ATTACKING APPOINTMENT OF CROOKED U.S. JUDGES

8/9/2019 ATTACKING APPOINTMENT OF CROOKED U.S. JUDGES

1/21

Search:

The Florida Bar News

Advertising Ra tes Classifieds Attorneys Exchange Archives Subscribe Journal

News HOME

August 15, 2010

Magistrates Wilson, Pizzo, Chappell, and

Richardson seek reappointmentThe current term of office of U.S. Magistrate Judges Thomas G. Wilson, Mark A. Pizzo, Sheri P.

Chappell, and Monte C. Richardson are due to expire shortly, and each are seeking reappointment

to new eight-year terms.

Judge Wilson is located in Tampa, and his term is due to expire April 8, 2011. Judge Pizzo is also

located in Tampa, and his term is set to expire May 21, 2011. Judge Chappell is located in Ft.Myers, and her term is set to expire April 20, 2011. Judge Richardson serves in Jacksonville, and his

term is due to expire June 1, 2011.

The United States district court is required by law to establish a panel of citizens to consider

reappointment of the magistrate judge to a new term.

Comments from members of the Bar and public are invited, as to whether these incumbent

magistrate judges should be recommended by the panel for reappointment by the court, and should

be directed to Sheryl L. Loesch, Clerk of Court, United States District Court for the Middle District

of Florida, Attn: Magistrate Judge Reappointment Comments, 401 W. Central Blvd., Suite 2100,

Orlando 32801-0210. These comments must be received no later than September 8.

News HOME

[Revised: 08-26-2010 ]

2005 The Florida Bar

8/26/2010 Magistrates Wilson, Pizzo, Chappell, a

floridabar.org//a9e0384bac92d6828


2/21


3/21


4/21

PUBLIC NOTICE OF JUDICIAL CORRUPTION & CRIMES

DEFENDANT CROOKED U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE THOMAS G. WILSON

ATTN:MAGISTRATE JUDGE REAPPOINTMENT COMMENTS

401 W. Central Blvd., Suite 2100Orlando, FL 32801-0210

OBJECTIONS TO FACIALLY FRAUDULENT report and recommendation, DOC. # 67

1. The Plaintiff Government corruption & crime victims object to Defendant Crooked

Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilsons premeditated

a. Cover-up of Government Officials crimes and corruption on the public record;b. Fraudulent concealment of, e.g., Def. Officials extortion, fraud, obstruction of justice;

c. Extension of Government corruption, fraud, retaliation, and deliberate deprivations;

d. Extortion of Plaintiffs Lot 15A, Cayo Costa, and money underfraudulent pretenses.See Doc. # 67, mailed on 08/19/2010.

PLAINTIFFS CONTEST MAGISTRATE WILSONS CORRUPTION, DOC. # 67

2. The Plaintiff unimpeachable record owners of and title holders to Lot 15A contestDefendant Magistrate Thomas G. Wilsons publicly recorded and proven:

a. Corruption;

b. Fraud, deception, and trickery;c. Fraud on the Court;

d. Dishonesty;

e. Objective partiality;f. Incompetence;

g. Perversion of the law and public record evidence.

PLAINTIFF ATTACK DEF. WILSONS FALSIFIED factual findings, DOC. # 673. The Plaintiffs hereby attackDefendant T. G. Wilsons

a. Perversion of publicly recorded title evidence;

b. Perversion ofprima facie scam O.R. 569/875 into an instrument oftrickery;c. Perversion and falsification of real property tax payment evidence;

d. Alteration of official records and documents forcriminal purposes ofracketeering.

DEF. CROOKED JUDGE WILSON CONSPIRED TO CONCEAL FAKE land parcels

4. In particular, Defendant Wilson conspired with other Officials and Defendants to conceal,e.g.:

a. Fake land parcel 12-44-20-01-00000.00A0;b. Fake land parcel 07-44-21-01-00001.0000;c. Fake judgment;d. Fake July 29, 2009, judgment;e. Fakeun-recorded $5,048.60 judgment, Doc. ## 386, 432;f. Fake lien;g. Fake writ of execution, Doc. # 425;h. Fake resolution 569/875, O.R. 569/875, Lee County Public Records, Doc. # 338;


5/21

2

i. Non-existence offictitious 08/22/2008 Rule 38 Motion, Doc. # 386.See Case 2:2007-cv-00228; see Lee County Plat Book 3, Page 25 (1912) on file.

DEF. WILSON CONCEALED LACK OF RECORD OF FALSIFIED land parcels

5. Def. Wilson knew that he or any intelligent,fit, and honestperson in Wilsons shoes could

a. NOTfindfacially forged land parcel 12-44-20-01-00000.00A0;\b. NOTfindfacially forged land parcel 07-44-21-01-00001.0000;c. NOTfindany Lee County title to forged land parcel 12-44-20-01-00000.00A0;d. NOTfindany Lee County title to forged land parcel 07-44-21-01-00001.0000;

DEF. CROOKED JUDGE WILSON PERVERTED THE 1912 PLAT, PB 3, PG 25

6. Plain and short, the attached 1912 Cayo Costa Subdivision Plat of Surveya. Was devoid offalsified land parcel 12-44-20-01-00000.00A0; b. Wasdevoid offalsified land parcel 07-44-21-01-00001.0000;c. Was devoid of the falsified Lee County park.Here, Def. Wilson knew that as a matter of law the fraudulently pretendedconveyance of

said fake land parcels in reference to said 1912 Plat had been legally and factuallyimpossible.

WILSON CONSPIRED TO CONCEAL ORGANIZED JUDICIAL CRIME, DOC. # 67

7. Florida law prohibitsfraudulent fabrication of a fakeinterestin fictitious land parcels.Here, Plaintiff(s) had demandedjudicial notice of, e.g.:a. Ch. 95, Florida Statutes,ADVERSE POSSESSION; b. Ch.73, 74, Florida Statutes,EMINENT DOMAIN;c. Ch. 712, F.S., self-enforcingFLORIDAMARKETABLE RECORD TITLE ACT;d. Article I, s. 10, Florida Constitution;

e. Article I, s. 2, Florida Constitution;f. Article I, s. 9, Florida Constitution;

g. The recorded fraudulent violations of Florida Statutes and Constitution;

h. Def. K. M. Wilkinsons publicly recorded fabrications and fraud on the Court.

DEF. CROOK WILSON CONCEALED DELIBERATE DEPRIVATIONS,

FLORIDA CONSTITUTION, 1st, 14

th, 7

th, 4

th, 5

thU.S. CONST. AMEND.

8. Article I, s. 9, Fla. Const., states that"[n]o person shall be deprived of . . . property without due process of law . . . ."

Art. I, s. 2, Fla. Const. states that

"[a]ll natural persons are equal before the law . . . ."

Art. I, s. 10, Fla. Const., states that

"No . . . law impairing the obligation of contracts shall be passed ."

Here, the Plaintiffs had the fundamental equal rights to own their Lot 15A, Cayo Costa,and exclude Defendant Governments from their riparian Gulf-front street and uplands, PB 3

PG 25, U.S. Constitutional Amendments. The Plaintiff record real property tax payers, Lot

15A, and title holders were entitled to defend theirperfected unencumbered marketable

record title against Defendant Officials racketeering, extortion, retaliation, deliberate

deprivations, and obstruction of justice underfraudulent pretenses and color of office.


6/21

3

EXTENSION OF RECORD EXTORTION, FRAUD, DELIBERATE DEPRIVATIONS

9. Defendants facially frivolous allegations of said sham land parcels werea. Legally incomprehensible;

b. NOT any valid defense orgenuineclaim;c. Forcriminalpurposes of, e.g., racketeering, retaliation, extortion, and fraud;

d. Controverted by the Lee County Real Property Grantor/Grantee Index.e. Prohibited under

DEF. WILSONS IDIOTIC, ARBITRARY, AND CAPRICIOUS report, DOC. # 67

10. Like a bungling Government idiot, Def. Wilson rambled incomprehensibly:

The property may have been taken over by Lee County in some way. Id., p.

Florida law does not recognize take over by Government.11. Any involuntary alienation of property in Florida is strictly and necessarily a judicial

function and must follow due judicial process, Chapters 73, 74, 95, Fla. Stat. Here, nojudgehad everorderedany title transfer, Lot 15A, against the Plaintiffs will. Here, no eminentdomain oradverse possession judgmentordocumenthad everexisted.

AMBIGUOUS AND VAGUE JUDICIAL TRASH, DOC. # 67, P. 2:

GUESSING GOVERNMENT CROOK THOMAS G. WILSON

12. On the public record, Doc. # 67, Defendant Wilson asserted his guessing game and judicialcharade:

I guess something was appealed Id., p. 2.

PLAYING DUMB & DUMBER: DEFENDANT IDIOT THOMAS G. WILSON

Upon reading of the complaint, I have no concrete idea what happened. Id., p. 3.

Other defendants had something to do with the record of title to the property. Id., p. 2.

Here is all that I could get out of it. Id.

Here, Government idiot Wilson played so dumb that he confused, e.g.:

a. Causes of action; b. Claims for relief;

c. Parties;

d. Actions.

13. Here, the Plaintiffrecord owners and holders ofindisputable Warranty Deed, Lot 15A, can

only live in furtherfear ofinjury from, e.g., said publicly recorded judiciala. Corruption;

b. Idiocy;

c. Ignorance;

d. Irrationality;e. Recklessness.


7/21

4

FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT OF U.S.A. Ex Rel. et al. v. U.S.A. et al.

14. In their independent action for relief from, e.g., extrinsic fraud, fraud on the Court,racketeering, retaliation, extortion, obstruction of justice, the Plaintiff record owners of Lot

15A attacked the prima facie nullity, illegality, and criminality of judicial determinations

regarding the record ownership of private land fraudulently claimed as public land under

facially false and deceptive pretenses of fake law and/or resolution, scam O.R.569/875. See U.S.A. Ex Rel. et al. v. U.S.A. et al., 1:10-cv-321-JL, U.S. District Court,District of New Hampshire.

15. Here, Def. Wilson concealed the most elementary legal principle that any involuntaryalienation could not havepossibly been a legislative function, and that the fraudulent land-transfer-by-resolution-scam was a hoax and extortion scheme

DEF. WILSON CONSPIRED TO CONCEAL FAKED frivolous appeal motion:

WILSON KNEW THAT WILKINSON ADMITTEDLY DID NOTfile Rule 38 motion

16. Here admittedly, Defendant Kenneth M. Wilkinson, Crooked Lee County PropertyAppraiser, had filed a Motion for Sanctions pursuant to Eleventh Circuit Rule 27-4.

Here, Defendant Crooked Magistrate Wilson knew, fraudulently concealed, and conspiredwith other Government Agents to conceal that Def. Wilkinson did notfile a Rule 38 orfrivolous appeal motion:

DEFENDANT WILKINSON FILED RULE 27-4motion [frivolous motion], DOC. # 386

See Doc. # 386, 11/30/2009, p. 2, Case 2:2007-cv-00228.

DEFENDANTS CONSPIRED TO grant FAKE rule 38 motion

17. In the record absence of a rule 38 motion, the Defendant U.S. Appellate Court Judges,11

thCircuit, conspired with other Defendant Officials to fake and grant a non-existent

rule 38 motion, which they knew Defendant Wilkinson had admittedlynotfiled.

See Doc. # 386-4, 11/30/2009, p. 1 of 2, Case 2:2007-cv-00228.


8/21


9/21


10/21


11/21


12/21

Case 2:10-cv-00089-CEH-TGW Document 67 Filed 08/18/10 Page 1 of 10


13/21


14/21



15/21



16/21



17/21



18/21



19/21



20/21



21/21


ATTACKING APPOINTMENT OF CROOKED U.S. JUDGES

Documents

Transcript of ATTACKING APPOINTMENT OF CROOKED U.S. JUDGES