Arizona property tax overview
Transcript of Arizona property tax overview
Frazer Ryan Goldberg & Arnold, LLP
ARIZONA PROPERTY TAX OVERVIEW
Presented by Michael G. Galloway
Partner
Frazer Ryan Goldberg & Arnold, LLP
www.arizonatax.com
Q. What is the difference between Osama Bin Laden and a lawyer?
A. Bin Laden has some good qualities.
Top 10 Reasons Why Lawyers Should Replace Lab Rats
1. There is an endless supply.2. Lab assistants don’t get attached to them.3. It’s more fun to shave and stick needles in lawyers.
4. There are some things rats just won’t do.
5. It’s fun to dispose of them when you’re through.
6. It’s not “inhumane” treatment, when it comes to lawyers
7. No one cares when a lawyer squeals.
8. We’ve seen what happens when they are allowed to breed in the wild.
9. Lawyers belong in cages.
10. Animal rights activists don’t care if you torture lawyers.
Frazer Ryan Goldberg & Arnold, LLP
PropertySubject to Tax
Frazer Ryan Goldberg & Arnold, LLP
Generally, All Arizona Property is Subject to Taxation Unless an Exemption is Constitutionally Allowed or Required.
Frazer Ryan Goldberg & Arnold, LLP
Constitutional Exemptions Under Art. 9, §2
• Government Property• Public Charities• Public Debts• Household Goods• Business Personal Property• Inventory and Work in Progress• Widows and Veterans• Other Exemptions
Frazer Ryan Goldberg & Arnold, LLP
“Statutory” Exemptions
• Government Property. A.R.S. §42-11102.• Government bonded indebtedness. A.R.S.
§42-11103.• Education and library property. A.R.S. §42-
11104.• Health care property. A.R.S. §42-11105.• Apartments for the elderly or handicapped
residents. A.R.S. §42-11106.• Institutions for the relief of the indigent or
afflicted. A.R.S. §42-1107.
Frazer Ryan Goldberg & Arnold, LLP
• Grounds and buildings owned by agricultural societies. A.R.S. §42-11108.
• Religious property. A.R.S. §42-11108.
• Cemeteries. A.R.S. §42-11110.
• Observatories. A.R.S. §42-11112.
Frazer Ryan Goldberg & Arnold, LLP
• Land and buildings owned by societies to prevent cruelty to animals and for the shelter, care and control of animals. A.R.S. §42-11113
• Property held for conveyance as parkland. A.R.S. §42-1114
• Property held to preserve or protect scientific resources. A.R.S. §42-1115
• Property of arts & science organizations. A.R.S. §42-11116.
Frazer Ryan Goldberg & Arnold, LLP
• Property of volunteer fire departments. A.R.S. §42-11117.
• Social welfare and quasi-governmental service property. A.R.S. §42-11118.
• Property of volunteer roadway cleanup and beautification organizations. A.R.S. §42-11119.
• Property of veteran’s organizations. A.R.S. §42-11120.
Frazer Ryan Goldberg & Arnold, LLP
• Community service organizations. A.R.S. §42-11116.
• Volunteer fire departments. A.R.S. §42-11116.
• Social welfare and quasi-governmental service organizations. A.R.S. §42-11118.
• Volunteer roadway cleanup and beautification organizations. A.R.S. §42-11119.
• Veteran’s organizations. A.R.S. §42-11120.
• Community service organizations. A.R.S. §42-11121.
Frazer Ryan Goldberg & Arnold, LLP
• Trading commodities. A.R.S. §42-11122.
• Animal and poultry feed. A.R.S. §42-11123.
• Possessory interests for educational or charitable activities. A.R.S. §42-11124.
• Inventory, materials and products. A.R.S. §42-11125.
Frazer Ryan Goldberg & Arnold, LLP
• Production livestock and animals. A.R.S. §42-11126.
• Commercial and agricultural personal property up to $50,000 of each assessment account. A.R.S. §42-11127.
• Personal property in transit. A.R.S. §42-11128.
• Property of fraternal societies. A.R.S. §42-11129.
Frazer Ryan Goldberg & Arnold, LLP
Qualifying for Exemptions
• Affidavits
• Establish non-profit status
Frazer Ryan Goldberg & Arnold, LLP
Intangible Property is Not Taxed
Frazer Ryan Goldberg & Arnold, LLP
The Arizona Constitution allows property to be divided into classes for property tax purposes and each class may be treated differently. Ariz. Const. Art. IX, §1.
Frazer Ryan Goldberg & Arnold, LLP
• However, property within a class must be treated the same. Id.
– Physical characteristics
– legal characteristics
– use
– industry
Frazer Ryan Goldberg & Arnold, LLP
Class One– Producing mines and mining claims, related personal
property and improvements, mills and smelters and standing timber. It also includes real and personal property of gas and electric utility companies, of airport fuel and delivery companies, producing oil, gas and geothermal resource interests, water, sewer and wastewater utility companies, pipeline companies, shopping centers, golf courses, manufacturers, assemblers or fabricators, telephone or communications transmission companies and any other commercial or industrial use, other than property that is specifically included in another class.
– 25%
Frazer Ryan Goldberg & Arnold, LLP
Class Two– Real property and improvements and personal
property used for agricultural purposes, real property and improvements owned and controlled by a nonprofit that is exempt under 501(c)(3), (4), (7), (10) or (14) and all other real property, not included in Classes One, Three, Four, Six, Seven or Eight.
– Real property - 16%
– Personal property - 16% that exceeds the $50,000 plus exemption amount
Frazer Ryan Goldberg & Arnold, LLP
Class Three
– Real and personal residential - 10%
Frazer Ryan Goldberg & Arnold, LLP
Class Four
– Real and personal property used solely for the lease or rental of residential property
– 10%
Frazer Ryan Goldberg & Arnold, LLP
Class Five
– Property of railroad companies, private car companies and flight property
– The assessment ratio is determined annually by calculating specific ratios based on value of other property.
Frazer Ryan Goldberg & Arnold, LLP
Class Six– Noncommercial historic property, property located
within a foreign trade zone
– Property in a military reuse zone
– Real and personal property located in an enterprise zone
– Property comprising a qualified environmental technology plant
– Property used to remediate the environment mandated by governmental authority
– 5%
Frazer Ryan Goldberg & Arnold, LLP
Class Seven
– Real and personal property that is commercial historic property
– 25% except for modifications to restore the property which is assessed at 1% of value for up to ten years
Frazer Ryan Goldberg & Arnold, LLP
Class Eight
– Noncommercial historic property that is leased or rented as a residence
– The assessment ratio is 10%, except for modifications made to restore the property, which are assessed at 1% of value for up to 10 years
Frazer Ryan Goldberg & Arnold, LLP
Class Nine
– Possessory interests
– The assessment ratio for Class Nine property is 1%
Frazer Ryan Goldberg & Arnold, LLP
Classification Issues
• Current Use
• Intended Use
• Agricultural Land
• Residential Rentals
• Historic Property
• Subclasses
Frazer Ryan Goldberg & Arnold, LLP
Property Valuation
• Valuation Methods
– “Full cash value” is synonymous with “fair market value” unless an alternative statutory valuation method is prescribed. §42-11001.
– “[S]tandard appraisal methods and techniques” are to be used. §42-11054.
• Cost
• Income
• Market
Frazer Ryan Goldberg & Arnold, LLP
• Appraisal Techniques
– Cost approach
– Sales Comparison or Market Approach
– Income Approach
– Statutorily Prescribed Valuation Methods
• Electric and Gas Distribution Utilities
• Pipelines
• Shopping Centers
Frazer Ryan Goldberg & Arnold, LLP
• Current or Intended Use of Property
• Discrimination Prohibited
• The Valuation Role of County Assessors
• The Valuation Role of the Arizona Department of Revenue
• The Supervisory Role of the Arizona Department of Revenue
Frazer Ryan Goldberg & Arnold, LLP
Levy and Calculation of Tax
• Definitions
– Full Cash Value
– Limited Property Value
– Secondary Property Taxes
– Primary Property Taxes
– Current Usage
– Valuation Date
– Valuation Year
Frazer Ryan Goldberg & Arnold, LLP
• Calculation of the Limited Property Value
– Existing Property, A.R.S. §42-13301
• 10% of that prior year’s value, or
• 25% of the difference between the current full cash value and the prior year’s limited value
Frazer Ryan Goldberg & Arnold, LLP
– New or Omitted Property.
• Rule “B”
• Calculation of Tax
Frazer Ryan Goldberg & Arnold, LLP
Administrative Appeals of Locally-Valued Real Property Valuation and Classification
Frazer Ryan Goldberg & Arnold, LLP
Parties to an Administrative Appeal
• Owner
• Others With An Interest in the Property
• County Assessor
• Department of Revenue
Frazer Ryan Goldberg & Arnold, LLP
Administratively Appealable Issues
• Valuation and Classification
• Discrimination
Frazer Ryan Goldberg & Arnold, LLP
Levels of Administrative Appeals
• Petition to County Assessor
– Multiple Appeals
• same economic unit according to Department of Revenue guidelines or if they are owned by the same owner, they have the same use, are appealed on the same basis and are located in the same geographic area
Frazer Ryan Goldberg & Arnold, LLP
– Petitions Based on Income Approach to Value
• An Income and Expense Statement form (DOR 82300) must be filed with the petition
• Must submit a sworn affidavit, under penalty of perjury, that the information submitted is true and correct to the best of his knowledge
– Exhaustion of Remedies
Frazer Ryan Goldberg & Arnold, LLP
– Petition Strategies
• Income Approach
• Comparable Assessments
• Isolation of Land and Improvement Valuation
• Mixed Classification
• Current Usage
• Assessor’s Errors
Frazer Ryan Goldberg & Arnold, LLP
– Hearing
– Representation
– Assessor’s Power to Increase Value
– Assessor’s Decision
Frazer Ryan Goldberg & Arnold, LLP
• Appeals to State Board of Equalization
– Description
– Who May Appeal
– Time for Appeal
– Decision
– Further Appeal
Frazer Ryan Goldberg & Arnold, LLP
Other Administrative Appeals Procedures
• Errors
• New Construction
Frazer Ryan Goldberg & Arnold, LLP
Property Tax Appeals to Court
Frazer Ryan Goldberg & Arnold, LLP
• During Valuation Year
• New Construction, Changes to Assessment Parcels and Changes in Use
• Contents of the Appeal– File a Notice of Appeal
– Contains a statement of the reasons why the valuation or classification is excessive or erroneous
– The appeal should identify the property
Frazer Ryan Goldberg & Arnold, LLP
• Parties to the Appeal. A.R.S. §42-16208
• Service on Defendants
• Timely Payment of Taxes
• Hearing
• Findings and Judgment
Frazer Ryan Goldberg & Arnold, LLP
Errors
Definition• An “error” means any mistake in assessing or
collecting property taxes resulting in:– an imposition of an incorrect, erroneous or illegal tax rate
that resulted in assessing or collecting excessive taxes
– an incorrect designation or description of the use of property or its classification
– applying the incorrect assessment ratio percentages
– misreporting or failing to report property if a statutory duty exists to report the property
Frazer Ryan Goldberg & Arnold, LLP
– A valuation that is based on an error that is exclusively factual in nature or due to a specific legal restriction that affects the subject property and that is objectively verifiable without the exercise of discretion, opinion or judgment, demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence, such:
• a mistake in the description of the size, use or ownership of land, improvements or personal property
• clerical or typographical errors in reporting or entering data that was used directly to establish valuation
Frazer Ryan Goldberg & Arnold, LLP
• A failure to timely capture on the tax roll a change in value caused by new construction, destruction, demolition or splitting or consolidating interests in real property existing on the valuation date
• the existence or non-existence of the property on the valuation date
• any other objectively verifiable error that does not require the exercise of discretion, opinion or judgment
Frazer Ryan Goldberg & Arnold, LLP
• Notice of Error - Tax Authority detects the error. A.R.S. §42-16252
• Taxpayer Detected Error
– Error in taxpayer’s favor. A.R.S. §42-16253
– Notice of Claim. A.R.S. §42-16254
• Timing
R ea l P roperty T ax V a luation A ppea ls
N otice to Taxpayer B efore M arch 1 o f p rio r year
Petition to Assessor File w ith in 60 days o f m ailing o f no tice
D ecis ion by A ugust 15
C onference requ ired if requested by thetaxpayer
Taxpayers in Sm all C ountiesAppeal to C ounty Board of
Equalization File w ith in 25 days o f m ailing o f assessor
decis ion
D ecis ion by O ctober 15
Taxpayers in Large C ountiesAppeal to C ounty Board of
Equalization File w ith in 25 days o f m ailing o f assessor
or county board decis ion
D ecis ion by O ctober 15 fo r p ropertyva lued by the C ounty; N ovem ber 15 fo rproperty va lued by the D epartm ent
Appeal to C ourt From adm in istra tive decis ion w ith in 60 days o f m ailing
date o f decis ion , o r
B y D ecem ber 15 where no adm in istra tive appea l isfiled
Further Appellate R eview
Frazer Ryan Goldberg & Arnold, LLP
Personal Property
• Personal property taxes are liens against the property.
• The taxpayer has an obligation to report its property to the assessing authority
Frazer Ryan Goldberg & Arnold, LLP
• Failure to report
• Construction work in progress
• Clean rooms
P ersona l P roperty T axV a luation A ppea ls
NO TICE TO TAX PAYER B efore the 1st M onday o f the
m onth
RULING BY ASSESSO R W ith in 30 days o f filing
PETITIO N TO ASSESSO R W ith in 30 days a fte r no tice is
de livered
APPEAL TO STATE BO ARD O FEQ UALIZATIO N
W ith in 30 days a fte r the date o f theassessor's no tice o f re fusa l
APPEAL TO CO URT W ith in 60 days o f m ailing o f
decis ion
2000
NO TICE TO TAX PAYER O n or before June 30
RULING BY ASSESSO R W ith in 20 days o f filing (like ly by
A ugust 9 )
PETITIO N TO ASSESSO R W ith in 20 days a fte r no tice is
de livered (like ly by Ju ly 20)
APPEAL TO CO UNTY O R STATEBO ARD O F EQ UALIZATIO N
W ith in 20 days o f the assessor'snotice o f re fusa l (like ly by A ugust 30)
APPEAL TO CO URT W ith in 60 days o f m ailing o f
decis ion
2001
R ea l P roperty T ax V a luation A ppea ls
N otice to Taxpayer B efore M arch 1 o f p rio r year
Petition to Assessor File w ith in 60 days o f m ailing o f no tice
D ecis ion by A ugust 15
C onference requ ired if requested by thetaxpayer
Taxpayers in Sm all C ountiesAppeal to C ounty Board of
Equalization File w ith in 25 days o f m ailing o f assessor
decis ion
D ecis ion by O ctober 15
Taxpayers in Large C ountiesAppeal to C ounty Board of
Equalization File w ith in 25 days o f m ailing o f assessor
or county board decis ion
D ecis ion by O ctober 15 fo r p ropertyva lued by the C ounty; N ovem ber 15 fo rproperty va lued by the D epartm ent
Appeal to C ourt From adm in istra tive decis ion w ith in 60 days o f m ailing
date o f decis ion , o r
B y D ecem ber 15 where no adm in istra tive appea l isfiled
Further Appellate R eview
Frazer Ryan Goldberg & Arnold, LLP
ARIZONA PROPERTY TAX OVERVIEW
Michael G. Galloway