Army National Guard Readiness Center Arlington, VA Arne Kvinnesland Construction Management AE...
-
Upload
hugh-fowler -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
2
Transcript of Army National Guard Readiness Center Arlington, VA Arne Kvinnesland Construction Management AE...
Army National Guard Readiness Center
Arlington, VA
Arne KvinneslandConstruction Management
AE Senior Thesis Final Presentation, Spring 2010
The Pennsylvania State University
Presentation Outline
• Project Introduction• Analyses Overview• Analysis I – Building Information Modeling• Analysis II – PV Panel System• Analysis III – Secant Pile Wall Alternative• Conclusion and Acknowledgments• Questions
Project IntroductionPresentation Outline
• Project Introduction• Analyses Overview• Analysis I – Building Information Modeling• Analysis II – PV Panel System• Analysis III – Secant Pile Wall Alternative• Conclusion and Acknowledgments• Questions
• Federal Office Building• Located: Arlington, VA• Size:
• 251,000 sf office building• 435 space parking garage
• Cost: $100,000,000• Design-Bid-Build• LEED Silver Rating
Presentation Outline
• Project Introduction• Analyses Overview• Analysis I – Building Information Modeling• Analysis II – PV Panel System• Analysis III – Secant Pile Wall Alternative• Conclusion and Acknowledgments• Questions
Analyses Overview
• Analysis I – Building Information Modeling• Further BIM progression in industry through deliverables• Owner and general contractor interviews
• Analysis II – Photovoltaic Panel System• Alternative Backup Power System• Energy Efficiency and Independence
• Analysis III – Secant Pile Wall Alternative• Structural Secant Pile Wall currently• Design of an alternative system that would be more cost
effective and easier to install
Presentation Outline
• Project Introduction• Analyses Overview• Analysis I – Building Information Modeling• Analysis II – PV Panel System• Analysis III – Secant Pile Wall Alternative• Conclusion and Acknowledgments• Questions
Analysis I - BIM
Goal:
Research current status of Building Information Modeling in the industry and come up with ways to further progress BIM through project deliverables.
Method:
Interview industry leaders and compare responses to research.
Presentation Outline
• Project Introduction• Analyses Overview• Analysis I – Building Information Modeling• Analysis II – PV Panel System• Analysis III – Secant Pile Wall Alternative• Conclusion and Acknowledgments• Questions
Analysis I - BIM
• Deliverables• Asset Management• Building Maintenance Scheduling• Building System Analysis• Cost Estimation• Disaster Planning• Existing Conditions Modeling• Phase Planning• Record Model• Space Management and Tracking
Presentation Outline
• Project Introduction• Analyses Overview• Analysis I – Building Information Modeling• Analysis II – PV Panel System• Analysis III – Secant Pile Wall Alternative• Conclusion and Acknowledgments• Questions
Analysis I - BIM
• Interview Results• Asking for use of BIM for MEP coordination, but not for
specific deliverables.• Asking for “BIM Implementation Plan” from contractor
for use during construction phase.• MEP as built drawings; warranty, service, and other O&M
data built into master file.
Presentation Outline
• Project Introduction• Analyses Overview• Analysis I – Building Information Modeling• Analysis II – PV Panel System• Analysis III – Secant Pile Wall Alternative• Conclusion and Acknowledgments• Questions
Analysis I - BIM
• Results Continued…• Government owners (USACE, NIH, GSA) asking for more
robust deliverables.• Master file with specific levels of detail, linking of files in
specific ways, specific inherent data within the model.• Majority of owners not asking for any deliverables, but
small group of very proactive owners asking for robust deliverables.
• Owner knowledge is expected to increase, deliverables more complex.
Presentation Outline
• Project Introduction• Analyses Overview• Analysis I – Building Information Modeling• Analysis II – PV Panel System• Analysis III – Secant Pile Wall Alternative• Conclusion and Acknowledgments• Questions
Analysis I - BIM
• Current Issues with BIM• Lack of knowledge of the capabilities• Cost vs. Funding Source
• Construction team vs. Facility Management team
• Lack of interoperability between owner’s systems and BIM software• Modeling platforms• Cost of training facility managers on new, complex
systems
Presentation Outline
• Project Introduction• Analyses Overview• Analysis I – Building Information Modeling• Analysis II – PV Panel System• Analysis III – Secant Pile Wall Alternative• Conclusion and Acknowledgments• Questions
Analysis I - BIM
• Solutions• Owner awareness
• Must come from contractor engineers or 3rd party consultants early on in project planning
• Owner experience
• Contractual Support• Solid deliverables and requirements built into contracts
• Software Compatibility• Uniformity and industry standards
Presentation Outline
• Project Introduction• Analyses Overview• Analysis I – Building Information Modeling• Analysis II – PV Panel System• Analysis III – Secant Pile Wall Alternative• Conclusion and Acknowledgments• Questions
Analysis II – PV Panel System
Goal:
Design a photovoltaic panel system to replace diesel powered backup generator.
Method:
PV Panel research, electrical and cost calculations, summarize owner options
Presentation Outline
• Project Introduction• Analyses Overview• Analysis I – Building Information Modeling• Analysis II – PV Panel System• Analysis III – Secant Pile Wall Alternative• Conclusion and Acknowledgments• Questions
Analysis II – PV Panel System
• Advantages• Additional points for LEED Silver rating• Energy independence• Source of clean, renewable energy• Reduction of conduit riser size, simplifying MEP
coordination• Reduced Cost
• Disadvantages• Reduction in amount of emergency power provided to
building
Presentation Outline
• Project Introduction• Analyses Overview• Analysis I – Building Information Modeling• Analysis II – PV Panel System• Analysis III – Secant Pile Wall Alternative• Conclusion and Acknowledgments• Questions
Analysis II – PV Panel System
• BP Solar SX 170B• Performance:
• Rated Power (Pmax) = 170 Watts
• Power Tolerance: +/- 9%• Volts: 35.4 • Amps: 4.8 • Size (inches): 63 x 31 x 2
BP Solar SX 170B
Presentation Outline
• Project Introduction• Analyses Overview• Analysis I – Building Information Modeling• Analysis II – PV Panel System• Analysis III – Secant Pile Wall Alternative• Conclusion and Acknowledgments• Questions
Analysis II – PV Panel System
• Spacing Calculations• Generator housing size: 22’ x 50’ = 1100 SF• Panel Size: ~ 15 SF• 73 possible panels• Use 60 panels, two 30 panel arrays
Presentation Outline
• Project Introduction• Analyses Overview• Analysis I – Building Information Modeling• Analysis II – PV Panel System• Analysis III – Secant Pile Wall Alternative• Conclusion and Acknowledgments• Questions
Analysis II – PV Panel System
• Cost Calculation• 1500 kW generator: $512,000• PV Panel: $850/panel• Panel cost: $51,000• Wiring cost: $2,217
• Cost Savings: ~ $460,000
Presentation Outline
• Project Introduction• Analyses Overview• Analysis I – Building Information Modeling• Analysis II – PV Panel System• Analysis III – Secant Pile Wall Alternative• Conclusion and Acknowledgments• Questions
Analysis II – PV Panel System
• Power Calculations• 170 Watts/panel x 60 panels = 10.2 kW• 5 hours exposure/day x 10.2kW = 51kW• 96 sunny days in Arlington, VA• Roughly 5000 kW per year
Presentation Outline
• Project Introduction• Analyses Overview• Analysis I – Building Information Modeling• Analysis II – PV Panel System• Analysis III – Secant Pile Wall Alternative• Conclusion and Acknowledgments• Questions
Analysis II – PV Panel System
• Conclusion• Clean, renewable energy source• Cost Savings• Continuous energy from panels• Emergency power loss with generator
removal• Owner’s choice
Presentation Outline
• Project Introduction• Analyses Overview• Analysis I – Building Information Modeling• Analysis II – PV Panel System• Analysis III – Secant Pile Wall Alternative• Conclusion and Acknowledgments• Questions
Analysis III – Secant Pile Wall
Goal:
Develop an alternative, more cost effective soil retention and permanent structural support system
Method:
Research alternative systems, perform structural calculations to prove equivalent performance, cost analysis
Presentation Outline
• Project Introduction• Analyses Overview• Analysis I – Building Information Modeling• Analysis II – PV Panel System• Analysis III – Secant Pile Wall Alternative• Conclusion and Acknowledgments• Questions
Analysis III – Secant Pile Wall
• Alternative System Research• Sheet Piling• Slurry Wall• Temporary sheeting and shoring• Concrete Retention Wall
Presentation Outline
• Project Introduction• Analyses Overview• Analysis I – Building Information Modeling• Analysis II – PV Panel System• Analysis III – Secant Pile Wall Alternative• Conclusion and Acknowledgments• Questions
Analysis III – Secant Pile Wall
• Concrete Retention Wall• Reinforced Cast In Place Concrete• Mass to resist structural loads• Embedment to resist overturning
Presentation Outline
• Project Introduction• Analyses Overview• Analysis I – Building Information Modeling• Analysis II – PV Panel System• Analysis III – Secant Pile Wall Alternative• Conclusion and Acknowledgments• Questions
Analysis III – Secant Pile Wall
• Structural Calculations• φVc = 68.3 kip• φVs = 36 kip
• MREQ = 356 ft-kip
• Embedment Calculations• Factor of Safety: 1.5• Embedment Depth = 15 feet
Presentation Outline
• Project Introduction• Analyses Overview• Analysis I – Building Information Modeling• Analysis II – PV Panel System• Analysis III – Secant Pile Wall Alternative• Conclusion and Acknowledgments• Questions
Analysis III – Secant Pile Wall
• Cost Calculations• Total Cost of Alternative System
• $450,000• Total Cost of Secant Pile Wall System
• $2,200,000• Total Upfront Cost Savings
• $1,750,000
Presentation Outline
• Project Introduction• Analyses Overview• Analysis I – Building Information Modeling• Analysis II – PV Panel System• Analysis III – Secant Pile Wall Alternative• Conclusion and Acknowledgments• Questions
Analysis III – Secant Pile Wall
• Conclusions• Equivalent Structural Performance• Large upfront cost savings• Simple system, reduction in schedule• Issue of constructability
Presentation Outline
• Project Introduction• Analyses Overview• Analysis I – Building Information Modeling• Analysis II – PV Panel System• Analysis III – Secant Pile Wall Alternative• Conclusion and Acknowledgments• Questions
Analyses Conclusions
• Analysis I – Building Information Modeling• BIM Infancy• Education is key
• Analysis II – PV Panel System• Clean, renewable, efficient energy source• Reduction in emergency power
• Analysis III – Secant Pile Wall Alternative• Structural Equivalency, Cost Savings• Constructability Issues
Presentation Outline
• Project Introduction• Analyses Overview• Analysis I – Building Information Modeling• Analysis II – PV Panel System• Analysis III – Secant Pile Wall Alternative• Conclusion and Acknowledgments• Questions
Acknowledgments
• Owner: • Army National Guard
• Architect/Engineer• AECOM
• General Contractor• Tompkins Builders, Inc
• AE Faculty and Fellow Students• Turner Construction
Presentation Outline
• Project Introduction• Analyses Overview• Analysis I – Building Information Modeling• Analysis II – PV Panel System• Analysis III – Secant Pile Wall Alternative• Conclusion and Acknowledgments• Questions
Questions