Assessment of for Suitability of Ductile Iron Castings for cold climates

14
Abdullah Ansari EN-GJS-400-18-LT Castings for Cold Climate Technical Feasibility Assessment A T Ansari

description

Technical feasibility and risk assessment to use EN-GJS-400-18-LT in cold climates of -40 deg C

Transcript of Assessment of for Suitability of Ductile Iron Castings for cold climates

Page 1: Assessment of for Suitability of Ductile Iron Castings for cold climates

Abdullah Ansari

EN-GJS-400-18-LT Castings for Cold Climate

Technical Feasibility AssessmentA T Ansari

Page 2: Assessment of for Suitability of Ductile Iron Castings for cold climates

Business Case

• Current specification different for standard temperature EN-GJS-400-18-LT & low temperature versions EN-GJS-350-22-LT

• Two different specification take out flexibility from SCM and create a bottle neck for casting supply when sudden change in market demand

• Easiest way is to have EN-GJS-350-22-LT castings common for both climates– This comes with side effects as tensile is less & castings have to be designed with more

weight.– Thread engagements need to designed with bigger lengths– Fastener lengths increases

• Another option is to have EN-GJS-400-18-LT material common for both version with mandatory test of LTV qualifying– This technical acceptable to certification– From EN-1563 Casting standard point of view looks difficult– Technical feasibility assessment with available data will help to conclude

Page 3: Assessment of for Suitability of Ductile Iron Castings for cold climates

Background – GL note for cold climate

3

Page 4: Assessment of for Suitability of Ductile Iron Castings for cold climates

Define

Project Name Assessment of STV castings for LTV suitability

Objective Develop estimation tool for impact.Analysis of Impact data for tested castings of EN-GJS-400-LT

Benefits Flexibility to SCMCan cater to fluctuating market demandReduced casting weightLess chances of thread rip-off in castingFastener length can decrease

Project Team Abdullah Ansari Mr. Seenivasa Ragavan

Schedule Measure Analyze Improve Control

Jan-2014 Feb-2014 Apr-2014 Apr-2014

Page 5: Assessment of for Suitability of Ductile Iron Castings for cold climates

Define : Test Program

• Planned Actions– Identify casting manufactured for STV grade with normal process

control– Conduct normal testing for STV– Conduct additional impact test for LTV– Wherever possible test impact at various temperatures

• 25, 0, -10, -20, -30 & -40– Record the data for analysis.

Page 6: Assessment of for Suitability of Ductile Iron Castings for cold climates

Measure: Test Data

• Select supplier • Test data collected

– Tested 85 castings– 35 castings tested impact at -20 as well as -40– 42 Castings tested at -20– 8 Castings Tested at 25, 0, -10, -20, -30, & -40

• Results compiled for– Tensile strength– 0.2% proof strength– Elongation– Impact

Page 7: Assessment of for Suitability of Ductile Iron Castings for cold climates

Analyze: Relationship

• Regression analysis– 160 results analyzed in 3 steps– After removing 18 unusual reading, regression equation concluded

• Impact Avg = 50.5 + 0.220 Impact temp - 0.0661 0.2% YS(N/mm²) - 0.0422 TS(N/mm²) - 0.0646 % EL

• S = 1.36798 R-Sq = 83.5% R-Sq(adj) = 83.1%• Analysis shows impac testing temperature & 0.2% proof strength are most

significant predictor for impact value• R-Sq suggests that about 83% variation is captured

• Conduct Factor analysis for filtered data of 142 tests to find out contributing factors sequentially

7

Page 8: Assessment of for Suitability of Ductile Iron Castings for cold climates

Improve : Factor Analysis

8

Main Effect by Impact testing temperatureOther 3 are interaction effects between 0.2% proof, Tensile, elongation & impact testing temperature

Page 9: Assessment of for Suitability of Ductile Iron Castings for cold climates

Control : Calculate Impact at -40

• Filtered data of 80 castings which are tested at -20• Estimate impact value at -40 temperature for those 80 casting• Calculation results

– As per calculation only 6 castings qualify for impact at -40 for Avg 10J– As per Calculation other 71 casting qualify for impact at -40 for indv 7J– As per calculation rest 3 castings failed for even individual 7J but the

estimated value is more than 6J

9

Page 10: Assessment of for Suitability of Ductile Iron Castings for cold climates

Control : Impact estimation at -40

10

Page 11: Assessment of for Suitability of Ductile Iron Castings for cold climates

Technical Feasibility Assessment - Remarks• Feasibility comments

– EN-GJS-400-18-LT to pass for impact 10J Avg at -40 deg C is difficult– EN-GJS-400-18-LT to pass for impact 7J Indv at -40 deg C is very much

possible

• Input to Design– Design assessment to be done with 7J & related factor of safety.– If 7J average is acceptable, then with material EN-GJS-400-18-LT we can

move ahead– If 10J mandatory requirement then for material EN-GJS-350-22-LT we

may need to go back– Though GL guideline gives us option to choose EN-GJS-400-18-LT based

on pearlite content but it will be risky for fatigue life if required impact value not achieved.

11

Page 12: Assessment of for Suitability of Ductile Iron Castings for cold climates

Impact data distribution

12

-20 Calculated -40

Page 13: Assessment of for Suitability of Ductile Iron Castings for cold climates

Define – Close loop

Project Name Assessment of STV castings for LTV suitability

ObjectiveDevelop estimation tool for impact. Analysis of Impact data for tested castings of EN-GJS-400-LT

Benefits Flexibility to SCMCan cater to fluctuating market demandReduced casting weightLess chances of thread rip-off in castingFastener length can decrease

Project Team Abdullah Ansari Mr. Seenivasa Ragavan

Schedule Measure Analyze Improve Control

Page 14: Assessment of for Suitability of Ductile Iron Castings for cold climates

Abdullah Ansari

Thank You