assemblage data and conventional
geothermobarometry.
Fraser Lakes Zones A and B are located in JNR Resource’s Way
Lake Property (Fig. 1 - modified map from JNR Resources Inc.,
2010) in northern Saskatchewan, ~ 25 km from the SE edge of the
Athabasca Basin and ~ 55 km from the Key Lake Uranium Mine
Fig. 3. Geological map of the Fraser Lakes Zone B area showing the presence of multiple
pegmatites (red and blue) at/near the contact between Archean orthogneisses (orange and
purple) and Wollaston Group metasedimentary rocks (green). Modified from Ko, 1971.
Abstract The Fraser Lakes Zone B U-Th-REE mineralized granitic
pegmatites intruded into the highly deformed contact
between the Wollaston Group pelitic gneisses and
Archean orthogneisses during the Trans-Hudson Orogen
~1.8 Ga. The host pelitic gneisses and orthogneisses were
metamorphosed to lower granulite facies, at a maximum
temperature of about 765 °C and maximum pressure of
around 7.5 kbar, while the granitic pegmatites were
intruded at a temperature of 700- 800°C. The pelitic
gneisses later underwent at least one period of retrograde
metamorphism at approximately 700-730 °C (5.6-7.1 kbar
pressure). The similarity of intrusion temperatures to
metamorphic temperatures agrees with other evidence
which suggests that intrusion of the pegmatites was
related to regional metamorphism and migmatization of
the Wollaston Group in the Fraser Lakes area.
Fig.1
Mineral Assemblages
Pelitic Gneisses Granitic Pegmatites
Fig. 2 Regional geological map of the Fraser Lakes area. Modified from Ray (1980).
Major minerals
(primary): quartz, biotite,
plagioclase, and k-feldspar
Other primary minerals:
± titanomagnetite
(pegmatites in Archean
orthogneisses only), ±
ilmenite, ± pyrite, ±
chalcopyrite, ± rutile, ±
titanite, ± fluorite, ±
molybdenite, ± apatite, ±
garnet, ± graphite,
pyrrhotite, ± pentlandite
Radioactive accessory
Minerals (primary): ±
uraninite, ± uranothorite,
± zircon, ± monazite, ±
allanite
Alteration assemblage: ±
chlorite, ± muscovite, ±
clay minerals, ± hematite,
± pyrite, ± fluorite, ±
galena
Metamorphic minerals:
Plagioclase, quartz, biotite,
± k-feldspar, ± garnet, ±
cordierite, ± sillimanite, ±
graphite, ± ilmenite, ±
spinel, ± kyanite, ± zircon,
± monazite, ± uraninite, ±
apatite, ± pyrite, ± other
sulphides and oxides
Alteration assemblage:
± chlorite, ± muscovite, ±
clay minerals, ± hematite, ±
pyrite, ± fluorite, ± rutile
Sample # Rock type Methods Maximum
Pressure
(core)
Retrograde
Pressures (rim)
Average max T°C
(core)
Retrograde T°
C (rim)
Max T°C of
intrusion
log10 f(O2)
WYL-09-49
-36.1
Sill-Gt-Bt-
bearing pelitic
gneiss
Ti-Bt(T1), Gt-Bt
(T2), GASP (P1,
P2)
~7.2 kbar
(@ 765 °C,
P1);
~5.6 kbar (@
702 °C, P1);
765 °C (T1) ~ 700 °C (T1) n/a n/a
WYL-09-50
-37.5
Sill-Crd-Spl-Gt-
Bt-Gr-bearing
pelitic gneiss
Ti-in-Bt(T1), Gt-
Bt(T2), GASP
(P1, P2)
~7.6 kbar
(@ 750 °C,
P1)
~6.8 -7.1 kbar
(@709 °C - 730
°C, P1)
750 °C (T1) 709 - 730 °C
(T1)
n/a n/a
WYL-09-61
-190.3
Magnetite-
bearing Granitic
Pegmatite
Mgt-Ilm (T2,
T3), f(O2) (1, 2)
n/a n/a n/a n/a ~ 831 °C (T2);
706 - 828°C
(T3)
~ -1.92 relative to
NNO (f1);
-17.99 to -15.18 (f2)
Models:
T1: Titanium-in-Bt
geothermometer of Henry
(2005); applied to non-graphitic
pelites by Eric (2009).
T3, f(O2)2:
Magnetite-ilmenite geothermometer
and f(O2) geobarometer of Anderson
and Lindsley (1985) calculated using
ILMAT (Lepage 2003). The large
range of temperatures is due to
differences in the calculation of the
molecular fraction of ulvospinel and
ilmenite.
P1: GASP1.EXE program available from Ganguly
(2010), which uses thermodynamic properties from
Berman (1988) and experimental data from Koziol and
Newton (1988) for the pure end-member GASP reaction.
Thermodynamic solution models are from Ganguly et al.
(1996) (garnet) and Elkins and Grove (1990)
(Plagioclase). Ti-in-biotite temperatures (T1) from
co-existing biotite were used in the calculations.
T2, f(O2)1:
Magnetite-Ilmenite geother-
mometer and f(O2) geobarometer
of Ghiorso and Evans (2008); f
(O2) is relative to NNO of O'Neill
and Pownceby (1993).
Observed Mineral Reactions in Pelitic Gneisses
Results of Initial Conventional Geothermobarometry
Fig. 12.
Boudinaged
felsic melt pods
with garnet
cores from
WYL-09-37
(~190.0 m).
Fig. 14. Pelitic gneiss (WYL-09-50-
37.5) with quartz, plagioclase,
biotite , spinel (Spl), sillimanite,
cordierite (Crd), graphite (Gr), and
monazite. This thin section also
contains garnet and k-feldspar.
Fig. 5. Outcrop (Trench 2) of a typical radioactive
granitic pegmatite showing coarse grain size and
plagioclase- (Plag), biotite- (Bt), and quartz- (Qtz)
rich mineralogy. Abbreviations after Kretz (1983).
Fig. 4. Radioactive granitic pegmatite from drill hole
WYL-09-44. Pegmatite shows zoning, from a
plagioclase-rich core through k-feldspar and quartz-
rich zones.
Fig. 11. Drill core from WYL-10-61 showing
compositional variation in the pelitic gneiss
(including graphite-cordierite-sillimanite-rich
layers) and local boudinaged felsic melt pods.
Fig. 13. Pelitic gneiss (WYL-09-49-36.1) con-
taining biotite, garnet, sillimanite, monazite,
quartz, and feldspar.
Fig. 15. Pelitic Gneiss (WYL-10-61-78.1)
with altered cordierite, biotite, sillimanite,
feldspar, and quartz
Fig. 16. Pelitic gneiss (WYL-09-49-)
contains sillimanite after kyanite,
with some remnant sillimanite left.
Fig. 17. Qualitative P-T
diagram for the pelitic
gneisses from the Fraser
Lakes Zone B area
showing an approximate
clockwise metamorphic P
-T path based on mineral
assemblages and
reactions observed in
thin section. Numbers
on the diagram
correspond to the
numbered reactions in
the adjacent table of
observed reactions.
(Diagram is modified
from Fig. 5 of Annesley
et al. 2005).
Fig. 7.
Biotite (Bt),
zircon
(Zrn), and
uraninite-
rich
granitic
pegmatite
(sample
Trench 2-2).
Fig. 6. Granitic
pegmatite
(WYL-10-61-
190.3) with
magnetite
(Mgt), ilmenite
(Ilm), and
uraninite (Urn)
intrusive into
Archean
orthogneisses.
Fig. 10. Arial view (looking
NE) of the Fraser Lakes
Zone B area.
Fig. 8. Quartz- rich,
radioactive granitic
pegmatite (outcrop sample).
Note the radiation cracks
surrounding the altered
uraninite (Urn) grain.
Fig. 9 Biotite- and monazite-
rich pegmatite (WYL-09-46
-83.0) with thorite (Thr) and
zircon (Zrn).
1. Bt + Sil +Qtz = Grt +Kfs + melt
2. Bt + Sil +Qtz = Grt +Crd +Kfs + melt
3. Bt + Sil + Qtz = Pl + Grt + Kfs + melt
4. Bt + Sil + Qtz + Pl = Grt + Crd ± Kfs +melt
5. Bt + Sil + Qtz + Pl = Crd ± Kfs + melt
6. Grt + Sil = Crd + Qtz ± Kfs
7. Grt + Sil = Crd + Spl + Ilm
Selected Mineral Chemistry and Stoichiometry
Note: Mineral stoichiometry for all minerals was calculated using Andy Tindle’s mineral re-calculation Excel
spreadsheets (Tindle, 2010)
Sample: WYL-09-50-37.5 WYL-09-49-36.1
Mineral (Core/
Rim;
interpretation)
Bt
(matrix,
peak)
Bt
(matrix,
peak)
Bt (C adj.
Gt;
retrogr.)
Gt (C;
peak?)
Gt (R;
retro.)
Pl (C;
matrix)
Pl (R;
matrix)
Bt (in
gt;
peak?)
Bt (adj.
Gt;
retro.)
Gt (C;
peak)
Gt
(C2, ?)
Gt (R;
retro.)
PL (C;
matrix,
peak?)
Pl (R;
matrix,
retro)
SiO2 35.57 35.93 36.15 SiO2 37.89 38.27 SiO2 64.04 64.04 SiO2 36.32 35.80 SiO2 37.63 37.88 37.60 SiO2 60.78 61.47
TiO2 4.77 4.77 3.96 TiO2 0.03 0.01 TiO2 0.00 0.00 TiO2 5.23 3.49 TiO2 0.03 0.00 0.03 TiO2 0.00 0.00
Al2O3 17.74 17.68 17.62 Al2O3 21.49 21.87 Al2O3 22.52 22.48 Al2O3 17.62 18.42 Al2O3 21.57 21.52 21.49 Al2O3 24.07 24.09
FeO 17.09 17.73 17.13 FeO 34.09 32.91 FeO 0.06 0.05 FeO 16.41 18.23 FeO 34.06 34.04 34.02 FeO 0.04 0.02
MnO 0.03 0.03 0.00 MnO 0.57 0.51 MnO 0.00 0.00 MnO 0.02 0.04 MnO 1.43 1.40 1.52 MnO 0.00 0.00
MgO 9.64 9.83 10.71 MgO 4.02 4.84 MgO 0.00 0.00 MgO 10.70 9.29 MgO 3.30 3.39 2.87 MgO 0.00 0.00
CaO 0.00 0.00 0.00 CaO 0.57 0.63 CaO 3.31 3.33 CaO 0.00 0.00 CaO 1.05 1.04 0.93 CaO 5.58 5.51
Na2O 0.14 0.12 0.14 Na2O 0.02 0.02 BaO 0.00 0.00 Na2O 0.32 0.17 Na2O 0.01 0.01 0.02 BaO 0.01 0.00
K2O 10.02 10.21 10.04 ZnO 0.02 0.01 Na2O 11.13 11.08 K2O 9.93 9.98 ZnO 0.01 0.01 0.01 Na2O 9.66 9.63
BaO 0.00 0.03 0.08 Cr2O3 0.02 0.02 K2O 0.26 0.22 BaO 0.05 0.07 Cr2O3 0.03 0.02 0.03 K2O 0.26 0.18
Cs2O 0.00 0.00 0.00 Y2O3 0.03 0.04 TOTAL 101.33 101.20 Cs2O 0.01 0.00 Y2O3 0.00 0.01 0.10 TOTAL 100.41 100.90
F 0.60 0.46 0.59 V2O3 0.00 0.02 F 1.24 1.16 V2O3 0.03 0.01 0.00
Cl 0.02 0.02 0.02 TOTAL 98.76 99.14 Si 11.23 11.24 Cl 0.08 0.07 TOTAL 99.14 99.34 98.61 Si 10.83 10.87
Li2O* 0.66 0.76 0.82 Al 4.66 4.65 Li2O* 0.87 0.72 Al 5.05 5.02
H2O* 3.69 3.81 3.75 Si 3.02 3.02 Ti 0.00 0.00 H2O* 3.47 3.43 Si 3.01 3.02 3.02 Ti 0.00 0.00
O=F,Cl 0.26 0.20 0.25 Al iv 0.00 0.00 Fe 0.01 0.01 O=F,Cl 0.54 0.50 Al iv 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fe 0.01 0.00
Total 99.71 101.20 100.76 Al vi 2.03 2.05 Mn 0.00 0.00 Total 101.73 100.37 Al vi 2.04 2.03 2.05 Mn 0.00 0.00
Ti 0.00 0.00 Mg 0.00 0.00 Ti 0.00 0.00 0.00 Mg 0.00 0.00
Si 5.35 5.34 5.38 Cr 0.00 0.00 Ca 0.62 0.63 Si 5.33 5.37 Cr 0.00 0.00 0.00 Ca 1.07 1.05
Al iv 2.65 2.66 2.62 Fe2+ 2.35 2.26 Na 3.78 3.77 Al iv 2.67 2.63 Fe2+ 2.35 2.34 2.38 Na 3.33 3.30
Al vi 0.50 0.44 0.46 Mn 0.04 0.03 K 0.06 0.05 Al vi 0.39 0.63 Mn 0.10 0.09 0.10 K 0.06 0.04
Ti 0.54 0.53 0.44 Mg 0.48 0.57 Ba 0.00 0.00 Ti 0.58 0.39 Mg 0.39 0.40 0.34 Ba 0.00 0.00
Fe 2.15 2.20 2.13 Ni 0.00 0.00 Total 20.36 20.34 Fe 2.02 2.29 Ni 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 20.34 20.29
Mn 0.00 0.00 0.00 Zn 0.00 0.00 Mn 0.00 0.01 Zn 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mg 2.16 2.18 2.38 Ca 0.05 0.05 An (%) 13.93 14.10 Mg 2.34 2.08 Ca 0.09 0.09 0.08 An (%) 23.89 23.82
Li* 0.40 0.45 0.49 Total 7.98 7.98 Ab (%) 84.75 84.77 Li* 0.51 0.44 Total 7.99 7.98 7.98 Ab (%) 74.77 75.28
Ca 0.00 0.00 0.00 Or (%) 1.33 1.12 Ca 0.00 0.00 Or (%) 1.34 0.90
Na 0.04 0.04 0.04 Almandine 80.62 77.49 Na 0.09 0.05 Almandine 80.24 79.97 81.90
K 1.92 1.94 1.90 Andradite 0.00 0.00 K 1.86 1.91 Andradite 0.00 0.00 0.00
Sr 0.00 0.00 0.00 Grossular 1.60 1.77 Sr 0.00 0.00 Grossular 2.97 2.97 2.64
Ba 0.00 0.00 0.00 Pyrope 16.39 19.52 Ba 0.00 0.00 Pyrope 13.41 13.77 11.81
Cs 0.00 0.00 0.00 Spessartine 1.32 1.16 Cs 0.00 0.00 Spessartine 3.29 3.23 3.55
OH* 3.71 3.78 3.72 Uvarovite 0.07 0.05 OH* 3.40 3.43 Uvarovite 0.10 0.07 0.10
F 0.29 0.22 0.28 F 0.58 0.55
Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cl 0.02 0.02
TOTAL 19.72 19.79 19.86 TOTAL 19.80 19.80
Sample: WYL-10-61-190.3
Mineral: Titanomagnetite
Ilmenite (inclusion,
primary)
SiO2 0.09 0.00
TiO2 17.84 49.79
Al2O3 9.12 0.01
Fe2O3 0.00 0.00
Cr2O3 0.01 0.00
FeO 70.56 44.81
MnO 2.08 4.04
MgO 0.08 0.00
CaO 0.00 0.00
ZnO 1.43 0.00
V2O3 0.05 0.06
NiO 0.04 0.00
TOTAL 101.30 98.71
Si 0.03 0.00
Al 3.27 0.00
Ti 4.08 1.94
Fe 17.95 1.94
Mn 0.54 0.18
Mg 0.04 0.00
Zn 0.32 0.00
Ca 0.00 0.00
Cr 0.00 0.00
Ni 0.01 0.00
V 0.01 0.00
Total 26.24 4.06
Pelitic gneisses
Pegmatites
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 18-21. Backscatter electron images of the pelitic gneiss samples showing the location of
selected microprobe analysis points shown in the adjacent table. Fig. 18+ 19 are from
sample WYL-09-50-37.5 while Figs. 20 + 21 are from sample WYL-09-49-36.1.