Educational Technology and Education Conferences, January to June 2012, Clayton R. Wright
Assessing the Quality of Distance Education Programs: Items for Consideration, Clayton R. Wright
Transcript of Assessing the Quality of Distance Education Programs: Items for Consideration, Clayton R. Wright
8/14/2019 Assessing the Quality of Distance Education Programs: Items for Consideration, Clayton R. Wright
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/assessing-the-quality-of-distance-education-programs-items-for-consideration 1/29
1Clayton R. Wright
Assessing the Quality
of Distance Education Programs:
A Few Items for Your Consideration
Clayton R. Wright, PhD
8/14/2019 Assessing the Quality of Distance Education Programs: Items for Consideration, Clayton R. Wright
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/assessing-the-quality-of-distance-education-programs-items-for-consideration 2/29
2Clayton R. Wright
What is quality?
I need your help to define it.
What is the best cookie?
How do you know that it is the best?
8/14/2019 Assessing the Quality of Distance Education Programs: Items for Consideration, Clayton R. Wright
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/assessing-the-quality-of-distance-education-programs-items-for-consideration 3/29
3Clayton R. Wright
What cookie would you choose?
Suppose the cookie was a
treat for a deserving child?
Quality means different things to different
people and usually involves a comparison.
8/14/2019 Assessing the Quality of Distance Education Programs: Items for Consideration, Clayton R. Wright
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/assessing-the-quality-of-distance-education-programs-items-for-consideration 4/29
4Clayton R. Wright
Suppose the cookie was for a childSuppose the cookie was for a child
in a refugee camp or a rural school?in a refugee camp or a rural school?
8/14/2019 Assessing the Quality of Distance Education Programs: Items for Consideration, Clayton R. Wright
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/assessing-the-quality-of-distance-education-programs-items-for-consideration 5/29
5Clayton R. Wright
Defining quality
• The standard of something when
compared to other similar items.
• The personnel perception of excellence.
8/14/2019 Assessing the Quality of Distance Education Programs: Items for Consideration, Clayton R. Wright
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/assessing-the-quality-of-distance-education-programs-items-for-consideration 6/29
6Clayton R. Wright
Quality could be defined as:
John Daniels: Quality Assurance and Cross Border Higher Education in theCommonwealth: The Work of the Commonwealth of Learning at the Regulation of Cross-Border Higher Education: Issues and Trends Workshop co-organized by UNESCO and the
Ministry of HRD in New Delhi, India, September 21-22, 2006
“Fitness for purpose
at a minimum cost to society.”
8/14/2019 Assessing the Quality of Distance Education Programs: Items for Consideration, Clayton R. Wright
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/assessing-the-quality-of-distance-education-programs-items-for-consideration 7/29
7Clayton R. Wright
Why do we measure quality?
• Learner effectiveness or achievement
• Student satisfaction
• Faculty satisfaction
• Accessibility• Student retention and graduation rates
• Accreditation and credit transfers
• Student employability or pursuit of further education
• Cost effectiveness• Accountability to primary stakeholders
• Reputation and credibility (Dhaka)
8/14/2019 Assessing the Quality of Distance Education Programs: Items for Consideration, Clayton R. Wright
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/assessing-the-quality-of-distance-education-programs-items-for-consideration 8/29
8Clayton R. Wright
By measuring quality,
we obtain an indication
of our success, but
we also determinewhat we need to improve.
8/14/2019 Assessing the Quality of Distance Education Programs: Items for Consideration, Clayton R. Wright
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/assessing-the-quality-of-distance-education-programs-items-for-consideration 9/29
9Clayton R. Wright
What should be measured?
Quality may have institutional, local, national,
and international perspectives or context of use.
8/14/2019 Assessing the Quality of Distance Education Programs: Items for Consideration, Clayton R. Wright
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/assessing-the-quality-of-distance-education-programs-items-for-consideration 10/29
10Clayton R. Wright
Refer to the e-Learning Guild’s Handbook of e-Learning Strategy ,
http://www.elearningguild.com/content.cfm?selection=doc.817
Whatever
is measuredshould touch on
every aspect of the
student experience.
8/14/2019 Assessing the Quality of Distance Education Programs: Items for Consideration, Clayton R. Wright
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/assessing-the-quality-of-distance-education-programs-items-for-consideration 11/29
11Clayton R. Wright
Approaches to measuring quality
• The mystical view
• The reputation view
• The resources/input view• The outcomes view
• The value-added view
Valerie Lopes, Professor, Academic e-Learning, Seneca College
8/14/2019 Assessing the Quality of Distance Education Programs: Items for Consideration, Clayton R. Wright
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/assessing-the-quality-of-distance-education-programs-items-for-consideration 12/29
12Clayton R. Wright
A systematic approachto examining quality
• Inputs – resources required to support program
• Processes – how programs are offered
• Outputs – results of the inputs and processes
• Outcomes – long-range, qualitative impacts
The above is filtered thru the lens of “fitness
for purpose at a minimum cost to society”.
8/14/2019 Assessing the Quality of Distance Education Programs: Items for Consideration, Clayton R. Wright
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/assessing-the-quality-of-distance-education-programs-items-for-consideration 13/29
13Clayton R. Wright
If we focus on outcomes, we can ask:
Did we achieve the goals set by our institution? Can we achieve the samebenefits, but for lower costs?
Did we have an impact on our communityand our society for the better?
Are we measuring the right goals?
8/14/2019 Assessing the Quality of Distance Education Programs: Items for Consideration, Clayton R. Wright
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/assessing-the-quality-of-distance-education-programs-items-for-consideration 14/29
14Clayton R. Wright
21st Century Learning Outcome Goals(validated by 260 colleges)
• Technology Skills – computer literacy, internet skills
• Communication – reading, writing, speaking, and listening
• Computational – reasoning and applying mathematical concepts
• Critical Thinking and Problem-solving – decision making
• Information Management – analyzing and organizing info
• Interpersonal – building relationships, developing teams
• Personal – managing change, learning to learn, taking responsibility
• Community – ethical skills, citizenship, environmental awareness
League for Innovation and the Pew Charitable Trusts. (2000) Learning Outcomes for
the 21st Century. Mission Viejo, California.
http://www.league.org/league/projects/pew/
8/14/2019 Assessing the Quality of Distance Education Programs: Items for Consideration, Clayton R. Wright
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/assessing-the-quality-of-distance-education-programs-items-for-consideration 15/29
15Clayton R. Wright
Harvard University: program goals
• Equip students for participation in civic life
• Teach students to understand themselves interms of traditions of art, ideas, and values
• Prepare students to grapple with change
• Develop students'
understanding of the
ethical dimensions of
what they say and do
Ehrlich, T. (2007). Carnegie
Foundation Perspectives, Posting #36.
Stanford, CA. Carnegie Foundation for
the Advancement of Teaching.
8/14/2019 Assessing the Quality of Distance Education Programs: Items for Consideration, Clayton R. Wright
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/assessing-the-quality-of-distance-education-programs-items-for-consideration 16/29
16Clayton R. Wright
Knowing that:
• By the age of 38, today’s learner will have 10 -14 jobs.
• The amount of technical information doubles every 2 years.
• We are currently preparing students for jobs that don’t existthat will use technologies that haven’t been invented in order to solve problems we don’t even know are problems yet.
Isn’t it worth considering measuring non-content related
goals or the goals Harvard has for its programs?
From: Fisch, K. (2007) Shift Happens,
http://youtube.com:80/watch?v=pMcfrLYDm2U or shifthappens.wikispaces.com
8/14/2019 Assessing the Quality of Distance Education Programs: Items for Consideration, Clayton R. Wright
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/assessing-the-quality-of-distance-education-programs-items-for-consideration 17/29
17Clayton R. Wright
Measuring quality
• Self assessment and internal peer review
• Review by an internal or external panel
• Review of various statistics
that indicate performance and compare the results to benchmarks
• Interviews and surveys of staff, learners, instructors, graduates, employers, and accreditation
bodies
8/14/2019 Assessing the Quality of Distance Education Programs: Items for Consideration, Clayton R. Wright
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/assessing-the-quality-of-distance-education-programs-items-for-consideration 18/29
18Clayton R. Wright
What challenges can we expect?
• Time – To establish and implement quality assurance systems
• Expertise – Finding committed staff with expertise
• Buy-in – Recognizing the importance of quality, having ownership
• Employment of a large number of part-time faculty• Providing engaging material
• Providing timely, positive, and nurturing feedback
• Finance – Attaining 60%-80% of face to face costs
8/14/2019 Assessing the Quality of Distance Education Programs: Items for Consideration, Clayton R. Wright
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/assessing-the-quality-of-distance-education-programs-items-for-consideration 19/29
19Clayton R. Wright
Suggestions for improving
quality assurance
• Establish course development, delivery,student support, and logistics that arecongruent with your institution’s goals,mission, values/ethics, and community
involvement.Be cognizant of words such as“accessibility, equity, flexibility, and
just-in-time learning”.
8/14/2019 Assessing the Quality of Distance Education Programs: Items for Consideration, Clayton R. Wright
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/assessing-the-quality-of-distance-education-programs-items-for-consideration 20/29
20Clayton R. Wright
• Determine who your students areand their attributes then customize the materials, learning support, and
logistics that will meet their needs.
• Attain the same benchmarks as
traditional, face-to-face programs
and go beyond these benchmarks
-include digital media skills, etc.
8/14/2019 Assessing the Quality of Distance Education Programs: Items for Consideration, Clayton R. Wright
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/assessing-the-quality-of-distance-education-programs-items-for-consideration 21/29
21Clayton R. Wright
• Look at the outputs
“We need to look much more at outputs if we
seek to inculcate a culture of quality, and this
inevitably means more and better record
keeping and analysis, and more and better
research and evaluation.”
From: Tony Bates, Perspectives on Distance Education:
Towards a Culture of Quality published by COL
8/14/2019 Assessing the Quality of Distance Education Programs: Items for Consideration, Clayton R. Wright
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/assessing-the-quality-of-distance-education-programs-items-for-consideration 22/29
22Clayton R. Wright
• Establish an informal network to review
each other’s programs.
• Provide continuous opportunities for faculty and staff to participate in
professional development opportunities.
Quality Matters, Inter-Institutional Quality Assurance
in Online Learning, http://www.qualitymatters.org
8/14/2019 Assessing the Quality of Distance Education Programs: Items for Consideration, Clayton R. Wright
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/assessing-the-quality-of-distance-education-programs-items-for-consideration 23/29
23Clayton R. Wright
• Ensure that qualified editors review andproofread the materials. (Colombo to Bangkok)
• Assign someone whose primaryresponsibility is to monitor and researchquality.
8/14/2019 Assessing the Quality of Distance Education Programs: Items for Consideration, Clayton R. Wright
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/assessing-the-quality-of-distance-education-programs-items-for-consideration 24/29
24Clayton R. Wright
• Plan for future
possibilities that you
hope will never
happen.
Spend more time
asking the “what
if…” questions.(from Dhaka)
Develop decision-
tables. (UVic)
8/14/2019 Assessing the Quality of Distance Education Programs: Items for Consideration, Clayton R. Wright
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/assessing-the-quality-of-distance-education-programs-items-for-consideration 25/29
25Clayton R. Wright
• Realize that quality is not a static end-
point, but a dynamic, evolving process that
has an output that is constantly changing.
• Commit an identifiable
amount of resources to
initiatives that focus on
learners and learning.
8/14/2019 Assessing the Quality of Distance Education Programs: Items for Consideration, Clayton R. Wright
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/assessing-the-quality-of-distance-education-programs-items-for-consideration 26/29
26Clayton R. Wright
Effective e-learning courses:
• Are interactive and engage the learner
• Encourage critical thinking,problem-solving, and creativity
• Provide opportunities for online practice andknowledge transfer
• Offer timely, constructive,relevant, and frequent
feedback • Provide links to resources
beyond the content
8/14/2019 Assessing the Quality of Distance Education Programs: Items for Consideration, Clayton R. Wright
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/assessing-the-quality-of-distance-education-programs-items-for-consideration 27/29
27Clayton R. Wright
It is not only possible for distanceand e-learning programs to meet
existing standards for traditional
institutions, but to exceed them.
(UKOU)
The OU has an enrolment of 200,000
and was ranked 5th among all English
Universities for teaching quality.
8/14/2019 Assessing the Quality of Distance Education Programs: Items for Consideration, Clayton R. Wright
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/assessing-the-quality-of-distance-education-programs-items-for-consideration 28/29
28Clayton R. Wright
Quest for excellence
Understanding the concept
Action-orientation
Learner-centric approach
Innovation for change
Training to build competencies
Year-round activity
National Assessment and Accreditation Council, India: Seven Steps to Quality
8/14/2019 Assessing the Quality of Distance Education Programs: Items for Consideration, Clayton R. Wright
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/assessing-the-quality-of-distance-education-programs-items-for-consideration 29/29
29Clayton R Wright
Quality in
Distance Education Programs
For a more detailed discussion, contact:
Clayton R. Wright, PhD