April 7, 1998Year 2000 Subcommittee1 TPF Users Group Year 2000 Subcommittee Denver, Colorado April...
-
Upload
naomi-mcdonald -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of April 7, 1998Year 2000 Subcommittee1 TPF Users Group Year 2000 Subcommittee Denver, Colorado April...
April 7, 1998 Year 2000 Subcommittee 1
TPF Users Group TPF Users Group
Year 2000 Year 2000 SubcommitteeSubcommittee
Denver, ColoradoDenver, Colorado
April 7, 1998April 7, 1998
April 7, 1998 Year 2000 Subcommittee 2
The clock continues to tick:
• 633 days to “00”– Less than that for many– Some may have already
experienced an ‘opportunity’
• 15,181 hours• .01% of remaining hours
spent in this session
April 7, 1998 Year 2000 Subcommittee 3
Agenda• Housekeeping• Review Atlanta survey results• Year 2000 Compliance Hardware Testing
– Diane Powell, Y2K Infrastructure Program Director, The SABRE Group
• Managing System Interfaces/Test Strategy– Dick Hoffman, Senior Architect, SABRE
Technologies Solutions, The SABRE Group
• Close– How do you want this team to help you?
April 7, 1998 Year 2000 Subcommittee 4
Housekeeping• Please complete the attendance roster• Purpose
– The Purpose of the Year 2000 Subcommittee is to increase Year 2000 potential impact awareness throughout the user group and to establish inter-company communications and test plans.
• Subcommittee Co-Chairs– Jane S. Weeks, Holiday Hospitality Corp.
• Year 2000 Program Director
– Max Daniel, The SABRE Group• Project Manager, TPF/VM Infrastructure
April 7, 1998 Year 2000 Subcommittee 5
TPF Users Group TPF Users Group Year 2000 Year 2000
SubcommitteeSubcommittee
Results of Informal SurveyAtlanta - October 1997
April 7, 1998 Year 2000 Subcommittee 6
Year 2000 Virus Assessment
• Everyone felt their assessment was complete or would be complete by this conference!
• Over half of the projects in coding phase
• Most felt less than 30% of code was infected.
• Most thought their Most thought their hardware was complianthardware was compliant..
April 7, 1998 Year 2000 Subcommittee 7
Project Impact
• Most felt Y2K will impact other projects
• Maintenance cost• Most projects >$1MM
– 1 in 4 didn’t know 1 in 4 didn’t know • Staff augmentation
expected by most• Majority felt not
enough time to complete work
April 7, 1998 Year 2000 Subcommittee 8
Support
• Most felt they have a Y2K support group.
• 50% felt there are adequate conversion tools.
April 7, 1998 Year 2000 Subcommittee 9
Testing• Most projects have formal
test requirements.• Half didn’t know if their
project has a bridging strategy.
• Over half didn’t know Over half didn’t know when their business when their business partners will be compliantpartners will be compliant.
• 3 out of 4 projects will be in testing this year.
April 7, 1998 Year 2000 Subcommittee 10
Next
• Diane Powell– Program Director, Year 2000
Infrastructure, The SABRE Group