Attachment S Fl150e Hed 0116582009

11

Click here to load reader

Transcript of Attachment S Fl150e Hed 0116582009

Page 1: Attachment S Fl150e Hed 0116582009

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ROMMEL vs. DANIELSON Case No: HED 011658

9. CHANGE OF INCOME

The respondents income has significantly decrease based

from the results of the opposing parties discovering the

respondents employment opportunities, personal relationships

in order to continue there objective in violation

18 U.S.C. § 1589: (Forced labor)

Obtaining labor or services by (1) threats of serious harm to, or

physical restraint against victim or another person; (2) scheme, plan,

etc. causing victim to believe she’d suffer serious harm or physical

restraint if labor/services not performed; (3) abuse or threatened

abuse of law or the legal process.

There is a reasonable indication, based on the

statements the respondent encountered on Oct 30 and November

5, the respondents former employer Competrol was subject to

engaged in the illegal activity due to the following

conversations and questions made at Competrol in reference to

the respondent.

October 31

Approx. 6:42a.m.

The respondent was on his way to a job site in Helendale next

to TXI Riverside Cement Oro Grande and receives a phone by his

boss Rob Iorio and was in a panic of fear state. Rob said

something happened at home and he was turning back around, I

asked him if everything was okay, Rob replied I don’t know

some thing happen to his wife or daughter, and I was to

contact his clients/appointments and reschedule them due to

MD.NOV09 _____________________________________ATTACHMENT FL - 150 INCOME EXPENSE DECLARATION

Page 2: Attachment S Fl150e Hed 0116582009

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ROMMEL vs. DANIELSON Case No: HED 011658

being ill, tell his partner Gary Alexander he wasn’t able to

make it, and his phone will be off.

November 5

Respondent arrived at work to learn there was a change of

plans due to Rob and Gary stating it wasn’t safe for the

respondent to be in Helendale due to the dispute between TXI

Riverside Cement and the respondent

HR Leah Burno of Competrol- November 5,

8:35 a.m. Leah Burno H.R / Phone...P

“Yeah that’s going to be a hell of a wake up call haha...He’s

not even headed in that direction...Did he ask you the right

question.” Hangs up

8:42a.m. Respondent MDD / Leah Burno

“Do you know what happen with Rob, Friday he called on my way

up to Silver Lakes Market”. (helendale)#

Leah / Respondent MDD

“he had family problems, it had nothing to do with you”.

Respondent MDD / Leah Burno“when he called me he sounded like he was in fear, crying and

said he had to turn around something happen at home and he ask

me to contact his clients that he is ill and to tell gary he

was’t able to make it. On Monday I asked Rob what happen and

he replied OH DON’T EVEN GO THERE, I asked Rob it didn’t have

any thing to do with me did it cause I told him why I didn’t

want to do this job site”

MD.NOV09 _____________________________________ATTACHMENT FL - 150 INCOME EXPENSE DECLARATION

Page 3: Attachment S Fl150e Hed 0116582009

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ROMMEL vs. DANIELSON Case No: HED 011658

8:44a.m. Leah Burno / Respondent MDD

“It’s funny that he would call you not Gary or I”

(Mike reveals some evidence to her as she comments “how did you get that”)

8:52a.m. Leah Burno / Phone...

“He has bigger problems to deal with”...

8:53a.m Leah Burno / Phone...

“Hey as long as the check cashes right haha”...

8:55a.m. Leah Burno / Phone...

“He won’t be back for a while”.

8:56a.m. Leah Burno / Phone...

“Well you know if any thing is ever brought up, we can always

just say that he quit here”...

8:58a.m. Leah Burno / Phone...

“There is so much drama here I cant even tell ya”...

9:08a.m Leah Burno / Phone...

Dialed...“Hi, he’s gone for good (Laughs) bye”. (hangs up)

9:20a.m. Leah Burno / Phone...

“he’s not even 100% for Obama... you know he realizes this is

all a political machine...he would’t go work for him he would

like campaign for him...If Michael was that passionate about

MD.NOV09 _____________________________________ATTACHMENT FL - 150 INCOME EXPENSE DECLARATION

Page 4: Attachment S Fl150e Hed 0116582009

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ROMMEL vs. DANIELSON Case No: HED 011658

some thing he would be out there doing something about it...So

what does he do just deal with it...Were Done, Were Done, Were

Done...haha”...

9:29a.m Leah Burno / Phone...

“here are people who said that...I.m not making excuses for

him...It’s not that black and white”...

9:__a.m. Leah Burno / Phone...

Well I’ll probably be dead anyways I want to stay around as

long as I can”...So you consider your friends inheriting

evil ...Wow I’m glad I’m not you...Why am I taking the cop out

Rich.

___a.m. Leah Burno / Visitor

Other Cases Case No: VVCV 042021 TXI v. Danielson Case No: FVI024979 TXI v. Danielson

Case No: MVI049835 D.A. Case No: 2006-00-0029718- Ramos, TXI v. Danielson

Case No: FVA027339 TXI v. Danielson

Case No: MVI049833 D.A. Case No: 2006-00-0040766 – Ramos, TXI v. Danielson

Case No: 08-O-14773 Danielson v. Miller

MD.NOV09 _____________________________________ATTACHMENT FL - 150 INCOME EXPENSE DECLARATION

Page 5: Attachment S Fl150e Hed 0116582009

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ROMMEL vs. DANIELSON Case No: HED 011658

Case No: RIC 530059 Danielson v. Riverside Cement

Case No: ED-CV-09-1442 Danielson v. Riverside cement

Case No: 13067-VNRCI

Case No: 09-2680-OIP

Danielson vs. TXI Operations LP San Bernardino County Assessor//Recorders Office

San Bernardino District Attorney Michael A Ramos Offic

15. Attorney Fees:

DANIELSON, MIKEL BILLING SUMMARY

DATE DESCRIPTION RATE HOURS TOTAL4/12/2007 INTAKE FILE SB 250 1.8 4504/20/2007 OSC:VISITATION,

SPOUSAL SUPPORT SB 250 4.4 1100

MD.NOV09 _____________________________________ATTACHMENT FL - 150 INCOME EXPENSE DECLARATION

Page 6: Attachment S Fl150e Hed 0116582009

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ROMMEL vs. DANIELSON Case No: HED 011658

ATTY FEES5/30/2007 REVIEW

RESPONSIVE DECFILED BY OC

SB 250 0.3 75

7/25/2007 HEARING RE:OC JD 250 2.5 6259/20/2007 APPEARANCE DM 300 0.2 602/4/2008 STIP TO

CONTINUE MSC SB 250 0.2

50

VARIOUS TC TO OC SB 250 2.2 550VARIOUS TC TO FROM

CLIENT SB 250 1.9 475

FILING FEESRUNNER, DELIVERY

45

160

TOTAL 4735

3/29/2007 PAYMENT -9004/30/2007 PAYMENT -6005/07/2007 PAYMENT -3009/14/2007 PAYMENT -10009/17/2007 PAYMENT -500

BALANCE DUE: 1435

4. Other Parties Income:

See Exhibit A Pages DOCUMENTS MLS ON FILE- Note: NO QUICKCLAIM MLS

See Exhibit B ___ Pages DOCUMENTS HANDED TO RESPONDENT

CLOSING STATEMENTS-HUD 1 TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP-###

MD.NOV09 _____________________________________ATTACHMENT FL - 150 INCOME EXPENSE DECLARATION

Page 7: Attachment S Fl150e Hed 0116582009

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ROMMEL vs. DANIELSON Case No: HED 011658

I MIKEL DEE DANIELSON DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER

THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE ABOVE IS TRUE AND

CORRECT.

DATED: NOVEMBER 17 2009

MD.NOV09 _____________________________________ATTACHMENT FL - 150 INCOME EXPENSE DECLARATION

Page 8: Attachment S Fl150e Hed 0116582009

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ROMMEL vs. DANIELSON Case No: HED 011658

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED

________________________

MIKEL DEE DANIELSON

MD.NOV09 _____________________________________ATTACHMENT FL - 150 INCOME EXPENSE DECLARATION

Page 9: Attachment S Fl150e Hed 0116582009

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ROMMEL vs. DANIELSON Case No: HED 011658

EXHIBIT A

MD.NOV09 _____________________________________ATTACHMENT FL - 150 INCOME EXPENSE DECLARATION

Page 10: Attachment S Fl150e Hed 0116582009

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ROMMEL vs. DANIELSON Case No: HED 011658

EXHIBIT B

MD.NOV09 _____________________________________ATTACHMENT FL - 150 INCOME EXPENSE DECLARATION