Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC
-
Upload
satyam-rajvanshi -
Category
Health & Medicine
-
view
223 -
download
5
Transcript of Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC
![Page 1: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
ASSESSMENT OF MITRAL VALVE FOR PTMC
Dr Satyam Rajvanshi
![Page 2: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
HISTORY
![Page 3: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
• Early in the development of percutaneous mitral and aortic balloon dilation, the technique was considered to be experimental, unproven, and even dangerous.
• However, many invasive cardiologists had similarly been sceptical when they heard of the Swiss physician Greuntzig's proposal of balloon dilation of coronary arteries.
Circulation Vol 82, No 2, August 1990
![Page 4: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
• The surprising success of balloon angioplasty (1982) made cardiologists receptive to the possibility that balloons could effectively treat valvular stenosis.
Circulation Vol 82, No 2, August 1990
![Page 5: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
![Page 6: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
• Case Series & case reports published from 1985-1988 after Inoue’s publication; Also Double balloon technique
• Because it was experimental, patients who were poor candidates for surgical valve replacement were those initially chosen for mitral balloon dilation – ELDERLY, SEVERELY DEFORMED VALVE, HEAVY VALVULAR CALCIFICATION
![Page 7: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
• Even in these patients, balloon dilation was suprisingly successful at times
• The impressive results of surgical commissurotomy relied in part on surgeons' "almost mystical ability to select (surgical) candidates”
Circulation Vol 82, No 2, August 1990
![Page 8: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
• Which valves might respond to balloon dilation seemed to cardiologists an unanswered question??
![Page 9: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Br Heart J 1988;60:299-308
![Page 10: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Circulation Vol 79 No 3, March 1989
![Page 11: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Circulation Vol 82 No 3, August 1990
![Page 12: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Predictive variables
• Factors assessed to predict optimal or suboptimal outcome
• Suboptimal – Any 1 or more• Final valve area < 1 cm2 / <1.5 cm2 in later studies• post-dilatation mean left atrial pressure > 10 mmHg• Change in area < 25% of the initial valve area in those
with a mitral valve area > 1 cm2 before procedure
![Page 13: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Variables assessed in early studies
• Clinical– Age, Sex, Baseline Rhythm, NYHA class
• Echocardiographic– Structural features of MV and subvalvular
apparatus– MVA (Planimety)– LA size– Grade of MR
![Page 14: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
• Hemodynamic– MVA– TransMitral PG– CO– PVR– LVEDP
• Technical– Balloon used– Effective dilating area of balloon– Number of inflations
![Page 15: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
RESULTS
• Clinical– Age, Sex, Baseline Rhythm, NYHA class
• Echocardiographic– Structural features of MV and subvalvular
apparatus– LA size– MVA (Planimety) – Grade of MR
Surprisingly, more severe stenosis or smaller baseline valve area did not predict Suboptimal outcome; smaller MVA as likely as larger MVA to give suboptimal results
Age, AF, NYHA class - weak predictors
![Page 16: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
• Hemodynamic– MVA– TransMitral PG– CO– PVR– LVEDP
• Technical– Balloon used– Number of inflations– Effective balloon dilatation area (EBDA)
Flouroscopic Calcium alsoWeak predictor
![Page 17: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
• Strongest & best predictor of immediate hemodynamic optimal result
MITRAL VALVE STRUCTURE
![Page 18: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
![Page 19: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
SCORE
![Page 20: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
![Page 21: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Most patients with a total echocardiographic score > 11 had a suboptimal result
Those with a score < 9 had an optimal result
The score failed to predict outcome in those with scores of 9 to 11
![Page 22: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
• Why 8?
• The sensitivity of the total echo score for predicting a "good" outcome - calculated for each score value - proportion of all patients with a "good" outcome who had scores equal to or less than that score value
• The specificity was the proportion of all patients with a suboptimal outcome who had a total echo score above that score value
![Page 23: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
![Page 24: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Echo score relevance
• Higher EBDA and Sinus Rhythm are significant favourable predictors
• Baseline AF rhythm also independently predicts restenosis
• Upto 50% pts – MR grade increased by 1+; 50% of these – MR decreased by 1 grade in follow-up; 30% pts - MR grade increased by >1+
Score ≤8 ≥8
Immediate optimal result 88% 44%
NYHA class improvement 90% 56%
Re-stenosis at 2 yrs by Echo
<10% 70%
![Page 25: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
EVALUATION OF PATIENT
![Page 26: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
INDICATION
• SYMPTOMATIC NYHA II or more• MVA < 1.5 cm2 in a normal sized adult (or < 1 cm2 / m2) • Favourable valve morphology
![Page 27: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
![Page 28: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
• Reasonable (IIa) in– symptomatic patients in whom surgery carries high
risk for adverse events or outcomes, even when valve morphology is not ideal,• restenosis after a previous BMV or previous
commissurotomy who are unsuitable candidates for surgery because of very high risk – very old, frail patients; associated severe ischemic heart disease; pulmonary, renal, or neoplastic disease; • women of childbearing age in whom mitral valve
replacement is undesirable; • Pregnant women with MS.
![Page 29: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
CONTRAINDICATIONS
• MR > 2+
• Left atrial thrombus• Severe commisural calcification (Bicommisural
heavy – Grade 4 calcification)
![Page 30: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
IF INDICATED
• ECG • CHEST RADIOGRAPH• ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY
![Page 31: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
ECG
![Page 32: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
• LAE• RAE• RVH• Atrial arrhythmias
![Page 33: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
![Page 34: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
![Page 35: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
![Page 36: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
• P wave duration and P wave dispersion correlate with MS severity
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2008;31:1620-4
• RAD & RBBB presence correlates with MS severity
Cardiology 2006; 105:219-22
![Page 37: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
• Acute hemodynamic changes following BMV produce corresponding changes in ECG, mainly in P wave and QRS axis
Indian Heart J 1998;50:179-82
![Page 38: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
RADIOGRAPHY
![Page 39: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
CHEST RADIOGRAPHY
• LAE• Calcification• PVH• PAH
![Page 40: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
![Page 41: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
![Page 42: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
VENTRICULOGRAPHY
• MV doming and calcification
• MR severity
![Page 43: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
• Subvalvular disease (Atkins)Mitral-subvalvular distance (ES)/AoV-Apex distance (ED)<0.2 – Severe subvalvular disease
End-systole End-diastole
![Page 44: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY
![Page 45: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Parameters assessed
• Severity of MS• Pliability of valve (suitability)• MR• LA thrombus• IAS • Other ass. Valvular ds• PAH
![Page 46: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
M-mode
![Page 47: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
• DE amplitude more than 18 mm – pliable valve
• EF slope less than 20 mm/sec – Severe MS
![Page 48: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
![Page 49: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
MS severity by planimetry
• PSAX• MAX opening in mid diastole• Plane perpendicular to orifice• Lowest gain setting• Open commissures included• Avg 3 cycles in SR, 5-10 in AF
![Page 50: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
![Page 51: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
• Limitation– Gain– Calcification– Commissure– Plane
![Page 52: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
MV separation index < 0.8> 1.1
![Page 53: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Valve mobility
![Page 54: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
• Wilkins grading 1-4• Reid grading 0-2 -- Extent of doming
![Page 55: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
Valve thickening
• < 4 mm normal• 5-8 mm – MILD• >8 mm – MARKED
• Valve thickness/post Aortic wall thickness<1.5 – Normal <2 – Mild 2-5 – Moderate >5 – Marked /Severe
![Page 56: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
Valve calcification
![Page 57: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
![Page 58: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
![Page 59: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
SubValve thickening
![Page 60: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
• PLAX• A4C/A2C
![Page 61: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
IAS
![Page 62: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
LA thombus
![Page 63: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
Scoring
• Wilkins• Reid (Br Heart J 1977;39:1088-92)
• Lung-Cormier (Antunes MJ, Acquired Heart valve ds, 1995)
• Padial (JACC 1996;27:1225-31)
• Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH)• Ain Shams (Echocardiography 2009; 26:119-27)
• RT3DE
![Page 64: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
Wilkins Score
![Page 65: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
Reid Score
![Page 66: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
Lung and Cormier score
![Page 67: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
Padial Score
• Significant MR post BMV– Uneven MV thickening– Severe subvalvular ds– Commisural calcification
![Page 68: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
Cutoff 10
![Page 69: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
Ain Shams
• Calcification– Leaflet margin – 2– Leaflet Body – 4– Commisure – 6
• Subvalvular thickening– Less than half - 4– More than half - 4– Full length - 6 Cutoff - 4
![Page 70: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
RT3DE
![Page 71: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
![Page 72: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
• Preprocedural MRDoes not predict success directlyBenefit of using larger balloon only in
absence of significant MR
• TEELA and LAA clotUnderestimates subvalvular ds
![Page 73: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
Scoring system problems
• Subjective, Semiquantitative• Echo diff of nodular fibrosis from calcium• Subvalve ds underestimation• Non inclusion of commisural calcium• Uneven distribution of pathology
• Combination of scores solves some of these problems
![Page 74: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
TAKE HOME MESSAGE
• BMV is feasible, safe, and successful, provided that proper assessment has been done pre-procedure
• Check Indications & Contraindications• Echo scoring – Combine scores, include
commisural calcium score• TEE to rule out LA clot esp in patients with AF• Periprocedural monitoring and follow-up is
essential
![Page 75: Assessment of mitral valve for PTMC](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042605/58ed0bf21a28aba6358b4583/html5/thumbnails/75.jpg)