Assessing Server Virtualization
-
Upload
samirjoshi73 -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of Assessing Server Virtualization
-
8/9/2019 Assessing Server Virtualization
1/12
-
8/9/2019 Assessing Server Virtualization
2/12
ASSESSING SERVER VIRTUALIZATION PAGE2
Efficiency, Flexibility, and Cost Savings Drive Server Virtualization Efforts
Industry analysts suggest that the nearly 80 percent drop in server prices over the last decade compels ITorganizations to purchase a new server for every new application, which leads to large-scale unusedserver capacity. By some estimates, utilization rates for servers average only between 5 percent and 10percent of total capacity.1
When deciding on such server provisioning, however, IT leaders frequently overlook the additional coststhat compose a physical servers total cost of ownership of a physical server, notably labor andoperational costs. For example, the labor required to maintain one small application server can costbetween $500 and $3,000 per month in a production environment.2 Aiming to minimize these costs byefficiently utilizing server capacity and reducing the number of physical servers, many IT organizationsimplement server virtualization.
Virtual servers give IT organizations the power to align the capacity of any kind and number of serverswith load continuously and precisely, thus enabling efficient use of server capacity.3 The followingdiagram summarizes the benefits that server virtualization can grant to IT organizations:
Benefits of Server Virtualization and Illustrative Case Studies
Pages 5-9 discuss the potential benefits and drawbacks of server virtualization in depth.
Technology
Overview
Benefits of
Virtualization
Drawbacks of
Virtualization
Deciding Whether
to Virtualize
Market
Overview
Source: IEC research
Fringe Benefits
RemoteManagement
DisasterRecovery
Planning
Virus
Detection
Server
RollbackCore Benefits
Efficiency
p. 5 p. 5
p. 7
p. 7
Adaptability
p. 6
Cost Savings
p. 8 p. 8
-
8/9/2019 Assessing Server Virtualization
3/12
ASSESSING SERVER VIRTUALIZATION PAGE3
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
Conservative
Aggressive
Analysts Expect Technology Improvements to Drive Market Growth Through 2009
The virtual machine (or virtual server) software market reached $330 million in 2004. 4 According to a2005 survey conducted by TheInfoPro, nearly 60% ofFortune 1,000 companies use virtual machinesoftware to virtualize servers, and another 30% plan to do so in the future.5
Analysts predict virtualization technology will continue to improve across the coming years, makingvirtual machine software increasingly easy to use and driving growth in the market. Notably, Microsoftplans to incorporate virtual-machine capabilities into the Windows operating system.6
Semiconductor giants Intel and AMD, however, are slated to release microprocessors that includevirtualization technology directly on the silicon chip 7, and in late 2005 XenSource, Inc. released open-source code for generating virtual servers on Intel-based hardware. 8 Both developments could tempergrowth in the virtual machine software market and shift spending to other areas in the overallvirtualization space.
The following graph illustrates projected growth in the virtual machine software market:
Projected Value of the Virtual Machine Software MarketMillions of Dollars
Technology
Overview
Benefits of
Virtualization
Drawbacks of
Virtualization
Deciding Whether
to Virtualize
Market
Overview
330 330
383 396444
475515
570 598
684 693
821
Conservative(16% Annual
Growth)
Aggressive(20% Annual
Growth)
2004* 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
* Actual Value
Source: Darrell Dunn, Virtual Showdown, InformationWeek, 15 August 2005.
-
8/9/2019 Assessing Server Virtualization
4/12
ASSESSING SERVER VIRTUALIZATION PAGE4
Virtualization Can Involve the Entire Data Center, a Single Server, or a Desktop Computer
In short, virtualization creates an abstracted operating environment, substituting physical computingelements with virtual machines (VMs) that replicate the original hardware or software they replace.9Virtualization was first developed in the 1960s to allow timesharing of large mainframe hardware.Today, virtualization can involve the entire data center, a single server, or a desktop computer.
Server Virtualization Enables the Partitioning of Servers and the Sharing of Resources
Virtual machine software utilizes spare capacity of servers by creating one or more abstracted operatingenvironments in that space. The software divides the physical operating system environment into severalVMs, each with its own set of virtual hardware upon which different operating systems and applicationscan run. In addition to running several applications on a single server, virtual machine software can alsoallow administrators to run one large application on multiple servers.10 Analysts predict that technologyadvancements in CPU virtualization will enable virtual machine software to manage the total resources ofthe server even more efficiently.11 The following diagram illustrates the differences between physical andvirtual servers:
Physical vs . Virtual Servers
Virtual Machine Software Products Use Hypervisors to Communicate with Server Hardware
An essential component of virtual machine software is the hypervisor, also known as the virtual machinemonitor. The hypervisor intercepts forbidden messages to the host OS and divides virtual environments. Itis also responsible for sharing the computers physical resources among the many VMs that could berunning and for redirecting virtual devices to physical devices.12
Technology
Overview
Benefits of
Virtualization
Drawbacks of
Virtualization
Deciding Whether
to Virtualize
Market
Overview
Server
Operating System
Application Unused
Capacity
Physical Server
Virtual Server
Source: IEC research
Server
Operating System
Virtual Machine Software
VirtualServer A
VirtualServer B
Operating
System
Operating
System
Application Application
-
8/9/2019 Assessing Server Virtualization
5/12
ASSESSING SERVER VIRTUALIZATION PAGE5
Server Virtualization can Increase Efficiency of Resource Use
Many IT organizations run applications on unique servers to ensure availability despite variable peakloads. Such provisioning, however, can lead to the common underutilization of server capacity mentionedabove. In turn, this underutilization can entail a variety of management issues, including the following:
Strain on facility space
Low administrator-to-server ratios Excessive hardware costs
Excessive maintenance and operational costs (power, cooling, etc.)
Server virtualization, however, allows IT organizations to pool excess capacity from physical serverswhile maintaining partitioned applications, thereby reducing the number of physical servers needed andlowering the associated management, operations, and maintenance costs.
Case StudiesEfficiency
Industry: Financial ServicesAverage Annual Revenues: $22 billionEmployees: 45,800
Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corp. lowers physical server count from 222 to 87 andincreases CPU utilization rates with server virtualization software
Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corp., a subsidiary of Japan-based Sumitomo Mitsui FinancialGroup, was faced with low utilization rates for the 222 servers in its U.S. data center.Additionally, the large number of servers entailed high facilities and labor costs. Toreduce the number of physical servers, IT executives replaced 149 of them with 14 blade
servers running VMware virtualization software, which created 216 virtual servers. As aresult, SMBCs IT organization has increased CPU utilization rates to 40 percent andexpects that the virtualization effort will save it millions of dollars over the next threeyears.13
Industry: Food Processing/Agribusiness2004 Revenues: $3.1 billion2004 Employees: 11,500
J.R. Simplot Co. avoids outgrowing its data center by implementing server
virtualization softwareIn 2002, food-processing and agribusiness company J.R. Simplot Co. was about to run outof space for server racks at its data center. To avoid a costly and inconvenient facilitymove, IT executives implemented VMware virtual machine software for both itsWindows and Linux physical servers. As a result, the companys IT organization was ableto eliminate hardware at roughly a 3:1 ratio and avoid outgrowing its data center. TodaySimplots IT organization has 150 Windows guest operating systems and nearly 50 Linuxinstances running on only 15 physical servers.14
Technology
Overview
Benefits of
Virtualization
Drawbacks of
Virtualization
Deciding Whether
to VirtualizeMarket Overview
-
8/9/2019 Assessing Server Virtualization
6/12
-
8/9/2019 Assessing Server Virtualization
7/12
ASSESSING SERVER VIRTUALIZATION PAGE7
Case StudiesAdaptability (Continued)
Industry: Technology2005 Revenues: $5.7 billion2004 Employees: 7,600
Qualcomm, Inc. virtualizes servers for application testing, nearly eliminating the timeneeded to create a test environment and saving $1.4 million in hardware costs
Faced with a completely separate physical-server cluster for applications testing, wirelesstechnology manufacturer Qualcomm, Inc.s IT organization saw hardware costs rising asdevelopers requested a new server to test each new application. To reduce hardware costs,IT executives implemented virtualization software from VMware. As a result,administrators were able to leverage spare server capacity to set up test environments inabout 30 minutes, as opposed to the nearly six weeks previously required to procure and
install new physical servers. Additionally, Qualcomms IT department consolidated itsservers by a 30:1 ratio and saved $1.4 million in hardware costs.23
Industry: Retail2004 Revenues: $12.1 billion2004 Employees: 31,500
7-eleven, Inc. accelerates application testing and streamlines server management withserver virtualization software
Faced with high hardware costs and time delays in server deployment, 7-eleven Inc.s ITexecutives implemented virtualization software from VMware in 2004. As a result,administrators were able to run multiple operating systems on a single physical machineand deploy virtual servers to development teams in a fraction of the usual time.Additionally, administrators gained the ability to manage servers from a central locationwith VMwares VirtualCenter, providing new servers and moving virtual machines todifferent physical servers as resource needs dictate.24
Technology
Overview
Benefits of
Virtualization
Drawbacks of
Virtualization
Deciding Whether
to Virtualize
Market
Overview
-
8/9/2019 Assessing Server Virtualization
8/12
ASSESSING SERVER VIRTUALIZATION PAGE8
Server Virtualization can Lead to Significant Cost Savings
Because server virtualization enables the efficient use of server capacity, IT organizations that run virtualservers are able to reduce or stop the growth of their physical-server inventories. As such, servervirtualization can reduce costs in the following areas:25
Hardware: Virtual servers can reduce server sprawl, thus reducing hardware procurement costs.
Labor: Monthly labor costs for a single physical server can reach $3,000. By reducing thenumber of physical servers needed and enabling central management, server virtualization canlower the staff hours needed to administrate each server and thus lower labor costs.
Operations and Maintenance: The total cost of ownership for physical servers also includes costs
for ordinary operations and maintenance, including the following:o Data center spaceo Powero Coolingo Network connectivityo Backup and recovery.
Because it can reduce the number of physical servers, virtualization can lower spending on thenecessary operational and maintenance costs for physical servers listed above.
Case StudiesCost Savings
Industry: Beverages/Food Processing
2005 Revenues: $577.8 million2005 Employees: 1,382
Welch Foods increases its administrator-to-server ratio and cuts maintenance costs inhalf with virtual servers
Faced with low server-utilization rates and less than optimal administrator-to-serverratios, IT leaders at Welch Foods, Inc. implemented virtualization software fromVMware. IT leaders virtualized 65 percent of the companys physical servers, increasingutilization by nearly 50 percent. As a result, the company increased its administrator-to-server ratio to 70:1 (the average is 30:1) and cut server-maintenance costs in half.26
Industry: Financial Services2005 Revenues: unavailable2005 Employees: unavailable
Stonebridge Bank virtualizes servers, removes 64 physical servers, and nearlyeliminates the cost of running backup cooling
In March 2005 privately held Stonebridge Banks IT executives, looking to increaseserver utilization and cut costs, implemented virtual machine software from VMware. Asa result, the company removed 64 physical servers and found it rarely had to run its three-ton backup air conditioner, which ran 24-7 during summer months prior tovirtualization. 27
Technology
Overview
Benefits of
Virtualization
Drawbacks of
Virtualization
Deciding Whether
to Virtualize
Market
Overview
-
8/9/2019 Assessing Server Virtualization
9/12
ASSESSING SERVER VIRTUALIZATION PAGE9
Potential Drawbacks of Virtualization Could Temper Cost Savings
Although server virtualization tends to increase efficiency, flexibility, and cost savings, industry expertsnote that virtualization can entail difficulties in several areas, including the following:
Patch management: If an administrator reboots a host operating system after applying a patch, allthe VMs running on that host OS will be taken down as well. This could lead to inconvenient andcostly downtime for the business.28
Security: Evidence suggests that attackers have already developed tools to exploit virtualenvironments, whether by searching for VM tools and drivers or by installing a mini-applicationthat detects the presence of VM environments (known as The Red Pill in reference to thepopularMatrix films) prior to an attack. If an attacker breaches a physical server known to be
running VM environments, damage could occur to all of the applications running on the onephysical server.29
Support: Major vendors are generally loath to provide support for their products if they determinethey are running in VM environments. For example, Symantecs Web site claims that the vendordoes not provide support for many of its products running in a VMware environment or in anyother Windows-emulation environment.30 Microsoft will not provide support for any of itsproducts running on non-Microsoft virtualization software.31
Licensing: Virtualization severs the ties that have historically bound software to hardware.Consequently, the traditional software licensing model of charging per CPU, which vendors stillwidely use, may force customers to pay full price for software that is not fully exploiting the
machine because it is in a shared virtual environment. Companies that do not press their vendorsfor policy changes could see software costs increase when they virtualize, as vendors mightcharge per CPU available to the software (which can be numerous in a virtual environment).32
Virtual-server sprawl: Although virtualization can keep physical server sprawl, the proliferationof multiple machines, in check, virtual machines can mult iply just as quickly. For example, manyIT organizations find that 10 physical servers can quickly become 100 virtual machines. Withoutproper management, such proliferation can cause operational problems, namely the disruption ofapplications running on all a physical servers VMs if the physical server is taken down.33
Technology
Overview
Benefits of
Virtualization
Drawbacks of
Virtualization
Deciding Whether
to Virtualize
Market
Overview
-
8/9/2019 Assessing Server Virtualization
10/12
ASSESSING SERVER VIRTUALIZATION PAGE10
Cost-Benefit Analysis and Risk Evaluation Should Figure Into Any Virtualization Decision
As they should with any strategic initiative, IT leaders should thoroughly examine the costs, benefits, andrisks associated with server virtualization before implementation. The following is a list of questions thatcan aid IT organizations in the decision-making process:
Questions to Ask Before Implementing Server Virtualization
Is the average CPU utilization rate at or below 30%?
Is the majority of our applications portfolio custom-developed?
Can our risk profile tolerate running applications on virtual servers, given that aproblem with one physical server could affect multiple applications at once?
Could virtualization improve our disaster recovery plans?
Do we have the resources to train administrators and managers to takeadvantage of the flexibility that virtualization provides?
Can our budget tolerate potential increases in licensing fees?
Do we want to implement grid computing?
Would virtualization help advance our SOA objectives?
Are we in danger of outgrowing our data center?
Is our administrator-to-server ratio below 30:1?
Technology
Overview
Benefits of
Virtualization
Drawbacks of
Virtualization
Deciding Whether
to Virtualize
Market
Overview
Source: IEC research
-
8/9/2019 Assessing Server Virtualization
11/12
ASSESSING SERVER VIRTUALIZATION PAGE11
1 Karen S. Henrie, Virtue in Simplicity; Virtualization software helps consolidate IT assets and cut costs, CIOInsight, 6 January 2006.2 ibid.3 Fred Hapgood, The Virtues of Virtualization, CIO , 15 September 2005.4 Lucas Mearian, Japanese Bank Expects Server Consolidation to Save It Millions, Computerworld, 10 October
2005.5 Ed Parry, Virtualization in the Data CenterA Look Ahead, TechTarget, 31 August 2005.6 Darrell Dunn, Virtual Showdown, InformationWeek, 15 August 2005.7 Michael Grebb, Thinking Inside the BOX,Banking Wire, 20 December 2005.8 Charles Babcock, Virtual Servers (For Real),InformationWeek, 12 December 2005.9 James E. Drews, Going Virtual,Network Computing , 14 September 2005.10 Don MacVittie, Storage and Servers,Network Computing , 18 December 2005.11 Jeffrey Burt, Intel, AMD Rev Virtualization, eWEEK, 7 March 2005.12 James E. Drews, Going Virtual,Network Computing , 14 September 2005.13 Lucas Mearian, Japanese Bank Expects Server Consolidation to Save It Millions, Computerworld, 10 October2005.14 Carol Sliwa, Open-Source Virtualization Beckons Users at LinuxWorld, Computerworld, 15 August 2005.15 Don MacVittie, Storage and Servers,Network Computing , 18 December 2005.16 Fred Hapgood, The Virtues of Virtualization, CIO , 15 September 2005.17 James E. Drews, Going Virtual,Network Computing , 14 September 2005.18 Sonny Discini, Host-Based Virtual Machine or Virtual Disaster?,Enterprise IT Planet, 26 May 2005.19 Michael Grebb, Thinking Inside the BOX,Banking Wire, 20 December 2005.20 Sonny Discini, Host-Based Virtual Machine or Virtual Disaster?,Enterprise IT Planet, 26 May 2005.21 Author Unknown, How to sell ServersThe art of saving energy, Computer Reseller News UK Edition, 14November 2005.22 Denise Dubie, Grid taking shape in enterprise nets,Network World, 10 October 2005.23 Karen S. Henrie, Virtue in Simplicity; Virtualization software helps consolidate IT assets and cut costs, CIO
Insight, 6 January 2006.24 Sonny Discini, Host-Based Virtual Machine or Virtual Disaster?,Enterprise IT Planet, 26 May 2005.25 Karen S. Henrie, Virtue in Simplicity; Virtualization software helps consolidate IT assets and cut costs, CIO
Insight, 6 January 2006.26 Deni Connor, Welchs reaps benefits from server virtualization,Network World, 4 January 2005.27
Michael Grebb, Thinking Inside the BOX,Banking Wire, 20 December 2005.28 Sonny Discini, Host-Based Virtual Machine or Virtual Disaster?,Enterprise IT Planet, 26 May 2005.29 ibid.30 www.symantec.com31 Microsoft, Support policy for Microsoft software running in non-Microsoft hardware virtualization software, 27October 2005.32 Jennifer Mears and Ann Bednarz, Advanced technologies muddy software licensing,Network World, 13 June
2005.33 Author Unknown, HP Attempts to Flatten the Bumps on the Road to Virtualization, eWEEK, 8 November 2005.
-
8/9/2019 Assessing Server Virtualization
12/12
ASSESSING SERVER VIRTUALIZATION PAGE12
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
The information contained in this report was researched using secondary-source search engines such asLexis/Nexis and Factiva, IT journals such asInformationWeekand Network World,company Web sites,
and Hoovers.
Professional Services Note:
The Corporate Executive Board has worked to ensure the accuracy of the information it provides to its members. This project
relies upon data obtained from many sources, however, and the Corporate Executive Board cannot guarantee the accuracy of the
information or its analysis in all cases. Furthermore, the Corporate Executive Board is not engaged in rendering legal,
accounting, or other professional services. Its projects should not be construed as professional advice on any particular set of facts
or circumstances. Members requiring such services are advised to consult an appropriate professional. Neither Corporate
Executive Board nor its programs are responsible for any claims or losses that may arise from any errors or omissions in their
reports, whether caused by Corporate Executive Board or its sources.
Corporate Executive Board
2000 Pennsylvania Ave NWWashington, DC 20006
Telephone: 202-777-5000Facsimile: 202-777-5100
www.iec.executiveboard.comwww.cio.executiveboard.com
www.aec.executiveboard.comwww.irec.executiveboard.com
www.pmo.executiveboard.com
www.eaec.executiveboard.comwww.dcoc.executiveboard.com