Artcle12 vs Right to Privcy

download Artcle12 vs Right to Privcy

of 29

Transcript of Artcle12 vs Right to Privcy

  • 8/16/2019 Artcle12 vs Right to Privcy

    1/29

    1

    Analysis of Article 21 vis a vis Right to

    privacy

    TABLE OF CONTENTS

     TOPIC

    ACKNOWLEDMENT

  • 8/16/2019 Artcle12 vs Right to Privcy

    2/29

    2

    TABLE OF CONTENTS

    LIST OF CASES

    CHAPTER-1

    INTRODUCTION

    1.1 Introductory

    1.2 Reserc! Met!odo"o#y

    1.$ O%&ect'(e o) t!e *ro&ect

    1.+ ,y-ot!es's

    1. Mode o) c'tt'on

    1./ L'terture Sur(ey

    1.0 Sco-e nd L''tt'on

    1. C!-ter'3t'on *"nn'n#

    CHAPTER-2

    ARTICLE 21 OF T,E INDIAN CONSTITUTION4 C,ARTER OF

    UNARTICULATED RI5,TS

    2.1 R'#!t to L')e nd *erson" L'%erty

    2.2 R'#!t to -r'(cy4 Unrt'cu"ted r'#!t under Art'c"e 21

    CHAPTER-3

    CONCE*TUAL ANAL6SIS OF RI5,T TO *RI7AC6

    $.1 De)'n't'on o) *r'(cy

    $.2 C!rcter'st'cs o) *r'(cy

    $.$ 5rounds o) t!e r'#!t to -r'(cy

    CHAPTER-4

  • 8/16/2019 Artcle12 vs Right to Privcy

    3/29

    3

    TRACIN5 T,E ORI5IN OF RI5,T TO *RI7AC6 IN INDIA T,ROU5,

    CASE ANAL6SIS

    +.1 R'#!t to -r'(cy 'n t!e "'#!t 8ud'c'" ct'('s

    +.1.1 T!e Mne9 T!es's

    +.1.2 De(e"o-ent o) r'#!t to -r'(cy )ter Mne9 Cse

    +.2 T--'n# o) Te"e-!one nd t!e r'#!t to -r'(cy

    +.$ Mr't" nd se:u" -r'(cy

    CHAPTER-5

    Conc"us'on

    B'%"'o#r-!y

    CHAPTER-1

    INTRODUCTION

  • 8/16/2019 Artcle12 vs Right to Privcy

    4/29

    4

    T!e Const'tut'on o) Ind' -ro('des t!e "'st o) #urnteed )undent" r'#!ts under *rt III;

    nd t!e M#n Crt on# t!ese r'#!ts 's Art'c"e 21;

     -erson" "'%erty. Art'c"e 21; ') red "'ter""y; 's co"our"ess rt'c"e nd

    'nd'('du" to est%"'s! 'nd'('du" %oundr'es

    St'"" "ot ore !s to %e done )or t!e reco#n't'on nd -rotect'on o) -r'(cy %y "< 'n Ind'.

    As tter o) )ct; t!'s conce-t 's ?u'et 'n -r''t'(e st#e o) 'ts de(e"o-ent. ,o

    R'#!t 'n(o"(es t!e e:tent to

    cred't

  • 8/16/2019 Artcle12 vs Right to Privcy

    5/29

    5

    "'en to Ind'n Cu"ture1.  In t!e ce"e%rted cse o)  ADM Jabalpur V. Shivkant Shukla2 , t!e

    Su-ree Court sou#!t to deter'ne ') t!e r'#!t to -erson" "'%erty 's "''ted %y; ny

    "''tt'ons ot!er t!n t!ose e:-ress"y cont'ned 'n t!e Const'tut'on nd t!e sttute "

  • 8/16/2019 Artcle12 vs Right to Privcy

    6/29

    ARTICLE 21 OF T,E INDIAN CONSTITUTION4

    C,ARTER OF UNARTICULATED RI5,TS

    2.1 Right to Life an Pe!"ona# Li$e!t%&

     Right to life and personal Liberty:  No -erson s!"" %e de-r'(ed o) !'s "')e or -erson"

    "'%erty e:ce-t ccord'n# to -rocedure est%"'s!ed %y "

    "ed'n# cse under t!e ndte o) Art'c"e 21.

     *ost 5o-"n cse t!e scenr'o 'n res-ect o) sco-e o) Art'c"e 21 !s %een e:-nded or 

    od')'ed #rdu""y t!rou#! d'))erent dec's'ons o) t!e A-e: Court nd 't

    e:'ned

    A!R 15 ' 20" A!R 10 ' 50"1 A!R 11 ' 04"

  • 8/16/2019 Artcle12 vs Right to Privcy

    7/29

  • 8/16/2019 Artcle12 vs Right to Privcy

    8/29

    As resu"t o) e:-ns'on o) t!e sco-e o) Art'c"e 21; t!e *u%"'c Interest L't'#t'ons 'n res-ect

    r'#!t to -r'(cy; o) c!'"dren 'n &'" %e'n# ent't"ed to s-ec'" -rotect'on; !e"t! !3rds due to

     -o""ut'on nd !r)u" dru#s; !ous'n# )or %e##rs; 'ed'te ed'c" 'd to 'n&ured -ersons;

    str(t'on det!s; t!e r'#!t to 9no

    reson%"e; )'r nd suc! "

    o) t!e Const'tut'on.1

    2.2 Right to '!i(a)%& an *na!ti)*#ate !ight *ne! the +anate of 

    A!ti)#e 21&

    In t!'s %c9#round o) t!e e:-nded sco-e o) Art'c"e 21 coes t!e d'ens'on o) r'#!t to

     -r'(cy.

    As W'""' Dou#"s o%ser(es; =t!e r'#!t to %e "et "one 's 'ndeed t!e %e#'nn'n# o) ""

    )reedos.>1/ A"t!ou#! 't 's concerned

  • 8/16/2019 Artcle12 vs Right to Privcy

    9/29

    3.1 ,efinition of '!i(a)%&

    T!e

    nd 'nd'('du"s; %ut s!re %s'c coon t!ees.

    *r'(cy 'n #ener" ens t!e r'#!t to %e "et "one. 8ust'ce Coo"ey )'rst co'ned 't 'n 1.

    Su" Wrren nd Loues Brnde's )o""o

    stte.22  Den *rosser 2$  !s o-'ned t!t -r'(cy 's not n 'nde-endent ("ue t "" %ut

    co-os'te 'nterest 'n re-utt'on; eot'on" trn?u'""'ty nd 'ntn#'%"e -ro-erty. Accord'n# to

    !'; )o""o

  • 8/16/2019 Artcle12 vs Right to Privcy

    10/29

    1

    tort o) 'n(s'on o) -r'(cy %ut on"y ne< ax&ell$ London $ 1$

    pp(323(333"20 0l*stead v. US, 200 U' 43 E127"2 Rayond ?ac:s$ 9he "rote!tion of "riva!+4, '&eet and >ax&ell$ London$ 1$ p(13"

    http://www.cili.in/http://www.cili.in/

  • 8/16/2019 Artcle12 vs Right to Privcy

    11/29

    11

    1. 4rivacy as consisting in being let alone.

     T!ere re ny (ers'ons o) t!'s ccount; t!t o) Wrren nd Brnde's; "t!ou#! "'n9ed

    en'n#)u" outs'de o) soc'et'es.

    ). "riva!+ as the la!k of dis!losure, and the ri/ht to 3riva!+ as the ri/ht 

    to sele!tive dis!losureT!e de)'n't'on o) -r'(cy de)ended 'n !ere 's t!t -r'(cy 's contro" o(er

    t!e (r'ous -rts o) us cn %e sensed %y ot!ers.$

    In ters o) t!'s #ener" ('e< t!t t!e r'#!t to -r'(cy 's t!e r'#!t o) t!e 'nd'('du" to

    deter'ne

    re o%('ous -ro%"es !ere; -ro%"es re"t'n# to r9'n# o)) t!e se") nd 'ts re" e:tens'ons

    )ro t!e nonse"); nd to s!o

    '-"'es t!t se")d'sc"osure cn 'n(o"(e ne't!er 'n(s'ons nor "oss o) -r'(cy; nd )urt!er; t!t

    !%'tut'on to 'n(s'ons nd "oss o) -r'(cy t!t "eds to c?u'escence nd e(en consent to

    suc! 'n(s'ons; cuses t!e to %ecoe ne't!er 'n(s'ons nor "osses o) -r'(cy. 6et -rt o) t!t

    2 Fp" cit 2"3 R" B" ,ar:er$ *A )e

  • 8/16/2019 Artcle12 vs Right to Privcy

    12/29

    12

    %out

    un'(ers't'es; e-"oyers; %n9s; cred'tors; nd ny ot!ers;

    nd t!ey see9 to )oster 'n t!ose

    to suc! 'n(s'ons o) t!e'r -r'(cy. C"er"y; t!ere re cons'der%"e d'))'cu"t'es t!en 'n t!e

    :. "riva!+ as the a;sen!e of 3u;li!it+2

    T!'s 9'nd o) t!'n9'n# %out -r'(cy 'n ters o) se"ect'(e d'sc"osure !s "so "ed to t!e

    su##est'on t!t -r'(cy cons'sts 'n t!e %sence o) -u%"'c'ty %out oneHs -erson; oneHs ))'rs;

    nd t!e "'9e. Cert'n"y; t!ose concerned not t!ey -u%"'c'3e

    t!e coun'c%"e 9no

    r'#!t to -r'(cy ent't"es one to e:c"ude ot!ers )ro

  • 8/16/2019 Artcle12 vs Right to Privcy

    13/29

    13

    c""ed -r'(cy r'#!ts re re""y c"uster o) der'(t'(e r'#!ts; r'#!ts 'n ny cses der'(t'(e

    )ro or n"o#ous

    *r'(cy nd secrecy re o%('ous"y d'st'nct; so t!t to res-ect secrecy 's not necessr'"y to

    res-ect -r'(cy; to )orce t!e d'(u"#'n# o)

    do

    ("ues o) res-ect; "o(e nd )r'ends!'- 'n -rt'cu"r. ,e see9s to %se t!e r'#!t to -r'(cy on

    t!e r'#!t to res-ect; nd on t!e ("ue nd -oss'%'"'ty o) "o(e nd )r'ends!'-; t!ese %e'n# %sed

    on t!e or"'ty o) res-ect )or -ersons; t!e r'#!t to -r'(cy %e'n# seen s n s-ect o) t!e r'#!t

    to res-ect s -erson. T!us; !e

    33 6" 6" +hoson$ *+he Right to ,rivacy.$ "hiloso3h+ and "u;li! @airs 4$ 9o" 4 E'uer!057$ pp(25(314"

    34 " Gried$ *,rivacy.$ Aale Law Journal$ 00$ 9o" 3 E6anuary 10(7$ pp(405(43"35 " Gried$. An Anatoy of /alues8 ,robles of ,ersonal and 'ocial hoice *$Ca*;rid/e2 Harvard$ !0"

  • 8/16/2019 Artcle12 vs Right to Privcy

    14/29

    14

     -r'(cy re &ust')'%"e;

    'n(s'on o) -r'(cy; t!t co-enst'on %y

    se:u" conduct; et'n#; dr'n9'n#; ncestry; nd #r'e) nd so on; y or y not %e tters o) 

     -r'(cy. In our soc'ety; uc! t!t )orty yers #o

     -r'nc'-"e o) res-ect )or -r'(cy 's t!t o) H'n('o"te -erson"'tyH. T!e -r'(te 's seen to re"te

    not to e(eryt!'n# nd nyt!'n# %out t!e 'nd'('du" %ut to !' s -erson nd s un'?ue

     -erson. Suc! n ccount o) -r'(cy 'n ters o) ccess to;

  • 8/16/2019 Artcle12 vs Right to Privcy

    15/29

    15

    9'ns!'-; "o(e; )r'ends!'-; !ed o) -r'(cy. T!ey y; s 'n "o(e; rr'#e; t!e )'"y; see9 to

    crete "r#er se");

    CHAPTER-4

    TRACIN5 T,E ORI5IN OF RI5,T TO *RI7AC6 IN

    INDIA T,ROU5, CASE ANAL6SIS

    30 @"6" >c los:ey$ *,rivacy and the right to ,rivacy.$ Ca*;rid/e Universit+ "ress, /ol"55$ 9o" 211$ 6an 1$ pp10(3"

  • 8/16/2019 Artcle12 vs Right to Privcy

    16/29

    1

    T!e Ind'n const'tut'on does not #urntee t!e r'#!t to -r'(cy s )undent" r'#!t. In our 

    country; t!e so"e cred't #oes to &ud'c'ry )or reco#n'3'n# t!e conce-t o) -r'(cy %ecuse

    ne't!er t!e Const'tut'on nor ny ot!er sttute 'n our country de)'ned t!'s conce-t. St'"" "ot

    ore !s to %e done )or t!e reco#n't'on nd -rotect'on o) -r'(cy %y "< 'n Ind'. As tter 

    o) )ct t!'s conce-t 's ?u'et 'n -r''t'(e st#e o) 'ts de(e"o-ent. But 'ts de(e"o-ent 's %ound !(e treendous e))ect on t!e 'nd'('du"@s "'('n#.$  T!e stru##"e to s-ec')'c""y

    'ncor-orte -r'(cy s s-ec')'c )undent" r'#!t under t!e Const'tut'on 's su%stnt'""y

    ttr'%ut%"e; 'n t!e "r#e esure; to t!e or-!ous c!rcter o) t!'s r'#!t $.

    4.1 Right to '!i(a)% *ne! /*i)ia# a)ti(i"+&

    A""!%d ,'#! Court 'n 8ihal -hand v. 3haan Dei,59  too9 )'rst ste-

    'nde-endent e:'stence o) t!e r'#!t to -r'(cy s eer#'n# )ro t!e custo nd trd't'ons o) 

    t!e -eo-"e %es'des %e'n# sttutory r'#!t. It o%ser(ed4

    &he right to privacy based on social custo!...is different fro! right to privacy based 

    on natural !odesty and hu!an !orality, the later is not confined to any class, creed,

    colour or race and it is a birth right of any hu!an being and is sacred and should be

    observed. he right should not be e0ercised in an oppressive ay.$

    T!en 'n;  M.4. Shar!a v. Satish -handra ,51 

     -ro('s'ons

    11d; 11e nd 21. T!e &or'ty o) t!e &ud#es -rt'c'-t'n# 'n t!e dec's'on s'd o) t!er'#!t to -r'(cy t!t =Our Const'tut'on does not 'n ters con)er ny "'9e const'tut'on"

    #urntee.>+$ On t!e ot!er !nd; t!e 'nor'ty o-'n'on Su%% Ro; 8. ishra$ *Right to ,rivacy8 An Analysis of )evelopental,rocess in !ndia$ Aerica and #urope.$ Central India Law 5uarterl+, ta:en fro &&&"cili"inon th 6anuary 21"3 9ait Fberoi$ *+he Right to ,rivacy8 +racing the 6udicial Approach Gollo&ing thehara: 'ingh ase.$ ta:en fro &&&"indla&"co on 16anuary 21"4 A!R 135 All" 2"

    41 14 'R 100"42 A!R 13 ' 125"43 !bid"$ at 13"

    http://www.cili.in/http://www.indlaw.com/http://www.cili.in/http://www.indlaw.com/

  • 8/16/2019 Artcle12 vs Right to Privcy

    17/29

    10

    'n)err'n# t!e r'#!t to -r'(cy )ro t!e e:-ress'on =-erson" "'%erty> 'n Art'c"e 21. In t!e

    t!e re#u"t'on 'n ?uest'on +

    44 !bid"$ at 13"45 A!R 105 ' 130"4 !bid$ at 135"40 !bid"$ at 13"4 Air 15 ' 24"4 !n an Aerican case$ Jane Roe v. Henr+ 6ade, 41 U' 113$ the U' 'upree ourt has

    observed regarding the right to privacy8*Although the onstitution of the U'A does not explicitly ention any right of privacy$ the U' 'upree ourt recognies that a right of personal privacy$ or a

  • 8/16/2019 Artcle12 vs Right to Privcy

    18/29

    1

    T!e r'#!t to -r'(cy !(e se(er" s-ects. One suc! s-ect 's t!e r'#!t to -rocrete. T!'s 's

    "so 9no. T!e r'#!t to use condos; t!e r'#!t o)

    guarantee of certain areas or ones of privacy$ does exist under the onstitution$and the roots of that ay be found in the Girst Aendent$ in the fourth and the

  • 8/16/2019 Artcle12 vs Right to Privcy

    19/29

    1

    T!e r'#!t to -r'(cy !s no< %ecoe est%"'s!ed 'n Ind'; %ut s -rt o) Art'c"e 21 nd not

    s n 'nde-endent r'#!t 'n 'tse"); s suc! r'#!t; %y 'tse"); !s not %een 'dent')'ed under t!e

    Const'tut'on. T!e Court !s !oT!'s ens

    4.1.1 The 0anea The"i"&T!e &ur's-rudent'" ed')'ce o) t!e d'st'nct'on %et

    e:erc'se o) t!e ned )undent" r'#!t 's not necessr'"y co-re!ended 'n t!t )undent"

    r'#!t. S'nce; t!e r'#!t to -r'(cy 's not ned r'#!t; 'n order to %ecoe -rt o) t!e ned

    r'#!t to  personal liberty? ; t!'s !s to %e s!o -ro-os't'ons re4

    54 6"9 ,andey$ Constitutional Law of India, entral La& Agency$ Allahabad$ 42nd ed"$ 25$p(220"55 E107 1' 24"5 A!R 10 ' 50$ 4"50 A!R 12 ' 101"

    5 9ait Fberoi$ *+he right to ,rivacy8 tracing the 6udicial Approach follo&ing the hara:'ingh.$ &&&"indla&"co on 1th 6anuary 21"5 A!R 15 ' 24"

    http://www.indlaw.com/http://www.indlaw.com/

  • 8/16/2019 Artcle12 vs Right to Privcy

    20/29

    2

    =1 t!e r'#!t to -r'(cy 's '-"'c't 'n t!e r'#!t to "')e nd "'%erty #urnteed to t!e

    c't'3ens o) t!'s country %y Art'c"e 21. It 's =r'#!t to %e "e)t "one>. A c't'3en !s

    r'#!t to s)e#urd t!e -r'(cy o) !'s o

    "'%"e 'n n ct'on )or d#es. *os't'on y !o

    T!'s so e(en

    e%er o) t!e -ress nd ed' to -ro(e t!t !e cted )ter reson%"e (er')'ct'on

    o) )cts; 't 's not necessry )or !' to -ro(e t!t

    n'os'ty; t!e de)endnt

    re-resents e:ce-t'on to t!'s ru"e.

    + So )r s t!e #o(ernent; "oc" ut!or'ty nd ot!er or#ns nd 'nst'tut'ons

    e:erc's'n# #o(ernent" -o

  • 8/16/2019 Artcle12 vs Right to Privcy

    21/29

    21

    Ru"e $ nd + do not; !o

  • 8/16/2019 Artcle12 vs Right to Privcy

    22/29

    22

    const'tut'on""y -er'ss'%"e 'n Ind' I) so;

    !'#! !nded 'nter)erence %y t--'n# o) t!e con(erst'on %y -o"'ce. But t!e -rotect'on 's not

    )or t!e #u'"ty #'nst t!e e))ort o) t!e -o"'ce to ('nd'cte t!e " T!e r'#!t to !o"d te"e-!one con(erst'on 's t!e -r'(cy o) one@s !oe or o))'ce

    . Con(erst'ons on

    te"e-!one re o)ten o) n 'nt'te nd con)'dent'" nture. Te"e-!one con(erst'on 's -rt o) 

    odern@s n "')e. T--'n# o) te"e-!ones 's ser'ous 'n(s'on o) -r'(cy. =R'#!t to -r'(cy

    T!'sens t!t te"e-!one t--'n#

    s''"r ters. T!e court !s ccord'n#"y 'nter-reted Art'c"e21 'n con)or'ty

  • 8/16/2019 Artcle12 vs Right to Privcy

    23/29

    23

    4.3 0a!ita# an Se*a# P!i(a)%&Mr't" nd se:u" -r'(cy ente )ro t!e -enu%rs o) s-ec')'c const'tut'on" #urntees.

    In (risold v. -onnecticut =7 Mr. 8ust'ce Dou#"s conceded const'tut'on" %s's )or r'#!t to

     -r'(cy 'n )reedo o) ssoc't'on. ,e s'd; =Mrr'#e 's co'n# )or %etter or )or t!e reedy o) rest'tut'on o) con&u#" r'#!ts -osed t!e ?uest'on o) r't" -r'(cy e:tent. T!e

    And!r *rdes! ,'#! Court 'n . Sareetha v. . Venkatasubbaiah=)  ?us!ed 't s str9est

    )or o) #o(ernent 'n(s'on o) -erson" 'dent'ty nd 'nd'('du" 3one o) 'nt'te dec's'ons

     -rotected under Art'c"e 21@. *.A. C!ud!ury )or t!e Court ('e

    e:erc'se o) -o

  • 8/16/2019 Artcle12 vs Right to Privcy

    24/29

    24

    conse?uent'" d'scr''nt'on 'n e(ery

     -ros-ect'(e s-ouse su))er'n# )ro AIDS nd !s '#nored t!e )ct t!t t!e ot!er -ros-ect'(e

    counter-rt !s r'#!t to see9 'n)ort'on %out t!e "tter@s d'sese )ro t!e !os-'t"

     %"ood re-ort o) t!e "tter 's ('"%"e.

    In t!e cse o) Mr. C v. Bospital E 75; -erson

     -r'(cy s-ec')'c""y con)erred %y Art'c"e 21 o) t!e Const'tut'on o) Ind' nd

    '-"'c't -o

  • 8/16/2019 Artcle12 vs Right to Privcy

    25/29

    25

    'n cse o) t!'s nture cnnot !e"d to %e one@s r'#!t to -r'(cy. Cert'n "

    Art'c"e 21 o) t!e Const'tut'on. In "" s'tut'ons; -erson cn %e s9ed to under#o ,I7 test

    su%&ected to suc! test %y )orce

    or 'n t!e cse under Sect'on 2/ nd 20 o) t!e I*C; -erson y %e co-e""ed to #'(e %"ood

    s-ec'en )or ,I7 test. T!e 'un'ty under Art'c"e 2 does not e:tend to co-u"s'on o) 

    #'('n# %"ood s-ec'ens.

    In t!e Un'ted Sttes o) Aer'c; "

  • 8/16/2019 Artcle12 vs Right to Privcy

    26/29

    2

    CHAPTER-

    CONCLUSION

    Our Const'tut'on does not s-ec')'c""y #urntee r'#!t to -r'(cy %ut t!rou#! t!e &ud'c'" 'nter-rett'on; 't !s #ot t!e sttus o) )undent" r'#!t under Art'c"e 21; %ut

    st'"" t!e content nd e:tent o) t!'s r'#!t 's not c"er. T!e -rotect'on o) -r'(cy under t!e

    r'#!t to !un d'#n'ty ens!r'ned 'n Art'c"e 21 's not su))'c'ent to 'nc"ude "" t!e

    s-ects o) -r'(cy. A"on#

  • 8/16/2019 Artcle12 vs Right to Privcy

    27/29

    20

    T!ou#! t!e -r'(cy !s ne(er %een c"'ed s tter o) "e#" r'#!t e't!er #'nst

    stte or 'nd'('du"s; %ut

    un't; re no

    T!ou#! Art'c"e 21 !s rece'(ed 'ts Court; 't oore 6" )udley

     4rivacy/ he 4ress and the 6a

    *""d'n L< *u%"'s!'n# Ltd; 2$.

  • 8/16/2019 Artcle12 vs Right to Privcy

    28/29

    2

    3" 'hu:la /"9"

    -onstitution of #ndia

    Estern Boo9 Co.; 1t! ed.; 21.

    4" Bhat ," !sh&ar

     unda!ental :ights/ A study of thier #nterrelatiionship

    Estern L< ,ouse; Ne< De"!'; 2+.

    5" ,andey 6"9"

    -onstitutional 6a of #ndia

    Centr" L< A#ency; +2nd ed.; 2.

    " 6ain >","

     #ndian -onstitutional la

    Wd!"

    -onstitutional 6a of #ndia

    Un'(ers" L< *u%"'s!ers; Ne< De"!'; 7o". I; +t! ed.

    " Basu ))

    -o!!entary on the -onstitution of #ndia

    Le:'s Ne:'s; Butters;

    he Danish !buds!an

  • 8/16/2019 Artcle12 vs Right to Privcy

    29/29

    2

    =R'#!t to *r'(cy4 An An"ys's o) De(e"o-ent" *rocess 'n Ind'; Aer'c And

    Euro-e>

    -entral 6a #ndia Huaterly,