ASME IX Interpretation-Part9

download ASME IX Interpretation-Part9

of 36

Transcript of ASME IX Interpretation-Part9

  • 8/16/2019 ASME IX Interpretation-Part9

    1/36

    Interpretation Detail Print to PDF

    Please limit your selection on the search results screen to 10 interpretations.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-407.4, Postweld Heat Treatment

    Date Issued: 02/28/1992

    Record Number: BC91-614

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-33

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Can a PQR conducted on a 2 in. thick base metal with notch

    toughness required and PWHT above the upper transformation temperature

     be used to support a WPS on a ½ in. thick base metal with all other essentialvariables, including notch toughness, unchanged?

    Reply: No.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-200.2(b) and QW-300.2; Manufacturer's and Contractor's

    Responsibility

    Date Issued: 12/20/1991

    Record Number: BC91-415

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-25

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question (1): According to QW-200.2(b), may a manufacturer or contractor

     provide guidelines for a procedure qualification, and a WPS, and a welder

    to a test lab, then audit on random basis and certify the procedure?

    Reply (1): No.

    Question (2): According to QW-300.2, may a manufacturer or contractor

     provide acceptance and rejection criteria, a WPS, and a welder performancefor a qualification test to a test lab then audit on a random basis and accept

    responsibility for the performance qualification test?

    Reply (2): No.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-306; Combination of Welding Process

    Date Issued: 12/20/1991

    Record Number: BC91-470

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-26

    GO TO ASME.ORG HO

    页码,1/36

    2016/5/4https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm

  • 8/16/2019 ASME IX Interpretation-Part9

    2/36

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: When a welder has been qualified using a single welding process

    and later takes a test using a combination of welding processes, which

    includes the previously qualified process, and does not pass, does this affect

    the earlier qualification?

    Reply: No.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section II, Part C, SA 5.4 - Table 4

    Date Issued: 12/20/1991

    Record Number: BC91-471

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-27

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Should the footnotes a, b, and c of Table 4 read as follows: a) See

    Section 10 and 14.2 b) See Section 11.1 and 14.3 c) See Section 11.2 and

    Figs. I and 3?

    Reply: Yes.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-281.2(f); Corrosion-Resistant Weld Metal Overlay -

    Essential Variables

    Date Issued: 12/20/1991Record Number: BC91-472

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-28

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: May a corrosion-resistant weld metal overlay procedure

    qualification test joint 2 in. in thickness that was postweld heat treated

    (PWHT) for 2 hr (1 hr per in.) qualify a PWHT of a 5 in. thick material for

    5 hr (1 hr per in.)?

    Reply: No.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IXEdition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-151.3 and QW-462.1, Tension Tests and Test Specimens

    Date Issued: 02/28/1992

    Record Number: BC91-473

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-29

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question (1): For plate coupon, welded by one process and procedure, may

    either reduced-section specimens conforming to the requirements given in

    QW-462.1(a) or turned specimens conforming to the requirements given inQW-462.1(d) be used for tension test specimens?

    Reply (1): Yes.

    页码,2/36

    2016/5/4https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm

  • 8/16/2019 ASME IX Interpretation-Part9

    3/36

    Question (2): For a 2 in. plate test coupon welded with one process and

     procedure, may two turned 0.505 tensile specimens conforming to QW-

    462.1(d) be used for each tension test?

    Reply (2): Yes.

    Question (3): In performing tension tests on a 2 in. test coupon welded with

    one process and procedure using turned specimens conforming to QW-462.1(d) and spaced in accordance with QW-151.3(b), is it acceptable if

     portions of weld deposit are not included in the tension tests?

    Reply (3): Yes.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-200.1, General Welding Procedure Qualifications

    Date Issued: 02/28/1992

    Record Number: BC91-587

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-30

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Does QW-200.1(c) require that there be a history of changes such

    as margin notes or other record documenting what specific changes were

    made in the essential, nonessential, or supplemental variables each time a

    WPS is revised?

    Reply: No.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-310, Qualification of Test Coupons

    Date Issued: 02/28/1992

    Record Number: BC91-613

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-31

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: May a welder repair the root pass from the root side of a Welder

    Performance test coupon and be qualified to weld without backing?

    Reply: No.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-351, General Welding Variables for Welders

    Date Issued: 02/28/1992

    Record Number: BC91-631

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-32

    Question(s) and Reply(ies):

    页码,3/36

    2016/5/4https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm

  • 8/16/2019 ASME IX Interpretation-Part9

    4/36

    Question: When using a single test coupon for welder performance

    qualifications, is it necessary to determine the deposited weld metal

    thickness for each process the welder uses to weld the single test coupon?

    Reply: Yes.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IXEdition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-451, Groove-Weld Procedure Qualification Thickness

    Limits and Test Specimens

    Date Issued: 02/28/1992

    Record Number: BC91-586

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-34

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question (1): Tables QW-451.1 and QW-451.2 state limits for base metal

    and deposited weld metal thickness. Where QW-250 lists variables

    applicable to thickness, do these variables supersede the limits of QW-451.1

    and QW-451.2?

    Reply (1): Yes.

    Question (2): Tables QW-451.1 .and QW-451.2 do not give a minimum

    deposited weld metal thickness. When the variable QW-403.6 states a

    minimum base metal thickness, does this minimum also apply to deposited

    weld metal?

    Reply (2): No.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-452.1, Transverse Bend Test for Performance Qualification

    Thickness Limits and Test Specimens

    Date Issued: 02/28/1992

    Record Number: BC91-277

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-35

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Even though QW-484 does not provide space for documentingconformance of the test coupon groove with the requirements of QW-452.1,

     Notes 8 or 9, does a signed Record of Welder/Welding Operator

    Performance Qualification form indicate that these requirements have been

    met?

    Reply: Yes.

     Note: However, at the present moment, QW-484 is under consideration for

     possible revision.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IXEdition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    页码,4/36

    2016/5/4https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm

  • 8/16/2019 ASME IX Interpretation-Part9

    5/36

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-452.1, Transverse Bend Test for Performance Qualification

    Thickness Limits and Test Specimens

    Date Issued: 02/28/1992

    Record Number: BC91-616

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-36

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Interpretation IX-83-90 states:

    "Question (1): Can a double-beveled plate, 1 in. thick with each beveled

    groove being ½ in., be welded by a welder qualified to weld a weld metal

    deposit of 0.864 in.?

    Reply (1): No.

    Question (2): Can the same joint as above be welded by two individual

    welders, each with a deposited weld metal qualification of 0.864 in.,

     provided each welder does not exceed 0.864 in.?

    Reply (2): Yes."

    Question: Can a double-beveled plate, 1½ in. thick with each beveled

    groove being ½ in., be welded by two individual welders, one on each side

    of the plate and each with a deposited weld metal qualification of 0.864 in.,

     provided each welder does not exceed 0.864 in.?

    Reply: Yes.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:Subject Description: Section IX, QW-151 and QW-451, Tension Test Specimens and Groove-

    Weld Procedure Qualification Thickness Limits and Test Specimens

    Date Issued: 02/28/1992

    Record Number: BC92-097

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-37

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question (1): Do paragraphs QW-151.1, QW-151.2, QW-151.3, and QW-

    151.4 define the number of tension test specimens required for each tension

    test as specified in QW-451.1 and QW-451.2?

    Reply (1): Yes.

    Question (2): Do Tables QW-451.1 and QW-451.2 specify the minimum

    required number of tension and guided bend tests needed for various groove

    welded coupons, regardless of diameter when pipe or tube is used?

    Reply (2): Yes.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-200, General Welding Procedure Qualifications

    Date Issued: 05/28/1992

    页码,5/36

    2016/5/4https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm

  • 8/16/2019 ASME IX Interpretation-Part9

    6/36

    Record Number: BC91-630

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-38

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Background: A welder was monitored while performing production welding

    and was found to be welding above the amperage range listed on the WPS

    for a specific electrode diameter (SMAW process).

    Question: Does Section IX require the WPS to be amended or requalified,as applicable, when a variable is not followed such as welding above or

     below the established amperage or voltage range listed on the WPS?

    Reply: The disposition of nonconformances is not within the scope of

    Section IX.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-300.3, Simultaneous Qualification of WeldersDate Issued: 05/28/1992

    Record Number: BC92-121

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-39

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Background: Three contractors desire to use the same WPS and

    simultaneously qualify welders in accordance with QW-300. Each

    contractor has a pre-existing PQR covering the scope of the WPS. Each

    contractor's name and corresponding PQR number is entered on the WPS

    and separate signature blocks are provided for each contractor. This method

    of weld procedure and welder performance qualification and operational

    controls is described in the QC system for each contractor.

    Question (1): May the WPS described be used to simultaneously qualify

    welders?

    Reply (1): Yes.

    Question (2): May the WPS described be used for production welding by all

    three contractors?

    Reply (2): Yes.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IXEdition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-409.1, Electrical Characteristics

    Date Issued: 05/28/1992

    Record Number: BC92-110

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-40

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question (1): When notch toughness tests are a requirement, and option

    QW-409.1(a) is chosen as a means of determining heat input, must the

    actual voltage, amperage, and travel speed used be recorded on the PQR?

    Reply (1): Yes.

    页码,6/36

    2016/5/4https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm

  • 8/16/2019 ASME IX Interpretation-Part9

    7/36

    Question (2): When notch toughness tests are a requirement, and option

    QW-409.1(b), bead size, is chosen as a means of determining heat input,

    must the actual bead width and height deposited to ascertain "Volume of

    Weld Metal" deposited be recorded on the PQR?

    Reply (2): Yes.

    Question (3): May either of the above methods be substituted for the other,when writing a WPS that has notch toughness requirements, by estimating

    the values of the "other" method [i.e., using option (a) (with estimated

    amps, volts, and travel speed) when option (b) (actual Volume of Weld

    Metal) was used when the test coupon was welded]?

    Reply (3): No.

    Question (4): When notch toughness tests are a requirement, and option

    QW-409.1(b), bead size, is chosen as a means of determining heat input,

    can any electrode diameter be used as long as the volume of deposited weld

    metal, which is recorded on the PQR, is not exceeded?

    Reply (4): Yes.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-461.9, Performance Qualifications - Position and Diameter

    Limitations

    Date Issued: 05/28/1992

    Record Number: BC92-035

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-41

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Are welders qualified on plate in 2G, 3G, and 4G positions

    qualified to weld on pipe less than 24 in. OD in the 5G position?

    Reply: No.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-200.4(a), Combination of Welding Processes

    Date Issued: 09/30/1992

    Record Number: BC92-011

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-42

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: May a single set of weld metal impact test specimens be used to

    qualify two or more processes or procedures?

    Reply: Yes, provided weld metal from each process or procedure is

    included in each specimen.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    页码,7/36

    2016/5/4https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm

  • 8/16/2019 ASME IX Interpretation-Part9

    8/36

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-492, Definition of Machine Welding

    Date Issued: 09/30/1992

    Record Number: BC92-100

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-43

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Is a GMAW spot welding process in which all variables are preset, except for placement of the nozzle against the material and

    activation of the trigger by the operator, considered machine welding?

    Reply: Yes.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-251.4 and QW-280, Special Processes

    Date Issued: 09/30/1992

    Record Number: BC92-168

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-44

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question (1): According to the 1990 Addenda of Section IX, are there any

    supplementary essential or nonessential variables required to be addressed

    in a WPS for the special processes described in QW-280?

    Reply (1): No.

    Question (2): According to the 1991 Addenda of Section IX, are there any

    supplementary essential or nonessential variables required to be addressed

    in a WPS for the special processes described in QW-251.4?

    Reply (2): No.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-303.2 and QW-452.4, Fillet Welds

    Date Issued: 09/30/1992

    Record Number: BC92-238

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-45

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: When Section IX requires separate performance qualification for

    fillet welds on small diameter pipe, does the same requirement apply to

    longitudinal fillet welds (such as the attachment of gussets in the

    longitudinal direction)?

    Reply: No.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description:

    页码,8/36

    2016/5/4https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm

  • 8/16/2019 ASME IX Interpretation-Part9

    9/36

    Section IX, QW-303.3 and QW-461.9, Special Positions for Performance

    Qualification

    Date Issued: 09/30/1992

    Record Number: BC92-265

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-46

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Is a welder who is qualified to weld groove welds in a special

    orientation also qualified to weld in the 1G position?

    Reply: Yes.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-322.2, Renewal of Qualification

    Date Issued: 09/30/1992

    Record Number: BC92-266

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-47

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: May the renewal of welder and welding operator performance

    qualification be done on production work?

    Reply: Yes.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:Subject Description: Section IX, QW-407.2, Postweld Heat Treatment

    Date Issued: 11/22/1993

    Record Number: BC93-586

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-84

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Background: A PQR was welded on a 2 in. thick P-No. 1, Gr. 2 material

    and post weld heat treated at 1150"F for six hours (3 hrs/in.) with

    supplementary essential variable requirements.

    Question: Will this PQR support a WPS for a production weld in 2 in. thick

    P-No. 1, Gr. 2 material that is PWHT at 1150°F for 2 hours (1 hr/in.)?

    Reply: Yes.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-201, Manufacturer's or Contractor's Responsibility

    Date Issued: 03/19/1996

    Record Number: BC95-482

    Interpretation Number : IX-95-27

    Question(s) and Reply(ies):

    页码,9/36

    2016/5/4https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm

  • 8/16/2019 ASME IX Interpretation-Part9

    10/36

    Question: May a subcontractor use a WPS supported by a PQR which was

    qualified by the contracting company and subsequently supplied to the

    subcontractor?

    Reply: No.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IXEdition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-403.10, Short Circuiting Mode

    Date Issued: 03/19/1996

    Record Number: BC96-002

    Interpretation Number : IX-95-28

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Are the base metal thickness restrictions for the GMAW process

    short circuiting mode stated in QW-403.10 and QW-404.32 also applicable

    to fillet weld tests, either in procedure qualifications (QW-451.3, QW-

    451.4) or in performance qualifications (QW-452.4, QW-452.5, and QW-

    452.6)?

    Reply: No.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-466, Test Jigs

    Date Issued: 09/30/1992Record Number: BC92-267

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-48

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: In determining the appropriate test jig dimensions of QW-466 to

    use for bend tests, is it permissible to use the dimensions corresponding to

    P-No. 35 material when the filler metal is a F-No. 36, even though the base

    material is other than a P-No. 35 material?

    Reply: No.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IXEdition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-466, Test Jigs

    Date Issued: 09/30/1992

    Record Number: BC92-268

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-49

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: In qualifying a welding procedure which utilizes a F-No. 36 filler

    of ER CuAl-A1 (SFA 5.7) for corrosion resistant weld metal overlay of a

    P-No. 1 carbon steel material, is the required mandrel diameter for side bend testing 4t as determined from column A of QW-466.1, QW-466.2 or

    QW-466.3?

    页码,10/36

    2016/5/4https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm

  • 8/16/2019 ASME IX Interpretation-Part9

    11/36

    Reply: Yes.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-403.6, Base MetalsDate Issued: 09/30/1992

    Record Number: BC92-217

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-50

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: If Heat Affected Zone (HAZ) notch toughness requirements are

    applicable, does QW-403.6, base metal thickness requirements, apply?

    Reply: Yes.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-451.3 and QW-462.4, Fillet Weld Test Specimens-

    Procedure, and QW-452.4, Performance Qualification Thickness Limits and

    Test Specimens

    Date Issued: 09/30/1992

    Record Number: BC92-276

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-51

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: If a welder performs a procedure qualification per QW-462.4(d)

    using 2 in. NPS pipe and passes, is he qualified for all diameters as outlinedin QW-451.3?

    Reply: No, per QW-452.4 he is qualified down to 1 in. O.D.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-462.5, Corrosion-Resistant Overlay Cladding/Hard-Facing

    Overlay, Chemical Analysis Specimen

    Date Issued: 12/14/1992

    Record Number: BC92-252

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-52

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: May only one chemical analysis specimen be removed from the

    vertical portion of a 6G positioned hard facing welded PQR coupon when

    the weld travel direction is reversed every other weld pass resulting in weld

     beads deposited in vertical-upward and vertical-downward direction?

    Reply: Yes, provided a chemical analysis represents each vertical travel

    direction.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    页码,11/36

    2016/5/4https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm

  • 8/16/2019 ASME IX Interpretation-Part9

    12/36

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-452.1, Groove Weld Procedure Qualifications Thickness

    Limits and Test Specimens

    Date Issued: 12/14/1992

    Record Number: BC92-254

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-53

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: A welder has qualified on 3 in. O.D. ½ in. wall pipe in the 1G

     position. He has also qualified on 1¼ in. O.D. 1/8 in. wall pipe in the 6G

     position. Is he qualified to weld 1¼ in. O.D. ½ in. wall in all positions?

    Reply: No.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-214.3, Corrosion-Resistant Weld Metal OverlayDate Issued: 12/14/1992

    Record Number: BC92-305

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-54

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Prior to the 1991 Addenda, did QW-214.3 address the number of

    chemical analysis tests required for Corrosion Resistant Weld Metal

    Overlay utilizing the GTAW Machine Welding Process in the 5G or 6G

     position?

    Reply: No.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-103.2, Records

    Date Issued: 12/14/1992

    Record Number: BC92-307

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-55

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Is it acceptable to satisfy the requirements of QW-103.2 for

    record maintenance, certification, and accessibility by means of anelectronic storage medium, e.g., computer database?

    Reply: Section IX does not address the media in which records are required

    to be maintained.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-451.3, Fillet Weld Tests

    Date Issued: 12/14/1992

    Record Number: BC92-308

    页码,12/36

    2016/5/4https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm

  • 8/16/2019 ASME IX Interpretation-Part9

    13/36

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-56

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: A welder performs a fillet weld procedure qualification in

    accordance with QW-451.3, which fails; therefore, neither the procedure

    nor the welder are qualified. Is it permissible for the welder to then perform

    a successful groove weld procedure qualification test and be qualified for

    grooves and fillets?

    Reply: Yes.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, 1989 Edition A91 Addenda, QW-253, QW-256, and QW-406.3,

    Maximum Interpass Temperature

    Date Issued: 12/14/1992

    Record Number: BC92-354

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-57

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: According to the 1991 Addenda of Section IX, is it permissible to

    revise a WPS by increasing interpass temperature to more than 100°F above

    that recorded on the supporting PQR when supplementary essential

    variables do not apply without requalification?

    Reply: Yes.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-364, Friction Welding

    Date Issued: 12/14/1992

    Record Number: BC92-357

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-58

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: For performance qualification, is a friction weld operator required

    to requalify for each seat size and base metal combination to be qualified to

    operate the machine?

    Reply: Yes.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-306, Combination of Welding Processes, QW-452.1 and

    QW-452.3, Performance Qualification Thickness Limits and Test

    Specimens

    Date Issued: 02/22/1993

    Record Number: BC92-206

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-59

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Background: The combination of welding processes and pipe diameters

    listed below were used for performance qualification:

    页码,13/36

    2016/5/4https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm

  • 8/16/2019 ASME IX Interpretation-Part9

    14/36

    (1) 2 in. Sch. 80 (.218) pipe with open butt using GTAW process. (2) 2 in.

    Sch. 160 (.343) pipe with consumable insert and fill pass using the GTAW

     process and the remainder welded with SMAW process. (3) 6 in. XXS

    (.864) using SMAW process with backing.

    Question: Using the combinations listed in the Background, in accordance

    with QW-306, Note 2 of QW-452.1 to determine maximum thickness

    qualified, and QW-452.3 for minimum diameter qualification, is the welderqualified to weld on unlimited thickness and diameters above 1 in., using

    either an open butt joint or a consumable insert with the root layer deposited

    with the GTAW process and the remainder deposited with the SMAW

     process?

    Reply: Yes.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-214, Corrosion-Resistant Weld Metal Overlay

    Date Issued: 02/22/1993

    Record Number: BC92-421

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-60

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: When corrosion-resistant weld metal overlay is deposited in a

     base material groove to a depth that is not included in the design

    calculations must the deposit be tested as a groove weld?

    Reply: No.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section II, Part C, SFA 5.13, Specification for Solid Surfacing Welding

    Rods and Electrodes

    Date Issued: 02/22/1993

    Record Number: BC92-422

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-61

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: May powdered filler metal be classified under Section II, Part C,SFA 5.13?

    Reply: No.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-408.2, Shielding Gas

    Date Issued: 02/22/1993

    Record Number: BC92-425

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-62

    页码,14/36

    2016/5/4https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm

  • 8/16/2019 ASME IX Interpretation-Part9

    15/36

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question (1): When changing shielding gases of a specific mixture, is it

     permissible to adjust the nominal percentage(s) of the minor component(s)

     by +/- 20% without requalifying the procedure?

    Reply (1): No.

    Question (2): In addition, when the absolute value of +/- 20% times the

    nominal percentage of a minor component is less than 1%, would it be permissible to make a +/- 1% adjustment to the gas mixture?

    Reply (2): No.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-153.1, Tensile Strength

    Date Issued: 02/22/1993

    Record Number: BC92-452

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-63

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: A welding procedure qualification test coupon is welded using

    P-No. 23, SB-209, alloy 6061 aluminum base material in the ("o") temper.

    After welding the test coupon, it is subjected to a "T-6" heat treatment. To

    establish acceptability of tensile tests per QW-153.1, may the tensile

    requirements of QW-422 for SB-209, alloy 6061 (T4 and T6 tempers in the

    welded condition) be used?

    Reply: No.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-322, Expiration and Renewal of Qualification

    Date Issued: 05/26/1993

    Record Number: BC92-464

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-64

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Background: A welding operator is in. the process of renewing his/her

    qualification using machine GTAW welding equipment. During the processthe machine malfunctions and burns through the root pass of the test

    coupon. No operator error is noted. Following the malfunction, the test

    coupon is repaired using a manual GTAW process. After the repair the

    machine welding equipment is used to complete the rest of the test coupon.

    Question: May a welding operator performance test coupon being welded

    for qualification or renewal be repaired prior to testing using a manual

    welding procedure?

    Reply: No.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    页码,15/36

    2016/5/4https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm

  • 8/16/2019 ASME IX Interpretation-Part9

    16/36

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-423.1, Alternate Base Metals for Welder Qualification

    Date Issued: 05/26/1993

    Record Number: BC93-148

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-65

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: In QW-423.1, is P-No. 42 included in P-No. 4X?

    Reply: Yes.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-201, Manufacturer's or Contractor's Responsibility

    Date Issued: 05/26/1993

    Record Number: BC93-377Interpretation Number : IX-92-66

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Background: Company A and Company B merge divisions to form a new

    Company, C.

    Question (1): May the new Company, C, use PQRs and WPSs developed

     previously by Company A and Company B?

    Reply (1): Yes, provided operational control is in accordance with QW-201.

    Question (2): May the new Company, C, use the central materials

    laboratory of Company A to develop WPSs and PQRs?

    Reply (2): Yes, provided operational control is in accordance with QW-201.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-201, Manufacturer's or Contractor's Responsibility

    Date Issued: 05/26/1993

    Record Number: BC93-391

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-67

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: In a contract involving piping construction work, our company

    subcontracted the piping prefabrication work to a subcontractor. This

    subcontractor is managed by our company but has a different name. The

    subcontractor proceeded to qualify welding procedures which were

    conducted in the presence and with the approval of our company's welding

    engineer who monitored the welding of the test coupons and signed

    approval on the PQRs. The Quality Control System of the subcontractor and

    our company fully describe the operational control of procedure

    qualifications. Was our client right in rejecting the use by our company of

    the subcontractor qualified welding procedures for the erection work of the

     prefabricated piping?

    Reply: This is a contractual issue, which ASME does not address.

    页码,16/36

    2016/5/4https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm

  • 8/16/2019 ASME IX Interpretation-Part9

    17/36

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-306, Combination of Welding Processes, and QW-451,

    Groove Weld Procedure Qualification Thickness Limits and Test

    Specimens

    Date Issued: 06/30/1993

    Record Number: BC92-011A

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-68

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: In using a single set of test specimens to qualify two or more

     processes or procedures, does Section IX specify a minimum weld deposit

    thickness to be included in each test specimen from each of the processes or

     procedures?

    Reply: No.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-409.1, Electrical Characteristics

    Date Issued: 06/30/1993

    Record Number: BC92-011B, BC92-228, BC92-353

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-69

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Is it the intent of QW-409.1 that the heat input, to be recorded on

    the PQR, be calculated based on the parameters used at the location wherethe impact specimens were removed?

    Reply: Yes.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-403.5, Base Metals

    Date Issued: 09/22/1993

    Record Number: BC92-450

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-70

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question (1): When a procedure qualification with supplemental notch

    toughness requirement is conducted with one P-Number material having

    multiple certifications in different Group Numbers, are WPSs qualified for

    all combinations of the Group Numbers?

    Reply (1): Yes.

    Question (2): In the above question, does one set of HAZ impact specimens,

    when required, satisfy the requirements of Section IX?

    Reply (2): Yes.

    页码,17/36

    2016/5/4https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm

  • 8/16/2019 ASME IX Interpretation-Part9

    18/36

    Question (3): When a procedure qualification with supplemental notch

    toughness requirements is conducted with two materials of different

    P-Numbers each having multiple certifications in different Group Numbers,

    are WPSs qualified for all combination of the multiple certified Group

     Numbers of the first P-Number material to the multiple certified Group

     Numbers of the second P-Number material?

    Reply (3): Yes.

    Question (4): In the above question, does one set of HAZ impact specimens

    from each P-Number material, when required, satisfy the requirements of

    Section IX?

    Reply (4): Yes.

    Question (5): In Question (3), are materials from the multiple certified

    Group Numbers qualified for welding a P-Number material to itself?

    Reply (5): No.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-302.4, Visual Examination

    Date Issued: 09/22/1993

    Record Number: BC93-365

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-71

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Are welders or welding operators qualified in accordance with

    Section IX prior to the 1992 addenda, for which the results of visualexamination required by QW-302.4 were not documented on the WPQ,

    required to requalify in order that visual examination results may be

    documented?

    Reply: No.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-381(c), Corrosion Resistant Weld Metal Overlay, QW-453and QW-461.9, Performance Qualification

    Date Issued: 09/22/1993

    Record Number: BC93-392

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-72

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question (1): May welder qualifications for corrosion-resistant overlays per

    QW-381 and QW-453 be made on plate, when qualifying for welding on

     pipe/tubes parallel to the axis of the pipe/ tubes?

    Reply (1): Yes.

    Question (2)(a): Should the side bends required in QW-453 consist of the

     base metal plus overlay thickness, after surface conditioning per Note 4 of

    QW-453?

    页码,18/36

    2016/5/4https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm

  • 8/16/2019 ASME IX Interpretation-Part9

    19/36

    Question (2)(b): When the overlay test specimens are less than 3/8 in. thick,

    may the side bend specimen width be the test specimen thickness?

    Question (2)(c): May the edges of the overlay be outside of the bent area as

    long as at least a 1-1/2 in. width of overlay and HAZ are completely within

    the bend?

    Reply (2)(a): Yes.

    Reply (2)(b): Yes.

    Reply (2)(c): Yes.

    Question (3): May QW-461.9 Groove-Pipe be used for the position essential

    variable rules for welder qualifications on corrosion-resistant overlap?

    Reply (3): Yes.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-321.3, Welder Qualification After Further Training or

    Practice

    Date Issued: 09/22/1993

    Record Number: BC93-468

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-73

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Background: A welder performance qualification test plate fails to meet the

    radiographic requirements for qualification. After further training a new

     performance qualification test plate is welded.

    Question: May the new test plate be evaluated by bend testing?

    Reply: Yes.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QB-402.1, Base Metals

    Date Issued: 09/22/1993

    Record Number: BC93-474

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-74

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: When brazing material used for a procedure qualification test is

    not listed in QB-422 or Appendix C, but is similar to P-No. 107 or S-No.

    107 materials listed in QB-422 or Appendix C, may this material be

    considered as a P-No. 107 or S-No. 107 material in accordance with QB-

    402.1?

    Reply: No.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    页码,19/36

    2016/5/4https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm

  • 8/16/2019 ASME IX Interpretation-Part9

    20/36

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-200.4(b), Combination of Welding Procedures

    Date Issued: 09/22/1993

    Record Number: BC93-490

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-75

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: When writing multi-process welding procedures per QW-200.4(a), where the tube wall thickness is less than 1 in., using a separate

    qualification for the root deposit only, must the root deposit qualification

    coupon be 1/2 in. minimum thickness as stated in QW-200.4(b)?

    Reply: No.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-462, Test SpecimensDate Issued: 09/22/1993

    Record Number: BC93-515

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-76

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: QW-462 defines W as "specimen width, 3/4 in." Is 3/4 in. a

    minimum or maximum dimension requirement for preparing a reduced

    section tensile specimen?

    Reply: No.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-200.4, Combination of Welding Procedures, and QW-

    451.4, Fillet Welds Qualified by Groove Weld Tests

    Date Issued: 09/22/1993

    Record Number: BC93-518

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-77

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Background: A butt welding procedure qualification was completed on a

     pipe with E6010 electrode (F-No. 3) for the root pass and E7018 electrode(F-No. 4) for the remaining process. Question (1): Will the above procedure

    qualification alone support a WPS to make a fillet weld with E-7018

    electrodes (F-No.4) for all the passes for all fillet sizes on all base metal

    thicknesses when all the other essential variables under QW-253, SMAW

     process, are the same?

    Reply (1): Yes.

    Question (2): Will the above procedure qualification alone support a WPS

    to make a butt weld with E-7018 electrodes (F-No. 4) for all the passes

    including the root pass within the limits of qualification of QW-451.1 and

    within the limits of the essential variables under QW-253, SMAW process?

    Reply (2): Yes.

    页码,20/36

    2016/5/4https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm

  • 8/16/2019 ASME IX Interpretation-Part9

    21/36

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-200.2(b), Welding Procedure Qualifications

    Date Issued: 09/22/1993

    Record Number: BC93-561

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-78

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question (1): May a company subcontract weld procedure development and

    qualification including certification of the PQR without a company

    representative present to witness the welding, testing, and certification?

    Reply (1): No.

    Question (2): May a company subcontract weld procedure development and

    qualification including certification of the PQR with a company

    representative present to witness the welding, testing, and certification?

    Reply (2): No.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX - 1989 Edition, Addenda 91; QW-151.1, Tension Tests, Reduced

    Section-Plate, and QW-462.1(a), Test Specimens

    Date Issued: 09/22/1993

    Record Number: BC93-583Interpretation Number : IX-92-79

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question (1): Is it permissible to reduce a plate test coupon thickness

     beyond removing the reinforcement to allow for parallel surfaces?

    Reply (1): Yes.

    Question (2): What percentage of the thickness is permissible to be removed

    for procedure qualification?

    Reply (2): The minimum necessary to obtain parallel surfaces.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-103, Responsibility, and QW-201, Manufacturer's or

    Contractor's Responsibility

    Date Issued: 09/22/1993

    Record Number: BC93-584

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-80

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: When a company changes names during the course of time mustall the historical documents such as PQRs and WPQs be revised to show

    this new name?

    页码,21/36

    2016/5/4https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm

  • 8/16/2019 ASME IX Interpretation-Part9

    22/36

    Reply: No, provided there is documented traceability from the new

    company name to the WPSs and PQRs qualified under the old company

    name.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-103.1 and QW-201, Manufacturer's or Contractor's

    Responsibility

    Date Issued: 10/18/1993

    Record Number: BC92-306

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-81

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question (1): According to Section IX, para. QW-201, is it permissible for a

    manufacturer or contractor to have the welding of the test weldments

     performed by another organization?

    Reply (1): No.

    Question (2): According to para. QW-201, is it permissible to subcontract

    the work preparation of test metal for welding and subsequent work on

     preparation of test specimens from the completed weldment, performance

    of nondestructive examination, and mechanical test, provided that the

    manufacturer or contractor accepts the responsibility for any such work?

    Reply (2): Yes.

    Question (3): If the manufacturer or contractor writes the WPS and the

    welder used to produce weldments to be tested for qualification of

     procedures are under full supervision and control of a representative of themanufacturer or contractor during the production of these test weldments,

    may the welder be an employee of another organization?

    Reply (3): No.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, Code Case 2141, Electrodes and Fluxes for Submerged Arc

    Welding, SFA 5.17 and SFA 5.23

    Date Issued: 11/22/1993

    Record Number: BC93-434

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-82

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question (1): Does the "Manufacturer's Data Report" in the Section IX

    Code Case 2141 mean the following: (a) Manufacturer's Data Report

    required in PG-112 of SC I; (b) Data Report required in NCA-3770 of

    Section III; (c) Data Report required in UG-120 of Section VIII, Div. 2; or

    (d) Manufacturer's Data Reports required in AS-300 of Section VIII, Div.

    2?

    Reply (1): A Manufacturer's Data Report form is any data report form that

    is required in an ASME Code Book.

    页码,22/36

    2016/5/4https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm

  • 8/16/2019 ASME IX Interpretation-Part9

    23/36

    Question (2): Is it required to described this Code Case number on

     procurement and/or manufacturer's specifications and certified material test

    report of welding consumables?

    Reply (2): Section IX does not address procurement and manufacturer's

    specifications.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QB-415, Brazing Variables

    Date Issued: 11/22/1993

    Record Number: BC93-527

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-83

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question (1): Does ASME Section IX permit braze welding qualifications

    using the rules of Part QW, Welding?

    Reply (1): Yes.

    Question (2): May a fabricator qualify hard-facing using the brazing

    variables listed in QB-415?

    Reply (2): No.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:Subject Description: Section IX, QB-121 and QB-123, Brazing Test Positions

    Date Issued: 11/22/1993

    Record Number: BC93-655

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-85

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: If the test material is oriented at 15 deg. above horizontal (i.e., 75

    deg. down from vertical) and the brazing filler metal flows upward by

    capillary action through the joint, would the brazer then be qualified for

     both the flat-flow and vertical-upflow positions?

    Reply: No.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-100.3, Welding General Requirements

    Date Issued: 11/22/1993

    Record Number: BC93-658

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-86

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: May a hard-facing procedure qualification test that was

     performed in 1990 on a 1 in. thick test coupon and is used to support a

    页码,23/36

    2016/5/4https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm

  • 8/16/2019 ASME IX Interpretation-Part9

    24/36

    welding procedure specification written in 1993 be used to deposit a hard-

    facing overlay on base material 1 in. to unlimited thickness?

    Reply: Yes. QW-100.3 allows welding procedure specification (WPS) to be

    supported by procedure qualifications accomplished subsequent to 1962

    without amending the WPS to include any variables required by later

    Editions and Addenda.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-403.6, Base Metals and QW-409.1, Electrical

    Characteristics

    Date Issued: 02/14/1994

    Record Number: BC93-151

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-87

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Background: Two PQRs have been qualified to support a WPS with notch

    toughness requirements and having a qualified base metal thickness range

    from 5/16 in. to 2 in. inclusive. One PQR was qualified on 1 in. thick

    material with a maximum heat input of 85,000 J/in. The second was

    qualified on 5/16 in. thick material with a maximum heat input of 45,000

    J/in. All other essential and supplementary essential variables are the same.

    Question (1): Is this WPS qualified for using 85,000 J/in. max. heat input on

    thicknesses 5/16 in. to 2 in.?

    Reply (1): No.

    Question (2): Is the heat input value of 85,000 J/in. applicable to base metalthicknesses between 5/8 in. to 2 in. and the heat input value of 45,000 J/in.

    applicable to base metal thicknesses between 5/16 in. and 5/8 in.?

    Reply (2): Yes.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-409.1 and QW-409.8, Electrical Characteristics

    Date Issued: 02/14/1994

    Record Number: BC93-593

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-88

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Section IX, QW-409.8 and QW-409.1, require that the volts and

    amps be specified in the WPS. Does Section IX require voltage to be

    measured at a specific location in the welding circuit or the current to be

    measured using a specific type of meter (RMS, averaging or other type)?

    Reply: No.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    页码,24/36

    2016/5/4https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm

  • 8/16/2019 ASME IX Interpretation-Part9

    25/36

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-452.1, Groove Weld Procedure Qualification Thickness

    Limits and Test Specimens and QW-452.3, Groove Weld Diameter Limits

    Date Issued: 02/14/1994

    Record Number: BC93-653

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-89

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: A welder has qualified on 3 in. O.D. 1/2 in. wall pipe in the 1G

     position and has also qualified on 1 in. O.D. 1/8 in. wall pipe in the 1G

     position. Is the welder qualified to weld 1 in. O.D. 3/8 in. wall in the 1G

     position?

    Reply: Yes.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-461.9; Performance Qualification Position and Diameter

    Limitations

    Date Issued: 02/14/1994

    Record Number: BC93-753

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-90

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: A welder has passed two separate tests; one on 5/8 in. O.D. by

    0.049 in. thick pipe welded in the 6G position using GTAW process, and

    another on 1/2 in. thick plate welded in the 1G position using GTAW

     process. Do these two tests in combination qualify the welder to weld pipe

    of unlimited diameter in all positions up to 1 in. thick using GTAW?

    Reply: No.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-300, General Welding Performance Qualifications

    Date Issued: 02/14/1994

    Record Number: BC93-755

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-91

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Does Section IX prohibit making editorial corrections to welder

    and welding operator performance qualification records?

    Reply: No.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-201, Manufacturer's or Contractor's Responsibility,Clarification Request to Interpretation IX-92-07 Date Issued Oct. 7, 1991,

    File BC91-156

    页码,25/36

    2016/5/4https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm

  • 8/16/2019 ASME IX Interpretation-Part9

    26/36

    Date Issued: 05/20/1994

    Record Number: BC93-678

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-92

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question (1): Is the term "Organization" as stated in QW-201 and

    "Company A" in Interpretation IX-92-07 one and the same?

    Reply (1): No.

    Background: Two companies are contracted by a client company to

    undertake pipe work installation on its facility. All stages of the Welding

    Procedure Qualification Processes for the two contracted companies are

    witnessed by the client companies representative and the documentation

    duly stamped and signed as accepted by the client.

    Question (2): May these procedures be used by the client company?

    Reply (2): No.

    Question (3): Does the client company have to requalify these procedures inorder to perform in-house maintenance at a later date using all the same

    essential and nonessential variables with its own qualified welders?

    Reply (3): Yes.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QB-402.1, Brazing Data and Appendix C - Nonmandatory

    S-NumbersDate Issued: 05/20/1994

    Record Number: BC93-752

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-93

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question (1): Does the brazing procedure qualification test with a base

    metal assigned one S-Number, or S-Number plus Group-Number, qualify

    for all other base metals in the same S-Number grouping?

    Reply (1): Yes.

    Question (2): Does the brazing procedure qualification test with dissimilar

    metals using one metal listed in one S-Number to one specific metal notlisted in one S or P-Number qualify for the brazing of all other base metals

    in the same S-Number to themselves and to the specific base metal without

    S or P-Number?

    Reply (2): Yes.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section II, Part C, SFA-5.8

    Date Issued: 05/20/1994

    Record Number: BC93-754

    页码,26/36

    2016/5/4https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm

  • 8/16/2019 ASME IX Interpretation-Part9

    27/36

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-94

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: May AWS Classification BAg-34 be considered SFA-5.8 filler

    metal even though it does not appear in the 1992 ASME Boiler and Pressure

    Vessel Code Section II, Part C (including the 1992 Addenda)?

    Reply: Yes.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-200, General Welding Procedure Qualifications

    Date Issued: 05/20/1994

    Record Number: BC94-008

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-95

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: May a single WPS be qualified both with PWHT and without

    PWHT (two PQRs), thereby allowing the WPS to be used with or withoutPWHT?

    Reply: Yes.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-300, General Welding Performance Qualifications

    Date Issued: 05/20/1994

    Record Number: BC94-102

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-96

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Background: A welder is qualified on a NPS 2 Sch. 40 pipe test coupon

    using GTAW 1.6 mm deposited weld metal and SMAW 2.4 mm deposited

    weld metal.

    Question (1): Is the SMAW portion of the performance qualification

    considered welding with backing?

    Reply (1): Yes.

    Question (2): Is the welder qualified to weld NPS 4 single welded grooveweld without backing using the SMAW process only?

    Reply (2): No.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-200.4(a), Combination of Welding Procedures

    Date Issued: 05/20/1994

    Record Number: BC94-167

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-97

    页码,27/36

    2016/5/4https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm

  • 8/16/2019 ASME IX Interpretation-Part9

    28/36

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: According to QW-200.4(a), when a qualified WPS for a

    combination process is available, must a new WPS be generated if only one

    of the processes is to be used in production, provided all requirements of

    Section IX for the process used are met?

    Reply: No.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, Appendix C, Nonmandatory S-Numbers

    Date Issued: 05/20/1994

    Record Number: BC94-236

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-98

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: May steel produced to ASTM A-108 Grade 1018, UNS G10180,

     be considered S-1 material?

    Reply: Yes.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-432.6, F-Numbers and Section II, Part C, SFA-5.29, 1992

    Addenda

    Date Issued: 06/10/1994

    Record Number: BC93-762 and BC93-769

    Interpretation Number : IX-92-99

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: May AWS 5.24 ER Zr4 be considered as an F-No. 61 filler

    metal?

    Reply: Yes.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:Subject Description: Section IX, QW-200.1(b), General Welding Procedure Qualifications and

    QW-402.4, Joints

    Date Issued: 09/21/1994

    Record Number: BC94-104

    Interpretation Number : IX-95-01

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: If a WPS states that the GTAW process shall be used on root and

    second pass of open root or metal backed groove joints and the SMAW

     process shall be used on the remainder of the groove joint, is it necessary to

    state that the SMAW portion of the WPS must be performed with backing

    (i.e., the GTAW process)?

    Reply: No.

    页码,28/36

    2016/5/4https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm

  • 8/16/2019 ASME IX Interpretation-Part9

    29/36

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-462, Test Specimens

    Date Issued: 09/21/1994

    Record Number: BC94-181

    Interpretation Number : IX-95-02

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: What are the minimum and maximum tolerances for specimens

    shown in QW-462, where the figures show "approximate" dimensions?

    Reply: As stated in the Foreword, "The Code does not fully address

    tolerances. When dimensions, sizes, or other parameters are not specified

    with tolerances, the values of these parameters are considered nominal and

    allowable tolerance or local variances may be considered acceptable when

     based on engineering judgment and standard practices as determined by the

    designer."

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-202.2(b), Groove and Fillet Weld Tests and QW-202.3(b),

    Weld Repair and Buildup Tests

    Date Issued: 09/21/1994

    Record Number: BC94-235

    Interpretation Number : IX-95-03

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Background: Procedure Qualification was performed by making a full

     penetration weld on 1½ in. thick plate. Paragraph QW-202.2(b) states that

    qualification on 1½ in. or thicker base metal qualifies for making partial

     penetration welds on base metals with no upper limit of base metal

    thickness. No minimum thickness of base metal is addressed.

    Question (1): Does qualification of 1½ in. thick base metal qualify for

    making partial penetration groove welds on base metals which are less than

    3/16 in. thick?

    Reply (1): No. See para. QW-451.1 for minimum base metal thicknesses.

    Background: Procedure qualification was performed by making a full penetration weld on 1½ in. thick plate. Paragraph QW-202.3(b) states that

    qualification on 1½ in. thick or thicker base metal qualifies for making weld

    repairs or weld build-ups on base metals of unlimited thickness.

    Question (2): Does qualification on 1½ in. base metal qualify for making

    weld repairs or weld build-ups on base metals which are less than 3/16 in.

    thick?

    Reply (2): No. See para. QW-451.1 for minimum base metal thicknesses.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IXEdition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    页码,29/36

    2016/5/4https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm

  • 8/16/2019 ASME IX Interpretation-Part9

    30/36

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-452.3, Groove Weld Diameter Limits and Submerged Arc

    Wire Flux Combination

    Date Issued: 09/21/1994

    Record Number: BC94-296

    Interpretation Number : IX-95-04

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question (1): According to para. QW-452.3 is the inside diameter an

    essential variable for performance qualification?

    Reply (1): No.

    Background: A WPS for SAW process was qualified with a wire flux

    combination classified as F6P0-EL8, using one trade name for flux. This

    WPS was in use for several years. Now the flux manufacturer has changed

    the classification to F7P2-EL8 without changing the trade name of flux. The

    flux trade name is mentioned on the WPS and PQR along with the former

    AWS classification.

    Question (2): Is it required to requalify this WPS due to the change in the

    AWS class of the wire flux combination by the flux manufacturer withoutchanging its Trade Name?

    Reply (2): Yes. See para. QW-404.9(a).

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-422, P-Numbers

    Date Issued: 09/21/1994Record Number: BC94-365

    Interpretation Number : IX-95-05

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: May SB-564 UNS N08825 be considered as P-No. 45, since it

    has identical properties to SB-425 UNS N08825 that is assigned P-No. 45 in

    QW-422?

    Reply: No.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-153.1, Tension Tests

    Date Issued: 09/21/1994

    Record Number: BC94-542

    Interpretation Number : IX-95-06

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: If a tensile specimen breaks in the weld metal, below the weld

    metal's minimum specified tensile requirement, but not below the minimum

    tensile strength specified for the base metal, is the PQR considered

    acceptable?

    Reply: Yes.

    页码,30/36

    2016/5/4https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm

  • 8/16/2019 ASME IX Interpretation-Part9

    31/36

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-420.2, S-Numbers

    Date Issued: 03/17/1995

    Record Number: BC94-522Interpretation Number : IX-95-07

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: When qualifying a welding procedure using S1 group 2 for API

    5LX60 pipe joining to MSS SP-75 or ASTM A860 WPHY-65 fittings, or

    when joining WPHY-60 fittings to each other, is it permissible to use the

    corresponding S-Number for the fitting as the same grade of high strength

     pipe when the physical properties are similar?

    Reply: No.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-462.4(a), Fillet Weld Procedure

    Date Issued: 03/17/1995

    Record Number: BC94-543

    Interpretation Number : IX-95-08

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question (1): When T2 is greater than 3/4 in. in Fig. QW-462.4(a), what is

    the maximum size fillet weld required?

    Reply (1): 3/4 in.

    Question (2): In QW-462.4(a), what does "size of fillet = thickness of T2"

    mean?

    Reply (2): The length of each fillet leg(s) shall be nominally equal to the

    thickness of T2.

    Question (3): Is there a tolerance for the fillet leg size?

    Reply (3): No. As stated in the 1992 Addenda to the Foreword, when

    tolerances are not specified, dimensions are considered nominal and

    allowable tolerances or local variances may be considered acceptable when based on engineering judgement and standard practices as determined by

    the designer.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-153, Acceptance Criteria--Tension Tests

    Date Issued: 03/17/1995

    Record Number: BC94-570Interpretation Number : IX-95-09

    Question(s) and Reply(ies):

    页码,31/36

    2016/5/4https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm

  • 8/16/2019 ASME IX Interpretation-Part9

    32/36

    Question: When welds between base metals of different minimum specified

    tensile strengths are being tested and tensile failure occurs in either of the

     base metals, does the reference to base metal within QW-153.1(d) mean the

     base metal with the lower minimum specified tensile strength?

    Reply: Yes.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-200.4, Combination of Welding Procedures

    Date Issued: 03/17/1995

    Record Number: BC94-662

    Interpretation Number : IX-95-10

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: May a single process WPS be qualified by a combination process

    PQR where no essential variables for the process are changed?

    Reply: Yes.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-408, Gas

    Date Issued: 03/17/1995

    Record Number: BC95-002

    Interpretation Number : IX-95-11

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Is it required to indicate the purity level by percent composition

    or descriptive terms of a single shielding gas on the WPS and on the PQR?

    Reply: No.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-202.4, Dissimilar Base Metal ThicknessesDate Issued: 03/17/1995

    Record Number: BC95-027

    Interpretation Number : IX-95-12

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Does QW-202.4 include butt joints and corner joints when

     joining dissimilar base metal thicknesses when prepared with a groove?

    Reply: Yes.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    页码,32/36

    2016/5/4https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm

  • 8/16/2019 ASME IX Interpretation-Part9

    33/36

    Subject Description: Section IX, 1989 Addenda, QW-203, Limits of Qualified Positions for

    Procedures Section II Part C, 1989 Addenda, SFA 5.1 and 5.5

    Date Issued: 06/15/1995

    Record Number: BC94-035

    Interpretation Number : IX-95-13

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Do the requirements for classification of filler metals in

    accordance with ASME Section II Part C apply to the qualification of

    welding and brazing procedures in accordance with Section IX?

    Reply: No.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-300.3, Welding Performance Qualifications

    Date Issued: 06/15/1995Record Number: BC95-040

    Interpretation Number : IX-95-14

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Are there any circumstances under which a non-employee person

    or organization can represent one or more participating organizations during

    welding of the test coupon in accordance with the requirements of QW-

    300.3?

    Reply: No.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IXEdition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-160, Guided-Bend Tests and QW-466 Note (b)- Test Jigs

    Date Issued: 06/15/1995

    Record Number: BC95-094

    Interpretation Number : IX-95-15

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Is it acceptable to measure the percent elongation of the tensile

    specimens in lieu of bend specimens to measure the ductility for welding

     procedure qualification acceptance?

    Reply: No.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-255, Welding Variables Procedure Specifications for

    FCAW and QW- 408.2, Gas

    Date Issued: 06/15/1995

    Record Number: BC95-095

    Interpretation Number : IX-95-16

    页码,33/36

    2016/5/4https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm

  • 8/16/2019 ASME IX Interpretation-Part9

    34/36

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: May a FCAW welding procedure qualified without shielding gas,

     be used with a shielding gas without requalification?

    Reply: No.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-302.4, Visual Examination

    Date Issued: 10/19/1995

    Record Number: BC95-035

    Interpretation Number : IX-95-17

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question (1): For the fillet weld coupon in welder performance

    qualification, does the macro examination required per QW-452.5 exempt

    the visual examination required per QW-302.4?

    Reply (1): No.

    Question (2): Does the visual examination of the fillet weld test coupon

    required per QW-302.4 refer to the final weld face side only?

    Reply (2): Yes.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-409.8, Electrical Characteristics

    Date Issued: 10/19/1995

    Record Number: BC95-220

    Interpretation Number : IX-95-18

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Does Section IX require that a separate amperage range be

    specified for each filler metal size listed in the WPS?

    Reply: No.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-300.3, Welding Performance Qualifications and QW-322.1

    (b), Expiration of Welder Qualification

    Date Issued: 10/19/1995

    Record Number: BC95-221

    Interpretation Number : IX-95-19

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Background: A welder simultaneously qualifies for ten different contractors

    in accordance with QW-300.3. QW-300.3 requires the contractor that

    rejects a welder to notify the other contractors who participated in the

    simultaneous test that the welder's qualification has been revoked. One of

    the contractors subsequently revokes the welder's qualification for specific

    页码,34/36

    2016/5/4https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm

  • 8/16/2019 ASME IX Interpretation-Part9

    35/36

    reason in accordance with QW-322.1(b). Question (1): Are the other nine

    contractors who qualified the welder simultaneously required to revoke the

    welder's qualification per QW-322.1(b)?

    Reply (1): No.

    Question (2): When a participating contractor revokes a welder's

    qualification for specific reason, does QW-300.3 require the other participating contractors to retest the welder or welding operator?

    Reply (2): No.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-300, Welding Performance Qualification

    Date Issued: 10/19/1995

    Record Number: BC95-302

    Interpretation Number : IX-95-20

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: If the manufacturer or contractor writes the WPS and the welder

    used to produce the weldments to be tested for qualification of procedures is

    under the full supervision and control of the manufacturer or contractor

    during the production of these test weldments, may the welder be a

    contracted employee, provided the Quality Control system or Quality

    Assurance Program of the manufacturer or contractor describes the control

    of contracted welders?

    Reply: Yes.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-403.5, Base Metals

    Date Issued: 10/19/1995

    Record Number: BC95-318

    Interpretation Number : IX-95-21

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Background: A PQR is qualified in accordance with Section IX, withsupplementary essential variables, using a material from British Standard

    1501-224-490A-LT50.

    Question: May this PQR be used to support a WPS utilizing a P-Number 1,

    Group Number 2 material with supplementary essential variables?

    Reply: No.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-424, Base Metals Used for Procedure Qualification

    页码,35/36

    2016/5/4https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm

  • 8/16/2019 ASME IX Interpretation-Part9

    36/36

    Date Issued: 12/28/1995

    Record Number: BC95-251

    Interpretation Number : IX-95-22

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Does a procedure qualification using an unassigned metal to an

    assigned P-numbered metal qualify for welding the base metals to

    themselves using all the nonessential, essential, and supplementary essential

    variables qualified?

    Reply: No.

    Standard Designation: BPV Section IX

    Edition/Addenda:

    Para./Fig./Table No:

    Subject Description: Section IX, QW-453 Notes (3) and (10), Thickness Limits and Test

    Specimens for Hard-Facing and Corrosion-Resistant Overlays

    Date Issued: 12/28/1995

    Record Number: BC95-428

    Interpretation Number : IX-95-23

    Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question (1): Notes (3) and (10) of QW-453 require a liquid penetrant

    examination of the surface of the test coupon for hardfacing procedure and

     performance qualifications respectively. May the acceptance standards of

    QW-195.2 or other standards deemed appropriate by the qualifying

    organization be used as acceptance criteria?

    Reply (1): Yes.

    Question (2): Must the acceptance criteria be specified on the WPS?

    Reply (2): Yes.

    Copyright © 2016 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. No reproduction may be made of this material without

    written consent of ASME

    页码,36/36