Associate evaluation

55
The Ideal Teacher ? The Ideal Teacher Malesuada quis, egestas Pisi. Donec ac sapien. Puis ultricies, metus a Porttitor, dolor mauris

description

 

Transcript of Associate evaluation

Page 1: Associate evaluation

The Ideal Teacher

?The Ideal Teacher• Malesuada quis, egestas • Pisi. Donec ac sapien.• Puis ultricies, metus a • Porttitor, dolor mauris

Page 2: Associate evaluation

Faculty Report on Candidate Teaching

1)Professionalism, Leadership, and Initiative in the School Culture

2)Pre-active teaching skill & professional knowledge

3)Post-active skills and ongoing professional development

4)Interactive skills, teaching practice, and commitment to student learning.

Page 3: Associate evaluation

Is professional in manner and appearance.

The candidate’s manner and appearance show respect for the culture of the school and classroom, and acceptance of the responsibilities of/to the profession.

Page 4: Associate evaluation

Maintains a complete and functional plan book

This will be discussed at a later time.

Page 5: Associate evaluation

Initiates dialogue and responds earnestly to counselling

The candidate contributes to a positive dialogue and accepts suggestions amiable and earnestly. When the candidate can offer an alternative viewpoint, this is done professionally.

Page 6: Associate evaluation

The candidate shows initiative, creativity, and enthusiasm

The candidate readily agrees to all teaching assignments; volunteers to help in a variety of additional extracurricular, school, and classroom-related tasks; and actively consults with colleagues. The candidate also willingly shares new ideas and materials and initiates discussion and solution-finding in the classroom and school.

Page 7: Associate evaluation

The candidate is collaborative and involved positively and actively in

the school cultureThe candidate approach to the duties and individuals in the school setting is mature, thoughtful, and acceptable. Established school policies and practices are noted and followed and interactions with others are appropriate to the setting. The candidate also shows and active interest in school/board workshops, professional literature, and other sources of professional growth, and participates within the school community as a helpful contributor.

Page 8: Associate evaluation

Is reflective and proactive in addressing own professional growth

The candidate is able realistically to assess his/her teaching performance and growth as a professional. Continuous, honest, and beneficial self-reflection is evident.

Page 9: Associate evaluation

The candidate is punctual, dependable, and effective

The candidate arrives at school sufficiently early each day and is punctual for all lessons, discussion, and meetings with others in the school. Reliability and dependability are also evident in the candidate’s approach to supervisory duties, marking of student assignments, returning of school materials, and other professional opportunities.

Page 10: Associate evaluation

The candidate prepares and organizes the classroom

and materials

In addition to writing plans and updating the daybook, the candidate prepares the classroom materials before teaching and tidies up afterward. The organization is efficient, safe, and context appropriate and shows respect for the subject and the teaching & learning enterprise.

Page 11: Associate evaluation

The candidate is knowledgeable about how students learn

The candidate’s planning demonstrates knowledge about how students learn. The candidate incorporates course material, guidance, observations from the school, and professional readings. These are apparent in context-appropriate motivations, review without redundant repetition, and other planning functions

Page 12: Associate evaluation

Clearly describes and organizes purposeful student learning

experience

Instructional plans are thoughtfully and effectively sequenced, from initial teacher behaviours, through presentation steps to application, assessment, and evaluation. Student learning experiences are purposeful and appropriate for the subject context.

Page 13: Associate evaluation

Plans instructional approaches that are relevant, coherent, and

systematic

Instructional approaches thoughtfully address the subject and learning styles of the class.

Page 14: Associate evaluation

Plans thoroughly, selecting a variety of resources and an

appropriate lesson or unit model

Planning is thorough, with carefully developed background preparation. Planning is appropriate for the context and shows comprehension of curriculum design precepts.

Page 15: Associate evaluation

Sequences lessons and where appropriate links lessons to

long-range plans.

Daily lessons are meaningfully and effectively sequenced to achieve short-term and ultimately long-range expectations. The links are transparent and pedagogically sound.

Page 16: Associate evaluation

Uses a variety of assessment tools, and aligns assessment and

evaluation with expectations

Evaluation methods are thoughtfully selected, authentic, and clearly aligned with stated expectations.

Page 17: Associate evaluation

Tracks and efficiently records student achievement.

The candidate assesses and evaluates the degree of student learning and keeps useful and organized records. Authentic assessment methods are applied regularly.

Page 18: Associate evaluation

Appropriately assesses the learning environment and shows

insight into individual learner’s

The candidate is cognizant of the extent of effectiveness of teaching-learning events and the environment on student knowledge, skills, and values. With the limits of the teaching practicum, the candidate (a) shows sensitivity to the students’ special needs, (b) appropriately follows Individual Education Plans, and (c) tracks group and individual changes over time.

Page 19: Associate evaluation

Identifies and correctly interprets provincial and school board

expectations

The candidate’s decision making for planning is based on a understanding of the subject discipline, the Ontario curriculum, and school board policies and documents.

Page 20: Associate evaluation

Achieves expectations as described in plans

It is evident that the expectations as described in plans are fulfilled. The teacher-learning program is successful

Page 21: Associate evaluation

Next Session

Page 22: Associate evaluation

The candidate maintains a safe learning environment

The teaching-learning situation is physically and emotionally safe for students. The candidate shows a sensitivity to the needs and welfare of the class.

Page 23: Associate evaluation

The candidate maintains a safe learning environment

Arranges seating conducive to learning Classroom is overcrowdedStudents cannot see boardMonitors temperature & lightingDisregards temperature & lighting extremesStudents are always supervisedLeaves students unattended

Page 24: Associate evaluation

The candidate applies suitable varied, and bias free teaching &

learning strategies

Teaching and learning approaches are varied to heighten retention and motivation. These are suitable for the context and evidence respect for the subject and class.

Page 25: Associate evaluation

The candidate applies suitable varied, and bias free teaching &

learning strategies

Sensitive to the diverse needs and interests of the students. Acknowledges and respects the diverse backgrounds of students and their familiesBias towards a specific group (cultural, language, ethnic, or gender groups)

Page 26: Associate evaluation

The candidate engages students in active experiential learning

In groups, with the whole class, and in individual learning experiences, students are engaged. The candidate encourages, invites, and expects student participation, minds-on and hands-on.

Page 27: Associate evaluation

The candidate engages students in active experiential learning

Students are learning by doing Lessons are overly structured and permit little student inputTeacher lectures to studentsStudents are alert and on task Students exhibit boredom, off task

Page 28: Associate evaluation

The candidate motivates and sustains class involvement

The candidate arranges lessons or activities that maintain full student interest. This engagement may be intellectual or hands-on. It is sustained through the depth of student involvement, rather than the novelty of the situation.

Page 29: Associate evaluation

The candidate motivates and sustains class involvement

Captivating set/hook to engage students Assigns challenging workWork is repetitious and unchallengingAlerts non-performer Ignores non-performers

Page 30: Associate evaluation

The candidate effectively uses voice & nonverbal communication

There is a high degree of correspondence between nonverbal and verbal communication. The candidate’s gesture and gaze and control of voice volume, inflection, and rate contribute to the effectiveness of the presentations. Adjustments are made to suit the class and the occasion.

Page 31: Associate evaluation

The candidate effectively uses voice & nonverbal communication

Smiles, eye contact - body behaviour that shows interest and excitement Deadpan expression/lethargic posture or movementExpresses verbal enthusiasmDoes not vary tone, intensity, volume or paceSpeaks too softly - inaudible

Page 32: Associate evaluation

The candidate uses oral and written language appropriately

The candidate uses oral and written language appropriately or needs to correct: Spelling [ ], Use of slang [ ], Handwriting [ ], Grammar and/or level of language [ ].

How are you today?

Page 33: Associate evaluation

The candidate uses oral and written language appropriately

Speaks and writes in a professional manner. Uses slangUses vocabulary above the comprehension level of the students.Make frequent spelling and grammar errors.Illegible handwriting

What’s up Homie!

Page 34: Associate evaluation

The candidate generates enthusiasm, and respect for the subject and the

teaching-learning enterprise

The candidate’s demeanour, approach, and in-class strategies demonstrate interest in the lesson content and a positive view toward learning and schooling. The candidate conveys a genuine, positive feeling for students, the subject, and the process of teaching.

Page 35: Associate evaluation

The candidate generates enthusiasm, and respect for the subject and the

teaching-learning enterprise

Uses positive, affirming language

Uses negative, sarcastic language

States positive expectations

Makes negative comments about student ability

I know you can do this, but they are making me do it

Page 36: Associate evaluation

The candidate adapts instruction to meet the needs of learners

The candidate reacts effectively to in-class situations requiring re-teaching, rephrasing, accelerating, etc., for the whole group and for individuals. The candidate is aware of subtle/overt changes in student affect, and makes appropriate adjustments.

Page 37: Associate evaluation

The candidate adapts instruction to meet the needs of learners

Able to accommodate/modify lesson and create individualized learning opportunitiesIgnores unique learning abilitiesDoes not modify learning experiences for special needs students.

More that just saying you will provide extra attention

Page 38: Associate evaluation

The candidate is responsive, clear, and consistent in instruction

The candidate uses strategies that are appropriate for the age group, the subject content, and stated expectations.Communication and exchange/discussion are effective. Learning proceeds.

Page 39: Associate evaluation

The candidate is responsive, clear, and consistent in instruction

Gives complete instructionsStates single questionsStates long/multiple questionsRambles, uses scrambled discourse Uses vague language

Page 40: Associate evaluation

The candidate follows established class routines, adjusts as necessary,

and demonstrates flexibility.

The candidate effectively uses the routines that are in place in the class, but also shows flexibility when required.

Page 41: Associate evaluation

The candidate follows established class routines, adjusts as necessary,

and demonstrates flexibility.Creates routines that the enhance learning experience. Chaotic, unstable environmentQuickly adapts to the situationRigidly adheres to routine

Val’s assignment will help examine these-clapping alert, morning board work

Page 42: Associate evaluation

The candidate fosters decision-making, problem-solving, and inquiryThe candidate fosters active learning in “minds-on” and “hands-on” situations that are appropriate for the context. Students respond with deepening intellectual curiosity, higher order thinking, and a growing metacognition regarding inquiry processes.

Page 43: Associate evaluation

The candidate fosters decision-making, problem-solving, and inquiry

Creates student-directed learning experiencesUses lecture format exclusivelyCreates hand-on / authentic learning experiencesRote learning is over-emphasizedQuestions require low level thinking.

Page 44: Associate evaluation

The candidate poses appropriate questions, and responds effectively

The candidate’s questions and their pacing move learning forward. The level and kind of questions asked are age and context appropriate. The candidate’s reactions to student replies show respect for learners and the subject. They are based on active listening and task commitment.

Page 45: Associate evaluation

The candidate poses appropriate questions, and responds effectively

The candidate’s questions are clear and appropriate for the grade level and subject. Questions are too vague, not age appropriate, and off topic.Differentiates between unison and individual questions.Allows individual students to call out answersQuestions are followed by appropriate wait time

Page 46: Associate evaluation

The candidate has good rapportThe candidate treats students respectfully, uses positive reinforcement, and avoids sarcasm and threat. There is a positive classroom environment. The candidate relates well to all members of the class and is attuned to group and individual needs, interests, and strengths. In challenging situations, the candidate does not resort to sarcasm and threat either in voice or manner.

Page 47: Associate evaluation

The candidate has good rapport

Teacher treats all students fairlyThe teacher has favourite students Demeans studentsUses sarcasm and threat either in voice or manner.Teacher knows the individual strengths & weaknesses, likes & dislikes of each studentIgnores/avoids students

fairly and equally are not the same

last page

Page 48: Associate evaluation

The candidate effectively and fairly applies management strategies

A pro-active, fair, firm, and consistent stance is taken in maintaining appropriately high standards for student conduct. While teaching and supervising, the candidate is aware of the conduct and progress of students and takes steps positively and effectively to bring students back to their tasks. The candidate establishes a positive, comfortable relationship with individual students and with groups and the class.

Page 49: Associate evaluation

The candidate effectively and fairly applies management strategies

Specifies rules, reprimands rule infractionDoes not specify when rule needed, fails to correct rule infractionStops deviant behaviour Does not stop deviancy/deviancy increasesAttends task and deviancy simultaneously Ignores deviancy, continues task / ignores task, engrosses in deviancy

Page 50: Associate evaluation

The candidate employs a balance of student & teacher directed learning

The candidate recognizes the place and value of student-initiated learning and the need for student ownership of the problem to solve. The candidate also can effectively direct learning and engineer a balance to move learning forward and maintain an atmosphere of positive and productive engagement.

Page 51: Associate evaluation

The candidate employs a balance of student & teacher directed learning

The candidate recognizes the place and value of student-initiated learning Teacher dominates speakingStudent input is welcomedDoes not respect student knowledge

Page 52: Associate evaluation

The candidate paces lessons efficiently, manages effective transitions

When instructing or organizing tasks, the candidate attends to time allotments in relation to the difficulty of the material, the cognitive ability of the students, and the motivation for learning inherent in the lesson. The pacing of presentations is appropriate, and transitions among lesson segments are smooth.

Page 53: Associate evaluation

The candidate paces lessons efficiently, manages effective transitions

Begins lesson promptlyDelays lesson, students wait for instruction Instruction stays on task Lesson drifts off topicLesson segments compliment each other, logical flow Lesson is disjointedStudents are engaged for duration of lesson Students exhibit boredom

Page 54: Associate evaluation

The candidate uses resources & teaching aids successfully

The candidate effectively uses a variety of teaching aids and/or concrete materials and/or computer-assisted learning to motivate students and enhance concept development. These aids animate the presentations, and contribute to the achievement of expectations

Page 55: Associate evaluation

The candidate uses resources & teaching aids successfully

Materials are ready, smooth distributionDoes not have materials/ disorganized Skilled in the use of resources/technologyUnfamiliar, awkward in the use of resources/technologyTeaching aids simplify learningTeaching aids over-complicate learning