Asteroseismology and exoplanets: a lesson from the Sun *
description
Transcript of Asteroseismology and exoplanets: a lesson from the Sun *
![Page 1: Asteroseismology and exoplanets: a lesson from the Sun *](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062302/56815454550346895dc26a85/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
Asteroseismology and Asteroseismology and exoplanets: a lesson from the exoplanets: a lesson from the
Sun *Sun *
• Can we learn on exo-planets Can we learn on exo-planets from asteroseismology?from asteroseismology?
• Metallicity of stars with planets• The origin of metals in the Sun
photosphere and helioseismology.
Gianni Fiorentini, Barbara Ricci, Andrea Zanzi University and INFN Ferrara
*based on: A. Zanzi, Master Thesis, Ferrara University (2003)and discussions with Castellani Ortolani Paterno’
![Page 2: Asteroseismology and exoplanets: a lesson from the Sun *](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062302/56815454550346895dc26a85/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
The Chicken The Chicken and the Egg and the Egg dilemmadilemma
• Stars hosting planets look more metal rich.
• The metal content in the convective envelope of a solar type star with Z=0.016 is
MZ=120 Mearth
• To reach Z=0.024 an extra 60 Mearth are needed.
• Is the excess metallicity primordial or a result of accretion?
• Is it a surface/ bulksurface/ bulk effect ?ZZintint < or > Z < or > Zphph
• Need a look at the stellar interior: asteroseismology is the natural tool
Laws et al. Astro-ph/0302111Z=0.024Z=0.016
Fe/H
![Page 3: Asteroseismology and exoplanets: a lesson from the Sun *](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062302/56815454550346895dc26a85/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Dirty solar models• The Sun is a natural laboratory•Matter is falling onto the Sun (and presumably more was falling in the past)•The SSM (without accretion) has been accurately tested with helioseismology (& neutrinos)•Build solar models starting wih a lower metacillity and assume metal accretion occurs (shortly) after ZAMS.
• How much material How much material can have accreted can have accreted without spoiling the without spoiling the agreement with agreement with helioseismology helioseismology (& neutrinos) ? (& neutrinos) ?
![Page 4: Asteroseismology and exoplanets: a lesson from the Sun *](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062302/56815454550346895dc26a85/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
The lesson of diffusion
• SSM are in excellent agreement with helioseismology (for u, Yph, Rb…) when diffusion is included.
• The effect of diffusion is that Zph=0.9 Zint.
• This means that helioseismology is sensitive to changing by 10% the metal mass in the convective envelope, i.e. to 12Mearth
11 33
SSM-SUN
NO-DIFF
DIFF
SUN-MOD
![Page 5: Asteroseismology and exoplanets: a lesson from the Sun *](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062302/56815454550346895dc26a85/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Dirty solar models
• With respect to SSM, a dirty Sun is metal poor in the interior.
• molecular weight and opacity are changed
• Temperature, sound speed, Yph (&) can be changed
![Page 6: Asteroseismology and exoplanets: a lesson from the Sun *](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062302/56815454550346895dc26a85/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
• Can study the changement of several observables (sound speed, Yph, Rb, Tc)
• Helioseismic observables imply:
MZ <20 MEarth (at 3)
• [Boron neutrino flux gives MZ <30 MEarth ]
Constraints from helioseismology and neutrino
Mz [MEarth]0 10 20 30
SSM
SSM
![Page 7: Asteroseismology and exoplanets: a lesson from the Sun *](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062302/56815454550346895dc26a85/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Helioseismology and Asteroseismology
α Cen A astro-ph/0107099
Sun
• Heliosesimology is sensitive to O(10) Mearth
• For asteroseismology we need For asteroseismology we need sensitivity to O(100) Msensitivity to O(100) Mearthearth
• We are planning simulations ( which frequencies? Which accuracy ? )
• Asterosesismology can prove accretion theory:
Zint< Zph
• Howevever it cannot disprove it (if accretion occurred before ZAMS) .