Draft version October 6, 2017Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 12/16/11

DYNAMICAL EVOLUTION INDUCED BY PLANET NINE

Konstantin Batygin1, Alessandro Morbidelli2

1Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, 1200 E. California Blvd., Pasadena, CA 91125 and2Laboratoire Lagrange, Universit Cote d’Azur, Observatoire de la Cote d’Azur, CNRS, CS 34229, 06304 Nice, France

Draft version October 6, 2017

ABSTRACT

The observational census of trans-Neptunian objects with semi-major axes greater than ∼ 250 AUexhibits unexpected orbital structure that is most readily attributed to gravitational perturbationsinduced by a yet-undetected, massive planet. Although the capacity of this planet to (i) reproducethe observed clustering of distant orbits in physical space, (ii) facilitate dynamical detachment of theirperihelia from Neptune, and (iii) excite a population of long-period centaurs to extreme inclinationsis well established through numerical experiments, a coherent theoretical description of the dynamicalmechanisms responsible for these effects remains elusive. In this work, we characterize the dynamicalprocesses at play, from semi-analytic grounds. We begin by considering a purely secular model oforbital evolution induced by Planet Nine, and show that it is at odds with the ensuing stability ofdistant objects. Instead, the long-term survival of the clustered population of long-period KBOs isenabled by a web of mean-motion resonances driven by Planet Nine. Then, by taking a compact-formapproach to perturbation theory, we show that it is the secular dynamics embedded within theseresonances that regulates the orbital confinement and perihelion detachment of distant Kuiper beltobjects. Finally, we demonstrate that the onset of large-amplitude oscillations of orbital inclinationsis accomplished through capture of low-inclination objects into a high-order secular resonance andidentify the specific harmonic that drives the evolution. In light of the developed qualitative under-standing of the governing dynamics, we offer an updated interpretation of the current observationaldataset within the broader theoretical framework of the Planet Nine hypothesis.

1. INTRODUCTION

Over the course of one hundred and seventy years thatfollowed the successful prediction of Neptune (LeVerrier1846; Adams 1846), the presence of additional planetswithin the solar system has been contemplated by anextensive list of astronomers and celestial mechanicians(Hoyt 1980). Historically, the lines of evidence for theexistence of distant, massive bodies that orbit the sunhave ranged from the (apparently) anomalous motion ofUranus (Pickering & Pickering 1909; Lowell 1915) andunexpected orbital characteristics of long-period comets(Forbes 1880; Matese & Whitmire 1986), to the peculiarstructure of the solar system’s small body populations(Brunini & Melita 2002; Gladman & Chan 2006; Gomeset al. 2006; Lykawka & Mukai 2008; Trujillo & Sheppard2014; Volk & Malhotra 2017). The predicted physicaland orbital properties of the putative planets have beenequally as varied, with inferred masses and semi-majoraxes spanning the Mars-Jupiter range and tens to thou-sands of astronomical units, respectively.

A recent addition to the aggregate of planetary pre-dictions within the solar system is the Planet Nine hy-pothesis1 (Batygin & Brown 2016a). Within the frame-work of this model, the observed orbital clustering of

1 The Planet Nine hypothesis was inspired by the work of Tru-jillo & Sheppard (2014), who noted that the arguments of perihe-lion (the angle between the apsidal and nodal lines on an orbit) ofdistant Kuiper belt objects are grouped together. In contrast withthis finding, the primary aim of Planet Nine’s inferred influence isto explain the simultaneous clustering of the longitudes of perihe-lion (a proxy for the direction of the pericenter in physical space)and the longitudes of ascending node (orientation of the orbitalplane).

a & 250 AU Kuiper belt objects (Figure 1) is sculpted bya m ∼ 10m⊕ planet residing on an appreciably eccentric(e ∼ 0.3−0.7), large semi-major axis (a ∼ 300−700 AU)orbit, whose plane roughly coincides with the plane ofthe distant bodies, and is characterized by periheliondirection that is anti-aligned with respect to the aver-age apsidal orientation of the KBOs. In addition to(i) facilitating the orbital confinement of the aforemen-tioned population of long-period KBOs and (ii) providinga physical mechanism for the perihelion detachment ofSedna-type orbits from Neptune, the presence of PlanetNine entails a series of additional consequences for theobserved structure of the solar system (Brown & Baty-gin 2016). In particular, it has been shown that the dy-namical effects of Planet Nine naturally explain (iii) theexistence of highly inclined, large semi-major axis Cen-taurs (Gomes et al. 2015; Batygin & Brown 2016a), (iv)the six-degree obliquity of the sun (Bailey et al. 2016;Lai 2016; Gomes et al. 2017), as well as (v) the originsof proximate (a < 100 AU) retrograde KBOs (Batygin &Brown 2016b).

A key characteristic that differentiates the variousplanetary proposals is the dynamical mechanism throughwhich the envisaged planet generates its observationalsignatures. In this regard, the Planet Nine (P9) hypoth-esis remains incomplete. While numerical simulationsreveal that synthetic models of the solar system that in-clude Planet Nine can provide a good match to the ob-servational data (see however Nesvorny et al. 2017), thedynamical process through which physical confinementof the distant orbits occurs remains poorly understood.

The original study of Batygin & Brown (2016a) sug-gested that mean-motion resonances (including those

arX

iv:1

710.

0180

4v1

[as

tro-

ph.E

P] 4

Oct

201

7

2

of high order) are responsible for orbital clustering.Expanding on this idea, Malhotra et al. (2016) havesuggested that each of the distant KBOs are cur-rently trapped in N :1 and N :2 mean motion resonances(MMRs) with Planet Nine. More recently, Millholland& Laughlin (2017); Becker et al. (2017) have carried outa large-scale numerical exploration of the resonant hy-pothesis in relation to the existing data, further demon-strating its viability. Meanwhile, Beust (2016) has shownthat a purely secular treatment of the dynamics pro-vides a good match to the simulation results of Baty-gin & Brown (2016a), suggesting that resonant dynam-ics may be irrelevant to the problem at hand. In light ofthese conflicting results, the dominant P9-KBO interac-tion mechanism remains elusive, and its identification isthe primary purpose of this paper.

Analytical characterization of P9-KBO coupling is im-portant for three reasons, the first being falsifiability.The specific perturbation mechanism (along with thedata it aims to explain) draws the distinction betweenvarious planetary hypotheses, and can be used to refutea specific model upon confrontation with the data. As anexample, suppose that an observational survey discoversa planet at a radial separation of a few hundred AU, butthe gravitational effects of this planet do not facilitatea physical confinement among the distant KBO orbitsthrough the envisioned dynamical process2. Such a dis-covery would imply that the Planet Nine hypothesis, asformulated, is incorrect.

A second, more practical motivation for studying P9-KBO interactions is the link between existing observa-tions and the predicted orbit of Planet Nine. That is, ifall distant KBOs are presently trapped in MMRs withP9, their mean longitudes may contain information aboutthe location of Planet Nine on its orbit (Malhotra et al.2016; Millholland & Laughlin 2017). If, on the otherhand, the interactions are purely secular, such a connec-tion cannot be established3. Therefore, understandingthe physics of P9-KBO coupling can offer a more com-plete interpretation of the extant observational dataset,and may yield an avenue towards further constrainingthe astronomical search for Planet Nine.

The third, and final reason for this study is purelyacademic. While the exploration of the circular re-stricted three-body problem (as a paradigm for inter-actions between planets and small bodies in the solarsystem) dates back multiple centuries (Laplace 1799;Poincare 1902), its highly elliptical counterpart remainsmuch more scarcely understood (see e.g. Beauge et al.2006; Michtchenko et al. 2006; Pichierri et al. 2017). In-deed, a well-formulated theory for gravitational couplingbetween a planet and a test particle in the severe orbit-crossing regime does not currently exist. As a result, aperturbative study of P9 dynamics can yield interestinginsights into the general mathematical structure of inter-actions among highly excited orbits. Such a frameworkwould have considerable applications beyond the prob-lem at hand, including the characterization of the re-

2 We note that the existence of a trans-Neptunian planet atan orbital separation of a few hundred AU was first proposed byForbes (1880).

3 The process of orbital averaging inherent to secular perturba-tion theory removes all information related to the mean anomaliesof the interacting bodies (Morbidelli 2002).

Sedna

250

AU

semi-major axis > 250 AU inclination < 40 deg perihelion > 30 AU

2012 VP113

2014 FE72

2015 GT50

scaled Runge-Lenz vectors

2013 SY99

2015 KG163

Fig. 1.— Current observational census of the distant Kuiper belt.Thirteen known objects with semi-major axes greater than 250 AUand perihelion distance greater than 30 AU are shown in physicalspace, and are color-coded in accord with their dynamical class, asdictated by the Planet Nine hypothesis. Orbits belonging to theprimary longitude of perihelion cluster (inferred to be apsidallyanti-aligned with the orbit of Planet Nine) are shown in purple.Orbits that are diametrically opposed to the primary cluster (pre-sumed to be apsidally aligned with the orbit of Planet Nine) areshown in green. The outlying object that does not correspond toeither population is shown in gray. Each orbit is further labeledby its scaled Runge-Lenz vector, which is color-coded in the sameway.

markable dynamical states of highly eccentric, resonantexoplanets (Lee 2004; Tan et al. 2013).

Before delving into calculations, we delineate a list ofspecific questions we wish to answer in this work.

• What role (if any) do resonant interactions playwithin the dynamical evolution induced by PlanetNine? If resonances are prevalent, what or-der/multiplet harmonics dominate the dynamics,and what are their characteristic widths?

• What role (if any) do secular interactions playwithin the dynamical evolution induced by PlanetNine? If dominant, how are close encountersavoided on nearly co-planar, anti-aligned orbits?Moreover, if resonant interactions are relevant tothe Planet Nine hypothesis, why does the purelysecular phase-space portrait provide a good matchto the results of numerical simulations?

• What parameters determine the critical semi-major axis corresponding to the transitionbetween randomized and clustered longitudes ofperihelion? What physical effect controls thistransition?

• What is the qualitative behavior of inclination dy-namics within the framework of P9-driven evolu-tion? What dynamical process allows some of theobjects to acquire exceptionally high inclinationsin the distant Kuiper belt?

We take these questions as an approximate guide to

3

36000

0.25

0.5

0.75

1

0

0.25

0.5

0.75

1

90 180 270$ (deg)

0 90 180 270 360$ (deg)

0 90 180 270 360$ (deg)

e

e

a = 50AU a = 150AU a = 250AU

a = 350AU a = 450AU a = 550AU

Neptune crossing orbits q = a8

anti-aligned orbits

collisional domain

collisional domain

collisional domain

collisional domain

q = a8

aligned orbits

Fig. 2.— Purely secular dynamics induced upon Kuiper belt objects by Planet Nine. Each panel is labeled by the corresponding valueof the particle’s semi-major axis, and depicts contours of the doubly averaged Hamiltonian (1) in eccentricity - longitude of perihelion(measured relative to the apsidal line of Planet Nine) space. In panels characterized by a > 250 AU, secular equilibria corresponding toboth apsidally aligned (∆$ = 0) as well as anti-aligned (∆$ = 180 deg) configurations emerge, and are segregated by tangential collisioncurves, shown as thick curves. Note that in spite of the apparent smoothness of the level curves of the averaged Hamiltonian surroundingthe anti-aligned equilibrium points, this region of phase-space describes orbital configurations that are not protected from close encounters,and thus entails a long-term unstable orbital evolution. Moreover, notice that only apsidally aligned configurations that are close to the∆$ = 0 equilibrium points are protected from close encounters by the geometrical collinearity of the orbits.

the logic of the paper, which is structured as follows.In section 2, we revisit a purely secular description ofP9-induced orbital evoluition, carrying out the averag-ing procedure in closed form. In section 3, we considera pair of idealized N -body simulations and outline thekey differences between numerical experiments and puresecular theory. In section 4, we present a semi-analyticaltheory of resonant P9-KBO interactions, and elucidatesecular dynamics embedded within mean-motion reso-nances as the primary driver of apsidal confinement ofdistant KBOs. Subsequently, we discuss the onset oflarge-scale inclination oscillations of long-period bodiesin section 5. We then re-examine the existing observa-tional data in light of the aforementioned theoretical de-velopments in section 6. We summarize and discuss theimplications of our results in section 7. A brief analy-sis of long-term stable, but apsidally unconfined orbits ispresented in the appendix.

2. PURELY SECULAR DYNAMICS

We begin our study of Planet Nine-induced dynam-ics within the framework of purely secular perturbationtheory. In Batygin & Brown (2016a), our preliminaryexploration of secular dynamics relied on an octupole or-der expansion of the gravitational potential (Kaula 1962;Mardling 2013), that implicitly assumed that the or-bits under consideration do not cross. Following Beust(2016), here we abandon the series-expansion approachto modeling P9-KBO coupling, and carry out the phase-averaging procedure in closed form.

As in Batygin & Brown (2016a); Beust (2016), we as-sume coplanarity, and model the mean-field effects of theknown giant planets neglecting their eccentricities. Fur-

ther, we choose to work in a slowly rotating coordinateframe, that co-precesses with Planet Nine’s perihelion(the corresponding contact transformation is spelled outin Batygin & Brown 2016a). The governing (doubly av-eraged) Hamiltonian of a test particle under planetaryperturbations then has the form:

Hs = −1

4

GMa

1(1− e2

)3/2 8∑j=5

mj a2j

M a2

+ $9

√GMa

(1−

√1− e2

)− 1

4π2

∮ ∮ Gm9

|r− r9|dλ dλ9, (1)

where G is the gravitational constant, M is the massof the sun, r is the position vector, λ is the mean lon-gitude, a is semi-major axis, e is eccentricity, and $ isthe longitude of perihelion. All quantities pertaining tothe four canonical giant planets are labeled with indexes5− 8, while the values corresponding to Planet Nine aredenoted with the subscript 9. The unlabeled variablescorrespond to the Kuiper belt object. Finally, PlanetNine’s orbit-averaged precession rate is given by the ex-pression4:

$9 =3

4

√GMa39

1(1− e29

)2 8∑j=5

mj a2j

M a29. (2)

The three terms present in equation (1) have sim-ple physical interpretations. The first term governs the

4 Note that there is a typo in the corresponding expression inBatygin & Brown (2016a).

4

secular advance of the KBO’s perihelion due to thephase-averaged gravitational potential of Jupiter, Sat-urn, Uranus, and Neptune (in direct parallel with equa-tion 2). The second term accounts for the fact that thereference frame is slowly rotating. The third term gov-erns secular P9-KBO interactions. Note that the indirectpart of the disturbing potential is by default entirely av-eraged out within the framework of secular theory, andneed not be accounted for (Morbidelli 2002).

The only pair of dynamical variables present in Hamil-tonian (1) is (e,∆$), meaning that the system is inte-grable. In other words, contours of the numerically aver-aged function (1) fully encapsulate the accompanying or-bital evolution. Figure (2) shows the secular phase-spaceportraits of the system, projected into e − ∆$ space,for a = 50, 150, ..., 550 AU, adopting P9 parameters fromBatygin & Brown (2016a) (specifically, a9 = 700 AU,e9 = 0.6 and m9 = 10m⊕). This figure can be readilycompared with Figure (4) of Batygin & Brown (2016a),and confirms that the purely secular portrait provides agood match to the numerically computed portraits in thesame dynamical regime (Beust 2016).

On all panels denoted by a > 250 AU, e − ∆$ spaceis characterized by two stable equilibrium points: one at∆$ = 0 and another at ∆$ = 180 deg. On each dia-gram, the two libration regions surrounding these fixedpoints are separated by a solid curve, which correspondsto a tangential configuration of the KBO and P9 orbits.Note further that on these tangential contact curves, the

derivatives of the Hamiltonian are discontinuous (i.e. Hs

is locally class C0), signaling a breakdown of the secularframework (Gronchi 2002).

A simple examination of the contours of Hs depictedon Figure (2) reveals that KBOs initialized on nearlyNeptune-crossing orbits (immediately below horizontallines labeled by q = a8) will suffer drastically differentsecular evolutions depending on their starting value of∆$. Bodies initially close to ∆$ ∼ 0 will be drivenonto the tangential orbit-crossing curves through apsi-dal precession, and will eventually be removed from thesystem by recurrent close encounters with Planet Nine.On the other hand, objects initialized at ∆$ ∼ π settleonto secular trajectories that encircle that anti-alignedequilibrium, and never encounter the tangential collisioncurves. Thus, the dynamical lifetimes of apsidally anti-aligned objects can be naıvely envisioned to be longerthan their aligned counterparts, and in time, a cluster ofexclusively anti-aligned orbits should be carved out byPlanet Nine.

We note further that there is an island of stable ap-sidal libration around ∆$ = 0 that avoids crossing thetangential configuration curve and is thus protected fromclose-encounters. However, the eccentricities along theseprotected orbits are moderate and the corresponding per-ihelion distances are large. This means that even if KBOssomehow came to occupy these islands of stability, theywould be difficult to detect observationally.

With this picture in mind, it is tempting to affirm thatthe agreement between theory and simulation is satis-factory, and proceed forward within the purely secularframework. This is however a misconception, facilitatedby the apparent smoothness of the secular phase-spaceportraits shown in Figure (2). In particular, the fact that

the contours ofHs do not show any kinks within the apsi-dally anti-aligned domain is simply a consequence of theintegrability of the non-tangential singularity (Thomas& Morbidelli 1996; Gronchi & Milani 1998), and doesnot mean that the system can elude collisions. Instead,recalling that the physical setup of the orbits is planar,it is trivial to demonstrate that under the assumptionof uncorrelated Keplerian motion, all objects entrainedin the apsidally anti-aligned configuration with PlanetNine would suffer close-encounters on timescales muchshorter than the age of the solar system. Therefore,despite giving the illusion of agreement with N -bodysimulations, pure secular theory predicts that the entiredistant Kuiper belt is dynamically unstable, and shouldhave been cleared out on a timescale comparable to theorbital precession time.

Contrary to this view, published numerical experi-ments reveal that particles residing deep within the coresof the anti-aligned libration regions of Figure (2) remainstable over the multi-Gyr lifetime of the solar system(Batygin & Brown 2016a; Brown & Batygin 2016). Thisdisparity suggests that secular theory alone is unlikelyto represent a full dynamical description of P9-drivenevolution, and an additional stabilizing mechanism is atplay in the simulations. Let us now examine this pointfurther.

3. NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS

To quantify the discrepancy between published simula-tions and pure secular theory, we carry out a pair of sim-plified numerical experiments that mirror those reportedin (Batygin & Brown 2016a; Brown & Batygin 2016).In particular, we evolve an initially axisymmetric diskof 6,000 eccentric test-particles with a ∈ (150, 750) AUand q ∈ (30, 36) AU, under the influence of the phase-averaged potential of the four inner giants as well asPlanet Nine with (a9, e9) = (700 AU, 0.6) and (a9, e9) =(600 AU, 0.5). The test particles are initialized with anull vertical velocity dispersion and thus remain confinedto Planet Nine’s orbital plane throughout the simulation.

Unlike the simulation suite of Batygin & Brown(2016a); Brown & Batygin (2016); Millholland & Laugh-lin (2017); Becker et al. (2017) where Neptune was mod-eled directly, or that of Batygin & Brown (2016b) wherethe Keplerian motion of all four inner giants was resolved,here we emulate the effects of Jupiter, Saturn, Uranusand Neptune with an effective quadrupolar gravitationalmoment of the Sun:

J2 =

(3 cos2(i9)− 1

4

) 8∑j=5

mj a2j

MR2, (3)

setting the inner absorbing radius to R = 20 AU. Thisidealization is employed specifically to avoid contaminat-ing P9-induced KBO evolution with chaotic dynamicsthat arise from scattering off of Neptune, and to yieldthe closest point of comparison between numerical andsemi-analytical results. Moreover, here we will assumethat the inclination of Planet Nine relative to the Laplaceplane of the canonical giant planets is sufficiently smallto approximate cos(i9) ≈ 1, while keeping in mind thatz−axis of our coordinate system coincides with the or-bital plane of Planet Nine.

To carry out the simulations, we utilized the mercury6

5

1:1

3:2

2:1

3:1

4:1

5:1

6:1

6:5

5:4

4:3

5:2

9:2

11:2

5:3

7:4

7:2

7:1

8:1

apsi

dal

circ

ulat

ion

anti-

alig

ned

apsi

dal

libra

tion

m9 = 10ma9 = 700AU

e9 = 0.6

m9 = 10ma9 = 600AU

e9 = 0.5

0 0.20.1 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.00

5

10

15

0

5

10

15

orbital period ratio ( P / P9 )

N

N

25

28

Fig. 3.— A histogram summarizing the orbital distribution of simulated particles with dynamical lifetimes that exceed 4 Gyr. Beyonda critical orbital period ratio (P/P9 & 0.1 for a9 = 700 AU, e9 = 0.6 and P/P9 & 0.15 for a9 = 600 AU, e9 = 0.5), all surviving membersof the distant scattered disk reside in mean-motion resonances with Planet Nine, and derive their long-term stability from the associatedphase-protection mechanism. The final orbital configurations of distant bodies sculpted by Planet Nine are similar in both numericalexperiments, and show the onset of clustering in longitude of perihelion beyond the 3:1 mean motion resonance. Correspondingly, binscontaining particles locked in a stable pattern of anti-aligned apsidal libration are shown in black, while bins containing objects withcirculating longitudes of perihelion are shown in gray. The commensurabilities possessing the largest number of apsidally confined particlesare indicated with blue triangles.

gravitational dynamics software package (Chambers1999). The integrations were performed using the hybridWisdom-Holman/Bulirsch-Stoer algorithm (Wisdom &Holman 1992; Press et al. 1992), with a time-step of∆t = 3, 100 days (i.e. 1/10 th of Uranus’ orbital period),and spanned 4 Gyr. Any particle that attained a radialdistance of r < R or r > 10, 000 AU was removed fromthe simulations.

Within the context of these idealized numerical exper-iments, all long-term stable particles retain nearly con-stant semi-major axes throughout the integration, andFigure (3) depicts an orbital histogram of the surviv-ing bodies. Bins shown in black correspond to apsidallyconfined objects (defined by |∆$ − 180 deg | 6 90 degthroughout the simulation), while those shown in graydenote particles that are long-term stable, but experienceapsidal circulation. We note that here, the gray bins arestacked on top of the black bins, such that the relativesize of gray and black components of each column is ameasure of the contamination of apsidally confined pop-ulation of objects (at a given semi-major axis) by thoseundergoing perihelion circulation.

A strong propensity towards apsidal clustering forP/P9 & 1/3 is clearly evident in both simulations. How-ever, it is also important to note that the same orbitalperiods (e.g. those corresponding to the 3:1, 2:1, and 1:1commensurabilities in Figure 3) can be simultaneouslyoccupied by apsidally circulating and librating orbits.This means that even within the framework of highlyidealized treatment of P9-induced dynamics, the cluster-ing of the longitude of perihelion beyond a critical semi-major axis is not perfectly strict, and the existence ofobjects that do not conform to the general anti-alignedorbital pattern is an expected consequence of the model(Shankman et al. 2017).

In addition to the already established tendency to-wards orbital clustering with increasing orbital period,

it can be clearly seen in Figure (3) that all long-livedobjects which exhibit perihelion confinement have semi-major axes that correspond to mean-motion commensu-rabilities with Planet Nine. Particularly, the 1:1, 3:2, 2:1,and 5:2 resonances contain the largest populations of ap-sidally clustered KBOs in both simulations5. This pointundercuts a key difference between the results of N -bodysimulations and pure secular theory, and demonstratesthat (at least within the framework of a planar physicalsetup) distant KBOs derive their long-term orbital sta-bility from the phase-protection mechanism inherent tomean-motion resonances.

The typical dynamical evolutions of bodies trapped inthe four aforementioned resonances are shown in Fig-ure (4). Specifically, the left and middle panels depictthe evolutions of orbital eccentricities and apsidal lines.On timescales of order ∼ 0.1 − 1 Gyr, orbital eccentric-ities experience considerable oscillations in concert withlibrations of ∆$. This facilitates a periodic regression ofthe KBO perihelion distance, generating dynamically de-tached (Sedna-type) orbits (Gladman et al. 2002; Brownet al. 2004).

Of particular importance is the behavior of the reso-nant angles:

ψres = k λ9 − ` λ− (k − `)$,φres = k λ9 − ` λ− (k − `)$9, (4)

where k and ` are integers (note that for |k−`| > 1, addi-tional resonant harmonics related to these angles through∆$ exist). On the right panels of Figure (4), ψres is plot-ted in green and φres is plotted in black. The actual li-brations of φres and ψres are short-periodic (as portrayed

5 We note that these simulations are not intended to representa full exploration of the resonant capture probabilities within thecontext of the Planet Nine hypothesis. A more complete estimationthese probabilities is presented in a companion paper (Bailey et al.2017).

6

0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4

1:1 MMR a = 700 AU resonant libration around 0 deg

resonant libration around 180 deg

resonant libration around 0 deg

resonant libration around 180 deg

3:2 MMR a = 534 AU

2:1 MMR a = 441 AU

5:2 MMR a = 380 AU

0

90

180

270

360

0

90

180

270

360-180

-90

0

90

180

270

360

0

90

180

270

360

0

90

180

270

360

0

90

180

0

90

180

270

360-180

-90

0

90

180

0

0.25

0.5

0.75

1

0

0.25

0.5

0.75

1

0

0.25

0.5

0.75

1

0

0.25

0.5

0.75

1

time (Gyr) time (Gyr)time (Gyr)

$ (deg) resonant angles (deg)apsidal angleeccentricity e

res res

Fig. 4.— Orbital time series of four resonant objects drawn from the N -body simulation with m9 = 10m⊕, a9 = 700 AU and e9 = 0.6.The left and middle panels show oscillations of the eccentricities and the relative longitudes of perihelion respectively, while the rightpanels depict the behavior of the resonant angles φres (black) and ψres (green). Generally, particles that exhibit stable anti-aligned apsidallibration (such as those shown in this Figure) are characterized by low-amplitude oscillation of φres with a period equal to that of librationof ∆$ (not to be confused with the actual libration amplitude of φres, which is short periodic and corresponds to the thickness of the black“band”, as shown in the inset of the top-right panel). On the contrary, orbital evolution driven primarily by low-amplitude libration ofa resonant harmonic that contains $ (rather than only $9 as in φres) corresponds to circulation of the longitude of perihelion (examplesshown in the appendix). Note that φres librates around 0 for the 1:1 & 2:1 MMRs and around 180 deg for the 3:2 & 5:2 MMRs.

by the inset within the top-right panel of Figure 4) andtheir amplitudes correspond to the thickness of the greenand black “bands.” Meanwhile, the long-periodic oscilla-tions of these angles are mere reflections of the librationsof ∆$, which modulate the locations of the resonantequilibria associated with φres and ψres.

The fact that the amplitude of long-periodic oscilla-tions of φres is much smaller than that of ψres for orbitsthat exhibit libration in ∆$, demonstrates that the reso-nant multiplets containing φres represent a better approx-imation of the real dynamics than those containing ψres.In particular, if the Hamiltonian depended only on φres,this angle would have no long-periodic oscillations whileψres (being equal to φres + (` − k) ∆$) would oscillatewith the amplitude and period of |(`− k)|∆$. The op-posite would be true if the Hamiltonian dependent onlyon ψres. Thus the relative amplitudes of long-periodic

oscillations of the these angles are inversely correlated tothe relative strengths of the corresponding terms. Ac-cordingly, in our analytic approach in the next sectionwe will consider φres as a reference angle, in contrast toMalhotra et al. (2016) and Beust (2016), who consideredψres instead.

Only containing the longitude of perihelion of PlanetNine and not that of the Kuiper belt objects themselves,the (short-periodic) libration of φres drives the oscilla-tion of the particle’s semi-major axis but does not af-fect the evolution of its eccentricity. Thus, the libra-tion in φres, sometimes referred to as “corotation” res-onance, already implies a certain disconnect among thedegrees of freedom related to the particle’s semi-majoraxis and its eccentricity. Moreover, the striking sepa-ration of timescales associated with resonant (φres − a)dynamics and secular (e−∆$) dynamics motivates the

7

construction of the semi-analytical model that will fol-low, based on the adiabatic approach.

The dominant dependence of the resonant dynamics onφres, as opposed to another harmonic that contains $ inits critical argument, is central to maintaining apsidallyanti-aligned libration of the orbits. In fact, long-termstable particles whose resonant dynamics is driven by anyangle other than φres exhibit circulation of the longitudeof perihelion, and correspond to objects denoted as graybins in Figure (3). Although characterizing the dynamicsin this transitionary semi-major axis range is not theprimary purpose of this study, we present a brief analysisof this mode of orbital evolution in the appendix.

4. SEMI-ANALYTICAL THEORY

As shown in the previous section, all surviving mem-bers of the synthetic scattered disk that exhibit persis-tent apsidal anti-alignment with Planet Nine’s orbit arelocked into mean-motion resonances with P9. The pur-pose of the following analysis is thus to explain this be-havior from semi-analytic grounds. To achieve this goal,we consider the isolated resonant behavior first. As insection (2), we will abandon traditional methods of ce-lestial mechanics based on series-expansions, and cast ouranalysis of the governing Hamiltonian in closed form.

4.1. Mean Motion Resonances

In order to carry out the averaging process numericallyand elucidate the φres − a resonant dynamics, we set upa rigorous Hamiltonian approach to the problem. Asis typical for the planar restricted three body problem,the canonical Poincare action-angle variables for the testparticle are (Murray & Dermott 1999):

Λ =√GM a λ =M+$

Γ =√GM a

(1−

√1− e2

)γ = −$ (5)

where M is the mean anomaly. In terms of these vari-ables, the Hamiltonian of the problem is (Morbidelli2002)

Hr = −1

2

(GMΛ

)2

− Gm9

(1

|r− r9|− r · r9|r9|3

). (6)

The vector r can be written as a function of the canon-ical variables (5). Similarly, r9 can be expressed as afunction of the parameters a9, e9, which are assumed tobe fixed in time, as well as the angles λ9 and $9, whichare assumed to advance with fixed frequencies, n9 and$9 respectively. Thus, Hamiltonian (6) depends on timethrough these two planetary angles.

In order to remove explicit time dependence from equa-tion (6), we extend the phase space by two degrees offreedom. That is, we consider λ9 and γ9 = −$9 asindependent variables, with conjugated actions Λ9 andΓ9. Correspondingly, we add the term (n9 Λ9 − $9 Γ9)to expression (6), making the Hamiltonian autonomous.Of course, in doing so we do not alter the dynam-ics in any way, since dλ9/dt = ∂Hr/∂Λ9 = n9 andd$9/dt = −dγ9/dt = −∂Hr/∂Γ9 = $9.

We now denote the mean motion of the particle byn = G2M2

/Λ3 and assume that there is a resonance

of the kind k n9 − ` n = 0 for some integers k and `.

534

536

538

705

710

445

700

695

690

532

530

443

441

439

437

382

381

380

379

3780 90 180 270 360

1:1 MMR

3:2 MMR

2:1 MMR

5:2 MMR

res (deg)

a(A

U)

a(A

U)

a(A

U)

a(A

U)

collis

ion

curv

es

Fig. 5.— Resonant phase-space portraits of the four most pop-ulated mean-motion commensurabilities, projected into a − φresspace. The color scale and the black contours correspond to levelcurves of the singly averaged Hamiltonian (10), while the verti-cal black lines denote collision curves. Resonant contours of theHamiltonian that come into contact with the collision curves areshown as thick purple lines, and thereby inform the widths of thecorresponding resonances. These phase-space diagrams adopt ourfiducial P9 parameters and assume that the Kuiper belt objects arecharacterized by a fixed value of Γ that corresponds to q = 35 AUat nominal resonance and ∆γ = π. The red curves that encirclethe elliptic equilibria in each panel represent the a − φres evolu-tion of the particles shown in Figure (3) near ∆$ = π, and signalexcellent agreement with theory.

8

538

536

532

5300 90 180 270 360

res (deg)

a(A

U)

534

0 90 180 270 360

res (deg)

0 90 180 270 360

res (deg)

0 90 180 270 360

res (deg)

3:2 MMR $ = $col

$ = 100 deg $ = 140 deg $ = 180 deg

apsidal anti-alignmentapsidal alignment $

resonant domain occupied by stable apsidally anti-aligned orbits

Fig. 6.— Resonant phase-space portraits associated with the 3:2 mean motion commensurability at different values of the relativelongitude of perihelion, ∆$. As the orbital configuration progressively shifts away from exact anti-alignment of perihelia, the resonantdomain occupied by stable orbits shown in Figure (5) shrinks, until it is fully engulfed by the collision curves. Correspondingly, this processimposes a limit on maximal deviation from strict apsidal anti-alignment that a resonant trajectory can endure before experiencing closeencounters with Planet Nine. The depicted portraits were computed assuming a value of Γ that corresponds to the equilibrium eccentricityof the resonant-secular phase-space portrait, and their (e,∆$) coordinates are shown with open circles on Figure (7).

It is then appropriate to make the following canonicaltransformation6

Λ′ = Λ/` φ′res = −φresΛ′9 = Λ9 + (k/`) Λ λ′9 = λ9

Γ′ = Γ ∆γ = γ − γ9 = −∆$

Γ′9 = Γ9 + Γ + ((k − `)/`) Λ γ′9 = γ9.(7)

The unperturbed part of the Hamiltonian (the termindependent of m9) becomes:(

Hr

)kep

= −1

2

(GMΛ

)2

+ n9(Λ′9 − kΛ′)

− $9 (Γ′9 − Γ− (k − `) Λ′). (8)

Because ∂(Hr)kep/∂Λ′ = ` n− k n9 = 0 there is only onefast angle in the Hamiltonian, and it is λ′9. Thus, theperturbation can be averaged over this angle, leading to(Hr

)pert

= −Gm9

2π `

∫ 2π`

0

(1

|r− r9|− r · r9|r9|3

)dλ9. (9)

It is easy to see from d’Alembert rules, that the aver-aged Hamiltonian can depend only on two angles: φ′resand ∆γ. Thus, Λ′9 and Γ′9 are constants of motion andcan be dropped. The Hamiltonian now comprises a twodegree of freedom system, and is not integrable. How-ever, we note that the degree of freedom in (Γ′,∆γ) ischaracterized by a frequency of order ∝ m9/M, and isslow relative to the other degree of freedom in (Λ′, φ′res),whose frequency is of the order of ∝

√m9/M (Henrard

& Caranicolas 1990).Taking advantage of the aforementioned separation of

timescales between the resonant and secular dynamics,we may evaluate the phase-space portrait associated withthe resonant Hamiltonian in the adiabatic approxima-tion, by freezing the evolution of the KBO’s eccentricityand apsidal line relative to the major axis of Planet Nine(Wisdom 1985). In particular, we compute the function

Hr = −GM2 a

− n9(k

`

)√GM a

6 This contact transformation arises from a type-2 generatingfunction of the form F2 = −Λ′(kλ9 − `λ + (k − `)γ9) + Λ′9(λ9) +Γ′(γ − γ9) + Γ′9(γ9).

− Gm9

2π `

∫ 2π`

0

(1

|r− r9|− r · r9|r9|3

)∣∣∣∣φres

dλ9, (10)

on a (φres − a) grid, setting the quantities Γ and ∆γ tospecific values. We note that unlike the doubly averagedHamiltonian (1), here the averaging process is carriedout only over λ9, under the restriction of the resonantrelationship dictated by equation (4). Moreover, the in-direct part of the disturbing function must be retainedin this case.

Of particular interest to the problem at hand are theresonant phase-space portraits of KBOs in apsidally anti-aligned configurations with respect to Planet Nine, withperihelion distances characteristic of typical scattereddisk objects (i.e. q ∼ a8). Suitably, adopting ∆γ = πand a value for Γ that corresponds to q = 35 AU ata = (`/k)2/3 a9 for the frozen degree of freedom, we havecomputed the averaged Hamiltonian (10) adopting pa-rameters relevant to the 1:1, 3:2, 2:1, and 5:2 MMRs.The corresponding φres − a diagrams are presented inFigure (5), on which we also plot N−body trajectories ofparticles shown in Figure (4) in red. It is clear that irre-spective of the specific resonance argument, the topologyof Hres is keenly reminiscent of a pendulum-like struc-ture, that has been cut into two separate domains byvertical lines. These lines depict collision curves - i.e.values of φres for which the averaging process fails dueto the inherent singularity. Importantly, this means thata trajectory residing within one domain cannot migrateto the other domain without compromising the phase-protection mechanism of mean-motion resonances.

Within each of the phase-space portraits shown in Fig-ure (5), one of the two domains contains a ∞-shapedseparatrix characterized by a hyperbolic equilibrium atits center, while the other domain possesses an ellipticfixed point at its core. Numerical integrations reported inthe previous section have shown that resonant trappingtypically occurs into the domain that does not host theseparatrix. That is, even though objects that exhibit sta-ble libration of φres 180 degrees away from those shownin Figure (4) do exist, they are very rare and we willnot consider their evolution in detail. We further notethat strictly speaking, phase-space evolution depicted inFigure (5) implies that the libration of φres does not rep-resent a formal resonance because it is not enclosed bya separatrix (Delisle et al. 2012). This point is however

9

0.25

$ (deg)

e

0

0.5

0.75

1

0 90 180 270 360

0.25

0

0.5

0.75

1

0 90 180 270 360

e

$ (deg)

1:1 MMR

e 0.5

0.75

1

0

0.25

0 90 180 270 360$ (deg)

2:1 MMR

0.25

0

0.5

0.75

1

0 90 180 270 360

e

$ (deg)

3:2 MMR

5:2 MMR

m9 = 10m

a9 = 700AU

e9 = 0.6

collision locus

N-body simulation

Fig. 7.— Eccentricity-perihelion diagrams showing long-term stable secular evolution facilitated by phase protection arising from φres-type resonances. For resonances other than 1:1, the e−∆$ domain is restricted by a collision locus, which arises from engulfment of thestable resonant equilibrium shown in Figure (5) by collision curves. Contours of the singly averaged resonant-secular Hamiltonian (12)are shown as black lines that follow the background color-scale, and N -body trajectories of particles shown in Figure (4) are over-plottedas orange curves. The clear agreement between semi-analytic perturbation theory and numerical experiments demonstrates that althoughthe long-term survival of distant Kuiper belt objects is enabled by resonant interactions, the clustering of longitudes of perihelion anddynamical detachment of orbits from Neptune arise from secular perturbations embedded within the resonances. The (e,∆$) coordinatesof resonant phase-space portraits depicted in Figure (6) are shown with open circles on the panel corresponding to the 3:2 MMR.

of little practical consequence, since the phase-protectionfacilitated by this pseudo-resonance patently representsa stabilizing mechanism for the simulated Kuiper Beltobjects.

4.2. Secular Dynamics Inside MMRs

Having characterized the evolution of the fast degree offreedom in the preceding subsection, we now consider sec-ular dynamics facilitated by resonant interactions. Gen-erally speaking, in order to compute a e − ∆$ phase-space diagram, we must specify the state of a− φres dy-namics everywhere on the domain. To do so, we onceagain rely on the principle of adiabatic invariance.

Because the period of oscillation of ∆$ greatly ex-ceeds that of φres, we can define the adiabatic invariant

(Neishtadt 1984)

J =

∮Λ′ dφ′res = −1

`

∮Λ dφres, (11)

associated with motion in the a− φres plane. Physically,this quasi-integral corresponds to the phase-space areaoccupied by the trajectory, and is conserved to an ex-cellent approximation, as long as the system does notencounter any criticality (i.e. hyperbolic fixed points,collision curves, etc; Henrard 1993). As can be seenfrom Figure (4), bodies entrained in MMRs with P9 canhave substantial libration amplitudes that are in essencedetermined by the state of the system at t = 0. Fordefinitiveness, here we ignore this complication and in-stead assume that the libration amplitude is null, mean-ing J = 0. From a computational point of view, theJ = 0 assumption is simplifying, since rather than find-

10

ing the correct phase-space trajectory in a − φres plane(specified by a given non-zero value of J ) at every combi-nation of e and ∆$, we instead suppose that the systemis adiabatically confined to the resonant fixed point, andcarry out the averaging process under the resonant equi-librium condition (Morbidelli & Moons 1993).

Because the resonant angle of interest φres only con-tains the longitude of perihelion of Planet Nine and notthat of the KBO (equation 4), the resonant equilibriumin a− φres plane always resides on the aeq = (`/k)2/3 a9line. On the contrary, the equilibrium value of φres itselfshifts away from φres = 0 deg or φres = 180 deg, in con-cert with oscillations of ∆$. Correspondingly, in orderto compute the equilibrium value of φres as a function ofe and ∆$, we evaluated the function Hres (equation 10)along the a = aeq axis at every grid point on the (e,∆$)plane, and found its local maximum.

Within certain regions of the e − ∆$ diagram, thecollision curves, shown as black vertical lines on Figure(5), can approach one-another such as to shrink the do-main within which the resonant trajectory resides. Thisprocess is demonstrated in Figure (6), which shows a se-ries of resonant a − φres diagrams corresponding to the3:2 MMR at various values of ∆$. Moreover, for spe-cific values of e and ∆$, the two collision curves cancross, engulfing the pseudo-resonant equilibrium point,which we assume the system occupies. In other words,the phase-space portrait in a−φres dictates a locus on thee − ∆$ plane that cannot be crossed without compro-mising the phase-protection mechanism inherent to meanmotion commensurabilities7. Consequently, even prior tocomputing the secular dynamics explicitly, we can iden-tify a restricted domain on e − ∆$ plane, bounded bythe collision locus, that can be stably explored by an anorbit trapped at the center of a mean motion resonance.

Generally speaking, the admissible domain shrinks asthe integer (k−`) increases. Accordingly, the full e−∆$plane is stable for the 1:1 MMR, but the stability regiontightly confined about the e ∼ 0.85, ∆$ ∼ π point forthe 5:2 resonance. For clarity, here we only compute thesecular diagram within this stability domain.

Expressing λ as a function of λ9 through the pre-computed stationary value of φres, we calculate the aver-aged Hamiltonian

Hrs =− 1

4

GMa

1(1− e2

)3/2 8∑j=5

mj a2j

M a2

+ $9

√GMa

(1−

√1− e2

)− Gm9

2π `

∫ 2π`

0

(1

|r− r9|− r · r9|r9|3

)∣∣∣∣φres

dλ9 (12)

on the admissible domain. Figure (7) shows the con-tours of the numerically averaged function (12) for the1:1, 3:2, 2:1 and 5:2 MMRs (recall that correspondingresonant phase-space portraits are shown in Figure 5).In addition to semi-analytic level curves of Hrs, depicted

7 We note that the resonant-secular diagrams depicted in Figure(7) strictly correspond to resonant orbits that encircle the ellipticequilibrium points in Figure (5). The comparatively less commonorbits that reside in the domain occupied by the∞-shaped separa-trix, are thus subject to a quantitatively different secular evolution.

with black lines and the background color-scale of theFigure, we have also over-plotted the e−∆$ evolutionsof the four particles emphasized in Figure (4) as orangecurves. Clearly, the agreement between semi-analytic re-sults and N -body simulations is satisfactory, and anymild quantitative discrepancies can likely be attributedto our assumption of null resonant libration amplitudein the perturbative calculation.

Taken together, these results yield the following in-sight into the dynamical evolution of distant Kuiper beltobjects induced by Planet Nine. First and foremost,long-term dynamical stability is facilitated by captureinto mean-motion resonances. Objects that are not (for-tuniously) scattered into mean motion commensurabil-ities with Planet Nine initially, are removed from thesystem by way of close encounters. Meanwhile, due tothe specific (“corotation”) nature of the resonant mul-tiplets that guide the resonant motion, the evolution ofdistant KBO eccentricities and longitudes of perihelionare dominated by secular dynamics that ensue inside res-onances. In turn, this separation between the degrees offreedom qualitatively explains why purely secular phase-space portraits shown in Figure (2) approximately matchthe results of large-scale numerical simulations.

4.3. Critical Semi-Major Axis

In light of the analysis presented above, it is evidentthat even though the purely secular treatment of dynam-ics outlined in section (2) does not formally account forthe full dynamical evolution observed within N -body cal-culations, it does provide a satisfactory approximationfor e−∆$ evolution (Beust 2016). Accordingly, we nowtake advantage of this simplified framework to explorethe dependence of the critical semi-major axis, acrit (be-yond which apsidal confinement ensues) on the parame-ters of Planet Nine.

As a proxy for acrit, we adopt the minimum value ofa at which the anti-aligned secular equilibrium exists onthe secular e − ∆$ diagram8. Practically, we calculate

this quantity by computing Hs as a function of e alongthe ∆$ = π line, gradually increasing a from 50 AU, andnoting the first instance where a local maximum appearsbetween e = 0 and e = 1. Correspondingly, this calcula-tion is carried out on a (a9, e9) grid for a given value ofm9.

We have computed acrit as a function of a9 and e9for m9 = 5m⊕, m9 = 10m⊕, and m9 = 20m⊕. Fig-ure (8) depicts curves corresponding to acrit = 150 AU,acrit = 200 AU, and acrit = 250 AU for these choices ofm9. As can be clearly seen in this figure, acrit exhibitsa rather mild dependence of m9, and follows a shallowrelationship between e9 and a9.

It is important to note that observationally, the spe-cific value of acrit is not unequivocally determined. Itis indeed possible to demonstrate that the clustering oforbits with a & 250 AU in their respective longitudes ofperihelion ($) is statistically significant (Brown 2017).However, given that the confinement in the argument ofperihelion (ω) may persist down to a ∼ 150 AU (Tru-jillo & Sheppard 2014), it is possible that anti-aligned

8 For our nominal parameters (i.e. a9 = 700 AU, e9 = 0.6,m9 = 10m⊕), this proxy yields acrit ≈ 200 AU, in good agreementwith simulations.

11

300 400 500 600 700 800 900

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

acrit= 150

AU

acrit= 250

AUacrit= 200

AU

a9 (AU)

e9

m9 = 10mm9 = 20m

m9 = 5m

Fig. 8.— Critical semi-major axis corresponding to a transitionfrom randomized to apsidally clustered regime of KBO dynamics.In light of the observational ambiguity related to the specific valueof acrit, here we show contours corresponding to acrit = 100, 150,and 250 AU as functions of a9, and e9, for m9 = 5 (green), 10(blue), and 20m⊕ (red). The calculation is carried out in thesecular approximation, and assumes that Planet Nine’s inclinationis not sufficiently large to alter the e−∆$ dynamics appreciably.

dynamics in fact ensues beyond a > 150 AU, and the ob-served $ distribution in the 150 < a < 250 AU range iscontaminated by metastable objects residing within theapsidally aligned regions of the e−∆$ diagram. Whileperfectly plausible, this scenario is not as strongly sup-ported in a raw statistical sense by the current dataset(Brown 2017; Shankman et al. 2017), leaving some am-biguity as to where in the 150 < a < 250 AU interval thetrue value of acrit resides.

Whatever the exact value of acrit may be, it is worthnoting that P9 parameters within N -body simulationsthat were found to match the observational data withcomparatively high probability by Brown & Batygin(2016) all lie between the acrit = 150 AU and acrit =250 AU contours in Figure (8). In other words, thesecontours delineate a region of orbital element space thatyields simulation results that compare well with the realsolar system. At the same time, the semi-analytic calcu-lations presented herein do not suffer from limitations inresolution (i.e. particle count) inherent to numerical ex-periments, and therefore likely inform a broader range ofacceptable P9 parameters than was reported in Brown &Batygin (2016). Exploring this parameter range with anexpanded suite of high-resolution (N 5000) N -bodysimulations constitutes an appealing avenue for futuredevelopment of the Planet Nine hypothesis.

5. SPATIAL DYNAMICS

Up until this point, we have considered the orbital evo-lution induced upon the Kuiper belt by Planet Nine, un-der the strict assumption of coplanarity. As already dis-cussed above, this assumption leads to somewhat ideal-ized behavior, and fails to capture three important as-pects of the dynamics that emerge within the frameworkof full-fledged N -body simulations. First, rather than ex-hibiting stable resonance capture and remaining lockedto a particular commensurability for the duration of thesolar system’s lifetime, real Kuiper belt objects expe-rience chaotic semi-major axis evolution, and thereforeexplore a wide range of orbital period ratios with PlanetNine (this is evident, for example, in Figure 11 of Mill-

holland & Laughlin 2017). Second, in addition to con-finement in the longitude of perihelion, real long-periodKBOs exhibit a clustering in the longitude of ascend-ing node as well, which jointly leads a clustering in theargument of perihelion, ω = $−Ω. Third, N -body sim-ulations of Batygin & Brown (2016a) show that Kuiperbelt objects initially residing close to P9’s orbital planecan occasionally undergo high-amplitude oscillations ofthe inclination, leading to generation of retrograde KBOs(Batygin & Brown 2016b). Accordingly, the goal of thissection is to characterize these features qualitatively.

5.1. The Anti-Aligned Population

To carry out the exploration of non-planar dynam-ics within the framework of our simplified model, werepeated the numerical experiment with a9 = 700 AUdescribed in section 3, allowing for a small inclinationdispersion among the particles. In particular, initial par-ticle inclinations were drawn from a half-normal distri-bution with a standard deviation of σi = 5 deg, whilelongitudes of ascending node Ω were assumed to be uni-formly distributed between 0 and 360 deg. As before,the simulations are performed in a frame coplanar withthe orbit of Planet Nine (meaning that i9 = 0), andthe Keplerian motion of the four inner giants is averagedout. Meanwhile, the ecliptic plane is envisioned to be in-clined with respect to the orbit of P9 by a small amount(e.g. 10− 20 deg), although the corresponding reductionin the effective magnitude of the J2 moment (equation3) is ignored. Remarkably, this simple modification tothe physical setup of the problem is sufficient to approxi-mately recover the full breadth of the dynamical behaviorobserved within more detailed numerical experiments.

Figure (9) shows the orbital evolution of six (uniquelycolored) representative objects, whose orbits remainroughly confined to the orbital plane of Planet Nine.The top panel depicts the longitude of perihelion (rel-ative to the apsidal line of Planet Nine) as a function ofsemi-major axis. Clearly, allowing the KBOs to possesseven a small inclination breaks the immutability of meanmotion resonances seen in the strictly coplanar model,and renders the evolution of the semi-major axes chaotic.At the same time, the clustering of the orbits in longi-tude of perihelion persists in spite of irregular semi-majoraxis evolution, and indeed, the secular portrait of orbitaleccentricity depicted in the middle panel of the Figureagrees well with the resonant-secular e − ∆$ diagramsshown in Figure (7).

We note that although the introduction of a finite in-clination dispersion is sufficient to drive chaotic mix-ing in the semi-major axis, its efficiency is underesti-mated in our simplified model, since stochastic evolutionis driven solely by P9 resonances. In reality, scatteringfacilitated by Neptune significantly enhances the rate ofsemi-major axis diffusion (particularly during the low-perihelion phases of the secular cycle), and modifies theobserved behavior on a quantitative level. As a conse-quence, the results obtained in our semi-averaged simu-lations depict a somewhat idealized realization of distantKuiper belt evolution.

The apsidally clustered resonance-hopping behaviorobserved in Figure (9) can be qualitatively understoodwithin the framework of the semi-analytical theory de-scribed above. The introduction of a new (i−Ω) degree

12

of freedom into the dynamics implies that rather thanbeing forced by a single secular harmonic, the modula-tion of the a − φres phase-space portrait is now drivenby two separate angles. This modulation transforms thecollision loci depicted in Figure (7) into fuzzy chaoticbands because any given point (e,∆$) near the originalcollision locus may or may not lead to a collision, de-pending on the values of i and Ω. To this end, noticethat in Figure (7), the curves showing the secular evo-lution are essentially tangent to the collision loci, whichmeans that in a strictly planar physical setup, secularevolution almost never leads to close encounters betweenthe particles and Planet Nine (i.e. most of the plot-ted trajectories don’t intersect the collision loci). On theother hand, if the collision locus becomes a chaotic band,many more secular trajectories can infiltrate this irregu-lar region, and with appropriate values of i and Ω, closeencounters can ensue. When this happens, the particleenters a stochastic dynamical regime and hops in semimajor axis, until it locks into a new resonance and thesecular dynamics drives it away from the collision locusof the new resonance. Importantly, this type of behavioris observed in numerical integrations of real objects un-der the influence of Planet Nine (Millholland & Laughlin2017; Becker et al. 2017).

When an object gets fortuitously trapped in some res-onance (by entering it through the chaotic layer that sur-rounds the collision curves), its orbital evolution can betemporarily stabilized by the secular evolution in e and∆$. In other words, test-particles have the tendencyto exhibit prolonged periods of resonance locking (ontimescales similar to the secular libration period) beforebreaking out, and jumping to another commensurabil-ity. In fact, looking again at Figure (7) and imagining achaotic band near each depicted collision locus, it is ev-ident that the (e,∆$) evolution can drive a body awayfrom the band at the peaks of the eccentricity cycle ofthe 3:2, 5:3 and 2:1 resonances (and also at the bottomof the eccentricity cycle in the 2:1 resonance). Duringthis secular phase, close encounters between the parti-cles and Planet Nine are no longer possible. However,as the eccentricity-perihelion cycle unfolds, the particlemust eventually plunge back into the chaotic band. Theobject can thus experience new close encounters withPlanet Nine, and hop to another resonance where thisprocess repeats. In reality, this sequence of events isfurther complicated by the fact that at the peak of theeccentricity cycle, objects are brought to an orbital statewhere q ∼ a8 and suffer enhanced semi-major axis dif-fusion due to scattering off of Neptune (or equivalently,overlap with Neptune’s exterior mean motion resonances;Gomes et al. 2008). As a result, it is reasonable to as-sert that only dynamically “detached” objects that arenot actively scattering off of Neptune, are presently en-trained in mean motion resonances with Planet Nine.

The dynamical evolution of the orbital inclination ob-served in the bottom panel of Figure (9) is a consequenceof the chaotic rotation of the angular momentum vectorsaround Planet Nine’s orbit normal. That is, their lon-gitudes of ascending node relative to the orbital planeof Planet Nine are in circulation. However, if the incli-nation of P9 is sufficiently large relative to the ecliptic,then particles that are less inclined with respect to PlanetNine’s plane than the inclination of P9 itself, will appear

0.25

0.5

90

180

270

1

360

0200 300 400 500 600 700

a (AU)

$

(deg)

0.75

00 90 180 270 360

$ (deg)

e

0 1 2 3 4

10

0

20

30

40

time (Gyr)

i(d

eg)

chaotic semi-major axis diffusion

apsidal confinement

chaotic inclination dynamics

Fig. 9.— Dynamical evolution exhibited by apsidally confinedobjects that do not experience large-amplitude inclination oscilla-tions. The top panel shows the chaotic footprint outlined by sixuniquely colored particles in ∆$−a space, and elucidates the factthat a small inclination dispersion renders the semi-major axis evo-lution of distant Kuiper belt objects stochastic. Each vertical seg-ment, however, traces out long-term trapping of particles in meanmotion resonances. The middle panel displays e −∆$ dynamics,demonstrating that secular evolution experienced by the particlesretains its apsidally clustered character, despite chaotic variationsof the semi-major axes, except when a approaches acrit. The bot-tom panel depicts chaotic evolution of orbital inclinations. In areference frame that coincides with Planet Nine’s orbit, the angu-lar momentum vectors of distant KBOs chaotically rotate aroundthe orbit normal. Viewed from the ecliptic plane, however, circu-lation of distant object around Planet Nine’s mildly inclined planewill yield an apparent clustering of the longitudes of ascendingnode.

to have a librating node relative to the ecliptic. In otherwords, viewed from a coordinate system that coincideswith the ecliptic plane, the orbits of these particles ex-

13

ecute a libration around the forced i − ∆Ω equilibriumforced by P9’s inclination.

Taken together, our calculations suggest that the clus-tering of the longitudes of ascending node first noted inBatygin & Brown (2016a) is nothing but a trivial con-sequence of the bending of the Laplace plane away fromthe solar system’s mean plane by Planet Nine. Moreover,the apparent libration of the ascending node Ω, togetherwith the true libration of longitude of perihelion $, pro-duces the apparent libration of the argument of perihe-lion ω, as observed in the real data (Trujillo & Sheppard2014). This implies that the orbital inclination of PlanetNine must simultaneously be sufficiently large for appar-ent nodal clustering to ensue (e.g. i9 & 10− 20 deg), butnot be so large as to disrupt the stable confinement of thelongitudes of perihelion (i9 . 40 deg; Brown & Batygin2016; Saillenfest et al. 2017).

5.2. The Highly-Inclined Population

Perhaps the most remarkable consequence of P9-driven dynamics is exemplified by the induction of large-amplitude oscillations in the orbital inclinations of dis-tant KBOs. Not only is this mode of orbital evolution aunique prediction of the Planet Nine hypothesis (Baty-gin & Brown 2016a), real objects presently entrained inthis pattern of perturbation now comprise a firmly es-tablished part of the observational dataset (Gomes et al.2015). Accordingly, this regime of P9-induced dynamicsconstitutes one of the strongest lines of evidence for theexistence of Planet Nine, as no other dynamical modelcan reasonably account for the origin of the observedhighly inclined TNO population. Let us now examinethese extreme orbital excursions within the frameworkof our simplified numerical model.

The top panel of Figure (10) shows the inclination timeseries of six simulated particles with initial semi-majoraxes between 500 AU and 600 AU that do not remainbound to Planet Nine’s orbital plane for the entire dura-tion of the integration. As can be readily seen in this Fig-ure, during the latter half of the solar system’s lifetime,each object abruptly enters a phase of extreme orbitalvariation, and upon experiencing a single large-scale os-cillation of the inclination rejoins the low-i populationof apsidally anti-aligned bodies. While representative,we note that orbital excursions of this sort are not al-ways limited to a single cycle - some objects within thesimulation suite experience a multitude of sequential os-cillations. Moreover, the onset of high-i excursions is notlimited to a small subset of particles - in our simulation,38% of all stable objects experience at least one suchexcursion.

An intriguing feature of the depicted evolution is thatthe pattern of e−∆$ dynamics changes drastically whena particle enters the highly inclined regime. As shown onthe middle panel of Figure (10), rather than encirclingan elliptic equilibrium located at ∆$ = 180 deg as inFigure (9), the e − ∆$ projection of the phase-spaceportrait acquires a three-lobed shape with eccentricitymaxima located ∼ ±70 deg away from perfect apsidalanti-alignment with Planet Nine. The corresponding in-stants where the eccentricities are maximized (and per-ihelion distance is minimized) are shown with points onthe top panel of Figure (10), and lie almost exactly ati ≈ 90 deg.

Taken together, the top and middle panels of Fig-ure (10) show that the model predicts the highly in-clined population to be most readily observable in astate that is approximately perpendicular to the eclip-tic, and is slightly sub-orthogonal in apsidal orientationwith respect to the anti-aligned cluster of distant orbits.Note however, that during phases of lower eccentricities(and higher perihelion distance), this population remainsrelatively well localized in the longitude of perihelion9

around ∆$ = 180 deg. This means that Kuiper beltorbits that lie beyond the current observational frontierexhibit an even more complex dynamical structure thanthose comprising the known long-period dataset.

While it is tempting to attribute the mode of orbitalevolution shown in Figure (10) to the oft-cited Kozai-Lidov (KL) resonance (Lidov 1962; Kozai 1962), it iscrucial to understand that the flavor of secular dynam-ics executed by the simulated particles is keenly distinct.Specifically, in contrast with conventional KL evolution(where orbital inclination is traded for eccentricity suchthat the particle’s eccentricity is minimized when or-bits become orthogonal), the simulated particles reachtheir peak eccentricities near i ≈ 90 deg. Moreover, in-stead of being constrained by the conservation of thez−component of the specific angular momentum vectorh =√

1− e2 cos(i) (Kinoshita & Nakai 1999), the orbitalexcursions observed in our simulation are accompaniedby large-amplitude variations of this quantity (rangingfrom ∼ 1 to -1). This further implies that the KL res-onance does not represent the primary driver of the de-picted evolution.

Because the orbit of Planet Nine is assumed to havei9 = 0 in our calculations, the only angles that appearin the secular Hamiltonian are ∆$, ω, and their vari-ous linear combinations. We have already argued abovethat the KL mechanism is not responsible for the ob-served evolution, so libration of ω alone cannot facilitatethe observed dynamics10. Simultaneously, ∆$ cannotforce oscillations in inclination, meaning that the secularresonance at play must contain both ∆$ and ω. Corre-spondingly, we propose that large-scale orbital variationsdepicted in Figure (10) are driven by libration of the sec-ular angle

θ = ∆$ − 2ω = 2Ω−$ −$9. (13)

Incidentally, this angle arises at the octopole order ofexpansion when the Hamiltonian is expressed as series insemi-major axis ratios (Mardling 2010).

Adopting ∆γ = −∆$ and θ as the secular angles ofthe test particles, we identify the quantity

Θ =

√1− e2

2(1− cos i) (14)

as the action conjugate to θ. In the bottom panel of Fig-ure (10), we show the evolution of canonical cartesian co-ordinates related to (θ,Θ) action-angle variables. Fromthis figure, it is evident that during the high-inclination

9 Recall that the longitude of perihelion is a dog-leg angle, andfor highly inclined orbits does not generally represent a good proxyfor the azimuthal angle of the Runge-Lenz vector.

10 Recall that the critical angle associated with the KL resonanceis 2ω (Kinoshita & Nakai 1999).

14

0

-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1

entrainment into a high- order secular resonance

0 1 2 3 4

45

0

90

135

180

time (Gyr)

i(d

eg) max eccentricity

(points)

0.25

0.5

1

0.75

00 90 180 270 360

$ (deg)

e

apsidal confinement

0.5

-0.5

1

-1

p2 cos

p2

sin

Fig. 10.— Dynamical evolution exhibited by simulated particlesthat experience orbital flips. The top panel shows the inclinationtime series of six uniquely colored test particles that exhibit large-amplitude orbital excursions and temporarily achieve retrogradeorbits. As the large-scale variations of inclination ensue, e − ∆$projection of the dynamics acquires a distinct three-lobed shape,which is characterized by eccentricity maxima that are approxi-mately 70 deg away from ∆$ = 180 deg, and are achieved wheni ≈ 90 deg. In contrast with Kozai-Lidov dynamics, the depictedevolution is characterized by simultaneous libration of the criticalangles θ and ∆$ (as shown on the bottom panel), and constitutesan exceedingly strong form of secular coupling.

phase of orbital evolution, θ executes a bounded oscilla-tion and the secular trajectory traces out the shape of atypical resonant separatrix (Henrard & Lamaitre 1983).Thus, the dynamics shown in Figure (10) is characterizedby the simultaneous libration of the relative longitude ofperihelion ∆$, as well as the angle θ (which jointly leadsto the libration of the longitude of ascending node) repre-senting an exceptionally strong form of secular coupling.

Due to the lack of separation of timescales on which thetwo secular degrees of freedom operate, we cannot studythe depicted large-amplitude variations of inclination us-ing the same flavor of semi-analytic perturbation theoryas that outlined in section 4. Nevertheless, we note thatthe onset of these large-scale oscillations almost alwayscorresponds to the eccentricity minimum in the e−∆$cycle that precedes the oscillation. Qualitatively, this im-plies that resonant-secular e−∆$ dynamics modulatesthe proximity parameter of the secular θ −Θ resonance,such that when e approaches a critical value, a dynam-ical gateway towards capture of low-inclination objectsinto the secular resonance characterized by libration ofθ temporarily opens. Accordingly, the coercion of low-iobjects onto trajectories that experience large-amplitudeoscillations of inclination is a fundamentally stochasticprocess. In turn, this means that some of the currentlyobserved members of the apsidally clustered populationcan in principle join the highly inclined population in thefuture, and visa-verse.

6. COMPARISON WITH OBSERVATIONS

Given that our spatial model reproduces the key fea-tures of more detailed numerical simulations, it warrantsa rudimentary comparison with the observational data inlight of the semi-analytical insight into the governing dy-namics developed above. Because we are neither resolv-ing the Keplerian motion of the canonical giant planets,nor their inclination with respect to Planet Nine, herewe will not consider the clustering of the longitudes ofascending node at low i. Instead, we will focus exclu-sively on the confinement of the longitude of perihelionas well as the behavior of the highly inclined long-periodobjects.

As shown in Figure (1), there are currently ten knownobjects with a > 250 AU (shown in purple) that com-prise the primary $ cluster. The observational datasetalso shows the existence of two objects that are diamet-rically opposed to the mean orientation of this cluster(shown in green), as well as a single outlier, 2015 GT50

(shown in gray), that does not fall within either the apsi-dally aligned or anti-aligned sub-populations of objects.In order to meaningfully compare the expectations of themodel with the data, we extended our integrations suchthat the initial semi-major axis distribution of the parti-cle disk stretches out to 850 AU.

The orbital footprint of all simulated long-term stableand metastable particles is shown in Figure (11), wherethe top panel depicts longitude of perihelion as a functionof the semi-major axis (as in the top panel of Figure 9).Meanwhile, the middle panel shows the orbital inclina-tion as a function of the argument of perihelion and thebottom panel elucidates the the action Θ as a functionof its conjugate angle, θ. As a crude proxy for observ-ability, we adopt simple cuts of the numerical output atq 6 100 AU and i 6 40 deg. Points corresponding tobodies with dynamical lifetimes in excess of 4 Gyr thatdo not simultaneously satisfy these criteria are shownin gray, while those that do are shown in blue or red,depending on their inclination evolution. In particular,objects that remain confined to the plane of Planet Ninethroughout the integration are shown in blue. On theother hand, bodies that experience large-amplitude in-clination oscillations at any point in their evolution are

15

depicted in red.In agreement with the results of Batygin & Brown

(2016a), the top panel of Figure (11) shows the emer-gence of a well-defined cluster of apsidally anti-alignedorbits that are contaminated by trajectories that circu-late in the longitude of perihelion. One striking exampleof such a circulating trajectory is shown as a vertical blueline with a semi-major axis of a ≈ 335 AU. As discussedin sections 3 and 4, the dynamics of apsidally confinedtrajectories are driven by the resonant harmonic φres (seeequation 4), while the comparatively less frequent apsi-dally circulating trajectories tend to reside within reso-nant multiplets characterized by low-amplitude librationof other resonant angles that contain the particle’s longi-tude of perihelion, $. The aforementioned observationaldata are over-plotted on this panel, and are color-codedin the same way as in Figure (1).

As expected, all observed KBOs that comprise the pri-mary cluster (shown in purple) are seamlessly explainedby the simulation results. More remarkably, however, theoutlier within the data (shown in gray) is also naturallyreproduced by the model, as an object that belongs tothe class of observable stable particles that exhibit apsi-dal circulation, i.e. those entrained in resonances char-acterized by angles that contain $ (see appendix for ananalysis). In the present example, this agreement stemsfrom the fact the observed object is very close to the 3:1resonance with Planet Nine. While this correspondencemay be purely accidental, it emphasizes that the mere ex-istence of a small number of apsidally unconfined objectsthat do follow the overall pattern exhibited by the data,does not constitute strong evidence against the PlanetNine hypothesis.

Although a similar narrative could in principle be in-voked for the two objects that are the apsidally alignedwith Planet Nine (shown in green), it can be more rea-sonably speculated that these bodies are in fact subjectto purely secular interactions with P9. Recall from sec-tion 2 (Figure 2) that apsidally aligned objects residingin the secular domain are protected from close encountersby the geometric co-linearity of the orbits. Correspond-ingly, objects that never attain low perihelion distancesat the top of their eccentricity cycle and are thereforeclose to the secular equilibrium point, exhibit long-termstable apsidal libration about ∆$ = 0. Conversely ap-sidally aligned objects with low perihelion distances aremetastable, as they only begin to scatter off of PlanetNine once they precess onto their respective tangentialcollision curves, yielding dynamical lifetimes that are onthe order of (a fraction of) the precession timescale - i.e.,∼ few× 100 Myr.

Because in our numerical experiments we restricted theinitial perihelion range of all particles to q ∈ (30, 36) AU,our simulations do not produce any long-term stableapsidally aligned orbits. Instead, secular dynamics ob-served within our N -body simulations are dominated bythe metastable particles that originate at high eccentric-ity and eventually precess towards the tangential config-uration, where they are scattered out. To demonstratethe apsidal behavior of this sub-population of orbits, ob-jects with dynamical lifetimes between 100 and 500 Myrare shown as orange dots in Figure (11). These particlesclearly cluster around ∆$ = 0, and provide an excellentmatch to the aligned (green) data points shown in the

(deg)

90

180

270

360

0300 400 500 600 700 800

a (AU)

$

(deg

)

! (deg)

45

0

90

135

180

i(d

eg)

0 90 180 270 360

2015 GT50

2014 FE72

2015 KG163

2013 SY99

6.1 AU

14.6 AU

8.4 AU16.8 AU

9.4 AU

11 AU

periheliondistance

met

asta

ble

stab

lem

etas

tabl

e

0 90 180 270 3600

0.8

1

0.6

0.4

0.2

retro

grad

elo

w i

/ hig

h e

433 AU 1599 AU

1079 AU

268 AU309 AU

355 AU

semi-major axis

Fig. 11.— Comparison between the results of our N -body simu-lation with a9 = 700 AU, e9 = 0.6, m9 = 10m⊕ and the observa-tional data. The top panel shows the chaotic ∆$−a footprint out-lined by dynamically long-lived and metastable particles within thesimulation. Evolution of long-term stable low-i objects is displayedwith blue dots when they satisfy our crude observability criteria,and with gray dots when they attain q > 100 AU or i > 40 deg.Similarly, objects that do experience large-scale inclination cyclesare shown with red dots when visible and with gray dots otherwise.Meanwhile, the orbital footprint of metastable objects with dynam-ical lifetimes between 100 and 500 Myr are shown with orange dots.The current observational census of distant Kuiper belt objects isover-plotted on the panel, and is color-coded in the same way as inFigure (1). Note that 2014 FE72 has a semi-major axis of 1923 AU,and is shown on the figure for completeness. The middle panel de-picts the orbital inclination of simulated particles as a function oftheir argument of perihelion, while the bottom panel projects thesame trajectories onto a plane defined by the action-angle coor-dinates Θ and θ. Six currently known long-period centaurs areover-plotted on the figure as yellow points, and their periheliondistances and semi-major axes are labeled.

Figure.Naturally, this explanation would not be sensible if the

16

entire distant Kuiper belt had been generated ∼ 4 Gyrago and never replenished since then. This is how-ever not the case in the real solar system: just as thehighly-inclined long-period KBOs are routinely scatteredinwards to create the population of retrograde bodieswith a < 100 AU (Batygin & Brown 2016b), scattereddisk objects with a < 250 AU are continuously scat-tered outward by Neptune, resupplying the distant trans-Neptunian region with metastable KBOs (Gomes et al.2008). Thus, our model points to the possibility that2013 FT28 and 2015 KG163 are relative newcomers to thedistant Kuiper belt, and will eventually be destabilizedby short-periodic interactions with Planet Nine.

There exists yet another interpretation of the apsi-dally aligned data points as well, which is not well rep-resented by Figure (11) due to our choice of low-q ini-tial conditions. Particularly, rather than belonging tothe aforementioned metastable sub-population of bodiesthat experience pure secular evolution, 2013 FT28 and2015 KG163 could be entrained in the stable secular li-bration island around ∆$ = 0, and are presently ob-served near the peak of their respective eccentricity cy-cles. In order to unequivocally distinguish between thesetwo interpretations, we would need to know the exactorbital parameters of Planet Nine. However, we simul-taneously note that within the context of the long-termstable interpretation, some additional mechanism otherthan scattering off of Neptune (such as say, interactionswith the birth cluster; Morbidelli & Levison 2004; Adams2010) would likely be required to initially raise the peri-helion distances of these objects and lock them into theapsidally aligned secular libration island. This is becausebodies scattered to distant elliptic orbits by the tradi-tional giant planets would necessarily have low perihelia(like the initial conditions of our simulation) and there-fore could not reside within the stable libration island.

The yellow data points shown on the middle and bot-tom panels of Figure (11) represent the population of dis-tant (a > 250 AU), highly inclined (i > 40 deg) objectswith q < 30 AU discussed in section 5.2. Although theseobjects conform to the dynamical streamlines traced outby the simulated particles relatively well, it is importantto keep in mind that (by virtue of having q < 30 AU)these bodies have eccentricities that are much closer tounity than any of the particles in our simulations. Thismeans that the observed objects are drawn from the ex-treme end of the broader high-i population, and havelikely had their orbits somewhat perturbed by the canon-ical giant planets. As a result, we expect that the agree-ment between theory and observations will be even betterfor (yet-undiscovered) highly inclined long-period KBOswith q > 30 AU. Certainly, continued observational mon-itoring of the distant Kuiper belt outside of the eclipticplane constitutes a viable avenue towards further charac-terization of long-term dynamical evolution induced byPlanet Nine.

As a final point, it is instructive to remark on theextent to which the calculations described above are inagreement with more detailed simulations that fully re-solve the orbital motion of the inner giants. In particular,the top panel of Figure (11) can be readily compared withFigures (5) and (8) of Batygin & Brown (2016a), whichdepict simulations with very similar initial conditions tothat considered herein. As expected, upon comparison

of these numerical experiments we find that the generalsurvival rate of particles is somewhat lower in simula-tions that model Neptune directly. Specifically, in oursemi-averaged calculations, 19% of particles initializedbetween 250 AU and 550 AU remain stable over 4Gyr,while only 7% of objects in this initial semi-major axisand perihelion range survive the full integration span ina simulation where Neptune is modeled directly. Thisnumber increases slightly to 10% when Planet Nine isendowed with a i9 = 30 deg inclination with respect tothe inner solar system.

Another notable difference between direct and semi-averaged calculations lies in that simulated objects thatcirculate in perihelion and match our observability crite-ria are somewhat less prevalent in the simulations thatinclude Neptune’s short-periodic perturbations. This islikely because apsidally circulating particles tend to ex-perience diminished eccentricity variations (see appendixfor details), and thus retain low perihelion distances,where they are more likely to be removed by Neptune.Simultaneously, we note that for the exact same reason,such objects are more readily discoverable by astronom-ical surveys, and are thus bound to be over-representedwithin the observational census of long-period KBOs.Accordingly, further characterization of P9-sculpted or-bital distribution, fully accounting for the overlaying ob-servational biases using high-resolution numerical exper-iments constitutes an important step towards contin-ued evaluation of the Planet Nine hypothesis within theframework of the emergent dataset.

7. DISCUSSION

Within the current observational census of trans-Neptunian objects, the longest-period orbits exhibit un-expected collective structure that is most readily at-tributed to gravitational perturbations induced by a yet-unseen, massive planet. While numerical simulationsaimed at reproducing the Kuiper belt’s orbital makeupthrough gravitational interactions with Planet Nine arenow plentiful in the literature (Batygin & Brown 2016a;Brown & Batygin 2016; Millholland & Laughlin 2017;Becker et al. 2017), the physics of the dynamical pro-cesses responsible for shaping the distant Kuiper beltremains largely unclear (Beust 2016). In this work, wehave sought to resolve this problem, and characterize thedynamical evolution induced by Planet Nine upon long-period Kuiper belt objects, from semi-analytic grounds.

The specific aim of this work has been to qualitativelyunderstand the three primary lines of evidence for theexistence of Planet Nine. They are: (i) orbital clusteringof long-period Kuiper belt objects, (ii) dynamical detach-ment of KBO orbits from Neptune, and (iii) generationof highly inclined/retrograde bodies within the solar sys-tem. We note that none of these effects are new, andhave already been pointed out in the work of (Batygin& Brown 2016a). Accordingly, the primary purpose ofthis study has been to create an analytical guide for theinterpretation of existing and future numerical results,rather than to generate new ones. In doing so, we havebeen guided by a series of queries that we outlined in theintroduction. Let us now recall, and provide the answersto these questions.

• What role (if any) do resonant interactions play

17

within the dynamical evolution induced by PlanetNine? If resonances are prevalent, what or-der/multiplet harmonics dominate the dynamics,and what are their characteristic widths?

In the most idealized case of strictly planar physicalsetup, all high-eccentricity particles that occupy stableorbits within Planet Nine’s gravitational domain of influ-ence derive their prolonged dynamical lifetimes from thephase-protection mechanism inherent to mean-motionresonances11. The critical angles associated with theseresonances typically have the form φres = k λ9−` λ−(k−`)$9, and due to the absence of $ (i.e., longitude of peri-helion of the KBO) from the expression, these harmonicsonly modulate the mean anomalies and semi-major axesof the KBOs12. The most prevalent interior resonancesthat arise in our calculations correspond to the 1:1, 3:2,2:1 and 5:2 period ratios, with secondary contributionsfrom the 5:4, 4:3, 5:3, and 3:1 commensurabilities. Pro-vided nominal Planet Nine parameters, the widths ofthese resonances lie on the order of δa ∼ 2 − 15 AU,

and scale as δa ∝ m1/29 (Henrard & Lamaitre 1983).

If the strict coplanarity restriction is lifted, and theparticles are endowed with a small inclination dispersionrelative to the plane of Planet Nine’s orbit (as in the realKuiper belt), a large portion of resonant dynamics be-come chaotic, and facilitate an essentially diffusive semi-major axis evolution, with particles hopping from oneresonance to another. Moreover, for high eccentricity or-bits that reach q . 36 AU, stochastic semi-major axistransport is further enhanced by gravitational scatteringoff of Neptune (Gomes et al. 2008). These complica-tions imply that only dynamically detached objects withq & 40 AU can reasonably be speculated to currentlyreside in mean-motion resonances with Planet Nine, andany attempt to calculate the present-day semi-major axisof Planet Nine exclusively from resonant relationshipswith the observed KBOs (Malhotra et al. 2016) may bespoiled by the chaotic nature of the underlying dynamics.

• What role (if any) do secular interactions playwithin the dynamical evolution induced by PlanetNine? If dominant, how are close encountersavoided on co-planar, anti-aligned orbits? More-over, if resonant interactions are relevant to thePlanet Nine hypothesis, why does the purely sec-ular phase-space portrait provide a good match tothe results of numerical simulations?

While mean-motion resonances stabilize the orbitsagainst close-encounters, they do little to modulate theeccentricities and longitudes of perihelia of the affectedbodies. As a result, the e−∆$ dynamics induced upondistant KBOs by Planet Nine is largely secular. This ex-plains why the doubly averaged treatment of the dynam-ics outlined in section 2 provides a good approximationto the results of numerical simulations discussed in sec-tion 3 (Beust 2016). At the same time, it is important

11 Recall from section 2 that stable orbits outside MMRs alsoexist, and avoid close encounters with P9 via low-amplitude apsidallibration around ∆$ = 0. Such orbits, however, never reach lowvalues of q and are therefore difficult to detect.

12 This is evident from simple application of Hamilton’s equa-tions to the disturbing potential.

to keep in mind that the true resonant-secular evolutionfacilitated by Planet Nine’s mean gravitational potentialis subtly different from the purely secular limit, since theorbital averaging process itself is subject to the resonantrelationship among the orbital phases of the bodies. Thedelicate differences between purely secular and resonant-secular dynamics induced by Planet Nine can be notedby comparing Figures (2) and (7).

The eccentricity-perihelion projection of the resonant-secular phase-space portraits outlined in Figure (7) fur-ther shows that apsidal clustering of distant KBOs andthe detachment of perihelion from Neptune’s orbit exem-plified by objects such as Sedna and 2012 VP113 (Brownet al. 2004; Trujillo & Sheppard 2014) are actually thesame physical effect. That is, as the orbits of KBOsevolve along the level curves of the resonant-secularHamiltonian, they are forced to encircle a stable equi-librium that resides at ∆$ = 180 deg. Thus, librationof a Kuiper belt object’s longitude of perihelion aroundthe apsidally anti-aligned configuration with respect toPlanet Nine is accompanied by conjugate oscillations ofthe eccentricity that periodically detach (and reattach)the perihelion from (to) Neptune.

While the gravitational influence of P9 alone provides aperfectly adequate mechanism for perihelion detachmentof long-period objects, we cannot exclude the possibilitythat KBOs were additionally affected by other dynami-cal processes (such as interactions with the birth cluster;Morbidelli & Levison 2004) during the solar system’s in-fancy. If so, some fraction of the distant clustered pop-ulation may occupy secular cycles that will never bringtheir perihelia sufficiently close to the orbit of Neptunefor scattering to ensue. In either case, our calculationsreveal that the maximal width of the perihelion clusteris limited to |∆$ − 180 deg | . 90 deg - a restriction fa-cilitated by both the character of the dynamics itself, aswell as the collision locus that limits the domain whereclose encounters can be avoided on the e − ∆$ plane.Within this framework, Planet Nine’s mass merely reg-ulates the size of the chaotic layer, and the timescale onwhich perihelion cluster get sculpted.

• What parameters determine the critical semi-majoraxis corresponding to the transition between ran-domized and clustered longitudes of perihelion?What physical effect controls this transition?

Given that the long-term dynamics induced uponKBOs by Planet Nine are essentially secular in nature,the critical semi-major axis beyond which orbital clus-tering ensues corresponds to a point where quadrupolartorques induced by Planet Nine begin to dominate overthose arising from the canonical giant planets. Com-puted in this framework, curves corresponding to criticalsemi-major axes of acrit = 150, 200 and 250 AU are delin-eated in e9−a9 space for m9 = 5, 10, and 20m⊕ in Figure(8). While these loci provide an approximate measure ofacrit, we note that the transition between apsidally con-fined and randomized orbits in our N -body simulationsis somewhat gradual (as shown in Figure 3).

With decreasing semi-major axis, the relative numberof resonant bodies that are apsidally clustered decreaseswith respect to those that are not13. This means that

13 In our coplanar calculations, this transition also corresponds

18

although acrit provides a characteristic semi-major axisthat corresponds to the onset of orbital clustering, thereal Kuiper belt at a . acrit will show orbital cluster-ing that is increasingly contaminated by non-anti-alignedbodies - an effect seen in the real data (Trujillo & Shep-pard 2014; Shankman et al. 2017). Meanwhile, our cal-culations suggest that clustering of the orbital planes ofdistant KBOs and the corresponding nodal confinementis a simple consequence of the tilting of the Laplace planeaway from the ecliptic by Planet Nine.

• What is the qualitative behavior of inclination dy-namics within the framework of P9-driven evolu-tion? What dynamical process allows some of theobjects to acquire exceptionally high inclinationsin the distant Kuiper belt?

Not all objects affected by Planet Nine remain con-fined to the Laplace plane on multi-Gyr timescales. In-stead, a subset of long-period KBOs execute large-scaleoscillations in the orbital inclination as well as eccentric-ity. This mode of P9-induced evolution is distinct fromthe Kozai-Lidov mechanism, and is driven by a high-order secular resonance that is characterized by simul-taneous libration of the critical angle θ = ∆$ − 2ω aswell as ∆$. This doubly-resonant form of secular cou-pling forces a particular strenuous exchange of angularmomentum, and generally leads to acute orbit-flippingbehavior of distant KBOs (Li et al. 2014).

The onset of these large-amplitude orbital excursionis fundamentally chaotic, and is facilitated by variationsin the the angular momentum deficit that is driven byresonant-secular e−∆$ oscillations. That is, oscillationsin the eccentricity modulate the system’s proximity tothe θ−resonance, periodically allowing low-inclinationorbits to enter the highly inclined dynamical regime. Asthe subsequent orbital evolution unfolds, the eccentricityreaches a peak of its cycle when inclination is approxi-mately i ≈ 90 deg, meaning that bodies belonging to thehighly inclined population are most readily observablein a state roughly perpendicular to the plane of thesolar system. This qualitatively explains the observeddynamical state of large semi-major axis centaurs, whichconstitutes the third major line of evidence for theexistence of Planet Nine.

There exist two other, secondary lines of evidence forthe existence of Planet Nine, which we did not discuss inthis paper. The first is obliquity of the Sun (Bailey et al.2016; Lai 2016; Gomes et al. 2017). One reason we choseto not discuss this dynamical effect is because it is in-trinsically trivial. It is well-known that secular couplingbetween two mutually inclined orbits results in a regres-sion of the node of both orbits, meaning that the twist-ing of the giant planets’ orbital plane out of alignmentwith the solar spin-axis is an inescapable consequenceof Planet Nine’s existence. As a result, the genuinelyremarkable aspect of this calculation is not that a spin-orbit misalignment can be excited, but the fact that aPlanet Nine configuration close to the one deduced fromdistant Kuiper belt constraints can adequately reproduce

to the progressive dominance of the angle ψres over φres (see equa-tion 4) as the resonant guiding center.

the solar obliquity, when its gravitational influence is ex-erted over the entire lifetime of the solar system.

At the same time, we note that strictly speaking,Planet Nine is not required to explain the obliquity ofthe sun, and other theoretical models exist. For ex-ample, Batygin (2012) argued that a primordial binarycompanion to the solar system could have excited the ob-served spin-orbit misalignment through the same exactmechanism, while Lai et al. (2011) have proposed thatmagnetic interactions between the sun and the inner re-gions of the protosolar nebula could have accomplishedthe same task. We note however, that while a multitudeof processes could have contributed to the observed obliq-uity of the sun, the gravitational influence of Planet Nineprovides the only dynamical mechanism that is directlytestable.

Another population of objects that Planet Nine natu-rally generates is the highly inclined component of theproximate (a < 100 AU) Kuiper belt. This subset ofbodies includes all objects with i & 35 deg that do notnaturally emerge from simulations of the solar system’sprimordial evolution (Levison et al. 2008; Batygin et al.2011; Nesvorny 2015), and include the retrograde ob-jects “Drac” (Gladman et al. 2009) and “Niku” (Chenet al. 2016). While these objects appear observationallydistinct from the nearly-perpendicular high semi-majoraxis centaurs discussed above, full-fledged N -body simu-lations reported in (Batygin & Brown 2016b) show thatthe highly inclined a < 100 AU objects are simply thelarge-a objects that have been scattered inwards by Nep-tune. As a consequence, they do not require a sepa-rate dynamical explanation from the objects undergoinglarge-scale orbital excursions discussed in section 5.2 ofthis paper.

Cumulatively, the aforementioned lines of evidenceconstitute a compelling case for the existence of PlanetNine, as none of the objects within the current obser-vational dataset exert any significant tension upon themodel. In light of this broadranging agreement, (shortof direct detection of Planet Nine) the most direct avenuetowards further reinforcement or falsification of our the-ory is the continued detection of a & 250 AU Kuiper beltobjects with the aim to better establish the statisticalsignificance of the clustering of longitudes of perihelionand ascending node (Brown 2017; Shankman et al. 2017).To this end, we reiterate that even though contaminationof the clustered orbital pattern by unconfined particlesis an expected result of P9’s gravitational influence, anotable grouping of long-period trajectories in physicalspace remains a key feature of the dynamical model.

While the evidence for P9 remains strong, as alreadydiscussed in the introduction, a simple proposition ofan extant planet beyond Neptune does not amount toa meaningful theoretical prediction. Instead, the PlanetNine hypothesis is uniquely defined by the combination ofobservational signatures it explains and the specific dy-namical mechanisms through which these astronomicalpatterns arise. Thus, the final evaluation of the PlanetNine hypothesis will not simply correspond to a detectionof a planet beyond Neptune, but the confrontation of theoutlined theory with the dynamical evolution induced bythis planet. Thankfully, the observational prospects forthe direct detection of Planet Nine either through on-going or future surveys are quite promising (Brown &

19

Batygin 2016; Holman & Payne 2016a,b; Fortney et al.2016; Millholland & Laughlin 2017), and it is likely thatthe concluding assessment of the theoretical model out-lined in this paper will occur on a timescale considerablyshorter than a decade.

Acknowledgments. We are thankful to Mike Brown,Greg Laughlin, Chris Spalding, Matt Holman, GongjieLi, Tali Khain and Elizabeth Bailey for illuminating dis-cussions. Additionally, we are grateful to Sarah Mill-holland for providing a thorough and insightful refereereport, as well as to Charles Fairchild, whose generoussupport facilitated this collaboration.

APPENDIX

COMPUTATIONAL DETAILS

Throughout the paper, we have relied on various closed-form computations of the averaged Hamiltonian (specifically,expressions 1, 10 and 12), without explicitly stating how the calculations were carried out. Let us now comment onthe practical details inherent to these evaluations. In the plane, the cartesian coordinates of the particle’s positionvector, r, are given by the well-known relations (Morbidelli 2002):

x = a(

cosE − e)

cos$ − a√

1− e2 sinE sin$

y = a(

cosE − e)

sin$ − a√

1− e2 sinE cos$, (A1)

where E is the eccentric anomaly. Identical expressions (with subscript 9) apply to the position vector of Planet Nine.While the aforementioned cartesian coordinates are most naturally expressed in terms of the eccentric anomaly,

canonical averaging of the Hamiltonian is carried out with respect to the mean longitude, λ. The two quantities arerelated via Kepler’s equation. Therefore, rather than solving Kepler’s equation at every computational step to expressx and y in terms of λ, it is more convenient to integrate directly with respect to E, by introducing the Jacobian(Pichierri et al. 2017)

dλ = (1− e cosE) dE. (A2)

For the case of the doubly averaged secular Hamiltonian (1), it is appropriate to carry out the integral assumingthat λ and λ9 are not correlated. This is however not the case for singly averaged resonant and resonant-secularHamiltonians (10) and (12). Particularly, in these instances the mean longitudes of the particle and Planet Nine arelinked to one-another through the resonant relationship:

λ =φres − (k − `)$9 + k λ9

`. (A3)

Accordingly, in this case Kepler’s equation must be solved at every iteration, to obtain the eccentric anomaly of theparticle as a function of λ9.

In order to construct resonant-secular phase-space portraits in the J → 0 limit, it is necessary to first map out theequilibrium value of the resonant angle φres on the (e,∆$) domain. For the specific problem at hand, this can be doneby sampling the resonant Hamiltonian (10) as a function of φres along the a = (`/k)2/3 a9 line, and numerically findingthe the relevant local maximum. Incidentally, the equilibrium value of φres typically lies half-way in between thecollision curves, which are easily obtained by solving the simultaneous equations x = x9, y = y9, and substituting theresulting values of E and E9 into Kepler’s equation to yield the values of φres that correspond to collisional trajectories.

APSIDALLY CIRCULATING RESONANT ORBITS

In section 4 of the main text, we constructed a semi-analytic model for apsidally confined resonant orbits residingin interior 5:2, 2:1, 3:2 and 1:1 mean motion resonances with P9. As demonstrated in Figure (3), however, particlesresiding at somewhat lower values of semi-major axes (particularly those entrained in the 3:1 and 4:1 commensurabil-ities) predominantly exhibit apsidal circulation. Let us briefly consider the dynamical behavior of such trajectories ingreater detail.

Representative trajectories of particles locked in 3:1 and 4:1 resonances, drawn from the a = 700 AU simulationdescribed in section (3), are shown in Figure (12). The panels in this Figure are analogous to those depicted in Figure(4) of the main text, with the exception that the librating resonant angle which drives the dynamics has the form

ϕres = k λ9 − ` λ−$ − (k − `− 1)$9 = φres −∆$. (B1)

Because these orbits are characterized by circulation of ∆$, no resonant multiplets other than ϕres are in libration.Note further that eccentricity modulation associated with the evolution of the apsidal angle ∆$ is in this case verymild, especially compared to that shown in Figure (4).

In order to more closely examine the phase-space evolution of the apsidally circulating orbits, we follow the samesemi-analytic procedure as that outlined in section 4. To avoid redundancy, we focus exclusively on the 3:1 MMR,since the 4:1 MMR exhibits very similar behavior. In similitude with equation (7), we define the canonical coordinatesthat identify ϕres as a reference angle

Λ′′ = Λ/` ϕ′′res = −ϕres

20

0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4

resonant libration around 0 deg

3:1 MMR a = 337 AU

4:1 MMR a = 278 AU

0

90

180

270

360

0

90

180

270

360-180

-90

0

90

180

0

0.25

0.5

0.75

10

0.25

0.5

0.75

1

time (Gyr) time (Gyr)time (Gyr)

$ (deg) resonant angles (deg)apsidal angleeccentricity e

resonant libration around 0 deg

-180

-90

0

90

180

'res = 39 $9 $

'res = 49 2$9 $

Fig. 12.— Orbital time series of two resonant objects exhibiting apsidal circulation. The trajectories are drawn from the same simulationas those depicted in Figure (4), and correspond to the 3:1 (top) and 4:1 (bottom) resonances respectively. Unlike the apsidally confinedorbits depicted in Figure (4), these objects derive their resonant phase-protection mechanism from libration of resonant angles that containthe particle’s longitude of perihelion, $ (equation B1).

Λ′′9 = Λ9 + (k/`) Λ λ′′9 = λ9

Γ′′ = Γ + Λ/` ∆γ = γ − γ9 = −∆$

Γ′′9 = Γ9 + Γ + ((k − `)/`) Λ γ′′9 = γ9. (B2)

As before, upon averaging the Hamiltonian with respect to the fast angle λ′′9 , we are left behind with an adiabaticsystem that is characterized by a resonant degree of freedom in (Λ′′ − ϕ′′res) as well as a secular degree of freedom in(Γ′′ −∆γ).

Freezing Γ′′ at a value that corresponds to q = 35 AU at a = (`/k)2/3 a9 and setting ∆$ = −∆γ = π, we havecomputed the resonant phase-space diagram akin to those presented in Figure (5) for the interior 3:1 resonance.However, in this case, the Hamiltonian (10) was computed under the constraint of the resonant relationship (B1)instead of equation (4). The resulting (a − ϕres) diagram is shown in the left panel of Figure (13) with the result ofour N -body simulation over-plotted in red.

Unlike the long-term stable orbits that exhibit steady perihelion clustering, apsidally circulating trajectories shownin Figure (12) reside in the sub-domain of the (a − ϕres) diagram that is occupied by the ∞-shaped separatrix, andencircle this homoclinic curve from the outside. In contrast with the neighborhood of the elliptic equilibrium pointdiscussed in section 4.1, this phase-space domain is never fully swept by the collision curves as ∆$ swings from 0 to2π. As a result, trajectories that surround this resonance can safely rotate through all possible values of ∆$ withoutcompromising the resonant phase-protection mechanism.

This means that in the case of resonances characterized by libration of ϕres, there is no equivalent of the (e−∆$)collision locus that arises within the framework of MMRs characterized by libration of φres (shown as the boundingcurves in Figure 7). Nevertheless, the resonance that resides at the core of the apsidally circulating trajectory (asshown in Figure 13) undergoes topological changes driven by evolution of ∆$. In particular, as ∆$ shifts away fromπ towards 0, the ∞-shaped separatrix deforms asymmetrically and eventually vanishes, as two of the three associatedfixed points disappear. Finally, as ∆$ tends closer to 0, the remaining (elliptic) fixed point returns to the origin, suchthat the trajectory once again encircles ϕres = 0 at ∆$ = 014. In other words, as ∆$ circulates from 0 to 2π, theresonant center of ϕres experiences a concurrent oscillation about ϕres = 0 with an amplitude of order ∼ π/2 (as shownin the right panel of Figure 12).

In order to approximately elucidate the resonant-secular dynamics that unfolds in the ∆$-circulating regime, wehave computed the averaged Hamiltonian (12) under the constraint of the resonant relationship (B1). Following thediscussion outlined in section (4.2), we assume that the adiabatic invariant J = 0, and thereby confine ourselves to thea−ϕres equilibrium point that remains extant (and stable) in the ∆$ ∈ (0, π) range, and simply reflect the computedportrait onto the ∆$ ∈ (π, 2π) domain. The corresponding (e −∆$) diagram is shown in the right panel of Figure(13), with the N -body trajectory over-plotted in orange.

Although the semi-analytical secular portrait matches the numerically computed evolution well, we note that forthese apsidally circulating trajectories, the J = 0 assumption is a relatively crude one, since the orbit itself residesoutside the separatrix and does not directly encircle the equilibrium point. To this end, the kinks in the semi-analytical

14 The same picture applies to ∆$ shifting from π to 2π, but the opposite resonant equilibrium point survives in this case.

21

'res (deg) $ (deg)

e

339

338

337

335

3340 90 180 270 360

a(A

U)

1

0.9

0.8

0.7

0.60 90 180 270 360

336apsidal circulation

3:1 MMR

Fig. 13.— Semi-analytically computed resonant a−ϕ (left) and resonant-secular e−∆$ (right) phase-space portraits for the 3:1 MMR,assuming equilibrium libration of the critical angle given by expression (B1). Numerically computed trajectories shown in Figure (12) aredepicted with red and orange lines in the left and right panel respectively, signaling satisfactory agreement between semi-analytic theoryand N -body simulations. See captions of Figures (5) and (7) for further details.

curves shown in Figure (13) at ∆$ = π are an unphysical consequence of this assumption, and would disappear if theportrait was more carefully computed by carrying out the averaging process along the contour of a (a−ϕres) trajectorythat encircles a phase-space area greater than that occupied by the separatrix. In fact, the reason for which the J = 0approximation works relatively well in our calculation is that the area engulfed by the ∞-shaped curve is never big.Therefore, a more rigorous treatment of adiabatic theory can be carried out by assuming a non-zero but neverthelesssmall value of J .

Irrespective of the details associated with computation of the Hamiltonian (12) for ϕres-type commensurabilities,the results of the N -body simulation shown in Figure (12) as well as the semi-analytic calculations presented in Figure(13), point to the fact that resonantly protected trajectories that circulate in longitude of perihelion naturally arisewithin the framework of the Planet Nine hypothesis. Correspondingly, given sufficient data, characterization of thespecific semi-major axes that such trajectories occupy may provide key constraints on the present-day orbital state ofPlanet Nine.

REFERENCES

Adams, J. C. 1846, MNRAS, 7, 149Adams, F. C. 2010, ARA&A, 48, 47Bailey, E., Batygin, K., & Brown, M. E. 2016, AJ, 152, 126Bailey, E., Batygin, K., & Brown, M. E. 2017, in prep.Batygin, K., Brown, M. E., & Fraser, W. C. 2011, ApJ, 738, 13Batygin, K. 2012, Nature, 491, 418Batygin, K., & Brown, M. E. 2016a, AJ, 151, 22Batygin, K., & Brown, M. E. 2016b, ApJ, 833, L3Beauge, C., Michtchenko, T. A., & Ferraz-Mello, S. 2006,

MNRAS, 365, 1160Becker, J. C., Adams, F. C., Khain, T., Hamilton, S. J., &

Gerdes, D. 2017, AJ, 154, 61Beust, H. 2016, A&A, 590, L2Brown, M. E., Trujillo, C., & Rabinowitz, D. 2004, ApJ, 617, 645Brown, M. E., & Batygin, K. 2016, ApJ, 824, L23Brown, M. E. 2017, AJ, 154, 65Brunini, A., & Melita, M. D. 2002, Icarus, 160, 32Chambers, J. E. 1999, MNRAS, 304, 793Chen, Y.-T., Lin, H. W., Holman, M. J., et al. 2016, ApJ, 827,

L24Delisle, J.-B., Laskar, J., Correia, A. C. M., & Boue, G. 2012,

A&A, 546, A71Forbes, G. 1880, Nature, 21, 562Fortney, J. J., Marley, M. S., Laughlin, G., et al. 2016, ApJ, 824,

L25Gladman, B., Holman, M., Grav, T., et al. 2002, Icarus, 157, 269Gladman, B., & Chan, C. 2006, ApJ, 643, L135Gladman, B., Kavelaars, J., Petit, J.-M., et al. 2009, ApJ, 697,

L91Gomes, R. S., Matese, J. J., & Lissauer, J. J. 2006, Icarus, 184,

589Gomes, R. S., Fern Ndez, J. A., Gallardo, T., & Brunini, A. 2008,

The Solar System Beyond Neptune, 259Gomes, R. S., Soares, J. S., & Brasser, R. 2015, Icarus, 258, 37Gomes, R., Deienno, R., & Morbidelli, A. 2017, AJ, 153, 27

Gronchi, G. F., & Milani, A. 1998, Celestial Mechanics andDynamical Astronomy, 71, 109

Gronchi, G. F. 2002, Celestial Mechanics and DynamicalAstronomy, 83, 97

Henrard, J., & Lamaitre, A. 1983, Celestial Mechanics, 30, 197Henrard, J., & Caranicolas, N. D. 1990, Celestial Mechanics and

Dynamical Astronomy, 47, 99Henrard J., 1993, The Adiabatic Invariant in Classical Mechanics,

Dynamics Reported: New Series, Vol. 2, New York: SpringerHolman, M. J., & Payne, M. J. 2016a, AJ, 152, 94Holman, M. J., & Payne, M. J. 2016b, AJ, 152, 80Hoyt, W. G. 1980, Planets X and Pluto, Tucson, AZ: University

of Arizona PressKaula, W. M. 1962, AJ, 67, 300Kinoshita, H., & Nakai, H. 1999, Celestial Mechanics and

Dynamical Astronomy, 75, 125Kozai, Y. 1962, AJ, 67, 591Lai, D., Foucart, F., & Lin, D. N. C. 2011, MNRAS, 412, 2790Lai, D. 2016, AJ, 152, 215Marquis de Laplace, P.-S. 1799, Traite de mecanique celeste,

Paris: DupratLee, M. H. 2004, ApJ, 611, 517Le Verrier, U. J. J. 1846, Comptes Rendus, 23, 428Levison, H. F., Morbidelli, A., Van Laerhoven, C., Gomes, R., &

Tsiganis, K. 2008, Icarus, 196, 258Li, G., Naoz, S., Kocsis, B., & Loeb, A. 2014, ApJ, 785, 116Lidov, M. L. 1962, Planet. Space Sci., 9, 719Lowell, P. 1915, Memoir on a Trans-Neptunian Planet, Memoirs

of the Lowell Observatory. John Wiley & SonsLykawka, P. S., & Mukai, T. 2008, AJ, 135, 1161Malhotra, R., Volk, K., & Wang, X. 2016, ApJ, 824, L22Mardling, R. A. 2010, MNRAS, 407, 1048Mardling, R. A. 2013, MNRAS, 435, 2187Matese, J. J., & Whitmire, D. P. 1986, Icarus, 65, 37Millholland, S., & Laughlin, G. 2017, AJ, 153, 91

22

Michtchenko, T. A., Ferraz-Mello, S., & Beauge, C. 2006, Icarus,181, 555

Morbidelli, A., & Moons, M. 1993, Icarus, 102, 316Morbidelli, A. 2002, Modern Celestial Mechanics: Aspects of

Solar System Dynamics, London: Taylor & FrancisMorbidelli, A., & Levison, H. F. 2004, AJ, 128, 2564Murray, C. D., & Dermott, S. F. 1999, Solar System Dynamics,

Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressNeishtadt, A. I. 1984, Prikladnaia Matematika i Mekhanika, 48,

197Nesvorny, D. 2015, AJ, 150, 73Nesvorny, D., Vokrouhlicky, D., Dones, L., et al. 2017,

arXiv:1706.07447Pichierri, G., Morbidelli, A., & Lai, D. 2017, arXiv:1705.01841Pickering, W. H., & Pickering, E. C. 1909, Annals of Harvard

College Observatory, 61, 109Poincare, H. 1902, Bulletin Astronomique, Serie I, 19, 289

Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T., & Flannery,B. P. 1992, Numerical recipes in FORTRAN. The art ofscientific computing, Cambridge: University Press

Saillenfest, M., Fouchard, M., Tommei, G., & Valsecchi, G. B.2017, arXiv:1707.01379

Shankman, C., Kavelaars, J. J., Bannister, M. T., et al. 2017, AJ,154, 50

Tan, X., Payne, M. J., Lee, M. H., et al. 2013, ApJ, 777, 101Thomas, F., & Morbidelli, A. 1996, Celestial Mechanics and

Dynamical Astronomy, 64, 209Trujillo, C. A., & Sheppard, S. S. 2014, Nature, 507, 471Volk, K., & Malhotra, R. 2017, AJ, 154, 62Wisdom, J. 1985, Icarus, 63, 272Wisdom, J., & Holman, M. 1992, AJ, 104, 2022