8/11/2019 Assessment Rubric for Language 4 Assignment

1/1

Presentation

(10%)

Organisation

(15%)

Content(20%)

Grammar(30%)

Vocabulary

(15%)

Bibliography

(10%)

Outstaning

(!"% $100%)

Abstract persuades readerto read paper. Formatting

is extremely consistent.Footnotes are appropriateand relevant. Graphics are

very well ntegrated to thetext.

The piece contains a very

well planned introduction,development and

conclusion. Paragraphing

is appropriate, with verygood development of

ideas. ery good use ofsubtitles!sections.

The piece is very pleasing toread, engaging and

informative. "ey concepts arewell defined. #hoice

examples and applications

support ideas very well. eryaccurate use of $uotations and

paraphrasing.

%se of a variety ofstructures, with virtually noerrors. %se of a variety of

appropriate lin&ing words.'pelling and punctuation

are accurate.

The vocabulary is very

well selected andappropriate to the topic,

and wide ranging.

#ollocations are correct.

The bibliography showscomprehensive research.

#onsistently uses aconventional referencing

system. The bibliography is

very well integrated to thetext.

Very Goo(&% $!!%)

Abstract $uite appealing.Formatting is generallycorrect. Footnotes areappropriate. Graphics are

well ntegrated to the text.

The piece contains a wellplanned introduction,

development and

conclusion. Paragraphingis appropriate, with good

development of ideas.Good use of

subtitles!sections.

The piece is pelasing to read,

interesting and informative."ey concepts are

appropriately defined.(xamples and applications

support ideas well. Accurateuse of $uotations and

paraphrasing.

%se of a variety ofstructures. )inor

inaccuracies occur when

more sophistication isattempted. %se of a variety

of appropriate lin&ingwords. 'pelling and

punctuation are accurate.

The vocabulary is wellselected and appropriate to

the topic, and has goodrange. #ollocations are

generally correct.

The bibliography shows

research. %ses aconventional referencing

system with only theslightest of inaccuracies. The

bibliography is wellintegrated to the text.

Goo(&0% $5%)

Abstract moderatelyappealing. Formatting is

correct with minorinconsistencies. Footnotes

are generally appropriate.Graphics are wellntegrated to the text.

The piece contains anintroduction, development

and conclusion.Paragraphing is generallyappropriate, with

acceptable development of

ideas. #orrect use ofsubtitles!sections.

#ontent is moderatelyinteresting and informative.

)ost &ey concepts arecorrectly defined. (xamplesand applications appropriately

support ideas. Generally

accurate use of $uotations andparaphrasing.

%se of a variety ofstructures, with only minor

inaccuracies. %se of avariety of appropriate

lin&ing words. 'pelling andpunctuation are generally

accurate.

The vocabulary isgenerally appropriate to

the topic. *ange andvariety of vocabulary aresufficient to communicate

ideas effectively.

#ollocations are generallycorrect.

The bibliography showssome research. %ses a

conventional referencingsystem only with minor

inaccuracies. Thebibliography is at least

partly integrated to the text.

'ails tomeet

epectations

(0% $5"%)

Abstract fails to appeal to

the reader, or is tooshort!long. Formatting fails

to appeal visually.Footnotes are not used or

too long. Graphics are notwell integrated to the text.

The introduction orconclusion are missing ordo not wor&. +deas are notvery well organised into

paragraphs or are looselydeveloped.

'ubtitles!sections are

somewhat inconsistent.

#ontent fails to interest thereader or is less than

informative. 'ome &eyconcepts lac& definitions.

(xamples and applications donot support ideas consistently.uotations and paraphrasing

are sometimes messy.

The range of structuresdoes not correspond with

an advanced level.Grammatical errors occurin some simple structures.%se of a limited number of

lin&ing words. 'pelling andpunctuation show some

inaccuracies.

The vocabulary issometimes inappropriate to

the topic. *ange andvariety of vocabulary are

somewhat insufficient tocommunicate ideas

effectively. #ollocations

are sometimes incorrect.

The bibliography is eithertoo short or shows little

discrimination. +ntends touse a conventional

referencing system but withinaccuracies. The

bibliography lac&sapproprite integration to the

text.

Completely

insu*cient(1% $ 3"%)

Abstract is missing or has

the wrong format.Formatting is erratic.

Footnotes are not used.Graphics are not used or

disconnected.

The introduction orconclusion are missing or

do not wor&. +deas are notwell organised into

paragraphs or are notdeveloped.

'ubtitles!sections areinconsistent or missing.

#ontent fails to interest thereader or is less than

informative. "eyconceptslac& definitions.

+deas are not supported byexamples nor applications.

uotations and paraphrasingare messy.

The range of structures islimitted. Grammatical

errors occur in simplestructures. %se of a limitted

number of lin&ing wordswith obvious repetitions.

'pelling and punctuationshow inaccuracies.

The vocabulary is lac&ing,failing to convey meaning

within the topic. *angeand variety of vocabulary

are insufficient tocommunicate ideas

effectively. #ollocationsare often incorrect.

The bibliography is eithertoo short or shows littlediscrimination. -ittle

evidence of the use of a

conventional referencingsystem. The bibliography is

not integrated to the text.