Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic...
Transcript of Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic...
![Page 1: Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systemsbrl.ee.washington.edu/eprints/222/1/Rep162.pdfArtificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022011902/5f0ac5d47e708231d42d44a9/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford - 1
Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems
Glenn K. Klute1,2, Joseph M. Czerniecki1,3, and Blake Hannaford2
1Dept. of Veterans Affairs, Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA 98108
2Dept. of Electrical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195
3Dept. of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195
Keywords: Robotics, Biomechanics, Muscles, Tendons.
ABSTRACT
Biorobotic research seeks to develop new robotic technologies modeled after the performance of
human and animal neuromuscular systems. The development of one component of a biorobotic
system, an artificial muscle and tendon, is reported here. The device is based on known static and
dynamic properties of biological muscle and tendon that were extracted from the literature and used to
mathematically describe their force, length, and velocity relationships. A flexible pneumatic actuator
is proposed as the contractile element of the artificial muscle and experimental results are presented
that show the force-length properties of the actuator are muscle-like, but the force-velocity properties
are not. The addition of a hydraulic damper is proposed to improve the actuator’s velocity-dependent
properties. Further, an artificial tendon is proposed whose function is to serve as connective tissue
between the artificial muscle and a skeletal structure. A complete model of the artificial muscle-
tendon system is then presented which predicts the expected force-length-velocity performance of the
artificial system. Experimental results of the constructed device indicate muscle-like performance in
general: higher activation pressures yielded higher output forces, faster concentric contractions resulted
in lower force outputs, faster eccentric contractions produced higher force outputs, and output forces
were higher at longer muscle lengths than shorter lengths.
![Page 2: Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systemsbrl.ee.washington.edu/eprints/222/1/Rep162.pdfArtificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022011902/5f0ac5d47e708231d42d44a9/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems
Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford - 2
1. INTRODUCTION
Over the past two decades, few revolutionary technological developments have occurred in the field of
robotics. Expansion into new industries, such as agriculture, construction, environmental (hazardous
waste), human welfare and associated medical services, and entertainment, will demand significant
advances in the robotic state-of-the-art. In particular, these new robots will need to perform well in an
uncontrolled, dynamic environment where a premium is placed on contact stability. Clearly, the
requirements for a surgical robot interacting with both surgeon and patient or a team of robots picking
fruit in an orchard are far different than those for a robot that assembles cell phones or hard drives in a
clean room. Expansion into new industries will require robotic systems that extend or augment human
performance while sharing the work environment with their human operators.
The “Biorobotic” approach to advancing the state-of-the-art is to design robotic components whose
systems emulate the very properties that allow humans and animals to operate successfully in ever-
changing environments. Each component of a biorobotic system incorporates many of the known
aspects of such diverse areas as neuromuscular physiology, biomechanics, and cognitive sciences, into
the design of sensors, actuators, circuits, processors, and control algorithms.
The overall aim of the research presented here is to develop one component of a biorobotic system: a
musculotendon-like actuator. An important step in the development is identifying the properties and
performance that the artificial system is expected to achieve. The known static and dynamic properties
of skeletal muscle and tendon are identified from the extensive physiological literature and
![Page 3: Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systemsbrl.ee.washington.edu/eprints/222/1/Rep162.pdfArtificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022011902/5f0ac5d47e708231d42d44a9/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems
Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford - 3
mathematical models are used to describe their performance. These models serve as a means for
comparison with artificial systems.
In the development of an actual artificial muscle, our approach uses a flexible pneumatic actuator as
the system’s contractile element. This actuator was patented by R. H. Gaylord and applied to orthotic
appliances by J. L. McKibben in the late 1950’s (Gaylord, 1958; Schulte, 1961; Nickel et al., 1963).
The experimental evidence presented demonstrates that the device has force-length properties similar
to skeletal muscle. The addition of a passive hydraulic damper in parallel with the flexible pneumatic
actuator provides a first-order approximation of the desired force-velocity properties.
As with biological systems, muscles attach to bone through tendons and the artificial system must be
no different. One advantage of incorporating elastic tendon elements is to allow for energy storage in
locomotor systems. Energy stored early in the stance phase of the gait cycle can be recovered late in
the gait cycle, minimizing metabolic energy expenditure during propulsive force generation. To
achieve this capacity in our artificial system, we propose the use of a simple but effective artificial
tendon based on the properties of mammalian tendon.
Lastly, we present the experimentally measured performance of our artificial muscle-tendon system
and compare it with model predictions. The results document the ability of the artificial system to
mimic the performance of the biological system in terms of its force, length, and velocity properties.
2. BIOLOGICAL MUSCLE AND TENDON
![Page 4: Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systemsbrl.ee.washington.edu/eprints/222/1/Rep162.pdfArtificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022011902/5f0ac5d47e708231d42d44a9/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems
Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford - 4
The first step in the development of an artificial muscle-tendon system is to identify the properties to
be emulated. For most vertebrates under physiological conditions, the skeletal system is sufficiently
light and rigid that its material properties do not affect static or dynamic performance. In contrast,
muscle-tendon properties and their origin and insertion sites are particularly important and can
dramatically affect movement performance. While the origin and insertion locations can be obtained
post-humously from cadaveric specimens, the properties of muscle and tendon are more difficult to
obtain. As will be shown, muscle and tendon properties vary widely, not only between species but also
within a species. The approach used here will be to present models and data of various species from
the literature and then use this information as a guideline to specify a range appropriate for an artificial
system.
2.1. Skeletal Muscle
During the last century, two muscle modeling approaches have become well established: (1) a
phenomenological approach originating with the thermodynamic experiments of Fenn and Marsh
(1935) and Hill (1938) and (2) a biophysical cross-bridge model originating with Huxley (1957). Both
models have received numerous contributions from contemporary researchers who continue to refine
and evolve these models. Hill-based models are founded upon experiments yielding parameters for
visco-elastic series and parallel elements coupled with a contractile element (figure 1). The results of
such models are often used to predict force, length, and velocity relationships describing muscle
behavior. Huxley-based models are built upon biochemical, thermodynamic, and mechanical
experiments that describe muscle at the molecular level. These models are used to understand the
properties of the microscopic contractile elements.
![Page 5: Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systemsbrl.ee.washington.edu/eprints/222/1/Rep162.pdfArtificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022011902/5f0ac5d47e708231d42d44a9/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems
Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford - 5
Biomechanists, engineers, and motor control scientists using models to describe muscle behavior in
applications ranging from isolated whole muscle to bi-articulate, multi-muscle systems have almost
exclusively used Hill-based models (Zahalak, 1990). Criticisms of this approach have noted that Hill
models may be too simple and fail to capture the essential elements of real muscle. However, the Hill
approach has endured because accurate data for model parameters exist in the literature, motor
function described by Hill models has often been verified experimentally, and simple models often
provide insights hidden by overly complex models (Winters, 1995). The modeling task here is to
provide a description of whole muscle performance to design an artificial system. As a result, a Hill-
based model is an appropriate beginning. Several variations of the Hill model exist, but there are
essentially three components: a parallel element, a series element, and a contractile element (figure 1).
Experimental evidence in the muscle physiology literature shows the parallel element to be a lightly
damped, non-linear elastic element (e.g. Bahler, 1968; Wilkie, 1956; McCrorey et al., 1966; Ralston et
al., 1949). A Kelvin or “standard element” model can accommodate the parallel damping, but rarely is
the complexity of such a model worth the computational effort. Furthermore, experimentally derived
parameters for parallel element models are essentially non-existent. Examination of the existing
animal data reveals the magnitude of the force across the parallel element is negligible when the
muscle is at resting lengths or less. At muscle lengths greater than resting, this force component
rapidly increases.
The parallel element is often ignored in skeletal muscle models (e.g. Woittiez et al., 1984; Bobbert and
van Ingen Schenau, 1990) because the force across the element is insignificant until the muscle is
![Page 6: Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systemsbrl.ee.washington.edu/eprints/222/1/Rep162.pdfArtificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022011902/5f0ac5d47e708231d42d44a9/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems
Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford - 6
stretched beyond its physiological range (~1.2 times the muscle’s resting length). As will be
demonstrated, our choice of an artificial contractile element (a flexible pneumatic actuator) precludes
operations at greater than resting lengths due to physical limitations, as such we also will ignore the
small contributions of a parallel element in our model.
The series elastic element is the stiffer of the two “springs” in the Hill model. Like the parallel
element, it is also generally accepted to be a lightly damped element; thus the damping can be
neglected without loss of accuracy. Animal data reveal the total series element elongation under load
is only a small percentage of the muscle resting length (Bahler, 1967; Wilkie, 1956; McCrorey et al.,
1966). This element is usually neglected in skeletal muscle models when in series with a tendon
whose length is significantly longer than the muscle. In this architecture, the effect of the series
element elongation is negligible (e.g. the 10:1 ratio of the Achilles tendon to the gastrocnemius and
soleus muscles in the human lower limb). As one of our primary applications of this research is a bio-
mimetic, below-knee prosthesis for amputees, our model will also neglect the contributions of a series
elastic element.
2.1.1. Isometric Properties of Muscle
The contractile element is the dominant component of the Hill muscle model. Cook and Stark (1968)
showed that this element could be treated as a force generator in parallel with a damping element.
Under isometric conditions (zero contractile velocity), the output force can be described as a parabolic
function of muscle length (Bahler, 1968). Neglecting the series and parallel elements, this relationship
is given by:
![Page 7: Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systemsbrl.ee.washington.edu/eprints/222/1/Rep162.pdfArtificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022011902/5f0ac5d47e708231d42d44a9/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems
Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford - 7
32
2
1,
kLLk
LLk
FF
oooL
L +
+
= (1)
where oLF , is the maximum isometric force generated by the contractile element when it is at its
“resting” length ( oL =1.0) and LF is the isometric force generated by the contractile element at muscle
length L . Values for the empirical constants 1k , 2k , and 3k can be extracted from the physiology
literature for the frog, rat, cat, and human, and compared with values from several skeletal muscle
models in the biomechanic literature (table 1). Plots predicting the force as a function of length reveal
the expected parabolic form, but importantly, there is considerable variability between results from the
various species as well as between the skeletal muscle models (figure 2). The human data has the
narrowest “operating” range demonstrated by large changes in output force over a small range of
contractile element lengths. The selected frog and rat muscles generated contractile forces over a
larger range of lengths compared to the human, but the cat muscle surpassed all with the widest
operating range of contractile element lengths. The model of Woittiez et al. (1984) fit the data most
closely, while the other models (Bobbert and Ingen Schenau, 1990; Hoy et al., 1990) over estimate the
output force at short contractile element lengths.
2.1.2. Non-Isometric Properties of Muscle
Under non-isometric conditions, the output force of muscle is a function of both length and velocity
for a given level of activation. It is well known that the output force of biological muscle drops
significantly as the contraction velocities increase during shortening (Hill, 1938). The general form of
this relationship is given by:
[ ][ ] [ ] baFbVaF Lm +=++ (2)
![Page 8: Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systemsbrl.ee.washington.edu/eprints/222/1/Rep162.pdfArtificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022011902/5f0ac5d47e708231d42d44a9/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems
Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford - 8
where mF is the muscle force, V is the muscle contraction velocity, and LF is the isometric muscle
force at the instantaneous muscle length from equation (1). The constants a and b are empirically
determined with experiments that report muscle velocity when the muscle is at resting length ( oLV , ).
Their values depend not only on the species of interest, but also on the type of muscle fiber within a
species.
The majority of research conducted on the contractile element of muscle has involved concentric
contractions (i.e. shortening under load; assigned a positive value for velocity by convention).
Obviously, both biological and artificial muscles perform eccentric contractions (i.e. lengthening under
load; assigned a negative value for velocity by convention), but unfortunately, there exists significant
variation in output force for biological muscle under these conditions ( 0/ , ≤oLVV ).
Most skeletal muscle models assume an asymptotic relationship between force and velocity under
eccentric conditions. These models modify the “classic” Hill equation (eq. 2) to obtain an “inverted
Hill” model to describe lengthening muscle behavior. Asymptotic values for these models are
typically assumed to be oLF ,3.1 ⋅ (e.g. Hatze, 1981; Winters and Stark, 1985); however, values ranging
from as low as oLF ,2.1 ⋅ (Hof and van den Berg, 1981a) to as high as oLF ,8.1 ⋅ (Lehman, 1990) have
been used. Limited experimental evidence from the cat soleus muscle shows oLF ,3.1 ⋅ as the
asymptotic value (Joyce et al., 1969).
Values from the muscle physiology literature for the parameters in equation (2) can again be extracted
from the literature for the frog, rat, cat, and human along with values from several skeletal muscle
models (table 2). Examination of the parameters clearly indicates there is a wide range of possible
![Page 9: Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systemsbrl.ee.washington.edu/eprints/222/1/Rep162.pdfArtificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022011902/5f0ac5d47e708231d42d44a9/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems
Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford - 9
values. Plotting the force as a function of velocity when the muscle is at its resting length reveals a
hyperbolic shape where the muscle force monotonically decreases under concentric conditions and
increases under eccentric conditions (see figure 3). Also evident is the significant variation across
animals as well as across the published models purporting to portray the performance of human
skeletal muscle.
2.1.3. Summary of Muscle Model Properties
Due to the wide variance in model parameters that describe muscle performance, specifying exact
parameters for the constants in equations (1) and (2) would certainly be controversial. However, by
specifying a range, we can identify performance that would be acceptable. For designing an artificial
skeletal muscle for locomotion applications, the following constraints can be used to envelope the
desired performance:
5.135.4 1 −≤≤− k (3a)
2.280.9 2 ≤≤ k (3b)
0.145.3 3 −≤≤− k (3c)
41.012.0,
≤≤oLF
a (3d)
41.012.0,
≤≤oLV
b (3e)
![Page 10: Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systemsbrl.ee.washington.edu/eprints/222/1/Rep162.pdfArtificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022011902/5f0ac5d47e708231d42d44a9/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems
Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford - 10
for muscle lengths of 2.17.0 ≤≤ oLL and velocities of 0.1, ≤oLVV . For eccentric conditions, we
will use an “inverted Hill” model that asymptotes to oLF ,3.1 ⋅ but recognize further experimental work
in this area of muscle physiology is necessary.
2.2. Biological Tendon
There is a wide body of literature describing the behavior of tendon under load. Some investigators
have removed structural characteristics by reporting stress versus strain, while others have reported the
form in which the data was recorded, namely force versus elongation. The stress v. strain curve of
tendon exhibits a characteristic “toe” region where stress increases slowly with strain at first. Further
strain results in more rapid increases in stress followed by a region where stress increases linearly with
strain until failure. Confounding problems include the freshness of the specimen (some investigators
have used embalmed tissue), grip failures, and appropriate strain rates (e.g. Lewis and Shaw, 1997; Ker
et al., 1988).
Ker and others (1988) observed that there are two primary purposes for tendon: one is for transmitting
muscular action into forces for fine manipulation and the other is for energy storage during
locomotion. The focus of our efforts is on energy storing tendons due to our interest in lower limb
prosthetic applications. While data on human lower limbs is sparse, data for a variety of energy storing
animal tendons is abundant. Experimental data is available in the literature for the camel (Alexander
et al., 1982), deer (Bennett et al., 1986), dog (Webster and Werner, 1983), donkey (Bennett et al.,
1986), horse (Bennett et al., 1986; Herrick et al., 1978; Riemershma and Schamhardt, 1985), human
(Harris et al., 1966; Lewis and Shaw, 1997), pig (Bennett et al., 1986; Woo et al., 1981), rat (Minns
![Page 11: Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systemsbrl.ee.washington.edu/eprints/222/1/Rep162.pdfArtificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022011902/5f0ac5d47e708231d42d44a9/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems
Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford - 11
and Muckle, 1982), sheep (Bennett et al., 1986; Ker, 1987), and wallaby (Bennett et al., 1986; Ker at
al., 1986).
Compilation of this data (Klute et al., 2000b) reveals a monotonically increasing stress (σ ) v. strain
(ε ) relationship given by:
nEεσ = (4)
where the modulus of elasticity ( E ) and strain exponent ( n ) must be empirically determined.
In the biomechanics literature, a number of investigators have published models describing the
relationship between stress and strain or force and elongation in tendons (see figure 4: Bobbert et al.,
1986; Zajac, 1989; Bobbert and van Ingen Schenau, 1990; Voigt et al., 1995a and b; Hof, 1998).
Nearly all of the experimental evidence is bounded within the extremes described by the models of
Bobbert and van Ingen Schenau (1990) and Hof (1998). The data from Hof, on the lower bound, is
based on an in-vivo human experiment and may indicate that in-vivo tendon is more complaint than in-
vitro or post-mortem tendon. For design applications, we interpret this data as defining a model of
tendon whose relationship between stress and strain is described within:
133335773 ≤≤ E (5a)
2≈n (5b)
where the units of E are MPa and n is dimensionless.
3. ARTIFICIAL MUSCLE AND TENDON
![Page 12: Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systemsbrl.ee.washington.edu/eprints/222/1/Rep162.pdfArtificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022011902/5f0ac5d47e708231d42d44a9/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems
Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford - 12
The stated objective of this research is the development of a muscle- and tendon-like actuator. While
some investigators have proposed the use of commercially available actuators (e.g. Wu et al., 1997;
Yoda and Shita, 1994; Cocatre-Zilgien et al., 1996), others have suggested novel actuators such as
shape-memory alloys (Mills, 1993), electro-reactive gels (Mitwalli et al., 1997), ionic polymer-metal
composites (Mojarrad and Shahinpoor, 1997), and stepper motors with ball screw drives connected to
elastic elements (Robinson et al., 1999). Our approach has used a flexible pneumatic actuator made
from an inflatable inner bladder sheathed with a double helical weave which contracts lengthwise
when expanded radially.
3.1. Artificial Contractile Element
First popularized by J. L. McKibben as an orthotic appliance for polio patients (Nickel et al., 1963),
flexible pneumatic actuators have seen more recent use in a variety of robotics applications (Inoue,
1987; Klute and Hannaford, 1998; Klute et al., 2000a; van der Smagt et al.,1996; Caldwell et al.,
1993a; b; 1994; 1995; 1997; van der Linde, 1998; Cai and Yamaura, 1996; Paynter, 1996; Noritsugu et
al., 1999; Festo Pneumatics, 2000; Birch et al., 2000). This actuator serves as the contractile element
of our artificial muscle.
There are a number of parameters that significantly affect the performance of the flexible pneumatic
actuator. The contraction stroke length, force generated, and air volume consumption are all
dependent on the geometry and material of the inner bladder and exterior braided shell. A number of
investigators have attempted to model the actuator, and these models fall into several categories: (a)
empirical models (Chou and Hannaford, 1996; Gavrilovic and Maric, 1969; Medrano-Cerda et al.,
![Page 13: Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systemsbrl.ee.washington.edu/eprints/222/1/Rep162.pdfArtificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022011902/5f0ac5d47e708231d42d44a9/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems
Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford - 13
1995), (b) models based on geometry (Chou and Hannaford, 1996; Schulte, 1961; Tondu et al., 1994;
Inoue, 1987; Cai and Yamaura, 1996), and (c) models that include material properties (Chou and
Hannaford, 1996; Schulte, 1961). Our most recent efforts to improve model predictions of
performance have incorporated non-linear material properties; however, further work is necessary to
achieve satisfactory results (Klute and Hannaford, 2000).
We conducted a series of experiments on actuators of different sizes over a range of operating
pressures (0 to 5 bar), velocities (-150 mm/sec eccentric to +300 mm/sec concentric), and lengths
( oo LLL ⋅≤≤⋅ 00.165.0 where oL refers to the resting length of the actuator) to assess the accuracy of
model predictions (Klute et al., 1999; Klute and Hannaford, 2000). Because actuator output force is
proportional to radial expansion, actuators with short resting lengths perform poorly because radial
expansion is constrained at the actuator ends by its construction. To minimize this effect, all our
actuators were constructed such that their resting length to diameter ratio was at least 14.
Measuring the output force under constant velocity conditions while maintaining constant pressure
over the actuator’s working length, we found the output force to be a function of length, but not a
function of velocity (figure 5). The force at each pressure (only P=5 bar is shown for clarity) increases
from zero at the actuator’s minimum length to the maximum value obtained when the actuator is at its
longest length (equal to the unpressurized “resting” length). Comparing the force-length data to the
biological muscle of the frog, rat, cat, and human reveals the actuator is somewhat similar to biological
muscle; however, there are a few significant differences between the artificial and natural actuators
(figure 6). The biological data has a parabolic force-length relationship whose slope monotonically
decreases with increases in length. In contrast, the output force of the flexible pneumatic actuator is
![Page 14: Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systemsbrl.ee.washington.edu/eprints/222/1/Rep162.pdfArtificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022011902/5f0ac5d47e708231d42d44a9/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems
Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford - 14
not parabolic and its slope monotonically increases with length. Furthermore, unlike biological
muscle, the flexible pneumatic actuator cannot be stretched beyond its resting length. In spite of these
differences, the force-length relationship of the flexible pneumatic actuator is close to the bio-mimetic
limits defined by equation (3 a-c).
Unfortunately, the force-velocity properties of the flexible pneumatic actuator are nowhere near the
bio-mimetic limits defined by equation (3 d-e). The results show the actuator has only a small amount
of natural damping as output force decreases only slightly with increases in velocity. At maximum
contraction velocity, the output force decreased by only 6 percent while biological muscle decreases to
zero output force (figures 3 and 5).
In conclusion, these tests on the flexible pneumatic actuator demonstrate that under isometric
conditions, the actuator is a reasonable approximation to biological muscle. However, under dynamic
conditions, the performance must be improved.
3.2. Damping Element
To create an artificial muscle whose properties are bio-mimetic under both isometric and dynamic
conditions, a hydraulic damper with a passive, fixed orifice was added in parallel to the flexible
pneumatic actuator (figure 7). This design preserves the muscle-like force-length characteristics while
improving the force-velocity properties. An actively controlled orifice with a fast response might be
able to perfectly mimic biological muscle; however, such an orifice would add a significant level of
![Page 15: Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systemsbrl.ee.washington.edu/eprints/222/1/Rep162.pdfArtificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022011902/5f0ac5d47e708231d42d44a9/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems
Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford - 15
complexity to the system. Adopting a fixed orifice approach results in a simpler system, albeit with a
corresponding loss in potential performance.
For a damper in parallel with the flexible pneumatic actuator, the desired damping force ( hydF ) is
simply:
mfpahyd FFF −= (6)
where fpaF is the flexible pneumatic actuator output force whose value can either be taken from
experiment or from a model published elsewhere (Klute and Hannaford, 2000). mF is the force
produced by biological muscle, modeled by equations (1) through (3).
Approaching the problem of calculating the desired orifice size using conservation of energy,
Bernoulli’s equation can be written as:
gP
gP
2v
2v 2
222
11 +=+ρρ
(7)
where P is pressure, v is fluid velocity, ρ is the fluid density, and g is gravity. The subscripts 1 and
2 refer to cylinder and orifice locations.
Furthermore, conservation of mass ( m ) demands:
21 mm = (8)
such that:
2211 vAvA ρρ = (9)
where A is the cross-sectional area. An empirical enhancement to this equation is the multiplication
of a discharge coefficient ( dC ) to the right side of equation (9). This coefficient accounts for vena
![Page 16: Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systemsbrl.ee.washington.edu/eprints/222/1/Rep162.pdfArtificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022011902/5f0ac5d47e708231d42d44a9/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems
Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford - 16
contracture at the orifice, an effective reduction in cross-sectional area at high Reynold’s numbers.
The value of this coefficient is 1.0 at low Reynold’s numbers, but can be as low as 0.61 for very high
Reynold’s numbers. We have set this parameter to 1.0 for our simulations but plan future
experimental measurements.
Substitution and simplification yields an equation for determining the ideal orifice size:
221
41
2hyd
61
214
2v8
vdd CCF ρπφ
ρφπφ+
= (10)
where 2φ is the orifice diameter and 1φ is the cylinder bore diameter.
Equation (10) gives the instantaneous orifice diameter required to obtain the precise amount of
damping desired. However, as previously noted, such an adjustable orifice would add a significant
level of complexity to the system. The damping force generated by a fixed orifice damper can be
calculated from:
−= 1
8v
42
2
41
21
21
hydφ
φπρφdC
F (11)
Since the hydraulic damping force is a function of the square of the velocity, the shape of the force v.
velocity curve will be convex instead of the desired concavity exhibited by biological muscle.
However, if the fixed orifice size is selected based on the muscle length as well as velocity, the effect
of this design can be minimized. Other caveats for this simple hydraulic damping model include
omission of piston rod lipseal friction, frictional losses within the hydraulic lines, and the effects of
vena contracture at the orifice. Furthermore, many of these losses are a function of the Reynold’s
number. In this system, the Reynold’s number varies widely depending on location and actuator
contraction velocity.
![Page 17: Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systemsbrl.ee.washington.edu/eprints/222/1/Rep162.pdfArtificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022011902/5f0ac5d47e708231d42d44a9/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems
Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford - 17
In order to optimize the damper design, the orifice diameter is selected by minimizing the difference
between a flexible pneumatic actuator in parallel with perfect, Hill-like damping and a flexible
pneumatic actuator with fixed orifice hydraulic damping (Klute et al., 1999). This design approach
results in an actuator system that mimics biological muscle to the greatest degree possible while
maintaining simplicity. To complete the design process, knowledge of the peak muscle forces, lengths,
and velocities are required and are application dependent.
3.3. Artificial Tendons
As with the biological system, the artificial system must also have a tendon in series with muscle. One
approach to tendon design uses a number of offset linear springs arranged in parallel to achieve the
desired parabolic force-length relationship (Frisen et al., 1969). With more springs comes better
performance, but practical realization of such a system suffers from a penalty in terms of the space to
accommodate numerous springs as well as their associated weight. Our approach was to utilize two
springs to minimize this penalty, albeit with the commensurate loss of performance (Klute et al.,
2000b). A model of this two-spring system is given by:
xKF eq2spring = (12)
where 2springF is the force of the two offset springs and x is the deformation. The equivalent spring
constant ( eqK ) is given by:
≥<
=aba
aaeq
LxKKLxK
K (13)
where aL is the offset distance between springs aK and bK and
![Page 18: Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systemsbrl.ee.washington.edu/eprints/222/1/Rep162.pdfArtificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022011902/5f0ac5d47e708231d42d44a9/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems
Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford - 18
ba
baba
KKKKKK
+= (14).
Based on the existing animal data (see section 2.2), we defined a generic, energy storing tendon (EST)
using a least squares fit such that the resulting modulus of elasticity and strain exponent are given by
E =10289 MPa and n =1.91. It is appropriate to be cautious with this analysis because different
methods were used to collect the data and some data points represent many specimens while others
represent only a single specimen. Nevertheless, the EST model provides a simple design requirement
to select the spring constants of the two-spring system. To convert from material (equation 4) to
structural properties, the force versus elongation relationship is given by:
n
ot
ottEST L
LLEAF
−=
,
, (15)
where ESTF is the modeled tendon force, A is the tendon’s cross-sectional area, ot,L is the tendon’s
resting length, and tL the tendon length under load. Resting lengths and areas for a wide variety of
tendons are available in the literature.
The two spring constants ( aK and bK ) and the offset distance between the two springs ( aL ) can be
selected by minimizing the difference in stored energy between the two-spring implementation and the
EST model:
( )
−∫Lt
EST2springmin FF (16).
4. ARTIFICIAL TRICEPS SURAE AND ACHILLES TENDON DESIGN
![Page 19: Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systemsbrl.ee.washington.edu/eprints/222/1/Rep162.pdfArtificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022011902/5f0ac5d47e708231d42d44a9/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems
Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford - 19
For the purposes of describing their performance, the properties of skeletal muscle and biological
tendon have been presented in a dimensionless format. Likewise, the theoretical development of an
artificial muscle powered by a flexible pneumatic actuator and a mechanical tendon intended to mimic
their biological counterparts have also been formulated without regard to a specific muscle or tendon.
The next step, construction of a physical muscle-tendon actuator, necessitates specification. To this
end, we are currently developing a bio-mimetic limb for transtibial human amputees for which the
properties of the triceps surae muscles and Achilles tendon have been extracted from the literature.
4.1. Specifications
Simply to achieve walking, the ankle musculature must provide a plantar-flexion torque of
approximately 110 N-m, a range of motion of 30 degrees, a velocity of 225 degrees per second, and a
sustained energy output of 36 Joules per step across an ankle moment arm of 47 mm (Winter, 1990;
Gitter et al., 1991; Spoor et al., 1990). Using this data, the peak force produced by the triceps surae
can be calculated to be approximately 2340 N, however, this peak occurs during a concentric
contraction (muscle shortening under load). Accounting for tendon lengthening using the EST model,
the muscle velocity at peak force can be estimated at 35 mm/sec, indicating that under isometric
conditions, this same muscle would need to produce slightly more force (~2400 to 2500 N).
Cross-sectional area and length data for the Achilles tendon can also be extracted from the literature.
The mean cross-sectional area from published reports is 65 mm2 (49 mm2 Yamaguchi et al., 1990; 54
mm2 Lewis and Shaw, 1997; 55 mm2 Woittiez et al., 1984; 61 mm2 Abrahams, 1967; 65 mm2 Voigt et
al., 1995a; 81 mm2 Komi, 1990; 89 mm2 Ker et al., 1987). The length of the Achilles tendon is more
![Page 20: Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systemsbrl.ee.washington.edu/eprints/222/1/Rep162.pdfArtificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022011902/5f0ac5d47e708231d42d44a9/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems
Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford - 20
difficult to ascertain due to the area across which it attaches to bone and muscle. Yamaguchi and
others (1990) cite two references for tendon lengths of the gastrocnemius medialis, gastrocnemius
lateralis, and soleus muscles that form the triceps surae. The average length of these tendons,
collectively taken as the Achilles tendon, is 363.5 mm. This data, when used in conjunction with
equations 4, 5, and 15 provide the design specification for the artificial tendon.
4.2. Design
To generate peak forces desired during walking, our design uses two flexible pneumatic actuators in
parallel in lieu of a single, larger actuator. This design provides limited functionality in the event of an
actuator failure and balances the force of a centrally located, fixed orifice hydraulic damper in parallel
with the actuators. A pair of linear bearings is incorporated in the design to prevent binding between
the hydraulic cylinder and its piston. The linear bearings also introduce a limitation in the maximum
force produced by the system. In the event of an actuator failure, the off-axis load capacity of the
linear bearings is 900 N, thus the maximum force of the two actuators in parallel is limited to 1800 N.
This is less than the desired 2500 N identified above and will result in the generation of lower than
desired propulsive forces. This limitation will be corrected in the next generation artificial muscle and
tendon. To accommodate differences in hydraulic volumes between the rod and bore sides of the
hydraulic damper cylinder piston, a small hydraulic ballast chamber was incorporated as the hydraulic
fluid is nearly incompressible.
The flexible pneumatic actuators were constructed with a natural latex rubber bladder with an interior
diameter of 12.8 mm and a wall thickness of 1.6 mm. The polyester exterior braid had a minimum
![Page 21: Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systemsbrl.ee.washington.edu/eprints/222/1/Rep162.pdfArtificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022011902/5f0ac5d47e708231d42d44a9/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems
Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford - 21
diameter of 12.8 mm and the completed actuator assembly had a resting length of 250 mm. The
hydraulic damper had a cylinder bore of 22.2 mm, the cylinder rod diameter was 6.4 mm, and the
stroke length was 76 mm. The eccentric orifice diameter (on the bore side of the cylinder) was 1.5 mm
and the concentric orifice diameter (on the rod side of the cylinder) was 1.2 mm. The density of the
hydraulic fluid was 900 kg/m3.
The actuators and damper are then placed together in series with a mechanical, two-spring tendon
(figure 8). The spring constants aK and bK , found by minimizing equation 16, are 65 N/mm and 115
N/mm respectively with an offset of 8.9 mm.
5. ARTIFICIAL MUSCLE-TENDON EXPERIMENTS
A series of experiments were conducted using an axial-torsional Bionix (MTS Systems, Minnesota,
USA) testing instrument to measure the force-length-velocity properties (see figure 8). The
experiments measured the force output over a range of constant activation pressures (2 to 5 bar),
velocities (-300 mm/sec eccentric to +300 mm/sec concentric), and actuator-tendon lengths
(290 ≤≤ L 370 mm).
5.1. Methods
The MTS testing instrument was used to apply a series of constant velocity profiles during concentric
and eccentric contractions by the artificial muscle-tendon system. The tested velocities included 1, 10,
25, 50, 100, 150, 200, 250, and 300 mm/sec. For each specified velocity, the artificial muscle-tendon
![Page 22: Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systemsbrl.ee.washington.edu/eprints/222/1/Rep162.pdfArtificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022011902/5f0ac5d47e708231d42d44a9/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems
Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford - 22
first contracted concentrically over its full displacement range, and then it contracted eccentrically to
complete the cycle. Due to acceleration and deceleration at the ends of the contraction range, the MTS
testing instrument was able to constrain the velocity to the specified value for only the middle 90
percent of the contraction range. The artificial muscle-tendon was first tested at an activation pressure
of 2 bar for each velocity specified, and then again at each activation pressure of 3, 4, and 5 bar. To
ensure the actuator pressure remained constant during changes in length, a pneumatic ballast tank
(tank:actuator volume ratio of 4000:1) was attached in close proximity to the flexible pneumatic
actuators.
5.2. Results
To predict the expected performance of the artificial muscle-tendon constructed as identified above,
we generated model results using two flexible pneumatic actuator as the contractile element in parallel
with a fixed orifice hydraulic damper, and then in series with a mechanical, two spring tendon. The
model allowed prediction of the force-length-velocity relationship prior to construction (figure 9). In
general, the model results indicate a first-order approximation of skeletal muscle and biological
tendon. Isometrically, predicted force outputs are higher at longer muscle lengths than shorter lengths.
Concentric contractions yield lower predicted force outputs with a convex force-velocity profile while
eccentric contractions yield higher predicted force outputs with a concave force-velocity profile. For
comparison, skeletal muscle exhibits a concave force-velocity profile during concentric contractions
and a convex force-velocity profile during eccentric contractions. The peak isometric force predicted
is approximately 1600 N at an activation pressure of 5 bar. Also, predicted forces were proportional to
![Page 23: Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systemsbrl.ee.washington.edu/eprints/222/1/Rep162.pdfArtificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022011902/5f0ac5d47e708231d42d44a9/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems
Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford - 23
changes in activation pressure, however only the maximum pressure case is shown for clarity (P=5
bar).
The experimental results reveal the force-length-velocity relationship of the artificial muscle-tendon
actuator (figures 10 and 11). In general, faster concentric contractions resulted in lower force outputs,
faster eccentric contractions produced higher force outputs, and output forces were higher at longer
muscle lengths than shorter lengths. As expected from model predictions, the concentric force-
velocity profile was convex while the eccentric force-velocity profile was concave. At the maximum
activation pressure (P=5 bar), the maximum isometric force was 1600 N, while the peak force of 2000
N occurred under eccentric conditions at 300 mm/sec. Lower pressures exhibited proportionally lower
forces but are not shown for clarity. Lipseal friction of the hydraulic cylinder is evident during
changes in contraction direction and is on the order of 25 N.
5.3. Discussion
The force-length-velocity relationship of the artificial muscle-tendon actuator is qualitatively similar to
the triceps surae and Achilles tendon model prediction and is a first-order approximation of skeletal
muscle and biological tendon. The flexible pneumatic actuator serves as the contractile element whose
force-length relationship is reasonably close to skeletal muscle. Like skeletal muscle, the force outputs
are higher at longer muscle lengths than shorter lengths, and the force is proportional to activation
pressure. However, un-like skeletal muscle, the flexible pneumatic actuator cannot be stretched
beyond its resting length and the force v. velocity curve has a concave shape rather than convex. These
remain as significant differences when compared to the biological actuator.
![Page 24: Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systemsbrl.ee.washington.edu/eprints/222/1/Rep162.pdfArtificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022011902/5f0ac5d47e708231d42d44a9/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems
Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford - 24
To approximate the desired force-velocity characteristics, a hydraulic damper with fixed, flow
restricting orifices was incorporated into the system. However, since the hydraulic damping force is a
function of the square of the velocity while skeletal muscle is hyperbolic, the shape of the force-
velocity curve is not biological. For concentric contractions, the force-velocity curves of the artificial
system are convex instead of the desired concave, while for eccentric contractions the curves are
concave rather than the desired convex profile. Refinements to the proposed system, such as stepper
motor controlled needle valves or passive orifices constructed from materials that deform under
pressure, can certainly be introduced. Another significant difference between the artificial and
biological system is the lipseal friction inherent in the hydraulic damper. The effect of this friction is
particularly evident at changes in contraction direction (concentric and eccentric). The current design
uses a single acting cylinder which minimizes lipseal friction as it uses only one rod seal, however, the
differences in volume between the rod and bore sides of the cylinder necessitates the use of a small
hydraulic ballast chamber. A double acting cylinder would eliminate the need for the ballast chamber,
but it uses two rod seals and would increase the observed lipseal friction.
The performance of energy storing tendons is emulated with two offset linear springs arranged in
parallel. Previous tests demonstrate the tendon design meets performance requirements while
minimizing the weight and volume penalties (Klute et al., 2000b). The performance of this design
could be improved, but only at the cost of additional springs. Another approach, using lightweight
polymer springs with non-linear elastic properties, might better mimic the biological stress-strain curve
while reducing weight.
![Page 25: Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systemsbrl.ee.washington.edu/eprints/222/1/Rep162.pdfArtificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022011902/5f0ac5d47e708231d42d44a9/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems
Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford - 25
The design provides a first-order approximation of biological muscle and tendon and is suitable for a
number of applications. The design can be modified to meet the application requirements just as
biological muscle and tendon also come in different sizes. The force output can be scaled by using
either a flexible pneumatic actuator with a larger diameter or by placing several smaller diameter
actuators in parallel. The length of the actuator ( oL ) is selected at construction, however the
contraction ratio ( oLL ) remains fixed at approximately 0.7 and is independent of actuator diameter.
The components of the system are inexpensive and widely available.
6. CONCLUSIONS
The design of the artificial musclo-tendon actuator proposed in this paper is based on known static and
dynamic properties of vertebrate skeletal muscle and tendon that were extracted from the literature.
These properties were used to mathematically describe the unique force, length, and velocity
relationships and specify the performance requirements for an artificial muscle-tendon actuator. To
meet these requirements, we constructed an artificial muscle, consisting of two flexible pneumatic
actuators in parallel with a hydraulic damper, and placed it in series with a bi-linear, two-spring
implementation of an artificial tendon intended to mimic the triceps surae and Achilles tendon. To
verify the system’s performance, we experimentally measured the output force for various velocity and
activation profiles enveloped by the maximum conditions expected during human locomotion. The
experimental results show the actuator-damper-tendon system behaves in a muscle- and tendon-like
manner.
![Page 26: Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systemsbrl.ee.washington.edu/eprints/222/1/Rep162.pdfArtificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022011902/5f0ac5d47e708231d42d44a9/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems
Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford - 26
The use of physical as opposed to virtual models imposes demanding constraints on the study of
organism-scale systems. The number of assumptions that can be included in a musculo-skeletal or
neuro-mechanical model is dramatically reduced when embedded controllers, sensors, and actuators
are involved. This unique artificial muscle-tendon system can serve as the actuator in numerous
applications yet to be explored. Prosthetic limbs, robotic systems that share the work space with
humans, entertainment robots, service robots for the elderly, tele-operated devices, and systems that
extend or augment human capabilities are but a few of the possibilities.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Rehabilitation Research and
Development Service, project number A0806C, supported the research reported here. Glenn K. Klute,
Ph. D. is a Research Health Scientist at the VA Puget Sound Health Care Systems, Seattle, WA.
REFERENCES
Abbott, B. C. and Wilkie, D. R., 1953, The relation between velocity of shortening and the tension-
length curve of skeletal muscle, Journal of Physiology, 120, 214-22.
Abrahams, M., 1967, Mechanical behaviour of tendon in vitro. A preliminary report, Medical and
Biological Engineering, 5, 5, 433-443.
Alexander, R. McN., Maloiy, G. M. O., Ker, R. F., AS Jayes, and C. N. Warui, 1982, The role of
tendon elasticity in the locomotion of the camel (Camelus dromedarius), Journal of Zoology,
London, 198, 293-313.
![Page 27: Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systemsbrl.ee.washington.edu/eprints/222/1/Rep162.pdfArtificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022011902/5f0ac5d47e708231d42d44a9/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems
Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford - 27
Bahler, A. S., 1967, Series elastic component of mammalian skeletal muscle, American Journal of
Physiology, 213, 6, 1560-1564.
Bahler, A. S., 1968, Modeling of mammalian skeletal muscle, IEEE Transactions of Bio-Medical
Engineering, BME-15, 4, 249-257.
Bennett, M. B., Ker, R. F., Dimery, N. J., and Alexander, R. McN., 1986, Mechanical properties of
various mammalian tendons, Journal of Zoology, London, A209, 537-548.
Birch, M. C., Quinn, R. D., Hahm, G., Phillips, S. M., Drennan, B., Fife, A., Verma, H. and Beer, R.
D., 2000, April, Design of cricket microrobot, 2000 IEEE International Conference on Robotics
and Automation, San Francisco, CA, 1109-1114.
Bobbert, M. F. and van Ingen Schenau, G. J., 1990, Isokinetic plantar flexion: experimental results and
model calculations, Journal of Biomechanics, 23, 2, 105-119.
Bobbert, M. F., Huijing, P. A., and van Ingen Schenau, G. J., 1986, A model of the human triceps
surae muscle-tendon complex applied to jumping, Journal of Biomechanics, 19, 11, 887-898.
Cai, D. and Yamaura, H., 1996, A robust controller for a manipulator driven by artificial muscle
actuator, 1996 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications, Dearborn, MI, 540-545.
Caldwell D. G., Razak, A., and Goodwin, M., 1993a, April, Braided pneumatic muscle actuators,
International Federation of Automatic Control Workshop on Intelligent Autonomous Vehicles,
Southampton, UK, 507-512.
Caldwell D. G., Medrano-Cerda, G. A., and Bowler, C. J., 1997, April, Investigation of bipedal robot
locomotion using pneumatic muscle actuators, 1997 IEEE International Conference on Robotics
and Automation, Albuquerque, NM, 1, 799-804.
![Page 28: Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systemsbrl.ee.washington.edu/eprints/222/1/Rep162.pdfArtificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022011902/5f0ac5d47e708231d42d44a9/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems
Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford - 28
Caldwell D. G., Razak, A., and Goodwin, M., 1993b, October, Braided pneumatic actuator control of a
multi-jointed manipulator, 1993 International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Le
Touquet, France, 1 423-428.
Caldwell D. G., Razak, A., and Goodwin, M., 1994, May, Characteristics and adaptive control of
pneumatic muscle actuators for a robotic elbow, 1994 IEEE International Conference on Robotics
and Automation, San Diego, CA, 4, 3558-3563.
Caldwell D. G., Razak, A., and Goodwin, M., 1995, Control of pneumatic muscle actuators, IEEE
Control Systems Magazine, 15, 1, 40-48.
Chou, C. P. and Hannaford, B., 1996, Measurement and modeling of artificial muscles, IEEE
Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 12, 90-102.
Cocatre-Zilgien, J. H., Delcomyn, F. and Hart, J. M., 1996, Performance of a muscle-like “leaky”
pneumatic actuator powered by modulated air pulses, Journal of Robotic Systems, 13, 6, 379-390.
Cook, G. and Stark, L., 1968, The human eye movement mechanism: experiments, modelling and
model testing, Archives of Ophthalmology, 79, 428-436.
Fenn, W. O. and Marsh, B. S., 1935, Muscular force at different speeds of shortening, Journal of
Physiology, London, 85, 277-297.
Festo Pneumatic Systems, 2000, http://www.festo.com/pneumatic/eng/festo2000/46.htm
Frisen, M., Magi, M., Sonnerup, L., and Viidik, A., 1969, Rheological analysis of soft collagenous
tissue. Part I: theoretical considerations, Journal of Biomechanics, 2, 13-20.
Gavrilovic, M. M. and Maric, M. R., 1969, Positional servo-mechanism activated by artificial muscles,
Medical and Biological Engineering, 7, 77-82.
Gaylord, R. H., 1958, United States Patent 2,844,126.
![Page 29: Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systemsbrl.ee.washington.edu/eprints/222/1/Rep162.pdfArtificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022011902/5f0ac5d47e708231d42d44a9/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems
Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford - 29
Gitter A., Czerniecki J. M., and DeGroot, D. M., 1991, Biomechanical Analysis of the Influence of
Prosthetic Feet on Below-Knee Amputee Walking, American Journal of Physical Medicine and
Rehabilitation, 70, 3, 142-148.
Gordon, A. M., Huxley, A. F., and Julia, F. J., 1966, The variation in isometric tension with sarcomere
length in vertebrate muscle fibres, Journal of Physiology, London, 184, 170-192.
Harris, E. H., Walker, L. B., and Bass, B. R., 1966, Stress-strain studies in cadaveric human tendon
and an anomaly in the Young’s modulus thereof, Medicine and Biology in Engineering, 4, 253-
259.
Hatze, H., 1981, Myocybernetic control models of skeletal muscle, University of South Africa,
Pretoria.
Herrick, W. C., Kingsbury, H. B., and Lou, D. Y. S., 1978, A study of the normal range of strain, strain
rate, and stiffness of tendon, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 12, 877-894.
Hill, A. V., 1938, The heat of shortening and the dynamic constants of muscle, Proceedings of the
Royal Society, B126, 136-195.
Hill, A. V., 1953, The mechanics of active muscle, Proceedings of the Royal Society, London, B195,
50-53.
Hof, A. L., 1998, In vivo measurement of the series elasticity release curve of human triceps surae
muscle, Journal of Biomechanics, 31, 793-800.
Hof, A. L. and van den Berg, J. W., 1981, EMG to force processing. II: estimation of parameters of
the Hill muscle model for the human triceps surae by means of a calf-ergometer, Journal of
Biomechanics, 14, 759-770.
![Page 30: Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systemsbrl.ee.washington.edu/eprints/222/1/Rep162.pdfArtificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022011902/5f0ac5d47e708231d42d44a9/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems
Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford - 30
Hoy, M. G., Zajac, F. E., and Gordon, M. E., 1990, A musculoskeletal model of the human lower
extremity: the effect of muscle, tendon, and moment arm on the moment-angle relationship of
musculotendon actuators at the hip, knee, and ankle, Journal of Biomechanics, 23, 2, 157-169.
Huxley, A. F., 1957, Muscle structure and theories of contraction, Progress in Biophysics and
Biophysical Chemistry, 7, 257-318.
Inoue, K., 1987, Rubbertuators and applications for robots, 4th Symposium on Robotics Research,
Tokyo, 57-63.
Joyce, G. C., Rack, P. M., and Westbury, D. R., 1969, The mechanical properties of the cat soleus
muscle during controlled lengthening and shortening movements, Journal of Physiology, 204,
461-474.
Ker R. F., Alexander, R. McN., and Bennett, M. B., 1988, Why are mammalian tendons so thick?
Journal of Zoology, London, 216, 309-324.
Ker R. F., Bennett, M. B., Bibby, S. P., Kester R. C., and Alexander, R. McN., 1987, The spring in the
arch of the foot, Nature, 325, 147-149.
Ker, R. F., 1978, Dynamic tensile properties of the plantaris tendon of sheep (Ovis aries), Journal of
Experimental Biology, 93, 283-302.
Ker, R. F., Dimery, N. J., and Alexander, R. McN., 1986, The role of tendon elasticity in hopping in a
wallaby (Macropus rufogriseus), Journal of Zoology, London, Series A, 208, 417-428.
Klute, G. K. and Hannaford, B., 1998, October 13-17, Fatigue characteristics of McKibben artificial
muscle actuators, 1998 International Conference on Intelligent Robotic Systems, Victoria BC,
Canada, 1776-1781.
Klute, G. K. and Hannaford, B., 2000, Accounting for elastic energy storage in McKibben artificial
muscle actuators, Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurements, and Control, 122, 2, 386-388.
![Page 31: Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systemsbrl.ee.washington.edu/eprints/222/1/Rep162.pdfArtificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022011902/5f0ac5d47e708231d42d44a9/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems
Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford - 31
Klute, G. K., Czerniecki, J., and Hannaford, B., 1999, September 19-23, McKibben artificial muscles:
actuators with biomechanical intelligence, 1999 International Conference on Advanced Intelligent
Mechatronics, Atlanta, GA, 221-226.
Klute, G. K., Czerniecki, J., and Hannaford, B., 2000a, June 19-21, Muscle-like pneumatic actuators
for below-knee prostheses, Actuator 2000: 7th International Conference on New Actuators,
Bremen, Germany, 289-292.
Klute, G. K., Czerniecki, J., and Hannaford, B., 2000b, July 23-28, Artificial Tendons: Biomechanical
Properties for Prosthetic Lower Limbs, World Congress 2000 on Medical Physics and Biomedical
Engineering and the 22nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine
and Biology Society, Chicago, IL.
Komi, P., 1990, Relevance of in vivo force measurements to human biomechanics, Journal of
Biomechanics, 23, Supplement 1, 23-34.
Lehman, S. L., 1990, Input identification depends on model complexity, Multiple Muscle Systems:
Biomechanics and Movement Organization, J. M. Winters and S. L-Y. Woo (eds), Springer-
Verlag, New York, 94-100.
Lewis, G. and Shaw, K. M., 1997, Tensile properties of human tendo achillis: effect of donor age and
strain rate, Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, 36, 6, 435-445.
McCrorey, H. L., Gale, H. H., and Alpert, N. R., 1966, Mechanical properties of the cat tenuissimus
muscle, American Journal of Physiology, 210, 114-120.
Medrano-Cerda, G. A., Bowler, C. J., and Caldwell, D. G., 1995, Adaptive position control of
antagonistic pneumatic muscle actuators, 1995 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent
Robots and Systems, Pittsburgh, PA, 1, 378-383.
![Page 32: Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systemsbrl.ee.washington.edu/eprints/222/1/Rep162.pdfArtificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022011902/5f0ac5d47e708231d42d44a9/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems
Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford - 32
Mills, J. W., 1993, Lukasiewicz’ insect: the role of continuous-valued logic in a mobile robot’s
sensors, control, and locomotion, 23rd International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic,
Sacramento, CA, 258-263.
Minns, R. J. and Muckle, D. S., 1982, Mechanical properties of traumatized rat tendo-achilles and the
effect of an anti-inflammatory drug on the repair properties, Journal of Biomechanics, 15, 10, 783-
787.
Mitwalli, A. H., Denison, T. A., Jackson, D. K., Leeb, S. B. and Tanaka, T., 1997, Closed-loop
feedback control of magnetically-activated gels, Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and
Structures, 8, 7, 596-604.
Mojarrad, M. and Shahinpoor, M., 1997, Ion-exchange-metal composite artificial muscle actuator load
characterization and modeling, 1997 SPIE Conference on Smart Structures and Materials, San
Diego, CA, 3040, 294-301.
Nickel, V.L., Perry, J. and Garrett, A. L., 1963, Development of useful function in the severely
paralyzed hand., Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 45A, 5, 933-952.
Noritsugu T., Tsuji, Y., and Ito, K., 1999, Improvement of control performance of pneumatic rubber
artificial muscle manipulator by using electroreological fluid damper, IEEE International
Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 6, 788-793.
Paynter, H. M., 1996, Thermodynamic treatment of tug-&-twist technology: Part 1. Thermodynamic
tugger design, Japan-USA Symposium on Flexible Automation, K. Stelson and F. Oba (eds),
Boston, MA, 111-117.
Ralston, H. J., Polissar, M. J., Inman, V. T., Close, J. R., and Feinstein, B., 1949, Dynamic features of
human isolated voluntary muscle in isometric and free contractions, Journal of Applied
Physiology, 1, 7, 526-533.
![Page 33: Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systemsbrl.ee.washington.edu/eprints/222/1/Rep162.pdfArtificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022011902/5f0ac5d47e708231d42d44a9/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems
Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford - 33
Riemershma, D. J. and Schamhardt, H. C., 1985, In vitro mechanical properties of equine tendons in
relation to cross-sectional area and collagen content, Research in Veterinary Science, 39, 263-270.
Robinson, D. W., Pratt, J. E., Paluska, D. J. and Pratt, G. A., 1999, September 19-23, Series elastic
actuator development for a biomimetic walking robot, 1999 International Conference on
Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, Atlanta, GA, 561-568.
Schulte, H. F., 1961, The characteristics of the McKibben artificial muscle, The Application of
External Power in Prosthetics and Orthotics, Publication 874, National Academy of Sciences -
National Research Council, Washington DC, Appendix H, 94-115.
Spoor, C. W., van Leeuwen, J. L., Meskers, C. G. M., Titulaer, A. F., and Huson, A., 1990, Estimation
of instantaneous moment arms of lower-leg muscles, Journal of Biomechanics, 23, 12, 1247-1259.
ter Keurs, H. E. D. J., Iwazumi, T., and Pollack, G. H., 1978, The sarcomere length-tension relation in
skeletal muscle, Journal of General Physiology, 72, 565-592.
Tondu, B., Boitier, V., and Lopez, P., 1994, Naturally compliant robot-arms actuated by McKibben
artificial muscles, 1994 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, San
Antonio, TX, 3, 2635-2640.
van der Smagt P., Groen, F., and Schulten, K., 1996, Analysis and control of a rubbertuator arm,
Biological Cybernetics, 75, 433-440.
van der Linde R. Q., 1998, May, Active leg compliance for passive walking, 1998 IEEE International
Conference on Robotics and Automation, Leuen, Belgium, 2339-2344.
Voigt, M., Bojsen-Moller, F., Simonsen, E. B., and Dyhre-Poulsen, P., 1995a, The influence of
Young’s modulus, dimensions, and instantaneous moment arms on the efficiency of human
movement, Journal of Biomechanics, 28, 3, 281-291.
![Page 34: Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systemsbrl.ee.washington.edu/eprints/222/1/Rep162.pdfArtificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022011902/5f0ac5d47e708231d42d44a9/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems
Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford - 34
Voigt, M., Simonsen, E. B., Dyhre-Poulsen, P., and Klausen, K., 1995b, Mechanical and muscular
factors influencing the performance in maximal vertical jumping after different prestretch loads,
Journal of Biomechanics, 28, 3, 293-307.
Webster, D. A. and Werner, F. W., 1983, Mechanical and functional properties of implanted freeze-
dried flexor tendons, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 180, 301-309.
Wells, J. B., 1965, Comparison of mechanical properties between slow and fast mammalian muscle.
Journal of Physiology, 18, 252-269.
Wilkie, D. R., 1950, The relation between force and velocity in human muscle, Journal of Physiology,
K110, 248-280.
Wilkie, D. R., 1956, The mechanical properties of muscle, British Medical Bulletin, 12, 3, 177-182.
Winter D. A., 1990, The Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement, 2nd edition, John
Wiley and Sons, New York.
Winters, J. M., 1995, How detailed should muscle models be to understand multi-joint movement
coordination? Human Movement Science, 14, 401-442.
Woittiez, R. D., Huijing, P. A., Boom, H. B. K. and Rozendal, R. H., 1984, A three-dimensional
muscle model: a quantified relation between form and function of skeletal muscles, Journal of
Morphology, 182, 95-113.
Woo, S. L. Y., Gomez, M. A., Amiel, D., Ritter, M. A., Gelberman, R. H., and Akeson, W. H., 1981,
The effects of exercise on the biomechanical and biochemical properties of swine digital flexor
tendons, Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 103, 51-56.
Wood, J. E., Meek, S. G., and Jacobsen, S. C., 1989, Quantitation of human shoulder anatomy for
prosthetic arm control – I. Surface modeling, Journal of Biomechanics, 22, 3, 273-292.
![Page 35: Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systemsbrl.ee.washington.edu/eprints/222/1/Rep162.pdfArtificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022011902/5f0ac5d47e708231d42d44a9/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems
Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford - 35
Wu, C., Hwang, K., and Chang, S., 1997, Analysis and implementation of a neuromuscular-like
control for robotic compliance, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 5, 6, 586-597.
Yamaguchi, G. T., Sawa, A. G.-U., Moran, D. W., Fessler, M. J., and Winters, J. M., 1990, A survey
of human musculotendon actuator parameters, Multiple Muscle Systems: Biomechanics and
Movement Organization, J. M. Winters, J. M. and S. L.-Y. Woo, (eds), Springer-Verlag, New
York, 717-774.
Yoda, M. and Shiota, Y., 1994, A electromagnetic actuator for a robot working with a man, 3rd IEEE
International Workshop on Robot and Human Communication, Nagoya, Japan, 373-377.
Zahalak, G. I., 1990, Modeling muscle mechanics (and Energetics). Multiple Muscle Systems:
Biomechanics and Movement Organization, J. M. Winters, J. M. and S. L.-Y. Woo, (eds),
Springer-Verlag, 1-23.
Zajac, F. E., 1989, Muscle and tendon: Properties, models, scaling, and application to biomechanics
and motor control, Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, 17, 4, 359-41.
![Page 36: Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systemsbrl.ee.washington.edu/eprints/222/1/Rep162.pdfArtificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022011902/5f0ac5d47e708231d42d44a9/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems
Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford - 36
Figure 1: Schematic of the three-element muscle model (Hill, 1938) and tendon: contractile element
(CE), series elastic element (SE), and parallel elastic element (PE).
��������������������������������������������������������������������
CE SE
TendonPE
Muscle
Hill, 1938
��������������������������������������������������������������������
CE SE
TendonPE
Muscle
Hill, 1938
![Page 37: Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systemsbrl.ee.washington.edu/eprints/222/1/Rep162.pdfArtificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022011902/5f0ac5d47e708231d42d44a9/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems
Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford - 37
Figure 2: Dimensionless relationship between force and length under isometric conditions at maximal
activation for rat, cat, frog, and human compared with predictive skeletal muscle models (see text for
citations).
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.5L / Lo - dimensionless
FL /
FL,o
- di
men
sion
less
Rat
Cat
Frog
Human
Bobbert et al
Woittiez et al.1984
Bobbert & Ingen Schenau1990
Hoy, Zajac, Gordon1990
![Page 38: Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systemsbrl.ee.washington.edu/eprints/222/1/Rep162.pdfArtificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022011902/5f0ac5d47e708231d42d44a9/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems
Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford - 38
Figure 3: Output force at maximal activation over a muscle’s eccentric (lengthening under load,
negative velocity by convention) and concentric (shortening under load, positive velocity by
convention) velocity range for rat, cat, frog, and human compared with predictive skeletal muscle
models (see text for citations).
����������������������������������������������������������������������������������
�������������������������������
0
0.25
0.5
0.75
1
1.25
1.5
1.75
-0.5 -0.25 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1V / VL,o - dimensionless
Fm /
F L,o
- di
men
sion
less
Rat
Cat
Frog
Human
Hof & van den Berg1981
Woittiez et al.1984
Bobbert et al. 1986and
Bobbert & Ingen Schenau 1990
Lehman, 1990
Hatze, 1981
![Page 39: Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systemsbrl.ee.washington.edu/eprints/222/1/Rep162.pdfArtificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022011902/5f0ac5d47e708231d42d44a9/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems
Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford - 39
Figure 4: Published models describing the relationship between stress and strain (see text for citations).
Nearly all experimental evidence is bounded within extremes described by models of Bobbert and van
Ingen Schenau (1990) and Hof (1998).
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0 2 4 6 8 10 12Strain - percent
Stre
ss -
MPa
Bobbert et al.1986
Bobbert & Ingen Schenau1990 Voigt et al.
1995
EST ModelZajac1989
Hof1998
![Page 40: Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systemsbrl.ee.washington.edu/eprints/222/1/Rep162.pdfArtificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022011902/5f0ac5d47e708231d42d44a9/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems
Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford - 40
Figure 5: Flexible pneumatic actuator force (Fa) as a function of normalized length and velocity at an
activation pressure of 5 bar. Actuator presented here was constructed with natural latex rubber bladder
(interior diameter of 12.8 mm, wall thickness of 1.6 mm) and polyester exterior braid (minimum
interior diameter 12.8 mm when stretched taught). Lower activation pressures exhibited proportionally
lower forces but are not shown for clarity. The ripples along the velocity profiles are artifacts of
hydraulic pump used by the testing instrument.
![Page 41: Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systemsbrl.ee.washington.edu/eprints/222/1/Rep162.pdfArtificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022011902/5f0ac5d47e708231d42d44a9/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems
Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford - 41
Figure 6: Dimensionless relationship between force and length under isometric conditions at maximal
activation for rat, cat, frog, and human compared with a flexible pneumatic actuator at 5 bar (see text
for citations).
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.2 1.3L / Lo - dimensionless
FL /
FL,o
- di
men
sion
less
Rat
Cat
Frog
Human
Flexible PneumaticActuator
![Page 42: Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systemsbrl.ee.washington.edu/eprints/222/1/Rep162.pdfArtificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022011902/5f0ac5d47e708231d42d44a9/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems
Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford - 42
Figure 7: Schematic of three-element artificial muscle-tendon actuator. Flexible pneumatic actuator
serves as contractile element, hydraulic damper yields an approximate force-velocity response, and
mechanical tendon acts as energy storage element.
Flexible Pneumatic Actuator
Hydraulic Damper
Mechanical Tendon
����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
Artificial Muscle
Eccentric Orifice
Concentric Orifice
Flexible Pneumatic Actuator
Hydraulic Damper
Mechanical Tendon
����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
Artificial Muscle
Eccentric Orifice
Concentric Orifice
![Page 43: Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systemsbrl.ee.washington.edu/eprints/222/1/Rep162.pdfArtificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022011902/5f0ac5d47e708231d42d44a9/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems
Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford - 43
Figure 8: Experimental set-up for measuring force-length-velocity properties of artificial muscle-
tendon actuator at various pressures. The pneumatic ballast tank ensures pressure within actuator is
independent of length (i.e. volume).
Flexible Pneumatic Actuator
Artificial Tendon
Pneumatic Ballast Tank
Hydraulic Cylinder
MTS Hydraulic Ram
Hydraulic Ballast Chamber
Linear Bearing Race
Artificial Tendon
Linear Bearing Pillow Block
Load Cell
Flexible Pneumatic Actuator
![Page 44: Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systemsbrl.ee.washington.edu/eprints/222/1/Rep162.pdfArtificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022011902/5f0ac5d47e708231d42d44a9/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems
Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford - 44
Figure 9: Theoretical predictions of force-length-velocity relationship for artificial triceps surae in
series with mechanical Achilles tendon for an activation pressure of 5 bar.
![Page 45: Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systemsbrl.ee.washington.edu/eprints/222/1/Rep162.pdfArtificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022011902/5f0ac5d47e708231d42d44a9/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems
Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford - 45
Figure 10: Experimental force-length-velocity results for artificial muscle-tendon actuator at 5 bar.
![Page 46: Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systemsbrl.ee.washington.edu/eprints/222/1/Rep162.pdfArtificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022011902/5f0ac5d47e708231d42d44a9/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems
Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford - 46
Figure 11: Force versus velocity experimental results (solid lines) plotted with model predictions
(dotted lines) at 5 bar for three muscle-tendon lengths (310, 330, and 350 mm).
L=35
0 m
m
L=33
0 m
m
L=31
0 m
m
![Page 47: Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systemsbrl.ee.washington.edu/eprints/222/1/Rep162.pdfArtificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022011902/5f0ac5d47e708231d42d44a9/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems
Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford - 47
Table 1: Isometric force v. length data from the literature. 1k 2k 3k oL oLF , Rat1 -4.50 8.95 -3.45 27.0 mm 0.29 N p≤0.001 Frog2 -6.79 14.69 -6.88 31.0 mm 0.67 N r2=0.96 Cat3 -5.71 11.52 -4.81 31.9 mm 0.18 N r2=0.99 Human4 -13.43 28.23 -13.96 215.9 mm 193.1 N r2=0.75 Skeletal Muscle Model5
-6.25 12.50 -5.25 60.0 mm 3000 N
1 Bahler (1968) equation 16. Rat gracilis anticus muscle at 17.5 degrees C. Bahler’s equation is valid over the range oo LLL ⋅≤≤⋅ 2.17.0 . Bahler fitted the data using a “least mean square fit (significant to p ≤ 0.001).”
2 Wilkie (1956) data from figures 2 and 4. Frog sartorius muscle at 0 degrees C. For Wilkie’s data, oo LLL ⋅≤≤⋅ 34.168.0 is valid.
3 McCrorey et al. (1966) data from figures 6 (controlled-release data) and 10. Cat tenuissimus muscle at 37 degrees C. For McCrorey’s data, oo LLL ⋅≤≤⋅ 35.173.0 is valid. 4 Ralston et al. (1949) data from figure 5. Human pectoralis major, sternal portion at 37 degrees C. Caveats include: (1) results are not that of isolated muscle as the insertion tendon is necessarily included, (2) Ralston did not report muscle length so the results presented here used data from a single cadaver (Wood et al., 1989), and (3) performance of residual amputee muscles may not be the same as those of intact individuals. Wilkie (1950) estimated the length change of Ralston’s data to be three times less than normal and the peak isometric force to be five times less than normal. For Ralston’s data, oo LLL ⋅≤≤⋅ 28.182.0 is valid. 5 Woittiez et al. (1984) equation A-23. Constants for Woittiez model of skeletal muscle were chosen based on frog experiments by Gordon et al., 1966; Hill, 1953; and ter Keurs et al., 1978. Other published skeletal muscle models include Bobbert et al. (1986), Bobbert and Ingen Schenau (1990), and Hoy et al. (1990). The model of Bobbert et al. (1986) uses the same values as Woittiez and co-workers. The models of Bobbert and Ingen Schenau, (1990) and Hoy et al. (1990) both conform to the general parabolic shape, but neither provides a mathematical equation.
![Page 48: Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systemsbrl.ee.washington.edu/eprints/222/1/Rep162.pdfArtificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022011902/5f0ac5d47e708231d42d44a9/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems
Klute, Czerniecki, and Hannaford - 48
Table 2: Force v. velocity data from the literature. oLFa , - none oLF , - N oLVb ,/ - none oLV , - mm/s Rat1 0.356 4.30 0.38 144 Frog2 0.27 0.67 0.28 42 Cat3 0.27 0.18 0.30 191 Human4 0.81 200 0.81 1115 Skeletal Muscle Model5
0.224 0.224
Human6 0.41 3000 0.39 756 Human7 0.41 2430 0.41 780 Human8 0.12 0.12
1Wells (1965) table 1. Rat tibialis anterior muscle at 38 degrees C. 2Abbott and Wilkie (1953) their figure 5. Frog sartorius muscle at 0 degrees C. 3McCrorey et al. (1966) their figure 1. Cat tenuissimus muscle at 37 degrees C. 4Ralston et al., (1949) their figure 1; but see also Wilkie (1950). Human pectoralis major in-vivo, sternal portion at 37 degrees C. 5Woittiez et al. (1984) their equations A-22 and B-8. Model of generic skeletal muscle. Woittiez’s dimensionless model did not require the specification of oLF , or oLV , . 6Bobbert et al. (1986). Model of human triceps surae. 7Bobbert and van Ingen Schenau (1990). Model of human triceps surae. 8Hof and van den Berg (1981). Model of human triceps surae. Hof and ven den Berg’s model also did not require the specification o f oLF , or oLV , .