Artcle12 vs Right to Privcy
-
Upload
nilesh-shreedhar -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of Artcle12 vs Right to Privcy
-
8/16/2019 Artcle12 vs Right to Privcy
1/29
1
Analysis of Article 21 vis a vis Right to
privacy
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TOPIC
ACKNOWLEDMENT
-
8/16/2019 Artcle12 vs Right to Privcy
2/29
2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF CASES
CHAPTER-1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Introductory
1.2 Reserc! Met!odo"o#y
1.$ O%&ect'(e o) t!e *ro&ect
1.+ ,y-ot!es's
1. Mode o) c'tt'on
1./ L'terture Sur(ey
1.0 Sco-e nd L''tt'on
1. C!-ter'3t'on *"nn'n#
CHAPTER-2
ARTICLE 21 OF T,E INDIAN CONSTITUTION4 C,ARTER OF
UNARTICULATED RI5,TS
2.1 R'#!t to L')e nd *erson" L'%erty
2.2 R'#!t to -r'(cy4 Unrt'cu"ted r'#!t under Art'c"e 21
CHAPTER-3
CONCE*TUAL ANAL6SIS OF RI5,T TO *RI7AC6
$.1 De)'n't'on o) *r'(cy
$.2 C!rcter'st'cs o) *r'(cy
$.$ 5rounds o) t!e r'#!t to -r'(cy
CHAPTER-4
-
8/16/2019 Artcle12 vs Right to Privcy
3/29
3
TRACIN5 T,E ORI5IN OF RI5,T TO *RI7AC6 IN INDIA T,ROU5,
CASE ANAL6SIS
+.1 R'#!t to -r'(cy 'n t!e "'#!t 8ud'c'" ct'('s
+.1.1 T!e Mne9 T!es's
+.1.2 De(e"o-ent o) r'#!t to -r'(cy )ter Mne9 Cse
+.2 T--'n# o) Te"e-!one nd t!e r'#!t to -r'(cy
+.$ Mr't" nd se:u" -r'(cy
CHAPTER-5
Conc"us'on
B'%"'o#r-!y
CHAPTER-1
INTRODUCTION
-
8/16/2019 Artcle12 vs Right to Privcy
4/29
4
T!e Const'tut'on o) Ind' -ro('des t!e "'st o) #urnteed )undent" r'#!ts under *rt III;
nd t!e M#n Crt on# t!ese r'#!ts 's Art'c"e 21;
-erson" "'%erty. Art'c"e 21; ') red "'ter""y; 's co"our"ess rt'c"e nd
'nd'('du" to est%"'s! 'nd'('du" %oundr'es
St'"" "ot ore !s to %e done )or t!e reco#n't'on nd -rotect'on o) -r'(cy %y "< 'n Ind'.
As tter o) )ct; t!'s conce-t 's ?u'et 'n -r''t'(e st#e o) 'ts de(e"o-ent. ,o
R'#!t 'n(o"(es t!e e:tent to
cred't
-
8/16/2019 Artcle12 vs Right to Privcy
5/29
5
"'en to Ind'n Cu"ture1. In t!e ce"e%rted cse o) ADM Jabalpur V. Shivkant Shukla2 , t!e
Su-ree Court sou#!t to deter'ne ') t!e r'#!t to -erson" "'%erty 's "''ted %y; ny
"''tt'ons ot!er t!n t!ose e:-ress"y cont'ned 'n t!e Const'tut'on nd t!e sttute "
-
8/16/2019 Artcle12 vs Right to Privcy
6/29
ARTICLE 21 OF T,E INDIAN CONSTITUTION4
C,ARTER OF UNARTICULATED RI5,TS
2.1 Right to Life an Pe!"ona# Li$e!t%&
Right to life and personal Liberty: No -erson s!"" %e de-r'(ed o) !'s "')e or -erson"
"'%erty e:ce-t ccord'n# to -rocedure est%"'s!ed %y "
"ed'n# cse under t!e ndte o) Art'c"e 21.
*ost 5o-"n cse t!e scenr'o 'n res-ect o) sco-e o) Art'c"e 21 !s %een e:-nded or
od')'ed #rdu""y t!rou#! d'))erent dec's'ons o) t!e A-e: Court nd 't
e:'ned
A!R 15 ' 20" A!R 10 ' 50"1 A!R 11 ' 04"
-
8/16/2019 Artcle12 vs Right to Privcy
7/29
-
8/16/2019 Artcle12 vs Right to Privcy
8/29
As resu"t o) e:-ns'on o) t!e sco-e o) Art'c"e 21; t!e *u%"'c Interest L't'#t'ons 'n res-ect
r'#!t to -r'(cy; o) c!'"dren 'n &'" %e'n# ent't"ed to s-ec'" -rotect'on; !e"t! !3rds due to
-o""ut'on nd !r)u" dru#s; !ous'n# )or %e##rs; 'ed'te ed'c" 'd to 'n&ured -ersons;
str(t'on det!s; t!e r'#!t to 9no
reson%"e; )'r nd suc! "
o) t!e Const'tut'on.1
2.2 Right to '!i(a)%& an *na!ti)*#ate !ight *ne! the +anate of
A!ti)#e 21&
In t!'s %c9#round o) t!e e:-nded sco-e o) Art'c"e 21 coes t!e d'ens'on o) r'#!t to
-r'(cy.
As W'""' Dou#"s o%ser(es; =t!e r'#!t to %e "et "one 's 'ndeed t!e %e#'nn'n# o) ""
)reedos.>1/ A"t!ou#! 't 's concerned
-
8/16/2019 Artcle12 vs Right to Privcy
9/29
3.1 ,efinition of '!i(a)%&
T!e
nd 'nd'('du"s; %ut s!re %s'c coon t!ees.
*r'(cy 'n #ener" ens t!e r'#!t to %e "et "one. 8ust'ce Coo"ey )'rst co'ned 't 'n 1.
Su" Wrren nd Loues Brnde's )o""o
stte.22 Den *rosser 2$ !s o-'ned t!t -r'(cy 's not n 'nde-endent ("ue t "" %ut
co-os'te 'nterest 'n re-utt'on; eot'on" trn?u'""'ty nd 'ntn#'%"e -ro-erty. Accord'n# to
!'; )o""o
-
8/16/2019 Artcle12 vs Right to Privcy
10/29
1
tort o) 'n(s'on o) -r'(cy %ut on"y ne< ax&ell$ London $ 1$
pp(323(333"20 0l*stead v. US, 200 U' 43 E127"2 Rayond ?ac:s$ 9he "rote!tion of "riva!+4, '&eet and >ax&ell$ London$ 1$ p(13"
http://www.cili.in/http://www.cili.in/
-
8/16/2019 Artcle12 vs Right to Privcy
11/29
11
1. 4rivacy as consisting in being let alone.
T!ere re ny (ers'ons o) t!'s ccount; t!t o) Wrren nd Brnde's; "t!ou#! "'n9ed
en'n#)u" outs'de o) soc'et'es.
). "riva!+ as the la!k of dis!losure, and the ri/ht to 3riva!+ as the ri/ht
to sele!tive dis!losureT!e de)'n't'on o) -r'(cy de)ended 'n !ere 's t!t -r'(cy 's contro" o(er
t!e (r'ous -rts o) us cn %e sensed %y ot!ers.$
In ters o) t!'s #ener" ('e< t!t t!e r'#!t to -r'(cy 's t!e r'#!t o) t!e 'nd'('du" to
deter'ne
re o%('ous -ro%"es !ere; -ro%"es re"t'n# to r9'n# o)) t!e se") nd 'ts re" e:tens'ons
)ro t!e nonse"); nd to s!o
'-"'es t!t se")d'sc"osure cn 'n(o"(e ne't!er 'n(s'ons nor "oss o) -r'(cy; nd )urt!er; t!t
!%'tut'on to 'n(s'ons nd "oss o) -r'(cy t!t "eds to c?u'escence nd e(en consent to
suc! 'n(s'ons; cuses t!e to %ecoe ne't!er 'n(s'ons nor "osses o) -r'(cy. 6et -rt o) t!t
2 Fp" cit 2"3 R" B" ,ar:er$ *A )e
-
8/16/2019 Artcle12 vs Right to Privcy
12/29
12
%out
un'(ers't'es; e-"oyers; %n9s; cred'tors; nd ny ot!ers;
nd t!ey see9 to )oster 'n t!ose
to suc! 'n(s'ons o) t!e'r -r'(cy. C"er"y; t!ere re cons'der%"e d'))'cu"t'es t!en 'n t!e
:. "riva!+ as the a;sen!e of 3u;li!it+2
T!'s 9'nd o) t!'n9'n# %out -r'(cy 'n ters o) se"ect'(e d'sc"osure !s "so "ed to t!e
su##est'on t!t -r'(cy cons'sts 'n t!e %sence o) -u%"'c'ty %out oneHs -erson; oneHs ))'rs;
nd t!e "'9e. Cert'n"y; t!ose concerned not t!ey -u%"'c'3e
t!e coun'c%"e 9no
r'#!t to -r'(cy ent't"es one to e:c"ude ot!ers )ro
-
8/16/2019 Artcle12 vs Right to Privcy
13/29
13
c""ed -r'(cy r'#!ts re re""y c"uster o) der'(t'(e r'#!ts; r'#!ts 'n ny cses der'(t'(e
)ro or n"o#ous
*r'(cy nd secrecy re o%('ous"y d'st'nct; so t!t to res-ect secrecy 's not necessr'"y to
res-ect -r'(cy; to )orce t!e d'(u"#'n# o)
do
("ues o) res-ect; "o(e nd )r'ends!'- 'n -rt'cu"r. ,e see9s to %se t!e r'#!t to -r'(cy on
t!e r'#!t to res-ect; nd on t!e ("ue nd -oss'%'"'ty o) "o(e nd )r'ends!'-; t!ese %e'n# %sed
on t!e or"'ty o) res-ect )or -ersons; t!e r'#!t to -r'(cy %e'n# seen s n s-ect o) t!e r'#!t
to res-ect s -erson. T!us; !e
33 6" 6" +hoson$ *+he Right to ,rivacy.$ "hiloso3h+ and "u;li! @airs 4$ 9o" 4 E'uer!057$ pp(25(314"
34 " Gried$ *,rivacy.$ Aale Law Journal$ 00$ 9o" 3 E6anuary 10(7$ pp(405(43"35 " Gried$. An Anatoy of /alues8 ,robles of ,ersonal and 'ocial hoice *$Ca*;rid/e2 Harvard$ !0"
-
8/16/2019 Artcle12 vs Right to Privcy
14/29
14
-r'(cy re &ust')'%"e;
'n(s'on o) -r'(cy; t!t co-enst'on %y
se:u" conduct; et'n#; dr'n9'n#; ncestry; nd #r'e) nd so on; y or y not %e tters o)
-r'(cy. In our soc'ety; uc! t!t )orty yers #o
-r'nc'-"e o) res-ect )or -r'(cy 's t!t o) H'n('o"te -erson"'tyH. T!e -r'(te 's seen to re"te
not to e(eryt!'n# nd nyt!'n# %out t!e 'nd'('du" %ut to !' s -erson nd s un'?ue
-erson. Suc! n ccount o) -r'(cy 'n ters o) ccess to;
-
8/16/2019 Artcle12 vs Right to Privcy
15/29
15
9'ns!'-; "o(e; )r'ends!'-; !ed o) -r'(cy. T!ey y; s 'n "o(e; rr'#e; t!e )'"y; see9 to
crete "r#er se");
CHAPTER-4
TRACIN5 T,E ORI5IN OF RI5,T TO *RI7AC6 IN
INDIA T,ROU5, CASE ANAL6SIS
30 @"6" >c los:ey$ *,rivacy and the right to ,rivacy.$ Ca*;rid/e Universit+ "ress, /ol"55$ 9o" 211$ 6an 1$ pp10(3"
-
8/16/2019 Artcle12 vs Right to Privcy
16/29
1
T!e Ind'n const'tut'on does not #urntee t!e r'#!t to -r'(cy s )undent" r'#!t. In our
country; t!e so"e cred't #oes to &ud'c'ry )or reco#n'3'n# t!e conce-t o) -r'(cy %ecuse
ne't!er t!e Const'tut'on nor ny ot!er sttute 'n our country de)'ned t!'s conce-t. St'"" "ot
ore !s to %e done )or t!e reco#n't'on nd -rotect'on o) -r'(cy %y "< 'n Ind'. As tter
o) )ct t!'s conce-t 's ?u'et 'n -r''t'(e st#e o) 'ts de(e"o-ent. But 'ts de(e"o-ent 's %ound !(e treendous e))ect on t!e 'nd'('du"@s "'('n#.$ T!e stru##"e to s-ec')'c""y
'ncor-orte -r'(cy s s-ec')'c )undent" r'#!t under t!e Const'tut'on 's su%stnt'""y
ttr'%ut%"e; 'n t!e "r#e esure; to t!e or-!ous c!rcter o) t!'s r'#!t $.
4.1 Right to '!i(a)% *ne! /*i)ia# a)ti(i"+&
A""!%d ,'#! Court 'n 8ihal -hand v. 3haan Dei,59 too9 )'rst ste-
'nde-endent e:'stence o) t!e r'#!t to -r'(cy s eer#'n# )ro t!e custo nd trd't'ons o)
t!e -eo-"e %es'des %e'n# sttutory r'#!t. It o%ser(ed4
&he right to privacy based on social custo!...is different fro! right to privacy based
on natural !odesty and hu!an !orality, the later is not confined to any class, creed,
colour or race and it is a birth right of any hu!an being and is sacred and should be
observed. he right should not be e0ercised in an oppressive ay.$
T!en 'n; M.4. Shar!a v. Satish -handra ,51
-ro('s'ons
11d; 11e nd 21. T!e &or'ty o) t!e &ud#es -rt'c'-t'n# 'n t!e dec's'on s'd o) t!er'#!t to -r'(cy t!t =Our Const'tut'on does not 'n ters con)er ny "'9e const'tut'on"
#urntee.>+$ On t!e ot!er !nd; t!e 'nor'ty o-'n'on Su%% Ro; 8. ishra$ *Right to ,rivacy8 An Analysis of )evelopental,rocess in !ndia$ Aerica and #urope.$ Central India Law 5uarterl+, ta:en fro &&&"cili"inon th 6anuary 21"3 9ait Fberoi$ *+he Right to ,rivacy8 +racing the 6udicial Approach Gollo&ing thehara: 'ingh ase.$ ta:en fro &&&"indla&"co on 16anuary 21"4 A!R 135 All" 2"
41 14 'R 100"42 A!R 13 ' 125"43 !bid"$ at 13"
http://www.cili.in/http://www.indlaw.com/http://www.cili.in/http://www.indlaw.com/
-
8/16/2019 Artcle12 vs Right to Privcy
17/29
10
'n)err'n# t!e r'#!t to -r'(cy )ro t!e e:-ress'on =-erson" "'%erty> 'n Art'c"e 21. In t!e
t!e re#u"t'on 'n ?uest'on +
44 !bid"$ at 13"45 A!R 105 ' 130"4 !bid$ at 135"40 !bid"$ at 13"4 Air 15 ' 24"4 !n an Aerican case$ Jane Roe v. Henr+ 6ade, 41 U' 113$ the U' 'upree ourt has
observed regarding the right to privacy8*Although the onstitution of the U'A does not explicitly ention any right of privacy$ the U' 'upree ourt recognies that a right of personal privacy$ or a
-
8/16/2019 Artcle12 vs Right to Privcy
18/29
1
T!e r'#!t to -r'(cy !(e se(er" s-ects. One suc! s-ect 's t!e r'#!t to -rocrete. T!'s 's
"so 9no. T!e r'#!t to use condos; t!e r'#!t o)
guarantee of certain areas or ones of privacy$ does exist under the onstitution$and the roots of that ay be found in the Girst Aendent$ in the fourth and the
-
8/16/2019 Artcle12 vs Right to Privcy
19/29
1
T!e r'#!t to -r'(cy !s no< %ecoe est%"'s!ed 'n Ind'; %ut s -rt o) Art'c"e 21 nd not
s n 'nde-endent r'#!t 'n 'tse"); s suc! r'#!t; %y 'tse"); !s not %een 'dent')'ed under t!e
Const'tut'on. T!e Court !s !oT!'s ens
4.1.1 The 0anea The"i"&T!e &ur's-rudent'" ed')'ce o) t!e d'st'nct'on %et
e:erc'se o) t!e ned )undent" r'#!t 's not necessr'"y co-re!ended 'n t!t )undent"
r'#!t. S'nce; t!e r'#!t to -r'(cy 's not ned r'#!t; 'n order to %ecoe -rt o) t!e ned
r'#!t to personal liberty? ; t!'s !s to %e s!o -ro-os't'ons re4
54 6"9 ,andey$ Constitutional Law of India, entral La& Agency$ Allahabad$ 42nd ed"$ 25$p(220"55 E107 1' 24"5 A!R 10 ' 50$ 4"50 A!R 12 ' 101"
5 9ait Fberoi$ *+he right to ,rivacy8 tracing the 6udicial Approach follo&ing the hara:'ingh.$ &&&"indla&"co on 1th 6anuary 21"5 A!R 15 ' 24"
http://www.indlaw.com/http://www.indlaw.com/
-
8/16/2019 Artcle12 vs Right to Privcy
20/29
2
=1 t!e r'#!t to -r'(cy 's '-"'c't 'n t!e r'#!t to "')e nd "'%erty #urnteed to t!e
c't'3ens o) t!'s country %y Art'c"e 21. It 's =r'#!t to %e "e)t "one>. A c't'3en !s
r'#!t to s)e#urd t!e -r'(cy o) !'s o
"'%"e 'n n ct'on )or d#es. *os't'on y !o
T!'s so e(en
e%er o) t!e -ress nd ed' to -ro(e t!t !e cted )ter reson%"e (er')'ct'on
o) )cts; 't 's not necessry )or !' to -ro(e t!t
n'os'ty; t!e de)endnt
re-resents e:ce-t'on to t!'s ru"e.
+ So )r s t!e #o(ernent; "oc" ut!or'ty nd ot!er or#ns nd 'nst'tut'ons
e:erc's'n# #o(ernent" -o
-
8/16/2019 Artcle12 vs Right to Privcy
21/29
21
Ru"e $ nd + do not; !o
-
8/16/2019 Artcle12 vs Right to Privcy
22/29
22
const'tut'on""y -er'ss'%"e 'n Ind' I) so;
!'#! !nded 'nter)erence %y t--'n# o) t!e con(erst'on %y -o"'ce. But t!e -rotect'on 's not
)or t!e #u'"ty #'nst t!e e))ort o) t!e -o"'ce to ('nd'cte t!e " T!e r'#!t to !o"d te"e-!one con(erst'on 's t!e -r'(cy o) one@s !oe or o))'ce
. Con(erst'ons on
te"e-!one re o)ten o) n 'nt'te nd con)'dent'" nture. Te"e-!one con(erst'on 's -rt o)
odern@s n "')e. T--'n# o) te"e-!ones 's ser'ous 'n(s'on o) -r'(cy. =R'#!t to -r'(cy
T!'sens t!t te"e-!one t--'n#
s''"r ters. T!e court !s ccord'n#"y 'nter-reted Art'c"e21 'n con)or'ty
-
8/16/2019 Artcle12 vs Right to Privcy
23/29
23
4.3 0a!ita# an Se*a# P!i(a)%&Mr't" nd se:u" -r'(cy ente )ro t!e -enu%rs o) s-ec')'c const'tut'on" #urntees.
In (risold v. -onnecticut =7 Mr. 8ust'ce Dou#"s conceded const'tut'on" %s's )or r'#!t to
-r'(cy 'n )reedo o) ssoc't'on. ,e s'd; =Mrr'#e 's co'n# )or %etter or )or t!e reedy o) rest'tut'on o) con&u#" r'#!ts -osed t!e ?uest'on o) r't" -r'(cy e:tent. T!e
And!r *rdes! ,'#! Court 'n . Sareetha v. . Venkatasubbaiah=) ?us!ed 't s str9est
)or o) #o(ernent 'n(s'on o) -erson" 'dent'ty nd 'nd'('du" 3one o) 'nt'te dec's'ons
-rotected under Art'c"e 21@. *.A. C!ud!ury )or t!e Court ('e
e:erc'se o) -o
-
8/16/2019 Artcle12 vs Right to Privcy
24/29
24
conse?uent'" d'scr''nt'on 'n e(ery
-ros-ect'(e s-ouse su))er'n# )ro AIDS nd !s '#nored t!e )ct t!t t!e ot!er -ros-ect'(e
counter-rt !s r'#!t to see9 'n)ort'on %out t!e "tter@s d'sese )ro t!e !os-'t"
%"ood re-ort o) t!e "tter 's ('"%"e.
In t!e cse o) Mr. C v. Bospital E 75; -erson
-r'(cy s-ec')'c""y con)erred %y Art'c"e 21 o) t!e Const'tut'on o) Ind' nd
'-"'c't -o
-
8/16/2019 Artcle12 vs Right to Privcy
25/29
25
'n cse o) t!'s nture cnnot !e"d to %e one@s r'#!t to -r'(cy. Cert'n "
Art'c"e 21 o) t!e Const'tut'on. In "" s'tut'ons; -erson cn %e s9ed to under#o ,I7 test
su%&ected to suc! test %y )orce
or 'n t!e cse under Sect'on 2/ nd 20 o) t!e I*C; -erson y %e co-e""ed to #'(e %"ood
s-ec'en )or ,I7 test. T!e 'un'ty under Art'c"e 2 does not e:tend to co-u"s'on o)
#'('n# %"ood s-ec'ens.
In t!e Un'ted Sttes o) Aer'c; "
-
8/16/2019 Artcle12 vs Right to Privcy
26/29
2
CHAPTER-
CONCLUSION
Our Const'tut'on does not s-ec')'c""y #urntee r'#!t to -r'(cy %ut t!rou#! t!e &ud'c'" 'nter-rett'on; 't !s #ot t!e sttus o) )undent" r'#!t under Art'c"e 21; %ut
st'"" t!e content nd e:tent o) t!'s r'#!t 's not c"er. T!e -rotect'on o) -r'(cy under t!e
r'#!t to !un d'#n'ty ens!r'ned 'n Art'c"e 21 's not su))'c'ent to 'nc"ude "" t!e
s-ects o) -r'(cy. A"on#
-
8/16/2019 Artcle12 vs Right to Privcy
27/29
20
T!ou#! t!e -r'(cy !s ne(er %een c"'ed s tter o) "e#" r'#!t e't!er #'nst
stte or 'nd'('du"s; %ut
un't; re no
T!ou#! Art'c"e 21 !s rece'(ed 'ts Court; 't oore 6" )udley
4rivacy/ he 4ress and the 6a
*""d'n L< *u%"'s!'n# Ltd; 2$.
-
8/16/2019 Artcle12 vs Right to Privcy
28/29
2
3" 'hu:la /"9"
-onstitution of #ndia
Estern Boo9 Co.; 1t! ed.; 21.
4" Bhat ," !sh&ar
unda!ental :ights/ A study of thier #nterrelatiionship
Estern L< ,ouse; Ne< De"!'; 2+.
5" ,andey 6"9"
-onstitutional 6a of #ndia
Centr" L< A#ency; +2nd ed.; 2.
" 6ain >","
#ndian -onstitutional la
Wd!"
-onstitutional 6a of #ndia
Un'(ers" L< *u%"'s!ers; Ne< De"!'; 7o". I; +t! ed.
" Basu ))
-o!!entary on the -onstitution of #ndia
Le:'s Ne:'s; Butters;
he Danish !buds!an
-
8/16/2019 Artcle12 vs Right to Privcy
29/29
2
=R'#!t to *r'(cy4 An An"ys's o) De(e"o-ent" *rocess 'n Ind'; Aer'c And
Euro-e>
-entral 6a #ndia Huaterly,