Remote Sensing Techniques in Mapping Spatial Variability ...
Application of remote sensing technologies for mapping of ...
Transcript of Application of remote sensing technologies for mapping of ...
Application of remote sensing technologies for
mapping of cropping pattern and area
estimations for major summer and winter crops
across spatial and temporal scales: Lessons
learnt in Australia
A Potgieter
Climate variability
11 year running mean high variability at
temporal & spatial
0
5
10
15
20
25
1861
1879
1885
1891
1897
1903
1909
1915
1921
1927
1933
1939
1945
1951
1957
1963
1969
1975
1981
1987
1993
1999
2005
Year
Area (MHa) Production (Mtons)
Impact (Economic, Natural, Social)
Operating within a Variable Climate
• Australian producers are excellent risk
managers. Successful businesses within the
world’s most variable climate and without
subsidies
• Climate risk and change is already built into
the system
• Integration of climate forecasts with targeted
decision making tools – improved decision
making
• Developed world-leading crop production
systems frameworks & decision-support tools
Utility
Utility of crop predictions is a function of timing and accuracy
Early-Low
Late
-Hig
h
1 Jun 19?? to 31 Dec 20??
1 October 2003 to 31 May 2004
1 Jun 19?? to 31 Dec 19??
Start of
fallowForecast
distribution
based on
climate
forecast
Generating Yield Forecast Data Plumes –
Climate Forecast Set (e.g. at 1 June 2004)
Run model using weather data
to date for current season
Run model projections on subset of
historical analogues from climate
forecast to complete season
Regional crop prediction framework
0.5
0.7
0.9
1.1
1.3
1.5
1.7
1.9
2.1
April May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov
Month
Yie
ld (
t/h
a)
Forecast Worst10% Forecast-median Forecast Best10%
Forecast Climatol Lt-median
Hindcast Qld 1994SOI phases
Best 10%
Median
Worst 10%
0.5
0.7
0.9
1.1
1.3
1.5
1.7
1.9
2.1
April May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov
Month
Yie
ld (
t/h
a)
Forecast Worst10% Forecast-median Forecast Best10%
Forecast Climatol Lt-median
Hindcast Qld 1994SOI phases
Best 10%
Median
Worst 10%
0.5
0.7
0.9
1.1
1.3
1.5
1.7
1.9
2.1
April May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov
Month
Yie
ld (
t/h
a)
Forecast Worst10% Forecast-median Forecast Best10%
Forecast Climatol Lt-median
Hindcast Qld 1994SOI phases
Best 10%
Median
Worst 10%
Potgieter et. al. 2003, 2005, 2006
Spatial & temporal forecast
© QAAFI 2010 Created 9/08/2010 [Slide 7]
Predicted percentile
median yield
relative to all years
1st July 2015
Temporal scale
(a)
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
1
17
33
49
65
81
97
11
3
12
9
14
5
16
1
17
7
19
3
20
9
22
5
24
1
25
7
27
3
28
9
30
5
32
1
33
7
35
3
DOY
EV
I
SWQ Wheat
SWQ Barley
SWQ Chickpea
CQ Wheat
CQ Chickpea
SEQ Wheat
SEQ Barley
(b)
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
1
17
33
49
65
81
97
113
129
145
161
177
193
209
225
241
257
273
289
305
321
337
353
DOY
EV
I
SWQ Wheat
SWQ Barley
SWQ Chickpea
CQ Wheat
CQ Chickpea
SEQ Wheat
2005
2006
- Traditional approach:
Single date approach e.g.
DOY 225 does not capture
all possibilities of peak crop
canopy across regions
- Proposed approach:
Multi-temporal capturing all
available crop growth
information
- Ability to accurately
discriminate between
crops
Discriminating Crops: “MISSING LINK”
Curve Fitting Procedures
Time
Gre
en
ne
ss v
alu
e (i.e
. EV
I)
peak
Reconstructing of crop growth profile
HANTS (Verhoef et al 1996)
(a)
(b)
(c)
Amplitude
Phase
0 353
Day of Year (DOY)
(a)
(b)
(c)
Amplitude
Phase
(a)
(b)
(c)
(a)
(b)
(c)
Amplitude
Phase
0 353
Day of Year (DOY)
(Verhoef et al 1996; Potgieter et al.
2007, 2010, 2011 )
2005
2006
Discriminating between crops
(a )
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
1
17
33
49
65
81
97
11
3
12
9
14
5
16
1
17
7
19
3
20
9
22
5
24
1
25
7
27
3
28
9
30
5
32
1
33
7
35
3
DOY
EV
I
Actual
Reconstructed
(b )
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
1
17
33
49
65
81
97
11
3
12
9
14
5
16
1
17
7
19
3
20
9
22
5
24
1
25
7
27
3
28
9
30
5
32
1
33
7
35
3
DOY
EV
I
Actual
Reconstructed
Harmonic analysis of time series
Barley from satellite
Wheat from satellite
Validation & Training – ground truth data http://www.paddockwatch.com.au
Paddock Watch
Example of Winter cropping: Waggamba & Moree 2015
Ground truth & Accuracies: Waggamba 2015
EVI multi-temporal canopy profiles Accuracy of area estimates during
25 May 26 Jun 28 Jul 29 Aug 30 Sep 17 Nov
Jan May Nov
AVG: 87%
Wheat-78%; Chickpea-
98%
Barley-96%
Crop Area Estimates
Waggamba Moree
Other outputs: Land Use: Aug 2013 to Jul 2014
Cropping trajectories over time
AVG: 602k Ha
QLD: Increasing trend in Summer cropping of 36k Ha per year
Regional scale commodity forecasting framework
Potgieter et. al. 2003, 2005, 2006
Summer
2014/15 Winter
2014
Specific & Total Crop Area & Production
Land use patterns Bangladesh (source: Perry Poulton CSIRO)
Southern Bangladesh 16th Jan 2007 Lat:22.89ºN Long:91.40ºE(7173 km2)
Original image
Classified image
Land use class Area (%) Area (ha)
1. Fallow 13.7 217.8
2. Trees 18.3 291.8
3. Ponds 3.2 51.3
4. Cropping (*other) 64.8 1031.2
Total 100 1592.1
What lessons have we learnt?
• Utility of any prediction is based on accuracy and
timing
• Framework high efficacy in predicting crop area
estimates: at crop type level
• Successfully integrated to determine crop
production estimates at regional scale
• What spatial scale is needed? - horses for courses;
depending on what the issue is.
• Temporal resolution of outputs are sometimes more
useful than accuracy: TRENDS
• Ground truthing fields are critical in crop
discrimination
(source: NASA)
Which Satellite platform? Vegetation type:
• 75 current and planned
sensors from 2015 to 203
• Temporal & spatial
resolution
•Accessibility of data:
• 1 m to 1 km resolution
• once every 10 minutes
to ~once every month
The right answer
to the wrong
question
therefore…
Asking the right questions before designing any framework
KEEP IT SIMPLE !!!
Thankyou