Apresentação Aveiro
-
Upload
adelina-silva -
Category
Documents
-
view
89 -
download
0
Transcript of Apresentação Aveiro
Is technology, per se, the only reason for social changes?
The new forms of human interaction, through the overcoming of the limitations imposed by time and by space.
The new forms of human interaction, through the overcoming of the limitations imposed by time and by space.
What has really changed?What has really changed?
This turned into a series of implications in the everyday life of the individuals, especially in what concerns the forms of communication.
This turned into a series of implications in the everyday life of the individuals, especially in what concerns the forms of communication.
In which principals are the communities based on?In which principals are the communities based on?
Typaldos, C. (2000), RealCommunities.com
ππ
ππ
ππ
ππππ
ππ
ππ
Exchange of Information
π
ππ
π
ππ
ππ
π π
π
π
Exchange of Values
Exchange of Competences
Exchange of Social Roles
Exchange of Goods
Exchange of Ideas
π
Pierre Levy, CRC, Université d’Ottawa
What’s the difference between the real and the virtual communities? What distinguishes them?
What’s the difference between the real and the virtual communities? What distinguishes them?
Real Community Virtual Community
Types Multiple types Normally based on interest
Mechanisms Face-to-face communicationNon presencial communication
Virtual communication- chat, e-mail, etc
Characteristics Geographical and time obstaclesOne-to-one or one-to-many communicationLanguage, voice, gestures communication richness
No geographical and time constraintsMany-to-many communication is also possibleBased mainly on written text
Members Vary depending on the community Normally finantially wealthier, with more time to spend on the internet
Width Normally small May vary (small or big)
Time demanded for formation
Normally a long time Normally quick
Kotha & Wadhwa,1999
It is easy to think that off-line (real) and on-line (virtual) communities are different, therefore it is impossible to establish a comparison.
But, what supports this? The geographical distance? The absence of physical language? The available media?
Does communicating in bits and bytes have the same immediate effect of the communication in presence?
It is easy to think that off-line (real) and on-line (virtual) communities are different, therefore it is impossible to establish a comparison.
But, what supports this? The geographical distance? The absence of physical language? The available media?
Does communicating in bits and bytes have the same immediate effect of the communication in presence?
How can anthropology contribute?How can anthropology contribute?
• Observing the repercussions and transformations that ICT has in the virtual world as well as in the real world;
• Identifying the rites of passage of the net users, that allow a permanent and generalized interchange of different sights of the world;
• Researching the social interactions and organization negotiated in such environment.
• Observing the repercussions and transformations that ICT has in the virtual world as well as in the real world;
• Identifying the rites of passage of the net users, that allow a permanent and generalized interchange of different sights of the world;
• Researching the social interactions and organization negotiated in such environment.
• Which alterations take place in the formation of friendships, in the relations of proximity, while interacting on-line?
• Would the process of changing between real/virtual communities implicate alterations in the final organization of the group?
• The idea one has of the other and, consequently, the way one is thought by the others, could lead to alterations in the final structuring of the communities?
• Which alterations take place in the formation of friendships, in the relations of proximity, while interacting on-line?
• Would the process of changing between real/virtual communities implicate alterations in the final organization of the group?
• The idea one has of the other and, consequently, the way one is thought by the others, could lead to alterations in the final structuring of the communities?
QuestionsQuestions
MethodologyMethodology
Sociometric questionnaireSociometric questionnaire
Focused on four areas: 1 – Authority or Respect of the group 2 – Organizational Abilities 3 – Comfort in Public 4 – Recreational Activities
Focused on four areas: 1 – Authority or Respect of the group 2 – Organizational Abilities 3 – Comfort in Public 4 – Recreational Activities
The questionnaire was answered before the interactions online started (with the real names of the participants) and again after the 3 months interactions online (with the nicknames of the participants).
The questionnaire was answered before the interactions online started (with the real names of the participants) and again after the 3 months interactions online (with the nicknames of the participants).
N.B.: The basic rule was that they shouldn’t reveal their real name while interacting online.N.B.: The basic rule was that they shouldn’t reveal their real name while interacting online.
[22:35]<EsPf> foi ás 11 da manhã!
[22:35] <jorga> cantao as nossas almas pra o menino eusebio uma salva de palmas
[22:35] <jorga> eeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
[22:35] <neu_ro_tic> es mto piadetico
[22:35] <Down_Rodeo> essebio
[22:35] <Down_Rodeo> uma salva de palmas
[22:35] <_Spinner> boa
[22:35] <_Spinner> palmas para ele
[22:36] <neu_ro_tic> so faz 60
[22:36] <Down_Rodeo> eee eeeee eeehehehehehehehehehehe
[22:36] <_Spinner> xiiiiiii
[22:36] <Down_Rodeo> o
[22:37] <jorga> o?
[22:37] <neu_ro_tic> viva portugal que ja esta apurado directamente para o europeu
[22:37] <neu_ro_tic> 2004
[22:37] <jorga> VIVA
[22:37] <EsPf> ok! o eusébio já passou à história!
[22:37] <neu_ro_tic> tb acho
[22:37] <EsPf> assim tá bem!
[22:37] <neu_ro_tic> ok
[22:38] <neu_ro_tic> vova ao fcp
1st Moment(Real Community)
2nd Moment(Virtual Community )
Authority or Respect of the GroupGroup A
Authority or Respect of the GroupGroup A
1st Moment(Real Community)
2nd Moment(Virtual Community )
Organizational AbilitiesOrganizational Abilities
1st Moment(Real Community)
2nd Moment(Virtual Community )
Comfort in PublicComfort in Public
1st Moment(Real Community)
2nd Moment(Virtual Community )
Recreational ActivitiesRecreational Activities
Variables depending on the response Positive (+) e Negative (-)
Observed vs. Expected Frequencies
Correlation of Categories
R1+ V1+ Chi-Square = 6,250df = 8 p < ,619251
0,625
R1 - V1 - Chi-Square = 6,833df = 8 p < ,554718
0,746
R2+ V2 + Chi-Square = 10,250df = 8 p < ,247920
0,071
R2 - V2 - Chi-Square = 4,533df = 8 p < ,806088
0,579
R3+ V3+ Chi-Square = 18,750df = 8 p < ,016258
0,625
R3 - V3 - Chi-Square = 5,583 df = 8 p < ,693791
0,358
R4+ V4+ Chi-Square = 17,300df = 8 p < ,027135
0,217
R4 - V4 - Chi-Square = 10,833df = 8 p < ,211328
0,579
Variables depending on the responsePositive (+) e Negative (-)
Observed vs. Expected Frequencies
Correlation of Categories
R1+ V1+ Chi-Square = 15,800df = 9 p < ,071182
0,2
R1 - V1 - Chi-Square = 6,000df = 9 p < ,739917
0,684
R2+ V2 + Chi-Square = 20,833df = 9 p < ,013413
0,575
R2 - V2 - Chi-Square = 16,500df = 9 p < ,057151
0,515
R3+ V3+ Chi-Square = 10,571df = 9 p < ,306236
0,269
R3 - V3 - Chi-Square = 5,300df = 9 p < ,807410
0,33
R4+ V4+ Chi-Square = 16,333df = 9 p < ,060243
0,266
R4 - V4 - Chi-Square = 11,783df = 9 p < ,225807
-0,18
Group A Group BResultsResults
Discussion and conclusionJust a few alterations took place in the organization and structure of the group – but overall the changes were not significant.
Group A presented changes in the variable 3 – Comfort in Public (positive choice) – and in the variable 4 – Recreational Activities (positive choice);
Group B, only in the variable 2 – Organizational Abilities (positive choice), presented a difference.
An atempt to explainAn atempt to explainThe comfort in using technology– for example,
the fact of a few of the students were more regular visitors of the chatrooms than others;
Being hidden behind a mask – nicknames- students could feel more uninhibited;
The ability to write using a keyboard, dominating the language and especially the fact of not being in presence of a physical body – first factor of the formation of impression in real context.
The objective of each individual is to be accepted by other(s), therefore everything said or done in this context will have repercussions not only in this context, but also in real context,– all the individuals knew each other in the real world.
Thank You!