Articular Hypermobility in Icelandic 12-Year-olds
description
Transcript of Articular Hypermobility in Icelandic 12-Year-olds
10/1/13 Articular hypermobility in Icelandic 12-year-olds
rheumatology.oxfordjournals.org/content/38/10/1014.long 1/5
+
Received March 31, 1998.; Revision received January 28, 1999.
Oxford Journals Medicine Rheumatology Volume 38, Issue 10 Pp. 1014-1016.
Rheumatologyrheumatology.oxfordjournals.org
Rheumatology (1999) 38 (10): 1014-1016. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/38.10.1014
Articular hypermobility in Icelandic 12-year-olds
A. Qvindes land and H. Jónsson
Author Affiliations
H. Jónsson, Landspítalinn University Hospital, 101 Reykjavík, Iceland.
Abstract
Objective. To examine the prevalence of articular hypermobility and its
relationship to musculoskeletal pain in Icelandic 12-yr-olds, and to obtain
baseline data for a prospective study on the subject.
Methods. A total of 267 12-yr-olds were examined for articular
hypermobility by the Beighton criteria. The children also answered a
questionnaire concerning musculoskeletal pain and injuries, sports and
musical activity.
Results. The prevalence of hypermobility (defined as ≥4 Beighton criteria)
was 40.5% in girls and 12.9% in boys. Despite slight trends for
hypermobile subjects to be less active in sports and to report more joint
pain, no correlation could be found between hypermobility and
musculoskeletal symptoms.
Conclusions. An unusually marked sex difference in hypermobility exists
among Icelandic 12-yr-olds, but hypermobility does not seem to affect
joint symptoms or leisure activities at this age.
Key words Hypermobility Children Musculoskeletal pain Sports activity.
Articular hypermobility is a graded phenomenon which runs in families
and is affected by many factors, including age and sex [1]. The clinical
implications of this condition and its relationship to musculoskeletal
symptoms are a matter of considerable controversy. Several studies have
indicated an association with musculoskeletal pain [2, 3] and sports
injuries [4, 5]. Others, however, report no such association [6, 7].
The question of whether some hypermobile subjects are at risk of
developing musculoskeletal pain problems and injuries is highly relevant
with regard to screening and installation of preventive measures. We
present here the baseline results in a prospective study analysing this
relationship.
Methods
The participants were 267 schoolchildren, 143 girls and 124 boys, who
were due for their 12-yr-old health check-up, carried out at this point in
the Icelandic school and health system. A school nurse used a standard
questionnaire to record the children's participation in the school's physical
education, sports (type and frequency) and musical activity, along with
musculoskeletal pain, luxations and sprains.
About the Index
Show related links
10/1/13 Articular hypermobility in Icelandic 12-year-olds
rheumatology.oxfordjournals.org/content/38/10/1014.long 2/5
View larger version:
In this page In a new window
Download as PowerPoint Slide
View this table:
In this window In a new window
The medical examination was performed by a single observer (AQ) and
consisted of assessment of hypermobility according to the Beighton
criteria [8]. In addition, the presence or absence of the palmaris longus
muscle was examined clinically and the grip width (defined as the
maximum distance between the tips of the thumb and fifth finger on a
ruler) measured.
Statistics
The χ2 test was used for comparison between groups, and the Spearman
rank correlation test (Rs) for correlation.
The study has been approved by the Icelandic Data Protection
Commission.
Results
The prevalence of articular hypermobility (≥4 Beighton criteria) was 40.5%
among the girls and 12.9% among the boys. Corresponding figures for ≥6
criteria were 14 and 4.8%. The overall prevalence of each criterion varied
from 20 to 39% and all were more common in girls, with the exception of
90° extension in the fifth metacarpal joint, which was similar in the sexes
(Fig. 1⇔). Hypermobility was slightly more common on the left side
(331/1068 vs 279/1068 on the right; P=0.02), but this was mainly due to
the difference between the left and right fifth metacarpal extension
criteria (97/267 vs 61/267; P<0.001).
F IG. 1.
Prevalence of each Beighton
criterion for both sexes.
There was a slight non-significant trend for hypermobile subjects to be
less active in sports (64% vs 69%; Table 1⇔) and to report more
musculoskeletal pain (55% vs 51%). A similar trend was seen for reported
pain frequency (Rs pain frequency vs Beighton score 0.11; P=0.06). The
`palms on the floor' criterion was more common in those reporting sports
activity (48/180 vs 8/87; P<0.01), but otherwise we did not find any
associations between particular joints and the clinical data. Thus,
hypermobility of hand or knee joints was not associated with pain in these
areas. No difference was found with regard to the school's physical
education programme, musical activity, type of sports, luxations or ankle
sprains.
TABLE 1.
Sports, musical activity and
musculoskeletal symptoms
in relation to articular
hypermobility (percentages in parentheses)
Grip width correlated positively with the Beighton score (Rs 0.23,
P<0.001), but no association was found between hypermobility and either
unilateral (12.3%) or bilateral (11.6%) absence of the palmaris longus
muscle.
Discussion
10/1/13 Articular hypermobility in Icelandic 12-year-olds
rheumatology.oxfordjournals.org/content/38/10/1014.long 3/5
In this study of 267 Icelandic 12-yr-old schoolchildren, the prevalence of
articular hypermobility (≥4 Beighton criteria) was 40.5% among the girls
and 12.9% among the boys. Despite a slight tendency towards less sports
activity and more reported pain in hypermobile subjects, no evidence was
found to suggest that hypermobility affects joint symptoms or leisure
activities at this age.
There is an unusually marked sex difference in articular hypermobility in
Icelandic children, with the girls registering the highest prevalence in
Caucasian populations [6, 7, 9, 10]. This is particularly noteworthy
compared to the less pronounced sex difference found in Finnish
schoolchildren by Mikkelsson et al. [6], using similar methods. The
children in the present study were slightly older (average age 12.4 yr
compared with their two groups of 9.8 and 11.8 yr), and it is conceivable
that growth and hormonal effects at this age may have some bearing on
the sex-related differences, but otherwise the differences between the
populations remain unexplained. On the other hand, the two studies are
in total agreement with regard to the lack of association with
musculoskeletal symptoms, both regional and general, in this age group.
The studies of Larsson and co-workers [11, 12] indicate that
hypermobility of peripheral joints and spine could be favourable in
occupations requiring frequent movement of affected joints, but
unfavourable in less frequently used joint regions where stability may be
more important. However, the complex relationship between
hypermobility and the development of diverse musculoskeletal pain
problems and fibromyalgia [2, 3], sports injuries [4, 5] and the later
development of osteoarthritis [13] is insufficiently understood on the
basis of current data, which are mainly cross-sectional. Therefore, it
seems extremely relevant to follow this group prospectively. We have
recently described a subset of hand osteoarthritis with mainly thumb base
affection which is related to articular hypermobility in Icelandic females
[14]. This has not been described in other populations, although we have
found a similar trend in Swedish patients operated on for thumb base
osteoarthritis [15]. There is also evidence to suggest that musculoskeletal
pain and fibromyalgia have a high prevalence in Iceland [16].
Current evidence suggests that the `palms on the floor' criterion is
trainable [5]. It is possible, however, that inactivity may contribute to
increased laxity at the other sites, as suggested by increased left side
prevalence, a finding previously reported by Beighton and others [8, 17,
18]. This would be in concordance with studies reporting that post-
traumatic joint instability can be improved by training [19].
The palmaris longus muscle was tested as a possible marker of evolution;
the hypothesis being that humans are developing increased mobility at
the cost of stability. No such association was found, proving that Mother
Nature is still wonderfully unpredictable. The grip width measurement is
widely used in evaluation of hand surgery. The association found here is a
confirmation of recent findings by members of our group [15].
The association between articular hypermobility and subsequent
development of musculoskeletal problems appears to be of considerable
importance with regard to preventive measures. Should adolescents be
guided in their choice of sports or other activities? If we can identify those
who are particularly at risk, then screening procedures would be
indicated. These questions can only be answered through prospective
follow-up and the current study gives us a platform of baseline data for
these purposes.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank our colleagues Atli Árnason, Halldór Jónsson and
10/1/13 Articular hypermobility in Icelandic 12-year-olds
rheumatology.oxfordjournals.org/content/38/10/1014.long 4/5
Jens Magnússon, along with their staff, for every assistance they have
given us in the course of this study.
© 1999 British Society for Rheumatology
References
1. Klemp P. Hypermobility. Ann Rheum Dis 1997;56:573–5.FREE Full Text
2. Arroyo IL, Brewer EJ, Giannini EH. Arthritis/arthralgia and hypermobility of the jointsin schoolchildren. J Rheumatol 1988;15:978–80.
Medline Web of Science
3. Gedalia A, Press J, Klein M, Buskila D. Joint hypermobility and fibromyalgia inschoolchildren. Ann Rheum Dis 1993;52:494–6.
Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. Diaz MA, Estevez EC, Guijo PS. Joint hyperlaxity and musculoligamentous lesions:Study of a population of homogeneous age, sex and physical exertion. Br JRheumatol 1993;32:120–2.
Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. Klemp P, Stevens JE, Isaacs S. A hypermobility study in ballet dancers. J Rheumatol1984;11:692–6.
Medline Web of Science
6. Mikkelsson M, Salminen JJ, Kautiainen H. Joint hypermobility is not a contributingfactor to musculoskeletal pain in pre-adolescents. J Rheumatol 1996;23:1963–7.
Medline Web of Science
7. Birrell FN, Adebajo AO, Hazleman BL, Silman A. High prevalence of joint laxity inWest Africans. Br J Rheumatol 1994;33:56–9.
Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. Beighton P, Solomon L, Soskolne CL. Articular mobility in an African population. AnnRheum Dis 1973, 32:413–8.
FREE Full Text
9. Larsson LG, Baum J, Mudholkar GS. Hypermobility: features and differentialincidence between the sexes. Arthritis Rheum 1987;30:1426–30.
Medline Web of Science
10. Wordsworth P, Ogilvie D, Smith R, Sykes B. Joint mobility with particular reference toracial variation and inherited connective tissue disorders. Br J Rheumatol1987;26:9–12.
Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. Larsson LG, Baum J, Mudholkar GS, Kollia GD. Benefits and disadvantages of jointhypermobility among musicians. N Engl J Med 1993;329:1079–82.
CrossRef Medline Web of Science
12. Larsson LG, Mudholkar GS, Baum J, Srivastava DK. Benefits and liabilities ofhypermobility in the back pain disorders of industrial workers. J Int Med1995;238:461–7.
Medline Web of Science
13. Scott D, Bird H, Wright V. Joint laxity leading to osteoarthrosis. Rheumatol Rehabil1979;18:167–9.
Medline Web of Science
14. Jónsson H, Valtýsdóttir STh, Kjartansson Ó, Brekkan Á. Hypermobility associatedwith osteoarthritis of the thumb base: a clinical and radiological subset of handosteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 1996;55:540–3.
Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. Albertsson MP, Jónsson H. Hypermobility features in patients operated for thumbbase osteoarthritis. Scand J Rheumatol 1996;26(suppl. 106):41.
16. Birgisson H, Jónsson H, Geirsson AJ. The prevalence of fibromyalgia and chronicwidespread musculoskeletal pain in Iceland (Abstract in English). Iceland Med J1998;84:636–42.
17. Pountain G. Musculoskeletal pain in Omanis, and the relationship to joint mobilityand body mass index. Br J Rheumatol 1992;31:81–5.
Abstract/FREE Full Text
10/1/13 Articular hypermobility in Icelandic 12-year-olds
rheumatology.oxfordjournals.org/content/38/10/1014.long 5/5
Online ISSN 1462-0332 - Print ISSN 1462-0324
Other Oxford University Press sites:
Oxford University Press
Site Map Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Legal Notices Frequently Asked Questions
18. Al-Rawi ZS, Al-Aszawi AJ, Al-Chalabi T. Joint mobility among university students inIraq. Br J Rheumatol 1985;24:326–31.
Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. Wester JU, Jespersen SM, Nielsen KD, Neumann L. Wobble board training afterpartial sprains of the lateral ligaments of the ankle: a prospective randomizedstudy. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1996;23:332–6.
Medline Web of Science
Articles citing this article
Fifteen minute consultation: A structured approach to the management of hypermobility in a
child
EDUCATION AND PRACTICE (2013) 0 (2013): archdischild-2013-303882v-edpract-2013-303882
Abstract Full Text (HTML)
Joint hypermobility syndrome in childhood. A not so benign multisystem disorder?
Rheumatology (Oxford) (2005) 44 (6): 744-750
Abstract Full Text (HTML) Full Text (PDF)
Benign joint hypermobility in childhood
Rheumatology (Oxford) (2001) 40 (5): 489-491
Full Text (HTML) Full Text (PDF)
Prevalence of articular hypermobility in schoolchildren: a one-district study in Barcelona
Rheumatology (Oxford) (2000) 39 (10): 1153
Full Text (HTML) Full Text (PDF)
Copyright © 2013 British Society for Rheumatology