ATDJune06
-
Upload
valencia-college -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
description
Transcript of ATDJune06
Achieving the Dream Achieving the Dream Quantitative OutcomesQuantitative Outcomes
SL and Non-SLSL and Non-SL Lower Level Math Lower Level Math Courses – Spring 2006Courses – Spring 2006
College Learning CouncilCollege Learning Council
June 1, 2006June 1, 2006
Institutional Research and Learning Assessment
A few thoughts…..A few thoughts…..
Early results are foundational to the Early results are foundational to the ATD work and formativeATD work and formative in nature.in nature.
Comparative outcomes over time will Comparative outcomes over time will bring deeper, richer results.bring deeper, richer results.
Early results offer great value in the Early results offer great value in the questions they offer; Culture of Inquiryquestions they offer; Culture of Inquiry
Quick OverviewQuick Overview
407 FTIC Students in 34 sections of SL 407 FTIC Students in 34 sections of SL math; 900+ total enrollments in SL.math; 900+ total enrollments in SL.
Students were unaware at registration that Students were unaware at registration that their math course was an SL section.their math course was an SL section.
FTIC SL-Cohort = 44.2% Caucasian, 23.6 FTIC SL-Cohort = 44.2% Caucasian, 23.6 Hispanic, 20.6 African American, 2.5% Hispanic, 20.6 African American, 2.5% Asian, and 9.1% Other.Asian, and 9.1% Other.
FTIC Degree-Seeking Population Enrolled in Lower Level Math Courses - Spring 2006
Caucasian44.2%
Hispanics23.6% Afric/Amer
20.6%
Asian2.5%
Other9.1%
Caucasian38.2%
Hispanics30.7% Afric/Amer
20.4%
Asian2.4%
Other8.3%
(Includes FTIC students from Fall 2005 and Spring 2006 enrolled in Spring 2006.)
N=407 FTIC's N=1,983 FTIC's
SL Sections Non-SL Sections
FTIC Degree-Seeking Population Enrolled in Lower Level Math Courses - Spring 2006
MAT001226.0%
MAT002449.0%
MAT103325.0%
MAT001233.0%
MAT002440.0%
MAT103327.0%
(N=107)
(N=101)(N=199)
Total N = 407 Total N = 1,983
SL Sections Non-SL Sections
(N=649)
(N=538)(N=796)
Mandate Levels for FTIC Degree-Seeking StudentsEnrolled in Lower Level Math Courses
SL vs. Non-SL
83
101
16
126
14610
4727
3014
33
413014
2226
233720
3727
2631
2732
28
2233
4048
24
2333
454036
SL Math (n=407)Caucasian
HispanicAsian Pac Isldr
African/AmerOther
Non-SL Math (n=1,983)Caucasian
HispanicAsian Pac/Isldr
African/AmerOther
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
No Prep Light Moderate Heavy
(Light = 1 prep area; Moderate = 2 prep areas; Heavy = all 3 prep areas)
(180)
(96)
(10)(84)
(37)
(757)(609)(49)(404)(164)
FTIC Degree-Seeking Success Rates in Lower Level Math Courses by SL vs Non-SL and Mandate Level
Spring 2006
60% 63.5%
52.5%
32.8%
57.9%53.2%
47.5%38.9%
No Prep Light Moderate Heavy0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
SL Non-SL
Courses: MAT 0012, MAT0024, and MAT1033
(+2.1) (+10.3)
(+5.0)
(-6.1)
FTIC Withdrawal Rates in Lower Level Math Courses by Ethnicity and SL vs. Non-SL
Spring 2006
58%
30%
39%33%
43%
31%38% 38%
African Amer Asian/Pacific Isldr Caucasian Hispanic0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
SL Non-SL
Courses: MAT0012, MAT0024, MAT1033
(-1)
(+1) (-5)
(+15)
FTIC Success Rates in Lower Level Math Courses by Ethnicity and SL vs. Non-SL
Light Mandate Level - Spring 2006
58%67%
62%
81%
50%57% 55%
50%
African Amer Asian/Pacific Isldr Caucasian Hispanic0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
SL Non-SL
Courses: MAT0012, MAT0024, MAT1033
(+8)
(+10)(+7)
(+31)
60%Caucasian20% Hispanic10% African/Amer
FTIC Success Rates in Lower Level Math Courses by Ethnicity and SL vs. Non-SL
Moderate Mandate Level - Spring 2006
45%50%
64%
43%41%
54%48%
52%
African Amer Asian/Pacific Isldr Caucasian Hispanic0%
20%
40%
60%
SL Non-SL
Courses: MAT0012, MAT0024, MAT1033
(+4)(+4)
(+16)(-9)
35% Caucasian26% African/Amer29% Hispanic
FTIC Success Rates in Lower Level Math Courses by Ethnicity and SL vs. Non-SL
Heavy Mandate Level - Spring 2006
25%
50%
35% 34%31%
55%
40% 40%
African Amer Asian/Pacific Isldr Caucasian Hispanic0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
SL Non-SL
Courses: MAT0012, MAT0024, MAT1033
(-6)
(-5)
(-5) (-6)
1/3 Caucasian1/3 Afric/Amer1/4 Hispanic
A few highs and lows….A few highs and lows….
African Americans had the highest withdrawal rate African Americans had the highest withdrawal rate (58.8%) and the lowest success rate (38%).(58.8%) and the lowest success rate (38%).
SL sections for Heavy remediation students SL sections for Heavy remediation students showed showed lowerlower success rates than non-SL for every success rates than non-SL for every ethnic group.ethnic group.
All ethnic groups in the Light remediation cohort All ethnic groups in the Light remediation cohort showed higher success rates in SL sections, with showed higher success rates in SL sections, with Hispanics earning the highest rate (80.8%).Hispanics earning the highest rate (80.8%).
What can we learn from SL What can we learn from SL attendance data?attendance data?
Fall '97(n=2624)
Completed Degree in 4 Yrs
Completed Remediation
in 2 Yrs
Fall '00(n=2775)
Fall '97(n=745)
Fall '00(n=966)
Completed 15 College Level
Hours in 3 Yrs
Completed 15 College Level
Hours in 3Yrs
Completed Degree in 4 Yrs
26%
22%
78% 43% 46%
49%
13%
15%
N/A
N/A
73%
72% 33%
36%
74%
Non College Ready
College Ready(No Remediation)
Completed Degree in 5 Yrs
Completed Degree in 5 Yrs
17%
18%
38%
41%
Completed Remediation
in 2 Yrs
49%
FTIC Student Progression - Fall 1997 vs Fall 2000