April 29 - May 1, 2015 Partnerships to Fight Poverty and Improve Opportunities for All – Workplace...
-
Upload
alan-montgomery -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of April 29 - May 1, 2015 Partnerships to Fight Poverty and Improve Opportunities for All – Workplace...
April 29 - May 1, 2015
Partnerships to Fight Poverty and Improve Opportunities for All – Workplace Engagement
Agenda
• Introduction
• Why Workplace Engagement
• Program Design/Lessons Learned
• Impact and Evaluation
• Next Steps
• Q & A
• UW-led Community Coalition with 70+ partners
• Twelve (12) Years Young
• Six (6) full-time staff & primarily grant-funded
• Core Services
• Tax Prep (VITA & AARP) – 20,000 returns filed annually
• Financial Literacy – Approx. 10,000 participant hours annually
• Integrated Service Delivery – RealSense Prosperity Place
• Began employer-based Tax Prep & Financial Workshops 6 years ago
Why Workplace Engagement?
• Wanted to reach target audience
• CBO workshops had low-turnout
• ALICE was underserved
• Connect CI more intentionally/strategically with RD
• Year-long engagement vs. campaign only
• Deeper connection with workplace donors
• Greater ability to promote CI agenda
• Enhanced volunteer recruitment capabilities
Program Design/Lessons Learned
• Empower employers to take lead and offer options (be flexible)
• Get the right facilitators on board up front
• Relatively inexpensive model
• Evaluation is critical to sustainability and promotion
• Workplace participants can differ from community workshop participants
• Corporate connections are great, but don’t forget the non-profit community
• Make workshops engaging and fun (as much as humanly possible)
• Providing lunch makes people happy…and more likely to attend!
Impact
Outputs
•Tax Prep (2015) – Ten employers – most also provided workshops
•Financial Workshops (2014-2015) - 56 Employers hosted 99 workshops to 1,359 employees
• Most employers hosted at least 3 workshops
Participant Profile – Day of Class
•98% had checking and 90% had savings accounts
•60% checked credit during previous 12 months
•Only 51% had a written budget
•Only 36% had paid all bills on time during previous six months
•Generally less satisfied with current financial condition than average American
Evaluation
Methodology – Ulrich Research Services, Inc.
Behavioral Changes – 72% of participants achieved a positive outcome in at least one of the following measures
•41% did not have a budget on the day-of-class, but said they had a written budget in the follow-up survey.
•21% had not checked their credit report on the day-of-class survey, but said they had done so on the follow-up survey.
•18% reported having overdraft fees in the 6 months prior to the day-of-class survey, and reported none in the follow-up survey.
•15% reported increased or stable debt on the day-of-class survey, and reported decreased debt on the follow-up survey.
•10% did not have a savings account on the day-of-class survey, but had obtained one by the follow-up survey.
Next Steps
• Seeking support/partnerships to allow expansion to rural communities
• Planning to broaden service options to include financial counseling and coaching
• Explore targeted delivery options around campaign
• Host Center for Excellence in Jacksonville in November 2015
• Please Join Us!