Capital Equipment Consulting Assessing our customers and their requirements.
Assessing Requirements Quality in Iterative Development
-
Upload
christen-conley -
Category
Documents
-
view
17 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Assessing Requirements Quality in Iterative Development
Assessing Requirements Quality in Iterative Development
1
How Does One Go about Achieving Quality? The very nature of the thing we produce,
source code, models, and other artifacts, is intangible.
We must assure that the thing produced has the requisite quality to meet the needs of the users and extended stakeholders.
REQUIREMENTS QUALITY DRIVES SYSTEM QUALITY.
2
Software Project Quality
“Quality is conformance to requirements” “Quality is achieved when the software is ‘good enough’” “Quality is ultimately situational and objective” “Quality is the characteristic of having demonstrated the
achievement of producing a product that meets or exceeds agreed-upon requirements – as measured by agreed-upon measures and criteria – and that is produced by an agreed-upon process” [Rational Software Corporation 2002]
3
Software Project Quality (Cont’d)
Quality is a multidimensional concept that address two primary dimensions: The end result of the application itself The business impact on the producer and consumer
What we have studied in this course is how to effectively manage requirements to help the development team assure that the product or system being developed meets or exceeds agreed-on requirements and to apply an agreed-on process to help assure that those results are achieved.
4
Assessing Quality in Iterative Development When we complete the delivery of an iteration
we can ask the following questions: “Does it do what we said it would do?” “Does is appear to meet the requirements as we
know them at this time?” “Did we do it about when we said we would?” Now that you can see a bit of this thing, is this what
you really wanted? Is this what you really meant?” We can look at the artifacts of the process and
inspect them for quality as well. These artifacts demonstrate that the process is being followed as well.
5
Requirements Artifacts Sets
Team Skill Requirements Set Set contents1: Analyzing the Problem
Problem set Problem statement
Root cause analysis
Systems model
List of design and development constraints
List of actors
Business use-case model
2: Understanding User and Stakeholder needs
User needs set Structured interview, process, and results
Understanding of users and user needs
Requirements workshop process and results
Preliminary list of prioritized features
Storyboards, example use cases, etc.
3: Defining the System Preliminary system definition set
Requirements organization
Vision document
Identification of initial use cases
Empowerment of product manager/champion
Definitions of commercial factors
6
Requirements Artifacts Sets (Cont’d)
Team Skill Requirements Set Set contents4: Managing Scope Baseline set Prioritization and estimation of features
Requirements baseline
Recognition and communication of achievable scope
Agreed-on expectations
5: Refining the System Definition
Refined system definition set Use-case model(s)
Use-case specifications
Supplementary specification(s)
Ambiguity and specificity considerations
Technical methods (if any)
6: Building the Right System
System under construction set
Transitioning method (from design to code)
Test cases (derived and traceable from use cases)
Requirements traceability
Requirements change management process
Requirements method
7
Performing the Assessment
We have already put in place an iterative process whereby the objective evidence of the iterations themselves are the primary quality measures.
We can apply secondary measures by assessing each of the requirements artifacts at each iteration, or at any iteration we choose, by looking at the various aspects of quality that each artifact should contain at that point in the development process.
8