Approaches to assessing risks & benefits: Lessons from postmenopausal hormone therapy studies

20
Presented by Judith Hsia, M.D. at the December 2, 2004 meeting of the Advisory Committee for Reproductive Health Drugs

description

Presented by Judith Hsia, M.D. at the December 2, 2004 meeting of the Advisory Committee for Reproductive Health Drugs. Approaches to assessing risks & benefits: Lessons from postmenopausal hormone therapy studies. Biomarkers Observational studies Randomized trials Intermediate outcomes. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Approaches to assessing risks & benefits: Lessons from postmenopausal hormone therapy studies

Page 1: Approaches to assessing  risks & benefits: Lessons from postmenopausal hormone therapy studies

Presented byJudith Hsia, M.D.

at the December 2, 2004

meeting of theAdvisory Committee for Reproductive

Health Drugs

Page 2: Approaches to assessing  risks & benefits: Lessons from postmenopausal hormone therapy studies

Approaches to assessing risks & benefits: Lessons from

postmenopausal hormone therapy studies

• Biomarkers

• Observational studies

• Randomized trials

• Intermediate outcomes

Page 3: Approaches to assessing  risks & benefits: Lessons from postmenopausal hormone therapy studies

Change in Lipids After Menopause

90

100

110

-24 6-18 -12 -6 0

% o

f le

vel a

t -6

mon

ths

befo

re m

enop

aus

e

Jensen J et al. Maturitas 1990;12:321-31.

Total Cholesterol

90

100

110

-24 6-18 -12 -6 0

HDL-C

Months

90

100

110

-24 6-18 -12 -6 0

% o

f le

vel a

t -6

mon

ths

befo

re m

enop

aus

e

LDL-C

Months

90

100

110

-24 6-18 -12 -6 0

Triglycerides

Page 4: Approaches to assessing  risks & benefits: Lessons from postmenopausal hormone therapy studies

Estrogen + Progestin and Intermediate Outcomes (% change, E+P minus Placebo)

Total cholesterol LDL-cholesterol HDL-cholesterol Triglycerides Glucose Insulin

Systolic BP Diastolic BP Weight Waist Circumference

Waist-to-Hip Ratio

% Change from Baseline (E+P minus Placebo)

*-2.5

*-12.7

7.3*

6.9*

*-5.4

-7.1

0.9*

-0.1

*-0.4

*-0.9

-0.2

Year 1 minus baseline (95% CI)

Legend% change, E+P minus placebo

*p <0.05

NEJM 2003;349:523-34

Page 5: Approaches to assessing  risks & benefits: Lessons from postmenopausal hormone therapy studies

Observational Studies with Estrogen +Progestin

Relative Risk

Breast cancer

<5y

>5y

1.15

1.53

Hip fracture 0.75 (0.68-0.84)

Stroke 1.45 (1.10-1.92)

Pulmonary embolism 2.1 (1.2-3.8)

Coronary heart disease 0.61 (0.45-0.82)

NEJM 2003;248:7

Page 6: Approaches to assessing  risks & benefits: Lessons from postmenopausal hormone therapy studies

Stroke?

Coronary Artery DiseaseBreast Cancer

Risk Benefit

Plan to follow to 2005 (average 8.5 years)

Additional Benefits:• Bone (Hip) Fractures• Overall Mortality

Additional Risks:• VTE (PE, DVT)

WHI Hormone Program: Baseline Hypotheses

Page 7: Approaches to assessing  risks & benefits: Lessons from postmenopausal hormone therapy studies

Initiated screening (N = 373,092)

Women who had no uterus at start of study

N= 10,739

Women who had a uterus at

start of study

N= 16,608

CEE+daily MPA PlaceboCEE Placebo

Women’s Health Initiative Hormone Trials

Page 8: Approaches to assessing  risks & benefits: Lessons from postmenopausal hormone therapy studies

WHI: Clinical outcomes in the Estrogen Plus Progestin Trial

Outcome E+P

RRNominal95% CI

Coronary Heart Disease 1.24 1.00-1.54

Strokes 1.31 1.02-1.68

Venous thromboembolism 2.11 1.58-2.82

Breast cancer 1.24 1.02-1.50

Colorectal cancer 0.61 0.42-0.87

Hip fractures 0.67 0.47-0.96

Dementia 2.05 1.21-3.48

Various WHI papers

Page 9: Approaches to assessing  risks & benefits: Lessons from postmenopausal hormone therapy studies

WHI E+P: Absolute risk or benefitE

vent

s pe

r 10

,000

wom

an-y

ears

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

CHD

Stroke

VTE

Breast

ca

Colon ca

Hip F

x

Dementia

Placebo

Active

Page 10: Approaches to assessing  risks & benefits: Lessons from postmenopausal hormone therapy studies

24% Increase Breast Cancer

Also: DVTs

Fracture Reduction (Hip 23%)

STOPPED Early, Clear Harm

Threshold Level

24% Increase CHD31% Increase

Stroke

RisksBenefits

JAMA. 2002;288:321-333

Stopped 3.3 yrs early

111% Increase Pulmonary Emboli

39% Reduction Colorectal Cancer

WHI E+P Trial Findings, July 2002 (avg 5.2 y)

105% Increase Dementia

Page 11: Approaches to assessing  risks & benefits: Lessons from postmenopausal hormone therapy studies

Observational Study vs Randomized Trial Results

Observational

Studies

Breast cancer

<5y

>5y

1.15

1.53

Hip fracture 0.75 (0.68-0.84)

Stroke 1.45 (1.10-1.92)

Pulmonary embolism 2.1 (1.2-3.8)

Coronary heart disease 0.61 (0.45-0.82)NEJM 2003;248:7

WHI E+P

1.24 (1.02-1.50)

0.67 (0.47-0.96)

1.31 (1.02-1.68)

2.13 (1.45-3.11)

1.24 (1.00-1.54)Various WHI papers

Page 12: Approaches to assessing  risks & benefits: Lessons from postmenopausal hormone therapy studies

Possible explanations

• Confounding due to “healthy user” effect

• Compliance bias – women adherent to hormones may also adhere to other healthful behaviors

• Outcomes identification bias

• Incomplete capture of early clinical events

NEJM 2003;348:7

Page 13: Approaches to assessing  risks & benefits: Lessons from postmenopausal hormone therapy studies

CEE vs CEE+MPA

Page 14: Approaches to assessing  risks & benefits: Lessons from postmenopausal hormone therapy studies

WHI: Relative risk or benefit

Outcome E+P E Alone

RR Nominal95% CI RR Nominal

95% CI

Coronary Heart Disease

1.24 1.00-1.54 0.91 0.75-1.12

Strokes 1.31 1.02-1.68 1.39 1.10-1.77

Venous thrombo-embolism

2.11 1.58-2.82 1.33 0.99-1.79

Breast cancer 1.24 1.02-1.50 0.77 0.59-1.01

Colorectal cancer 0.61 0.42-0.87 1.08 0.75-1.55

Hip fractures 0.67 0.47-0.96 0.61 0.41-0.91

Dementia 2.05 1.21-3.48 1.49 0.83-2.66

JAMA 2004;291:1701-12

JAMA 2004;291:2947-58 Various WHI papers

Page 15: Approaches to assessing  risks & benefits: Lessons from postmenopausal hormone therapy studies

WHI: Absolute risk or benefitE

vent

s pe

r 10

,000

wom

an-y

ears

E Alone

E+P

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Placebo

Active

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

CHD

Stroke

VTE

Breast

ca

Colon ca

Hip F

x

Dementia

Placebo

Active

Page 16: Approaches to assessing  risks & benefits: Lessons from postmenopausal hormone therapy studies

Also: DVTs

Fracture Reduction (Hip 39%)

STOPPED Early, suggestion of harm

Threshold Level

Neutral for CHDNeutral for breast cancer

39% Increase Stroke

Risks

Benefits

JAMA 2004;291:2947-58

Stopped 1.7 yrs early

34% Increase Pulmonary Emboli

WHI E Alone Trial Findings, 2/04 (avg 6.8 y)

49% Increase Dementia

Page 17: Approaches to assessing  risks & benefits: Lessons from postmenopausal hormone therapy studies

Impact of added androgen may be difficult to predict

Page 18: Approaches to assessing  risks & benefits: Lessons from postmenopausal hormone therapy studies

Intermediate Outcomes

Page 19: Approaches to assessing  risks & benefits: Lessons from postmenopausal hormone therapy studies

Estrogen Trials with Intermediate Outcomes

• Coronary angiography – 3 randomized trials demonstrated no benefit (or harm) with PHT

• Carotid ultrasound – 1 randomized trial demonstrated benefit with estradiol

• Coronary calcification – no trial data

NEJM 2000;343:522JAMA 2002;288:2432NEJM 2003;349:535 Ann Intern Med 2001;135:939

Page 20: Approaches to assessing  risks & benefits: Lessons from postmenopausal hormone therapy studies

Approaches to evaluating risk

• Biomarkers – mixed picture; may not be predictive• Observational studies – subject to bias &

confounding; suitable cohorts may not be available• Randomized trials with intermediate outcomes –

potentially useful• Randomized trials with clinical outcome – long &

expensive