Assessment of for Suitability of Ductile Iron Castings for cold climates
-
Upload
abdullah-ansari -
Category
Engineering
-
view
197 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Assessment of for Suitability of Ductile Iron Castings for cold climates
Abdullah Ansari
EN-GJS-400-18-LT Castings for Cold Climate
Technical Feasibility AssessmentA T Ansari
Business Case
• Current specification different for standard temperature EN-GJS-400-18-LT & low temperature versions EN-GJS-350-22-LT
• Two different specification take out flexibility from SCM and create a bottle neck for casting supply when sudden change in market demand
• Easiest way is to have EN-GJS-350-22-LT castings common for both climates– This comes with side effects as tensile is less & castings have to be designed with more
weight.– Thread engagements need to designed with bigger lengths– Fastener lengths increases
• Another option is to have EN-GJS-400-18-LT material common for both version with mandatory test of LTV qualifying– This technical acceptable to certification– From EN-1563 Casting standard point of view looks difficult– Technical feasibility assessment with available data will help to conclude
Background – GL note for cold climate
3
Define
Project Name Assessment of STV castings for LTV suitability
Objective Develop estimation tool for impact.Analysis of Impact data for tested castings of EN-GJS-400-LT
Benefits Flexibility to SCMCan cater to fluctuating market demandReduced casting weightLess chances of thread rip-off in castingFastener length can decrease
Project Team Abdullah Ansari Mr. Seenivasa Ragavan
Schedule Measure Analyze Improve Control
Jan-2014 Feb-2014 Apr-2014 Apr-2014
Define : Test Program
• Planned Actions– Identify casting manufactured for STV grade with normal process
control– Conduct normal testing for STV– Conduct additional impact test for LTV– Wherever possible test impact at various temperatures
• 25, 0, -10, -20, -30 & -40– Record the data for analysis.
Measure: Test Data
• Select supplier • Test data collected
– Tested 85 castings– 35 castings tested impact at -20 as well as -40– 42 Castings tested at -20– 8 Castings Tested at 25, 0, -10, -20, -30, & -40
• Results compiled for– Tensile strength– 0.2% proof strength– Elongation– Impact
Analyze: Relationship
• Regression analysis– 160 results analyzed in 3 steps– After removing 18 unusual reading, regression equation concluded
• Impact Avg = 50.5 + 0.220 Impact temp - 0.0661 0.2% YS(N/mm²) - 0.0422 TS(N/mm²) - 0.0646 % EL
• S = 1.36798 R-Sq = 83.5% R-Sq(adj) = 83.1%• Analysis shows impac testing temperature & 0.2% proof strength are most
significant predictor for impact value• R-Sq suggests that about 83% variation is captured
• Conduct Factor analysis for filtered data of 142 tests to find out contributing factors sequentially
7
Improve : Factor Analysis
8
Main Effect by Impact testing temperatureOther 3 are interaction effects between 0.2% proof, Tensile, elongation & impact testing temperature
Control : Calculate Impact at -40
• Filtered data of 80 castings which are tested at -20• Estimate impact value at -40 temperature for those 80 casting• Calculation results
– As per calculation only 6 castings qualify for impact at -40 for Avg 10J– As per Calculation other 71 casting qualify for impact at -40 for indv 7J– As per calculation rest 3 castings failed for even individual 7J but the
estimated value is more than 6J
9
Control : Impact estimation at -40
10
Technical Feasibility Assessment - Remarks• Feasibility comments
– EN-GJS-400-18-LT to pass for impact 10J Avg at -40 deg C is difficult– EN-GJS-400-18-LT to pass for impact 7J Indv at -40 deg C is very much
possible
• Input to Design– Design assessment to be done with 7J & related factor of safety.– If 7J average is acceptable, then with material EN-GJS-400-18-LT we can
move ahead– If 10J mandatory requirement then for material EN-GJS-350-22-LT we
may need to go back– Though GL guideline gives us option to choose EN-GJS-400-18-LT based
on pearlite content but it will be risky for fatigue life if required impact value not achieved.
11
Impact data distribution
12
-20 Calculated -40
Define – Close loop
Project Name Assessment of STV castings for LTV suitability
ObjectiveDevelop estimation tool for impact. Analysis of Impact data for tested castings of EN-GJS-400-LT
Benefits Flexibility to SCMCan cater to fluctuating market demandReduced casting weightLess chances of thread rip-off in castingFastener length can decrease
Project Team Abdullah Ansari Mr. Seenivasa Ragavan
Schedule Measure Analyze Improve Control
Abdullah Ansari
Thank You