Modelling uncertainty : the transition to academic writing development in higher education
Assessment Transition to New Missouri Core Academic Standards
description
Transcript of Assessment Transition to New Missouri Core Academic Standards
Assessment Transition to New Missouri Core Academic Standards
Show-Me Curriculum AdministratorsFall Conference
Michael MuenksCoordinator of
AssessmentOctober 7-8, 2012
WHY?“The Common Core State Standards Initiative is a state-led effort coordinated by the National Governors Association Center for Best Practices (NGA Center) and the Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO). The standards were developed in collaboration with teachers, school administrators, and experts, to provide a clear and consistent framework to prepare our children for college and the workforce.”
1 Shanghai-China 5562 Korea 5393 Finland 5364 Hong Kong-China 5335 Singapore 5266 Canada 5247 New Zealand 5218 Japan 5209 Australia 51510 Netherlands 50817 United States 50020 Germany 49721 Ireland 49622 France 49625 United Kingdom 49433 Spain 48143 Russian Federation 45948 Mexico 425
Overall Reading
Scale
Significantly Above OECD Average
Not Significantly Different
(OECD Average 493)
Significantly below OECD Average
PISA 2009Program for International Student Assessment
PISA 2009Program for International Student Assessment
Overall Math Scale
Significantly Above OECD Average
Not Significantly Different
(OECD Average 496)
Significantly below OECD Average
1 Shanghai-China 600
2 Singapore 562
3 Hong Kong-China 555
4 Korea 546
6 Finland 541
9 Japan 529
10 Canada 527
11 Netherlands 526
13 New Zealand 519
15 Australia 514
16 Germany 513
22 France 497
28 United Kingdom 492
31 United States 487
32 Ireland 487
34 Spain 483
38 Russian Federation 468
51 Mexico 419
Overall Science
Scale
Significantly Above OECD Average
Not Significantly Different
(OECD Average 501)
Significantly below OECD Average
1 Shanghai-China 575
2 Finland 554
3 Hong Kong-China 549
4 Singapore 542
5 Japan 539
6 Korea 538
7 New Zealand 532
8 Canada 529
10 Australia 527
11 Netherlands 522
13 Germany 520
16 United Kingdom 514
20 Ireland 508
23 United States 502
27 France 498
36 Spain 488
39 Russian Federation 478
50 Mexico 416
PISA 2009Program for International Student Assessment
INCREASED RIGOR
“…while reading demands in college, workforce training programs, and life in
general have held steady or increased over the last half century, K-12 texts have actually declined in sophistication…”
(CCSS Appendix A, p.2 ) Text Complexity
Grade BandsPrevious Lexile Ranges New Lexile Ranges
(Aligned to CAS Expectations)
K-1 N/A N/A2-3 450-725 450-7904-5 645-845 770-9806-8 860-1010 955-1153
9-10 960-1115 1080-130511-12 1070-1220 1215-1355
Reading Study Summary
600
800
1000
1400
1600
1200
Text
Lex
ile M
easu
re (L
)
HighSchool
Literature
CollegeLiterature
HighSchool
Textbooks
CollegeTextbooks
Military PersonalUse
Entry-LevelOccupations
SAT 1,ACT,AP*
* Source of National Test Data: MetaMetrics Interquartile Ranges Shown (25% - 75%)
INCREASED EXPOSURE
“Elementary and secondary students are not required to read enough informational
text independently even though expository text makes up the vast majority of the required reading in college and the
workplace.” (CCSS Appendix A, p.2)
1.Computer-Based (w/ Adaptive Response and Multimedia Content)2.Performance-Based (Reflective of Real World Tasks)3.Integrated (Reading, Writing, Collaboration, Research)4.Interdisciplinary (Social Studies, Science, Humanities)5.Text-Dependent
“NEXT GENERATION” ASSESSMENTS MAJOR SHIFTS IN TESTING
Leadership
10
Standards drive curriculum/Curriculum is how and when you teach
Common Core State Standards OrganizationDon’t deconstruct – Look at the whole document
Progressions, Math Practices, Text Complexity, Glossaries, Appendices, etc.
The focus is fewer items to a greater depth.Professional learning will be a key component
Evaluate teacher content knowledge – Are there opportunities?
Fidelity of curriculum implementation – Are favorite units that are now inappropriate being abandoned?
Missouri’s Transition in ELA and MA
2011-2012• Development
of Model Curriculum units per grade and content area K-12
• Awareness presentations
2012-2013• Implementation of
Model Curriculum units K-12
• Regional professional learning focused on deep implementation of CCSS as illustrated by Model Curriculum
• Dual reporting of current assessments to both GLEs/CLEs and CCSS
• Administer current MAP-A
2013-2014• Continued
implementation of Model Curriculum units K-12
• Regional professional learning focused on deep implementation of CCSS as illustrated by Model Curriculum
• Dual reporting of current assessments to both GLEs/CLEs and CCSS
• Begin the process of updating EOCs to fully assess the CCSS
• Administer current MAP-A
• Field test Dynamic Learning Maps for Alternate Assessment
2014-2015• Full
implementation of Model Curriculum
• Continued regional professional learning
• Administer Smarter Balance Assessment Consortium (SBAC) assessments
• Administer Dynamic Learning Maps Alternate Assessment
• Field test EOCs designed to assess the CCSS
Optional Interim assessment system — no stakes
Summative assessment for accountability
Last 12 weeks of year**
DIGITAL LIBRARY of formative tools, processes and exemplars; released items and tasks; model curriculum units; educator training; professional development tools and resources; scorer training modules; and teacher collaboration tools.
Scope, sequence, number, and timing of interim assessments locally determined
PERFORMANCE TASKS
• ELA / Literacy• Math
Re-take option available
The Smarter Balanced Assessment System
* Summative and interim assessments for grades 3 – 8 and 11, with additional supporting assessments for grades 9 and 10.** Time windows may be adjusted based on results from the research agenda and final implementation decisions.
English Language Arts/Literacy and Mathematics, Grades 3 – 8 and High School*
Computer Adaptive Assessment and Performance Tasks
INTERIM ASSESSMENT
Computer Adaptive Assessment and Performance Tasks
INTERIM ASSESSMENT
COMPUTER ADAPTIVE
ASSESSMENTELA/Literacy &
Math
Comprehensive Assessment System
EMBEDDED TASKS ASSESSMENTS A series of more than 100 items/tasks per year embedded within
instruction, each with various forms and scaffolds to allow for customization to student needs. Each task typically requires one
to five minutes for completion.
The Dynamic Learning Maps Assessment Consortium (DLM)
DIGITAL LIBRARY of learning maps; professional development resources; guidelines for IEP development and student selection for the alternate assessment; instructionally relevant tasks with guidelines for use materials, accommodations, and scaffolding; automated scoring (for most) and diagnostic feedback; and online reporting system.
END-OF-YEARADAPTIVE
ASSESSMENT
* Alternate assessment systems are those developed for students with the most significant cognitive disabilities and are based on alternate achievement standards.** Research will be conducted to review the technical feasibility of using data from the tasks for summative accountability purposes.
Instructionally embedded tasks used with all DLM students. States may choose to use aggregate data for summative purposes (state decision).*
Summative assessment for accountability for those states that choose not to use the embedded tasks for accountability.
Two options for summative assessment**
Developed by The Center for K–12 Assessment & Performance Management at ETS. For detailed information on DLM, go to www.dynamiclearningmaps.org.
Alternate Assessment System
English Language Arts and Mathematics, Grades 3–8 and High School
SAMPLE ASSESSMENTSSMARTER BALANCED ASSESSMENTS
Three Parts: Interim, Summative and Formative
Smarter Balance
15
1. Interim (open anytime) – Take away the mystery of the test at the end of the year!
• Pre-test students• This is a non-secure item bank
• Teachers can create their own assessment or use provided test templates
Smarter Balance
16
2. Summative (Window – 12 weeks in the spring)• Secure Item Bank• Online Computer Adaptive Technology
The next question is based on your answer to the current question. Like the Nursing Boards, GRE, etc.
Question can be from the previous year or, if you are advanced, from the next year.
Everyone will have a different testAll types of questions and several sessions
SR, CR, PE, TEGrades 3-8, and11
Smarter Balance
17
3.Formative (open anytime)• Teacher help center
• Scoring rubrics, tools for teaching, videos, tools for student evaluation
• Social professional networking, collaboration, pooling resources
• Professional development
Technology Readiness
18
• All the consortia assessments are technology based.
•Completing the technology readiness survey and updating it is very important. Make sure your tech people are completing this
and keeping it up to date. Call the Assessment Section if you need
technical assistance with the survey.
•Keep new technology specifications in mind when making purchases.
•Plan for bandwidth upgrades.
Missouri Assessment Program Transition
19
Grades 3-82012-2013 – Normal testing, except PE and WP are
BACK in all content areas! Pilot of Smarter Balance assessments.
2013-2014 – Normal testing, except moving the Communication Arts and Mathematics assessments to align as closely as possible to CAS without changing test design or blueprint. Field test of Smarter Balance assessments.
2014-2015 – Implement Smarter Balance assessments in English/language arts and mathematics. Science assessments remain in place.
Missouri Assessment Program Transition
20
MAP-A2012-2013 – Normal testing2013-2014 – Normal testing with field test of
Dynamic Learning Maps assessment2014-2015 – New assessments in English
language arts and mathematics. Science assessments remain in place.
Item Exemplars: Performance Task
8th Grade Math Example.
DESE Smarter Balance CCSS HomepageSample Assessment Items & Explanations
Understanding the Model CurriculumDESE “How-To”
Model Curriculum
Smarter Balance Assessments
Sample Online Test Items