assembly verification with deferent types of element with deferent types of assembly technique...

28
1. Introduction 2. Objective 3. Material property of components 4. CAD model 5. Unfold CAD model for sheet metal operation 6. Base FEA assembly model 7. Load and boundary condition 8. Displacement results for deferent types of element selection 9. Stress results for deferent types of element selection 10. Documents of max value of displacement & stress for deferent types of element selection

description

it just the fundamental methods and its verification.. the results will be taken to production with more test done in same model with different material and different analysis process which i am not aware of..

Transcript of assembly verification with deferent types of element with deferent types of assembly technique...

Page 1: assembly verification with deferent types of element with deferent types of assembly technique followed in industry.

1. Introduction2. Objective3. Material property of components4. CAD model5. Unfold CAD model for sheet metal operation6. Base FEA assembly model7. Load and boundary condition8. Displacement results for deferent types of

element selection9. Stress results for deferent types of element

selection10. Documents of max value of displacement &

stress for deferent types of element selection11. Conclusion of the presentation

Page 2: assembly verification with deferent types of element with deferent types of assembly technique followed in industry.
Page 3: assembly verification with deferent types of element with deferent types of assembly technique followed in industry.
Page 4: assembly verification with deferent types of element with deferent types of assembly technique followed in industry.
Page 5: assembly verification with deferent types of element with deferent types of assembly technique followed in industry.

Verification of FEA results by use of deferent FEA modeling methods with same element pattern and assembly method with same load and boundary condition(inertia relief) .

It is a exercise of use of deferent testing methods and what type of assembly will satisfy it in all respect.

Page 6: assembly verification with deferent types of element with deferent types of assembly technique followed in industry.

Material name

Young’s modulus

Shear modulus

Poison's ratio

density

Aluminum alloy

7.00e4 2.632e4 0.33 2.8e-9

steel 2.10e5 8.203e4 0.28 7.83e-9

Page 7: assembly verification with deferent types of element with deferent types of assembly technique followed in industry.
Page 8: assembly verification with deferent types of element with deferent types of assembly technique followed in industry.
Page 9: assembly verification with deferent types of element with deferent types of assembly technique followed in industry.
Page 10: assembly verification with deferent types of element with deferent types of assembly technique followed in industry.
Page 11: assembly verification with deferent types of element with deferent types of assembly technique followed in industry.
Page 12: assembly verification with deferent types of element with deferent types of assembly technique followed in industry.
Page 13: assembly verification with deferent types of element with deferent types of assembly technique followed in industry.
Page 14: assembly verification with deferent types of element with deferent types of assembly technique followed in industry.

Hex model of individual component is the base model

Page 15: assembly verification with deferent types of element with deferent types of assembly technique followed in industry.

Mid face of Hex model of individual component

Page 16: assembly verification with deferent types of element with deferent types of assembly technique followed in industry.

outer face of Hex model of individual component

Page 17: assembly verification with deferent types of element with deferent types of assembly technique followed in industry.

Tet model extracted by splitting of Hex model of individual component

Page 18: assembly verification with deferent types of element with deferent types of assembly technique followed in industry.
Page 19: assembly verification with deferent types of element with deferent types of assembly technique followed in industry.
Page 20: assembly verification with deferent types of element with deferent types of assembly technique followed in industry.
Page 21: assembly verification with deferent types of element with deferent types of assembly technique followed in industry.

IMAGES OF AREA HAVING HIGHER DISPLACEMENT VALUE ON LOADING CONDITION

HEX ELEMENT TET ELEMENT

SHELL ELEMENT IN OUTER FACE SHELL ELEMENT IN MID PLAN

Page 22: assembly verification with deferent types of element with deferent types of assembly technique followed in industry.

ASSEMBLY ELEMENT TYPE

NODE SHOWING MAX VALUE

VALUE AND RESULT TO BE TAKEN FOR

REVIEW

HEX MODEL 1.73E+00

TET MODEL 7.27E-01  

MID PLANE MODEL 1.81E+00  

OUTER SURFACE MODEL 1.82E+00HIGHER DISPLACEMENT

VALUE

Page 23: assembly verification with deferent types of element with deferent types of assembly technique followed in industry.
Page 24: assembly verification with deferent types of element with deferent types of assembly technique followed in industry.
Page 25: assembly verification with deferent types of element with deferent types of assembly technique followed in industry.

ASSEMBLY ELEMENT TYPE

element showing max value

VALUE AND RESULT TO BE TAKEN FOR

REVIEW

HEX MODEL 1.66E+02

TET MODEL 1.14E+02  

MID PLANE MODEL 1.89E+02  

OUTER SURFACE MODEL 1.91E+02HIGHER DISPLACEMENT

VALUE

Page 26: assembly verification with deferent types of element with deferent types of assembly technique followed in industry.
Page 27: assembly verification with deferent types of element with deferent types of assembly technique followed in industry.
Page 28: assembly verification with deferent types of element with deferent types of assembly technique followed in industry.

The objective is achieved by getting different results from assembly by use of deferent modeling methods without change of base pattern of FEA model.

Same assembly has to go for dynamic inertia relief test to gather output results variation.