Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy · Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy Linda D. Gillam, MD,...

48
10/2/2017 1 Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy Linda D. Gillam, MD, MPH, FASE Chair, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Medical Director, Cardiovascular Service Line Former Team Cardiologist to the New York Jets No disclosures

Transcript of Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy · Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy Linda D. Gillam, MD,...

Page 1: Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy · Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy Linda D. Gillam, MD, MPH, FASE Chair, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Medical Director, Cardiovascular

10/2/2017

1

Athlete’s Heart vs. CardiomyopathyLinda D. Gillam, MD, MPH, FASE

Chair, Department of Cardiovascular MedicineMedical Director, Cardiovascular Service Line

Former Team Cardiologist to the New York Jets

No disclosures

Page 2: Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy · Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy Linda D. Gillam, MD, MPH, FASE Chair, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Medical Director, Cardiovascular

10/2/2017

2

Sports Cardiology at Morristown

Mat Martinez, MD, FACCDirector of Sports Cardiology

Official Cardiologist to the New York Jets

Questions asked of Echo

• Is increased wall thickness physiologic or pathologic?

• Are increased dimensions physiologic or pathologic?

• Is “reduced” function physiologic or pathologic?

Page 3: Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy · Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy Linda D. Gillam, MD, MPH, FASE Chair, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Medical Director, Cardiovascular

10/2/2017

3

Is this normal or abnormal?

• Can this patient play sports (make a living, take a scholarship)?

• Does this patient need a defibrillator?

• Are there genetic/family implications to my decision?

• What is the prognosis?

Page 4: Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy · Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy Linda D. Gillam, MD, MPH, FASE Chair, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Medical Director, Cardiovascular

10/2/2017

4

CAUSE OF SCA IN YOUNG ATHLETES(N=387, BASED ON AUTOPSY REPORTS

Causes of SCD

• Structural

• Electrical

• Other– Commotio cordis

– Myocarditis, dcm

Page 5: Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy · Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy Linda D. Gillam, MD, MPH, FASE Chair, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Medical Director, Cardiovascular

10/2/2017

5

Corrado: J Am CollCard 2003

Thanks to Mat Martinez, MD

Page 6: Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy · Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy Linda D. Gillam, MD, MPH, FASE Chair, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Medical Director, Cardiovascular

10/2/2017

6

Thanks to Mat Martinez, MD

The Changing Face of the American Athlete - Collegiate

Thanks to Mat Martinez, MD

Page 7: Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy · Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy Linda D. Gillam, MD, MPH, FASE Chair, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Medical Director, Cardiovascular

10/2/2017

7

The Changing Face of the American Athlete - Masters

Atletes Come in All Shapes and Sizes

Page 8: Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy · Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy Linda D. Gillam, MD, MPH, FASE Chair, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Medical Director, Cardiovascular

10/2/2017

8

Pay attention to age,gender,race, body size and sport specific norms!

Reminder

Non-myopathicconditions affect athletes too

– CAD

– HTN

– BAV etc

Page 9: Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy · Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy Linda D. Gillam, MD, MPH, FASE Chair, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Medical Director, Cardiovascular

10/2/2017

9

Page 10: Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy · Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy Linda D. Gillam, MD, MPH, FASE Chair, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Medical Director, Cardiovascular

10/2/2017

10

Exercise Physiology Basics

• Exercise requires oxygen

• Increased pulmonary oxygen uptake

• Increased cardiac output

• Increased peripheral oxygen extraction

Page 11: Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy · Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy Linda D. Gillam, MD, MPH, FASE Chair, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Medical Director, Cardiovascular

10/2/2017

11

Exercise Physiology Basics

• Exercise requires oxygen

• Increased pulmonary oxygen uptake

• Increased cardiac output

• Increased peripheral oxygen extraction

Cardiac Output = HR X Stroke Volume

Stroke volume = End-diastolic volume minus End-systolic

volume*

* In the absence of valve regurgitation or intracardiac shunts

Page 12: Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy · Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy Linda D. Gillam, MD, MPH, FASE Chair, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Medical Director, Cardiovascular

10/2/2017

12

• Cardiac output may increase 5-6 X with HR responsible for the majority of the change

• Max HR does not increase with exercise training (age-related)

• Stroke volume does increase with exercise training (resting and peak exercise)– SV increases because EDV ± ESV

2 Forms of Exercise Training(some overlap)

• Isotonic– Sustained increase in CO with normal or

reduced SVR

• Isometric– Increased SVR and normal or slightly

increased CO

Page 13: Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy · Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy Linda D. Gillam, MD, MPH, FASE Chair, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Medical Director, Cardiovascular

10/2/2017

13

Athlete’s Heart

• Well recognized that repetitive physical exercise causes adaptive changes in cardiac structure and function

“Athlete’s Heart”

• Although historically some dispute as to whether changes were harmful, consensus is that this is a favorable adaptive response rather than pre-clinical disease

Athlete’s Heart

• Anatomic changes

• Functional changes

Page 14: Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy · Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy Linda D. Gillam, MD, MPH, FASE Chair, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Medical Director, Cardiovascular

10/2/2017

14

Left Ventricular Response

• Increased cavity size• Increased wall thickness

– Generally associated with increased cavity size

– More pronounced in those who are large and Afro-Caribbean

• Morganroth hypothesis– Isotonic -> dilatation (eccentric LVH)– Isometric -> increased wall thickness

(concentric LVH)

Page 15: Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy · Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy Linda D. Gillam, MD, MPH, FASE Chair, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Medical Director, Cardiovascular

10/2/2017

15

Similar Changes with RV

JASE 2017 Volume 30, Issue 9, Pages 845–858

Page 16: Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy · Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy Linda D. Gillam, MD, MPH, FASE Chair, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Medical Director, Cardiovascular

10/2/2017

16

Wall thickness

Distribution of Maximal Left-Ventricular-Wall Thicknesses in the 947 Elite Athletes.

Pelliccia A et al. N Engl J Med 1991;324:295-301.

1.7% ≥ 1.3 cm

Pelliccia A et al. N Engl J Med 1991;324:295-301

Page 17: Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy · Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy Linda D. Gillam, MD, MPH, FASE Chair, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Medical Director, Cardiovascular

10/2/2017

17

Gender Matters

Maron Circulation 2006 citing Pelliccia et al Ann Intern Med. 1999;130(1):23-31.

Race Matters

Page 18: Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy · Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy Linda D. Gillam, MD, MPH, FASE Chair, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Medical Director, Cardiovascular

10/2/2017

18

Effect of specific sports training on LV cavity dimension or wall thickness in elite athletes, representing 27 different sporting disciplines.

Barry J. Maron, and Antonio Pelliccia Circulation. 2006;114:1633-1644

NFL 2011-2013

~ 10% ≥ 1.3 cm.

NFL data Courtesy of Dr Kovacs ACC 2013

Page 19: Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy · Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy Linda D. Gillam, MD, MPH, FASE Chair, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Medical Director, Cardiovascular

10/2/2017

19

From: Athletic Cardiac Remodeling in US Professional Basketball Players: Engel et al

JAMA Cardiol. 2016;1(1):80-87.

~10% ≥ 1.3 cm.

Impact of Gender and Race

• Less remodeling in women (even with correcting smaller baseline heart sizes)

• More remodeling in blacks – LV wall thickness >12mm in 20% black

men vs 4 % whites

• Black women have thicker walls than white women

Page 20: Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy · Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy Linda D. Gillam, MD, MPH, FASE Chair, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Medical Director, Cardiovascular

10/2/2017

20

Chamber dimensions

Pelliccia. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130(1):23-31.1309 elite athletes, all with EF >50%

LVEDD

Page 21: Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy · Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy Linda D. Gillam, MD, MPH, FASE Chair, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Medical Director, Cardiovascular

10/2/2017

21

Abergel. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44149

LVIDd >60m (51%)

Pro Cyclists LV chamber size

LV chamber size in the NBAFrom: Athletic Cardiac Remodeling in US Professional Basketball Players: Engel et alJAMA Cardiol. 2016;1(1):80-87.

All but 5 with normal EF > 50%

36%

Page 22: Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy · Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy Linda D. Gillam, MD, MPH, FASE Chair, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Medical Director, Cardiovascular

10/2/2017

22

Gherardo Finocchiaro et al. JIMG 2017;10:965-972

Page 23: Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy · Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy Linda D. Gillam, MD, MPH, FASE Chair, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Medical Director, Cardiovascular

10/2/2017

23

Gherardo Finocchiaro et al. JIMG 2017;10:965-972

Gherardo Finocchiaro et al. JIMG 2017;10:965-972

Page 24: Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy · Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy Linda D. Gillam, MD, MPH, FASE Chair, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Medical Director, Cardiovascular

10/2/2017

24

Average training impulse (TRIMP) scores per month for all subjects over the training year.

Armin Arbab-Zadeh et al. Circulation. 2014;130:2152-2161

Page 25: Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy · Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy Linda D. Gillam, MD, MPH, FASE Chair, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Medical Director, Cardiovascular

10/2/2017

25

Changes in left ventricular (LV) mass (left) and right ventricular (RV) mass (right) measured by magnetic resonance imaging every 3 months during the 1-year training program.

Armin Arbab-Zadeh et al. Circulation. 2014;130:2152-2161

Mean±SD changes in left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV; left) and right ventricular end-diastolic volume (RVEDV; middle) by magnetic resonance imaging measured every 3

months during the training program.

Armin Arbab-Zadeh et al. Circulation. 2014;130:2152-2161

Page 26: Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy · Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy Linda D. Gillam, MD, MPH, FASE Chair, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Medical Director, Cardiovascular

10/2/2017

26

Systolic Function

LVEF/Systolic function

• Typically normal

• But may be borderline or mildly reduced (50-55%) leading to concern about dilated cardiomyopathy

• Role for stress echocardiography in establishing contractile reserve

• Strain also helpful

Page 27: Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy · Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy Linda D. Gillam, MD, MPH, FASE Chair, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Medical Director, Cardiovascular

10/2/2017

27

Echocardiographic tissue Doppler imaging (A and C) and speckle-tracking radial strain analysis (B and D) in 2 different athletic patients presenting with left ventricular hypertrophy.

Baggish A L , Wood M J Circulation 2011;123:2723-2735

Atria

Page 28: Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy · Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy Linda D. Gillam, MD, MPH, FASE Chair, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Medical Director, Cardiovascular

10/2/2017

28

Left atrium

• In Italian series >20% had enlarged left atria (as measured by AP diameter)– No volume data

• Questionable association with supraventricular arrhythmias

Page 29: Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy · Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy Linda D. Gillam, MD, MPH, FASE Chair, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Medical Director, Cardiovascular

10/2/2017

29

Pelliccia. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130(1):23-31.

LA AP diameter

From Galderisi et al EACVI Recommendations

LA volumes

Page 30: Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy · Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy Linda D. Gillam, MD, MPH, FASE Chair, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Medical Director, Cardiovascular

10/2/2017

30

Diastolic Function:Myopathy or Athlete’s Heart?

Diastolic Function

• Isotonic training– Enhanced relaxation

• Isometric training– Impaired or unchanged relaxation (less

well studied)

Page 31: Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy · Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy Linda D. Gillam, MD, MPH, FASE Chair, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Medical Director, Cardiovascular

10/2/2017

31

• In athlete’s heart diastolic function is normal or super-normal

• In HCM, diastolic function is variably abnormal

Diastolic Function in the Athlete

• Increased early diastolic filling– E/A ratio > 1

• normal deceleration time – 100 -200 ms

• normal isovolumetric relaxation time – <100 ms.

Page 32: Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy · Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy Linda D. Gillam, MD, MPH, FASE Chair, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Medical Director, Cardiovascular

10/2/2017

32

Galderisi et al European Heart Journal – Cardiovascular Imaging (2015) 16, 353

Diastolic Function in HCM• Decreased early diastolic filling

– E/A ratio <0.5

• Lengthened deceleration time

– >280 ms

• Ar-Ad > 30 ms

• Decreased annular e’

Page 33: Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy · Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy Linda D. Gillam, MD, MPH, FASE Chair, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Medical Director, Cardiovascular

10/2/2017

33

Wall thickness = 1.2 cm

Decel time = 187 ms

Page 34: Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy · Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy Linda D. Gillam, MD, MPH, FASE Chair, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Medical Director, Cardiovascular

10/2/2017

34

Page 35: Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy · Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy Linda D. Gillam, MD, MPH, FASE Chair, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Medical Director, Cardiovascular

10/2/2017

35

Athlete’s Heart

IVS = 1.4, PW = 1.2

Page 36: Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy · Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy Linda D. Gillam, MD, MPH, FASE Chair, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Medical Director, Cardiovascular

10/2/2017

36

Page 37: Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy · Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy Linda D. Gillam, MD, MPH, FASE Chair, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Medical Director, Cardiovascular

10/2/2017

37

Hypertrophic CM

Page 38: Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy · Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy Linda D. Gillam, MD, MPH, FASE Chair, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Medical Director, Cardiovascular

10/2/2017

38

When left atrial pressure is elevated

Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography 2011 24, 473-498DOI:

Diastolic abnormalities may be present prior to hypertrophy

Page 39: Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy · Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy Linda D. Gillam, MD, MPH, FASE Chair, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Medical Director, Cardiovascular

10/2/2017

39

Individual data points showing septal and lateral Sa and Ea velocities at baseline and follow-up in both groups: the 12 subjects who had inherited the causal mutations for HCM and the 12

individuals in the control group.

Sherif F. Nagueh et al. Circulation. 2003;108:395-398

Page 40: Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy · Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy Linda D. Gillam, MD, MPH, FASE Chair, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Medical Director, Cardiovascular

10/2/2017

40

Aorta

• Pathologic enlargement typically not encountered (>4 cm)

• Inconsistent data on impact of training on aortic root size

From: Athletic Cardiac Remodeling in US Professional Basketball PlayersEngel et al. JAMA Cardiol. 2016;1(1):80-87. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2015.0252

Page 41: Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy · Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy Linda D. Gillam, MD, MPH, FASE Chair, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Medical Director, Cardiovascular

10/2/2017

41

A word about complementary modalities

Page 42: Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy · Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy Linda D. Gillam, MD, MPH, FASE Chair, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Medical Director, Cardiovascular

10/2/2017

42

EKG

Athlete’s EKG

Increased chamber size

Left ventricular hypertrophyIncomplete RBBB

Left atrial enlargementRight atrial enlargement

VagotoniaSinus bradycardiaSinus arrhythmiaFirst degree AVB

ST-elevationTall T waves

Page 43: Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy · Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy Linda D. Gillam, MD, MPH, FASE Chair, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Medical Director, Cardiovascular

10/2/2017

43

MRI

• Assessment of LV/RV Mass, Dimensions

• Fibrosis

• Inflammation

• Pathognomonic findings in myopathies

Proposed Approach

Page 44: Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy · Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy Linda D. Gillam, MD, MPH, FASE Chair, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Medical Director, Cardiovascular

10/2/2017

44

Galderisi EACVI Recommendation

Galderisi EACVI Recommendation

Galderisi EACVI Recommendation

Page 45: Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy · Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy Linda D. Gillam, MD, MPH, FASE Chair, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Medical Director, Cardiovascular

10/2/2017

45

Sometimes even the experts are not sure

Deconditioning

Page 46: Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy · Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy Linda D. Gillam, MD, MPH, FASE Chair, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Medical Director, Cardiovascular

10/2/2017

46

Impact of extreme endurance activity

Page 47: Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy · Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy Linda D. Gillam, MD, MPH, FASE Chair, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Medical Director, Cardiovascular

10/2/2017

47

Figure 1. LV basal and apical circumferential and radial strains and LV longitudinal strains before (•) and after (○) the race.

Stéphane Nottin et al. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;2:323-330

Sports CardiologistSports Cardiologist

Sports Medicine TeamATC / Ex Phys

Sports Medicine TeamATC / Ex Phys

EPEP CV ImagingCV ImagingAthleteCardiac Assess-

ment

Page 48: Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy · Athlete’s Heart vs. Cardiomyopathy Linda D. Gillam, MD, MPH, FASE Chair, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Medical Director, Cardiovascular

10/2/2017

48

Take home messages

• Athlete’s heart may have altered anatomy and, to a lesser degree, function

• Published norms provide guidance but additional interventions (stress, deconditioning) may be essential

• Multimodality approach is essential– Advanced EKG interpretive skills

– MRI

• Meticulous echocardiography– Precise measurements

– Strain

– Stress echocardiography

• Specialized centers important