The global voice of ATM

ATFM – CANSO Global Role

Stuart Ratcliffe

Co – chair CANSO OSC ATFM WG

ICAO Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) Seminar (Dubai, UAE, 13-15 December 2016)

Agenda

• CANSO Activities o DOC 9971 Review Panel o APAC ATFM SG o CANSO ATFM WG

• CANSO Global Initiatives o APAC o Caribbean

• ATFM in the Middle East. o What Concept for Middle East o Multi-Nodal? o Benefits

• Keys for Successful ATFM/CDM Implementation • Conclusion

CANSO and ICAO

• ICAO ATM OPS Panel

DOC 9971 o Part of Review Panel o Contributed to rewrite

of Document

CANSO initiatives aligned with ICAO

APAC ATFM SG

• CANSO been member of SG meetings o ATFM SME

o Standard Terminology

o Capacity Enhancement

o Document writing and

review

CANSO contributing to ATFM implementation

CANSO ATFM WG

CANSO recognized that Regional ATFM implementation is needed OSC established CDMTF – renamed ATFM WG Objectives: • Best Practice Guide for CDM and ATFM implementation • Support development of common regional ATFM Framework • Support CANSO Regional Directors on ATFM in Regional

Implementation Groups

CANSO active in assisting with Regional ATFM implementation

CANSO Global ATFM Initiatives

• APAC

• Caribbean and Latin America

CANSO Global ATFM Initiative - APAC

CANSO Whole of flight CDM Pilot Project between BKK-SIN 2011-2012

Tripartite CDM Project between BKK-HKG-SIN 2012-2013

Multi Nodal Regional ATFM Concept 2014 - ….

Research Collaboration on Regional ATFM Concept 2013

ATFM Measure Effectiveness: Participation

• Demand Capacity Balancing requires sufficient participation of Aircraft

• 70% participation of flights is necessary to make an ATFM Measure fair and equitable

• Aircraft Participation o Domestic flights o International/Regional flights – flight duration up to approximately 4 hours o International flights – long haul flights

>70% participation ideal

APAC – A new ConOps 0%

100%

Domestic International

Singapore Changi

Jakarta Soekarno-Hatta

22.70%

77.30%

Bangkok Suvarnabhumi

Hong Kong International

33.30%

66.70%

Kuala Lumpur International

International vs. domestic flight mix identified a need for new ATFM ConOps

Multi- Nodal Cross Border Regional ATFM

• Domestic/Regional/International flights • No Central Management • Connected via virtual network • Each State responsible for ATFM within own

state • All participating states adhere to common

operational procedures • Could include Airborne flights • Aircraft Operators choose where to take

delay: – Gate – Surface – En-Route

Project Members Level 3 ATFM Nodes Generate, Distribute, Comply to CTOT

China Hong Kong China Singapore Thailand

Level 2 ATFM Nodes Receive and Comply to CTOT

Indonesia Malaysia Cambodia

Level 1 ATFM Nodes Observers

Philippines Viet Nam Lao PDR Myanmar

Advisor Australia

Status of the ConOps

Process of Implementation in APAC

• Distributed Ground Delay Program • Airport Arrival Constraints (short-term &

medium-term) e.g. weather, runway outage

Phase 1 2015 - 2016

• Ground Delay Program supporting Airspace Congestion & Capacity Planning

• Explore interconnectivity among ATFM systems Phase 2

• Fully interconnected Global ATFM Service • Integration with SWIM and 4D-Trajectory

Management

Phase X Vision

Phased Approach to the Operational Trial

CADENA CADENA = CANSO ATFM Data Exchange Network for the Americas

“Cadena” is also the Spanish for “chain”.

• 1st Meeting - CUBA August 2016

• 2nd Meeting - Argentina October 2016

CADENA Progress

• Progress thus far o Terms of reference, roles and responsibilities set o FAA has made SWIM Platform available for all participating

countries – Requirements for connection o Discussion on ATFM information to be shared o What is needed to connect to the SWIM platform o Organizational Structure of ATFMU being proposed o Letters of Agreement being set o Job descriptions of ATFM personnel o CDM Teleconference instruction o 6 practice ATFM Telecons

Significant progress in short space

of time

CDM Telecons • Objectives

o All stakeholders gain insight into ATM

conditions in region, pre-tactical and tactical

o Common interpretation of weather conditions

o Sharing constraints in FIRs and in region

o Explain any ATFM measures to be implemented

o Post Event Analysis

CADENA going forward • Review existing national plans for ATFM • Identify Key Stakeholders • Identify Resources

o Facilities o Equipment o Staffing

• Procedure Development o Internal and Regional o Documentation

• Education • Ensure implementation is harmonized within the region and

between regions. Participating ANSPs are committed

to harmonized Regional ATFM

ATFM/CDM in Middle East

• It is evident that ATFM/CDM is required in the region • Can ATFM models employed in other countries/regions be effective in

Middle East? o North America

o Central Authority o Domestic Flights only

o EUROCONTROL o Central Authority o Traffic within EUROCONTROL region

o Australia o Central Authority o Domestic Traffic only

o APAC o No Central Authority - All ANSPs responsible for ATFM in their own area of responsibility o Domestic/Regional/International o All connected via a Virtual CDM Platform

What ConOps is applicable?

ATFM Middle East

Similar Situation to APAC • Significant growth • Demand exceeding Capacity • Not enough domestic flights to

make up 70% participation • Domestic Solution not feasible • Centralized ATFMU? • High percentage of Regional and

International flights

Middle East Cross Border Multi-Nodal ATFM?

CDM VIRTUAL

ATFM

BAHRAIN ATFMU

SAUDI ARABIA ATFMU

KUWAIT ATFMU

QATAR ATFMU

EUROCONTROL

UAE ATFMU

RIYADH

JEDDAH

DUBAI

ABU DHABI

SZC

OMAN ATFMU

MUSCAT Fujairah

Regional Qualitative Benefits

• Networked approach • Enhanced situational awareness

between ANSPs • More effective planning in all

phases of ATFM will take place • Airports with minimal domestic

traffic will be able to do DCB • ATFM measures will be fair and

equitable • Network planning during special

event planning

Operational Benefits - Quantitative

• Benefits Analysis was performed using Operational Scenarios and actual data for OMDB

• Simulation ATFM System was used to perform analysis by simulating GDPs

Operational Benefits - Quantitative Conservative approach adopted shows significant annual savings available for implementing ATFM

Keys for Successful Regional ATFM/CDM

• Support from Executive Management • ANSPs need to work together for Regional implementation • Engagement with stakeholders to drive cultural change • Trust among stakeholders through transparent processes • Core requirements for Demand Capacity Balancing

o Data availability for network-wide demand projection

• Flexibility to adapt the plan o Capacity can change, the plan must be able to change with it o Aircraft operators can modify flight priorities and schedules

• Continuous improvement through performance assessment o Post event operational analysis

ATFM Implementation requires common purpose and commitment from all stakeholders

Global ATFM/CDM

A U S T R A L I A

C O L OMBIA

PE R U

BOLIVIA

CHILE

C A N A D A

MEXI C O

BELIZE

HONDURAS

NI C AR A G U A

G U A TEMA L A

C O S T A RI C A

P A N AMA

SURI N AME

P AR A G U A Y

(DENMARK)

U N I T E D S T A T E S

B R A Z I L

GU Y A N A

EC U ADOR

U . S.

A R GENTI N A

VENEZUE L A

G r eenland

F r ench Guiana

QUEEN ELIZABETH ISLANDS

Island of Newfoundland

EL S A L V ADOR

CU B A

B AHAMAS THE

REPUBLIC

DOMINI C AN

J AMAI C A HAITI

PUERTO RICO

U R UG U A Y

ICE L AND N O R W A Y

SWEDEN

FINLAND

FRA N CE

S P AIN

I T A L Y

TUNISIA

MO R OC C O

UNITED KI N GDOM

L IRELAND

R OMANIA

A L G E R I A L I B Y A

E G Y P T

DENMARK

GERMANY

GREECE

PO R TU G AL

NETH.

E S T .

L A T . LITH.

BE L A R US

U K R A I N E

PO L AND

BU L G ARIA

THE G AMBIA

ZAMBIA

A N GO L A

N I G E R

LIBERIA C AME R OON

G A B ON

EQ U A T ORIAL GUINEA

GUINEA GUINE A -BIS S A U

M A L I M A URI T ANIA

SENE G AL

NIGERIA

D'I V OIRE C Ô TE

SIERRA LEONE

BURKI N A F ASO

CHAD

GHA N A

S A O T OME AND PRI N CIPE

C O N GO

RE P . OF THE

T ANZANIA

KEN Y A U G AN D A

AFRI C AN REPUBLIC CENTRAL

S U D A N

ETHIOPIA

OF THE C O N GO

DEMOCR A

REPUBLIC

ZIM B A B WE

B O T S W A N A

N AMIBIA

ERITREA

R W AN D A

BU R UNDI

MOZAMBIQUE

S W AZI L AND

AFRI C A SOUTH

LES O THO

MA L A WI

C APE VERDE YEMEN

S YRIA

GEO R GIA

IR A Q

T U R K E Y

JORDAN

KU W AIT

S A UDI

ARABIA

MOLD O V

I R A N AFGHANISTAN

PAKISTAN

B AHRAIN

Q A T AR

OMAN

DJIBOUTI

TURKMENSTANI

KY R G YZ S T AN

T AJIKI S T AN

K A Z A K H S T A N

M A URITIUS MA D A G AS C AR

SOMALIA

R U S S I A

M O N G O L I A

I N D I A

B A N G L ADESH

BURMA

NE P AL BHU T AN

SRI L ANKA

C H I N A

J A P AN

N O R TH K OREA

SOUTH K OREA

PHILIPPINES

THAI L AND

C AMBODIA

VIET N AM

SINGAPORE

B R UNEI

M A L A Y S I A

I N D O N E S I A PAPUA

NEW GUINEA

NEW ZEALAND

SOLOMON ISLANDS

V

I

UNITED ARAB EMIRATES

UZBEKISTAN

AZERBAIJAN ARMENIA

ISRAEL

LEBANON

LAOS

ARGENTINA

Conclusion

• CANSO playing active role in Regional ATFM/CDM formulation and development

• ATFM Benefits will be evident for all stakeholders • An ATFM ConOps and roadmap for implementation needs to be

developed for the ME region • Supports ATFM/CDM implementation in the Middle East • ANSPs need to work together to common goal • All stakeholders need to be involved from inception • ATFM/CDM needs support from Executive Management • Learn from other ANSPs and regions