Association and path analysis in F2 populations of pigeonpea

download Association and path analysis in F2 populations of pigeonpea

of 8

Transcript of Association and path analysis in F2 populations of pigeonpea

  • 8/10/2019 Association and path analysis in F2 populations of pigeonpea

    1/8

    AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION CENTRE

    www.arccjournals.com / www.legumeresearch.in

    Legume Res., 37(6) : 561-567, 2014

    doi:10.5958/0976-0571 .2014.00677.8

    ASSOCIATION AND PATH ANALYSIS IN F2POPULATIONS OF

    PIGEONPEA [CAJANUS CAJAN(L.) MILLSP]

    B. Krishna Chaithanya, L. Prasanthi, K. Hariprasad Reddy and B.V. Bhaskara Reddy

    D epartm ent of G enetics and Plant B reeding

    S.V. Agricultural C ollege, Tirupati-517 502, India.

    Received: 03-10-2013 Accepted: 18-05-2014

    ABSTRACTGenetic association among 11 F2population derived from 8 parental lines of pigeonpea was

    carried out for 11 characters. The correlation study revealed highest positive correlation for pods

    per plant and branches per plant in parents and also in addition to these 100-seed weight in F2

    progenies revealed that these characters may be considered for improvement of yield. Pods per

    plant reco rded the highest direct e ffect on see d yield followed by pod length, seeds per pod, plant

    height and branches per plant while SCMR at 50 per cent flowering showed negative direct effect on

    seed yield.

    Keywords: Association, Path analysis, Pigeonpea.

    INTRODUCTION

    Pigeonpea [Cajanus Cajan(L.) M illsp] is the

    second largest pulse crop w ith diversified uses as

    food, fodder and fuel. It has been recognized as a

    valuable source of protein particularly in the

    developing countries. A thorough know ledge of

    existing genetic variation and extent of association

    betw een various yield contributing characters is

    essential for developing high yielding genotypes in

    pigeonpea. C orrelation and path analysis w ill

    establish the extent of association betw een yield and

    yield com ponents and bring out relative im portance

    of their direct and indirect effects and thus give a

    clear understanding of their association w ith yield.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    Eleven F 2populations(LR G -41X IC PL-

    87119,LR G -41X IC PL -8863,TR G -22X IC P L-

    8863,T R G -22X IC P L-87119,T R G -7X IC PL -

    87119,TR G -7X IC PL -8863, IC PL-7035X IC PL -

    8863, IC PL87119X IC P-7035, BSM R-736X IC PL-

    87119, Piler localx IC PL-87119 and Piler localxIC PL-8863) derived from eight parents(LR G -

    41,TRG -22,TRG -7,IC PL-8863,IC PL-87119,BSM R-

    736 and P iler local.) w ere raised at R egional

    A gricultural R esearch Station, T irupati in a

    random ized block design w ith three replications

    during kharif,2009 adopting inter and intra row

    spacing of 90 cm x 15 cm . O bservations w ere

    recorded on fifteen random ly selected plants of both

    parents and F2progenies from each plot for plant

    height, days to 50 per cent flow ering, days to

    m aturity, num ber of branches per plant, num ber of

    pods per plant, pod length, num ber of seeds per pod,

    100-seed w eight, SC M R at 50 per cent flow ering,

    protein content and seed yield per plant. C orrelation

    coefficients (Johnson et al.,1955) w ere com puted

    and path analysis (D ew ey and Lu, 1959) w as

    perform ed.

    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

    H ighly significant positive correlation of yield

    w as observed w ith branches per plant and pods

    per plant in parents (Table 1) and in addition to these

    traits 100-seed w eight also show ed highly significant

    and positive association w ith seed yield per plant in

    F2progenies (Table 2) at both phenotypic and

    genotypic levels. The above results indicated that

    seed yield per plant could be increased w henever

    there is an increase in pods per plant, num ber of

    branches per plant and 100-seed w eight w hich w asalso reported by Anuradha et al. (2007) for prim ary

    branches per plant, M ittal et al.(2006) and

    Jogendrasingh et al. (2008) for pods per plant and

    Sarsam kar (2008) and Bhupendrakum ar (2009) for

    100-seed w eight. H ence, sim ultaneous selection

    based on these characters could be suggested for

    im provem ent in yield.

  • 8/10/2019 Association and path analysis in F2 populations of pigeonpea

    2/8

    562 LEG U M E RESEA RC H

    TA

    B

    LE

    1.

    Phenotypic

    (rp

    )

    andgenotypic

    (rg

    )

    corr

    elationcoefficients

    am

    ong

    seedyieldand

    its

    com

    ponents

    in

    8parents

    ofR

    edgram

    *

    SignificantatP=

    0.05

    **

    SignificantatP=

    0.01

  • 8/10/2019 Association and path analysis in F2 populations of pigeonpea

    3/8

    563Vol. 37, N o. 6, 2014

    TA

    B

    LE

    2.

    Phenotypic

    (rp

    )

    andgenotypic

    (rg

    )

    correlationcoefficients

    am

    ong

    see

    dyieldand

    its

    com

    ponents

    in11

    F2

    progenies

    of

    R

    edgram

    *

    SignificantatP=

    0.05

    **

    SignificantatP=

    0.01

  • 8/10/2019 Association and path analysis in F2 populations of pigeonpea

    4/8

    564 LEG U M E RESEA RC H

    TAB

    LE

    3.Pheno

    typ

    ic

    (P)

    an

    d

    geno

    typ

    ic(

    G

    )

    pa

    th

    coe

    fficien

    ts

    be

    tw

    een

    see

    d

    yie

    ld

    an

    d

    its

    com

    ponen

    ts

    for

    8

    Paren

    ts

    in

    Pheno

    typ

    ic

    res

    idua

    l

    effec

    t

    =

    0.

    2179

    *

    Sign

    ifican

    ta

    tP

    =

    0.

    05

  • 8/10/2019 Association and path analysis in F2 populations of pigeonpea

    5/8

    565Vol. 37, N o. 6, 2014

    TA

    B

    LE

    4.

    Phenotypic

    (P)

    andgenotypic

    (G

    )

    pathcoefficients

    betw

    eenseedyieldand

    its

    com

    ponents

    for

    11

    F2

    progenies

    in

    R

    edgram

    Phenotypic

    residual

    effect

    =

    0.3509

    *

    Significant

    at

    P=

    0.05

    G

    enotypic

    residual

    effect

    =

    0.

    8842

    **

    Significant

    at

    P=

    0.01

  • 8/10/2019 Association and path analysis in F2 populations of pigeonpea

    6/8

    566 LEG U M E RESEA RC H

    In parents and F 2population, highly

    significant positive correlation w as observed

    betw een num ber of branches per plant and num ber

    of pods per plant suggesting that increase in num ber

    of branches results in m ore num ber of pods per

    plant. Sim ilar positive and significant correlation w as

    found in parents betw een character pairs viz.,

    num ber of seeds per pod w ith 100-seed w eight and

    SC M R at 50 per cent flow ering; pod length and

    SC M R at 50 per cent flow ering, indicating that

    increase in SC M R at 50 per cent flow ering increases

    num ber of seeds per pod, pod length and 100-seed

    w eight. In addition to this, in F2progenies, highly

    significant positive correlation w as observed

    betw een 100-seed w eight w ith pods per plant, pod

    length, seeds per pod and SC M R at 50 per cent

    flow ering, indicating that increase in pod length

    increases num ber of seeds per pod w hich inturnincreases 100-seed w eight.

    H ighly positive and significant association

    of seed yield w as observed w ith pods per plant,

    branches per plant and 100-seed w eight and also

    am ong them selves in both parents and the F 2

    progenies indicating that these characters should be

    considered in form ulating selection criterion for

    effective im provem ent of elite genotypes for seed yield

    in pigeonpea.

    The correlation coefficients were inadequate

    to interpret the cause and effect relationships.H ow ever, path analysis technique furnishes a

    m ethod of partitioning the correlation coefficients

    betw een various characters in to direct and indirect

    effect provides the actual contribution of an attribute

    and its influence through the other traits.

    Pods per plant recorded highest m agnitude

    of direct effects on seed yield per plant follow ed by

    pod length, seeds per pod, plant height and branches

    per plant in parents whereas seeds per pod recorded

    highest m agnitude of direct effect on seed yield per

    plant follow ed by plant height, days to 50 per cent

    flow ering, protein content, pod length, 100-seed

    w eight and branches per plant in F 2progenies

    (Table 3 and 4).

    Pod length, num ber of seeds per pod and

    100-seed w eight characters though expressed

    positive direct effects, their indirect effects through

    days to 50 per cent flow ering, branches per plant,

    pods per plant, SC M R at 50 per cent flow ering and

    protein content w ere negative resulting in negative

    non-significant association w ith seed yield. SC M R

    at 50 per cent flow ering exhibited negative direct

    effect and also negative and non-sign ificant

    association w ith seed yield but exerted positive

    indirect effects via plant height, num ber of seeds per

    pod and 100-seed w eight.

    In F2progenies, the direct effect of pods per

    plant w as highly negative and their association w ith

    seed yield per plant w as positively significant, due

    to high positive indirect effects via plant height,

    num ber of seeds per pod, 100-seed w eight and

    branches per plant. 100-seed w eight exerted positive

    indirect effects via seeds per pod, days to m aturity

    and pod length and resulted in significant positive

    association w ith seed yield. Sim ilarly branches per

    plant exerted high and positive indirect effects viaSC M R at 50 per cent flow ering, plant height, days

    to m aturity, days to 50 per cent flow ering and protein

    content resulting in significant positive association

    w ith seed yield. Pods per plant also exerted its high

    and positive indirect effects on seed yield through

    plant height, seeds per pod, 100-seed w eight,

    branches per plant, protein content and days to

    m aturity a nd exhibited significant positive

    association w ith seed yield. These results are in

    agreem ent w ith the reports of Salunke et al. (1995)

    that pods per plant and 100-seed w eight exhibited

    high positive indirect effect through days to m aturity,

    plant height, days to 50 per cent flow ering and protein

    content. Kalaim agalet al. (2008) also reported the

    highest positive and indirect effect of 100-seed w eight

    via seeds per pod and corroborates the results of the

    present investigation.

    In parents, branches per plant and pods per

    plant and in F 2progenies 100-seed w eight and

    branches per plant w ere show ed positive significant

    association and high positive direct effects on seedyield and high indirect effects via m ost of the

    characters. Thus, these are the characters that are

    of prim e im portance in determ ining seed yield and

    hence, should be given due im portance w hile

    form ulating selection criteria in the later segregating

    generations for the production of elite genotypes for

    seed yield.

  • 8/10/2019 Association and path analysis in F2 populations of pigeonpea

    7/8

    567Vol. 37, N o. 6, 2014

    REFERENCES

    A nuradha, B ., Koteswara Rao, Y., Ram a Kum ar, P. V. and Srinivasa R ao, V. (2007). C orrelation and path analysis for

    seed yield and yield contributing characters in pigeonpea.Andhra Agri J., 54. (1& 2), 9-12.

    Bhupendrakum ar. (2009). C orrelations coefficient am ong 11 characters in parental, F1 and F2 populations of pigeonpea

    [cajanus cajan(L.) M illsp.].Inter J Plant Sci.,4:1, 150-152.

    D ew ey, D . R. and Lu, K. H . (1959). A correlation path coefficient analysis of com ponents of crested w heat grass.

    Agron J.,51: 515-518.Jogendrasingh, B adana, V. P. and Shiv D att. (2008). C orrelation and path coefficient analysis am ong yield and

    its contributing traits in pigeonpea. Environ Ecology26:1396-1399.

    Johnson, H . W ., Robinson, H . O . and C om stock, R. E. (1955). Estim ates of genetic and environm ental variability in s

    oybean.Agron J., 47: 314-318.

    Kalaim agal, T., Am ala B alu, P. and Sum athi, P. (2008). G enetic studies in segregating population of pigeonpea.

    Crop Improv.,35 (1): 31-34.

    M ittal, V. P., Brar, K. S. and Pram jit Singh. (2006). Identification of com ponent traits contributing to seed yield

    in pigeonpea. J Arid Legumes.,3:2, 66-67.

    Salunke, J. S., A her, R. P., Shinde, G . C . and Kute, N . S. (1995). C orrelation and path coefficient analysis in early

    pigeonpea.Legume Res.,18:3, 162-166.

    Sarsam kar, S. S., Kadam , G . R., Kadam B . P., Kalyankar, S. V. and B orgaonkar, S. B . (2008) C orrelation studies in

    pigeonpea.Asian J Bioscience.,3:1,168-170.

  • 8/10/2019 Association and path analysis in F2 populations of pigeonpea

    8/8

    C o p y r i g h t o f L e g u m e R e s e a r c h : A n I n t e r n a t i o n a l J o u r n a l i s t h e p r o p e r t y o f A g r i c u l t u r a l

    R e s e a r c h C o m m u n i c a t i o n C e n t r e a n d i t s c o n t e n t m a y n o t b e c o p i e d o r e m a i l e d t o m u l t i p l e

    s i t e s o r p o s t e d t o a l i s t s e r v w i t h o u t t h e c o p y r i g h t h o l d e r ' s e x p r e s s w r i t t e n p e r m i s s i o n .

    H o w e v e r , u s e r s m a y p r i n t , d o w n l o a d , o r e m a i l a r t i c l e s f o r i n d i v i d u a l u s e .