Arrhythmias

M. LaCombeMDFMR/UNECOMJuly 22, 2009

Let’s start with an easy one:

Sinus rhythm with 2:1 AV heart block. The ECG shows a bradyarrhythmia with non-conducted sinus P waves alternating with normally conducted P waves. It is not possible to reliably identify the point of block (nodal vs. infranodal) from

this single ECG with 2:1 conduction. There is no evidence of acute inferior ischemia, either. The site of block could be proximal (in the AV node) or more distal, in the His-Purkinje system. In general, with 2:1 block, involvement of the AV node is favored by a narrow QRS complex and a prolonged PR interval, or by the presence of

intermittent AV Wenckebach. Block (infranodal) in the His-Purkinje system would be favored by a

concomitant bundle branch block and/or with a PR interval of 160 ms or less. A possibly useful

bedside diagnostic test for chronic 2:1 block (in the absence of active ischemia) would be to increase the sinus rate (mild exercise). A

resumption of 1:1 conduction favors AV node block while worsening of block strongly favors

infranodal disease. Pacemaker placement is indicated for symptomatic 2:1 block without reversible cause (e.g., drug effect) and

generally for asymptomatic 2:1 block due to infranodal disease. Intracardiac His bundle

electrogram would definitively identify the site of block. This patient had intermittent 3:2 AV Wenckebach at other times, and then resumed 1:1

conduction on subsequent ECGs, consistent with AV node disease

Put this one together for me:

Sinus rhythm with AV Wenckebach with 4:3 conduction in the setting of an acute inferior

wall infarction. The ECG demonstrates Q waves and ST elevation in leads 2, 3, and aVF. There are also reciprocal ST segment depressions in leads

1, aVL and V2-3. The rhythm is Wenckebach showing progressive prolongation of the PR intervals, shortening of the R-R intervals and block of every fourth P wave. The presence of "group"

beating is easily recognized and characteristic of Wenckebach and is often associated with high

vagal tone or nodal ischemia in the setting of an inferior wall myocardial infraction (MI). The

block is at the level of the AV node

You’ve seen this one before, but now,let’s focus on the rhythm

Atrial fibrillation with a rapid ventricular response. Right axis deviation. Intraventricular conduction delay. Right ventricular hypertrophy (RVH). This patient has severe mitral stenosis with pulmonary congestion, pulmonary hypertension, and right heart failure. A qR in lead V1 is one of the most specific signs for right ventricular hypertrophy. Other causes of a qR in V1 include a right bundle branch block (RBBB) in patients with an anterior myocardial

infarction or normal patients who have a QS in V1 and subsequently develop a RBBB. This patient has right axis deviation in addition to the qR in V1 which

suggests RVH. Given atrial fibrillation and RVH one should strongly consider mitral stenosis. Additional note on differentiating right ventricular hypertrophy (RVH) from lateral MI: In some cases of severe (RVH) with marked right axis deviation, leads I and aVL may show rS or even QS waves, simulating lateral MI. In this case, lead V1 notably shows a narrow qR complex (not just a tall R wave) strongly suggestive of RVH, rather than posterior-lateral MI. Also, the lateral precordial leads here show rS type complexes, not QR waves. Physical examination, echocardiogram and other imaging modalities also provide important information about RVH vs. lateral MI in cases where the ECG is

ambiguous.

The tracing shows sinus rhythm with complete heart block and an A-V junctional type escape

rhythm. The P-P interval surrounding an individual QRS complex is narrower (shorter) than the P-P interval between two QRS complexes. Sinus

rate variation with complete heart block is called ventriculophasic sinus arrhythmia. The

patient has congenital complete heart block. This entity is usually idiopathic but may be secondary

to placental transfer of anti-Ro and La antibodies from the mother. The spectrum of

disease ranges from patients who are born with severe bradycardia and require pacemakers in infancy to patients who live full life spans

without artificial pacemakers. The overall infant mortality is 15%. The escape rhythm in this

instance is proximal in the conduction system and a pacemaker is not required at this time.

Ventricular paced rhythm with underlying complete heart block (P waves march through). Most

important is superimposed current of injury with hyperacute ST-T changes inferiorly and laterally

with reciprocal change V1-V3 consistent with acute infero-postero-lateral ischemia/ myocardial infarction (MI). Pacemaker patterns, like left bundle branch block (LBBB), often mask acute or chronic MI. But sometimes, as in the present case, the ischemic changes "show through."

Acute infero-lateral and probably posterior myocardial infarction (MI) with inferior Q waves

and hyperacute ST-T complexes inferiorly and laterally with reciprocal ST depressions V1-V3. Tall initial R waves in V1-V3 with right bundle branch block. There is second degree AV block

(Type 1) with 2:1 block initially and then 3:2 AV Wenckebach with underlying sinus rate of about

85/min. Left axis deviation is present. However, since this is an inferior MI, a pacemaker is not usually indicated: block here is in the AV node

usually due to ischemia and increased vagal tone. In contrast, new right bundle with left axis with acute anterior-septal MI would be indication for prophylactic pacemaker. AV block in that setting

is due to Type II mechanism associated with severe involvement of His-Purkinje system and carries ominous prognosis with high risk of

complete heart block with slow (or no) escape rhythm.

We used to see this more often,back in the day…

Be careful here. This may look superficially like sinus but if you look in V1, you can see P waves just before the QRS (there is right bundle branch

block (RBBB) and also P waves in the T wave (halfway in between) which are partly hidden. Atrial rate is about 150, ventricular rate 75.

This is atrial tachycardia with 2:1 block (paroxysmal atrial tachycardia) "PAT with block" if it occurs paroxysmally) which may be due to

digoxin toxicity, atrial disease, etc. If you got this right, PAT yourself on back; if you choked on it, a more forceful interscapular blow may be

indicated.

The major finding is narrow complex tachycardia with atrial rate of about 300 indicating atrial

flutter and slightly variable ventricular response (2:1 conduction, some 3:1 and probably some Wenckebach). Atrial flutter is sometimes mistaken (by housestaff at other institutions)

for sinus tachycardia. Look, for instance, at V1 where the flutter waves are hard to see vs. lead II where they are more apparent. If only a V1

type lead were available, the mechanism could be readily mistaken.

Sinus tachycardia with 2:1 block (hidden P waves in T waves, e.g. leads V2 and V3) and left bundle branch block (LBBB). This most likely is type 2

block given its occurrence with sinus tachycardia and presence of LBBB. Patient was referred for evaluation for pacemaker. Remember the "meet me halfway" rule: always look halfway in between

obvious P waves for hidden ones.

This one is tricky. Be careful.

Note there is evidence here of mitral valvular disease: ECG is highly suggestive of

biventricular hypertrophy with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) type pattern in precordial leads and QRS axis of about +90 degrees. This combination is common with Rheumatic Heart

Disease with MS/MR +/- aortic disease. Rhythm is junctional with retrograde P waves with

relatively long RP interval in lead II, V1, etc. with single ventricular premature beat.

But don’t stop there: of note is long Q-T with prominent U waves raising question of drug

effect/toxicity or hypokalemia. Patient was on a phenothiazine here. The ST-T changes are consistent with hypertrophy, drug effect,

ischemia, etc. Patient was also on digoxin with low therapeutic level.

Atrial flutter.

Don't miss hidden atrial (F) wave just after QRS. This is atrial flutter with 2:1 conduction. Note that with atrial flutter there aren't P waves per se but atrial waves. So if you talk about atrial flutter do not say "the P waves...." since once

you say P wave, the informed listener will probably assume it's not atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter. On the other hand, depending on

whom you are talking to, this may not be an issue. Also note left ventricular hypertrophy

(LVH) and left axis with possible prior inferior wall myocardial infarction (MI) here. Note that typical flutter waves have negative polarity in

lead II, as is the case here.

This is highly suggestive of Parkinson's disease.

The ECG shows the classic pseudo atrial flutter/fib type waves associated with

Parkinsonian tremor. The marked amplitude of the waves, absence of an irregular ventricular rate and subtle hidden true P waves in selected leads

(lead 2, intermittently, aVR) indicate the diagnosis. Refer to neurology not cardiology.

This is sinus rhythmn.

This is a case of pseudo-flutter waves due to artifact (probably Parkinsonian tremor). Some

leads show clear sinus P wave, e.g. V2, V3. So, remember, look at all the leads.

AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). This tracing demonstrates a REGULAR narrow complex tachycardia at a rate of 150. The differential diagnosis of this supraventricular tachycardia includes: sinus tachycardia, AVNRT, automatic

atrial tachycardia, atrio-ventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVRT), involving retrograde

conduction over a "concealed" bypass tract, or atrial flutter with 2:1 block. If P waves can be

located it can be helpful in determining the mechanism of the tachycardia. In this tracing P waves can be located at the end of the QRS in lead II and aVF, producing a "pseudo S" wave.

Absence of P waves or a "pseudo S" pattern in II, III, or aVF, or a "pseudo R prime" pattern in V1

is characteristic of AVNRT due to near simultaneous activation of the atrium and the

ventricle from the AV node. If the diagnosis is still in doubt, adenosine may be useful in

slowing conduction in the AV node. Reentrant rhythms (AVNRT or AVRT) may "break" abruptly,

converting to sinus; the ventricular response of other atrial tachcyardia or atrial flutter will slow often revealing underlying atrial activity. (Note: the final wide complex waveform is either an artifact or a ventricular premature beat.)

A Pause, for understanding...

Here is another AVNRT, with those pseudo-S waves:

But AVNRT gets confused with the less common AVRT:

AVRT is the consequence of the WPW-type congenital bypass tracks

The short PR and Delta Wave of WPW

A “classical” 12-lead EKG of WPW

So, what’s this?

Pre-admission testing showed pre-excitation, with subtle (very, very subtle if you missed it) Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) pattern. Note shortish PR and

delta wave, best seen in V5 as slurring of initial QRS, with tall R (positive delta wave) in V1, negative in aVL, compatable with lateral bypass tract. What is differential diagnosis of tall R in V1? You should

consider 1) normal variant, esp children, but also some adults, or lead placement; 2) funny chest/mediastinal configuration with heart more rightward; 3) posterior

myocardial infarction (MI) (inferior/lateral ischemia/MI usually also seen); 4) right ventricular

hypertrophy (usually right axis); 5) WPW with posterior or lateral bypass tract; 6) right ventricular

conduction abnormality; 7) hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) with or without obstruction; 8) Duchenne muscular

dystrophy (due to postero-basal fibrosis).

Atrial fibrillation with the Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome, with conduction down the bypass tract. This is for the most part a wide complex tachycardia with a rate of about 230

beats/min. The differential diagnosis includes 1) ventricular tachycardia, 2) supraventricular tachycardia with aberrancy, and 3) WPW with

conduction down the bypass tract. The major clues include the "irregularly irregular" rhythm and

the extremely rapid rate. Ventricular tachycardia may be mildy irregular but this degree of

irregularity would be unusual at this very fast rate. The short refractory period of certain bypass tracts can allow extremely rapid heart

rates, especially during atrial fibrillation. A correct diagnosis is very important because drugs

that slow AV conduction (verapamil, beta blockers, digoxin, adenosine) are

contraindicated. These drugs can facilitate preferential conduction down the bypass tract and

the atrial fibrillation can degenerate to ventricular fibrillation.

A drug of choice is IV procainamide and if this is unsuccessful, DC cardioversion should be

performed promptly.

Ectopic atrial (non-sinus) tachycardia with 2:1 block and 3:2 AV Wenckebach (beats 4 and 5). Note the negative P waves in lead II indicating a non-sinus pacemaker. Other important abnormalities:

right bundle branch block, left anterior fascicular block and a markedly prolonged QT(U)

interval. This patient was on digoxin and quinidine. The evidence for quinidine toxicity (assuming the serum potassium is normal and no

other factors prolonging ventricular repolarization are identifiable) is the very long QT(U) interval best seen in V2-V5. This finding predisposes to torsade de pointes and may occur with "therapeutic" or "subtherapeutic" levels of quinidine or other class 1A antiarrhythmic drugs.

Atrial tachycardia with Mobitz I block also strongly raises the question of digitalis

toxicity. With pure 2:1 AV block, it may be impossible from the surface ECG to tell if the

non-conducted beats are due to nodal or infranodal block. The clue here centers on beats

4 and 5 where 3:2 Wenckebach is evident, indicating block in the AV node.

It's only NSR if that stands for Not Sinus Rhythm. Note that there are two P's for every QRS (see V1) and that atrial activity at 176/min is negative in lead 2. This is atrial (not sinus)

tachycardia with 2:1 block (conduction). Block is almost certainly at AV node level (Type 1

mechanism). Always exclude digitalis excess with this arrhythmia (not present here). ECG also shows low limb lead voltage, left ventricular

hypertrophy (LVH) by precordial voltage and slow R wave progression

There is a wide-complex tachycardia with right bundle branch and left axis deviation (RBBB/LAD) pattern (old per hx). The rhythm is NOT sinus but atrial flutter with subtle flutter waves (aVR, II, V1). Note the negative polarity of atrial waves in lead II,

characteristic of typical atrial flutter. Atrial flutter with 2:1 conduction is among most commonly

missed major rhythms (often called sinus tachycardia by housestaff-- at other institutions, of course). Sustained atrial flutter is likely the major

contributor, if not the precipitant of congestive heart failure syndrome here in this elderly man. Note that patients with atrial flutter may be candidates for ablation treatment to interrupt reentrant wave that

underlies this rhythm.

Sinus rhythm with AV Wenckebach (Type 1 AV block) is present with 3:2 and 2:1 conduction. Notice progressive PR prolongation in 3:2 cycles with

non-conducted sinus P wave followed by normal PR interval. Etiologies include drugs (beta-

blockers, digitalis, calcium channel blockers), inferior ischemia, intrinsic AV node disease,

Lyme disease, etc. In healthy young adults with high vagal tone (e.g. athletes) AV Wenckebach during sleeping hours is not uncommon. This patient's ECG also shows left ventricular

hypertrophy (LVH), left atrial abnormality (LAA) (biphasic P wave with broad negative component in V1) and infero-lateral T wave inversions raising

question of ischemia.

Atrial flutter with 2:1 conduction. Don't overlook subtle "extra" atrial wave (it's NOT a true P wave, but a flutter wave) in the early ST segment. Atrial flutter with 2:1 conduction (block) is often mistaken

for sinus tachycardia or paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT)

There is a wide-complex tachycardia. The QRS shows a classic left bundle branch

block (LBBB) pattern. If you look carefully, you will see atrial activity in the limb leads, with negative polarity in lead II, at rate of 320/min. Hence, atrial flutter with 2:1 conduction and

LBBB.

It may look like sinus tachycardia, but look again in V1: There are two atrial waves for each QRS, so the atrial rate is 260. This is another case of atrial flutter with 2:1 conduction, one of the most

commonly mistaken arrhythmias! This case is particularly tough because

of low voltage in limb leads.

ECG shows sinus rhythm at 75/min but with 2:1 AV block. There is also left atrial

abnormality (LAA). Conducted QRS complexes show right bundle branch block (RBBB) with left axis deviation, most c/w left anterior fascicular block. Minuscule

R waves in II, III, aVF also raise question of prior inferior myocardial infarction (MI). The normal PR interval in conducted beats and the RBBB favor an infranodal location of block. Aficionados may also note the ventriculophasic sinus arrhythmia (P-P interval with QRS in-between is shorter than P-P without intervening QRS due to vagal tone

fluctuations). Treatment: pacemaker.

Narrow complex tachyardia at 180/min with probable subtle retrograde P waves just after the QRS (may need to print this out to see in lead aVR and II). Therefore, likely diagnosis is AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT); although, concealed

bypass tract tachycardia or atrial tachycardia not excluded. This is, of

course, NOT sinus and is also NOT atrial flutter (no flutter waves and ventricular rate is too fast for flutter with 2:1

conduction).

The underlying rhythm is atrial fibrillation (AF) with a slow regularized ventricular response (45/min) consistent with complete heart block (CHB) with a junctional escape mechanism. The QRS complexes show an intraventricular

conduction delay (IVCD) with left axis and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH)

and there is Q-T(U) prolongation. Etiologic differential diagnosis includes intrinsic conduction disease, rule out drug toxicity or metabolic factors. The long QT here is against digitalis as sole

factor (digitalis shortens the QT). Hypokalemia or relevant drug effects,

such as sotalol or amiodarone, should be excluded. Treatment: If no reversible causes, patient will likely require an implanted ventricular pacemaker, as well

as anticoagulation for AF.

Atrial tachycardia with 2:1 block and ventricular premature complexes (VPBs). Check out lead V1 if you missed this. The

atrial rate is 200. (Points against atrial flutter are the atrial rate and discrete-appearing P waves, upright in lead 2). Also present: left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) with intraventricular conduction defect (IVCD) (incomplete left bundle branch block-LBBB) and poor R wave

progression (cannot rule out prior anterior myocardial infarction (MI); but this could be due to LVH/IVCD alone); also non-specific ST-T changes. The patient was not digitalis toxic.

Major Segue!

Homework Assignment for the interns:

Ten signs or symptoms with names derived from mythology.

Back to work:

This does indeed look like atrial flutter or coarse atrial fibrillation with

regularized response. However, if you look closely, (V4; also lead 2 rhythm strip at end) you can see true P waves

buried in baseline artifact. So, probable tremor artifact.

Atrial flutter with 2:1 block. Note that there are 2 atrial waves for each QRS in lead V1. The atrial rate is about 240; therefore, this could easily be misread

as sinus tachycardia or paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT)

variant--not by you of course. ECG also shows left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH)

and possible prior antero-septal myocardial infarction (MI), along with

non-specific ST-T changes.

Atrial fibrillation with an extremely rapid ventricular response (overall average about 204 beats per minute).

There is intermittent right bundle branch block (RBBB) aberrancy (note QRS morphology in V1/V6, especially),

associated with the very fast rates. In all, there are 10 consecutive beats with

RBBB aberrancy, during which the ventricular response rate is up to 240

beats per minute

This looks like sinus bradycardia at a rate of 43 bpm, BUT... if you look more closely, there are P waves partly hidden in T waves. So this is actually pure sinus with blocked atrial premature

complexes (APBs) in a bigeminal pattern. As a result the effective sinus rate is very slow. There are also non-specific T

wave inversions noted in V1-V3.

The rhythm is sinus with long, atypical AV Wenckebach cycles (e.g., probable 6:5 block). The reason for the type 1 second degree AV block is apparent from the rest

of the tracing which shows classic findings of an acute inferior/right ventricular myocardial infarction,

consistent with proximal to mid-occlusion of the right coronary artery (RCA). The finding of ST elevation in lead III>II, as present here, is also consistent with

this finding.

The rhythm is sinus with ventricular bigeminy and late diastolic premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) that come just after the second sinus P waves. The PVCs have a right bundle branch block (RBBB) morphology, but this is not

intermittent RBBB or Wolf-Parkinson-White Syndrome (WPW).

The rhythm is sinus (or possibly atrial) tachycardia with a P wave rate of about 120/min with AV Wenckebach. There is an evolving inferior (posterior) myocardial infarction (MI) pattern with Q waves and T wave inversions in 2, 3, aVF, and a

tall R in V2. The AV conduction disturbance is likely related to the MI.

There is also low voltage and non-specific lateral ST-T changes.

Normal sinus rhythm with artifact in V4-V6, simulating premature ventricular

complexes (PVCs). Note that simultaneous lead II (bottom) does not show this, and normal rhythm is not affected by the

spurious "beats."

Classic Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) pre-excitation pattern, with triad of short PR, wide QRS and Delta waves. Note the

polarity of the delta waves (most positive in lead 2 and lateral chest leads) consistent with a right-sided

bypass tract. Patients with WPW may not only have atrio-ventricular reentrant tachycardia involving the bypass tract, but also AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, as well as atrial fibrillation (AF), etc.

One other segue -- here is WPW in reverse:

That is, White-Parkinson-Wolff

Sinus with 5:4 AV Wenckebach. Low voltage (consistent with obesity, Chronic

Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), and/or myocardial infarction (MI) with extensive cardiac muscle necrosis) makes identification of the very broad, low

amplitude P waves difficult! Note subtle changes in T-wave morphology due to

superimposed atrial activity. (Right axis deviation here could be due to COPD, lateral extension of infarct, or left

posterior fascicular block.)

Normal sinus rhythm with a marked prolonged PR ("1st degree AV block"). The P waves, partly obscured by the T waves of the preceding sinus beats, are more clearly evident after the premautre

ventricular complexes (PVCs), (beats 3 and 9, and the last beat). In addition, there is an intraventricular conduction

delay (IVCD), borderline left axis deviation, and lateral ST-T wave changes associated with a history of multiple

non-Q wave myocardial infarctions. The QT appears long in part because of the superimposed P wave deflection at the

terminal portion of the T wave.

Sinus rhythm with atrial bigeminy (this pattern starts after the 4th sinus beat). In addition, there are voltage criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), possible left atrial abnormality, and poor R-wave progression in V1-V3. The latter finding could be due to LVH,

underlying anterior myocardial infarction (MI), lead placement; or could be a physiologic variant. The seventh QRS

complex exhibits aberrancy, with a left anterior hemiblock morphology.

This is most likely atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVRT), one of the

"short R-P" tachycardias. Note the inverted P waves in leads II, III, and F; with upright P waves in aVR, consistent with retrograde activation of the atria from the region near the AV node and

septum. Therefore, the descending limb of this reentrant rhythm is down the AV node, and the ascending limb is up a

bypass tract located close to the septum. The differential diagnosis also includes AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) with a somewhat prolonged retrograde (fast pathway) limb, or, less likely,

atrial tachycardia coming from low in the atria, with a very prolonged PR interval.

At first glance this might appear to be "sinus tachycardia." However, a second look reveals two interesting findings. Note the unusual P wave axis (negative in I and aVL) and the short PR

interval (or very long RP interval). One possible explanation for these findings is that this is an

atrial tachycardia with either 1) a rapidly conducting ("slick") AV node, or 2) an "atrio-

His" bypass tract with fast conducting properties. This would account for the short PR

interval in the presence of an atrial tachycardia. Another possibility for this non-sinus tachycardia is that it represents a "long RP tachycardia" involving a left lateral bypass tract which is slowly conducting (to account for the long RP interval). In this latter case, the

reentrant circuit would involve antegrade (orthodromic conduction) down a rapidly

conducting AV node and through the ventricular myocardium, with retrograde conduction up the

slowly conducting bypass tract, and then across the atria back to the AV node.Note that resting

heart rates above 140 beats/min are rarely due to sinus tachycardia in the very elderly.

The rhythm is atrial fibrillation with a rapid ventricular response (irregular

rate at about 120 beats/min). There is an extremely wide QRS of left bundle branch block morphology; the QRS duration of over 200ms is suggestive of drug effect or hyperkalemia. Flecainide is a class Ic

(Na+ channel blocking) drug, which exhibits "use dependency": at faster

rates with less time for dissociation of the drug from the channel, Na+ channels are increasingly saturated with the drug.

This increases the degree of QRS prolongation, and may be mistaken for

ventricular tachycardia.

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) at rate of 170. The right bundle branch block

morphology is atypical (monomorphic R, rather than rSR', in V1), and the R:S

ratio is less than 1 in V6, both suggestive of ventricular tachycardia. Although the most common underlying diagnosis in adult North American

patients with sustained monomorphic VT is coronary heart disease status post

myocardial infarction (MI)s, this patient had a non-ischemic cardiomyopathy. The morphology of the VT is suggestive of origin from the left side of the heart, near the base (right bundle branch block with inferior/rightward axis). As with any wide complex tachycardia that is hemodynamically tolerated, the most

important data to obtain is the 12-lead ECG, as this can direct possible

radiofrequency ablation at the time of electrophysiology study.

(This is quite difficult, but worth it.)

Atrial flutter (negative atrial waves in II, positive in V1) with an atrial rate of

approximately 230 BPM with subtle group beating. On close inspection, there are groups of two

ventricular beats followed by pauses, with more atrial waves than there should be for simple 3:2 AV Wenckebach conduction pattern. This pattern is attributable to dual levels of block (multilevel

block) in the AV node: in this case 2:1 AV conduction "above" 3:2 AV Wenckebach conduction. If you said atrial flutter (or raised question of flutter vs.rapid atrial tachycardia) along with Wenckebach variant, give yourself four out of

five stars.

This is most consistent with accelerated idioventricular rhythmn (AIVR),

originating from the left ventricle and therefore accounting for the atypical RBBB morphology. ST elevations in the precordial leads are likely due to the injury current from and underlying acute myocardial infarction (MI). AIVR may be marker of reperfusion following acute MI. The rate of about (83 per minute) is too slow for ventricular tachycardia and too

fast for complete heart block.

This is relatively slow bi-directional ventricular tachycardia (VT). Note the sinus P waves (sinus tachycardia) at a

rate of about 110 beats/min (most visible in the lead II rhythm strip toward end of recording) with apparent atrioventricular

(AV) dissociation and a wide complex tachycardia at about 100 beats/min. The

QRS complex alternates between two morphologies. This arrhythmia should always raise suspicion of digitalis toxicity (not present in this patient with a recent myocardial infarct).

The name, bi-directional VT, is confusing, as are many terms generated by

cardiologists, who in the main, are poorly literate in my estimation. It

refers to alternating right-and left- BBB conduction of the ectopic ventricular focus. “Ventricular remodeling” is another term that drives me crazy; it

evokes images of rearranging the furniture in the LV chamber.

Atrial fibrillation with a very rapid ventricular response (average

160-170/min).Other Findings: Low limb voltage, minor RV conduction delay with rsr' (or possibly Qr) in V1 complex, and non-specific ST-T changes (on digoxin).

Coarse atrial fibrillation (not flutter) is present with a slow ventricular response. There is an atypical left

bundle branch block (LBBB) pattern. The rsR' in lateral leads (e.g., V6 here) is

highly suggestive of severe left ventricular (LV )dysfunction, often

associated with a ventricular aneurysm (El-Sherif sign). A QR or rsR' complex is

also present in I and aVL. Left axis deviation and a long QT are noted, as well. The patient had heart failure due

to prior silent infarction.

Atrial tachycardia (NOT sinus tachycardia) with variable block. Also left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and left axis deviation are present. This

is not complete heart block either. Note that the rate is not slow and regular. Instead, the

changing PR is due to variable AV block. This patient has a history of rheumatic heart disease (mitral and aortic regurgitation) and underwent a cardiac electrophysiology procedure with ablation of the ectopic atrial site that was the source of the tachycardia. Always exclude digoxin excess

(not present here) in cases of atrial tachycardia with block as well. (Note: the subtle variation in QRS morphology, e.g., in leads II,IIII and

aVF, which is due to varying degrees of superposition of the P waves on the QRS complexes

and also, possibly, to slight changes in QRS conduction at different rates. This nonspecific

finding should be distinguished from 2:1 electrical alternans patterns.)

Now let’s cover some ventricular issues:

Causes of wide-QRS tachycardia

Brugada algorithm

Differential criteria considering the QRS morphology in leads V1 and V6 in case of right bundle branch block (RBBB) or left

bundle branch block (LBBB) aspect.

Our first unknown.

Rapid SVT or V. Tach? Makes a difference, right?

We’ll start with the Brugada

algorithm

Are there any RS complexes in the V leads?

Absence of any RS complex in the precordial

leads V1..V6 is 100% specific for VT, but is insensitive (26%).

Here’s the tracing once again.

So, is there an RS in any of the precordial leads?

Yes, V2 has an RSR’.

So let’s go to the next step of the

Brugada Algorithm...

Brugada algorithm

In any of these RS complexes, is the interval from start of R to nadir of

S > 100ms ?

Look at V2, and specifically at the fifth complex there...

The R wave starts on a solid line, and the nadir of the S wave is only two small boxes or .08 secs (80 msecs) out.

So we need to go to the next step in the

algorithm...

Is there AV dissociation, or are there fusion or capture

beats?

{A capture beat QRS looks normal because a conducted sinus beat transiently captures the ventricles; fusion beat's QRS is intermediate between normal and the VT complex}

Well, what do you think?

I think I can see P waves. Can you?

So, if we are correct, then according to the algorithm this is V. Tach, because there are P waves not

associated with any QRS’s. But let’s suppose we aren’t

sure.

Let’s go to the next step of the B.A., that is

examining morphology. (This is tedious, but

productive.)

Is the QRS complex in V1 predominantly positive?

No it isn’t. So this doesn’t help us.

Let’s move on...

The RS interval is over 60 ms., so...

Next look at V6. Is there a monophasic R , or a QR , or an R:S ratio < 1 , or

a QS?

If any of these morphologic criteria exist,it’s likely to be V tach. What’s your call?

This is a rapid monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT), 280 beats per minute, associated with hemodynamic collapse. This tracing was obtained from a patient

with severe ischemic cardiomyopathy during an electrophysiologic (EP) study.

The rhythm later converted to sinus with a single external shock. This patient had an

atrial rate of 72 beats per minute (measured with intracardiac electrodes,

not shown). Although ventriculoatrial dissociation (faster V rate than A rate) is diagnostic of VT, the surface ECG findings are only present approximately 20% of the time. In this tracing, the ventricular rate is simply too fast for P waves to be observed. VT with cycle lengths from 200-240 ms is

often termed ventricular flutter.

So by morphology, and because we thinkWe see A-V dissociation as well, we can say:

But here’s an important point:

if there is hemodynamic collapse, shoot first and ask questions later:

Often the best 'drug' is in fact electricity, as sustained VT often

deteriorates into VF if left unmanaged.

Okay, next case:

Is this supraventricular, ornonsustained V. Tach?

If we use the algorithm...

You will readily see that two sensitive

criteria for V. Tach are met:

There is A-V dissociation, and in V1, the interval from the start of the R

wave to the nadir of the S wave is > 100

msec.

Can you see the P waves, without correspondingQRS’s? (A-V dissociation)

And in V1, the first complex starts on a solidLine and the nadir of the S wave is at least 2.5boxes later (i.e. .10 sec. or 100 msec)

So this is repetitive monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) from an

asymptomatic 45-year-old female wind surfer. This patient has a structurally

normal heart. This ECG pattern is typical for a form of idiopathic VT arising from the

right ventricular outflow tract. Unlike ischemic VTs, this form of VT is often

provoked by exercise and suppressed by beta blockade or verapamil. The prognosis

for these patients is good, with the following 2 exceptions: (1) occasionally, this form of VT is associated with right

ventricular dysplasia, which is associated with sudden death, and (2) occasionally,

patients with incessant VT develop congestive heart failure due to

tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy. The cardiomyopathy generally resolves when

the tachycardia is treated.

What’s this one?

You might be tempted to jump to “atrial

fibrillation with an aberrated ventricular conduction” but let’s

use the algorithm first.

Brugada algorithm

There are RS’s in the precordial leads, so that criteria is not met, those are very

broad S waves (not to be confused with

inverted broad ST/T segments) so the RS

interval is certainly greater than 100 msec.

Agree?

Also, look at V4-6. Remind you ofanything?

This ECG shows a relatively regular, wide complex polymorphic ventricular

tachycardia, rate 150 bpm, that is most likely a type of torsade(s) de pointes. See leads V4-V6 for classic “turning of the points” morphology. Intermittent

ventricular fusion beats may be present. Causes of this life-threatening

arrhythmia include a variety of drugs and specific electrolyte abnormalities

(especially hypokalemia and hypomagnesemia) associated with long QT (U) intervals, as well as hereditary long

QT syndromes due to “channelopathies.”Admission laboratory

testing revealed a serum potassium of 2.2 (normal range 3.5-5.3 mEq/L), sodium of 143 (range 135-148 mEq/L), bicarbonate of 16 (normal 21-30mEq/L), phosphate 1.0 (range 2.7-4.5 mg/dL) and magnesium 2.5

(range 1.6-2.6 mg/dL.)

Polymorphic V. Tach

This one should be easy for you now...

Because there are RS waves in the

precordial leads, that criteria is not met,

but the RS interval is huge.

Let’s use that other table of criteria on this one, just for

fun...

Differential criteria considering the QRS morphology in leads V1 and V6 in case of right bundle branch block (RBBB) or left

bundle branch block (LBBB) aspect.

Do you agree that this looks RBBB-like?

Differential criteria considering the QRS morphology in leads V1 and V6 in case of right bundle branch block (RBBB) or left

bundle branch block (LBBB) aspect.

So, the tracing has a RBBB like appearance, and V1 has a qRSR’.

So this one is monomorphic V. Tach

The ECG shows a relatively regular, very wide-complex tachycardia with a heart rate of 130/min and a QRS duration of

about 180 ms. The QRS morphology is that of a right bundle branch block (RBBB)

with a qRSR′in V1, rS in V6 and a marked rightward axis. Underlying atrial activity is hard to discern with certainty but may be sinus with AV dissociation. These factors indicate ventricular tachycardia which was

confirmed at cardiac electrophysiology study. A left ventricular tachycardia intramyocardial focus (associated with this ECG pattern) localized below the

anterior papillary muscle was successfully eliminated with radiofrequency ablation.

A wide-complex tachycardia.V. Tach?

Let’s start with this again...

There are RS’s in the precordial leads, so

that’s out.

The RS interval is not greater than 100 msec.

so that’s out too.

Is there A-V dissociation?

Actually, there is A-V association;Look at lead III

So now we have to go through all those laborious morphologic

criteria:Is the QRS complex in V1

predominantly positive?

Yes it is.

So:

V1 is a QR

So, next look at V6...

Ans.: none of the above, so this is SVT,

but...

A close look at V5 gives us another way to attack this...

So this is not V. Tach. This is

Atrial flutter with 2:1 conduction and RBBB

This ECG shows subtle atrial flutter with 2:1 block, right bundle branch block and right axis deviation. The atrial rate is about 260 bpm (see upright flutter

waves in lead V1) with a ventricular response rate of about 130 bpm. The right axis deviation here, in the

absence of clinical evidence of right ventricular hypertrophy or lateral infarction, likely represents

left posterior fascicular block.The patient had persistent atrial flutter with variable block or atrial

fibrillation at other times.

Here’s a three-fer. Careful.

This ECG shows underlying coarse atrial fibrillation (AF) with (right)

ventricular demand pacing at a rate about 78 bpm with a relatively wide QRS complex (left bundle branch block morphology) at about 180 milliseconds. Two PVCs are seen (2nd and 6th beat).There are no sinus P waves or flutter waves and no atrial

spikes to indicate dual chamber pacing.

You don’t need algorithms for this one.

What is this?

Back to the algorithm...

My problem is knowing where the baseline is

in the precordial leads, and therefore defining R, S, and Q

waves.

So we’ll need to do the morphology thing

again.

Or use that other chart...

Differential criteria considering the QRS morphology in leads V1 and V6 in case of right bundle branch block (RBBB) or left

bundle branch block (LBBB) aspect.

The rSR’ in V1 suggests a RBBB

...and the QS in V6 gives it away...

This is monomorphic ventricular tachycardia at a rate of about 140 bpm

with a very wide (QRS duration about 0.20 second) with a right bundle branch block and superior axis deviation morphology. The previous ECG done on this patient the

same day showed an extensive anterolateral ST elevation acute myocardial infarction . There is

suggestion of ST elevation here in V5 and V6 which is difficult to interpret with

the wide QRS here.

An easy one...

This ECG shows sinus rhythm with ventricular bigeminy (every other beat is a ventricular premature beat or complex (VPB or VPC, for short) of the same morphology in each lead.Note also the minimal diffuse ST elevations (with non-specific T wave inversions). These

repolarization changes are consistent with sub-clinical

perioperative pericarditis, a ECG common finding after coronary

artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.

Try this:

The problem here is that it’s impossible for me to fit this into a BBB category (and use the table), and I can’t really define the baseline

well enough to use the Brugada algorithm.

So let’s see if we can dissect this out...

This ECG shows a very wide-complex (between 160-200 msec) tachycardia at a rate about 180 bpm

with a bundle branch (BBB) morphology.

The diagnosis of monomorphic ventricular tachycardia is strongly supported by the

following criteria:

1) Wide QRS (greater than 140 ms) in the absence of drugs or hyperkalemia (the QRS here is

extremely wide);

2) wide monophasic R wave in lead V1 (or RS or QR complex in that lead (or whatever we choose to

call it).

3) QR complexes in the inferior leads with extreme axis deviation; 4) rS or QS waves in V6.

It’s the rS in V6 that makes me worryabout V. tach.

A resting rate of 180 bpm excludes sinus tachycardia, especially in this age group. There

is no evidence of atrial flutter or atrial tachycardia, and, as described, the QRS

morphology here is strongly against aberrant supraventricular conduction.

This patient had a complicated cardiac history of coronary artery disease, status post bypass graft

surgery and prior inferior infarction. He had recurrent ventricular tachycardia, likely originating the area of the prior inferior

infarct. An echocardiogram revealed showed a dilated left atrium and left ventricle, extensive thinning with an akinetic scar of the inferior

base and moderately severe mitral regurgitation. Estimated left ventricular ejection fraction was

35%.

This is a great tracing. I hope you’re saving these.

Let’s see if our algorithm works

for this one:

There are RS complexes in the precordium, but the RS interval is quite long, much greater than 100 msec, so that criteria is fulfilled

for V. Tach

Now let’s use the table. Is this more RBBB or LBBB?

LBBB type. Here’s the table:

The R in V1 isnot greater than 30 ms, and V6 has an RS, soneither criteria isfulfilled here forV tach.

So we have conflicting algorithms. Is there anything else that helps us here? Think outside the box:

The first 4 beats of this ECG show termination of a run of wide-complex tachycardia at rate about 150 bpm. The 5th and the 6th beats supraventricular conduction with

underlying atrial fibrillation now apparent. The conducted supraventricular beats suggest underlying inferior myocardial infarction with prominent Q waves in leads II and aVF and a borderline intraventricular conduction delay (QRS=110 msec). Starting with the 7th

beat and continuing to the end, the wide-complex ventricular tachycardia resumes. The wide-complex

tachycardia (QRS about 160 msec) has left bundle branch block morphology, with an inferior QRS axis.This ECG shows two features strongly favoring ventricular

tachycardia over supraventricular tachycardia with left bundle aberrancy, namely: 1) a broad R wave (40 msec or

more in duration) in leads V2, and 2) a delayed intrinsicoid deflection great than 70 msec in V1-V2

measured from the initial onset of the QRS to the nadir of the S wave. (The absence of these findings does not exclude ventricular tachycardia, however.)This patient ruled in for a small acute myocardial infarction with an elevated troponin, but normal creatine kinase. Echocardiogram showed a major infero-lateral wall motion abnormality consistent with prior myocardial infarction as well. He had recurrent episodes of ventricular tachycardia and underwent successful ablation of an ectopic focus in the crest of the

interventricular septum, under the left coronary cusp, consistent with the monomorphic ventricular tachycardia seen here with a left bundle branch block, inferior QRS

axis morphology.

New case: what do you think?

For the sake of brevity, I will tell you that neither the Brugada algorithm nor the table work for this one. That is to say, both will tell us that this is SVT.

Well then, what kind of SVT? It’s not flutter. There are no flutter waves. Nor are there any atrial fibrillatory waves. It’s not WPW; there are no delta waves. There

are no reentrant atrial waves seen, although after some of the

ventricular complexes, one can see P waves.

Sometimes the algorithms mislead us. That is why you need to think for yourself. This is hard stuff,

but no one can fault you for saying:

“I’m still worried about V. Tach.”

This ECG shows sinus rhythm (normal QTc) with runs of non-sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (starting 2nd beat, rate 170 bpm). The ventricular beats have a left bundle branch block pattern and inferior/borderline rightward QRS axis raising consideration of repetitive

monomorphic ventricular tachycardia arising from the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT).

Isolated premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) and two ventricular couplets are also present with the same morphology.Atrial tachycardia is

excluded as there are no premature P waves prior to the runs. The P waves associated with the wide complex beats appear to be retrograde consistent with ventricular-atrial conduction. No atrial

flutter waves are seen. There is no delta wave to suggest Wolff-Parkinson-White pattern.The patient had an idiopathic cardiomyopathy with global mild

ventricular hypokinesis. Previous attempts at ablation in the RVOT region had been attempted. At the time of repeat cardiac electrophysiologic study, the arrhythmia was not inducible, despite intensive programmed electrical and pharmacologic

stimulation. The diagnosis was monomorphic ventricular tachycardia of unknown mechanism,

possibly arising from the superior portion of the interventricular septum.

Trouble?

This is a classic ECG obtained during a ventricular fibrillation (VF) cardiac arrest. The findings are typical of ventricular fibrillation with more

organized ventricular electrical activity in the second half of the strip

consistent with ventricular flutter.There is no evidence of any atrial activity ruling out atrial fibrillation with

Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW ) or atrial flutter with a bundle branch block. The characteristic, systematic variation in QRS axis of torsade is not seen here (although torsade may degenerate

terminally into ventricular fibrillation.)

This is one for the table:

The tracing has a classic RBBB configuration

And is triphasic both in V1 and V6

There is a classic right bundle branch block (RBBB) morphology (rsR' in V1)

making VT unlikely. No definite atrial activity is seen (P waves or flutter

waves). The very regular rate at 150/min excludes AF. Therefore, the rhythm is

most consistent with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT), most likely AV nodal re-entrant tachycardia

(AVNRT), although AV re-entrant tachycardia or atrial tachycardia (with

hidden P waves) are not excluded.

An easy one...

There are fixed coupled premature ventricular compexes (PVCs) in a bigeminal pattern. Note the onset of each VPC comes just after a (non-conducted) sinus P wave,

giving the appearance of a short PR.The sinus beats show probable

left atrial abnormality, borderline left axis deviation, and a minor right ventricular (RV) conduction

delay.

Why the wide-complex rhythmn?

Both atrial and ventricular pacemaker spikes are seen, for example, in lead II, before

each P wave and QRS, respectively. The patient has a dual chamber rate responsive pacemaker (DDDR) pacemaker.

A difficult one...

Complex ECG showing:

1) Underlying atrial fibrillation; 2) Long Q-T(U);

3) Ventricular pacing with intermittent sensing failure; and 4) Run of torsade de pointes-type

of polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (second half of

record).

Very tough. Be careful.

Hint: I showed you this one to illustrate the A-V dissociation criteria of the Brugada algorithm

Do you see the A-V dissociation?

There is a wide complex tachycardia at about 165/min with an right bundle branch block (RBBB) morphology. Underlying sinus

tachycardia at about 136/min and AV dissociation are noted, confirming

the diagnosis of ventricular tachycardia (VT). (Note the clear sinus P waves, e.g., just after 5th QRS.) The QRS morphology and axis are consistent with origin of the VT from the posterior septum. The patient had had a prior large inferior-posterior myocardial infarction (MI). (Of additional note here is the relatively low limb lead voltage and sinus

tachycardia).

Thoughts?

What helps me here is V6. I get an idea of where the baseline is, and the RS

interval here clearly exceeds 100 msecs.

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) at rate of 170. The right bundle branch block

morphology is atypical (monomorphic R, rather than rSR', in V1), and the R:S

ratio is less than 1 in V6, both suggestive of ventricular tachycardia. Although the most common underlying diagnosis in adult North American

patients with sustained monomorphic VT is coronary heart disease status post

myocardial infarction (MI)s, this patient had a non-ischemic cardiomyopathy. The morphology of the VT is suggestive of origin from the left side of the heart, near the base (right bundle branch block with inferior/rightward axis). As with any wide complex tachycardia that is hemodynamically tolerated, the most

important data to obtain is the 12-lead ECG, as this can direct possible

radiofrequency ablation at the time of electrophysiology study.

Is this ventricular tachycardia?

No. The rhythm is atrial fibrillation with a rapid ventricular response

(irregular rate at about 120 beats/min). There is an extremely wide QRS of left bundle branch block morphology; the QRS duration of over 200ms is suggestive of drug effect or hyperkalemia. Flecainide is a class Ic (Na+ channel blocking)

drug, which exhibits "use dependency": at faster rates with less time for dissociation of the drug from the

channel, Na+ channels are increasingly saturated with the drug. This increases the degree of QRS prolongation, and may be mistaken for ventricular tachycardia.

The take-home message here, for this impossible case, is to ask what meds the

patient is on. Even if I were told “flecainide for A. Fib” I would not send

this patient home.

Is this polymorphic V-tach?

No. This is atrial fibrillation with an extremely rapid ventricular response (overall average about 204

beats per minute). There is intermittent right bundle branch block (RBBB) aberrancy (note QRS morphology in V1/V6, especially), associated with the very fast rates. In all, there are 10 consecutive beats with RBBB aberrancy, during which the

ventricular response rate is up to 240 beats per minute

(Both the algorithm and the table work well on this one.)

DC countershock immediately?

No. This is a ventricular paced rhythm with underlying complete

heart block (P waves march through). Most important is

superimposed current of injury with hyperacute ST-T changes inferiorly

and laterally with reciprocal change V1-V3 consistent with acute infero-postero-lateral ischemia/

myocardial infarction (MI). Pacemaker patterns, like left

bundle branch block (LBBB), often mask acute or chronic MI. But

sometimes, as in the present case, the ischemic changes "show

through."

Think this one through with me.Forget about algorithms.

Atrial fibrillation with the Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome, with conduction down the bypass tract. This is for the most part a wide complex tachycardia with a rate of about 230

beats/min. The differential diagnosis includes 1) ventricular tachycardia, 2) supraventricular tachycardia with aberrancy, and 3) WPW with

conduction down the bypass tract. The major clues include the "irregularly irregular" rhythm and

the extremely rapid rate. Ventricular tachycardia may be mildy irregular but this degree of

irregularity would be unusual at this very fast rate. The short refractory period of certain bypass tracts can allow extremely rapid heart

rates, especially during atrial fibrillation. A correct diagnosis is very important because drugs

that slow AV conduction (verapamil, beta blockers, digoxin, adenosine) are

contraindicated. These drugs can facilitate preferential conduction down the bypass tract and

the atrial fibrillation can degenerate to ventricular fibrillation. Call EP fellows stat! A drug of choice is IV procainamide and if this is

unsuccessful, DC cardioversion should be performed promptly.

Summary:

Many of these are very difficult.

The algorithms are hard to commit to

memory.For family medicine

practitioners who see this stuff

infrequently, this can be an impossible

situation, unless you remember

this axiom:

Always assume the patient has the worst treatable condition you can do something about,

and proceed from there.

In the case of wide-complex tachycardias, to say: “This is

probably just SVT with aberrated conduction” and send the patient home, is to court

disaster.

You do not have to know everything to be

a great doctor.

You just have to think.