Approaches for the generation of femtosecond x-ray pulses Zhirong Huang (SLAC)
-
Upload
vivien-perkins -
Category
Documents
-
view
222 -
download
2
Transcript of Approaches for the generation of femtosecond x-ray pulses Zhirong Huang (SLAC)
Femtosecond (fs) x-ray pulses are keys to exploring ultra-fast science at a future light source facility
In typical XFEL designs based on SASE the photon pulse is similar in duration to the electron bunch, limited to 100~200 fs due to short-bunch collective effects
Great interests to push SASE pulse length down to ~10 fs and even below 1 fs
A recent LCLS task force studied upgrade possibilities, including short-pulse approaches
I will discuss and analyze several approaches
Introduction
in the next 1800000000000000000 fs!
Temporal characteristics of a SASE FEL
Outline of the Talk
Optical manipulation of a frequency-chirped SASE• Compression• Slicing: single-stage and two-stage• Statistical analysis
Electron bunch manipulation• Spatial chirp• Enhancing undulator wakefield• Selective emittance spoiling (slotted spoiler)
Sub-femtosecond possibilities
E(t)=j E1(t-tj), tj is the random arrival time of jth e-
Temporal Characteristics of a SASE FEL Temporal Characteristics of a SASE FEL
E1: wave packet of a single e- after Nu undulator period
Nu
Coherence time coh determined by gain bandwidth
SASE has M temporal (spectral) modes with relative intensity fluctuation M-1/2
Its longitudinal phase space is ~M larger than Fourier transform limit
• Narrower bandwidth for better temporal coherence• shorter x-ray pulse (shortest is coherence time)
bunch length Tb
Sum of all e- E(t)coh
1 % of X-Ray Pulse Length1 % of X-Ray Pulse Length
• LCLS near saturation (80 m)
bunch length 230 fs
coherence time 0.3 fs
number of modes ~ 700
statistical fluctuation w/W ~ 4 %
Shortest possible XFEL pulse length is only 300 as!
X-ray Pulse Compression Energy-chirped e-beam produces a frequency-chirped
radiation
No CSR in the compressor, demanding optics
C. Pelligrini, NIMA, 2000
Pair of gratings to compress the radiation pulse
Pulse length controlled by SASE bandwidth and chirp
X-ray Pulse Slicing Instead of compression, use a monochromator to select
a slice of the chirped SASE
t
ω
compression
SASE FELMonochromator
Single-stage approach
monochromator
short x-ray slice
Slicing after the first undulator before saturation reduces power load on monochromator
Second stage seeded with sliced pulse (microbunching removed by bypass chicane), which is then amplified to saturation
Allows narrow bandwidth for unchirped bunches
SASE FELMonochromator
FEL Amplifier
ChicaneC. Schroeder et al., NIMA, 2002
Two-stage Pulse Slicing
Statistical analysis (S. Krinsky & Z. Huang, PRST-AB, 2003)
Frequency-chirp
• coherence time is indep. of chirp u
• frequency span and frequency spike width coh ~ u
Analysis of Frequency-chirped SASEAnalysis of Frequency-chirped SASE
A monochromator with rms bandwidth m passes MF modes
Minimum Pulse DurationMinimum Pulse Duration
The rms pulse duration t after the monochromator
Minimum pulse duration is limited to for either compression or slicing
Slightly increased by optical elements (~ fs)
t
ω
u
u/
u/
One-stage ApproachOne-stage Approach SASE bandwidth reaches minimum (~) at saturation minimum rms pulse duration = 6 fs (15 fs fwhm) for 1% energy chirp
uu /~/)( min
t minimum for broad m choose m ~ to increase MF (decrease energy fluctuation) and increase photon numbers
Slicing before saturation at a larger SASE bandwidth leads to a longer pulse
Two-stage Approach
Ginger LCLS run
Synchronization between sliced pulse and the resoant part of chirped electrons in 2nd undulator ~ 10 fs
• FEL power vs. y’ offset for LCLS
• Gain is suppressed for most parts ofthe bunch except the on-axis portion
Spatially Chirped BunchSpatially Chirped Bunch
30-fs 30-fs xx-ray-ray
200-fs 200-fs ee bunch bunch
Undulator ChannelUndulator Channel
P. Emma & Z. Huang, 2003 (Mo-P-52)
y vs. z at start of undulator
• No additional hardware for LCLS
• RF deflector before BC2 less jitter
• Beam size < 0.5 mm in linac
?
+2y
0
2y
EE = 4.5 GeV, = 4.5 GeV,zz = 200 = 200 m,m,
VV00 = 5 MV = 5 MV
1.0 m1.0 m
FWHM x-ray pulse ~ 30 fs
Ideal case (step profile) with various materials for the vacuum chamber to control wakefield amplitude
4 fs (FWHM)
S. Reiche et al., NIMA, 2003
Change of vacuum chamber to high resistivity materials (graphite) is permanent, no long pulse operation
Using Enhanced WakefieldUsing Enhanced Wakefield
Large x-z correlation inside a bunch compressor chicaneLarge x-z correlation inside a bunch compressor chicane
Where else can we access fs time?
2.6
mm
rm
s2.
6 m
m r
ms
0.1 mm rms0.1 mm rms
Easy access to Easy access to timetime coordinate coordinate along bunchalong bunch
LCLS BC2
Slotted-spoiler Scheme
1 m emittance
5 m emittance
1 m emittance
P. Emma et al. submitted to PRL, 2003 (Mo-P-51)
ParmelaParmela ElegantElegant GenesisGenesis Simulation, including foil-wake, scattering and CSR Simulation, including foil-wake, scattering and CSR
2 fsec fwhm2 fsec fwhm
fs and sub-fs x-ray pulsesfs and sub-fs x-ray pulses• A full slit of 250 m unspoiled electrons of 8 fs (fwhm) 2~3 fs x-rays at saturation (gain narrowing of a Gaussian electron pulse)
• stronger compression + narrower slit (50 m) 1 fs e-
sub-fs x-rays (close to a single coherence spike!)
Statistical Single-Spike SelectionStatistical Single-Spike Selection
I8 / I18
8 Å 1 Å
Unseeded single-bunch HGHG (8 4 2 1 Å )
sub-fs spikeSaldin et al., Opt. Commun., 2002
Selection ProcessSelection ProcessSet energy threshold to reject multi-spike events (a sc linac helps)
ConclusionsConclusions XFEL can open both ultra-small and ultra-fast worlds
Many good ideas to reduces SASE pulse lengths from 100 fs to ~ 10 fs level
Optical manipulations are limited by SASE bandwidth, available electron energy chirp, and optical elements
Electron bunch manipulations and SASE statistical properties may allow selection of a single coherent spike at sub-fs level
Time for experimental investigations