Austin Ctea Expo

31
Solar Industry Market Projections and Lessons Learned Austin CTEA Expo Iga Hallberg - Vice President Business Development

description

I recently presented on The Growing Competitiveness of Solar Power

Transcript of Austin Ctea Expo

Page 1: Austin Ctea Expo

Solar Industry Market Projections and Lessons Learned

Austin CTEA Expo

Iga Hallberg -Vice President Business Development

Page 2: Austin Ctea Expo

Energy Generation and the Terawatt (TW) Challenge• Humanity uses 12 TW of power today

– 1 TW = 1,000 GW (Gigawatts)

• World will need 15 TW by 2012

• Only 5 known sources of energy are available on a TW scale*– Fossil fuels: Coal, oil, gas

– Nuclear fuels

– Solar• Only inherently distributed solution

• No fuel cost

*Prof. Nathan Lewis, http://nsl.caltech.edu/

Page 3: Austin Ctea Expo

Global solar resources

3

Page 4: Austin Ctea Expo

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000

16,000

18,000

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

E

2011

E

2012

E

32%45% 35% 29% 25%

42%

6% 9%

17%

22%

26%

Inst

alla

tion

s (M

W)

Germany Spain Italy ROE Japan S. Korea China ROW US

Policy Driven DemandUS % growth

Source: Barclays, IEA, Navigant

Historical Trends• 49% growth • 45% growth ex-Spain 2008

0%

50%

100%

150%

YOY Global Demand Growth

German FITSpanish

RDC

Recession

US ITC

Page 5: Austin Ctea Expo

Growing Competitiveness of Solar

Source: McKinsey.(1) kWh = kilowatt hour; kWp = kilowatt peak; TWh = terawatt hour; Wp = watt peak; the annual solar yield is the amount of electricity

generated by a south-facing 1 kW peak-rated module in 1 year, or the equivalent number of hours that the module operates at peak rating.(2) Tier 4 and 5 are names of regulated forms of electricity generation and usage.(3) Unsubsidized cost to end users of solar energy equals cost of conventional electricity.

Annual solar energy yield (kWh/kWp(1))

Grid Parity as of(3)

Today

Size of electricity market TWh a year(1)

Aver

age

pow

er p

rice

per h

ouse

hold

($/k

Wh(

1))

1,000 1,500 2,000500

$0.3

$0.2

$0.1

$0.0

Cos

t per

wat

t at p

eak

hour

s ($

/Wp(

1))

China

India

Greece

Texas

Australia

SpainNew YorkFranceFinland

Japan

Germany

Sweden

Netherlands

Denmark

California Tier 4(2)

2020

California Tier 5(2)

Hawaii

Italy

California

$8.0

$6.0

$4.0

$2.0

Norway

United Kingdom

South Korea

Page 6: Austin Ctea Expo

Northern Suburb of Tokyo

Page 7: Austin Ctea Expo

Source: Christopher O’Brien of Sharp Solar at EESI climate change meeting 2005

Example of successful long term solar incentives

Page 8: Austin Ctea Expo

In deregulated regions, fuel price depends on the marginal fuel

Marginal Fuel Type for Electricity Production

RMP

Source: Energy Velocity, NERC ES&D

Hydro

Coal

Natural Gas

Primary Fuel Type

Petro

Discussion

Prices of the fuel type that sets the marginal price of electricity most impact electricity price

Natural gas sets the price for electricity in the Northeast, California, and Texas

This coincides with the regions with the highest average electricity prices and regions with deregulated markets

Deregulated Regions

Page 9: Austin Ctea Expo

Solar Systems Around the WorldUtility Scale Commercial Roof Top Systems

Google HQ - CaliforniaSolar farm - Germany

Austin City HallResidential roof - California

Building Integrated

Hong Kong Science Center

11

Page 10: Austin Ctea Expo

Atlantic City Convention Center, NJ2.3MW Largest rooftop solar PV project in North America

12

Page 11: Austin Ctea Expo

Example: Correlation between Daily PV Power Production and Energy Consumption of an Office Building in Spain

24h-Energy Profile

0:00

6:00

12:0

0

18:0

0

24:0

0

Elec

tric

al E

nerg

y [a

rb. u

nits

]

Low Tariff Low TariffHigh Tariff

Electricity supplied by Utility

Fed-InEnergy

Solar Energy

Energy consumption of building

Electricity supplied by Utility

Source: RWE Energie AG and RSS GmbH

13

Page 12: Austin Ctea Expo

Opportunities for a More Efficient Products and Value Chain

14

Customer

Installer

Power Purchase Agreement

Financing

If buy power

LLC

Financing

If own system

Integrator/ System Designer

Future Integrated Products

Opportunity for Integration & System

Cost Reduction

Opportunity forPre-engineered

SolutionsPV Module

Mfgr

Mounting & Wiring

System Mfgr

Inverter Mfgr

Page 13: Austin Ctea Expo

Solar Product Availability• Crystalline Silicon ~ 18% conversion efficiency

• Multi-crystalline Silicon ~ 14%

• Amorphous Silicon ~ 6-8%– Flexible and rigid

• Cadmium Telluride ~ 9-10%– First Solar capturing significant market share for

central power applications

• CIS/CIGS ~10-12%– New commercial availability entering the market

in 2010

85% of current market

15% of current marketbut fastest growing segment

15

Page 14: Austin Ctea Expo

Chronology of Polysilicon Dynamics –2006-2009

Source: Barclays

Page 15: Austin Ctea Expo

Competitive Manufacturing Cost Potential is Key!

Source: Greentech Media and Prometheus Institute.

$1.2

6

$0.9

8

$0.8

9

$0.8

0

$61

$174

$100

$54$76

$105

$52

$65

$0.00

$0.50

$1.00

$1.50

$2.00

$2.50

$3.00

$3.50

2008E 2010E 2012E 2015E

Asia Multi-Si Euro Multi-Si Integ. Multi-Si Super Mono Si a-Si CdTe CIGS

Asia Poly($/kg)

Euro Poly($/kg)

Page 16: Austin Ctea Expo

HelioVolt Confidential and Proprietary 18

Thin Film Process vs. AlternativesHelioVolt Process

Glass In Module Out

GlassPreparation

FASST® CIGSProcess

ModuleFormation

Final Assembly& Test

Competitors’ CIGS Cell-Based Processes

Substrate In Module Out

SubstratePreparation

CIGSProcess

Contact & GridFormation

Cell Cut & Sort Cell Stringing

Silicon Process

Polysilicon Ingot Wafer Solar Cell Solar Module

Final Assembly& Test

Source: Wall Street research.

Page 17: Austin Ctea Expo

Final Assembly& Test

ModuleFormation

FASST® CIGSProcess

GlassPreparation

HelioVolt Module Production Process

Glass In

Module Out

Page 18: Austin Ctea Expo

Polysilicon

Wafer Solar Cell Solar Panel SystemIngotPolysilicon

Value Chain Cost Distribution

Raw material, processing

Cell, assembly, framing

Labor, WiringMountingInverters

30%20%

50%

Typical US Solar System Cost Allocation by Category

Page 19: Austin Ctea Expo

Chinese Tier 1 Module ASPs, 2007 – 2010 ($/W)

Source: Barclays

Page 20: Austin Ctea Expo
Page 21: Austin Ctea Expo

23

Module Manufacturers’ Shipment Trends

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1Q09A 2Q09A 3Q09A 4Q09A 1Q10E 2Q10E 3Q10E 4Q10E

Chinese Total

US Total Modules

Barclays Capital Research

Page 22: Austin Ctea Expo

• Only Sharp was in the top 5 just 3 years ago

Page 23: Austin Ctea Expo

THE NEXT 5 YEARS…

Page 24: Austin Ctea Expo

Trend to watch - Outsourcing

• iSuppli predicts over 1GW of modules will be produced by contract manufacturers

• Flextronics recently announced a number of major deals:– Q Cells – 200MW contract for production in Malaysia

– SunPower – 75MW contract for production in Milpitas

– Enphase – additional manufacturing contract added to existing relationship to build micro-inverters in Canada

• For mature technology:– Can reduce cost and CapEx

– Meets local manufacturing content guidelines • required for Ontario feed-in-tariff

Page 25: Austin Ctea Expo

Current Module ASP Forecast to 2012

Source: Greentech/ Prometheus

Page 26: Austin Ctea Expo

When one constraint goes away, equilibrium can radically shift

28

Source: Greentech Media

Page 27: Austin Ctea Expo

Today, large markets at grid parity

• NREL study looked at 1000 cities nationwide

• Meaningful population centers at or near grid parity

Page 28: Austin Ctea Expo

2015 with 0.5% annual rate hike

• Includes:– ITC only

– Falling system prices

• Almost half of market below grid parity

• 98% within 5 cents/ kWh

Page 29: Austin Ctea Expo

2015 with 1% annual rate hike

Includes:ITC only

Falling system prices

Two-thirds of market below grid parity

99% within 5 cents/ kWh

Page 30: Austin Ctea Expo

THANK YOU!

IGA HALLBERG512-767-6030

[email protected]

Page 31: Austin Ctea Expo

World’s Highest Performance, Lowest Cost, & Most Versatile

Solar Power Platform