Approach to traumatic brain injury

102
ALI AL-BUSAIDI R4 APPROACH TO TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY

description

 

Transcript of Approach to traumatic brain injury

  • 1. ALI AL-BUSAIDIR4 APPROACH TO TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY

2. OUTLINES

  • Introduction
  • Definition
  • Pathophysiology
  • Severe head injury
  • Minor head injury
  • Second impact syndrome
  • Cerebral herniation

3. INTRODUCTION

  • Traumatic brain injury (TBI) encompasses a broad range of pathologic injuries to the brain of varying clinical severity that result from head trauma.
  • MVC ---- young
  • Fall ---- elderly

4. ETIOLOGY

  • MVAapprox. 28-50%
  • Falls 20-30% (infants, children, elderly)
  • Assaults 9-10%
  • Sports and recreational - 10-20%

5. DEFINITIONS

  • Head injury:
  • Injury is clinicallyevident on physical examination.
  • Traumatic brain injury:
  • Not always clinically evident.

6. CLASSIFICATION

  • Clinical severity scores
  • Neuroimaging scales
  • Leading Cause - MVAapprox. 28-50%
  • 0-20%

7. 8. 9.

  • PROGNOSISCohort studies have suggested that patients with severe head injury (GCS 8) have about a 30 percent risk of death and only about 25 percent achieve long-term functional independence .

10.

  • Specific outcome predictors include :
  • GCS at presentation (especially the GCS motor score)
  • CT findings (subarachnoid hemorrhage, cisternal effacement, midline shift)
  • Pupillary function
  • Age
  • Associated injuries
  • Hypotension
  • Hypoxemia
  • Pyrexia
  • Elevated ICP
  • Reduced CPP
  • Bleeding diathesis (low platelet count, abnormal coagulation

11. PATHOPHYSIOLOGY

  • primary brain injury
  • secondary brain injury.

12. PRIMARY BRAIN INJURY

  • occurs at the time of trauma.
  • Common mechanisms include direct impact, rapid acceleration/deceleration, penetrating injury, and blast waves.
  • The damage that results includes a combination of focal contusions and hematomas, as well as shearing of white matter tracts (diffuse axonal injury) along with cerebral edema and swelling.

13. 14. Diffuse axonal injury

  • Shearing mechanisms lead to diffuse axonal injury (DAI), which is visualized pathologically and on neuroimaging studies as multiple small lesions seen within white matter tracts.
  • present with profound coma without elevated intracranial pressure (ICP), and often have poor outcome.
  • Involves the gray-white junction in the hemispheres

15. 16. Epidural hematomas

  • Typically associated with torn dural vessels such as the middle meningeal artery
  • are almost always associated with a skull fracture
  • are lenticular-shaped
  • tend not to be associated with underlying brain damage

17. 18. Subdural hematomas

  • result from damage to bridging veins
  • Are crescent-shaped
  • are often associated with underlying cerebral injury

19. 20. Subarachnoid hemorrhage

  • can occur with disruption of small pial vessels
  • commonly occurs in the sylvian fissures and interpeduncular cisterns.
  • may also extend into the subarachnoid space .

21. Intraventricular hemorrhage

  • Is believed to result from tearing of s ubependymal veins, or by extension from adjacent intraparenchymal or subarachnoid hemorrhage.

22. SECONDARY BRAIN INJURY

  • a cascade of molecular injury mechanisms :
  • Neurotransmitter-mediated excitotoxicity causing glutamate, free-radical injury to cell membranes
  • Electrolyte imbalances
  • Mitochondrial dysfunction
  • Inflammatory responses
  • Apoptosis
  • Secondary ischemia from vasospasm, focal microvascular occlusion, vascular injury

23. 24.

  • Examples:
  • hypotension
  • hypoxia -- decrease substrate delivery of oxygen and glucose to injured brain
  • fever
  • seizures -- mayincrease metabolic demand
  • hyperglycemia

25. CUSHING'S REFLEX

  • is seen in only one third of cases of life-threatening increased ICP.
  • Triad of:
  • hypertension
  • bradycardia
  • diminished respiratory effort

26. INITIAL EVALUATION AND TREATMENT 27. Prehospital

  • The primary goal of prehospital management for severe head injury is to prevent hypotension and hypoxia
  • Early endotracheal intubation is generally recommended for patients with a GCS of 8 or less if performed by well-trained personnel.
  • If this expertise is not available, bag-mask ventilation is recommended.

28. Prehospital

  • In a meta-analysis of clinical trials and population-based studies , hypoxia (PaO2 90 mm Hg)
  • Vital signs including heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory status (pulse oximetry, capnography), and temperature require ongoing monitoring.

32. Emergency department

  • A neurologic examination should be completed as soon as possible
  • Neurologic status should be continuously assessed. Deterioration is common in the initial hours after the injury.

33. 34. Emergency department

  • The patient should be assessed for other systemic trauma.
  • evaluate and manage increased intracranial pressure
  • A complete blood count, electrolytes, glucose, coagulation parameters, blood alcohol level, and urine toxicology should be checked if indicated

35. Neuroimaging

  • Computed tomography (CT) is the preferred imaging modality in the acute phase of head trauma
  • should be performed as quickly as possible
  • CT scan will detect skull fractures, intracranial hematomas, and cerebral edema

36. Neuroimaging

  • Risk stratification

37. 38. 39. 40.

  • LOC
  • PTA
  • Depressed level of consciousness
  • Progressive , severe headache
  • Severe nausea or vomiting
  • Alcohol or drug intoxication
  • Age 3 feet
  • or five stairs)

42. NEW ORLEAN CRITERIA 43. COMPARISON OF THE CANADIAN CT HEAD RULE AND THE NEW ORLEANS CRITERIA IN PATIENTS WITH MINOR HEAD INJURY

  • Design, Setting, and PatientsIna prospective cohort study (June 2000-December 2002)that included 9 emergency departments in large Canadian community and university hospitals, the CCHR was evaluated in a convenience sample of2707 adultswho presented to the emergency department with blunt head trauma resulting inwitnessed loss of consciousness ,disorientation, or definite amnesia and a GCS score of 13 to 15 . The CCHR and NOC were compared in a subgroup of 1822 adults with minor head injury and GCS score of 15.
  • JAMA. 2005;294:1511-1518.

44. COMPARISON OF THE CANADIAN CT HEAD RULE AND THE NEW ORLEANS CRITERIA IN PATIENTS WITH MINOR HEAD INJURY

  • ResultsAmong 1822 patients with GCS score of 15, 8 (0.4%) required neurosurgical intervention and 97 (5.3%) had clinically important brain injury.The NOC and the CCHR both had 100% sensitivity but the CCHR was more specific (76.3% vs 12.1%,P 70 mm Hg and