Argument against Essociate Patent Troll

29

description

The opinion on Essociate’s patent is a well-reasoned one and reflects the arguments made by defense counsel James A. Epstein, Richard B. Newman and Darren M. Franklin, as well as by counsel Ben M. Davidson for co-defendant Crakmedia. Specifically, defense counsel argued that the Essociate patent is directed to the abstract idea of “receiving and tracking referrals from referral sources.”

Transcript of Argument against Essociate Patent Troll