April 5, 2006

30
Economic and Level of Service Impacts Resulting from the Annexation by SMUD of PG&E’s Service Territories in Yolo County April 5, 2006

description

Economic and Level of Service Impacts Resulting from the Annexation by SMUD of PG&E’s Service Territories in Yolo County. April 5, 2006. GES Engineers & Appraisers. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of April 5, 2006

Page 1: April 5, 2006

Economic and Level of Service Impacts

Resulting from the Annexation by SMUD of PG&E’s Service Territories in Yolo County

April 5, 2006

Page 2: April 5, 2006

2

GES Engineers & Appraisers

• GES is an engineering and appraisal firm specializing in the valuation of special purpose property and consultation services on regulatory matters

• Presenter– Glenn Walker, Principal

Page 3: April 5, 2006

3

Role of GES

GES was retained by the Sacramento County Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) to

– Analyze the range of possible economic impacts associated with the annexation

– Review the impact on level of service and reliability resulting from an annexation

Page 4: April 5, 2006

4

Two Questions for theLAFCo to Address

• What is the difference in the expected cost of service to the existing SMUD customers and those in the annexation area that would result from approval by LAFCo?

• What is the difference in the expected level of service to both groups of customers that would result from the approval by LAFCo?

Page 5: April 5, 2006

5

Overview of Presentation• Economic impacts

– PG&E retail rate forecasts for annexation area– SMUD’s cost of service for annexation area

• Acquisition costs including purchase of system from PG&E• Operating costs• Non-bypassable charges

• Level of service and reliability resulting from an annexation

Page 6: April 5, 2006

6

Scope of Review by GES

• Reviewed documents submitted by SMUD and PG&E• Inspected portions of the electric property in the annexation

area• Compared SMUD and PG&E submittals to industry data and

GES experience

Page 7: April 5, 2006

7

Map of Annexation Area

Page 8: April 5, 2006

8

Potential Economic Impacts of Annexation

• An increase or decrease in the rates for existing SMUD customers• An increase or decrease in the rates for customers in the

annexation area from PG&E retail rates• A reduction in local franchise fee and property tax payments due to

SMUD’s not-for-profit structure• A reduction in state and federal income taxes due to SMUD’s not-

for-profit structure

Page 9: April 5, 2006

9

Mitigation by SMUD Board of Directors

• Surcharge for annexation area to mitigate any rate impact to existing SMUD customers

• SMUD rates in the annexation area will be 2% less than PG&E’s retail rates at the time of annexation and include a surcharge to recover annexation expenses

• Local communities will be compensated for franchise fee and property tax payments no longer being made by PG&E

Page 10: April 5, 2006

10

Measure of Economic Impacts

• Calculation of $/kWh Impact

start: PG&E Retail Rates ($/kWh)

less: SMUD Cost of Service ($/kWh)

equals: Total Economic Impacts ($/kWh)

Page 11: April 5, 2006

11

PG&E Retail Rates• Based on cost of service principle and

established by rate proceedings before the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC)

• Based on cost of providing service state-wide• Rates include

– Return on and of prudently invested capital– Reimbursement for prudently incurred operating costs

• Power supply costs• Operating and administrative costs• Franchise fee and property tax payments• Non-bypassable charges• Income taxes

Page 12: April 5, 2006

12

SMUD Cost of Service

• Based on cost of providing service in the annexation area• Cost of service includes

– Debt service associated with acquisition– Power supply costs– Operating and administrative costs– Franchise fee and property tax payments– Non-bypassable charges

Page 13: April 5, 2006

13

SMUD Cost of Service Advantages over Investor-Owned Utilities

• SMUD is a not-for-profit entity with no shareholder equity requirements

• SMUD can use tax-exempt debt• Avoidance of income taxes• Synergies created by annexing the

proposed territory into SMUD’s existing service areas

Page 14: April 5, 2006

14

Comparison of PG&E Retail Rate Forecasts in the Annexation Area

$0.1000

$0.1200

$0.1400

$0.1600

$0.1800

$0.2000

$0.2200

$0.2400

Year

$/kW

h

SMUD Estimate of PG&E Rates PG&E Estimate of its Rates

Page 15: April 5, 2006

15

Comparison of Various PG&E Retail Rate Forecasts with Adjusted Rate Forecasts

in the Annexation Area

$0.1000

$0.1200

$0.1400

$0.1600

$0.1800

$0.2000

$0.2200

Year

$/kW

h

SMUD Estimate of PG&E Rates PG&E Estimate of its Rates

Adjusted PG&E Rates

Page 16: April 5, 2006

16

SMUD Cost of Acquisition

• Purchase of assets from PG&E• Start-up and severance costs

Page 17: April 5, 2006

17

Comparison of SMUD and PG&E Acquisition Cost Estimates

 

SMUD($ in

millions)

PG&E($ in

millions)

Estimated Fair Market Value $84.00 $516.70

Severance, Start-up and Stranded Costs $53.00 $50.60

Total: $137.00 $567.30

     

Page 18: April 5, 2006

18

Valuation Theory Applicableto Purchase Price

• Regulated assets are valued for purposes of establishing rates at original cost less regulatory depreciation (net book value)

• Appraisers value assets by using the cost, sales comparison, and income capitalization approaches

Page 19: April 5, 2006

19

Summary of Cost Approach

• OCLD typically sets the floor of value– SMUD: $86 million– PG&E: $129 million

• RCNLD typically sets ceiling of value– SMUD: $133 million– PG&E: $516 million

Page 20: April 5, 2006

20

Summary of Sales Comparison Approach

• Typically applied using a ratio or other unit of comparison– Sale price / EBITDA– Sale price / net book– Sale price / customer

• Range of value using this approach– $70 million to $140 million for property in the annexation area

Page 21: April 5, 2006

21

Summary of Income Capitalization Approach

• Income approach measures economic potential of property using the following formula:

• Range of value using this approach– $60 million to $79 million for property in the annexation area(R)Rate

(I)Income(V)Value

Page 22: April 5, 2006

22

Range of Fair Market Value EstimatesUsing the Three Approaches to Value

Item Value($ in millions)

Cost Approach (RCNLD): $154

(OCLD): $84-$129

Sales Comparison Approach: $105

Income Capitalization Approach:

Reconciled @

$79

$110

Page 23: April 5, 2006

23

Comparison of SMUD and PG&E Forecasts of Power Supply Costs

in the Annexation Area

$45.00

$65.00

$85.00

$105.00

$125.00

$145.00

Year

$/M

Wh

SMUD PG&E

Page 24: April 5, 2006

24

Comparison of SMUD and PG&E Forecasts of Total Non-Debt Cost of Service for SMUD to Serve the Annexation Area

$100.00

$110.00

$120.00

$130.00

$140.00

$150.00

$160.00

$170.00

Year

$/M

Wh

SMUD PG&E

Page 25: April 5, 2006

25

Comparison of PG&E Retail Rate Forecasts with SMUD Total Cost of Serviceat $163 million Acquisition Cost

$0.1100

$0.1300

$0.1500

$0.1700

$0.1900

$0.2100

Year

$/kW

h

SMUD Estimate of PG&E Rates

SMUD Cost of Service @ $163 million

Adjusted PG&E Rates

Page 26: April 5, 2006

26

Comparison of PG&E Retail Rate Forecasts with SMUD Total Cost of Serviceat $188 million Acquisition Cost

$0.1100

$0.1300

$0.1500

$0.1700

$0.1900

$0.2100

Year

$/kW

h

SMUD Estimate of PG&E Rates

SMUD Cost of Service @ $188 million

Adjusted PG&E Rates

Page 27: April 5, 2006

27

Range of Economic Impacts Associated with SMUD’s Annexation

 

Present Value of EconomicImpact Over 20 Years

EstimatedAcquisition Cost

Adjusted PG&E

Rate Forecast

SMUD's PG&ERate

Forecast

$163 million (Assuming No Stranded

Facilities)(purchase price and start-

up) $190 million $380 million

$188 million(Assuming Stranded

Facilities)(purchase price and start-

up) $165 million $360 million

     

Page 28: April 5, 2006

28

Level of Service

• SMUD is proposing to provide service to all existing PG&E customers and any new customers

• SMUD is expected to provide the same level of service to customers as currently enjoyed by existing PG&E customers

Page 29: April 5, 2006

29

SMUD and PG&E SAIDI and SAIFI Indexes Using CPUC Method

Area2000-2004

Average SAIDI(minutes/

customers)

2000-2004Average SAIFI(interruptions

/customer)

PG&E – Mission Division

78.9 0.995

PG&E – Sacramento Div.

186.2 1.218

SMUD – System 57.83 0.892

Page 30: April 5, 2006

30

Questions