Assessment of troglitazone induced liver toxicity in a dynamically perfused two-organ...
Transcript of Assessment of troglitazone induced liver toxicity in a dynamically perfused two-organ...
POSTER PRESENTATION Open Access
Assessment of troglitazone induced liver toxicityin a dynamically perfused two-organMicro-Bioreactor systemEva-Maria Materne1, Caroline Frädrich1, Reyk Horland1, Silke Hoffmann1, Sven Brincker1, Alexandra Lorenz1,Mathias Busek2, Frank Sonntag2, Udo Klotzbach2, Roland Lauster1, Uwe Marx1, Ilka Wagner1*
From 23rd European Society for Animal Cell Technology (ESACT) Meeting: Better Cells for Better HealthLille, France. 23-26 June 2013
BackgroundThe ever-growing amount of new substances released tothe market and the limited predictability of current invitro test systems has led to an ample need for new sub-stance testing solutions. Many drugs like troglitazone,that had to be removed from the market due to druginduced liver injury, show their toxic potential only afterchronic long term exposure. But for long-term multipledosing experiments, a controlled microenvironment ispivotal, as even minor alterations in extracellular condi-tions may greatly influence the cell physiology. Withinour research program, we focused on the generation of amicro-engineered bioreactor, which can be dynamicallyperfused by an on-chip pump and combines at least twoculture spaces for multi-organ applications. This circula-tory systems better mimics the in vivo conditions of pri-mary cell cultures and assures steadier, more quantifiableextracellular signaling to the cells.
Materials and methodsLiver microtissues (aggregates of HepaRG+human hepaticstellate cells) and skin biopsies were cultured in separateinserts of a 96-well Transwell® unit (Corning), which werehung inside the chip with the membrane fitting directlyover the circuit. The tissues were cultivated either air/liquid interfaced (skin) or submerged in media (liverequivalent) for a culture period of 28 days. Exposing thetissues to troglitazone, the cultures were cultured for oneday in normal medium and were, subsequently, exposedto 0 μM, 5 μM and 50 μM troglitazone, respectively for
further 6 days. Application of troglitazone was repeated at12 h intervals simultaneously with the medium change. Ina further experiment co-cultures of liver and skin equiva-lents were cultured in a fully vascularized chip. Therefore,HDMECs isolated from human foreskin were seeded intothe microfluidic channel system using a syringe. Aftereven cell infusion inside the circuit the device was incu-bated in 5% CO2 at 37°C under static conditions for 3 h toallow the cells to attach to the channel walls. A frequencyof 0.476 Hz was applied for continuous dynamic opera-tion, after 10 days of monoculture, skin and liver tissuewere added for co-cultivation for another 15 days.
ResultsCo-cultures of human artificial liver microtissues andskin biopsies have successfully proven the long-termperformance of the novel microfluidic multi-organ-chipdevice. The metabolic activity of the co-culture analysedin media supernatants reached a steady state at day 7 ofco-culture and stayed constant for the rest of the cultureperiod (Figure 1A). Furthermore, the co-culturesrevealed a dose-dependent response to a 6-day exposureto the toxic substance troglitazone. Liver microtissuesshowed sensitivity at different molecular levels. LDHlevels measured in the media supernatants increased sig-nificantly with increasing troglitazone concentration(Figure 1B). Furthermore, an induction of Cyp450 3A4levels on RNA level were observed (Figure 1C). In addi-tion, a robust procedure applying pulsatile shear stresshas been established to cover all fluid contact surfacesof the system with a functional, tightly closed layer ofHDMECs and co-cultivation of liver, skin and endothe-lial cells for 15 days was successful.
* Correspondence: [email protected] Berlin, Institute for Biotechnology, Faculty of Process Science andEngineering, Gustav-Meyer-Allee 25, 13355 Berlin, GermanyFull list of author information is available at the end of the article
Materne et al. BMC Proceedings 2013, 7(Suppl 6):P71http://www.biomedcentral.com/1753-6561/7/S6/P71
© 2013 Materne et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the CreativeCommons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, andreproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver(http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
ConclusionA unique chip-based tissue culture platform has beendeveloped enabling the testing of drugs or chemicals on aset of miniaturized human organs. This “human-on-a-chip” platform is designed to generate high quality in vitrodata predictive of substance safety in humans. Tissue co-cultures can be exposed to pharmaceutical substances atregimens relevant to respective guidelines, currently usedfor subsystemic substance testing in animals.
AcknowledgementsThe work has been funded by the German Federal Ministry for Educationand Research, GO-Bio Grand No. 0315569.
Authors’ details1TU Berlin, Institute for Biotechnology, Faculty of Process Science andEngineering, Gustav-Meyer-Allee 25, 13355 Berlin, Germany. 2Fraunhofer IWSDresden, Winterbergstraße 28, 01277 Dresden, Germany.
Published: 4 December 2013
doi:10.1186/1753-6561-7-S6-P71Cite this article as: Materne et al.: Assessment of troglitazone inducedliver toxicity in a dynamically perfused two-organ Micro-Bioreactorsystem. BMC Proceedings 2013 7(Suppl 6):P71.
Figure 1 Multi-tissue culture in the MOC device. (A) Liver and skin tissue performance over 28-day MOC co-culture. Metabolic activity of theco-culture analysed in media supernatants. (B) LDH values (C) Real-time qPCR of the cytochrome P450 3A4. Statistical analysis was performed byone-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by post-hoc Dunnett’s pairwise multiple comparison test. * P < 0.05 versus control. Data are means± SEM (n = 4).
Materne et al. BMC Proceedings 2013, 7(Suppl 6):P71http://www.biomedcentral.com/1753-6561/7/S6/P71
Page 2 of 2