AS MATHS (High Grades) for 2007 and 2006
description
Transcript of AS MATHS (High Grades) for 2007 and 2006
AS MATHS (High Grades) for 2007 and
2006 2007 2006
AS Maths 18 57 31.6% 12 34 35.2
%
AS MATHS (High Grades) for 2007 and
2006 2007 2006
AS Maths 18 57 31.6% 12 34 35.2
%AS
Mechanics
5 9 55.6%
AS Statistic
s13 48 27.1%
AS MATHS (High Grades) for 2007 and 2006
2007 2006
AS Maths 18 57 31.6% 12 34 35.2%
AS Mechanics 5 9 55.6% 6 11 54.5%
AS Statistics 13 48 27.1% 6 23 26.1%
LEICS COUNTY CRICKET2010/11 BATTING
AVERAGES
Runs Outs Batting Average
Runs Outs Batting Average
Jigar Naik
301 9 33.4 545 25 21.8
Tom New
746 23 32.4 412 19 21.7
2010 2011
LEICS COUNTY CRICKET2010/11 BATTING
AVERAGESRuns Outs Batting
AverageRuns Outs Batting
Average
Jigar Naik 301 9 33.4 545 25 21.8
Tom New 746 23 32.4 412 19 21.7
2010 and 2011 combinedRuns Outs Batting
Average
Jigar Naik
846 34 24.9
Tom New
1158 42 27.6
Simpson’s Paradox
a p c r a + c p + r> a n d > bu t <
b q d s b + d q + s
AS Results
Batting Averages
Another Example
1 3 1 1 2 4> a n d bu t <
2 7 5 6 7 13
18 12 5 6 13 6< bu t a n d >
57 34 9 11 48 23
301 746 545 412 846 1158> a n d bu t <
9 23 25 19 34 42
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1
2
3
4
x
y
2 4
7 13
1 3
2 7
1 1
5 6
1 3 1 1 2 4> a n d bu t <
2 7 5 6 7 13
E.H.Simpson “The interpretation of interaction in
contingency tables” (1951)
Karl Pearson (1899)
“Impossible” by Julian Havil
Alan Crowe – Simpson’s Paradox
You Tube – Simpson’s Paradox
Interesting Fact!
The probability that Simpson’s Paradox
will apply within any 2x2 contingency table
is 1/60.
Which batsman was better?
Did my AS Maths results really improve?